Remimazolam-flumazenil provides fast recovery from general anesthesia compared to propofol during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation.

The optimal anesthetic agent for radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) of atrial fibrillation (AF) and its impact on the recovery profiles remain uncertain. We compared the recovery and hemodynamic parameters between the remimazolam-flumazenil and propofol groups during RFCA. Patients were randomized into the remimazolam-flumazenil and propofol groups. The primary outcome measure was the time to eye opening following the discontinuation of anesthetic agents. Secondary outcomes included time to extubation, time to discharge from the operating room, intraprocedural hemodynamic variables and postoperative quality outcomes. Fifty-three patients were included in the final analysis (n = 26 in the remimazolam-flumazenil and n = 27 in the propofol group). The time to eye opening was significantly shorter in the remimazolam-flumazenil group compared to the propofol group (median [interquartile range]: 174 [157-216] vs. 353 [230-483] s, P < 0.001). The mean blood pressure and bispectral index were significantly higher in the remimazolam-flumazenil group compared to the propofol group (mean difference [95% CI], 7.2 [1.7-12.7] mmHg and 6 [3-8]; P = 0.011 and < 0.001, respectively), which were within target ranges in both groups. Other secondary outcomes were comparable between the groups. Consequently, remimazolam emerges as a promising anesthetic agent, characterized by rapid recovery and stable hemodynamics, during RFCA of AF.Trial registration: NCT05397886.

Comparison of Remimazolam Tosilate and Propofol Sedation on the Early Postoperative Quality of Recovery in Patients Undergoing Day Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

Purpose: Remimazolam tosilate is a novel ultrafast-acting benzodiazepine that has a rapid emergence even after continuous infusion when using flumazenil. So far, relatively few articles are still focusing on the quality of recovery after general anesthesia with remimazolam, especially in day surgery. This study aimed to compare the early postoperative quality of recovery of remimazolam tosilate with flumazenil and propofol in patients undergoing day surgery. Patients and Methods: 137 patients scheduled for day surgery were randomly divided into the remimazolam tosilate or propofol group. The primary endpoint was the incidence of overall recovery assessed with the early postoperative quality of recovery scale (PostopQRS) on postoperative day 1 (POD 1). The Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale (RASS) scores in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU), extubation time, postoperative recovery profiles, and perioperative data were documented. Any adverse events were recorded. Results: The incidence of overall recovery on POD1 was 47.7% in the remimazolam tosilate group and 65.1% in the propofol group (odds ratio, 0.52; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.26 to 1.06; P = 0.072). In general, the overall recovery of the PostopQRS increased over time, and its interaction between time and group was significant (P = 0.003). Among the five dimensions of PostopQRS, there exist statistical differences between groups including emotional state and cognitive recovery. Upon arrival at the PACU, the remimazolam group was more sedated and took longer to recover to a RASS score similar to propofol. The frequency of application of vasoactive drugs during anesthesia was similar in both groups (P = 0.119). Despite rapid emergence with remimazolam after flumazenil reversal, re-sedation (10.8%) or somnolence (60%) in the PACU was observed, and the length of PACU stay in patients treated with remimazolam tosilate was longer than that of the propofol (35 min vs 30 min, P<0.001). Conclusion: General anesthesia with remimazolam tosilate in conjunction with flumazenil reversal permits rapid recovery of consciousness in day surgery, but there was a notable occurrence of re-sedation or somnolence observed in PACU.

A double-blind randomised crossover trial of low-dose flumazenil for benzodiazepine withdrawal: A proof of concept.

INTRODUCTION: Benzodiazepines (BZD) are a class of anxiolytics with varying uses, which primarily act on the GABAA receptor resulting in hyperpolarisation. BZDs are often a difficult drug class to cease once neuroadaptation has occurred; recommendations usually involve gradual dose reductions at variable rates. A growing body of evidence has suggested that low-dose flumazenil, a GABAA receptor antagonist, may be a useful agent to allow for rapid detoxification. AIM: To collect pilot data on the safety and efficacy of low-dose subcutaneous flumazenil to reduce BZD use, withdrawal symptoms, and craving in participants taking above and below the therapeutic maximum diazepam equivalent of 30 mg to inform on sample size for future trials. METHOD: In a randomised double-blinded crossover study design, participants received low-dose flumazenil first (4 mg/24 h for approximately eight days) or placebo first. Groups were divided into those taking < 30 mg diazepam equivalent and ≥ 30 mg diazepam equivalent at baseline. Main outcome measures were percentage reduction in daily diazepam use, withdrawal symptoms, and craving scores from baseline, difference in diazepam use across the placebo first group, and flumazenil related adverse events. RESULTS: Twenty-eight participants were recruited and randomised to flumazenil first (n = 14) and placebo first (n = 14). In participants taking ≥ 30 mg diazepam equivalent at baseline (n = 15), flumazenil significantly reduced diazepam use by 30.5% (p = 0.024) compared to placebo. CONCLUSION: Low-dose flumazenil may aid in BZD detoxification in participants taking daily diazepam equivalent doses greater than or equal to the therapeutic maximum (≥30 mg) by reducing the need for diazepam.

