Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 21
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
PLoS Med ; 18(7): e1003682, 2021 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34197449

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: We assessed the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic in India on the consumption of antibiotics and hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in the private sector in 2020 compared to the expected level of use had the epidemic not occurred. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We performed interrupted time series (ITS) analyses of sales volumes reported in standard units (i.e., doses), collected at regular monthly intervals from January 2018 to December 2020 and obtained from IQVIA, India. As children are less prone to develop symptomatic severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, we hypothesized a predominant increase in non-child-appropriate formulation (non-CAF) sales. COVID-19-attributable changes in the level and trend of monthly sales of total antibiotics, azithromycin, and HCQ were estimated, accounting for seasonality and lockdown period where appropriate. A total of 16,290 million doses of antibiotics were sold in India in 2020, which is slightly less than the amount in 2018 and 2019. However, the proportion of non-CAF antibiotics increased from 72.5% (95% CI: 71.8% to 73.1%) in 2019 to 76.8% (95% CI: 76.2% to 77.5%) in 2020. Our ITS analyses estimated that COVID-19 likely contributed to 216.4 million (95% CI: 68.0 to 364.8 million; P = 0.008) excess doses of non-CAF antibiotics and 38.0 million (95% CI: 26.4 to 49.2 million; P < 0.001) excess doses of non-CAF azithromycin (equivalent to a minimum of 6.2 million azithromycin treatment courses) between June and September 2020, i.e., until the peak of the first epidemic wave, after which a negative change in trend was identified. In March 2020, we estimated a COVID-19-attributable change in level of +11.1 million doses (95% CI: 9.2 to 13.0 million; P < 0.001) for HCQ sales, whereas a weak negative change in monthly trend was found for this drug. Study limitations include the lack of coverage of the public healthcare sector, the inability to distinguish antibiotic and HCQ sales in inpatient versus outpatient care, and the suboptimal number of pre- and post-epidemic data points, which could have prevented an accurate adjustment for seasonal trends despite the robustness of our statistical approaches. CONCLUSIONS: A significant increase in non-CAF antibiotic sales, and particularly azithromycin, occurred during the peak phase of the first COVID-19 epidemic wave in India, indicating the need for urgent antibiotic stewardship measures.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/economia , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , Uso de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Hidroxicloroquina/economia , Pandemias/economia , SARS-CoV-2 , Antibacterianos/provisão & distribuição , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , COVID-19/economia , Comércio/estatística & dados numéricos , Composição de Medicamentos , Uso de Medicamentos/economia , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/provisão & distribuição , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapêutico , Índia , Análise de Séries Temporais Interrompida , Pandemias/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
Lupus Sci Med ; 8(1)2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33875571

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To report the results of a survey exploring the experience of patients with SLE facing hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) shortage that occurred during the early phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: A survey was designed by Lupus Europe's patient advisory network and distributed through its social media, newsflash and members' network. People with lupus were asked about their last HCQ purchases and their level of anxiety (on a 0-10 scale) with regard to not being able to have access to HCQ, once in April 2020 (first wave) and after 11 August (second wave). The results were compared. RESULTS: 2075 patients responded during the first wave; 1001 (48.2%) could get HCQ from the first place they asked, 230 (11.1%) could get the drug by going to more than one pharmacy, 498 (24.0%) obtained HCQ later from their usual pharmacy and 126 (6.1%) from other sources. 188 (9.1%) could not get any; 32 (1.5%) did not respond to this question. All countries showed significant improvement in HCQ availability during the second wave. 562 (27.4%) patients reported an extremely high level of anxiety in wave 1 and 162 (10.3%) patients in wave 2; 589 (28.7%) and 268 (17.1%) patients reported a high level of anxiety in wave 1 and wave 2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The HCQ shortage had a significant impact on patients with SLE and has been responsible for psychological consequences including anxiety. Indeed, despite an objective improvement in drug availability, the event is leaving significant traces in patients' mind and behaviours.


Assuntos
Ansiedade , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Serviços Comunitários de Farmácia/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Hidroxicloroquina , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico , Antirreumáticos/provisão & distribuição , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Ansiedade/diagnóstico , Ansiedade/etiologia , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Defesa Civil/métodos , Defesa Civil/normas , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/provisão & distribuição , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapêutico , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/tratamento farmacológico , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/epidemiologia , Lúpus Eritematoso Sistêmico/psicologia , Angústia Psicológica , SARS-CoV-2 , Autorrelato/estatística & dados numéricos , Inquéritos e Questionários
5.
Front Public Health ; 8: 585832, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33381485

RESUMO

Background: Countries have introduced a variety of measures to prevent and treat COVID-19 with medicines and personal protective equipment (PPE), with some countries adopting preventative strategies earlier than others. However, there has been considerable controversy surrounding some treatments. This includes hydroxychloroquine where the initial hype and misinformation lead to shortages, price rises and suicides. Price rises and shortages have also been seen for PPE. Such activities can have catastrophic effects on patients where there are high co-payment levels and issues of affordability. Consequently, there is a need to investigate this further. Objective: Assess changes in the availability, utilization and prices of relevant medicines and PPE during the pandemic among a range of Asian countries. Our approach: Narrative literature review combined with interviews among community pharmacists to assess changes in consumption, prices and shortages of medicines and PPE from the beginning of March 2020 until end of May 2020. In addition, suggestions on ways to reduce misinformation. Results: 308 pharmacists took part from five Asian countries. There was an appreciable increase in the utilization of antimicrobials in Pakistan (in over 88% of pharmacies), with lower increases or no change in Bangladesh, India, Malaysia and Vietnam. Encouragingly, there was increased use of vitamins/immune boosters and PPE across the countries, as well as limited price rises for antimicrobials in India, Malaysia and Vietnam, although greater price rises seen for analgesics and vitamin C/immune boosters. Appreciable price increases were also seen for PPE across some countries. Conclusion: Encouraging to see increases in utilization of vitamins/immune boosters and PPE. However, increases in the utilization and prices of antimicrobials is a concern that needs addressing alongside misinformation and any unintended consequences from the pandemic. Community pharmacists can play a key role in providing evidence-based advice, helping to moderate prices, as well as helping address some of the unintended consequences of the pandemic.


Assuntos
COVID-19/terapia , Custos e Análise de Custo , Medicamentos Essenciais , Saúde Pública , Ásia , Medicamentos Essenciais/economia , Medicamentos Essenciais/provisão & distribuição , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/provisão & distribuição , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapêutico , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/economia , Equipamento de Proteção Individual/provisão & distribuição , Farmácias/provisão & distribuição
6.
Clin Rheumatol ; 39(11): 3205-3213, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32996071

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on rheumatology practice. METHOD: A cross-sectional web survey was designed by the members of the Arab League of Associations for Rheumatology (ArLAR), validated by its scientific committee and disseminated through e-mail and social media. It included close-ended questions about the impact of the pandemic on the rheumatology activities, including outpatient visits and hospitalizations (in percentage, 100% corresponds to complete suspension) and open-ended questions about unmet needs. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to evaluate the predictors of impact. Suggestions were developed to improve the practice. RESULTS: A total of 858 rheumatologists were included in the analysis (27.3% of registered in ArLAR), 37% were 35-44 years old, 60% were females, and 48% worked in the private sector. The impact of COVID-19 was a decrease of 69% in hospitalizations, 65% in outpatient clinic, 56% in infusion centers, and 43% in income. It was associated with the region (highest in the Gulf), use of telemedicine, impact on income and practice sector (lowest in private). There was a hydroxychloroquine shortage in 47%. Telemedicine was mostly based on traditional telephone contacts and e-mails and reimbursed in 12%. Fifteen rheumatologists (1.8%) were infected and 156 cases of COVID-19 were reported among patients. The top-cited unmet needs in rheumatology practice were access to drugs and a telemedicine platform. CONCLUSIONS: The negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on rheumatology practice may compromise rheumatic diseases control. Better access to drugs and providing telemedicine platforms are recommended to improve the practice. Key Points • The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant negative impact on the rheumatology practice, including access to outpatient clinic, hospitalization, and to anchor drugs. • The compromised access to rheumatology care may jeopardize the control of chronic rheumatic diseases and the long-term prognosis. • Better access to drugs and providing telemedicine platforms are strongly recommended.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial , Infecções por Coronavirus , Atenção à Saúde , Hospitalização , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral , Reumatologia , Telemedicina , Adulto , Idoso , Antirreumáticos/provisão & distribuição , Mundo Árabe , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Feminino , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/provisão & distribuição , Renda , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Padrões de Prática Médica , Mecanismo de Reembolso , SARS-CoV-2 , Inquéritos e Questionários , Telefone
7.
Chest ; 158(6): 2414-2424, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32805237

RESUMO

Critical drug shortages have been widely documented during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, particularly for IV sedatives used to facilitate mechanical ventilation. Surges in volume of patients requiring mechanical ventilation coupled with prolonged ventilator days and the high sedative dosing requirements observed quickly led to the depletion of "just-in-time" inventories typically maintained by institutions. This manuscript describes drug shortages in the context of global, manufacturing, regional and institutional perspectives in times of a worldwide crisis such as a pandemic. We describe etiologic factors that lead to drug shortages including issues related to supply (eg, manufacturing difficulties, supply chain breakdowns) and variables that influence demand (eg, volatile prescribing practices, anecdotal or low-level data, hoarding). In addition, we describe methods to mitigate drug shortages as well as conservation strategies for sedatives, analgesics and neuromuscular blockers that could readily be applied at the bedside. The COVID-19 pandemic has accentuated the need for a coordinated, multi-pronged approach to optimize medication availability as individual or unilateral efforts are unlikely to be successful.


Assuntos
COVID-19/terapia , Indústria Farmacêutica , Internacionalidade , Preparações Farmacêuticas/provisão & distribuição , Antivirais/provisão & distribuição , COVID-19/epidemiologia , Cuidados Críticos , Desastres , Combinação de Medicamentos , Reposicionamento de Medicamentos , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/provisão & distribuição , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/provisão & distribuição , Inventários Hospitalares , Tempo de Internação , Lopinavir/provisão & distribuição , Respiração Artificial , Ritonavir/provisão & distribuição , Estoque Estratégico , Capacidade de Resposta ante Emergências , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration
8.
Rheumatol Int ; 40(10): 1599-1611, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32710198

RESUMO

The aim of this work is to trace how rheumatologists all over Egypt are approaching the COVID-19 pandemic and what changes it has brought about in the patients' care with special attention to its effect on vulnerable rheumatic disease (RD) patients. This survey further aims to help inform the rheumatology community about the changes in practice during the COVID-19 pandemic. The survey included 26 questions distributed to University staff members across Egypt members of the Egyptian College of Rheumatology (ECR). It takes 5-10 min to fill out. The practice setting of participating rheumatologists included University Teaching Hospitals that are the main rheumatology and clinical immunology service providers for adults and children RD patients. There was an overall agreement across the country in the responses to the survey that took a median time of 7 min to fill in. Potential changes in rheumatology outpatient practice by staff members evolved since the COVID-19 pandemic. None of the university rheumatology staff members has prescribed chloroquine or HCQ to prevent or treat COVID-19 in a non-hospitalized patient who was not previously on it. Twenty-three recommended decrease/avoid NSAIDs if the RD patient had confirmed COVID-19 or symptoms. There is an agreement to the key emerging frontline role of rheumatologists in treating COVID-19. During the pandemic, RD cases requiring admission were dealt with by several modified strategies. The overall agreement among the different university rheumatology departments during such critical situation has provoked the ECR to consider providing provisional guidelines for dealing with RD patients during this global catastrophe.


Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios não Esteroides/uso terapêutico , Antirreumáticos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Padrões de Prática Médica/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças Reumáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Reumatologistas/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Ambulatorial/estatística & dados numéricos , Antirreumáticos/provisão & distribuição , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Coronavirus/prevenção & controle , Desprescrições , Egito/epidemiologia , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/provisão & distribuição , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapêutico , Pandemias/prevenção & controle , Pneumonia Viral/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Viral/prevenção & controle , Reumatologia , SARS-CoV-2 , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19
12.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 102(6): 1172-1174, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32358952

RESUMO

The first case of novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in the Dominican Republic coincided with a period of political crisis. Distrust in governmental institutions shaped the critical phase of early response. Having a weak public health infrastructure and a lack of public trust, the Ministry of Health (MoH) began the fight against COVID-19 with a losing streak. Within 45 days of the first reported case, the political crisis and turmoil caused by "fake news" are limiting the capacity and success of the MoH response to the pandemic.


Assuntos
Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Betacoronavirus/patogenicidade , Infecções por Coronavirus/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/epidemiologia , Mídias Sociais/ética , Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Antivirais/provisão & distribuição , Azitromicina/provisão & distribuição , Azitromicina/uso terapêutico , Betacoronavirus/efeitos dos fármacos , COVID-19 , Distúrbios Civis , Infecções por Coronavirus/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Coronavirus/economia , Dissidências e Disputas , República Dominicana/epidemiologia , Reposicionamento de Medicamentos , Humanos , Hidroxicloroquina/provisão & distribuição , Hidroxicloroquina/uso terapêutico , Ivermectina/provisão & distribuição , Ivermectina/uso terapêutico , Pandemias/economia , Pneumonia Viral/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumonia Viral/economia , Política , Saúde Pública/economia , Saúde Pública/tendências , SARS-CoV-2 , Confiança/psicologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA