RESUMO
This section explores the challenges involved in translating genomic research into genomic medicine. A number of priorities have been identified in the Australian National Health Genomics Framework for addressing these challenges. Responsible collection, storage, use and management of genomic data is one of these priorities, and is the primary theme of this section. The recent release of Genomical, an Australian data-sharing platform, is used as a case study to illustrate the type of assistance that can be provided to the health care sector in addressing this priority. The section first describes the National Framework and other drivers involved in the move towards genomic medicine. The section then examines key ethical, legal and social factors at play in genomics, with particular focus on privacy and consent. Finally, the section examines how Genomical is being used to help ensure that the move towards genomic medicine is ethically, legally and socially sound and that it optimises advances in both genomic and information technology.
Assuntos
Genômica , Disseminação de Informação , Humanos , Genômica/legislação & jurisprudência , Genômica/ética , Austrália , Disseminação de Informação/legislação & jurisprudência , Disseminação de Informação/ética , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido/legislação & jurisprudência , Privacidade Genética/legislação & jurisprudência , Confidencialidade/legislação & jurisprudênciaRESUMO
Here, we examine the challenges posed by laws in the United States and China for generative-AI-assisted genomic research collaboration. We recommend renewing the Agreement on Cooperation in Science and Technology to promote responsible principles for sharing human genomic data and to enhance transparency in research.
Assuntos
Inteligência Artificial , Genômica , China , Humanos , Genômica/legislação & jurisprudência , Estados Unidos , Inteligência Artificial/legislação & jurisprudênciaRESUMO
With the introduction of Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) techniques increasing numbers of disease-associated variants are being identified. This ongoing progress might lead to diagnoses in formerly undiagnosed patients and novel insights in already solved cases. Therefore, many studies suggest introducing systematic reanalysis of NGS data in routine diagnostics. Introduction will, however, also have ethical, economic, legal and (psycho)social (ELSI) implications that Genetic Health Professionals (GHPs) from laboratories should consider before possible implementation of systematic reanalysis. To get a first impression we performed a scoping literature review. Our findings show that for the vast majority of included articles ELSI aspects were not mentioned as such. However, often these issues were raised implicitly. In total, we identified nine ELSI aspects, such as (perceived) professional responsibilities, implications for consent and cost-effectiveness. The identified ELSI aspects brought forward necessary trade-offs for GHPs to consciously take into account when considering responsible implementation of systematic reanalysis of NGS data in routine diagnostics, balancing the various strains on their laboratories and personnel while creating optimal results for new and former patients. Some important aspects are not well explored yet. For example, our study shows GHPs see the values of systematic reanalysis but also experience barriers, often mentioned as being practical or financial only, but in fact also being ethical or psychosocial. Engagement of these GHPs in further research on ELSI aspects is important for sustainable implementation.
Assuntos
Testes Genéticos , Humanos , Testes Genéticos/ética , Testes Genéticos/economia , Testes Genéticos/legislação & jurisprudência , Testes Genéticos/normas , Testes Genéticos/métodos , Sequenciamento de Nucleotídeos em Larga Escala/ética , Genômica/ética , Genômica/legislação & jurisprudência , Genômica/métodos , Laboratórios ClínicosAssuntos
Genômica , Disseminação de Informação , Microbiologia , Virulência , Organização Mundial da Saúde , Genômica/ética , Genômica/legislação & jurisprudência , Disseminação de Informação/ética , Disseminação de Informação/legislação & jurisprudência , Microbiologia/ética , Microbiologia/legislação & jurisprudência , Virulência/genética , HumanosRESUMO
Globally, 15,521 animal species are listed as threatened by the International Union for the Conservation of Nature, and of these less than 3% have genomic resources that can inform conservation management. To combat this, global genome initiatives are developing genomic resources, yet production of a reference genome alone does not conserve a species. The reference genome allows us to develop a suite of tools to understand both genome-wide and functional diversity within and between species. Conservation practitioners can use these tools to inform their decision-making. But, at present there is an implementation gap between the release of genome information and the use of genomic data in applied conservation by conservation practitioners. In May 2020, we launched the Threatened Species Initiative and brought a consortium of genome biologists, population biologists, bioinformaticians, population geneticists, and ecologists together with conservation agencies across Australia, including government, zoos, and nongovernment organizations. Our objective is to create a foundation of genomic data to advance our understanding of key Australian threatened species, and ultimately empower conservation practitioners to access and apply genomic data to their decision-making processes through a web-based portal. Currently, we are developing genomic resources for 61 threatened species from a range of taxa, across Australia, with more than 130 collaborators from government, academia, and conservation organizations. Developed in direct consultation with government threatened-species managers and other conservation practitioners, herein we present our framework for meeting their needs and our systematic approach to integrating genomics into threatened species recovery.
