Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 79
Filtrar
1.
BMC Palliat Care ; 22(1): 22, 2023 Mar 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36915062

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Opioid-induced constipation (OIC) is a common symptom in cancer patients treated with opioids with a prevalence of up to 59%. International guidelines recommend standard laxatives such as macrogol/electrolytes and magnesium hydroxide to prevent OIC, although evidence from randomized controlled trials is largely lacking. The aim of our study is to compare magnesium hydroxide with macrogol /electrolytes in the prevention of OIC in patients with incurable cancer and to compare side-effects, tolerability and cost-effectiveness. METHODS: Our study is an open-label, randomized, multicenter study to examine if magnesium hydroxide is non-inferior to macrogol/electrolytes in the prevention of OIC. In total, 330 patients with incurable cancer, starting with opioids for pain management, will be randomized to treatment with either macrogol/electrolytes or magnesium hydroxide. The primary outcome measure is the proportion of patients with a score of < 30 on the Bowel Function Index (BFI), measured on day 14. The Rome IV criteria for constipation, side effects of and satisfaction with laxatives, pain scores, quality of life (using the EQ-5D-5L), daily use of laxatives and escape medication, and cost-effectiveness will also be assessed. DISCUSSION: In this study we aim to examine if magnesium hydroxide is non-inferior to macrogol/electrolytes in the prevention of OIC. The outcome of our study will contribute to prevention of OIC and scientific evidence of guidelines on (opioid-induced) constipation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05216328 and in the Dutch trial register: NTR80508. EudraCT number 2022-000408-36.


Assuntos
Neoplasias , Constipação Induzida por Opioides , Humanos , Hidróxido de Magnésio/efeitos adversos , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Laxantes/uso terapêutico , Constipação Intestinal/induzido quimicamente , Constipação Intestinal/tratamento farmacológico , Constipação Intestinal/prevenção & controle , Constipação Induzida por Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Qualidade de Vida , Neoplasias/complicações , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Polietilenoglicóis/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Estudos Multicêntricos como Assunto
2.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 44(9): 628-636, 2021 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33248174

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The 13C-urea breath test (UBT) is the most widely used non-invasive diagnostic test for Helicobacter pylori. Debate continues to surround the possible interference of antacid intake on its result. This study aims to confirm the non-interference of almagate in the determination of H. pylori by UBT. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Observational, multicentre study in adult patients treated with almagate in whom a UBT (TAUKIT®) was indicated. When the UBT result was negative, use of almagate was stopped for 30 days and the UBT was repeated. When the result was positive, no further determinations were made. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who, having had a negative result in the first breath test, were positive in the second after having stopped taking almagate (UBT false negatives, possibly attributable to almagate). RESULTS: Of the 167 evaluable patients, 59% were female, average age was 49 and 97% had gastrointestinal symptoms. The result of the first UBT was negative in 71% of cases. Of these, in the second UBT test after stopping the almagate, the negative result was confirmed in 97.5%. Out of the total number of cases evaluated, the rate of false negatives was 1.8%. CONCLUSIONS: Taking almagate has minimal or no interference in the result of UBT for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection. It can therefore be used in the weeks prior to a UBT.


Assuntos
Hidróxido de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Antiácidos/administração & dosagem , Testes Respiratórios/métodos , Carbonatos/administração & dosagem , Infecções por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Helicobacter pylori , Hidróxido de Magnésio/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Alumínio/efeitos adversos , Antiácidos/efeitos adversos , Testes Respiratórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Isótopos de Carbono , Carbonatos/efeitos adversos , Dispepsia/tratamento farmacológico , Reações Falso-Negativas , Feminino , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Hidróxido de Magnésio/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Espanha , Fatores de Tempo , Ureia
3.
Adv Ther ; 37(12): 4848-4865, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32996010

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Increasing dialysate magnesium (D-Mg2+) appears to be an intriguing strategy to obtain cardiovascular benefits in subjects with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) on hemodialysis. To date, however, hemodialysis guidelines do not suggest to increase D-Mg2+ routinely set at 0.50 mmol/L. METHODS: A randomized 4-week crossover study aimed at investigating the consequences of increasing D-Mg2+ from 0.50 to 0.75 mmol/L on arterial stiffness, hemodynamic profile, and endothelial function in subjects undergoing hemodialysis. The long-term effect of higher D-Mg2+ on mineral metabolism markers was investigated in a 6-month follow-up. Data were analyzed by linear mixed models for repeated measures. RESULTS: Data of 39 patients were analyzed. Pulse wave velocity and pulse pressure significantly decreased on the higher D-Mg2+ compared with the standard one by - 0.91 m/s (95% confidence interval - 1.52 to - 0.29; p = 0.01) and - 9.61 mmHg (- 18.89 to - 0.33, p = 0.04), respectively. A significant reduction in systolic blood pressure of - 12.96 mmHg (- 24.71 to - 1.22, p = 0.03) was also observed. No period or carryover effects were observed. During the long-term follow-up phase the higher D-Mg2+ significantly increased ionized and total serum Mg (respectively from 0.54 to 0.64 and from 0.84 to 1.07 mmol/L; mean percentage change from baseline to follow-up + 21% and + 27%; p ≤ 0.001), while parathormone (PTH) decreased significantly (from 36.6 to 34.4 pmol/L; % change - 11%, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Increasing dialysate magnesium improves vascular stiffness in subjects undergoing maintenance hemodialysis. The present findings merit a larger trial to evaluate the effects of 0.75 mmol/L D-Mg2+ on major clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was retrospectively registered on the ISRCTN registry (ISRCTN 74139255) on 18 June 2020.


Assuntos
Soluções para Diálise/uso terapêutico , Falência Renal Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Hidróxido de Magnésio/uso terapêutico , Rigidez Vascular/efeitos dos fármacos , Administração Oral , Adulto , Idoso , Biomarcadores/sangue , Pressão Sanguínea/efeitos dos fármacos , Cálcio/sangue , Estudos Cross-Over , Soluções para Diálise/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hemodinâmica/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Hidróxido de Magnésio/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise de Onda de Pulso , Diálise Renal
4.
J Pharm Pharmacol ; 68(11): 1359-1365, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27671833

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Raltegravir is a human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 integrase strand transfer inhibitor currently marketed at a dose of 400 mg twice daily (BID). Raltegravir for once-daily regimen (QD) at a dose of 1200 mg is under development. The effect of calcium carbonate and magnesium/aluminium hydroxide antacids on the pharmacokinetics of a 1200 mg dose of raltegravir was assessed in this study. METHODS: An open-label, four-period, four-treatment, fixed-sequence study in 20 HIV-infected patients was performed. Patients needed to be on raltegravir as part of a stable treatment regimen for HIV, and upon entry into the trial received 5 days of 1200 mg raltegravir as pretreatment, before they entered the four-period study: 1200 mg of raltegravir alone (period 1), calcium carbonate antacid as TUMS® Ultra Strength (US) 1000 and 1200 mg raltegravir given concomitantly (Period 2), magnesium/aluminium hydroxide antacid as 20 ml MAALOX® Maximum Strength substitute MS given 12 h after administration of 1200 mg raltegravir (period 3), and calcium carbonate antacid as TUMS® US 1000 given 12 h after administration of 1200 mg raltegravir (period 4). Patients received their dose of 1200 mg QD raltegravir during the intervals between periods to re-establish steady state. AUC0-24 , C24 , Cmax and Tmax were calculated from the individual plasma concentrations of 1200 mg QD raltegravir after administration alone or with a calcium carbonate antacid or with a staggered dose of a calcium carbonate antacid or magnesium/aluminium hydroxide antacid. Adverse events, in addition to laboratory safety tests (haematology, serum chemistry and urinalysis), 12-lead electrocardiograms and vital signs were assessed. KEY FINDINGS: All treatments were well tolerated in the study. Metal-cation antacids variably affected the pharmacokinetics of 1200 mg QD raltegravir. When calcium carbonate antacid was given with 1200 mg raltegravir concomitantly, the geometric mean ratio (GMR) and its associated 90% confidence interval (90% CI) for AUC0-24 , Cmax and C24 h were 0.28 (0.24, 0.32), 0.26 (0.21, 0.32) and 0.52 (0.45, 0.61), respectively. When calcium carbonate antacid and magnesium/aluminium hydroxide were given 12 h after raltegravir 1200 mg QD dosing, the GMR (90% CI) values for AUC0-24 and Cmax were 0.90 (0.80, 1.03), 0.98 (0.81, 1.17), and 0.86 (0.73, 1.03), 0.86 (0.65, 1.15), respectively. However, significant reduction in the trough concentrations of raltegravir was observed: C24 h 0.43 (0.36, 0.51) in the presence of calcium carbonate antacids and 0.42 (0.34, 0.52) in presence of magnesium/aluminium hydroxide, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the use of metal-cation antacids with 1200 mg QD raltegravir is not recommended.


Assuntos
Hidróxido de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Antiácidos/administração & dosagem , Carbonato de Cálcio/administração & dosagem , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores de Integrase de HIV/farmacocinética , Hidróxido de Magnésio/administração & dosagem , Magnésio/administração & dosagem , Raltegravir Potássico/farmacocinética , Administração Oral , Adulto , Hidróxido de Alumínio/efeitos adversos , Antiácidos/efeitos adversos , Área Sob a Curva , Carbonato de Cálcio/efeitos adversos , Esquema de Medicação , Combinação de Medicamentos , Interações Medicamentosas , Feminino , Infecções por HIV/diagnóstico , Infecções por HIV/virologia , Inibidores de Integrase de HIV/administração & dosagem , Inibidores de Integrase de HIV/efeitos adversos , Inibidores de Integrase de HIV/sangue , Humanos , Magnésio/efeitos adversos , Hidróxido de Magnésio/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Taxa de Depuração Metabólica , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Polimedicação , Raltegravir Potássico/administração & dosagem , Raltegravir Potássico/efeitos adversos , Raltegravir Potássico/sangue
5.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (8): CD009118, 2016 Aug 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27531591

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Constipation within childhood is an extremely common problem. Despite the widespread use of osmotic and stimulant laxatives by health professionals to manage constipation in children, there has been a long standing paucity of high quality evidence to support this practice. OBJECTIVES: We set out to evaluate the efficacy and safety of osmotic and stimulant laxatives used to treat functional childhood constipation. SEARCH METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane IBD Group Specialized Trials Register from inception to 10 March 2016. There were no language restrictions. We also searched the references of all included studies, personal contacts and drug companies to identify studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which compared osmotic or stimulant laxatives to placebo or another intervention, with participants aged 0 to 18 years old were considered for inclusion. The primary outcome was frequency of defecation. Secondary endpoints included faecal incontinence, disimpaction, need for additional therapies and adverse events. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Relevant papers were identified and two authors independently assessed the eligibility of trials, extracted data and assessed methodological quality using the Cochrane risk of bias tool. The primary outcome was frequency of defecation. Secondary endpoints included faecal incontinence, disimpaction, need for additional therapies and adverse events. For continuous outcomes we calculated the mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using a fixed-effect model. For dichotomous outcomes we calculated the risk ratio (RR) and 95% CI using a fixed-effect model. The Chi(2) and I(2) statistics were used to assess statistical heterogeneity. A random-effects model was used in situations of unexplained heterogeneity. We assessed the overall quality of the evidence supporting the primary and secondary outcomes using the GRADE criteria. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-five RCTs (2310 participants) were included in the review. Fourteen studies were judged to be at high risk of bias due to lack of blinding, incomplete outcome data and selective reporting. Meta-analysis of two studies (101 patients) comparing polyethylene glycol (PEG) with placebo showed a significantly increased number of stools per week with PEG (MD 2.61 stools per week, 95% CI 1.15 to 4.08). Common adverse events in the placebo-controlled studies included flatulence, abdominal pain, nausea, diarrhoea and headache. Participants receiving high dose PEG (0.7 g/kg) had significantly more stools per week than low dose PEG (0.3 g/kg) participants (1 study, 90 participants, MD 1.30, 95% 0.76 to 1.84). Meta-analysis of 6 studies with 465 participants comparing PEG with lactulose showed a significantly greater number of stools per week with PEG (MD 0.70 , 95% CI 0.10 to 1.31), although follow-up was short. Patients who received PEG were significantly less likely to require additional laxative therapies. Eighteen per cent (27/154) of PEG patients required additional therapies compared to 31% (47/150) of lactulose patients (RR 0.55, 95% CI 0.36 to 0.83). No serious adverse events were reported with either agent. Common adverse events in these studies included diarrhoea, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and pruritis ani. Meta-analysis of 3 studies with 211 participants comparing PEG with milk of magnesia showed that the stools per week were significantly greater with PEG (MD 0.69, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.89). However, the magnitude of this difference was quite small and may not be clinically significant. One child was noted to be allergic to PEG, but there were no other serious adverse events reported. One study found a significant difference in stools per week favouring milk of magnesia over lactulose (MD -1.51, 95% CI -2.63 to -0.39, 50 patients), Meta-analysis of 2 studies with 287 patients comparing liquid paraffin (mineral oil) with lactulose revealed a relatively large statistically significant difference in the number of stools per week favouring liquid paraffin (MD 4.94 , 95% CI 4.28 to 5.61). No serious adverse events were reported. Adverse events included abdominal pain, distention and watery stools. No statistically significant differences in the number of stools per week were found between PEG and enemas (1 study, 90 patients, MD 1.00, 95% CI -1.58 to 3.58), dietary fibre mix and lactulose (1 study, 125 patients, P = 0.481), senna and lactulose (1 study, 21 patients, P > 0.05), lactitol and lactulose (1 study, 51 patients, MD -0.80, 95% CI -2.63 to 1.03), hydrolyzed guar gum and lactulose (1 study, 61 patients, MD 1.00, 95% CI -1.80 to 3.80), PEG and flixweed (1 study, 109 patients, MD 0.00, 95% CI -0.33 to 0.33), PEG and dietary fibre (1 study, 83 patients, MD 0.20, 95% CI -0.64 to 1.04), and PEG and liquid paraffin (2 studies, 261 patients, MD 0.35, 95% CI -0.24 to 0.95). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The pooled analyses suggest that PEG preparations may be superior to placebo, lactulose and milk of magnesia for childhood constipation. GRADE analyses indicated that the overall quality of the evidence for the primary outcome (number of stools per week) was low or very low due to sparse data, inconsistency (heterogeneity), and high risk of bias in the studies in the pooled analyses. Thus, the results of the pooled analyses should be interpreted with caution because of quality and methodological concerns, as well as clinical heterogeneity, and short follow-up. There is also evidence suggesting the efficacy of liquid paraffin (mineral oil). There is no evidence to demonstrate the superiority of lactulose when compared to the other agents studied, although there is a lack of placebo controlled studies. Further research is needed to investigate the long term use of PEG for childhood constipation, as well as the role of liquid paraffin. The optimal dose of PEG also warrants further investigation.