Pharmacological uses of flumazenil in benzodiazepine use disorders: a systematic review of limited data.

BACKGROUND: The estimated annual prevalence of drug use disorders is as high as 3%, underpinning the need to continually develop more effective treatments. Central nervous system dysregulation, contributing to acute and post-withdrawal syndromes, has traditionally been managed with benzodiazepines; however, a small but growing body of data indicate that the GABAA receptor antagonist, flumazenil, may offer some advantages over traditional management. AIM: To review the literature on the safety and efficacy of flumazenil in benzodiazepine use disorders and identify gaps in the literature. METHOD: A systematic method was used to identify randomised control trials. Where randomised control trials existed, non-randomised control trials were included to supplement findings. RESULTS: Eleven flumazenil trials were included with varying doses, frequencies and routes of administration. The evidence for flumazenil alone showed generally a reduction in withdrawal symptoms with the exception of one study where withdrawal symptoms initially increased. Flumazenil plus benzodiazepine tapering was assessed in one randomised control trial and a series of non-randomised control trials. Randomised control trial results showed that flumazenil plus benzodiazepine tapering was superior at reducing withdrawal symptoms compared to benzodiazepine tapering alone and placebo. Flumazenil was associated with no serious adverse events; however there remains a risk of seizures. CONCLUSION: Although flumazenil shows promising efficacy in the management of benzodiazepine use disorders and withdrawal, more randomized control trials are required before a definitive recommendation can be made around its use.

Protective effect of flumazenil infusion in severe acute benzodiazepine toxicity: a pilot randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the efficacy of flumazenil infusion in the maintenance of arousal and prevention of development of complications in severe benzodiazepine poisoning. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Sixty severely poisoned patients (intubated due to loss of consciousness) intoxicated by sole benzodiazepines referred to Loghman Hakim hospital between May 2018 and August 2019 were considered to be included in the current study. All were evaluated for possible contraindications of flumazenil administration. If there were no contraindications, we continued supportive care in one group and supportive care plus flumazenil infusion in the second group. Following response to the stat dose of flumazenil, complications, hospital stay, and outcome were compared between these two groups. RESULTS: A total of 60 benzodiazepine-poisoned patients aged between 16 and 84 years old (37 males and 23 females) were enrolled. There was no statistically significant difference between these two groups regarding the period of hospital stay. Need for intubation significantly decreased in the infusion group. None of the patients experienced seizure or dysrhythmia. One patient died in the control group which received only a stat dose of flumazenil. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of flumazenil is safe in benzodiazepine-poisoned patients with appropriate indications. Flumazenil infusion can significantly decrease the need for intubation and subsequent ICU admission. Even though flumazenil is an expensive antidote, its administration may decrease the need for ICU beds in the setting of acute poisoning.

The role of hippocampal GABAA receptors on anxiolytic effects of Echium amoenum extract in a mice model of restraint stress.

Echium amoenum (EA), a popular medicinal plant in Persian medicine, has anxiolytic, antioxidant, sedative, and anti-inflammatory effects. This study examined whether GABA-ergic signaling is involved in the anxiolytic effects of EA in mice. Sixty BALB/c mice (25-30 g) were divided into six groups (n = 10) as follows: the (I) control group received 10 ml/kg normal saline (NS). In the stress groups, the animals underwent 14 consecutive days of restraint stress (RS), and received following treatments simultaneously; (II) RS + NS; (III) RS + Diaz (Diazepam); (IV) RS + EA; (V) RS + Flu (Flumazenil) + EA; (VI) RS + Flu + Diaz. Behavioral tests including the open field test (OFT) and elevated plus maze (EPM) were performed to evaluate anxiety-like behaviors and the effects of the regimens. The plasma level of corticosterone and the hippocampal protein expressions of IL-1ß, TNF-α, CREB, and BDNF, as well as p-GABAA/GABAA ratio, were also assessed. The findings revealed that chronic administration of EA alone produced anxiolytic effects in both behavioral tests, while diazepam alone or in combination with Flu failed to decrease the anxiety-like behaviors. Furthermore, the p-GABAA/GABAA and p-CREB/CREB ratios, and protein levels of BDNF were significantly increased in the EA-received group. On the other hand, plasma corticosterone levels and the hippocampal IL-1ß and TNF-α levels were significantly decreased by EA. However, pre-treatment with GABAA receptors (GABAA Rs) antagonist, Flu, reversed the anxiolytic and molecular effects of EA in the RS-subjected animals. Our findings confirmed that alternation of GABAAR is involved in the effects of EA against RS-induced anxiety-like behaviors, HPA axis activation, and neuroinflammation.

Bolus infusion scheme for the adjustment of steady state [11C]Flumazenil levels in the grey matter and in the blood plasma for neuroreceptor imaging.

The use of hybrid PET/MR imaging facilitates the simultaneous investigation of challenge-related changes in ligand binding to neuroreceptors using PET, while concurrently measuring neuroactivation or blood flow with MRI. Having attained a steady state of the PET radiotracer using a bolus-infusion protocol, it is possible to observe alterations in ligand neuroreceptor binding through changes in distribution volumes. Here, we present an iterative procedure for establishing an administration scheme to obtain steady state [11C]flumazenil concentrations in grey matter in the human brain. In order to achieve a steady state in the shortest possible time, the bolus infusion ratio from a previous examination was adapted to fit the subsequent examination. 17 male volunteers were included in the study. Boli and infusions with different weightings were given to the subjects and were characterised by kbol values from 74 â€‹min down to 42 â€‹min. Metabolite analysis was used to ascertain the value of unmetabolised flumazenil in the plasma, and PET imaging was used to assess its binding in the grey matter. The flumazenil time-activity curves (TACs) in the brain were decomposed into activity contributions from pure grey and white matter and analysed for 12 â€‹vol of interest (VOIs). The curves highlighted a large variability in metabolic rates between the subjects, with kbol â€‹= â€‹54.3 â€‹min being a reliable value to provide flumazenil equilibrium conditions in the majority of the VOIs and cases. The distribution volume of flumazenil in all 12 VOIs was determined.

Adverse Drug Reaction: Midazolam-Induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms: A Case Report.

Midazolam is commonly used for sedation during procedures because of its relative safety and predictability. Still, some rare undesirable medication reactions have been described. We report a case in which midazolam given before a peripheral nerve block caused acute onset dyskinetic extrapyramidal symptoms. These symptoms ultimately resolved following reversal of the midazolam with flumazenil. Given the widespread and multidisciplinary use of midazolam, practitioners should be aware of the potential for rare adverse reactions and be prepared to manage these scenarios.

COMPARISON OF SUBCUTANEOUS ADMINISTRATION OF ALFAXALONE-MIDAZOLAM-DEXMEDETOMIDINE WITH KETAMINE-MIDAZOLAM-DEXMEDETOMIDINE FOR CHEMICAL RESTRAINT IN JUVENILE BLUE POISON DART FROGS (DENDROBATES TINCTORIUS AZUREUS).

Blue poison dart frogs (Dendrobates tinctorius azureus) are commonly maintained in zoological institutions and are becoming popular in the pet trade industry. Sedation or light anesthesia is required for safe and effective handling of this species. In this study, the sedative effects of subcutaneously administered alfaxalone-midazolam-dexmedetomidine (AMD) (20, 40, 5 mg/kg, respectively) and ketamine-midazolam-dexmedetomidine (KMD) (100, 40, 5 mg/kg, respectively) were compared in a prospective, randomized, blinded, crossover study in juvenile blue poison dart frogs (n = 10). Both protocols were partially reversed 45 min after administration of either protocol with subcutaneously administered flumazenil (0.05 mg/kg) and atipamezole (50 mg/kg). Heart rate, pulmonic respiratory rate, various reflexes, and behavioral parameters were monitored after drug administration. Both protocols resulted in rapid loss of righting reflex [median (range): AMD, 5 min (5-5 min); KMD, 5 min (5-10 min)]. Time to complete recovery was similar with both protocols (mean ± SD: AMD, 97.5 ± 11.4 min; KMD, 96.5 ± 25.4 min). The AMD protocol resulted in pulmonic respiratory depression, whereas no significant difference in heart rate was found between the two protocols. All frogs were observed eating within 24 hr of chemical restraint. Gastric prolapses occurred in four frogs (AMD 3, KMD 1) that were easily reduced with a cotton-tip application. No other adverse reactions were observed. The results of this study provide two different subcutaneous chemical restraint protocols in juvenile blue poison dart frogs.