Assuntos
Conservação dos Recursos Naturais/métodos , Espécies em Perigo de Extinção/legislação & jurisprudência , Genômica/normas , Animais , Coleta de Dados , Espécies em Perigo de Extinção/tendências , Genoma , Genômica/legislação & jurisprudência , Genômica/métodos , GovernoRESUMO
The Earth BioGenome Project (EBP) is an audacious endeavor to obtain whole-genome sequences of representatives from all eukaryotic species on Earth. In addition to the project's technical and organizational challenges, it also faces complicated ethical, legal, and social issues. This paper, from members of the EBP's Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues (ELSI) Committee, catalogs these ELSI concerns arising from EBP. These include legal issues, such as sample collection and permitting; the applicability of international treaties, such as the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Nagoya Protocol; intellectual property; sample accessioning; and biosecurity and ethical issues, such as sampling from the territories of Indigenous peoples and local communities, the protection of endangered species, and cross-border collections, among several others. We also comment on the intersection of digital sequence information and data rights. More broadly, this list of ethical, legal, and social issues for large-scale genomic sequencing projects may be useful in the consideration of ethical frameworks for future projects. While we do not-and cannot-provide simple, overarching solutions for all the issues raised here, we conclude our perspective by beginning to chart a path forward for EBP's work.
Assuntos
Espécies em Perigo de Extinção/legislação & jurisprudência , Ética em Pesquisa , Genômica , Animais , Biosseguridade/ética , Biosseguridade/legislação & jurisprudência , Genômica/ética , Genômica/legislação & jurisprudência , HumanosRESUMO
In the age of genomics, public understanding of complex scientific knowledge is critical. To combat reductionistic views, it is necessary to generate and organize educational material and data that keep pace with advances in genomics. The view that CCR5 is solely the receptor for HIV gave rise to demand to remove the gene in patients to create host HIV resistance, underestimating the broader roles and complex genetic inheritance of CCR5. A program aimed at providing research projects to undergraduates, known as CODE, has been expanded to build educational material for genes such as CCR5 in a rapid approach, exposing students and trainees to large bioinformatics databases and previous experiments for broader data to challenge commitment to biological reductionism. Our students organize expression databases, query environmental responses, assess genetic factors, generate protein models/dynamics, and profile evolutionary insights into a protein such as CCR5. The knowledgebase generated in the initiative opens the door for public educational information and tools (molecular videos, 3D printed models, and handouts), classroom materials, and strategy for future genetic ideas that can be distributed in formal, semiformal, and informal educational environments. This work highlights that many factors are missing from the reductionist view of CCR5, including the role of missense variants or expression of CCR5 with neurological phenotypes and the role of CCR5 and the delta32 variant in complex critical care patients with sepsis. When connected to genomic stories in the news, these tools offer critically needed Ethical, Legal, and Social Implication (ELSI) education to combat biological reductionism.
Assuntos
Genômica/ética , Infecções por HIV/prevenção & controle , HIV-1/patogenicidade , Receptores CCR5/genética , Internalização do Vírus , Bases de Dados Genéticas , Resistência à Doença/genética , Evolução Molecular , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Genômica/educação , Genômica/legislação & jurisprudência , Genômica/métodos , Infecções por HIV/genética , Infecções por HIV/virologia , HIV-1/metabolismo , Humanos , Disseminação de Informação/ética , Disseminação de Informação/legislação & jurisprudência , Mutação de Sentido Incorreto , Receptores CCR5/metabolismoRESUMO
The Global Alliance for Genomics and Health has approved a policy for the return of clinically actionable genomic research results, the first such policy approved by an international body. The policy acknowledges the potential medical benefits to millions of individuals who are participating in genomics research. It ties the pace of implementation to each country's clinical standards, including for the return of secondary findings, and urges funders to set aside resources to support responsible return.
Assuntos
Genômica/legislação & jurisprudência , Políticas , Pesquisa/legislação & jurisprudência , Pesquisa Biomédica/legislação & jurisprudência , Pesquisa Biomédica/métodos , Estudos de Associação Genética , Genômica/métodos , Humanos , InternacionalidadeRESUMO
Exome sequencing (ES) enhanced the diagnostic yield of genetic testing, but has also increased the possibility of uncertain findings. Prenatal ES is increasingly being offered after a fetal abnormality is detected through ultrasound. It is important to know how to handle uncertainty in this particularly stressful period. This systematic review aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of guidelines available for addressing uncertainty related to prenatal chromosomal microarray (CMA) and ES. Ten uncertainty types associated with prenatal ES and CMA were identified and defined by an international multidisciplinary team. Medline (all) and Embase were systematically searched. Laboratory scientists, clinical geneticists, psychologists, and a fetal medicine specialist screened the papers and performed the data extraction. Nineteen papers were included. Recommendations generally emphasized the importance of trio analysis, clinical information, data sharing, validation and re-analysis, protocols, multidisciplinary teams, genetic counselling, whether to limit the possible scope of results, and when to report particular findings. This systematic review helps provide a vocabulary for uncertainties, and a compass to navigate uncertainties. Prenatal CMA and ES guidelines provide a strong starting point for determining how to handle uncertainty. Gaps in guidelines and recommendations were identified and discussed to provide direction for future research and policy making.
Assuntos
Estudos de Associação Genética , Predisposição Genética para Doença , Genômica , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Gerenciamento Clínico , Feminino , Estudos de Associação Genética/métodos , Genômica/legislação & jurisprudência , Genômica/métodos , Política de Saúde , Humanos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Gravidez , Diagnóstico Pré-Natal/métodos , IncertezaRESUMO
ELSI (Ethical, Legal, and Social Issues) is a widely used acronym in the bioethics literature that encompasses a broad range of research examining the various impacts of science and technology on society. In Canada, GE3LS (Genetics, Ethical, Economic, Environmental, Legal, Social issues) is the term used to describe ELSI studies in the context of genetics and genomics research. It is intentionally more expansive in that GE3LS explicitly brings economic and environmental issues under its purview. ELSI/GE3LS research is increasingly relevant in recent years as there has been a greater emphasis on "translational research" that moves genomic discoveries from the bench to the clinic. The purpose of this chapter is to outline a range of ELSI-related work that might be conducted as part of a large scale genetics or genomics research project, and to provide some practical insights on how a scientific research team might incorporate a strong and effective ELSI program within its broader research mandate. We begin by describing the historical context of ELSI research and the development of GE3LS research in the Canadian context. We then illustrate how some ELSI research might unfold by outlining a variety of GE3LS research questions or content domains and the methodologies that might be employed in studying them. We conclude with some practical suggestions about how to build an effective ELSI/GE3LS team and focus within a broader scientific research program.
Assuntos
Pesquisa em Genética/ética , Genômica/ética , Genômica/legislação & jurisprudência , Canadá , Ética em Pesquisa , Pesquisa em Genética/legislação & jurisprudência , Genoma Humano , Humanos , Política Pública , Publicações/ética , Publicações/legislação & jurisprudência , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica/ética , Pesquisa Translacional Biomédica/legislação & jurisprudênciaRESUMO
Genome rearrangements are mutations affecting large portions of a genome, and a reversal is one of the most studied genome rearrangements in the literature through the Sorting by Reversals (SbR) problem. SbR is solvable in polynomial time on signed permutations (i.e., the gene orientation is known), and it is NP-hard on unsigned permutations. This problem (and many others considering genome rearrangements) models genome as a list of its genes in the order they appear, ignoring all other information present in the genome. Recent works claimed that the incorporation of the size of intergenic regions, i.e., sequences of nucleotides between genes, may result in better estimators for the real distance between genomes. Here we introduce the Sorting Signed Permutations by Intergenic Reversals problem, that sorts a signed permutation using reversals both on gene order and intergenic sizes. We show that this problem is NP-hard by a reduction from the 3-partition problem. Then, we propose a 2-approximation algorithm for it. Finally, we also incorporate intergenic indels (i.e., insertions or deletions of intergenic regions) to overcome a limitation of sorting by conservative events (such as reversals) and propose two approximation algorithms.
