Predicting intracranial bleeding during anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism within different time frames: Findings from the RIETE registry.

BACKGROUND: The risk of intracranial bleeding during anticoagulation for venous thromboembolism (VTE) is substantial and persists beyond the initial treatment phase. We aimed to refine risk-assessment through phase-specific prognostic scores. METHODS: We identified data from 77,786 VTE patients in the RIETE registry from March 2009 to October 2023 to develop two prognostic scores for intracranial bleeding. Multivariable Cox regression was used to analyze distinct variables for the early (≤90 days) and late (>90 days) phases, with comparative validation against existing scores (modified ACCP, RIETE, VTE-BLEED, and CHAP). RESULTS: Intracranial bleeding occurred in 411 patients (0.53 %), with 208 cases in the early phase and 203 in the late phase. The 30-day mortality was 45 % and 35 %, respectively. Shared significant predictors for both phases include baseline abnormal mental status, brain cancer, recent intracranial bleeding, and epilepsy. Unique to early-phase bleeding were body weight, non-brain cancer, hypertension, dementia, thrombocytopenia, renal insufficiency, and thrombolytic therapy. Advanced age, pulmonary embolism initially, prior stroke, depression, treatment with direct oral anticoagulants, and use of corticosteroids predicted late-phase bleeding. Both prognostic scores showed a c-statistic of 0.68, outperforming existing scores. CONCLUSIONS: The study introduces two temporal prognostic scores for intracranial bleeding during anticoagulation for VTE. By discerning specific risk factors pertinent to each treatment phase, these scores outperform traditional models, offering an advanced tool for clinical decision-making. They hold significant potential for optimizing anticoagulation management and reducing bleeding-related mortality.

Thrombolysis After Dabigatran Reversal for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A National Registry-Based Study and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Limited data exist on the safety of IV thrombolysis (IVT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab. We sought to evaluate the safety and efficacy of idarucizumab pretreatment in patients with AIS receiving IVT. METHODS: A national registry-based study evaluated the safety and efficacy of IVT in this specific subgroup. We also conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies and case series, aiming to document the pooled rates of (1) symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH), (2) any intracranial hemorrhage, (3) 3-month mortality, and (4) the proportion of excellent (modified Rankin Scale [mRS] scores 0-1) and (5) good (mRS scores 0-2) functional outcome at 3 months among patients with AIS, who received IVT after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab. Moreover, we sought to compare these outcomes between IVT-treated patients after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab and IVT-treated patients without dabigatran pretreatment. RESULTS: Thirteen cohorts including our nation-wide registry-based cohort and 1 case series comprising 553 patients with AIS (mean age: 75 years; male sex: 65%; median baseline NIH Stroke Scale score: 11 points) receiving idarucizumab before IVT were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled rate of sICH after IVT after idarucizumab administration was 4% (95% CI 1-9; I2 = 26%), while the pooled rates of any intracranial hemorrhage and 3-month mortality were 10% (95% CI 5-16; I2 = 24%) and 18% (95% CI 10-27; I2 = 0%), respectively. The pooled rates of excellent and good functional outcomes at 3 months were 56% (95% CI 27-83; I2 = 69%) and 70% (95% CI 57-81; I2 = 40%), respectively. The risk of sICH (risk ratio [RR] 1.86; 95% CI 0.91-3.80; I2 = 0%), any intracranial hemorrhage (RR 1.76; 95% CI 0.99-3.11; I2 = 8%), and 3-month mortality (RR 1.50; 95% CI 0.91-2.48; I2 = 0%) did not differ between patients with AIS receiving IVT with and without idarucizumab. Moreover, idarucizumab administration was associated with higher likelihood of achieving a 3-month good functional outcome (RR 1.35; 95% CI 1.11-1.65; I2 = 27%). DISCUSSION: IVT for AIS after dabigatran reversal with idarucizumab seems to be safe and effective in observational studies with limited number of patients. Randomized-controlled clinical trials are warranted to provide robust evidence on the safety and efficacy of IVT in this specific AIS subgroup.

Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients With Cervical Artery Dissection: A Secondary Analysis of the STOP-CAD Study.

OBJECTIVES: Cervical artery dissection (CeAD) accounts for 25% of ischemic strokes in young adults. This study evaluated the benefits and harms of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in patients presenting with spontaneous CeAD and acute ischemic stroke symptoms. METHODS: This analysis used data from the retrospective STOP-CAD study and included patients with spontaneous CeAD who presented within 1 day of acute ischemic stroke symptoms. Patients were dichotomized into those who received IVT and those managed without IVT. We assessed the association between IVT and 90-day functional independence (modified Rankin Scale scores 0-2) and the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH, defined as ICH causing new or worsening neurologic symptoms within 72 hours after CeAD diagnosis). RESULTS: This study included 1,653 patients from the original STOP-CAD cohort of 4,023. The median age was 49 years, and 35.1% were women; 512 (31.0%) received IVT. IVT was associated with 90-day functional independence (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.67, 95% CI 1.23-2.28, p = 0.001), but not with symptomatic ICH (aOR = 1.52, 95% CI 0.79-2.92, p = 0.215). DISCUSSION: In patients with spontaneous CeAD and suspected ischemic stroke, IVT improved functional outcomes, without increasing symptomatic ICH risk. These findings support current guideline recommendations to consider thrombolysis for otherwise eligible patients with CeAD. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that IVT significantly increases the probability of 90-day functional independence in patients with CeAD.

[A case of secondary immune thrombocytopenia induced by atezolizumab plus bevacizumab therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma resulting in death from intracranial hemorrhage].

An 84-year-old woman underwent laparoscopic partial hepatectomy for a single 3.0-cm-diameter nodule of hepatocellular carcinoma at segment 5. Although the postoperative condition was uneventful, multiple recurrences were observed six months after hepatic resection. Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) was the second-line therapy. However, she was later diagnosed as TACE refractory due to residual tumor and presence of portal vein tumor thrombus. Third-line therapy was the combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab, which was discontinued after 22 courses due to disease progression. Two months after the conclusion of chemotherapy, sudden onset of purpura was observed around her eyes and on her lower legs. Laboratory tests revealed severe thrombocytopenia, and she was diagnosed with secondary immune thrombocytopenic purpura. Steroids and immunoglobulin therapy were then administered. Although the immature platelet fraction increased after treatment, the platelet count did not. The patient died of intracranial hemorrhage 10 days after initiation of steroid and immunoglobulin therapy.

Adjunctive Intravenous Argatroban or Eptifibatide for Ischemic Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous thrombolysis is a standard treatment of acute ischemic stroke. The efficacy and safety of combining intravenous thrombolysis with argatroban (an anticoagulant agent) or eptifibatide (an antiplatelet agent) are unclear. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, three-group, adaptive, single-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial at 57 sites in the United States. Patients with acute ischemic stroke who had received intravenous thrombolysis within 3 hours after symptom onset were assigned to receive intravenous argatroban, eptifibatide, or placebo within 75 minutes after the initiation of thrombolysis. The primary efficacy outcome, the utility-weighted 90-day modified Rankin scale score (range, 0 to 10, with higher scores reflecting better outcomes), was assessed by means of centralized adjudication. The primary safety outcome was symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage within 36 hours after randomization. RESULTS: A total of 514 patients were assigned to receive argatroban (59 patients), eptifibatide (227 patients), or placebo (228 patients). All the patients received intravenous thrombolysis (70% received alteplase, and 30% received tenecteplase), and 225 patients (44%) underwent endovascular thrombectomy. At 90 days, the mean (±SD) utility-weighted modified Rankin scale scores were 5.2±3.7 with argatroban, 6.3±3.2 with eptifibatide, and 6.8±3.0 with placebo. The posterior probability that argatroban was better than placebo was 0.002 (posterior mean difference in utility-weighted modified Rankin scale score, -1.51±0.51) and that eptifibatide was better than placebo was 0.041 (posterior mean difference, -0.50±0.29). The incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage was similar in the three groups (4% with argatroban, 3% with eptifibatide, and 2% with placebo). Mortality at 90 days was higher in the argatroban group (24%) and the eptifibatide group (12%) than in the placebo group (8%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with intravenous thrombolysis within 3 hours after symptom onset, adjunctive treatment with intravenous argatroban or eptifibatide did not reduce poststroke disability and was associated with increased mortality. (Funded by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke; MOST ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03735979.).