Efecto antagonista del flumazenil sobre el isoflurano en la emersión de la anestesia general / Antagonist effect of flumazenil on isofluran in reversion of general anesthesia

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Isoflurane, an inhalational general anesthetic widely used in medical practice, belonging to the group of volatile liquids together with desflurane and sevoflurane, with various properties including sedation, hypnosis and anesthesia of patients undergoing treatment. surgical acts. Volatile inhalational anesthetics (halogenated) as mechanism of action, has the property of increasing inhibitory synaptic transmission at postsynaptic level by potentiating ion channels regulated by ligand activated by alpha-aminobutyric acid (GABA). Flumazenil is a benzodiazepine antagonist belonging to the group of imidazobenzodiazepine. It is currently known that there is no specific drug capable of antagonizing the effects of halogenates that allow the rapid and complete recovery of general anesthesia, for this reason this work focuses its efforts on demonstrating whether flumazenil has the ability to reverse the actions of the patient. isoflurane and allow an early restoration of the level of consciousness. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study to be performed is a clinical type of longitudinal, prospective, unicentric and double blind. The sample will be formed by patients who are going to be subjected to a balanced general anesthesia. The sample will be divided into 2 large groups: group C (control) and group F (Flumazenil). At the end of the surgery, the mixture will be administered according to the selected group in a random manner (Flumazenil 0.25 mg or 0.9% solution in a 20 cc syringe) and the time of extubation, recovery time of the level of consciousness, time of discharge UCPA and hemodynamic state (FC, TAM and SO2). RESULTS: The flumazenil group showed a significantly shorter time from injection to extubation than the placebo group (p = 0.007). Differences in terms of shorter times needed to achieve Aldrete of 9 points in the flumazenil group (P = 0.04) were observed as were shorter anesthetic arousal times represented by a Ramsey 2. Heart rate, mean arterial pressure and saturation they had similar values between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: The study showed that a single dose of 0.25 mg of flumazenil administered at the end of the surgical act, just after completing all surgical stimulation was beneficial (P = 0.007) in the context of extubation times and shorter anesthetic arousal times.

INTRODUCCIÓN Y OBJETIVOS: El isoflurano un anestésico general inhalatorio usado ampliamente en la práctica médica, perteneciente al grupo de los líquidos volátiles junto con el desflurano y sevoflurano, con variadas propiedades entre las que se encuentran la sedación, hipnosis y anestesia de los pacientes sometidos a actos quirúrgicos. Los anestésicos inhalatorios volátiles (halogenados) como mecanismo de acción, tiene la propiedad de aumentar la transmisión sináptica inhibidora a nivel postsináptico potenciando los canales iónicos regulados por ligando activados por ácido alfa-aminobutírico (GABA). El flumazenil es un antagonista benzodiazepínico perteneciente al grupo de los imidazobenzodiazepina. Se conoce actualmente que no existe un fármaco específico capaz de antagonizar los efectos de los halogenados que permitan la recuperación rápida y completa de la anestesia general, por tal motivo este trabajo centra sus esfuerzos en demostrar si el flumazenil tiene la capacidad para revertir las acciones del isoflurane y permitir un restablecimiento temprano del nivel de conciencia. MATERIALES Y MÉTODOS: El estudio a realizar es de tipo clínico de corte longitudinal, prospectivo, unicéntrico y doble ciego. La muestra se conformará por pacientes que vayan a ser sometidos a anestesia general balanceada. Se procederá a dividir la muestra en 2 grandes grupos: grupo C (control) y grupo F (flumazenil). Al final de la cirugía se administrará la mezcla según grupo seleccionado de manera al azar (flumazenil 0,25 mg o solución 0,9% en una jeringa de 20 cc) y se valorará el tiempo de extubación, tiempo de recuperación del nivel de conciencia, tiempo de alta de la UCPA y estado hemodinámico (FC, TAM y SO2). RESULTADOS: El grupo de flumazenil presentó un tiempo desde la inyección hasta la extubación significativamente más bajo que el grupo placebo (p = 0,007). Se observaron diferencias en términos de tiempos más bajos necesario para alcanzar Aldrete de 9 puntos en el grupo flumazenil (P = 0,04) al igual que tiempos de despertar anestésico más cortos representados por un Ramsey 2. La frecuencia cardíaca, presión arterial media y la saturación tuvieron valores similares entre los 2 grupos. CONCLUSIÓN: El estudio demostró que una única dosis de 0,25 mg de flumazenil administrado al final del acto quirúrgico, justo después de culminar toda estimulación quirúrgica fue beneficiosa (P = 0,007) en el contexto de tiempos de extubación y tiempos de despertar anestésico más cortos.

Use of Rodent Sedation Tests to Evaluate Midazolam and Flumazenil in Green Iguanas (Iguana iguana).

This study aimed to evaluate the applicability of rodent behavioral tests to assess the effects of midazolam and flumazenil in green iguanas. Four tests commonly used to assess sedation in rodents-the open field test, forced swim test, behavioral scale, and traction test-were conducted in 10 juveniles iguanas. The animals received midazolam (2 mg/kg IM) or 0.9% NaCl (0.4 mL/kg IM), and the tests were conducted between 0 and 300 min thereafter. To verify the effects of midazolam and flumazenil, the most informative tests from the evaluation stage and the limb withdrawal latency time (LWLT) were used. All 10 iguanas were tested under 4 conditions, as follows: MS, midazolam (2 mg/kg IM), followed 30 min later by 0.9% NaCl (0.4 mL/kg IM); FS, flumazenil (0.05 mg/kg IM), followed by 0.9% NaCl (0.4 mL/kg IM) 30 min later; MF, midazolam (2 mg/ kg IM), followed by flumazenil (0.05 mg/kg IM) 30 min later; and CON, 0.9% NaCl (0.4 mL/kg IM). The behavioral scale and the forced swim test showed the best detection of the onset, peak effect, and the differences between the sedated and control iguanas, with testing done between 15 and 240 min after drug administration. The sedative effect of midazolam began at 15 min and persisted through 180 min when assessed on the behavioral scale and 240 min when assessed by the forced swim test; flumazenil administration reversed the sedative effect. An increase in the LWLT was observed in the midazolam treatment groups between 15 and 30 min after drug administration. Flumazenil decreased LWLT between 15 and 180 min in the FS and at 60 min in the MF. In conclusion, the best methods to assess sedation in iguanas were the behavioral scale and the forced swim test. A dose of 2 mg/kg of midazolam was effective at inducing sedation in these juvenile iguanas, and this effect could be reversed by flumazenil.

Brain pharmacology of intrathecal antisense oligonucleotides revealed through multimodal imaging.

Intrathecal (IT) delivery and pharmacology of antisense oligonucleotides (ASOs) for the CNS have been successfully developed to treat spinal muscular atrophy. However, ASO pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) properties remain poorly understood in the IT compartment. We applied multimodal imaging techniques to elucidate the IT PK and PD of unlabeled, radioactively labeled, or fluorescently labeled ASOs targeting ubiquitously expressed or neuron-specific RNAs. Following lumbar IT bolus injection in rats, all ASOs spread rostrally along the neuraxis, adhered to meninges, and were partially cleared to peripheral lymph nodes and kidneys. Rapid association with the pia and arterial walls preceded passage of ASOs across the glia limitans, along arterial intramural basement membranes, and along white-matter axonal bundles. Several neuronal and glial cell types accumulated ASOs over time, with evidence of probable glial accumulation preceding neuronal uptake. IT doses of anti-GluR1 and anti-Gabra1 ASOs markedly reduced the mRNA and protein levels of their respective neurotransmitter receptor protein targets by 2 weeks and anti-Gabra1 ASOs also reduced binding of the GABAA receptor PET ligand 18F-flumazenil in the brain over 4 weeks. Our multimodal imaging approaches elucidate multiple transport routes underlying the CNS distribution, clearance, and efficacy of IT-dosed ASOs.

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTS OF MIDAZOLAM AND FLUMAZENIL IN THE BALL PYTHON (PYTHON REGIUS).

