Use of apixaban in adults with congenital heart disease and atrial arrhythmias: The PROTECT-AR study.

BACKGROUND: Adults with congenital heart disease (ACHD) and atrial arrhythmias (AA) face an increased risk of thromboembolic events. Limited data exist on the use of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants for thromboprophylaxis in ACHD. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of apixaban in ACHD patients with AA. METHODS: PROTECT-AR (NCT03854149) was a prospective, multicenter, observational study conducted from 2019 to 2023. ACHD patients with atrial fibrillation, atrial flutter, or intra-atrial re-entrant tachycardia on routine apixaban treatment were included. The historical control group consisted of patients previously on vitamin K antagonist (VKA), who were analyzed prior to their transition to apixaban. The primary effectiveness endpoint was the composite of stroke or thromboembolism. The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding. RESULTS: The study enrolled 218 ACHD patients with AA on apixaban, of which 73 were previous VKA users. The analysis covered 527 patient-years of prospective exposure to apixaban and 169 patient-years of retrospective exposure to VKA. The annualized rate of stroke or thromboembolism was 0.6% in the apixaban group and 1.8% in the VKA group (absolute difference - 1.2%; upper limit of one-sided 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.9%, lower than the predefined non-inferiority margin of +1.8%, Pnon-inferiority < 0.001). The annualized rate of major bleeding was 1.5% in the apixaban group and 2.4% in the VKA group (hazard ratio 0.64; 95% CI 0.19-2.10, P = 0.48). CONCLUSION: In ACHD patients with AA, routine apixaban use exhibited a non-inferior rate of stroke or thromboembolism compared to historical VKA use, alongside a similar rate of major bleeding.

When a little flutter gets a bit too exciting .

A middle-aged man with no previous cardiac history was admitted to the hospital being treated for thigh cellulitis, during his stay he developed palpitations and tachycardia which on initial ECG showed atrial flutter with a 2:1 AV block and evidence of an accessory pathway. He was subsequently given AV nodal blocking agents in the form of beta-blockers (bisoprolol) to slow his heart rate down; unfortunately, this led to hemodynamic instability due to 1:1 conduction of the atrial flutter down the accessory pathway. This case report demonstrates the importance of recognising pre-excitation on an ECG and the potential adverse effect of administering AV nodal blockade.

Gender Differences With Ibutilide Effectiveness and Safety in Cardioversion of Atrial Fibrillation.

INTRODUCTION: Few studies have examined the use of ibutilide in noncardiac surgical populations. Our study considered the effectiveness and safety of ibutilide in cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) in medical and surgical intensive care patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed for patients with a confirmed diagnosis of AF who were hemodynamically stable and received ibutilide after the initial diagnosis. Patients were administered 1 mg of ibutilide fumarate intravenous for 10 min with a second dose administered if AF persisted after 30 min. Patients were pretreated with intravenous magnesium sulfate if their blood magnesium level was <2 mg/dL. RESULTS: Fifty seven total female patients and 99 male patients received ibutilide. Females had an 88% conversion rate to normal sinus rhythm (NSR) compared to 68% in males (P = 0.008). A 70% successful return to NSR was observed in patients from all groups pretreated with magnesium sulfate (P = 0.045). One year after discharge, 74% of the patients stayed in the NSR. CONCLUSIONS: Within our population, pretreatment with magnesium sulfate followed by ibutilide was associated with increased conversion to NSR. Additionally, we noted that females had a higher conversion rate to NSR compared to males, regardless of whether they were pretreated with magnesium sulfate.

Intravenous Diltiazem Versus Metoprolol in Acute Rate Control of Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter and Rapid Ventricular Response: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized and Observational Studies.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) and/or atrial flutter (AFL) with rapid ventricular response (RVR) is a condition that often requires urgent treatment. Although guidelines have recommendations regarding chronic rate control therapy, recommendations on the best choice for acute heart rate (HR) control in RVR are unclear. METHODS: A systematic search across multiple databases was performed for studies evaluating the outcome of HR control (defined as HR less than 110 bpm and/or 20% decrease from baseline HR). Included studies evaluated AF and/or AFL with RVR in a hospital setting, with direct comparison between intravenous (IV) diltiazem and metoprolol and excluded cardiac surgery and catheter ablation patients. Hypotension (defined as systolic blood pressure less than 90 mmHg) was measured as a secondary outcome. Two authors performed full-text article review and extracted data, with a third author mediating disagreements. Random effects models utilizing inverse variance weighting were used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. RESULTS: A total of 563 unique titles were identified through the systematic search, of which 16 studies (7 randomized and 9 observational) were included. In our primary analysis of HR control by study type, IV diltiazem was found to be more effective than IV metoprolol for HR control in randomized trials (OR 4.75, 95% CI 2.50-9.04 with I2 = 14%); however, this was not found for observational studies (OR 1.26, 95% CI 0.89-1.80 with I2 = 55%). In an analysis of observational studies, there were no significant differences between the two drugs in odds of hypotension (OR 1.12, 95% CI 0.51-2.45 with I2 = 18%). CONCLUSION: While there was a trend toward improved HR control with IV diltiazem compared with IV metoprolol in randomized trials, this was not seen in observational studies, and there was no observed difference in hypotension between the two drugs.

Hypotension and respiratory events related to electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter in the emergency department.

INTRODUCTION: Electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL) is common in the ED. Our previous work showed that hypotension and respiratory events were important adverse events that occurred in patients undergoing electrical cardioversion for AF/AFL. The purpose of this study was to examine if (1) beta-blockers or calcium channel blocker use prior to ECV were associated with hypotension and (2) medications used for procedural sedation were associated with respiratory events. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of pooled study data from four previous multicentred studies on AF/AFL. We conducted a multivariable logistic regression to examine predictors of hypotension and respiratory adverse events. RESULTS: There were 1736 patients who received ECV. A hypotensive event occurred in 62 (3.6%) patients. There was no significant difference in the odds of a hypotensive event in patients who received a beta-blocker or calcium channel blocker in the ED compared to no rate control. Procedural sedation with fentanyl (OR 2.01 95% CI 1.15-3.51) and home beta-blocker use (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.14-3.21) were significantly associated with hypotensive events. A respiratory event occurred in 179 (10.3%) patients. Older age (OR 2.02, 95% CI 1.30- 3.15) and receiving midazolam for procedural sedation were found to be significantly associated with respiratory events (OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.02-3.88). CONCLUSION: Beta-blocker or calcium channel blocker use prior to ECV for AF/AFL was not associated with hypotension. However, sedation with fentanyl and home beta-blocker use was associated with hypotension. The use of midazolam for procedural sedation was significantly associated with respiratory events.

RéSUMé: INTRODUCTION: La cardioversion électrique pour la fibrillation auriculaire / flutter auriculaire (AF / AFL) est fréquente aux urgences. Nos travaux précédents ont montré que l'hypotension et les événements respiratoires étaient des événements indésirables importants qui se sont produits chez les patients subissant une cardioversion électrique pour AF / AFL. Le but de cette étude était d'examiner si 1) les bêtabloquants ou les inhibiteurs calciques utilisés avant l'ECV étaient associés à l'hypotension et 2) les médicaments utilisés pour la sédation procédurale sont associés à des événements respiratoires. MéTHODES: Il s'agissait d'une analyse secondaire des données d'études regroupées de quatre études multicentriques précédentes sur l'AF/AFL. Nous avons effectué une régression logistique multivariée pour examiner les prédicteurs de l'hypotension et des événements indésirables respiratoires. RéSULTATS: Il y avait 1736 patients qui ont reçu ECV. Un événement hypotenseur s'est produit dans 62 (3,6%) patients. Il n'y avait pas de différence significative dans la probabilité d'un événement hypotenseur chez les patients qui ont reçu un bêtabloquant ou un inhibiteur calcique à l'urgence par rapport à aucun contrôle de taux. La sédation procédurale avec du fentanyl (RC 2,01 à 95 %, IC 1,15 à 3,51) et l'utilisation de bêtabloquants à domicile (RC 1,92, IC à 95 %, 1,14 à 3,21) étaient significativement associées à des événements hypotensifs. Un événement respiratoire est survenu chez 179 (10,3 %) patients. Un âge plus avancé (RC 2,02, IC à 95 % : 1,30 à 3,15) et la réception de midazolam pour sédation procédurale étaient significativement associés à des événements respiratoires (RC 1,99, IC à 95 % 1,02-3,88). CONCLUSIONS: L'utilisation d'un bêtabloquant ou d'un inhibiteur calcique avant l'ECV pour l'AF/AFL n'était pas associée à l'hypotension. Cependant, la sédation avec du fentanyl et l'utilisation de bêtabloquants à domicile étaient associées à l'hypotension. L'utilisation du midazolam pour la sédation procédurale était significativement associée aux événements respiratoires.