Assessing mortality and safety of IV thrombolysis in ischemic stroke patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs): A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is considered a standard reperfusion therapy for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients presenting within 4.5 hours of the last known well (LKW). Current guidelines contraindicate the use of IVT in patients within the window who are on Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs) and took their last dose within 48 hours of presentation, due to a risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). OBJECTIVE: To assess the safety of IVT as management of AIS in patients who take DOACs. METHODS: A thorough literature search of four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Medline, Google Scholar, Web of science and ScienceDirect) was done from inception until May 2023. Double-arm studies that reported outcomes of mortality, sICH, and mRS scores were selected. Results from these studies were presented as odds ratios (ORs) with 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) and were pooled using a random-effects model. RESULTS: Four eligible studies were included with a total of 238,425 stroke patients who underwent IVT (3330 in the DOAC arm and 235,217 in the placebo arm). The group with prior DOAC intake showed a significant decrease in sICH development and an increase in functional independence at 90 days compared to the control group. No significant association was seen between prior DOAC use and any serious alteplase-related complication within 36 hours, serious systemic or life-threatening hemorrhage within 36 hours, mortality within 3 months, or mRS score at 3 months. CONCLUSION: The pooled analysis suggests that IVT is a safe management option for acute ischemic stroke in patients with DOAC intake before symptom onset without an increased risk of serious adverse events.

Antiplatelet Reversal Is Not Associated With Decreased Progression of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Near-Isolated Traumatic Brain Injury: A Retrospective Clustered Analysis From Two Trauma Centers.

INTRODUCTION: Antiplatelet agents (AAs) may increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). It is unclear whether reversal of antiplatelet effects (REV = desmopressin acetate [DDAVP] + Platelets) decreases ICH progression. The goal of the study was to determine whether REV was associated with decreased progression of ICH on repeat brain computed tomography (CT) scan. METHODS: This is a clustered study (November 2019 to March 2022) at two regionally distinct trauma centers (TCs) with differing standards of practice in patients with ICH, one reversal with DDAVP + Platelets (REV+) and the other no reversal with DDAVP + Platelets (REV-). Using electronic and manual chart review, data were collected on inpatients aged ≥ 18 y on preinjury AAs with CT proven ICH (abbreviated injury scale head ≥ 2) and no other abbreviated injury scale > 2 injuries, who had at least one repeat CT scan within 120 h of admission. ICH progression on repeat brain CT scan, mortality, and resource utilization were compared via univariate analysis (α = 0.05). RESULTS: One hundred fourteen patients were enrolled: 72 REV+ at the first TC and 42 REV- at the second TC. REV+ group had fewer White patients and a lower proportion on preinjury aspirin but were otherwise similar. ICH progression rate was 24/72 (33.3%) for REV+ and 11/42 (26.2%) for REV- (P = 0.43). Isolated subarachnoid hemorrhage was the most common lesion, followed by isolated subdural hemorrhage. No patients required cranial surgery. All-cause mortality (expired + hospice) was 5/72 (6.9%) and 1/42 (2.4%), respectively (P = 0.29). CONCLUSIONS: In this study of patients on preinjury AAs, REV was not associated with decreased ICH progression, lower mortality, or less resource utilization. These findings should be confirmed in a larger, prospective study.

Early recanalization after tenecteplase versus alteplase: Experience in a large stroke network.