The study objective was to evaluate the sedative, muscle relaxant, and cardiorespiratory effects of midazolam and flumazenil in the ball python (Python regius). Ten healthy adult female ball pythons were used in a randomized and blinded crossover trial evaluating the effects of two dosages (1 and 2 mg/kg intramuscular [i.m.] in the cranial third of the body). In a subsequent open trial, nine ball pythons received 1 mg/kg i.m. of midazolam followed by 0.08 mg/kg i.m. of flumazenil 60 min later. Heart rate, respiratory rate, temperature, and the level of sedation and muscle relaxation (using a semiobjective scoring system) were evaluated. There were no significant differences between midazolam dosages for any of the parameters evaluated. Sedation scores were significantly increased compared with baseline from 15 min (1 mg/kg) and 10 min (2 mg/kg) postinjection up until 56 hr (1 mg/kg) and 72 hr (2 mg/kg) postinjection. Peak effect was reached 60 min postinjection, with 60% of snakes (6/10) being unable to right themselves. One snake developed paradoxical excitation with the 2 mg/kg dosage. Heart rates were significantly lower than baseline from 30 min to 128 hr postinjection with both midazolam dosages. Respiratory rates were significantly lower than baseline at four time points, with the highest dosage only: 15, 45, 60 min, and 8 hr postinjection. Flumazenil resulted in reversal of sedation and muscle relaxation in all snakes within 10 min of administration. However, resedation was evident in all snakes 3 hr after reversal. Midazolam administered at 1 and 2 mg/kg i.m. provides a moderate to profound, although prolonged, sedation and muscle relaxation in ball pythons. Flumazenil reverses the effects of midazolam in ball pythons, but its duration of action at the evaluated dosage is much shorter than midazolam, leading to resedation.

Biological profiling of piperazinediones for the management of anxiety.

The anxiolytic effect of earlier reported piperazinediones was assessed by elevated plus maze (EPM), hole-board and open-field (OFT) tests. The rats were administered pretreatment of three different doses i.e. 2, 1 and 0.5 mg/kg of compounds 52, 53 and 55 for seven consecutive days. Compound 52 and diazepam showed increase in open arm entries, increase in time spent therein and total arm entries at 1 mg/kg dose. The compound also produced increase in the number of head dip, sniffing behavior and total number of squares crossed compared to diazepam. In OFT paradigm grooming behavior, number of central squares crossed and the time spent in central area did not reveal statistical differences for diazepam and compound 52 at 1 mg/kg dose. Flumazenil mediated antagonism experiments of these showed that they were acting through benzodiazepine site on GABAA receptor. The levels of 5HT and 5HIAA were estimated in amygdalar region. Level of 5HT was found to be equivalent in case of compound 52 and diazepam treatment at dose of 1 mg/kg. Interestingly, compound 52 did not display sedative effect at higher dose in both animal models. Thus, present study indicated that compound 52 produced anti-anxiety property through modulation of GABAergic transmission.

Altered cerebral benzodiazepine receptor binding in post-traumatic stress disorder.

Agonists of the γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type A benzodiazepine (BZD) receptor exert anxiolytic effects in anxiety disorders, raising the possibility that altered GABA-ergic function may play a role in the pathophysiology of anxiety disorders, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). However, few neuroimaging studies have assessed the function or binding potential of the central GABAA BZD receptor system in PTSD. Therefore, our aim was to compare the BZD receptor binding potential between PTSD patients and healthy controls. Twelve medication-free participants with a current diagnosis of PTSD and 15 matched healthy controls underwent positron emission tomography (PET) imaging using [11C] flumazenil. Structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans were obtained and co-registered to the PET images to permit co-location of neuroanatomical structures in the lower resolution PET image data. Compared to healthy controls, PTSD patients exhibited increased BZD binding in the caudal anterior cingulate cortex and precuneus (p's < 0.05). Severity of PTSD symptoms positively correlated with BZD binding in the left mid- and anterior insular cortices. This study extends previous findings by suggesting that central BZD receptor system involvement in PTSD includes portions of the default mode and salience networks, along with insular regions that support interoception and autonomic arousal.

The use of flumazenil for benzodiazepine associated respiratory depression in postanesthesia recovery: risks and outcomes / O uso de flumazenil para depressão respiratória associada ao benzodiazepínico na recuperação pós-anestésica: riscos e resultados

Abstract Background and objectives The primary aim was to determine risk factors for flumazenil administration during postanesthesia recovery. A secondary aim was to describe outcomes among patients who received flumazenil. Methods Patients admitted to the postanesthesia recovery room at a large, academic, tertiary care facility after surgery under general anesthesia from January 1, 2010, to April 30, 2015, were identified and matched to 2 controls each, by age, sex, and surgical procedure. Flumazenil was administered in the recovery phase immediately after general anesthesia, according to the clinical judgment of the anesthesiologist. Demographic, procedural, and outcome data were extracted from the electronic health record. Conditional logistic regression, accounting for the 1:2 matched-set case-control study designs, was used to assess characteristics associated with flumazenil use. Results The incidence of flumazenil administration in the postanesthesia care unit was 9.9 per 10,000 (95% CI, 8.4-11.6) general anesthetics. History of obstructive sleep apnea (Odds Ratio [OR] = 2.27; 95% CI 1.02-5.09), longer anesthesia (OR = 1.13; 95% CI 1.03-1.24 per 30 minutes), use of total intravenous anesthesia (OR = 6.09; 95% CI 2.60-14.25), and use of benzodiazepines (OR = 8.17; 95% CI 3.71-17.99) were associated with risk for flumazenil administration. Among patients who received midazolam, cases treated with flumazenil received a higher median (interquartile range) dose than controls: 3.5 mg (2.0-4.0 mg) vs. 2.0 mg (2.0-2.0 mg), respectively (p < 0.001). Flumazenil use was correlated with a higher rate of unanticipated noninvasive positive pressure ventilation, longer postanesthesia care unit stay, and increased rate of intensive care unit admissions. Conclusions Patients who required flumazenil postoperatively had received a higher dosage of benzodiazepines and utilized more postoperative health care resources. More conservative perioperative use of benzodiazepines may improve postoperative recovery and use of health care resources.

Resumo Justificativa e objetivos Determinar os fatores de risco da administração de flumazenil durante a recuperação pós-anestésica e descrever os desfechos entre os pacientes que receberam flumazenil. Métodos Os pacientes admitidos em sala de recuperação pós-anestésica de um grande centro universitário em setor terciário de cuidados pós-cirurgia sob anestesia geral entre 1° de janeiro de 2010 e 30 de abril de 2015 foram identificados e pareados com dois controles cada por idade, sexo e procedimento cirúrgico. Flumazenil foi administrado na fase de recuperação imediatamente após a anestesia geral, de acordo com a avaliação clínica do anestesiologista. Os dados demográficos, dos procedimentos e dos desfechos foram extraídos do registro eletrônico de saúde. A regressão logística condicional para os desenhos do estudo de caso-controle pareado em 1:2 foi usada para avaliar as características associadas ao uso de flumazenil. Resultados A incidência da administração de flumazenil em sala de recuperação pós-anestésica foi de 9,9 por 10.000 (95% IC: 8,4-1,6) anestesias gerais. História da apneia obstrutiva do sono (razão de chances [OR] = 2,27; IC 95%: 1,02-5,09), anestesia de longa duração (OR = 1,13; IC 95%: 1,03-1,24 por 30 minutos), uso de anestesia intravenosa total (OR = 6,09; IC de 95%: 2,60-14,25) e uso de benzodiazepínicos (OR = 8,17; IC 95%: 3,71-17,99) foram associados a risco para a administração de flumazenil. Entre os pacientes que receberam midazolam, os casos tratados com flumazenil receberam uma dose mediana mais alta (intervalo interquartil) do que os controles: 3,5 mg (2,0-4,0 mg) vs. 2,0 mg (2,0-2,0 mg), respectivamente (p < 0,001). O uso de flumazenil foi correlacionado com uma taxa maior não prevista de ventilação não invasiva com pressão positiva, permanência mais longa em sala de recuperação pós-anestésica e aumento da taxa de admissões em unidade de terapia intensiva. Conclusão Os pacientes que precisaram de flumazenil no pós-operatório receberam uma dose maior de benzodiazepínicos e usaram mais recursos de cuidados da saúde no pós-operatório. O uso mais conservador de benzodiazepínicos no período perioperatório pode melhorar a recuperação e o uso de recursos de cuidados da saúde no pós-operatório.

Flumazenil reduces respiratory complications during anesthesia emergence in children with preoperative upper respiratory tract infections.

Despite its benignity, upper respiratory infections (URIs) 1 increase the risk of postoperative respiratory complications during the perioperative and postoperative periods. Flumazenil could improve the symptoms of respiratory obstruction.To evaluate the effect of flumazenil on the occurrence of respiratory complications during anesthesia emergence of children with preoperative URI.This was a prospective study of 164 consecutive pediatric patients who underwent strabismus surgery under general anesthesia at the Tianjin Eye Hospital between August 2016 and April 2017. The patients were grouped as: normal airway (N), recent mild URI (I), normal airway and flumazenil (NF), and recent mild URI and flumazenil (group IF) (n = 41/group). An initial dose of flumazenil (0.1 mg) was administrated intravenously to groups IF and NF. The intraoperative and postoperative respiratory complications were recorded by one anesthesiologist unaware of the grouping.All patients underwent surgery uneventfully. The incidence of postoperative respiratory complications in post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) was higher in group I compared with the other 3 groups (IF: 17%; I: 41%; NF: 5%; N: 10%; P = .0147). During the PACU period, significant differences among groups were seen for cough (IF: 15%; I: 20%; NF: 2%; N: 0%; P = .004), secretion (IF: 17%; I: 29%; NF: 5%; N: 7%; P = .007), low oxygen saturation (IF: 12%; I: 32%; NF: 2%; N: 7%; P = .001), and glossocoma (IF: 15%; I: 34%; NF: 10%; N: 32%; P = .015).Respiratory complications during anesthesia emergence were higher in patients with recent preoperative URI compared to patients with healthy airways. Postoperative flumazenil could reduce the incidence of glossocoma.

Efficacy and safety of flumazenil injection for the reversal of midazolam sedation after elective outpatient endoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: Midazolam sedation during elective endoscopy is widely performed and flumazenil is frequently administered after endoscopy to reverse sedation in clinical practice. This study aimed to investigate the safety and efficacy of flumazenil injections after elective endoscopy under midazolam sedation. METHODS: Participants who underwent an upper endoscopy under midazolam sedation were randomly divided into two groups. In group I, flumazenil was administered i.v. 10 min after the patient's transfer to the recovery room, and no antidote was injected in group II. The time of stay in the recovery room and adverse events were reviewed through the nursing records. We asked the patients about their pain and degree of satisfaction according to a visual analogue scale (VAS), their memory of the procedure, mental status and the presence of uncomfortable symptoms on the day of the procedure and the day afterwards. RESULTS: The length of stay in recovery was significantly shorter in group I than in group II. No significant differences were found in the number of patients with pain (VAS ≥1), adverse events and discomfort between the two groups. Additionally, there were no differences in the patients' memory of the procedure, satisfaction with sedation, willingness to repeat the endoscopy and mental status. CONCLUSIONS: The time in the recovery room after flumazenil administration was significantly shortened, and the use of the drug did not increase the risk of adverse events or discomfort. The use of flumazenil for reversing midazolam sedation seems to be safe and effective.

Anticonvulsant effects of Senna spectabilis on seizures induced by chemicals and maximal electroshock.

Senna spectabilis (Fabaceae) is one of the medicinal plants used in Cameroon by traditional healers to treat epilepsy, constipation, insomnia, anxiety. The present study aimed to investigate the anticonvulsant effects of Senna spectabilis decoction on seizures induced by maximal electroshock (MES), pentylenetetrazole (PTZ), pilocarpine (PC) and its possible action mechanisms in animal models using flumazenil (FLU), methyl-ß-carboline-3-carboxylate (BC) and bicuculline (BIC). Senna spectabilis decoction (106.5 and 213.0mg/kg) antagonized completely tonic-clonic hind limbs of mice induced by MES. The lowest plant dose (42.6mg/kg) provided 100% of protection against seizures induced by PTZ (70mg/kg). Administration of different doses of the plant decoction antagonized seizures induced by PC up to 75%, causing a dose dependent protection and reduced significantly the mortality rate induced by this convulsant. Both FLU and BC antagonize strongly the anticonvulsant effects of this plant and are unable to reverse totally diazepam or the plant decoction effects on inhibiting seizures. The animals did not present any sign of acute toxicity even at higher doses of the plant decoction. In conclusion, Senna spectabilis possesses an anticonvulsant activity. We showed that its decoction protects significantly mice against seizures induced by chemicals and MES, delays the onset time and reduces mortality rate in seizures-induced. It also appears that the oral administration of the decoction of S. spectabilis is more active than the intraperitoneal administration of the ethanolic extract on inhibiting seizures induced by MES and PTZ. Moreover, the plant decoction could interact with GABAA complex receptor probably on the GABA and benzodiazepines sites.