Medical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter with class IC antiarrhythmic drugs in young patients with and without congenital heart disease.

INTRODUCTION: The use of flecainide and propafenone for medical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter/intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia (IART) is well-described in adults without congenital heart disease (CHD). Data are sparse regarding their use for the same purpose in adults with CHD and in adolescent patients with anatomically normal hearts and we sought to describe the use of class IC drugs in this population and identify factors associated with decreased likelihood of success. METHODS: Single center retrospective cohort study of patients who received oral flecainide or propafenone for medical cardioversion of AF or IART from 2000 to 2022. The unit of analysis was each episode of AF/IART. We performed a time-to-sinus rhythm analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model clustering on the patient to identify factors associated with increased likelihood of success. RESULTS: We identified 45 episodes involving 41 patients. As only episodes of AF were successfully cardioverted with medical therapy, episodes of IART were excluded from our analyses. Use of flecainide was the only factor associated with increased likelihood of success. There was a statistically insignificant trend toward decreased likelihood of success in patients with CHD. CONCLUSIONS: Flecainide was more effective than propafenone. We did not detect a difference in rate of conversion to sinus rhythm between patients with and without CHD and were likely underpowered to do so, however, there was a trend toward decreased likelihood of success in patients with CHD. That said, medical therapy was effective in >50% of patients with CHD with AF.

The diagnostic and therapeutic challenge of atrial flutter in children: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Palpitations represent a common cause for consultation in the pediatric Emergency Department (ED). Unlike adults, palpitations in children are less frequently dependent from the heart, recognizing other causes. CASE PRESENTATION: A 11-year-old male came to our pediatric ED for epigastric pain, vomiting and palpitations. During the previous 6 month the patient was affected by SARS-CoV-2 (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus). Electrocardiogram (ECG) revealed supraventricular tachycardia. Therefore, adenosine was administered unsuccessfully. The administration of adenosine, however, allowed us to make diagnosis of atypical atrial flutter. Multiple attempts at both electrical cardioversion, transesophageal atrial overdrive, and drug monotherapy were unsuccessful in our patient. Consequently, a triple therapy with amiodarone, flecainide, and beta-blocker was gradually designed to control the arrhythmic pattern with the restoration of a left upper atrial rhythm. There was not any evidence of sinus rhythm in the patient clinical history. CONCLUSIONS: The present study underlines the rarity of this type of dysrhythmia in childhood and the difficulties in diagnosis and management, above all in a patient who has never showed sinus rhythm. Raising awareness of all available treatment options is essential for a better management of dysrhythmia in children.

What Is the Optimal Digoxin Level? Challenging Case of Fetal Atrial Flutter Treatment in a Monochorionic Diamniotic Twin.

Background: Atrial flutter is an infrequent yet potentially fatal arrhythmia. Digoxin is the preferred first-line treatment for fetal atrial flutter due to its efficacy and favorable safety profile. The optimal digoxin serum target level for neonatal atrial flutter management remains uncertain, with the standard target level ranging from 1.0 to 2.0 ng/mL due to potential toxicity concerns above this threshold. Case Presentation: We present a case of atrial flutter in a fetus within a monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancy that was successfully managed using a higher-than-standard target level of digoxin. A 34-year-old nulliparous woman was referred to our institution at 31 + 3 weeks of gestation due to fetal distress in an MCDA twin pregnancy. Fetal echocardiography revealed a ventricular rate of 214 bpm in twin A, while twin B exhibited no abnormal findings. Conclusions: Our case highlights a distinct correlation between the serum digoxin level and its impact on atrial flutter. A higher target serum level of digoxin may be necessary to achieve sinus conversion due to the unique maternal and fetal circulatory characteristics in MCDA pregnancies.

Intrauterine management and outcomes of persistent fetal atrial flutter: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Fetal atrial flutter (AF), accounting for 30% of all fetal tachyarrhythmias, predominantly (over 80%) manifests as a 2:1 atrioventricular conduction. Swift referral and timely intervention become imperative in instances of severe persistent arrhythmia. CASE PRESENTATION: We discuss the case of a 32-year-old multiparous Chinese woman, at 30+2 weeks of gestation, wherein an ultrasonographic examination revealed persistent fetal AF (atrial rate ranging from 219 to 445 beats/min and ventricular rate from 219 to 228 beats/min, with a 2:1 or 1:1 down transmission) and minor ascites. Despite the maternal ingestion of digoxin and sotalol, the fetal heart rhythm remained uncorrected. Following this, at 32+3 weeks of gestation, an intramuscular injection of cedilanid, guided by ultrasound, was administered to the fetus. Postoperatively, the fetal ventricular rate demonstrated a decline after 6 days, and the ascites resolved. Subsequently, at 33+3 weeks, a cesarean section was necessitated due to maternal intolerance to the medication, resulting in the delivery of the infant. Remarkably, the infant's cardiac rhythm spontaneously converted to sinus rhythm within 5 min of birth. A follow-up conducted 1 year postpartum revealed no recurrence of AF. CONCLUSIONS: This case illustrates that in the event of transplacental drug treatment failure, intrauterine therapeutic intervention should be considered. Moreover, it highlights the encouraging prognosis associated with fetal AF, as the cardiac rhythm spontaneously reverted to sinus rhythm postbirth in this instance.

Failure of diltiazem to prevent 1:1 conduction of atrial flutter: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Atrial flutter with 1:1 conduction to the ventricles is a dangerous cardiac arrhythmia. Contemporary guidelines recommend atrioventricular nodal blocking agents should be co-administered with class 1C anti-arrhythmics, as prophylaxis against 1:1 flutter. No guidance is provided on the type or strength of atrioventricular nodal blockade required, and in practice, these agents are frequently prescribed at low dose, or even omitted, due to their side effect profile. CASE PRESENTATION: A 62 year old Caucasian man with a history of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation treated with flecainide, presented with atrial flutter with 1:1 conduction to the ventricles and was cardioverted. Diltiazem was added to prevent this complication and he again presented with atrial flutter with 1:1 conduction to the ventricles, despite prophylaxis with coadministration of diltiazem. CONCLUSIONS: This case report demonstrates failure of diltiazem to prevent 1:1 flutter in a patient chronically treated with flecainide for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Early initiation of anti-relapse antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and flutter after pharmacological cardioversion with refralon.

Aim      Evaluating the efficacy and safety of early administration of antirecurrence antiarrhythmic therapy (AAT) following restoration of sinus rhythm (SR) with refralon.Aim      Evaluating the efficacy and safety of early administration of antirecurrence antiarrhythmic therapy (AAT) following restoration of sinus rhythm (SR) with refralon.Material and methods  The study included 247 patients with atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL) (142 men) who underwent pharmacological cardioversion (PCV) with refralon. A 4-step schedule of drug administration was used (successive intravenous infusions at doses of 5, 5, 10, and 10 µg/kg; maximum total dose was 30 µg/kg). Patients who recovered SR and had no contraindications were prescribed antirecurrence AAT in the early (≤24 h; n=101) or delayed (≥24 h; n=95) period. Lappaconitine hydrobromide, propafenone, and sotalol were administered orally as the antirecurrence therapy. The decision on the time of initiating ATT and the choice of the drug and its dose was taken by the attending physician individually. The safety criteria included a prolonged PQ interval >200 ms; second- or third-degree atrioventricular block; QRS complex duration >120 ms; QT prolongation >500 ms; and heartbeat pauses >3 s. The efficacy criteria included the absence of sustained recurrence of AF/AFL after initiation of AAT and the duration of hospitalization after PCV. Patients were followed up during the study until they were discharged from the hospital.Results SR was recovered in 229 (92.7 %) patients. In the group of early AAT initiation, a PQ duration >200 ms was observed in 8 (7.9 %) patients, whereas in the group of delayed AAT initiation, in 7 patients (7.4 %; p=1.000). A wide QRS complex >120 ms was recorded in 1 (1.1 %) patient of the delayed AAT initiation group and in none of the patients of the early AAT initiation group (p=0.485). Ventricular arrhythmogenic effects and QT prolongation >500 ms were not detected in any patient. Numbers of early AF recurrence did not differ in the groups of early and delayed AAT initiation: 6 (5.9 %) vs. 5 (5.3 %), respectively (p=1.000). Median duration of hospitalization after PCV was 4 days in the group of early AAT initiation and 5 days in the group of delayed AAT initiation (р=0.009).Conclusion      Early initiation of the refralon AAT does not increase the risk of drug adverse effects and reduces the duration of stay in the hospital.

Implementation of an integrated emergency department acute atrial fibrillation pathway safely reduces cardioversions and hospitalisations: A comparative pre-post study.

OBJECTIVE: Atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF/AFL) accounts for high rates of ED presentations and hospital admissions. There is increasing evidence to suggest that delaying cardioversion for acute uncomplicated AF is safe, and that many patients will spontaneously revert to sinus rhythm (SR). We conducted a before-and-after evaluation of AF/AFL management after a change in ED pathway using a conservative 'rate-and-wait' approach, incorporating next working day outpatient clinic follow-up and delayed cardioversion if required. METHODS: We performed a before-and-after retrospective cohort study examining outcomes for patients who presented to the ED in Christchurch, New Zealand, with acute uncomplicated AF/AFL in the 1-year period before and after the implementation of a new conservative management pathway. RESULTS: A total of 360 patients were included in the study (182 'Pre-pathway' vs 178 'Post-Pathway'). Compared to the pre-pathway cohort, those managed under the new pathway had an 81.2% reduction in ED cardioversions (n = 32 vs n = 6), and 50.7% reduction in all cardioversions (n = 65 vs n = 32). There was a 31.6% reduction in admissions from ED (n = 54 vs n = 79). ED length of stay (3.9 h vs 3.8 h, net difference -0.1 h, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.6 to 0.3), 1-year ED AF representation (32.4% vs 26.4%, net difference -6.0% [95% CI -16.0% to 3.9%]), 1-year ED ischaemic stroke presentation (2.2% in both groups) and 7-day all-cause mortality rates (hazard ratio 1.05 [95% CI 0.6 to 1.9]) were all similar. CONCLUSIONS: Using a conservative 'rate-and-wait' strategy with early follow-up for patients presenting to ED with AF/AFL can safely reduce unnecessary cardioversions and avoidable hospitalisations.

Treatment, not delivery, of the late preterm and term fetus with supraventricular arrhythmia.

