The burden of illness in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria receiving treatment with the C5-inhibitors eculizumab or ravulizumab: results from a US patient survey.

Paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) is a rare and life-threatening disease with symptoms of hemolysis and thrombosis. Current therapies for this complement-mediated disease rely predominantly on inhibition of the C5 complement protein. However, data on treatment responses and quality of life in C5-inhibitor (C5i)-treated PNH patients are scarce. The objective of this study was to determine C5i treatment effects on clinical parameters, PNH symptoms, quality of life, and resource use for PNH patients. This cross-sectional study surveyed 122 individuals in the USA receiving treatment for PNH with C5-targeted monoclonal antibodies, eculizumab (ECU) or ravulizumab (RAV). Despite most patients receiving C5i therapy for ≥ 3 months (ECU 100%, n = 35; RAV 95.4%, n = 83), many patients remained anemic with hemoglobin levels ≤ 12 g/dL in 87.5% (n = 28/32) and 82.9% (n = 68/82) of ECU and RAV recipients, respectively. A majority of patients on ECU (88.6%; n = 31/35) and RAV (74.7%; n = 65/87) reported fatigue symptoms. Among PNH patients receiving C5i therapy for ≥ 12 months, some still reported thrombotic events (ECU, 10.0%, n = 1/10; RAV, 23.5%, n = 4/17) and required transfusions within the past year (ECU, 52.2%, n = 12/23; RAV, 22.6%, n = 7/31). Other patient-reported PNH symptoms included breakthrough hemolysis, shortness of breath, and headaches. Patients reported scores below the average population norms on the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue and European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) scales. Overall, this study found that PNH patients receiving ECU or RAV therapy demonstrated a significant burden of illness, highlighting the need for improved PNH therapies.

Cost burden of breakthrough hemolysis in patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria receiving ravulizumab versus eculizumab.

Objectives: Although complement inhibition is highly effective, patients with paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria (PNH) may experience intravascular breakthrough hemolysis (BTH). Underlying causes may include elevated free C5, pregnancy, or non-pregnancy complement-activating conditions (e.g. infections). This study compared BTH-related resource utilization and costs in PNH patients treated with eculizumab versus ravulizumab. Methods: A cost model was developed using data from a targeted literature review and a survey of experienced clinicians. Costs associated with BTH episodes were calculated by cause and weighted by the proportion attributed to each cause and the cost of treating each episode. The model captured direct medical costs in 2018 US dollars. Annual BTH-related healthcare resource utilization was also calculated. Results: BTH episodes in the literature were commonly associated with elevated lactate dehydrogenase and aspartate aminotransferase, hemoglobinuria, transfusion needs, and/or recurrence of PNH symptoms. The majority of BTH management costs in eculizumab-treated patients related to changing from the approved dosing regimen following an episode of BTH, rather than acute management. No ongoing dosing changes were expected for ravulizumab-treated patients following episodes of BTH, substantially reducing its ongoing management costs. Resource utilization was greater for eculizumab-treated patients than ravulizumab-treated patients due to higher incidence of BTH, and risk of elevated free C5-related BTH. Total incremental cost was substantially lower for ravulizumab- vs eculizumab-treated patients ($407 vs $9379); results were consistent when pregnant women were not included ($386 vs $3472). Conclusion: Overall resource use and costs for BTH are estimated to be lower for PNH patients receiving ravulizumab compared with eculizumab.

Prevalence and impact of financial hardship among New England pediatric stem cell transplantation families.

Poverty is correlated with negative health outcomes in pediatric primary care and subspecialties; its association with childhood hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) patterns of care and clinical outcomes is not known. We describe family-reported financial hardship at a primary referral center in New England and explore the relationship between measures of poverty and patterns of care and clinical outcomes. Forty-five English-speaking parents of children after allogeneic HSCT in the prior 12 months completed a 1-time survey (response rate 88%). Low-income families, defined as ≤200% federal poverty level (FPL), were compared with all others. Eighteen (40%) families reported pre-HSCT incomes ≤200% FPL. Material hardship, including food, housing, or energy insecurity was reported by 17 (38%) families in the cohort. Low-income families reported disproportionate transplantation-related income losses, with 7 (39%) reporting annual income losses of >40% compared with 2 (18%) wealthier families (P = .02). In univariate analyses, 11 (61%) low-income children experienced graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) of any grade in the first 180 days after HSCT compared with 2 (7%) wealthier children (P = .004). We conclude that low income and, in particular, material hardship, are prevalent in a New England pediatric HSCT population and represent targets for improvement in quality of life. The role of poverty in mediating GVHD deserves further investigation in larger studies that can control for known risk factors and may provide a targetable source of transplantation-associated morbidity.