INTRODUCTION: Previously published data are conflicting regarding the ability of tenecteplase versus alteplase to produce early recanalization of an intracranial large vessel occlusion. We compared the performance of each thrombolytic in a stroke network. METHODS: We queried our prospectively collected code stroke registry for basilar, internal carotid, or proximal middle cerebral artery occlusion patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis from 11/17/2021-9/16/2023. The primary outcome was early recanalization, defined using angiographic or clinical criteria. Secondary and safety outcomes included 90-day functional independence and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. A multivariable regression analysis was performed to determine independent associations with the primary outcome. RESULTS: 233 patients, with mean age 66.9 (16.6) years and median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score 15 (10-21), were included. One-hundred twenty-four of 233 (53.2 %) patients were treated with alteplase while 109/233 (46.8 %) were treated with tenecteplase. Endovascular thrombectomy was performed in 82 % of subjects. Early recanalization rates were similar between the groups (alteplase 22.6 %, tenecteplase 14.7 %; p = 0.14), as were rates of 90-day independent neurological function, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, and mortality. Patients with an internal carotid artery occlusion or with higher presenting stroke severity were less likely to achieve early recanalization. CONCLUSIONS: Tenecteplase and alteplase have similar rates of early recanalization, 90-day functional independence, and safety outcomes in large vessel occlusion patients. Occlusion site and stroke severity predict response to thrombolysis. Future studies may investigate other factors associated with a positive response to thrombolytics as expanded treatment indications are explored.

Racial and ethnic differences in restarting antiplatelet therapy in patients with primary intracranial hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There has long been clinical disagreement over the resumption of antiplatelet therapy in patients with primary intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). This meta-analysis aimed to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of restarting antiplatelet therapy after ICH among different races and ethnicities. METHODS: All relevant medical studies involving adults with antiplatelet-associated ICH published in PubMed, The Cochrane Library and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure from inception to March 2024 were sourced. Outcome measures were thromboembolic events (stroke and myocardial infarction) and recurrence of ICH. After assessing study heterogeneity and publication bias, we performed a meta-analysis using random-effects model to assess the strength of association between resumption of antiplatelet therapy and our outcomes.The review was not registered and the review protocol was not prepared. RESULTS: Thirty-five studies were included, with 9758 ICH patients. Subgroup analysis revealed that restarting antiplatelet therapy was associated with a significantly higher risk of recurrence or aggravation of cerebral hemorrhage in Asians[OR = 1.48, 95% CI (1.13-1.94), P = 0.004]; in Caucasians, on the contrary, reinitiation of antiplatelet therapy was not associated with a significantly higher risk of recurrence or aggravation of cerebral hemorrhage [OR = 0.85, 95% CI (0.67-1.06), P = 0.149]. Reinitiation of antiplatelet therapy was associated with a significantly lower risk of cerebral infarction [OR = 0.61, 95% CI (0.39-0.96), P = 0.033]. Restarting antiplatelet therapy after cerebral hemorrhage was not associated with a higher incidence rate of mortality [OR = 0.79, 95% CI (0.57, 1.08), P = 0.138], myocardial infarction [OR = 2.40, 95%CI (0.53,10.79), P = 0.253], hemiparesis [OR = 0.38, 95%CI (0.03,4.81), P = 0.451], neurological deficit [OR = 0.86,95%CI(0.32,2.33),P = 0.766]. CONCLUSION: Reinstitution of antiplatelet therapy after ICH was associated with a lower risk of thromboembolic complications.Resumption of antiplatelet therapy was not associated with a higher incidence of cerebral hemorrhage in Caucasians, but may be associated with a higher risk of cerebral hemorrhage recurrence in Asian populations.

Optimizing outcomes: A retrospective analysis of discharge safety for elderly mTBI patients on anticoagulation therapy.

BACKGROUND: Mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBIs) pose a significant risk, particularly in the elderly population on anticoagulation therapy. The safety of discharging these patients from the emergency department (ED) with a negative initial computed tomography (CT) scan has been debated due to the risk of delayed intracranial hemorrhage (d-ICH). OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes, including d-ICH, between elderly patients on anticoagulation therapy presenting with mTBI who were admitted versus discharged from the ED after an initial negative head CT scan. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study at the Chaim Sheba Medical Center, assessing outcomes of 1598 elderly patients on anticoagulation therapy who presented with mTBI and an initial negative head CT scan. Patients were either admitted for 24-h observation (Group A, n = 829) or discharged immediately from the ED (Group B, n = 769). The primary outcome was incidence of d-ICH within 14 days. RESULTS: Among the 1598 patients included in the study, 46 admitted patients and 1 discharged patient returned within 14 days for repeat CT, identifying one asymptomatic hemorrhage in the discharged patient. Mortality at 30 days was significantly higher in admitted patients compared to discharged patients (4.8% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.001), though cause of death was unrelated to head injury in both groups. CONCLUSION: In elderly patients on anticoagulation with mTBI and a negative initial CT, admission was associated with a higher risk of d-ICH compared to discharge. These findings have implications for clinical decision-making in this high-risk population.

Development and Validation of a Predictive Model for Intracranial Haemorrhage in Patients on Direct Oral Anticoagulants.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) poses a significant threat to patients on Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs), with existing risk scores inadequately predicting ICH risk in these patients. We aim to develop and validate a predictive model for ICH risk in DOAC-treated patients. METHODS: 24,794 patients treated with a DOAC were identified in a province-wide electronic medical and health data platform in Tianjin, China. The cohort was randomly split into a 4:1 ratio for model development and validation. We utilized forward stepwise selection, Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) to select predictors. Model performance was compared using the area under the curve (AUC) and net reclassification index (NRI). The optimal model was stratified and compared with the DOAC model. RESULTS: The median age is 68.0 years, and 50.4% of participants are male. The XGBoost model, incorporating six independent factors (history of hemorrhagic stroke, peripheral artery disease, venous thromboembolism, hypertension, age, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels), demonstrated superior performance in the development dateset. It showed moderate discrimination (AUC: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.64-0.73), outperforming existing DOAC scores (ΔAUC = 0.063, P = 0.003; NRI = 0.374, P < 0.001). Risk categories significantly stratified ICH risk (low risk: 0.26%, moderate risk: 0.74%, high risk: 5.51%). Finally, the model demonstrated consistent predictive performance in the internal validation. CONCLUSION: In a real-world Chinese population using DOAC therapy, this study presents a reliable predictive model for ICH risk. The XGBoost model, integrating six key risk factors, offers a valuable tool for individualized risk assessment in the context of oral anticoagulation therapy.

Timing of Anticoagulation Resumption and Risk of Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Complications in Patients With ICH and Mechanical Heart Valves.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In patients with mechanical heart valves and recent intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), clinicians need to balance the risk of thromboembolism during the period off anticoagulation and the risk of hematoma expansion on anticoagulation. The optimal timing of anticoagulation resumption is unknown. We aimed to investigate the relationship between reversal therapy and ischemic stroke, between duration off anticoagulation and risk of ischemic strokes or systemic embolism and between timing of anticoagulation resumption and risk of rebleeding and ICH expansion. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort observational study in 3 tertiary hospitals. Consecutive adult patients with mechanical heart valves admitted for ICH between January 1, 2000, and July 13, 2022, were included. The primary end points of our study were thromboembolic events (cerebral, retinal, or systemic) while off anticoagulation and ICH expansion after anticoagulation resumption (defined by the following criteria: increase by one-third in intracerebral hematoma volume, increase by one-third in convexity subdural hemorrhage diameter, or visually unequivocal expansion of other ICH locations to the naked eye). RESULTS: A total of 171 patients with mechanical heart valves who experienced ICH were included in the final analysis. Most of the patients (79.5%) received reversal therapy for anticoagulation. Patients who received anticoagulation reversal therapy did not have increased risk of thromboembolic complications. Time off anticoagulation was not associated with risk of ischemic stroke; only 2 patients had a stroke within 7 days of the ICH, and both had additional major risk factors of thromboembolism. The rate of ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack while off anticoagulation was lower than the rate of ICH expansion once anticoagulation was resumed (6.4% vs 9.9%). Furthermore, patients who developed ICH expansion had higher mortality compared with patients who had ischemic stroke while being off anticoagulation (41% vs 9%). Use of intravenous heparin bridging upon resumption of warfarin was strongly associated with increased risk of ICH expansion as compared with restarting warfarin without a heparin bridge. DISCUSSION: Withholding anticoagulation for at least 7 days after ICH may be safe in patients with mechanical heart valves. Heparin bridging during anticoagulation resumption may be associated with increased risk of bleeding.

Postoperative Acute Intracranial Hemorrhage and Venous Thromboembolism in Patients with Brain Metastases Receiving Acetylsalicylic Acid Perioperatively.

Cranial operations are associated with a high risk of postoperative intracranial hemorrhage (pICH) and venous thromboembolic events, along with increased mortality and morbidity. With the use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) for prophylaxis becoming more prevalent, the risk of bleeding when ASA is administered preoperatively is unknown, as are the effects of discontinuation upon the occurrence of thromboembolic events, especially in societies with aging demographics. To address these questions, a retrospective analysis was performed using medical records and radiological images of 1862 patients subjected to brain tumor surgery over a decade in our department. The risk of pICH was compared in patients with metastases receiving ASA treatment versus patients not receiving ASA treatment. The occurrence of venous thromboembolic events after surgery was also evaluated. The study group consisted of 365 patients with different types of brain metastases. In total, 20 patients suffered pICH and 7 of these were associated with clinical neurological deterioration postoperatively. Of the 58 patients who took ASA preoperatively, 2 patients experienced pICH, compared with 5 patients in the non-ASA impact group (p = 0.120). Patients who took ASA were not at significantly higher risk of pICH and therefore a worse outcome compared to the group without ASA. Therefore, these data suggest that in patients at high cardiovascular risk, ASA can be safely continued during elective brain tumor surgery.

Early dual antiplatelet therapy in patients with minor ischemic stroke after intravenous thrombolysis.

OBJECTIVES: Minor stroke is defined by a score of 5 or less on the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS). Prior trials have shown efficacy of short term dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) in secondary prevention of stroke among patients with transient ischemic attack (TIA) or minor ischemic stroke, but no randomized clinical trials have studied this benefit after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT). Our aim was to investigate the safety of DAPT within 90 days after IVT in patients with acute minor ischemic stroke. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed medical records of patients older than 18 years that received IVT between January 2015 and December 2022. Patients had a diagnosis of acute minor stroke or averted stroke (complete recovery and negative image on follow-up). Single or dual antiplatelet treatment was started 24 hours after thrombolysis according to the physician's judgment. Patients were divided in two groups: single and dual antiplatelet therapy. We assessed clinical outcome using the modified Rankin scale (mRS), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) and mortality at 90 days. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients met the inclusion criteria, 68% men aged 64±16,5 years. Seventy five percent had an ischemic stroke and 25% had an averted stroke. Median door-to-needle time was 50 minutes. Fifty one percent were in the single antiplatelet group and 49% in the dual antiplatelet therapy group. There were no differences in demographic and clinical characteristics between groups. The 90-day mRS did not show significant difference between groups. No patients had SICH nor died during follow-up. One patient in the single antiplatelet group had stroke recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Dual antiplatelet therapy after IVT with rtPA for acute minor ischemic stroke appears not to increase the risk of bleeding and mortality compared to single antiplatelet therapy in the first three months after the event. This is the first study to assess this subject in a Latin American population.