OBJECTIVE: While in-utero treatment of sustained fetal supraventricular arrhythmia (SVA) is standard practice in the previable and preterm fetus, data are limited on best practice for late preterm (34 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks), early term (37 + 0 to 38 + 6 weeks) and term (> 39 weeks) fetuses with SVA. We reviewed the delivery and postnatal outcomes of fetuses at ≥ 35 weeks of gestation undergoing treatment rather than immediate delivery. METHODS: This was a retrospective case series of fetuses presenting at ≥ 35 weeks of gestation with sustained SVA and treated transplacentally at six institutions between 2012 and 2022. Data were collected on gestational age at presentation and delivery, SVA diagnosis (short ventriculoatrial (VA) tachycardia, long VA tachycardia or atrial flutter), type of antiarrhythmic medication used, interval between treatment and conversion to sinus rhythm and postnatal SVA recurrence. RESULTS: Overall, 37 fetuses presented at a median gestational age of 35.7 (range, 35.0-39.7) weeks with short VA tachycardia (n = 20), long VA tachycardia (n = 7) or atrial flutter (n = 10). Four (11%) fetuses were hydropic. In-utero treatment led to restoration of sinus rhythm in 35 (95%) fetuses at a median of 2 (range, 1-17) days; this included three of the four fetuses with hydrops. Antiarrhythmic medications included flecainide (n = 11), digoxin (n = 7), sotalol (n = 11) and dual therapy (n = 8). Neonates were liveborn at 36-41 weeks via spontaneous vaginal delivery (23/37 (62%)) or Cesarean delivery (14/37 (38%)). Cesarean delivery was indicated for fetal SVA in two fetuses, atrial ectopy or sinus bradycardia in three fetuses and obstetric reasons in nine fetuses that were in sinus rhythm at the time of delivery. Twenty-one (57%) cases were treated for recurrent SVA after birth. CONCLUSION: In-utero treatment of the near term and term (≥ 35-week) SVA fetus is highly successful even in the presence of hydrops, with the majority of cases delivered vaginally closer to term, thereby avoiding unnecessary Cesarean section. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Effect of dronedarone vs. placebo on atrial fibrillation progression: a post hoc analysis from ATHENA trial.

AIMS: This post hoc analysis of the ATHENA trial (NCT00174785) assessed the effect of dronedarone on the estimated burden of atrial fibrillation (AF)/atrial flutter (AFL) progression to presumed permanent AF/AFL, and regression to sinus rhythm (SR), compared with placebo. METHODS AND RESULTS: The burden of AF/AFL was estimated by a modified Rosendaal method using available electrocardiograms (ECG). Cumulative incidence of permanent AF/AFL (defined as ≥6 months of AF/AFL until end of study) or permanent SR (defined as ≥6 months of SR until end of study) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. A log-rank test was used to assess statistical significance. Hazard ratios (HRs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a Cox model, adjusted for treatment group. Of the 4439 patients included in this analysis, 2208 received dronedarone, and 2231 placebo. Baseline and clinical characteristics were well balanced between groups. Overall, 304 (13.8%) dronedarone-treated patients progressed to permanent AF/AFL compared with 455 (20.4%) treated with placebo (P < 0.0001). Compared with those receiving placebo, patients receiving dronedarone had a lower cumulative incidence of permanent AF/AFL (log-rank P < 0.001; HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.56-0.75), a higher cumulative incidence of permanent SR (log-rank P < 0.001; HR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.09-1.29), and a lower estimated AF/AFL burden over time (P < 0.01 from Day 14 to Month 21). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that dronedarone could be a useful antiarrhythmic drug for early rhythm control due to less AF/AFL progression and more regression to SR vs. placebo, potentially reflecting reverse remodeling. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00174785.

Impact of intravenous calcium with diltiazem for atrial fibrillation/flutter in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of early intravenous (IV) calcium on systolic blood pressure (SBP) when administered with IV diltiazem in subjects with atrial fibrillation (AF) or flutter (AFL) with rapid ventricular response (RVR) in the Emergency Department (ED). METHODS: This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study that evaluated adults admitted to the ED with documented AF or AFL, heart rate (HR) > 120 bpm, SBP 90 to 140 mmHg, and received treatment with IV diltiazem for rate control. The primary outcome was the change in SBP 60 min (+/- 30 min) after initial IV diltiazem administration. Secondary outcomes included time to initial rate control (HR < 100 bpm), time to sustained rate control (HR < 100 bpm for 3 h), change in HR, rates of hypotension, bradycardia, hypercalcemia, and line extravasation within 24 h of initial diltiazem administration. RESULTS: There were 198 subjects in the diltiazem monotherapy group and 56 subjects in the diltiazem with calcium group meeting the inclusion criteria. The primary outcome, median change in SBP 60 min after initial IV diltiazem administration, was similar between groups (-2 mmHg vs -1.5 mmHg; p = 0.642), but this difference was not statistically significant. All secondary outcomes were found to be similar between groups. Although not statistically significant, hypotension occurred more often in the diltiazem with calcium group (20.2% vs 32.1%; p = 0.060) while bradycardia occurred more often in the diltiazem monotherapy group (4.5% vs 0%; p = 0.213). In terms of achieving rate control, the administration of calcium with diltiazem did not significantly change the time to initial rate control (1.4 h vs 1.8 h; p = 0.141) or time to sustained rate control (7.9 h vs 7.7 h; p = 0.570) compared to diltiazem alone. CONCLUSIONS: In the setting of AF/AFL with RVR, administration of IV calcium with IV diltiazem did not show a significant impact on clinical or safety outcomes compared to IV diltiazem monotherapy.

Association between sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and incident atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter (AFL) are associated with adverse outcomes in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We investigated the effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on the incidence of AF and/or AFL in HFrEF patients. PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched until March 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that enrolled patients with HFrEF. A total of six RCTs with 9467 patients were included (N = 4731 in the SGLT2i arms; N = 4736 in the placebo arms). Compared to placebo, SGLT2i treatment was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of AF [relative risk (RR) 0.62, 95% confidence interval CI 0.44-0.86; P = 0.005] and AF/AFL (RR 0.64, 95% CI 0.47-0.87; P = 0.004). Subgroup analysis showed that empagliflozin use resulted in a significant reduction in the risk of AF (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.34-0.89; P = 0.01) and AF/AFL (RR 0.50, 95% CI 0.32-0.77; P = 0.002). By contrast, dapagliflozin use was not associated with a significant reduction in the risk of AF (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.43-1.11; P = 0.12) or AF/AFL (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.53-1.27; P = 0.38). Additionally, a "shorter" duration (< 1.5 years) of treatment with SGLT2i remained associated with a reduction in the risk of AF (< 1.5 years; RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.36-0.91; P = 0.02) and AF/AFL (< 1.5 years; RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.34-0.80; P = 0.003). In conclusion, SGLT2i therapy was associated with a significant reduction in the risk of AF and AF/AFL in patients with HFrEF. These results reinforce the value of using SGLT2i in this setting.

Management of atrial flutter and atrial fibrillation with rapid ventricular response in patients with acute decompensated heart failure: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and nonpharmacological management options for atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter with rapid ventricular response (AFRVR) in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) in the acute care setting. METHODS: This study was a systematic review of observational studies or randomized clinical trials (RCT) of adult patients with AFRVR and concomitant ADHF in the emergency department (ED), intensive care unit, or step-down unit. The primary effectiveness outcome was successful rate or rhythm control. Safety outcomes were adverse events, such as symptomatic hypotension and venous thromboembolism. RESULTS: A total of 6577 unique articles were identified. Five studies met inclusion criteria: one RCT in the inpatient setting and four retrospective studies, two in the ED and the other three in the inpatient setting. In the RCT of diltiazem versus placebo, 22 patients (100%) in the treatment group had a therapeutic response compared to 0/15 (0%) in the placebo group, with no significant safety differences between the two groups. For three of the observational studies, data were limited. One observation study showed no difference between metoprolol and diltiazem for successful rate control, but worsening heart failure symptoms occurred more frequently in those receiving diltiazem compared to metoprolol (19 patients [33%] vs. 10 patients [15%], p = 0.019). A single study included electrical cardioversion (one patient exposed with failure to convert to sinus rhythm) as nonpharmacological management. The overall risk of bias for included studies ranged from serious to critical. Missing data and heterogeneity of definitions for effectiveness and safety outcomes precluded the combination of results for quantitative meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: High-level evidence to inform clinical decision making regarding effective and safe management of AFRVR in patients with ADHF in the acute care setting is lacking.