Assuntos
DNA Intergênico/genética , Rearranjo Gênico/genética , Genômica/legislação & jurisprudência , Algoritmos , Mutação INDEL/genética , Modelos Genéticos , Mutação/genéticaRESUMO
Genetic research often utilizes or generates information that is potentially sensitive to individuals, families, or communities. For these reasons, genetic research may warrant additional scrutiny from investigators and governmental regulators, compared to other types of biomedical research. The informed consent process should address the range of social and psychological issues that may arise in genetic research. This article addresses a number of these issues, including recruitment of participants, disclosure of results, psychological impact of results, insurance and employment discrimination, community engagement, consent for tissue banking, and intellectual property issues. Points of consideration are offered to assist in the development of protocols and consent processes in light of contemporary debates on a number of these issues. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Assuntos
Pesquisa em Genética/legislação & jurisprudência , Genoma Humano/genética , Genômica/legislação & jurisprudência , Consentimento Livre e Esclarecido , Revelação/legislação & jurisprudência , Genômica/métodos , Humanos , Propriedade Intelectual , Fatores de Risco , Sequenciamento do Exoma/métodos , Sequenciamento do Exoma/estatística & dados numéricos , Sequenciamento Completo do Genoma/métodos , Sequenciamento Completo do Genoma/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
The analogy between genomics and imaging has been an important touchstone in the debate on how secondary findings should be handled in both clinical and research genomics contexts. However, a critical eye is needed to understand whether an analogy like this one provides an adequate basis for policymaking in genomics. Genomics and imaging are undoubtedly similar in certain ways, but whether that similarity is adequate to justify adopting identical policies is a task that requires further analysis. This is highlighted by the fact that secondary findings are produced in other domains of medicine and public health, such as newborn screening programs, routine laboratory panels, and antibiotic sensitivity testing, and that the practices for handling secondary findings in each of these areas are different. These examples demonstrate that medicine has no single comprehensive policy or set of practices for managing secondary findings. Analogies to imaging, newborn screening, routine testing panels, and antibiotic sensitivity testing all lead to different policy options for genomics. In this piece we argue that analogies are a powerful way of driving policy discussions by rendering two different areas of medical practice similar, but an overdependence on a single analogy risks limiting policy discussions in potentially deleterious ways.
Assuntos
Revelação/ética , Testes Genéticos/ética , Genômica/ética , Política de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Formulação de Políticas , Saúde Pública/ética , Diagnóstico por Imagem/ética , Revelação/legislação & jurisprudência , Testes Genéticos/legislação & jurisprudência , Genômica/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Achados Incidentais , Recém-Nascido , Análise de Sequência de DNARESUMO
Data sharing is a valuable aspect of science and required by most funding bodies and journals. However, the national regulatory guidelines of many African nations do not explicitly allow for broad genetic data sharing. Given these restrictions, there is a need to reconsider these policies and propose creative solutions.
Assuntos
Pesquisa em Genética/legislação & jurisprudência , Genômica/normas , Disseminação de Informação/legislação & jurisprudência , África , Genômica/legislação & jurisprudência , Humanos , Disseminação de Informação/métodosRESUMO
This study adopts a heuristic technique to argue the thesis that a set of norms rooted in the African philosophy of Ubuntu can usefully supplement current research guidelines for dealing with incidental findings discovered in genomic research. The consensus regarding incidental findings is that there is an ethical obligation to return individual genetic incidental findings that meet the threshold of analytic and clinical validity, have clinical utility, and are actionable, provided that research contributors have not opted out from receiving such information. This study outlines the hurdles that may hinder the integration of this consensus in mainstream clinical practice, and shows how an ethical theory from the global south may be used to address the same. This will advance the field of ethical, legal and social issues of personalized medicine by providing exposure to the under-represented African perspective on the ethical, legal, and social issues of genomics.