Comparison Of Frequency Of Post Operative Sensitivity In Amalgam Restorations Using Copal Varnish And Dentin Adhesive Liner.

BACKGROUND: Micro leakage around the margins of a restoration is believed to be one of the main causes of postoperative sensitivity. Dental amalgam is a non-insulating material and has the potential to transfer heat and cold causing irritation of the pulp. Different dentin tubule sealers are used under amalgam restoration to compensate for this post-operative sensitivity. This study was conducted to compare the frequency of sensitivity in amalgam restorations using copal varnish and dentin adhesive liner (dentin bonding agent). METHODS: A total of 60 patients of either gender, aged 18-40 years having class 1 carries in posterior teeth were included. Teeth with restorations, dentinal sensitivity and patients taking analgesic drugs for chronic pain conditions were excluded. The selected patients were placed randomly into Group A (copal varnish) & Group B (dentin adhesive liner), by using computer generated table of random numbers. Restored teeth were evaluated 1-month post operatively for sensitivity. RESULTS: Mean age was 25.63±5.42 years. Out of 60 patients, 68.0% were females and 32.0% were males with a female to male ratio of 2:1. The mean post-operative pain score was 2.83±2.79 in Group A and in Group B, it was 1.43±2.14 with a p-value of 0.03. There was no pain on application of a cold stimulus in 14 (46.7%) patients in Group A (copal varnish) while in Group B (Dentin adhesive), no pain was seen in 23 (76.7%) patients with p-value of 0.02. CONCLUSIONS: This study concluded that dentin adhesive liner (dentin bonding agent) is better than copal varnish in reducing postoperative sensitivity in amalgam restorations.

Use of lining materials under posterior resin composite restorations in the UK.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate opinions on, and current use of lining materials prior to the placement of posterior resin composite restorations by general dental practitioners (GDPs) in the UK. A further objective was to investigate aspects of posterior resin composite restoration placement techniques employed by UK GDPs. METHODS: A questionnaire was devised to gain the information sought. It was sent to 500 UK dentists, chosen at random from the register of the General Dental Council. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty four replies were received, which gave a response rate of 71%. Eighty two percent of respondents reported placing lining materials in deep cavities to be restored with resin composite. Regarding moderately deep cavities, half of the respondents indicated a preference to place a lining material, whilst 44% were not sure if a lining was required. The remaining 6% did not respond to the question. Of the respondents, 39% reported that they did not place lining materials in shallow cavities. Regarding techniques for posterior resin composite placement, two-step etch and rinse systems were the most common adhesive bonding systems used (60%). The majority of respondents (80%) reported not using rubber dam when restoring posterior teeth with resin composite. CONCLUSIONS: There was considerable confusion about the need to place a lining prior to resin composite restorations placement in moderate depth and shallow cavities, whilst most favoured the placement of a lining in deep posterior cavities. The majority of GDPs may not routinely use rubber dam for the placement of posterior resin composite restorations. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Decision making and operative techniques for cavity linings under posterior composite restorations in moderately deep and deep cavities is contentious among dentists, resulting in a need to generate more convincing, practice-relevant data on the use of lining materials to inform the dental profession.

Cavity lining after excavating caries lesions: meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of randomized clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES: After removal of dentine caries lesions, cavity lining has been advocated. Non-clinical data support this approach, but clinical data are sparse and ambiguous. We aimed at evaluating the benefits and harms of cavity lining using meta-analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis. DATA: We included randomized clinical trials comparing restorations without versus with cavity lining for treating primary caries lesions. Only trials reporting failure (defined as need to re-retreat) after ≥1 year follow-up were included. Trial selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment were conducted independently by two reviewers. We conducted random-effects intention-to-treat and per-protocol meta-analyses, and Trial Sequential Analysis to control for random errors. SOURCES: Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL) were systematically screened, and hand searches and cross-referencing performed. STUDY SELECTION: From 128 studies, three randomized trials (89/130 patients or teeth), all treating primary teeth, were included. The trials had high risk of bias. All trials compared no lining versus calcium hydroxide lining after selective caries removal followed by adhesive restoration. Follow-up was 36 to 53 months. Restoring the cavity without lining did not significantly affect the risk of failure (intention-to-treat relative risk (RR) (95% confidence interval) 0.71 (0.49-1.04), per-protocol RR 0.52 (0.24-1.10). According to Trial Sequential Analysis, no firm evidence was reached. The quality of evidence was very low. CONCLUSIONS: Strong recommendations for using cavity liners are unsubstantiated, but firm evidence for omitting lining is also unavailable. Our findings apply only to primary teeth and calcium hydroxide liner. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Whilst lining is frequently performed in dental practice, very few randomized clinical trials investigated this issue. The three trials included in this review treated deciduous teeth and did not find lining with calcium hydroxide beneficial. Lining is not supported by sufficient clinical evidence.

Cluster Effects in a National Dental PBRN restorative study.

Items in clusters, such as patients of the same clinician or teeth within the same patient, tend to be more similar than items from different groups. This within-group similarity, represented by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), reduces precision, yielding less statistical power and wider confidence intervals, compared with non-clustered samples of the same size. This must be considered in the design of studies including clusters. We present ICC estimates from a study of 7,826 restorations placed in previously unrestored tooth surfaces of 4,672 patients by 222 clinicians in the National Dental Practice-Based Research Network, as a resource for sample size planning in restorative studies. Our findings suggest that magnitudes of ICCs in practice-based research can be substantial. These can have large effects on precision and the power to detect treatment effects. Generally, we found relatively large ICCs for characteristics that are influenced by clinician choice (e.g., 0.36 for rubber dam use). ICCs for outcomes within individual patients, such as tooth surfaces affected by a caries lesion, tended to be smaller (from 0.03 to 0.15), but were still sufficiently large to substantially affect statistical power. Clustering should be taken into account in the design of oral health studies and derivation of statistical power estimates for these studies (ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00847470).

Patient risk factors' influence on survival of posterior composites.

This practice-based retrospective study evaluated the survival of resin composite restorations in posterior teeth, focusing on the influence of potential patient risk factors. In total, 306 posterior composite restorations placed in 44 adult patients were investigated after 10 to 18 yrs. The history of each restoration was extracted from the dental records, and a clinical evaluation was performed with those still in situ. The patient risk status was assessed for caries and "occlusal-stress" (bruxism-related). Statistical analysis was performed by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox-regression multivariate analysis. In total, 30% of the restorations failed, of which 82% were found in patients with 1 or 2 risk factors. Secondary caries was the main reason of failure within caries-risk patients, whereas fracture was the main reason in "occlusal-stress-risk" patients. The patient variables gender and age did not significantly affect survival, but risk did (p < .001). Tooth type (p < .001), arch (p = .013), and pulpal vitality (p = .003) significantly affected restoration survival. Within the limits of this retrospective evaluation, the survival of restorations is affected by patient risk factors, which should be included in survival analyses of restorations.

Restoration materials for primary molars-results from a European survey.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to obtain an overview of the materials and restorative techniques taught for Class I and Class II restorations in primary molars of different European departments for paediatric dentistry and to compare the results to those for North America. METHODS: The forms were sent to the chairmen of the departments of paediatric dentistry or-when included into the department for operative dentistry-to the director of 200 universities in 32 European Countries. The questions concerned the preferred materials and techniques, as well as the indications or contraindications for the use of the different tooth coloured materials. RESULTS: Forty-three percent of the universities from western European countries (excluding Germany) responded to the survey. A 97% answer rate was obtained from German Schools. Of the other European regions, the response rate varied remarkably (24-54%). Also, opinions on materials used and methods applied were different from country to country. Only in a few regions (Eastern Europe), amalgam remains the filling material of first choice for Class I and II cavities in primary molars, whereas in others, the use has been restricted and tooth coloured materials, especially compomers or resin-modified glass ionomer cements, are being preferred. CONCLUSIONS: Great diversity in teaching was observed not only among the European countries, but also within the countries themselves which makes it difficult to compare the results of our study to the ones obtained from the US.

Clinical performance of bonded amalgam restorations at 42 months.

BACKGROUND: Despite a lack of data based on clinical research, many positive characteristics have been attributed to the placement of amalgam restorations with an adhesive resin liner. METHODS: For 42 months, and authors followed two groups of subjects who had amalgam restorations placed in a previous study. In this double-blind study, these subjects had been randomly assigned to have amalgam restorations placed with an adhesive liner or with a copal varnish placed under all restorations and a bulk base of zinc phosphate cement for deeper lesions. The authors evaluated anatomical form, marginal adaptation, retention and the presence of secondary caries at six, 18, 30 and 42 months. RESULTS: At 42 months, the authors found that all restorations in both groups still were retained, were free of secondary caries and were rated clinically acceptable. No difference between the groups was found for any category (P > .05; analysis). CONCLUSIONS: Placement of amalgam restorations with adhesive liners was found to produce results equivalent to that of traditional methods over a 42-month period. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Practitioners wary of using new methods that have not undergone thorough clinical testing can feel comfortable placing adhesive liners under amalgam restorations.

Surface quality achieved by polishing and by varnishing of temporary crown and fixed partial denture resins.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Studies have suggested that coating a temporary restoration with varnish material could replace time-consuming polishing procedures needed for achieving an optimally smooth surface. PURPOSE: This study examined the surface roughness of acrylic resins after having been polished or coated with different varnish materials. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 360 cylindrical specimens were fabricated from 9 brands of resin. One surface on each specimen was machined flat and subsequently either polished with rubber polishers or coated with 1 of 9 varnishes. Selected specimens were subjected to thermal cycling (5 degrees C to 55 degrees C, 2000 cycles). Surface quality was assessed by means of a profilometer and by SEM examination. RESULTS: Polished specimens had average surface roughness values (Ra) of 0.8 microm; differences in roughness between materials were small, but statistically significant. Type of coating had a significant influence on surface quality. Depending on the combination of materials used, the coating produced both smoother and rougher surfaces than polishing (0.4 microm < Ra < 4.6 microm). Five coatings were deemed not to be clinically applicable because of poor wetting properties. Thermal cycling did not significantly influence surface quality, but caused minute cracks in the cyanoacrylate coating. CONCLUSION: In regard to surface quality and applicability, the use of varnishes on temporary restorations is not advisable.

[The marginal permeability of fillings made from different filling materials in the early periods of treatment]. / Kraevaia pronitsaemost' plomb iz razlichnykh plombirovochnykh materialov v rannie sroki lecheniia.

Different composite and compound filling materials have been compared on the basis of objective and precise quantitative method 5-10 min after filling installation. The materials with a less apparent marginal permeability have been determined. We have studied the following filling materials: "Kompodent", "Simulate", "Charisma", "Heliomolar" using electrometric method. Statistical analysis of our results has shown that the best hermetic properties are demonstrated by "Charisma", and "Stomadent" steady and stable fillings are made of "Heliomolar" as well as "Simulate" and "Kompodent".

Marginal leakage of amalgam restorations pretreated with various liners.

PURPOSE: To evaluate and compare the microleakage of amalgam restorations lined with four different liners. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cylindrical occlusal cavities were prepared in extracted human molars and the teeth were then divided into four groups and lined with one of four liners: Amalcoden, AM (glass-metal ionomer), FujiDuet, FD (glass ionomer), Amalgambond, AB (adhesive resin), or copal varnish, CV. Each cavity was then restored with a high-copper amalgam alloy and aged for 7 days in 37 degrees C distilled water. The specimens were then thermocycled for 300 cycles followed by immersion in 0.5% basic fuchsin dye solution for 24 hours. The teeth were then embedded in resin, sectioned, and dye penetration at the tooth/amalgam interface evaluated microscopically at x 100 and scored from 0 to 4 (0 = no leakage and 4 = greatest leakage). RESULTS: The median values were: AM = 1.0; FD = 0.5; AB = 1.1; and CV = 4.0. Statistical analysis using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U indicated no significant differences between AM and AB or FD and AB. CV was however, significantly worse at P < 0.01.

Effect of Cervitec varnish on the salivary Streptococcus mutans levels in the patients with fixed orthodontic appliances.

The aim of the present study was to assess the efficiency of a 1% chlorhexidine-containing varnish (Cervitec, Vivadent, Liechtenstein) on the levels of Streptococcus mutans in saliva of patients with fixed orthodontic appliances using the Dentocult-SM (Vivadent, Liechtenstein) technique for the microbiological investigation. Eighty subjects participated in the study and, divided randomly into two equal groups in which one group was treated with the placebo varnish (Vivadent, Liechtenstein) for negative controls. Streptococcus mutans in saliva of the subject was sampled and enumerated by using the Dentocult-SM dip-slide technique for periods of one, two four and twelve weeks after a single varnish application. The results were evaluated statistically. After the chlorhexidine containing varnish treatment the levels of Streptococcus mutans in saliva were significantly reduced after one week (p < 0.01) and continued reduction for one month (p < 0.05). After twelve weeks Streptococcus mutans levels in saliva were given a relative increase. No significant suppression was found in the placebo group (p > 0.05). The results suggested that Cervitec varnish reduces salivary Streptococcus mutans levels and that the application should be repeated every 3 months to get antibacterial effect.

Teaching the use of bases and liners: a survey of North American dental schools.

The authors surveyed 64 dental schools in North America about their instruction on the use of bases and liners. Respondents cited the materials being taught at the time of the survey, two years before the survey and four years before the survey. There was no consensus as to the materials being used. Copal varnishes and dentin bonding agents, or DBAs, were used most often in Class II preparations more than 2 millimeters from the pulp, and glass ionomers and DBAs were equally popular for Class II preparations within 1 mm of the pulp. Most schools were pleased with the materials they are currently teaching but continue to review material selection annually.

A survey of current practice into the use of aesthetic inlays.

In recent years there has been a concerted effort to produce an aesthetic restoration to replace amalgam, while retaining its qualities of strength and longevity. The use of porcelains and composite resins used indirectly as inlays and onlays has today improved the qualities of directly filled composites. A survey of 310 general dental practitioners in the UK known to use this type of restoration produced 162 responses to a questionnaire to evaluate their experiences to these techniques. The majority, 85%, had used a composite inlay system for about 2 years, with a 90% success rate over this period. Information collected provided details on variations in cavity design and cementing procedures.

Permeabilidad de barnices cavitarios: estudio in vitro / Permeability of cavity varnishes: in vitro study

Los varnices cavitarios vienen usándose hace tiempo en la profesión odontológica en cavidades operatorias de amalgamas, para disminuir la infiltración marginal debido a la mala adaptación inicial de ellas, y evitar la tinción del diente por la corrosión del metal. Se estudiaron 3 barnices (Copalite, Derfla, Silicate varnish y barniz cavitario Hertz), determinñandose la permeabilidad de ellos a un colorante (azul de metileno 1 por ciento en solución acuosa) medida a la 1ª hora de su aplicación en cavidades simuladas en yeso extraduro saturado con humedad; el grado de permeabilidad fue determinado analizando la penetración del colorante medida en superficie, para cada tipo de material y un grupo control sin barniz. Los valores promedio en mm² de área de infiltración a la 1ª hora fueron de 77.7 para Derfla, 115.6 para Hertz, 127.8 para Copalite, y 127.2 para el grupo Control, encontrándose diferencias estadísticamente significativas entr Derfla y los otros grupos