Intensive Versus Moderate Statin-Based Therapies in Patients With Mild Ischemic Stroke: A Prospective Multicenter Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Statins are widely used for treating patients with ischemic stroke at risk of secondary cerebrovascular events. It is unknown whether Asian populations benefit from more intensive statin-based therapy for stroke recurrence. Therefore, in the present study we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of high-dose and moderate-dose statins for patients who had experienced mild ischemic stroke during the acute period. METHODS AND RESULTS: This multicenter prospective study included patients with mild ischemic stroke who presented within 72 hours of symptom onset. The outcomes of patients in the high-intensity and moderate-intensity statin treatment groups were compared, with the main efficacy outcome being stroke recurrence and the primary safety end point being intracranial hemorrhage. The propensity score matching method was employed to control for imbalances in baseline variables. Subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate group differences. In total, the data of 2950 patients were analyzed at 3 months, and the data of 2764 patients were analyzed at 12 months due to loss to follow-up. According to the multivariable Cox analyses adjusted for potential confounders, stroke recurrence occurred similarly in the high-intensity statin and moderate-intensity statin groups (3 months: adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 1.12 [95% CI, 0.85-1.49]; P=0.424; 12 months: adjusted HR, 1.08 [95% CI, 0.86-1.34]; P=0.519). High-intensity statin therapy was associated with an increased risk of intracranial hemorrhage (3 months: adjusted HR, 1.81 [95% CI, 1.00-3.25]; P=0.048; 12 months: adjusted HR, 1.86 [95% CI, 1.10-3.16]; P=0.021). The results from the propensity score-matched analyses were consistent with those from the Cox proportional hazards analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with moderate-intensity statin therapy, high-dose statin therapy may not decrease the risk of mild, noncardiogenic ischemic stroke recurrence but may increase the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. REGISTRATION: URL: www.chictr.org.cn/. Unique Identifier: ChiCTR1900025214.

Safety and efficacy of tirofiban combined with intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular treatment in acute large vessel occlusion stroke.

OBJECTIVE: This study assesses the safety and efficacy of tirofiban for patients with large vessel occlusion stroke after intravenous thrombolysis. METHODS: This study data was from SUSTAIN, DEVT, and RESCUE BT trials. According to whether the use of tirofiban who underwent endovascular treatment and preceding intravenous thrombolysis was divided into the tirofiban group and the no-tirofiban group. The safety outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, any intracranial hemorrhage within 48 h, and 3-month mortality. The efficacy outcome was defined as a score of 0-2 on the modified Rankin Scale scores at 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 372 patients with intravenous thrombolysis were included in these SUSTAIN, DEVT, and RESCUE BT trials. Adjusted multivariate analysis showed that tirofiban with intravenous thrombolysis was not associated with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (aOR, 0.87; 95 % CI, 0.49-1.57; P=0.65), any intracranial hemorrhage within 48 h (aOR, 1.00; 95 % CI, 0.60-1.66; P=1.00), 3-month mortality (aOR, 1.10; 95 % CI, 0.56-2.19; P=0.78) and 3-month modified Rankin Scale scores 0-2 (aOR, 0.72; 95 % CI, 0.42-1.25; P=0.25) in patients with acute large vessel occlusion. In the subgroup analysis, we found that tirofiban was not recommended for females (aOR, 0.34; 95 % CI, 0.12-0.93), baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score≤9 (aOR, 0.37; 95 % CI, 0.18-0.76), and cardiogenic embolism (aOR, 0.36; 95 % CI, 0.14-0.97). CONCLUSION: Tirofiban combined with intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute large vessel occlusion may be safe. Further studies need to confirm the effectiveness of tirofiban after intravenous thrombolysis in different stroke etiology.

Advances in the medical treatment and diagnosis of intracranial hemorrhage associated with oral anticoagulation.

INTRODUCTION: With the increasing prevalence of atrial fibrillation (AF), it entails expanding oral anticoagulants (OACs) use, carrying a higher risk of associated hemorrhagic events, including intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Despite advances in OACs development with a better safety profile and reversal agent for these anticoagulants, there is still no consensus on the optimal management of patients with OACs-associated ICH. AREAS COVERED: In this review, the authors have carried out an exhaustive search on the advances in recent years. The authors provide an update on the management of ICH in anticoagulated patients, as well as an update on the latest evidence on anticoagulation resumption, recent therapeutic strategies, and investigational drugs that could play a role in the future. EXPERT OPINION: Following an ICH event in an anticoagulated patient, a comprehensive clinical evaluation is imperative. Anticoagulation should be promptly withdrawn and reversed. Once the patient is stabilized, a reintroduction of anticoagulation should be considered, typically within a timeframe of 4-8 weeks, if feasible. If re-anticoagulation is not possible, alternative options such as Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion are available.

Functional Outcome and Hemorrhage Rates After Bridging Therapy With Tenecteplase or Alteplase in Patients With Large Ischemic Core.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: IV tenecteplase is an alternative to alteplase before mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in patients with large-vessel occlusion (LVO) ischemic stroke. Little data are available on its use in patients with large ischemic core. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of both thrombolytics in this population. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with anterior circulation LVO strokes and diffusion-weighed imaging Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (DWI-ASPECTS) ≤5 treated with tenecteplase or alteplase before MT from the TETRIS (tenecteplase) and ETIS (alteplase) French multicenter registries. Primary outcome was reduced disability at 3 months (ordinal analysis of the modified Rankin scale [mRS]). Safety outcomes were 3-month mortality, parenchymal hematoma (PH), and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). We used propensity score overlap weighting to reduce baseline differences between treatment groups. RESULTS: We analyzed 647 patients (tenecteplase: n = 194; alteplase: n = 453; inclusion period 2015-2022). Median (interquartile range) age was 71 (57-81) years, with NIH Stroke Scale score 19 (16-22), DWI-ASPECTS 4 (3-5), and last seen well-to-IV thrombolysis and puncture times 165 minutes (130-226) and 260 minutes (203-349), respectively. After MT, the successful reperfusion rate was 83.1%. After propensity score overlap weighting, all baseline variables were well balanced between both treatment groups. Compared with patients treated with alteplase, patients treated with tenecteplase had better 3-month mRS (common odds ratio [OR] for reduced disability: 1.37, 1.01-1.87, p = 0.046) and lower 3-month mortality (OR 0.52, 0.33-0.81, p < 0.01). There were no significant differences between thrombolytics for PH (OR 0.84, 0.55-1.30, p = 0.44) and sICH incidence (OR 0.70, 0.42-1.18, p = 0.18). DISCUSSION: Our data are encouraging regarding the efficacy and reassuring regarding the safety of tenecteplase compared with that of alteplase in bridging therapy for patients with LVO strokes and a large ischemic core in routine clinical care. These results support its consideration as an alternative to alteplase in bridging therapy for patients with large ischemic cores. TRIALS REGISTRATION INFORMATION: NCT03776877 (ETIS registry) and NCT05534360 (TETRIS registry). CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that patients with anterior circulation LVO stroke and DWI-ASPECTS ≤5 treated with tenecteplase vs alteplase before MT experienced better functional outcomes and lower mortality at 3 months.

Time-in-therapeutic-range defined warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: a Nationwide Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known how individual time-in-therapeutic-range (TTR) impacts the effectiveness and safety of warfarin therapy compared to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of standard dose DOACs to warfarin in patients with AF, while categorizing warfarin treated patients into quartiles based on their individual TTR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a nationwide study including all patients with new-onset AF between 2011 and 2018 in Finland. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using Cox regression analysis with the inverse probability of treatment weighted method to assess the risks of ischaemic stroke (IS), intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) and mortality for users of apixaban (n = 12,426), dabigatran (n = 4545), rivaroxaban (n = 12,950) and warfarin (n = 43,548). RESULTS: The median TTR for warfarin users was 72%. Compared to the second best TTR quartile (reference), the risk of IS was higher in the two poorest TTR quartiles, and lower in the best TTR quartile and on rivaroxaban [2.35 (95% confidence interval, 1.85-2.85), 1.44 (1.18-1.75), 0.60 (0.47-0.77) and 0.72 (0.56-0.92)]. These differences were non-significant for apixaban and dabigatran. HR of ICH was 6.38 (4.88-8.35) and 1.87 (1.41-2.49) in the two poorest TTR groups, 1.44 (1.02-1.93) on rivaroxaban, and 0.58 (0.40-0.85) in the best TTR group compared to the reference group. Mortality was higher in the two poorest TTR groups and lowest in the best TTR group. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome was unsatisfactory in the two lowest TTR quartiles - in half of the patients treated with warfarin. The differences between the high TTR groups and standard dose DOACs were absent or modest.