Postprandial Hyperchylomicronemia and Thin-Cap Fibroatheroma in Nonculprit Lesions.

Objective- Although postprandial hypertriglyceridemia can be a risk factor for coronary artery disease, the extent of its significance remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the correlation between the postprandial lipid profiles rigorously estimated with the meal tolerance test and the presence of lipid-rich plaque, such as thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA), in the nonculprit lesion. Approach and Results- A total of 30 patients with stable coronary artery disease who underwent a multivessel examination using optical coherence tomography during catheter intervention for the culprit lesion were enrolled. Patients were divided into 2 groups: patients with TCFA (fibrous cap thickness ≤65 µm) in the nonculprit lesion and those without TCFA. Serum remnant-like particle-cholesterol and ApoB-48 (apolipoprotein B-48) levels were measured during the meal tolerance test. The value of remnant-like particle-cholesterol was significantly greater in the TCFA group than in the non-TCFA group ( P=0.045). Although the baseline ApoB-48 level was similar, the increase in the ApoB-48 level was significantly higher in the TCFA group than in the non-TCFA group ( P=0.028). In addition, the baseline apolipoprotein C-III levels was significantly greater in the TCFA group ( P=0.003). These indexes were independent predictors of the presence of TCFA (ΔApoB-48: odds ratio, 1.608; 95% confidence interval, 1.040-2.486; P=0.032; apolipoprotein C-III: odds ratio, 2.581; 95% confidence interval, 1.177-5.661; P=0.018). Conclusions- Postprandial hyperchylomicronemia correlates with the presence of TCFA in the nonculprit lesion and may be a residual risk factor for coronary artery disease.

Design and rationale of the ODYSSEY DM-DYSLIPIDEMIA trial: lipid-lowering efficacy and safety of alirocumab in individuals with type 2 diabetes and mixed dyslipidaemia at high cardiovascular risk.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is often associated with mixed dyslipidaemia, where non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL-C) levels may more closely align with cardiovascular risk than low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). We describe the design and rationale of the ODYSSEY DM-DYSLIPIDEMIA study that assesses the efficacy and safety of alirocumab, a proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitor, versus lipid-lowering usual care in individuals with T2DM and mixed dyslipidaemia at high cardiovascular risk with non-HDL-C inadequately controlled despite maximally tolerated statin therapy. For the first time, atherogenic cholesterol-lowering with a PCSK9 inhibitor will be assessed with non-HDL-C as the primary endpoint with usual care as the comparator. METHODS: DM-DYSLIPIDEMIA is a Phase 3b/4, randomised, open-label, parallel group, multinational study that planned to enrol 420 individuals. Main inclusion criteria were T2DM and mixed dyslipidaemia (non-HDL-C ≥100 mg/dl [≥2.59 mmol/l], and triglycerides ≥150 and <500 mg/dl [≥1.70 and <5.65 mmol/l]) with documented atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease or ≥1 additional cardiovascular risk factor. Participants were randomised (2:1) to alirocumab 75 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) or lipid-lowering usual care on top of maximally tolerated statin (or no statin if intolerant). If randomised to usual care, investigators were able to add their pre-specified choice of one of the following to the patient's current statin regimen: ezetimibe, fenofibrate, omega-3 fatty acids or nicotinic acid, in accordance with local standard-of-care. Alirocumab-treated individuals with non-HDL-C ≥100 mg/dl at week 8 will undergo a blinded dose increase to 150 mg Q2W at week 12. The primary efficacy endpoint is non-HDL-C change from baseline to week 24 with alirocumab versus usual care; other lipid levels (including LDL-C), glycaemia-related measures, safety and tolerability will also be assessed. Alirocumab will be compared to fenofibrate in a secondary analysis. RESULTS: Recruitment completed with 413 individuals randomised in 14 countries worldwide. Results of this trial are expected in the second quarter of 2017. CONCLUSIONS: ODYSSEY DM-DYSLIPIDEMIA will provide information on the efficacy and safety of alirocumab versus lipid-lowering usual care in individuals with T2DM and mixed dyslipidaemia at high cardiovascular risk using non-HDL-C as the primary efficacy endpoint. Trial registration NCT02642159 (registered December 24, 2015).

Plasma sICAM levels during standard exercise test are higher in postmenopausal women with mixed hyperlipemia. sICAM level in postmenopausal women.

Aim: Plasma sICAM, sVCAM, endothelin- 1 (ET-1), TNF-a, its soluble receptor levels and nitric oxide production evaluation during standard exercise test in postmenopausal women with mixed hyperlipidemia. Material and methods: 35 white, normotensive, non-smoking, postmenopusal women. Group A consisted of 24 women normal plasma cholesterol and triglicerides. Group B- 11 women hypercholesterolemic and hypertrigliceridemic. Basic fasting plasma FSH, 17b- -estradiol, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, triglicerides, HDL-cholesterol were measured. Standard exercise test was carried out according to Bruce protocol. During the test blood samples were taken trice (prior to, at peak exercise, at15th minute of recovery). The sICAM, sVCAM, ET-1, TNF-a, its soluble receptor and secretion of nitric oxide were measured. Statistical analysis: Fisher test and t-Welch test were used. Results: There were no differences between groups A and B in mean plasma concentrations of FSH, estradiol and HDL-cholesterol. Mean plasma total cholesterol, triglicerides and LDL-cholesterol levels were higher in group B compared to group A. Plasma levels of sICAM prior to standard exercise test, at peak exercise and at the 15th minute of recovery were significantly lower in group A compared to group B. Mean plasma sVCAM levels did no differ between groups. NO3 plasma levels was significantly higher at peak exercise in group B compared to group A. There were no significant differences between groups in regard to mean plasma NO2, endothelin-1, TNF-a, and TNF-a receptor levels. Conclusion: Plasma soluble intracellular adhesion molecules levels are higher at rest and during exercise in postmenopausal women with atherosclerosis risk factors.

Severe dyslipidemia in pregnancy: The role of therapeutic apheresis.

During pregnancy physiological changes occur in the lipid metabolism due to changing hormonal conditions: the LDL cholesterol (LDL-C), triglycerides (TG) and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] increase throughout pregnancy. Common lipoprotein disorders are associated in pregnancy with two major clinical disorders: severe hypertriglyceridemia (SHTG) is a potent risk factor for development of acute pancreatitis and elevated cholesterol due to greater concentrations of LDL and remnant lipoproteins and reduced levels of HDL promote atherosclerosis. The combination of homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) and pregnancy can be a fatal condition. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) may be used for an urgent need of a fast and effective lowering of TG levels in order to prevent a severe pancreatitis episode or hypertriglyceridemia-induced complications during pregnancy. LDL apheresis can decrease LDL-C and prevent complications and can be considered in the treatment of pregnancies complicated by high LDL-C. These conditions are configured in patients with HeFH who were taking statins before pregnancy (selected cases), patients already receiving apheresis before pregnancy suffering from HoFH, patients suffering from hypertriglyceridemia due to familial hyperlipoproteinemia types I and V, and cases of hypertriglyceridemia secondary to diabetes.

Effects of 90-day hypolipidemic treatment on insulin resistance, adipokines and proinflammatory cytokines in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia and impaired fasting glucose.

OBJECTIVE: Concerns regarding worsening insulin sensitivity associated with statin treatment have recently emerged. Therefore the aim of this study was to assess and compare the effects of 90-day monotherapies with fenofibrate and atorvastatin, as well as combined therapy, on fasting plasma glucose, insulin resistance index, adipokines (leptin, resistin, adiponectin) and levels of proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-6) in patients with impaired fasting glucose (IFG) and mixed hyperlipidemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 67 patients were randomly assigned to four treatment arms: monotherapy with atorvastatin, monotherapy with fenofibrate, combined therapy (fenofibrate and torvastatin) or therapeutic lifestyle change. The study lasted for 90 days. All participants received counseling regarding proper diet and physical activity. RESULTS: Compared to the control subjects, prediabetic patients exhibited elevated plasma levels of leptin, resistin, TNF-α and IL-6, and a lower plasma level of adiponectin. All therapeutic interventions resulted in significant alterations in the lipid profile. Insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR) was reduced after treatment with fenofibrate. The effect of atorvastatin on insulin resistance was comparable to therapeutic lifestyle change alone. Therapy with hypolipidemic drugs caused increases in adiponectin levels and decreases in leptin and resistin. An additive effect of the combined treatment on plasma IL-6 level was also observed. CONCLUSIONS: Fenofibrate-based treatment was associated with improved insulin sensitivity. Atorvastatin did not cause a deterioration in insulin sensitivity. Hypolipidemic therapies resulted in significant changes in the proinflammatory cytokine network as well as in adipokine levels. At the end of the study the measured parameters nearly resembled those of the healthy subjects.

A case of hypothyroidism and type 2 diabetes associated with type V hyperlipoproteinemia and eruptive xanthomas.

Primary hypothyroidism and type 2 diabetes are both typically associated with the increased level of triglycerides. To date, there have been only a few case reports of type 2 diabetes patients with both type V hyperlipoproteinemia and eruptive xanthomas, but there have been no reports of hypothyroidism patients associated with eruptive xanthomas. We report here on a case of a 48-yr old female patient who was diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and primary hypothyroidism associated with both type V hyperlipoproteinemia and eruptive xanthomas. We found rouleaux formation of RBCs in peripheral blood smear, elevated TSH, and low free T4 level, and dyslipidemia (total cholesterol 18.1 mM/L, triglyceride 61.64 mM/L, HDL 3.0 mM/L, and LDL 2.54 mM/L). She has taken fenofibrate, levothyroxine, and oral hypoglycemic agent for 4 months. After treatment, both TSH level and lipid concentration returned to normal range, and her yellowish skin nodules have also disappeared.

Alterations of HDL subclasses in hyperlipidemia.

BACKGROUND: It is generally accepted that different high-density lipoprotein (HDL) subclasses have distinct but interrelated metabolic functions. HDL is known to directly influence the atherogenic process and changes in HDL subclasses distribution may be related to the incidence and prevalence of atherosclerosis. METHOD: The relative apolipoprotein (apo)A-I contents (% apoA-I) of plasma HDL subclasses were determined by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis coupled with immunodetection for apoA-I, in 39 hypercholesterolemic (HTC) subjects, 97 hypertriglyceridemic (HTG) subjects and 32 mixed hyperlipidemic (MHL) subjects, and 124 normolipidemic subjects. RESULTS: The relative apoA-I contents of prebeta(1)-HDL, prebeta(2)-HDL, HDL(3c), HDL(3b) and HDL(3a) significantly increased while HDL(2a) and HDL(2b) significantly decreased in hyperlipidemic subjects. In HTC subjects of hyperlipidemia, the concentrations of prebeta(1)-HDL were significantly lower and HDL(2b) concentrations were significantly higher than in HTG and MHL subjects. In HTG subjects, the concentrations of HDL(3a) were significantly higher and the concentrations of HDL(2b) were lower than in HTC and MHL subjects. In total hyperlipidemic subjects, plasma triglyceride (TG) concentrations showed positive correlation with prebeta(1)-HDL, prebeta(2)-HDL, HDL(3b) and HDL(3a) and negative correlation with HDL(2a) and HDL(2b). The total cholesterol (TC) concentrations showed positive correlation with the relative apoA-I contents of prebeta(1)-HDL and HDL(3b), whereas the HDL-C concentrations showed negative correlation with the relative apoA-I contents of prebeta(1)-HDL and HDL(3a) and positive correlation with those of HDL(2a) and HDL(2b). The relative apoA-I contents of prebeta(1)-HDL, prebeta(2)-HDL, HDL(3b), and HDL(3a) were positively correlated whereas those of HDL(2a) and HDL(2b) were negatively correlated with TG/HDL-C ratio. CONCLUSION: The particle size of HDL in hyperlipidemic subjects shifted towards smaller sizes, which, in turn, indicates that the maturation of HDL may be abnormal in hyperlipidemic subjects.

Two cases with transient lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity impairment: evidence for the possible involvement of an LPL inhibitor.

UNLABELLED: Two independent severe hypertriglyceridemic infants with transiently impaired lipoprotein lipase (LPL) activity were observed and the causes were explored. Both infants were female, born prematurely with low birth weight and developed hypertriglyceridemia (Fredrickson type V hyperlipidemia: high VLDL and low LDL/HDL) a few months after birth. While mass levels of their post-heparin plasma LPL and apoprotein C-II (apo C-II), a physiological activator of LPL, were normal, their post-heparin plasma LPL activities were remarkably impaired. Both of their mothers' post-heparin plasma LPL activities were slightly or moderately impaired as well, without a decrease in the LPL mass level. No mutations in the genes for LPL and apo C-II were detected in either patient. In an in vitro study with their serum at onset, we could not detect any distinct circulating inhibitors for LPL. There was no data supporting infection or autoimmune diseases, which might have an impact on LPL activity, during the follow-up period. Levels of their plasma triglyceride (TG) and total cholesterol (TC) were decreased quickly by a dietary intervention with medium-chain triglyceride (MCT) milk and kept normal even after stopping the intervention at around age 1 year. However, their low post-heparin LPL activity persisted and returned to normal at around age 2 years. Their low HDL cholesterol levels persisted even after recovery of the TG and TC levels, although lecithin:cholesterol acyltransferase (LCAT) and cholesterol-ester-transfer protein (CETP), two key enzymes of HDL metabolism, were normal throughout the course. The exact reasons why their post-heparin LPL activities were impaired for a certain period and why their HDL cholesterol levels have remained low are still unclear. CONCLUSION: Transiently impaired LPL activity with no defect in LPL enzyme induced severe hypertriglyceridemia in infants. The transient occurrence of inhibitor(s) for LPL was proposed.

Combined treatment with fibrates and small doses of atorvastatin in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.

Combined statin and fibrate therapy is often imperative for the improvement of the serum lipid profile in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia. However, the potential risk of myopathy has limited the widespread use of such therapy. Preferably this treatment should involve low optimally tolerable doses of hypolipidemic drugs. Thus, we undertook a study to determine the safety and efficacy of combination therapy with fibrates and small doses of atorvastatin. Twenty-two patients with mixed hyperlipidemia were started on a fibrate regimen (micronised fenofibrate 200mg/day or ciprofibrate 100 mg/day). Because after 12 weeks of therapy the fibrate failed to normalise the serum lipid profile, small doses of atorvastatin (5 mg/day) were added for a further 12 weeks. The administration of the fibrates resulted in a significant decrease in total and LDL-cholesterol levels, as well as in triglycerides, and an increase in HDL-cholesterol levels. The addition of atorvastatin (5 mg/day) resulted in a further decrease in total and LDL-cholesterol levels. Consequently, the hypolipidemic therapy target was achieved in most of the patents. Combination therapy was well tolerated and no significant increases in serum liver and muscle enzymes were noticed. We conclude that the careful administration of small doses of atorvastatin in patients with mixed dyslipidemia receiving fibrates is associated with a significant amelioration of lipid abnormalities.

Effect of atorvastatin and bezafibrate on plasma levels of C-reactive protein in combined (mixed) hyperlipidemia.

C-reactive protein (CRP) is a non-specific but sensitive marker of underlying systemic inflammation. High CRP plasma levels correlate with risk for future cardiovascular events. The present study evaluated the effects of atorvastatin (10-40 mg) and bezafibrate (400 mg) on CRP concentrations after 6 and 12 months of treatment in 103 patients with combined (mixed) hyperlipidemia. The number of cardiovascular risk factors present in a given patient was associated with baseline CRP levels. After 6 months and 1 year, atorvastatin treatment was associated with significant (P<0.001) decreases from baseline of CRP concentrations by 29 and 43%, respectively, while bezafibrate-treated patients showed non-significant reductions of 2.3 and 14.6%, respectively (P=0.056 and 0.005 for the respective differences between the two treatment arms at 6 months and 1 year). The magnitude of change in CRP after 1 year was directly related to baseline CRP levels. Covariance analysis showed that CRP decreases in the atorvastatin group were unrelated to total cholesterol and LDL cholesterol reductions; however, they were directly related to triglyceride changes (r=0.28, P=0.047) and inversely related to HDL cholesterol changes (r=-0.28, P=0.045). A model including baseline CRP values and treatment effect showed that atorvastatin use was a significant predictor of change in CRP levels over time (beta=0.82, P=0.023). These results suggest a potential anti-atherosclerotic additional benefit of atorvastatin in patients at a risk of cardiovascular disease.

The effect of atorvastatin on serum lipids, lipoprotein(a) and plasma fibrinogen levels in primary dyslipidaemia--a pilot study involving serial sampling.

We conducted an open-label study to test the effects of atorvastatin on serum lipids, lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and plasma fibrinogen levels. A total of 90 dyslipidaemic, non-smoking patients (45 patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia and 45 patients with primary mixed hyperlipidaemia) aged 48 +/- 11 years were studied. The patients were treated with 20 mg of atorvastatin for 24 weeks, in a single nocturnal dose. At baseline and every eight weeks, the fasting lipid profile, together with serum Lp(a) and plasma fibrinogen levels (Clauss method), were measured. Atorvastatin was highly effective in normalising the serum lipid profile. No significant change in median serum Lp(a) levels was observed in the whole group of patients (0.14 g/l before, vs. 0.16 g/l after, treatment) as well as in patients with raised (> 0.30 g/l) baseline levels (n = 32). A small non-significant increase of plasma fibrinogen was found (3.04 g/l vs. 3.14 g/l) after 24 weeks of atorvastatin administration. The effects of atorvastatin on both these variables did not differ in patients with hypercholesterolaemia or mixed hyperlipidaemia. In conclusion, our findings suggest that the effect of atorvastatin on plasma fibrinogen levels in dyslipidaemic patients without evident vascular disease is not clinically relevant. Furthermore, any rise in fibrinogen levels that may occur is likely to be transient in nature. Further studies are necessary to clarify this issue. There was no evidence that atorvastatin influences serum Lp(a) levels.

Homocysteine and lipid lowering agents. A comparison between atorvastatin and fenofibrate in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.

BACKGROUND: Hyperhomocysteinemia is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Elevation in homocysteine levels has recently been demonstrated during lipid lowering treatment with fibrates. We compared the effect of a statin and a fibrate (atorvastatin and fenofibrate) on plasma levels of homocysteine and other thiol compounds in hyperlipidemic patients. METHOD AND RESULTS: The study was of open randomized, parallel design with a preliminary screening phase, and a 6 week placebo period. After the placebo period, patients were allocated randomly to atorvastatin or fenofibrate for a 6 month period. Plasma thiols were assayed by high pressure liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection. There were 29 patients in the fenofibrate group and 24 in the atorvastatin group. Fenofibrate induced a significant increase in both homocysteine and cysteine plasma levels (+35.8 and +18%, respectively, P<0.0001); by contrast, cysteinylglycine remained stable. There were no significant changes in any thiol compounds in the atorvastatin group. Both treatments induced a significant decrease in uric acid, although fenofibrate was noticeably more effective than atorvastatin (-22.8 and -6.4%, respectively). Fenofibrate induced a non-significant increase in creatinine (12%) while atorvastatin reduced it (4.7%, NS). CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that the induction of elevations in plasma homocysteine and cysteine levels are a distinct feature of the pleiotropic effects of fibrates. Further studies are needed not only to investigate the potential deleterious effects of this modification, but also to define the specific mechanism which underlies such fibrate-mediated action.

Efficacy and safety of a combination of fluvastatin and bezafibrate in patients with mixed hyperlipidaemia (FACT study).

Preliminary data suggest that fluvastatin may be safely combined with fibrates. The Fluvastatin Alone and in Combination Treatment Study examined the effects on plasma lipids and safety of a combination of fluvastatin and bezafibrate in patients with coronary artery disease and mixed hyperlipidaemia. A total of 333 patients were randomly allocated in this multicentre double-blind trial to receive 40 mg fluvastatin alone (n=80), 400 mg bezafibrate (n=86), 20 mg fluvastatin+400 mg bezafibrate (n=85) or 40 mg fluvastatin+400 mg bezafibrate (n=82) for 24 weeks. Low-density lipoprotein (LDL)-cholesterol decreased >20% in all fluvastatin-containing regimens, with significantly greater decreases compared with bezafibrate alone (P<0.001). Bezafibrate alone and fluvastatin+bezafibrate combinations resulted in greater increases in high-density lipoprotein (HDL)-cholesterol and decreases in triglycerides compared with fluvastatin alone (P<0.001). Fluvastatin (40 mg)+bezafibrate was the most effective for all lipid parameters with a decrease from baseline at endpoint in LDL-cholesterol of 24%, a decrease in triglycerides of 38% and an increase in HDL-cholesterol of 22%. All treatments were well tolerated with no increase in adverse events for combination therapy versus monotherapy, or between combination regimens. No clinically relevant liver (aspartate aminotransferase [ASAT] or alanine aminotransferase [ALAT]) greater than three times the upper limit of normal) or muscular (creatine phosphokinase (CPK) greater than four times the upper limit of normal) laboratory abnormalities were reported. This large study shows 40 mg fluvastatin in combination with 400 mg bezafibrate to be highly effective and superior to either drug given as monotherapy in mixed hyperlipidaemia, and to be safe and well tolerated.

HDL steady state levels are not affected, but HDL apoA-I turnover is enhanced by Lifibrol in patients with hypercholesterolemia and mixed hyperlipidemia.

Lifibrol (4-(4'-tert-butylphenyl)-1-(4'carboxyphenoxy)-2-butanol) is a new hypocholesterolemic drug effectively reducing total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein (apo) B in experimental animals and in humans. In contrast to fibrates and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors the cholesterol and triglyceride lowering effect of Lifibrol is not accompanied by increases in HDL cholesterol and apoA-I levels. We examined the impact of Lifibrol on the metabolism of HDL apoA-I in patients with hyperlipoproteinemia, using endogenous labeling with stable isotopes. Kinetic studies were performed in five male hypercholesterolemic individuals (type IIa), before and on treatment with 450 mg of Lifibrol daily for 4 weeks and in five male individuals suffering from mixed hyperlipidemia (type IIb), before and on therapy, for 12 weeks. Lifibrol reduced total cholesterol by 14% (P=0.02) and LDL cholesterol by 16% (P=0. 014) in all patients, and decreased triglycerides by 34% in type IIb patients. During Lifibrol therapy, HDL cholesterol and ApoA-I concentrations did not change. Tracer kinetics revealed that the fractional catabolic rate (FCR) of HDL apoA-I increased by 22% (P=0. 013). This increase in the apoA-I FCR was accompanied by a 23% increase in HDL apoA-I production rate (P=0.006). We conclude that Lifibrol, although not changing HDL steady state concentrations, enhances the turnover of apoA-I containing HDL particles.

Effectiveness and safety of alternate-day simvastatin and fenofibrate on mixed hyperlipidemia.

This randomized prospective clinical study evaluated the lipid-lowering effects and safety of a new combination regimen in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia. The data show that alternate-day simvastatin and fenofibrate therapy was as effective as the standard daily combination of the same drugs at the same doses, and it was safer, less expensive, and more tolerable.

Cerivastatin in the treatment of mixed hyperlipidemia: the RIGHT study. The Cerivastatin Study Group. Cerivastatin Gemfibrozil Hyperlipidemia Treatment.

The Cerivastatin Gemfibrozil Hyperlipidemia Treatment (RIGHT) study--a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study--compared the lipid-lowering effects of cerivastatin, once daily at doses of 0.1, 0.2, and 0.3 mg with those of twice-daily gemfibrozil 600 mg in 751 patients with primary mixed hyperlipidemia. Randomization to the first 16 weeks of treatment followed an initial 4-week washout period and subsequent 6-week diet-controlled, placebo run-in phase. Patients continued to receive study medication for a further 36 weeks, with those previously on placebo switched to 0.1 mg/day cerivastatin at the end of week 16. Additional cholestyramine therapy was permitted at week 36 in patients with uncontrolled low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels. Cerivastatin achieved significant dose-dependent reductions in LDL cholesterol of 15-24% after 16 weeks of treatment, compared with reductions of 7.5% with gemfibrozil. Over this period both cerivastatin (0.3 mg) and gemfibrozil (1,200 mg) significantly decreased levels of triglycerides (20.3% vs 50.3%, respectively) and very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) cholesterol (30.8% vs 47.1%, respectively), as well as increasing high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (11.3% vs 13.3%, respectively). The reductions in LDL cholesterol and other atherogenic lipids and lipoproteins at 16 weeks were sustained in the subsequent 36-week double-blind continuation phase, during which time <10% of patients received additional cholestyramine therapy. Both study drugs were well tolerated, with the incidence of adverse events similar to that of placebo treatment. Clinically significant increases in hepatic transaminases and creatine phosphokinase occurred at a similar low frequency of around 1%. This study demonstrated that cerivastatin is a safe, well-tolerated, and effective treatment for lowering elevated LDL cholesterol and triglycerides in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.