Assuntos
Constipação Intestinal/tratamento farmacológico , Laxantes/uso terapêutico , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Defecação/efeitos dos fármacos , Fibras na Dieta/efeitos adversos , Fibras na Dieta/uso terapêutico , Enema , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Lactulose/efeitos adversos , Lactulose/uso terapêutico , Laxantes/efeitos adversos , Hidróxido de Magnésio/efeitos adversos , Hidróxido de Magnésio/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Óleo Mineral/efeitos adversos , Óleo Mineral/uso terapêutico , Osmose , Polietilenoglicóis/efeitos adversos , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Extrato de Senna/efeitos adversos , Extrato de Senna/uso terapêutico , Senosídeos , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Eksp Klin Gastroenterol ; (7): 91-3, 2014.
Artigo em Russo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25842412

RESUMO

This clinical case and the literature review show possible development of methemoglobinemia due to the use of local anesthetics, included in drugs for the gastrointestinal diseases treatment, in particular benzocaine, which is the methaemoglobin forming agent. These drugs are common and often taken by the patients themselves without any control. The aim of our paper is to draw the attention of physicians to the risk of the widely known drug administration which can be purchased without a prescription.


Assuntos
Hidróxido de Alumínio/efeitos adversos , Benzocaína/efeitos adversos , Hidróxido de Magnésio/efeitos adversos , Metemoglobinemia/induzido quimicamente , Hidróxido de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Alumínio/uso terapêutico , Benzocaína/administração & dosagem , Benzocaína/uso terapêutico , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Hidróxido de Magnésio/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Magnésio/uso terapêutico , Metemoglobina/análise , Metemoglobinemia/sangue , Metemoglobinemia/terapia , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Int J Pharm ; 454(1): 259-68, 2013 Sep 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23850817

RESUMO

The aim of this work was to develop new mucoadhesive buccal patches containing an inorganic fluorinated compound, MgAl-F, intended for decay prevention. Firstly MgAl-F was synthesized and characterized, then the patches were prepared starting from a physical blend of mucoadhesive polymers (NaCMC and polycarbophil) in which MgAl-F was dispersed in different amounts in order to obtain the films. The prepared mucoadhesive patches were characterized in terms of swelling capacity, mucoadhesion force and time, surface morphology and in vitro release studies. Moreover, the organoleptic properties and acceptability have been evaluated by in vivo application. The performed studies demonstrated that the proposed formulations are practical, manageable, flexible and adaptable to the biological substrate showing, at the same time, good organoleptic properties. Moreover, the presence of the MgAl-F is able to decrease the strong adhesion of the employed polymers, reducing pain and irritations resulting in a high patient acceptability. Data obtained from release studies revealed that the application of small patch portions is enough able to release, for a prolonged time, an amount of fluoride ions able to reach the efficacious dose. These observations suggest the applicability of such formulations for buccal administration of different active ingredients.


Assuntos
Hidróxido de Alumínio/química , Cariostáticos/química , Portadores de Fármacos , Fluoretos Tópicos/química , Hidróxido de Magnésio/química , Fluoreto de Sódio/química , Resinas Acrílicas/química , Adesividade , Administração Bucal , Hidróxido de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Alumínio/efeitos adversos , Carboximetilcelulose Sódica/química , Cariostáticos/administração & dosagem , Química Farmacêutica , Preparações de Ação Retardada , Formas de Dosagem , Fluoretos Tópicos/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Cinética , Hidróxido de Magnésio/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Magnésio/efeitos adversos , Fluoreto de Sódio/administração & dosagem , Solubilidade , Tecnologia Farmacêutica/métodos
8.
J Dig Dis ; 14(9): 463-8, 2013 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23659834

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to investigate whether hydrotalcite was comparable to esomeprazole, a proton pump inhibitor, in on-demand therapy for non-erosive reflux disease (NERD). METHODS: This was a multicenter, randomized, open-label clinical trial with initial and on-demand therapy. Patients who had complete symptom relief in the initial therapy were randomized to either hydrotalcite or esomeprazole in the on-demand therapy. The percentage of patients who quit on-demand therapy in the two groups and the cost-effectiveness of the treatment were evaluated as primary end points. The rate of symptom relief and the improvement of symptom score for initial therapy and the weekly average symptom score and weekly average number of days on treatment for on-demand therapy were evaluated as secondary end points. RESULTS: In total, 398 patients were recruited in the initial therapy group, among whom 253 were included in on-demand therapy, with 127 patients in the hydrotalcite group and the remaining 126 in the esomeprazole group. 14 (11.0%) patients in the hydrotalcite group and six (4.8%) in the esomeprazole group quit the on-demand therapy due to unsatisfactory symptom control (P = 0.065). Cost-effectiveness calculated as the ratio of the cost of hydrotalcite to that of esomeprazole (per person/day) was 35.3% in the on-demand therapy. Similar number of patients achieved symptom relief in both groups. CONCLUSION: Hydrotalcite is a good option of on-demand therapy for NERD patients due to its cost-effectiveness and speed of action.


Assuntos
Hidróxido de Alumínio/uso terapêutico , Esomeprazol/uso terapêutico , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/tratamento farmacológico , Hidróxido de Magnésio/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Hidróxido de Alumínio/efeitos adversos , Hidróxido de Alumínio/economia , Antiácidos/efeitos adversos , Antiácidos/economia , Antiácidos/uso terapêutico , Antiulcerosos/efeitos adversos , Antiulcerosos/economia , Antiulcerosos/uso terapêutico , Análise Custo-Benefício , Custos de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Esomeprazol/efeitos adversos , Esomeprazol/economia , Feminino , Refluxo Gastroesofágico/economia , Humanos , Hidróxido de Magnésio/efeitos adversos , Hidróxido de Magnésio/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/economia , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
9.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (7): CD009118, 2012 Jul 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22786523

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Constipation within childhood is an extremely common problem. Despite the widespread use of osmotic and stimulant laxatives by health professionals to manage constipation in children, there has been a long standing paucity of high quality evidence to support this practice. OBJECTIVES: We set out to evaluate the efficacy and safety of osmotic and stimulant laxatives used to treat functional childhood constipation. SEARCH METHODS: The search (inception to May 7, 2012) was standardised and not limited by language and included electronic searching (MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Functional Bowel Disorders Group Specialized Trials Register), reference searching of all included studies, personal contacts and drug companies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) which compared osmotic or stimulant laxatives with either placebo or another intervention, with patients aged 0 to 18 years old were considered for inclusion. The primary outcome was frequency of defecation. Secondary endpoints included faecal incontinence, disimpaction, need for additional therapies and adverse events. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Relevant papers were identified and the authors independently assessed the eligibility of trials. Methodological quality was assessed using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.The Cochrane RevMan software was used for analyses. Patients with final missing outcomes were assumed to have relapsed. For continuous outcomes we calculated a mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) using a fixed-effect model. For dichotomous outcomes we calculated an odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) using a fixed-effect model. The chi square and I(2) statistics were used to assess statistical heterogeneity. A random-effects model was used in situations of unexplained heterogeneity MAIN RESULTS: Eighteen RCTs (1643 patients) were included in the review. Nine studies were judged to be at high risk of bias due to lack of blinding, incomplete outcome data and selective reporting. Meta-analysis of two studies (101 patients) comparing polyethylene glycol (PEG) with placebo showed a significantly increased number of stools per week with PEG (MD 2.61 stools per week, 95% CI 1.15 to 4.08). Common adverse events in the placebo-controlled studies included flatulence, abdominal pain, nausea, diarrhoea and headache. Meta-analysis of 4 studies with 338 participants comparing PEG with lactulose showed significantly greater stools per week with PEG (MD 0.95 stools per week, 95% CI 0.46 to 1.44), although follow up was short. Patients who received PEG were significantly less likely to require additional laxative therapies. Eighteen per cent of PEG patients required additional therapies compared to 30% of lactulose patients (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.89). No serious adverse events were reported with either agent. Common adverse events in these studies included diarrhoea, abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting and pruritis ani. Meta-analysis of 3 studies with 211 participants comparing PEG with milk of magnesia showed that the stools/wk was significantly greater with PEG (MD 0.69 stools per week, 95% CI 0.48 to 0.89). However, the magnitude of this difference is quite small and may not be clinically significant. One child was noted to be allergic to PEG, but there were no other serious adverse events reported. Meta-analysis of 2 studies with 287 patients comparing liquid paraffin (mineral oil) with lactulose revealed a relatively large statistically significant difference in the number of stools per week favouring paraffin (MD 4.94 stools per week, 95% CI 4.28 to 5.61). No serious adverse events were reported. Adverse events included abdominal pain, distention and watery stools. No statistically significant differences in the number of stools per week were found between PEG and enemas (1 study, 90 patients, MD 1.00, 95% CI -1.58 to 3.58), dietary fibre mix and lactulose (1 study, 125 patients, P = 0.481), senna and lactulose (1 study, 21 patients, P > 0.05), lactitol and lactulose (1 study, 51 patients, MD -0.80, 95% CI -2.63 to 1.03), and PEG and liquid paraffin (1 study, 158 patients, MD 0.70, 95% CI -0.38 to 1.78). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The pooled analyses suggest that PEG preparations may be superior to placebo, lactulose and milk of magnesia for childhood constipation. GRADE analyses indicated that the overall quality of the evidence for the primary outcome (number of stools per week) was low or very low due to sparse data, inconsistency (heterogeneity), and high risk of bias in the studies in the pooled analyses. Thus, the results of the pooled analyses should be interpreted with caution because of quality and methodological concerns, as well as clinical heterogeneity, and short follow up. However, PEG appears safe and well tolerated. There is also evidence suggesting the efficacy of liquid paraffin (mineral oil), which was also well tolerated.There is no evidence to demonstrate the superiority of lactulose when compared to the other agents studied, although there is a lack of placebo controlled studies. Further research is needed to investigate the long term use of PEG for childhood constipation, as well as the role of liquid paraffin.


Assuntos
Constipação Intestinal/tratamento farmacológico , Laxantes/uso terapêutico , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Defecação/efeitos dos fármacos , Defecação/fisiologia , Fibras na Dieta/efeitos adversos , Fibras na Dieta/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Lactente , Lactulose/efeitos adversos , Lactulose/uso terapêutico , Laxantes/efeitos adversos , Hidróxido de Magnésio/efeitos adversos , Hidróxido de Magnésio/uso terapêutico , Óleo Mineral/efeitos adversos , Óleo Mineral/uso terapêutico , Osmose , Polietilenoglicóis/efeitos adversos , Polietilenoglicóis/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Álcoois Açúcares/efeitos adversos , Álcoois Açúcares/uso terapêutico
10.
J Am Osteopath Assoc ; 111(8): 469-72, 2011 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21862754

RESUMO

CONTEXT: Postoperative ileus is a major complication of abdominal surgical procedures OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incidence of ileus and gastrointestinal morbidity in patients who received immediate postoperative feeding and bowel stimulation after undergoing major gynecologic surgical procedures. METHODS: During a 5-year period, the authors tracked demographic, surgical outcome, and follow-up information for 707 patients who underwent major gynecologic operations. All patients received the same postoperative orders, including immediate feeding of a diet of choice and bowel stimulation with 30 mL of magnesium hydroxide (milk of magnesia) twice daily until bowel movements occurred. RESULTS: Of 707 patients, 6 (<1%) had postoperative ileus. No patients experienced postoperative bowel obstruction and 2 patients (0.3%) had postoperative intestinal leak. No serious adverse effects associated with bowel stimulation were reported. CONCLUSION: Immediate postoperative feeding and bowel stimulation is a safe and effective approach to preventing ileus in patients who undergo major gynecologic surgical procedures.


Assuntos
Período de Recuperação da Anestesia , Catárticos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos em Ginecologia/efeitos adversos , Íleus/etiologia , Acetaminofen , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Catárticos/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Íleus/prevenção & controle , Incidência , Cetorolaco de Trometamina , Tempo de Internação , Hidróxido de Magnésio/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Magnésio/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morfina , Oxicodona , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
11.
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis ; 69(3): 271-4, 2011 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21353950

RESUMO

We report on a scrub typhus patient who contracted meningoencephalitis during doxycycline administration. This is the first case of scrub typhus in which doxycycline concentrations were measured in serum and cerebrospinal fluid. Clinicians should be alerted to the possibility that meningoencephalitis can occur because of inadequate maintenance of serum doxycycline level caused by antacids administered along with doxycycline.


Assuntos
Hidróxido de Alumínio/uso terapêutico , Antiácidos/uso terapêutico , Carbonatos/uso terapêutico , Doxiciclina/uso terapêutico , Hidróxido de Magnésio/uso terapêutico , Meningoencefalite/microbiologia , Tifo por Ácaros/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Hidróxido de Alumínio/efeitos adversos , Antiácidos/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Carbonatos/efeitos adversos , Doxiciclina/sangue , Doxiciclina/líquido cefalorraquidiano , Humanos , Hidróxido de Magnésio/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Meningoencefalite/tratamento farmacológico , Orientia tsutsugamushi , Tifo por Ácaros/microbiologia
12.
Curr Med Res Opin ; 24(4): 1231-5, 2008 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18355422

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Rosuvastatin, a 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitor used for the treatment of dyslipidaemia, may be co-administered with antacids in clinical practice. This trial assessed the effect of simultaneous and separated administration of an antacid preparation containing aluminium hydroxide 220 mg/5 mL and magnesium hydroxide 195 mg/5 mL (co-magaldrox 195/220) on the pharmacokinetics of rosuvastatin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A randomised, open-label, three-way crossover trial was performed. Healthy male volunteers (n = 14) received a single dose of rosuvastatin 40 mg alone, rosuvastatin 40 mg plus 20 mL antacid suspension taken simultaneously, and rosuvastatin 40 mg plus 20 mL antacid suspension taken 2 h after rosuvastatin on three separate occasions with a washout of > or = 7 days between each. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary parameters were area under the rosuvastatin plasma concentration-time curve from time zero to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC(0-t)) and maximum observed rosuvastatin plasma concentration (C(max)) in the absence and presence of antacid. RESULTS: When rosuvastatin and antacid were given simultaneously, the antacid reduced the rosuvastatin AUC(0-t) by 54% (90% confidence interval [CI] for the treatment 0.40-0.53) and C(max) by 50% (90% CI 0.41-0.60). When the antacid was given 2 h after rosuvastatin, the antacid reduced the rosuvastatin AUC(0-t) by 22% (90% CI 0.68-0.90) and the C(max) by 16% (90% CI 0.70-1.01). The effect of repeated antacid administration was not studied and it cannot be discounted that this may have resulted in a stronger interaction than that observed here. CONCLUSIONS: Simultaneous dosing with rosuvastatin and antacid resulted in a decrease in rosuvastatin systemic exposure of approximately 50%. This effect was mitigated when antacid was administered 2 h after rosuvastatin.


Assuntos
Hidróxido de Alumínio/efeitos adversos , Antiácidos/efeitos adversos , Anticolesterolemiantes/farmacocinética , Fluorbenzenos/farmacocinética , Hidróxido de Magnésio/efeitos adversos , Pirimidinas/farmacocinética , Sulfonamidas/farmacocinética , Adulto , Hidróxido de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Antiácidos/administração & dosagem , Anticolesterolemiantes/administração & dosagem , Área Sob a Curva , Disponibilidade Biológica , Estudos Cross-Over , Esquema de Medicação , Interações Medicamentosas , Fluorbenzenos/administração & dosagem , Humanos , Inibidores de Hidroximetilglutaril-CoA Redutases/farmacocinética , Hidróxido de Magnésio/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pirimidinas/administração & dosagem , Rosuvastatina Cálcica , Sulfonamidas/administração & dosagem , Fatores de Tempo
13.
J Card Surg ; 22(4): 281-6, 2007.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17661767

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Postoperative atrial fibrillation has been refractory to many attempted pharmacologic prevention methods and, when effective, side effects have been described. The present aim was to study the clinical compliance of a suggested prophylactic treatment, oral sotalol, and magnesium. METHODS: Coronary-bypass patients without clinical contraindications to receive oral sotalol (80 mg twice daily) and magnesium supplementation were enrolled (n = 49) with an intention-to-treat strategy and being compared with a matched control group (n = 844). A protocol listed exclusion criteria of clinical compliance that was postoperatively evaluated prior to and during treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of the 49 enrolled patients (55%) were compliant to sustain the treatment according to the protocol. The remaining patients were postoperatively excluded, mainly because of hemodynamic reasons, of whom 14 were noncompliant to initiate any treatment. The AF occurrence in the compliant group was 7% versus 36% in noncompliant patients (p = 0.035), and 24% in the control group (p = 0.076). However, with an intention-to-treat policy the overall AF incidence became 18%. The subgroups of enrolled patients demonstrated skewing phenomena. The noncompliant group had higher requirement for inotropic support (p = 0.029) and longer aortic cross-clamp time (p = 0.048) compared to compliant patients. Further, the body weight of noncompliant patients was markedly lower than in the compliant counterpart (p = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: The tested treatment protocol showed limited compliance among routine cardiac-surgery patients, and further, introduced a biased selection of patients that skewed the results and may have partly explained the treatment effect.


Assuntos
Antiarrítmicos/administração & dosagem , Fibrilação Atrial/tratamento farmacológico , Ponte de Artéria Coronária , Hidróxido de Magnésio/administração & dosagem , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/tratamento farmacológico , Sotalol/administração & dosagem , Recusa do Paciente ao Tratamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Administração Oral , Idoso , Antiarrítmicos/efeitos adversos , Fibrilação Atrial/epidemiologia , Ponte Cardiopulmonar , Estudos Transversais , Quimioterapia Combinada , Eletrocardiografia/efeitos dos fármacos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Humanos , Hidróxido de Magnésio/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Viés de Seleção , Sotalol/efeitos adversos , Estatística como Assunto
15.
Rheumatol Int ; 27(7): 679-81, 2007 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17171347

RESUMO

Non-prescribed antacid drugs that contain magnesium and aluminum are widely used in the treatment of gastritis and peptic ulcer. One of the side effects of these antacid drugs is that they bind phosphate in the gut and result in its malabsorption. In this paper, a 42-year-old female patient who used magnesium hydroxide (Magnesie calcinee powder 100 g) to benefit from its laxative feature, and developed osteomalacia after losing 90 kg in 2 years will be presented by going through the related literature. She had widespread joint pain and could hardly walk without the help. Ca, P and vitamin D were at lower limit of normal, ALP, Mg and PTH were increased in her laboratory tests. There were stress fractures at the femur neck and at the upper part of the tibia in plane radiographies. The patient was hospitalized with the diagnosis of osteomalacia and she was treated successfully.


Assuntos
Antiácidos/efeitos adversos , Catárticos/efeitos adversos , Fraturas do Colo Femoral/etiologia , Hidróxido de Magnésio/efeitos adversos , Osteomalacia/induzido quimicamente , Adulto , Antiácidos/administração & dosagem , Catárticos/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Fraturas do Colo Femoral/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Hidróxido de Magnésio/administração & dosagem , Osteomalacia/complicações , Osteomalacia/diagnóstico por imagem , Radiografia , Fraturas da Tíbia/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas da Tíbia/etiologia
16.
Ann Clin Biochem ; 42(Pt 2): 149-52, 2005 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15829127

RESUMO

The well-described long-term effects of sustained exposure to aluminium in patients with end-stage renal failure (ESRF) are a result of uptake and storage of aluminium, leading to cellular toxicity. A case is presented suggesting that this aluminium may be mobilizable, and indicating the consequence of such release. A patient on haemodialysis (HD) presented acutely with infection, a raised CRP, decreased conscious level, impaired cognition and agitation. Subsequent neurological recovery over six to seven days appeared to follow the return of markedly elevated plasma aluminium concentrations to basal (i.e. from 25.2 micromol/L to 2.5 micromol/L; reference range < 0.5 micromol/L), coupled with a resolution of the infection. The patient was on long-term aludrox therapy 3 g/day, and showed relative resistance to the exogenous hormone erythropoietin, resulting in a refractory anaemia and suggesting aluminium toxicity. A series of HD patients (n = 5) presenting with bacteraemia, not on aludrox, showed no appreciable rise in the plasma aluminium mean of 1.3 micromol/L (SD 0.9; range 0.6-2.0 micromol/L). We suggest that infection can result in release of tissue aluminium, leading to acutely elevated plasma aluminium concentrations and signs of neurotoxicity. The amount of tissue storage and resultant aluminium release seemed to be related to the use of aluminium hydroxide as a phosphate binder.


Assuntos
Alumínio/sangue , Alumínio/toxicidade , Infecções/complicações , Falência Renal Crônica/complicações , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso/induzido quimicamente , Idoso , Hidróxido de Alumínio/efeitos adversos , Hidróxido de Alumínio/metabolismo , Combinação de Medicamentos , Humanos , Hidróxido de Magnésio/efeitos adversos , Hidróxido de Magnésio/metabolismo , Masculino , Diálise Renal/efeitos adversos
17.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 11(4): 139-43, 2005 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16595065

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The objectives of this study were (1) to describe the usage of topical oral solutions in patients experiencing chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis (CIOM); and (2) to survey the care of oral mucositis provided to patients by clinical oncology pharmacists in institutional settings. METHODS: Surveys were distributed to institutional pharmacists in the US, who were asked to provide the components of their 'magic mouthwash'. Other questions included whether an institutional mucositis management guideline is available and what is the involvement of clinical pharmacy in mucositis care. RESULTS: Forty institutions returned surveys during the study period. The top five ingredients used to compound the magic mouthwash are diphenhydramine, viscous lidocaine, magnesium hydroxide/aluminum hydroxide, nystatin and corticosteroids. Most institutions administer the mouthwash every 4 hours (36%) or every 6 hours (36%). Of the surveyed institutions, 33% currently possess guidelines for the management of CIOM. CONCLUSIONS: Most institutions in the country formulate their topical solution, or magic mouthwash, with a variety of ingredients. There is a need to standardize the ingredients used to compound the magic mouthwash, in order to fully evaluate the efficacy of the solution to manage CIOM.


Assuntos
Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças da Boca/induzido quimicamente , Antissépticos Bucais/efeitos adversos , Mucosite/induzido quimicamente , Administração Bucal , Corticosteroides/administração & dosagem , Corticosteroides/efeitos adversos , Corticosteroides/química , Hidróxido de Alumínio/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Alumínio/efeitos adversos , Hidróxido de Alumínio/química , Difenidramina/administração & dosagem , Difenidramina/efeitos adversos , Difenidramina/química , Composição de Medicamentos , Revisão de Uso de Medicamentos/métodos , Humanos , Lidocaína/administração & dosagem , Lidocaína/efeitos adversos , Lidocaína/química , Hidróxido de Magnésio/administração & dosagem , Hidróxido de Magnésio/efeitos adversos , Hidróxido de Magnésio/química , Antissépticos Bucais/administração & dosagem , Antissépticos Bucais/química , Nistatina/administração & dosagem , Nistatina/efeitos adversos , Nistatina/química , Assistência Farmacêutica/classificação , Assistência Farmacêutica/estatística & dados numéricos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA