Fully Automatic Quantitative Measurement of Equilibrium Radionuclide Angiocardiography Using a Convolutional Neural Network.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to generate deep learning-based regions of interest (ROIs) from equilibrium radionuclide angiography datasets for left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) measurement. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Manually drawn ROIs (mROIs) on end-systolic and end-diastolic images were extracted from reports in a Picture Archiving and Communications System. To reduce observer variability, preprocessed ROIs (pROIs) were delineated using a 41% threshold of the maximal pixel counts of the extracted mROIs and were labeled as ground-truth. Background ROIs were automatically created using an algorithm to identify areas with minimum counts within specified probability areas around the end-systolic ROI. A 2-dimensional U-Net convolutional neural network architecture was trained to generate deep learning-based ROIs (dlROIs) from pROIs. The model's performance was evaluated using Lin's concordance correlation coefficient (CCC). Bland-Altman plots were used to assess bias and 95% limits of agreement. RESULTS: A total of 41,462 scans (19,309 patients) were included. Strong concordance was found between LVEF measurements from dlROIs and pROIs (CCC = 85.6%; 95% confidence interval, 85.4%-85.9%), and between LVEF measurements from dlROIs and mROIs (CCC = 86.1%; 95% confidence interval, 85.8%-86.3%). In the Bland-Altman analysis, the mean differences and 95% limits of agreement of the LVEF measurements were -0.6% and -6.6% to 5.3%, respectively, for dlROIs and pROIs, and -0.4% and -6.3% to 5.4% for dlROIs and mROIs, respectively. In 37,537 scans (91%), the absolute LVEF difference between dlROIs and mROIs was <5%. CONCLUSIONS: Our 2-dimensional U-Net convolutional neural network architecture showed excellent performance in generating LV ROIs from equilibrium radionuclide angiography scans. It may enhance the convenience and reproducibility of LVEF measurements.

Effect of variable left ventricular ejection fraction assessed by equilibrium radionuclide angiocardiography using different software packages on the diagnosis of cardiotoxicity in patients with cancer.

BACKGROUND: The equilibrium radionuclide angiocardiography (ERNA) scan is an established imaging modality for assessing left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in oncology patients. This study aimed to explore the interchangeability of two commercially available software packages (MIM and JS) for LVEF measurement for a cancer-therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD) diagnosis. METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective study among 322 patients who underwent ERNA scans. A total of 582 scans were re-processed using MIM and JS for cross-sectional and longitudinal LVEF measurements. RESULTS: The median LVEF for MIM and JS were 56% and 66%, respectively (P < 0.001). LVEF processed by JS was 9.91% higher than by MIM. In 87 patients with longitudinal ERNA scans, serial studies processed by MIM were classified as having CTRCD in a higher proportion than serial studies processed by JS (26.4% vs 11.4%, P = 0.020). There were no significant differences in intra- or inter-observer LVEF measurement variability (R = 0.99, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Software packages for processing ERNA studies are not interchangeable; thus, reports of ERNA studies should include details on the post-processing software. Serial ERNA studies should be processed on the same software when feasible to avoid discrepancies in the diagnosis and management of CTRCD.

Feasibility of Left Ventricle Ejection Fraction Calculation Using Electrocardiographically Gated SPECT Acquisition of 99m Tc-HDP Bone Scintigraphy in Cardiac Amyloidosis.

ABSTRACT: We performed bone scintigraphy in 6 patients with suspected cardiac amyloidosis. To evaluate feasibility of left ventricle function analysis, we additionally performed electrocardiographically gated SPECT acquisition. The cardiac-gated SPECT data confirmed adequate tracer uptake for automatic myocardial contour determination. LVEF estimations ranged between 24% and 54%. Comparison with LVEF estimations from prior echocardiography generally showed only small differences. In one patient, the LVEF measurements from both methods seemed discordant, probably reflecting actual LVEF worsening, which was confirmed at follow-up echocardiography. Therefore, our results may suggest that cardiac-gated SPECT acquisition at bone scintigraphy can provide meaningful estimates of LVEF.

Gated Tomographic Radionuclide Angiography Using 3D-Ring CZT StarGuide SPECT/CT Head-To-Head Comparison With a Cardiac-Dedicated CZT Camera: First Clinical Use and Validation.

ABSTRACT: Gated tomographic radionuclide angiography can assess and monitor left cardiac function. Dedicated cardiac CZT cameras have enabled dose reduction and quicker acquisitions. New 3D-ring CZT general purpose systems are now available. We report 50 patients who underwent a 7-minute acquisition on a cardiac-dedicated CZT camera and 9 minutes on a new 3D-ring CZT system after mean injection of 321.4 ± 55.9 MBq 99mTc-labelled human serum albumin. There was no significant difference in left ventricular volumes, and left and right ventricular ejection fractions. These preliminary results seem to validate the use of 3D-ring CZT system for LEVF and cardiac function evaluation.

Low-dose dobutamine stress gated blood pool SPECT assessment of left ventricular contractile reserve in ischemic cardiomyopathy: a feasibility study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of gated blood pool single-photon emission computed tomography (GBPS) with low-dose dobutamine (LDD) stress test, performed on a single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) camera equipped with cadmium-zinc-telluride (CZT) solid-state detectors, in assessing of left ventricle (LV) contractile reserve in patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). METHODS: A total of 52 patients (age 59 ± 7.2 years, 47 men and 5 women) with ICM and a control group of 10 patients without obstructive coronary artery lesion underwent GBPS and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) at rest and during LDD stress test (5, 10, 15 µg/kg/min). The duration of each GBPS step was 5 min. Stress-induced changes in LV ejection fraction (ΔLVEF), peak ejection rate, LV volumes, and mechanical dyssynchrony (phase histogram standard deviation, phase histogram bandwidth and entropy) obtained with GBPS were estimated. RESULTS: All GBPS indices except end-diastolic volume showed significant dynamics during stress test in both groups. The majority of parameters in ICM patients showed significant changes at a dobutamine dose of 10 µg/kg/min as compared to the rest study. Seventeen percent of ICM patients, but none from the control group, showed a decrease in LVEF during stress, accompanied by a significant increase in entropy. The intra- and inter-observer reproducibility was excellent for both rest and stress studies. There was a moderate correlation (r = 0.5, p = 0.01) between GBPS and TTE, with a mean difference value of - 1.7 (95% confidence interval - 9.8; 6.4; p = 0.06) in ΔLVEF. CONCLUSION: Low-dose dobutamine stress GBPS performed with high-efficiency CZT-SPECT cameras can be performed for evaluating stress-induced changes in LV contractility and dyssynchrony with lower acquisition time. A dobutamine dose of 10 µg/kg/min can potentially suffice to detect stress-induced changes in patients with ICM during GBPS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04508608 (August 7, 2020).

Polarity status of trigger signal during ECG-gating affects parameters of LV function in gated myocardial perfusion SPECT.

INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND: The polarity status is one of the important items of specifications of trigger signal from cardiac trigger monitors with two options, either positive or negative. Some systems allow the user to set the polarity of trigger signal before imaging. Efforts should be made to set the polarity status according to the recommendations provided by the manufacturers. In case of inappropriate selection, changes in computation of end-systolic and end-diastolic volumes as well as ejection fraction may occur. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of the polarity status of trigger signals in synchronization process during 8- and 16-frame gated SPECT imaging on the systolic and diastolic parameters of LV function. METHODS: Thirty-four patients referred for a myocardial perfusion SPECT were consecutively included in the study. The rest scan for each patient was performed with 8- and 16-frame gating simultaneously with positive trigger signal set by the operator in a cardiac trigger monitor and then repeated after manual selection of negative polarity. In total, the 4 imaging modes acquired were 8-frame/positive-trigger, 16-frame/positive-trigger, 8-frame/negative-trigger, and 16-frame/negative-trigger. All SPECT images were reconstructed and processed with the same values of parameters. Systolic and diastolic indices of LV function were derived in QGS of the Cedars-Sinai software and then were compared using various statistical tests, and a reliability analysis was also performed. RESULTS: The age of patients recruited in the study was 58.41 ± 8.94, and 16 (47.1%) males and 18 (52.9%) females. All the correlation coefficients between corresponding parameters in positive and negative trigger signals were statistically significant. The difference between the parameters of systolic function including EF, EDV, and ESV in positive and negative trigger signals was statistically significant in paired sample t test. Likewise, a statistically significant difference was also found between mean phase angle in scans with positive and negative trigger signals by a phase difference of 147.91 (41.0% of an average cardiac cycle) and 149 (41.3% of an average cardiac cycle) degrees in 8- and 16-frame gating modes, respectively. Strong agreement (according to high values of intra-class correlation coefficient) was found for all four pairs. According to Bland-Altman results, an offset of about 3 percentage units was found, both between imaging in 8-frame gating compared to 16-frame gating, higher value in favor of 16-frame gating, and also between imaging with positive polarity trigger compared to negative-polarity trigger, again higher value in favor of positive-polarity triggering. CONCLUSION: The status of the polarity of trigger signals or similar CTM-camera delays in synchronization process during 8- and 16-frame gated SPECT imaging can be considered as one of the factors that may influence systolic and diastolic indices of LV function.

Comparison of Cadmium Zinc Telluride ECG-gated SPECT equilibrium radionuclide angiocardiography to magnetic resonance imaging to measure right ventricular volumes and ejection fraction in patients with cardiomyopathy.

AIMS: The objective of this study was to determine the accuracy of right ventricular function (RVF) assessed by Cadmium Zinc Telluride ECG-gated SPECT equilibrium radionuclide angiocardiography (CZT-ERNA). METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-one consecutive patients with cardiomyopathy (aged 54 ± 19 years; 62% male) were included. RV ejection fraction (EF) and volumes were analyzed by CZT-ERNA and compared with values obtained by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). Mean values were not different between CZT-ERNA and MRI for RVEF (48.1 ± 10.4% vs 50.8 ± 10.0%; P = .23). Significant correlations (P < .0001) were observed between CZT-ERNA and MRI for RVEF, RV end-diastolic volume, and end-systolic volume (r = 0.81, r = 0.93, and r = 0.96, respectively). Bland-Altman analysis showed a mean difference (bias) between CZT-ERNA and MRI for RVEF of -2.69% (95% CI - 5.35 to - 0.42) with good agreement between the 2 techniques (limits of agreement, -14.3 to 8.99). Intraobserver and interobserver reproducibility of RVF measured by CZT-ERNA was high. CONCLUSION: CZT-ERNA provides accurate, reproducible assessment of RVF and appears as a good alternative to cardiac magnetic resonance for the evaluation of the magnitude of RVF in patients with cardiomyopathy.

Analysis of Differences in Assessment of Left Ventricular Function on Echocardiography and Nuclear Perfusion Imaging.

Two widely used methods for left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (EF) determination, echocardiography (echo) and gated single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), often have wide limits of agreement. Factors influencing discrepancies between core laboratory echo and MPI LVEF determinations were examined in a large series of heart failure (HF) subjects and normal controls. 879 HF and 101 control subjects had core lab analyses of echo and MPI (mean time between procedures 7-8 days). LVEF differences were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance and Bland-Altman plots. Relationships between LVEF differences and patient characteristics and outcome endpoints (mortality and arrhythmias) were explored with logistic regression, Cox proportional hazards models, and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. There was a systematic difference between the 2 modalities; echo LVEF was higher with more severe LV dysfunction, MPI LVEF higher when systolic function was normal. LVEF results were within ±5% in only 37% of HF and 23% of control subjects. Considering discordance around the LVEF threshold 35%, there was disagreement between the 2 methods in 305 HF subjects (35%). Male gender (odds ratio (OR) = 0.200), atrial fibrillation (OR = 2.314), higher body mass index (OR = 1.051) and lower LV end-diastolic volume (OR = 0.985) were the strongest predictors of methodologic discordance. Cardiac event rates were highest if both LVEF values were ≤35% and lowest when both LVEF values were >35%. In conclusion, substantial disagreements between LVEF results by echo and MPI are common. HF patients with LVEF ≤35% by both techniques have the highest 2-year event risk.

Left ventricle function assessment using gated first-pass 18F-FDG PET: Validation against equilibrium radionuclide angiography.

PURPOSE: We appraised the feasibility of left ventricle (LV) function assessment using gated first-pass 18F-FDG PET, and assessed the concordance of the produced measurements with equilibrium radionuclide angiography (ERNA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-four oncologic patients benefited from 99mTc-labeled red-blood-cell ERNA, in planar mode (all patients) and using SPECT (22 patients). All patients underwent gated first-pass 18F-FDG cardiac PET. Gated dynamic PET images were reconstructed over 1 minute during tracer first-pass inside the LV and post-processed using in-house software (TomPool). After re-orientation into cardiac canonical axes and adjustment of the valves plane using a phase image, pseudo-planar PET images obtained by re-projection were automatically segmented using thresholded region growing and gradient-based delineation to produce an LV ejection fraction (EF) estimate. PET images were also post-processed in fully-tomographic mode to produce LV end diastole volume (EDV), end systole volume (ESV), and EF estimates. Concordance was assessed using Lin's concordance (ccc) and Bland-Altman analysis. Reproducibility was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CoV) and intra-class correlation (ICC). RESULTS: Pseudo-planar PET EF estimates were concordant with planar ERNA (ccc = 0.81, P < .001) with a bias of 0% (95% CI [- 2%; 3%], limits of agreement [- 11%; 12%]). Reproducibility was excellent and similar for both methods (CoV = 2 ± 1% and 3 ± 2%, P = NS; ICC = 0.97 and 0.92, for PET and ERNA, respectively). Measurements obtained in fully-tomographic mode were concordant with SPECT ERNA: ccc = 0.83 and bias = - 3 mL for LV EDV, ccc = 0.92 and bias = 0 mL for LV ESV, ccc = 0.89 and bias = - 1% for LV EF (all P values < .001 for ccc, all biases not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Gated first-pass 18F-FDG PET might stand as a relevant alternative to ERNA for LV function assessment, enabling a joint evaluation of both therapeutic response and cardiac toxicity in oncologic patients receiving cardiotoxic chemotherapy.

New approach for quantification of left ventricular function from low-dose gated bloodpool SPECT: Validation and comparison with conventional methods in patients.

BACKGROUND: Planar equilibrium radionuclide angiocardiography (ERNA) has been used as the gold standard for assessment of left ventricular (LV) function for over three decades. However, this imaging modality has recently gained less favor due to growing concerns about radiation exposure. We developed a novel approach that involves integrating short axis slices of gated bloodpool SPECT for quantification of LV function with improved signal-to-noise ratio and reduced radioactive dose while maintaining image quality and quantitative precision. METHODS: Twenty patients referred for ERNA underwent standard in vitro 99mTc-labeling of red blood cells (RBC), and were initially imaged following a low-dose (~ 8 mCi) injection using a dedicated cardiac SPECT camera, and then had planar imaging following a high-dose (~ 25 mCi) injection. Four different quantification methods were utilized to assess the LV function and were compared for quantitative precision and inter-observer reproducibility of the quantitative assessments. RESULTS: The Yale method resulted in the most consistent assessment of LV function compared with the gold standard high-dose ERNA method, along with excellent inter-observer reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: The new low-dose 99mTc-RBC imaging method provides precise quantification of LV function with a greater than 67% reduction in dose and may potentially improve assessment of regional function.

Evaluation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by 99mTc-MIBI gated SPECT and 18F-FDG gated PET in patients with prior myocardial infarction.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the accuracy of gated-SPECT (GSPECT) and gated-PET (GPET) in the assessment of left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic volumes (EDVs), end-systolic volumes (ESVs) and LV ejection fractions (LVEFs) among patients with prior myocardial infarction (MI). METHODS: One hundred and sixty-eight consecutive patients with MI who underwent GSPECT and GPET were included. Of them, 76 patients underwent CMR in addition to the two imaging modalities. The measurements of LV volumes and LVEF were performed using Quantitative Gated SPECT (QGS), Emory Cardiac Toolbox (ECTB), and 4D-MSPECT (4DM). RESULTS: The correlation between GPET, GSPECT, and CMR were excellent for LV EDV (r = 0.855 to 0.914), ESV (r = 0.852 to 0.949), and LVEF (r = 0.618 to 0.820), as calculated from QGS, ECTB, and 4DM. In addition, subgroup analysis revealed that EDV, ESV, and LVEF measured by GPET were accurate in patients with different extents of total perfusion defect (TPD), viable myocardium, and perfusion/metabolic mismatch. Furthermore, multivariate regression analysis identified that mismatch score was associated with the difference in EDV (P < 0.05) measurements between GPET and CMR. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with MI, LV volumes and LVEF scores measured by both GSPECT and GPET imaging were comparable to those determined by CMR, but should not be interchangeable in individual patients.

Equilibrium radionuclide angiography compared with tissue doppler imaging for detection of right ventricular dyssynchrony and prediction of acute response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare tissue doppler imaging (TDI) and equilibrium radionuclide angiography (ERNA) for detection of right ventricular (RV) dyssynchrony and prediction of the acute response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS: This study was approved by the local ethics committee of Huai'an First People's Hospital. Patient consent was not provided due to the use of completely anonymous images from which the individual could not be identified in this study. Thirty-three patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy underwent both TDI and ERNA before and within 48 hour after CRT implantation. RV dyssynchrony was measured with TDI using the difference in time to peak systolic velocity between the RV free wall and ventricular septum (RV-T). With ERNA, the standard of RV mean phase angle and RV phase standard deviation (RVmPA% and RVPSD%) were assessed. RESULTS: Moderate positive correlations were observed among baseline RVmPA%, RVPSD% and RV-T (r = 0.689 and 0.716, P < .001). Twenty patients (61%) with a reduction of at least 15% in LV end-systolic volume were categorized as acute responders after CRT. Responders showed significant reduction in RVmPA% and RVPSD% after CRT (53.60 ±â€Š4.15% to 43.95 ±â€Š6.88% and 14.00 ±â€Š2.41% to 10.40 ±â€Š1.67%, P < .05), whereas RV-T remained unchanged (50.10 ±â€Š10.28 ms to 49.25 ±â€Š13.64ms, NS). Receiver operating characteristic curve showed that the cut-off value of RV-T was 48.5ms, yielding 65% sensitivity and 77% specificity to predict acute respond to CRT. The cut-off value of RVmPA% was 49.5%, yielding 85% sensitivity and 85% specificity and the cut-off value of RVPSD% was 11.5%, yielding 85% sensitivity and 92% specificity. CONCLUSION: ERNA might be an appropriate alternative to TDI for assessment of RV dyssynchrony. Either RVmPA% or RVPSD% was highly predictive for acute response to CRT.

Assessment of four different cardiac softwares for evaluation of LVEF with CZT-SPECT vs CMR in 48 patients with recent STEMI.

PURPOSE: To compare, vs CMR, four softwares: quantitative gated SPECT (QGS), myometrix (MX), corridor 4DM (4DM), and Emory toolbox (ECTb) to evaluate left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), end-systolic (ESV), and end-diastolic volumes (EDVs) by gated MPI CZT-SPECT. METHODS: 48 patients underwent MPI CZT-SPECT and CMR 6 weeks after STEMI, LV parameters were measured with four softwares at MPI CZT-SPECT vs CMR. We evaluated (i) concordance and correlation between MPI CZT-SPECT and CMR, (ii) concordance MPI CZT-SPECT/CMR for the categorical evaluation of the left ventricular dysfunction, and (iii) impacts of perfusion defects > 3 segments on concordance. RESULTS: LVEF: LCC QGS/CMR = 0.81 [+ 2.2% (± 18%)], LCC MX/CMR = 0.83 [+ 1% (± 17.5%)], LCC 4DM/CMR = 0.73 [+ 3.9% (± 21%)], LCC ECTb/CMR = 0.69 [+ 6.6% (± 21.1%)]. ESV: LCC QGS/CMR = 0.90 [- 8 mL (± 40 mL)], LCC MX/CMR = 0.90 [- 9 mL (± 36 mL)], LCC 4DM/CMR = 0.89 [+ 4 mL (± 45 mL)], LCC ECTb/CMR = 0.87 [- 3 mL (± 45 mL)]. EDV: LCC QGS/CMR = 0.70 [- 16 mL (± 67 mL)], LCC MX/CMR = 0.68 [- 21 mL (± 63 mL], LCC 4DM/CMR = 0.72 [+ 9 mL (± 73 mL)], LCC ECTb/CMR = 0.69 [+ 10 mL (± 70 mL)]. CONCLUSION: QGS and MX were the two best-performing softwares to evaluate LVEF after recent STEMI.

Ventricular peak emptying and filling rates measured by gated tomographic radionuclide angiography using a cadmium-zinc-telluride SPECT camera in chemotherapy-naïve cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: Radionuclide angiography is widely used for left ventricular function assessment. This study establishes normative data and inter-study repeatability on peak ventricular filling and emptying rates obtained by a cadmium-zinc-telluride SPECT camera. METHOD: Cancer patients (N = 764) without diabetes or cardiovascular diseases referred for baseline assessment of cardiac function were included. Repeatability was assessed in 46 patients where two separate acquisitions were performed. Left and right ventricular emptying rates (LPER, RPER) and filling rates (LPFR, RPFR) were obtained and whenever possible also atrial filling rates (PFRa). RESULTS: Filling rates were higher in women than men. Emptying rates tended to increase with age, whereas filling rates and the E/A ratio decreased. One patient was excluded from the repeatability analysis due to an unexplained high intra-observer variation. Intraclass correlation coefficients for LPER, RPER, LPFR, and RPFR were 0.99, 0.94, 0.99, and 0.84, no proportional biases were detected. CONCLUSION: Reference values and relations to age and gender in chemotherapy-naïve cancer patients without cardiopulmonary disease are presented. The CZT camera provides reproducible estimates of peak emptying and filling rates.

Nuclear cardiology in the context of multimodality imaging to detect cardiac toxicity from cancer therapeutics: Established and emerging methods.

The complexity of cancer therapies has vastly expanded in the last decade, along with type and severity of cardiac toxicities associated with these treatments. Prevention of pre-clinical cardiotoxicity may improve cardiovascular outcomes and circumvent the decision to place life-sustaining chemotherapeutic agents on hold, making the early detection of cancer therapeutic related cardiac toxicity with non-invasive imaging essential to the care of these patients. There are several established methods of cardiac imaging in the areas of nuclear cardiology, echocardiography, computed tomography, and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging that are used to assess for cardiovascular toxicity of cancer treatments, with several methods under development. The following review will provide an overview of current and emerging imaging techniques in these areas.

Determination of left ventricular ejection fraction by gated 99mTc-MIBI G-SPECT in patients with takotsubo syndrome - comparison with echocardiography.

BACKGROUND: Echocardiography is the first exam to establish the myocardial function in patients with takotsubo syndrome (TTS). However, ECG-Gated Myocardial Single-Photon Emission Tomography (G-SPECT) also allows to calculate left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and can be useful in early stadium of TTS. AIM: To compare LVEF obtained from 99mTc-MIBI G-SPECT and echocardiography in patients with TTS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Study population:20 patients in medium age 77(62-89) with TTS were included. In all patients 99mTc-MIBI G-SPECT and echocardiography was performed on the same day. RESULTS: LVEF measured by G-SPECT and echocardiography ranged from 34 to 83% and 38 to 69%, respectively. The LVEF values for ECHO were significantly lower than for SPECT. The correlation between the LVEF was r = 0.76. The calculated correlation coefficient (r) for linear regression analysis was 0.64. The following equation shows the approximate interdependence of both LVEF calculations: LVEF GSPECT = 10.35 + 0.93 * LVEF Echo. CONCLUSIONS: G-SPECT tends to overerestimate LVEF compared to echocardiography so these imaging techniques should not be used interchangeably. Calculated equation should be used for comparison of LVEF.