Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
Value Health ; 23(3): 309-318, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32197726

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite potentially severe and fatal outcomes, recent studies of solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients in Europe suggest that hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is underdiagnosed, with a prevalence of active infection of up to 4.4%. OBJECTIVES: To determine the cost-effectiveness of introducing routine screening for HEV infection in SOT recipients in the UK. METHODS: A Markov cohort model was developed to evaluate the cost-utility of 4 HEV screening options over the lifetime of 1000 SOT recipients. The current baseline of nonsystematic testing was compared with annual screening of all patients by polymerase chain reaction (PCR; strategy A) or HEV-antigen (HEV-Ag) detection (strategy B) and selective screening of patients who have a raised alanine aminotransferase (ALT) value by PCR (strategy C) or HEV-Ag (strategy D). The primary outcome was the incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). We adopted the National Health Service (NHS) perspective and discounted future costs and benefits at 3.5%. RESULTS: At a willingness-to-pay of £20 000/QALY gained, systematic screening of SOT patients by any method (strategy A-D) had a high probability (77.9%) of being cost-effective. Among screening strategies, strategy D is optimal and expected to be cost-saving to the NHS; if only PCR testing strategies are considered, then strategy C becomes cost-effective (£660/QALY). These findings were robust against a wide range of sensitivity and scenario analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Our model showed that routine screening for HEV in SOT patients is very likely to be cost-effective in the UK, particularly in patients presenting with an abnormal alanine aminotransferase.


Assuntos
Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hepatite E/diagnóstico , Hepatite E/economia , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Transplante de Órgãos/economia , Medicina Estatal/economia , Ensaios Enzimáticos Clínicos/economia , Redução de Custos , Análise Custo-Benefício , Hepatite E/mortalidade , Humanos , Cadeias de Markov , Modelos Econômicos , Transplante de Órgãos/efeitos adversos , Transplante de Órgãos/mortalidade , Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase/economia , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Prevalência , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Testes Sorológicos/economia , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino Unido/epidemiologia
2.
Vaccine ; 38(3): 673-679, 2020 01 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31668822

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the disease burden of hepatitis E virus (HEV)-infected inpatients in Jiangsu province, China. METHODS: Between July 1, 2016 and October 31, 2018, 1152 HEV-infected inpatients were identified from four cities in Jiangsu province, namely, Nanjing, Suzhou, Yancheng, and Zhenjiang. The disease burden comprised the economic burden and loss of health due to HEV infection. Factors influencing the disease burden were analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The average direct, indirect, and total economic burden for 1152 HEV-infected inpatients was US$ 4,986.40, US$ 1,507.28, and US$ 6,493.68, respectively, accounting for 46.66%, 14.11%, and 60.77% of per capita disposable income (PCDI) in Jiangsu province, respectively. The disease burden for HEV-infected inpatients with hepatitis B was significantly higher than that for other inpatients. The average EQ-5D utility value of 1152 HEV-infected inpatients was 0.72 ±â€¯0.18 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and the average EQ-visual analogue score (EQ-VAS) was 0.66 ±â€¯0.17 points. Multivariate analysis showed that the direct economic burden and the total economic burden were influenced by variables such as hospitalization days, outcomes, past history of other diseases, and regions (P < 0.05). It was estimated the direct economic burden, the indirect economic burden, and the total economic burden for all HEV-infected inpatients in Jiangsu province in 2018 was approximately US$ 9.2 million, US$ 2.8 million and US$ 12.0 million, respectively. CONCLUSION: The disease burden of HEV infection in Jiangsu province is severe, and more attention should be paid to the prevention of hepatitis E and the treatment of comorbidities.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Hepatite E/economia , Hepatite E/epidemiologia , Hospitalização/economia , Pacientes Internados , Adolescente , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hepatite E/psicologia , Vírus da Hepatite E , Humanos , Pacientes Internados/psicologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Adulto Jovem
3.
Vaccine ; 37(39): 5868-5876, 2019 09 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31443991

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Hepatitis E virus (HEV) infection is hyper-endemic in China, it is characterized with a high morbidity of fulminant hepatitis and mortality in pregnant women. The first hepatitis E vaccine, HEV 239, was licensed in China in 2011 which provides an effective preventive measure. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of vaccination with HEV 239 in women of childbearing age in China and whether HEV antibody screening should be considered before vaccination. METHODS: A decision tree-Markov model was constructed to simulate HEV infection in a closed female cohort with an average first-marriage age of 25 years and evaluate health and economic outcomes of two potential vaccination strategies, direct vaccination and combined screening and vaccination, from a societal perspective. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER, additional costs per disability-adjusted life-year (DALY) averted) was calculated for each vaccination strategy versus no vaccination and between two vaccination strategies. Univariate and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the model findings. RESULTS: ICERs of direct vaccination and combined screening and vaccination versus no vaccination were $4040 and $3114 per DALY averted, respectively, much lower than 1-time Chinese per-capita GDP ($8127). Direct vaccination would need additional $45,455 for each DALY averted compared with combined screening and vaccination, far more than the 3-time per-capita GDP. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses confirmed our findings that two vaccination strategies would be cost-effective if the willingness-to-pay reached the 1-time per-capita GDP, and that combined screening and vaccination would be more cost-effective than direct vaccination strategy. CONCLUSION: Vaccinating women of childbearing age with HEV 239 would cost less than the 1-time per-capita GDP for each DALY averted in China, and the vaccination with a prior screening would be the optimal option.


Assuntos
Vírus da Hepatite E/imunologia , Hepatite E/economia , Hepatite E/imunologia , Vacinação/economia , China , Análise Custo-Benefício/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida
5.
Transfusion ; 57(2): 258-266, 2017 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28144956

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The incidence of hepatitis E virus (HEV) has increased substantially in Europe recently, thereby threatening blood safety. A cost-effectiveness analysis for HEV screening of blood donations in the Netherlands was performed. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A simulation model was developed to mimic the process of donation, infections in the donor population, donation testing, and transmission to transfusion recipients. The variability of viral loads among donors was modeled using observed loads. The number of (incurable) chronic HEV infections among organ and stem cell transplant patients and the costs avoided by implementing blood screening were estimated. RESULTS: HEV screening of whole blood donations in pools of 24 would prevent 4.52 of the 4.94 transfusion-associated chronic HEV infections expected annually, at approximately €310,000 per prevented chronic case. Per case not curable by ribavirin prevention, costs are approximately 10 times higher. Selective screening, if logistically feasible, could reduce screening costs by 85%. Sensitivity analyses show that uncertainty in the HEV transmissibility and the frequency of HEV clearing greatly impact the estimated cost-effectiveness. Of all HEV infections nationwide one in 700 is estimated to be due to blood transfusion, while for chronic infections this is one in 3.5. CONCLUSION: Despite uncertainties in our estimates, preventing HEV transmission by screening of blood donations appears not excessively expensive compared to other blood-screening measures in the Netherlands. However, the impact on HEV disease burden may be relatively small as only a minority of all HEV cases is transmitted by blood transfusion.


Assuntos
Doadores de Sangue , Segurança do Sangue/economia , Seleção do Doador/economia , Hepatite E/economia , Modelos Econômicos , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Hepatite E/sangue , Hepatite E/transmissão , Humanos , Masculino , Países Baixos
6.
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi ; 38(2): 267-271, 2017 Feb 10.
Artigo em Chinês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28231679

RESUMO

Objective: To evaluate the cost-utility of different hepatitis E vaccination strategies in women aged 15 to 49. Methods: The Markov-decision tree model was constructed to evaluate the cost-utility of three hepatitis E virus vaccination strategies. Parameters of the models were estimated on the basis of published studies and experience of experts. Both methods on sensitivity and threshold analysis were used to evaluate the uncertainties of the model. Results: Compared with non-vaccination group, strategy on post-screening vaccination with rate as 100%, could save 0.10 quality-adjusted life years per capital in the women from the societal perspectives. After implementation of screening program and with the vaccination rate reaching 100%, the incremental cost utility ratio (ICUR) of vaccination appeared as 5 651.89 and 6 385.33 Yuan/QALY, respectively. Vaccination post to the implementation of a screening program, the result showed better benefit than the vaccination rate of 100%. Results from the sensitivity analysis showed that both the cost of hepatitis E vaccine and the inoculation compliance rate presented significant effects. If the cost were lower than 191.56 Yuan (RMB) or the inoculation compliance rate lower than 0.23, the vaccination rate of 100% strategy was better than the post-screening vaccination strategy, otherwise the post-screening vaccination strategy appeared the optimal strategy. Conclusion: Post-screening vaccination for women aged 15 to 49 from social perspectives seemed the optimal one but it had to depend on the change of vaccine cost and the rate of inoculation compliance.


Assuntos
Árvores de Decisões , Hepatite E/economia , Cadeias de Markov , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas contra Hepatite Viral/economia , Adolescente , Adulto , China/epidemiologia , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos e Análise de Custo , Feminino , Hepatite E/epidemiologia , Hepatite E/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos Teóricos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , Vacinação/economia , Vacinas contra Hepatite Viral/administração & dosagem , Adulto Jovem
7.
Epidemiol Infect ; 145(5): 908-913, 2017 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28100286

RESUMO

This study aimed to estimate the disease burden of hepatitis E in a rural region in China. A total of 489 hepatitis E cases were reported according to a community-based survey in an active hepatitis surveillance system between 2008 and 2015, the questionnaire and record-review methods were constructed to evaluate the economic and health burden of hepatitis E virus infections from societal perspectives. All costs were converted to US$ in 2015. The age-standardized cumulative incidence rate was 107·9/100 000, and the median age-standardized annual incidence rate was 16·5/100 000. The median direct, indirect, and intangible cost were $1046·0, $49·1, and $77·3/patient, respectively, and the median economic burden per patient was $1836·5, which accounted for 51·2% of per capita disposable income. Moreover, the median quality-adjusted life year and visual analogue scale score were 0·7 and 70·0/case, respectively. Both economic burden and health burden of inpatients was more serious than that of outpatients (P < 0·001). Disease burden of hepatitis E is heavy on patients, their families, and society. More studies on the disease burden of hepatitis E are necessary to increase social awareness of the disease and confirm reasonable disease-control measures.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Hepatite E/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , China/epidemiologia , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Hepatite E/economia , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Anos de Vida Ajustados por Qualidade de Vida , População Rural , Adulto Jovem
8.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 12(8): 2003-2009, 2016 08 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26900799

RESUMO

Objective To estimate the cost-effectiveness of hepatitis E vaccination among pregnant women in epidemic regions. Methods A decision tree model was constructed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of 3 hepatitis E virus vaccination strategies from societal perspectives. The model parameters were estimated on the basis of published studies and experts' experience. Sensitivity analysis was used to evaluate the uncertainties of the model. Results Vaccination was more economically effective on the basis of the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER< 3 times China's per capital gross domestic product/quality-adjusted life years); moreover, screening and vaccination had higher QALYs and lower costs compared with universal vaccination. No parameters significantly impacted ICER in one-way sensitivity analysis, and probabilistic sensitivity analysis also showed screening and vaccination to be the dominant strategy. Conclusion Screening and vaccination is the most economical strategy for pregnant women in epidemic regions; however, further studies are necessary to confirm the efficacy and safety of the hepatitis E vaccines.


Assuntos
Análise Custo-Benefício , Hepatite E/economia , Hepatite E/prevenção & controle , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/economia , Complicações Infecciosas na Gravidez/prevenção & controle , Vacinas Virais/economia , Vacinas Virais/imunologia , China/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Epidemias , Feminino , Hepatite E/epidemiologia , Humanos , Gravidez , Vacinação/economia , Vacinação/estatística & dados numéricos , Vacinas Virais/administração & dosagem
9.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 61(3): 505-10, 1999 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10497999

RESUMO

Hepatitis E disease is responsible for substantial morbidity in Nepal. A socioeconomic analysis was performed to describe the costs and the effects of hepatitis E disease (HE) on health status in a Nepalese population living in the Kathmandu Valley. A modified health status index was used to quantify healthy days lost associated with HE. One hundred thirty-four individuals recently recovered from HE were interviewed in June 1998. The median age was 22 years and 60% were female. Study participants were sick and bedridden for a median of 22 and 10 days, respectively. The median healthy days lost per individual was 35 (768,000 total per region). The median cost of illness per individual, including direct and indirect, was $37 ($1,238,676 total per region). The percentage of yearly income lost for wage earners totaled 19.4%. Hepatitis E disease is associated with significant costs and loss of healthy days in Nepal. Further research is warranted to understand and limit this common disease.


Assuntos
Efeitos Psicossociais da Doença , Hepatite E/economia , Hepatite E/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Avaliação da Deficiência , Feminino , Indicadores Básicos de Saúde , Hepatite E/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Masculino , Morbidade , Nepal/epidemiologia , Fatores Socioeconômicos , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA