[Stress urinary incontinence in female athletes: a taboo topic]. / Incontinence urinaire d'effort chez les sportives : un tabou.

STRESS URINARY INCONTINENCE IN FEMALE ATHLETES: A TABOO TOPIC. Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) has a high prevalence (between 20% and 81%) in sportswomen, all the more so if they practice a sport at risk for the perineal function, including jumping, running, strong abdominal contraction in combat sports, and if their practice is intensive and/or repeated with a dose effect. Making sportswomen aware of the importance of an educational prevention program is key, as the impact on performance in top-level sportswomen is real. In leisure activities, or in sports without repeated impact, regular activity is protective against SUI. This review examines the mechanisms of SUI, its prevalence in different sports, and prevention in young sportswomen.

INCONTINENCE URINAIRE D'EFFORT CHEZ LES SPORTIVES : UN TABOU. L'incontinence urinaire d'effort (IUE) a une prévalence qui reste élevée (de 20 % à 81 %) chez la sportive, d'autant plus qu'elle pratique un sport à risque pour la fonction périnéale ­ incluant saut, course, forte contraction abdominale comme dans les sports de combat ­ et que la pratique est intensive et/ou répétée. La sensibilisation des sportives à un programme éducatif de prévention est importante car l'impact sur la performance chez les sportives de haut niveau est réel. Dans une pratique de loisir ou d'un sport sans impacts répétés, une activité régulière est protectrice de l'IUE.

The effect of pregnancy pilates-assisted childbirth preparation training on urinary incontinence and birth outcomes: a randomized-controlled study.

PURPOSE: To examine the effect of pregnancy pilates-assisted birth preparation training on urinary incontinence (UI) including stress urinary incontinence (SUI) and urge urinary incontinence (UUI) during pregnancy, and the postpartum period and birth outcomes. METHOD: In this single-center, single-blind, randomized, controlled study, 126 participants who have 28-30 weeks of gestation and nulliparous were randomly assigned to receive either the (n = 63) or control group (n = 63). The study was carried out between March and August 2022. Pregnancy pilates intervention was applied twice in a week, a total of 8 weeks to pilates group. The control group was given routine obstetric and pregnancy care. A personal data form and the Michigan Incontinence Severity Index Form (M-ISI) were used as data collection tools. RESULTS: The mean weight gains of the experimental group during pregnancy were significantly lower than the control group. The experimental group had almost twice the rate of vaginal birth than those of the control group. The duration of labor mean score of experimental group was 5 h and 43 min less than the duration of labor of the control group (p < 0.001). After intervention, and postpartum period, the SUI and UUI severity of the experimental group was significantly lower than those of the control group (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pilates-assisted childbirth preparation training reduced the severity of UI including SUI and UUI symptoms during pregnancy and the early postpartum. In addition, pilates-assisted childbirth preparation training contributes to decrease in weight gain during pregnancy, the increase in the vaginal birth rate, and the shortening of the duration of labor. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT06185439.

Pelvic floor training to prevent stress urinary incontinence: A systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common disorder in women that has a negative impact on quality of life. Pregnancy and childbirth are considered important risk factors that directly affect the pelvic floor during pregnancy and labour, increasing the risk of pelvic floor dysfunction, with prevalence rates of SUI in the postpartum period ranging from 30 to 47% during the first 12 months. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) in the prevention of SUI in women during the antenatal and postnatal period by reviewing and evaluating the available scientific literature. METHODS: This is a systematic review, using only randomised controlled trials. We searched the databases Pubmed, Scopus, Cochrane and PEDro. We reviewed 7 prospective studies in English and Portuguese, which included 1,401 pregnant women of legal age who underwent PFMT to prevent SUI. RESULTS: The results allowed us to establish that PFMT is used for pelvic floor muscles and that this intervention, applied with the appropriate methodology, can prevent or cure SUI. CONCLUSIONS: The application of PFMT in an early stage of pregnancy has positive effects on the continence capacity after delivery.

Is Diastasis Recti Abdominis Rehabilitation after Childbirth Able to Prevent the Onset of Stress Urinary Incontinence? A Case-Control Study.

Background and Objectives: Pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) represent the first-line approach to pelvic floor dysfunctions (PFDs). Recently, studies have shown a synergy between the pelvic floor and abdominal muscles, hypothesizing that the anatomical and functional integrity of the abdominal wall plays a role in the prevention of pelvic floor disorders. Some studies have shown a significant correlation between diastasis recti abdominis (DRA) and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Nevertheless, the evidence reported in the literature is controversial and based on low-quality data. The aim of the study is to clarify whether DRA-specific abdominal rehabilitation is needed in women with SUI after childbirth. Materials and Methods: All consecutive women who had at least one delivery and complained of symptoms of pure SUI that were urodynamically proven were considered for the study. The group of symptomatic patients was compared with a series of consecutive women, identified during the same study period, without any symptoms of SUI. In both groups, we measured the inter-rectal distance (IRD) with an ultrasound scanner above and below the navel. Results: A total of 102 women eligible for the study group and 100 women who did not report any symptoms of SUI were enrolled. The inter-rectal distance above the umbilicus showed no significant difference between the two groups (2.12 ± 0.98 vs. 2.1 ± 0.77; p = 0.94). In contrast, the data from the sub-umbilical measurements showed a significant difference. Surprisingly, the asymptomatic group showed significantly greater (0.98 ± 0.9 vs. 1.33 ± 0.87 p-value: 0.009) IRD compared to the symptomatic group. Conclusions: The study shows that DRA is not a risk factor for SUI in women after childbirth. Therefore, specific abdominal wall rehabilitation after childbirth does not seem to be indicated.

Effect of pilates performed during pregnancy on postpartum stress urinary incontinence in primipara women.

INTRODUCTION: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) constitutes the majority of urinary incontinence (UI) cases that occur due to anatomical and physiological changes during pregnancy and postpartum period. The objcetive of this study was to evaluate the effect of pilates in preventing the occurrence of SUI in the postpartum period. METHODS: A retrospective case-control study was conducted in a private hospital. Participants consisted of patients who gave birth vaginally at the hospital and were admitted to the hospital for routine control at the postpartum 12th week. The women did pilates for two days a week from the 12th week of pregnancy until the birth were included in the case group. The women did not do pilates in the control group. Data was collected using the "Michigan Incontinence Symptom Index". To detect the presence of SUI, researchers asked women "Do you have urinary incontinence problems in your daily life?". STROBE research check-list was used for reporting the study. RESULTS: The study was completed with a total of 142 women consisting of 71 women in each group. Of the women, postpartum SUI occurred in 39.4%. The severity score of women who did pilates were found to be statistically significantly lower than those who did not do pilates. CONCLUSION: During pregnancy, women should be encouraged to do pilates about the prenatal period by health professionals.

C-Clamp Technique: A Retrospective Review of a Novel Technique to Prevent Bladder Injury in Retropubic Midurethral Slings.

IMPORTANCE: Synthetic mesh midurethral slings have become the criterion-standard treatment for stress urinary incontinence with urethral hypermobility in women. Iatrogenic bladder injury is a known risk of the procedure. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to show that a novel "C-clamp technique" can significantly reduce the risk of bladder and urethral injury at the time of bottom-up retropubic synthetic mesh midurethral sling placement. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective review of the electronic medical records using Current Procedural Terminology coding of a single surgeon who performed synthetic mesh midurethral slings. Medical records were reviewed for demographic and clinical data for all bottom-up retropubic synthetic mesh midurethral slings placed using a novel C-clamp technique. All operative reports were reviewed for bladder and urethral injury at the time of implantation of the synthetic mesh midurethral sling using the C-clamp technique. RESULTS: Two hundred one consecutive bottom-up retropubic synthetic mesh midurethral slings were placed using the C-clamp technique from April 2012 through June 2022. The average age was 51 years (29-86 years); the average weight was 82 kg (46 -139 kg); and the average body mass index was 31 kg/m2 (15-57 kg/m2). No patients sustained a bladder or urethral injury at the time of implantation of a retropubic synthetic mesh midurethral sling using the C-clamp technique. CONCLUSION: The novel C-clamp technique shows promise in eliminating the risk of iatrogenic bladder and urethral injury at the time of implanting a bottom-up retropubic synthetic mesh midurethral sling.

Does a Kegel Exercise Program Prior to Resistance Training Reduce the Risk of Stress Urinary Incontinence?

This comparative pre-post intervention study investigated the feasibility and benefits of Kegel exercises amongst incontinent women, prior to commencing resistance training (RT), to reduce the risk of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) compared to a group of women without prior Kegel exercises (KE). Incontinence severity index (ISI) score, pelvic floor muscle strength (PFMS), and body composition (such as body mass index (BMI), fat, and muscle mass), were obtained pre and post intervention. Results demonstrated that RT reduced SUI to a significantly greater extent only if preceded by KE as was observed in the Kegel exercise plus RT group (KE + RT) over time. The improvements in total ISI in both the KE + RT and RT groups were large (d = 1.50 and d = 1.17 respectively). A two-way ANOVA indicated a statistically significant improvement in average PFMS within the KE + RT group over time and between the two groups. A positive correlation was found between the average strength of pelvic floor muscles and SUI. Participants in KE + RT group demonstrated a significant increase in muscle mass (p ≤ 0.001) and concomitant reduction in fat mass (p = 0.018). This study determined a dedicated program of KE preceding a RT program improved average pelvic floor muscle strength and was effective in reducing SUI among incontinent women.

Collagen type â -loaded methacrylamide hyaluronic acid hydrogel microneedles alleviate stress urinary incontinence in mice: A novel treatment and prevention strategy.

Stress urinary incontinence (SUI), a chronic disease with widespread effects and an overall prevalence of up to 46% in adult women, is associated with a heavy disease burden. The clinical treatment for mild to moderate SUI is conservative, such as electrical stimulation and Kegel exercises, but the therapeutic effect is unsatisfactory, so it is imperative to seek new treatment modalities. Hydrogel microneedles (MNs) have been widely used in transdermal drug delivery because of their minimally invasive and highly biocompatible characteristics. Therefore, for the first time, we combined collagen type I with MN technology for the treatment and prevention of mild to moderate SUI.

[Overview of risk factors for stress urinary incontinence and strategies in its prevention and treatment].

Stress urinary incontinence is a medical problem that afflicts women worldwide. The causes can be mainly divided into 4 parts: increased abdominal pressure and chronic ischemia of pelvic floor muscles, endocrine changes, pelvic structural damages, inflammatory and consumptive states. The choice of prevention and treatment should also be based on a comprehensive assessment of individualized factors. Treatment techniques which are more minimally invasive or even non-invasive than surgery are currently a hot topic of research in the field of pelvic floor and urinary control, including laser and radiofrequency therapy, periurethral injection therapy, exogenous stem cell therapy and technology for activation of endogenous stem cells. They are expected to solve the clinical problem of stress urinary incontinence with a wider scope of application, lower trauma and fewer complications in the future.

Femistina versus Canephron as a prevention of urinary tract infections after midurethral sling surgery - Non-inferiority study.

OBJECTIVE: Urinary tract infection (UTI) is relatively common post-operative complication following midurethral sling placement (MUS), even in cases where intraoperative antibiotic prophylaxis was given. The primary aim of this study was to investigate the non-inferiority of Femistina as compared with Canephron in reducing symptomatic UTI in first six months following surgery. STUDY DESIGN: A sample size of 144 patients per group was established, to provide at least 90% power to demonstrate the non-inferiority of phytodrug Femistina versus Canephron as a prevention of post-MUS urinary tract infection. RESULTS: Women suffering from stress urinary incontinence and mixed urinary incontinence (MUI) with predominant SUI symptoms as confirmed by urodymamics (n = 320) were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to Femistina (40 mg, oral, twice daily for 20 days) or Canephron (3 × 5 ml taken orally-three times daily for 4 weeks). Both groups were homogenous for age, type of operation (only TOT outside-in) and severity of illness as indicated by ICIQ-SF questionnaire. We found that symptoms of UTI were significantly lower in patients receiving Femistina. During first 6 months after surgery UTI was confirmed in only 10 patients receiving Femistina (6,25%) when compared to 25 (15,63%) subjects receiving Canephron, p < 0.007. CONCLUSION: Femistina is not inferior to Canephron in preventing lower urinary tract infection after midurethral sling surgery.

Cost-effectiveness of prophylactic retropubic sling at the time of vaginal prolapse surgery.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic midurethral sling placement at the time of prolapse repair significantly reduces the risk for de novo stress urinary incontinence, but it is associated with some small but significant morbidities. Because there has not been a standardized approach to midurethral sling utilization, decision analysis provides a method to evaluate the cost and effectiveness associated with varying midurethral sling placement strategies in addressing the risk for de novo stress urinary incontinence. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the cost effectiveness of the 3 midurethral sling utilization strategies in treating de novo stress urinary incontinence 1 year after vaginal prolapse repair. The 3 approaches are (1) staged strategy in which prolapse repair is done without prophylactic midurethral sling placement, (2) universal sling placement in which prolapse repair is accompanied by prophylactic midurethral sling placement, and (3) selective sling placement in which prolapse repair is accompanied by prophylactic midurethral sling placement only in patients with a positive prolapse-reduced cough stress test. STUDY DESIGN: We created a decision analysis model to compare staged strategy, universal sling placement, and selective sling placement. We modeled probabilities of de novo stress urinary incontinence, patients choosing subsequent midurethral sling surgery for de novo stress urinary incontinence, and outcomes related to midurethral sling placement. De novo stress urinary incontinence rates were determined for each strategy from published data. The likelihood of patients with de novo stress urinary incontinence choosing midurethral sling surgery as their first-line treatment was also determined from the literature, and this scenario was only applied to patients without prophylactic midurethral sling placement at their index prolapse repair. Finally, outcomes related to midurethral sling placement, including recurrent or persistent stress urinary incontinence, voiding dysfunction requiring sling lysis, mesh exposure requiring excision, and de novo overactive bladder requiring medications, were all derived from publicly available data. All midurethral sling placement procedures were assumed to be retropubic. The costs for each procedure were obtained from the 2020 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Physician Fee Schedule or from previous literature with convertion to 2020 equivalent US dollar prices using the Consumer Price Index. The primary outcome was modeled as the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. We performed multiple 1-way sensitivity analyses to assess model robustness. RESULTS: The lowest-cost strategy was the staged strategy, which cost $1051.70 per patient, followed by $1093.75 for selective sling placement and $1125.54 for universal sling placement. The selective sling approach, however, had the highest health utility value; therefore, universal sling placement was dominated by selective sling placement because it is both less costly and more effective. When compared with the staged strategy, selective sling placement was cost effective with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $2664 per quality adjusted life-years, meeting the predetermined threshold. In multiple 1-way sensitivity analyses, the variable with the largest effect was the percentage of patients electing to undergo subsequent midurethral sling surgery for de novo stress urinary incontinence after the index surgery. Only when this proportion exceeded 62% did universal sling placement become the cost-effective option because selective sling placement surpassed the predetermined incremental cost-effectiveness ratio threshold and became dominated. CONCLUSION: Selective sling placement was the preferred and cost-effective strategy in treating de novo stress urinary incontinence 1 year after vaginal prolapse repair. Surgeons should counsel their patients preoperatively regarding the possibility of de novo stress urinary incontinence after prolapse repair, as well as on the benefits and risks of prophylactic midurethral sling placement surgery.

Trends in Performance of Anti-Incontinence Treatment at the Time of Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair From 2011 to 2019.

IMPORTANCE: There are no publications on national trends in performance of concomitant stress urinary incontinence (SUI) treatment with pelvic organ prolapse surgery over the past decade. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to describe trends in the performance and type of concomitant SUI treatment from 2011 to 2019. STUDY DESIGN: Surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse and coding for prolapse repair were identified from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. An autoregressive interrupted time series model estimated temporal trends in concomitant SUI treatment associated with 3 consequential events: U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) requirement for postmarketing studies from mesh manufacturers (January 2012), publication of the Outcomes following Vaginal Prolapse Repair and Midurethral Sling (OPUS) trial (June 2012), and the FDA's reclassification of vaginal mesh as a high-risk device (January 2016). RESULTS: There were 43,370 cases identified. The rate of concomitant SUI treatment decreased from 46.1% to 35.7% across the analysis period. No significant trend before postmarketing studies (-0.2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.8 to 1.1) was observed. After postmarketing studies, there was a downward deflection of -2.0% per quarter (95% CI, -3.6 to -0.4). After OPUS, we observed a flattening of the trend to -0.2% (95% CI, -0.8 to 0.4) that persisted after FDA reclassification. Sling procedures remained predominant (96.2% of SUI procedures) and performance of urethropexy decreased across the analysis period (-0.1%; 95% CI, -0.08 to -0.2). CONCLUSIONS: After the FDA's order for postmarketing studies, rates of concomitant SUI treatment significantly decreased. Rates stabilized after the OPUS trial at around 35% and did not subsequently change. Rates of nonmesh concomitant SUI treatment decreased during the analysis period.

Success of Concomitant Versus Interval Slings for Prevention and Treatment of Bothersome de Novo Stress Urinary Incontinence.

BACKGROUND: Despite large trials designed to guide management on whether to perform a prophylactic continence procedure at the time of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) repair, it remains unclear if a staged or interval approach confers advantages in treatment of bothersome stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in women without bothersome SUI before their POP repair. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare success of concomitant versus interval slings for the prevention/treatment of de novo bothersome SUI after POP repair. STUDY DESIGN: This multicenter retrospective cohort with prospective follow-up enrolled women with minimal or no SUI symptoms who underwent minimally invasive apical surgery for stage 2 or higher POP between 2011 and 2018 and had a concomitant sling placed at the time of POP surgery or an interval sling placed. Prospectively, all patients were administered the Urogenital Distress Inventory Short-Form 6, the Patient Global Impression of Improvement, and questions on reoperation/retreatment and complications. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients had concomitant slings, and 60 had interval slings. There were no differences in the proportion of patients who had intrinsic sphincter deficiency (22% vs 20%), although the concomitant sling group was more likely to have a positive cough stress test result (30% vs 8%, P = 0.006). The interval sling group was more likely to report "yes" to SUI symptoms on Urogenital Distress Inventory Short-Form 6 (3% vs 30%, P = 0.0006) and during their postoperative visit (0% vs 24%, P < 0.0001). There were no differences in surgical complications. CONCLUSIONS: Among women with minimal or no SUI symptoms undergoing prolapse repair, concomitant slings resulted in lower rates of bothersome SUI compared with similar women undergoing interval sling placement.

Surgical Removal of Midurethral Sling in Women Undergoing Surgery for Presumed Mesh-Related Complications: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether some, or all, of the mesh needs to be removed when a midurethral sling is removed for complications. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. MEDLINE, Cochrane, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases from January 1, 1996, through May 1, 2021, were searched for articles that met the eligibility criteria with total, partial, or a combination of anti-incontinence mesh removal. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: All study designs were included (N≥10), and a priori criteria were used for acceptance standards. Studies were extracted for demographics, operative outcomes, and adverse events. Meta-analysis was performed when possible. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: We double-screened 11,887 abstracts; 45 eligible and unique studies were identified. Thirty-five were single-group studies that evaluated partial mesh removal, five were single-group studies that evaluated total mesh removal, and five were studies that compared partial mesh removal with total mesh removal. All of the studies were retrospective in nature; there were no randomized controlled studies. Comparative studies demonstrated that partial mesh removal had lower rates of postoperative stress urinary incontinence (SUI) than total mesh removal (odds ratio 0.46, 95% CI 0.22-0.96). Single-group studies supported lower rates of postoperative SUI with partial mesh removal compared with total mesh removal (19.2% [95% CI 13.5-25.7] vs 48.7% [95% CI 31.2-66.4]). Both methods were similar with respect to associated pain, bladder outlet obstruction, mesh erosion or exposure, and lower urinary tract symptoms. Adverse events were infrequent. CONCLUSION: Postoperative SUI may be lower with partial mesh removal compared with total mesh removal. Other outcomes were similar regardless of the amount of mesh removed. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO, CRD 42018093099.

Effect of the App-Based Video Guidance on Prenatal Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Combined with Global Postural Re-education for Stress Urinary Incontinence Prevention: A Protocol for a Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: As the effectiveness on stress urinary incontinence (SUI) prevention of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT) for pregnant women has been inconclusive, we are planning to conduct a trial to evaluate a video program designed for prevention of SUI developed through combining PFMT with global postural reeducation (GPR). METHODS: As a randomized controlled trial, eligible participants will be randomized (1:1) into an exercise group and a control group to perform PFMT regularly following video guidance or with no intervention, respectively. The experimental stage will be from the 16th gestation week (GW) to the 12th month postpartum, with eight appointments at the 16th, 28th, 37th GW, delivery, the 6th week and the 3rd, 6th, and 12th month postpartum. Data will be collected regarding urinary leakage symptoms, the stress test, the modified Oxford Scale, pelvic floor ultrasound, perineal laceration classification at delivery, neonatal Apgar score, and questionnaires (PISQ-12, ICIQ-UI SF, I-QOL, OABSS). The primary outcome is the occurrence of the symptomatic SUI and positive stress test at the 6th week postpartum. DISCUSSION: This protocol is anticipated to evaluate the efficacy of the intervention via video app for the design of a future randomized control trial (RCT). TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial has been registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2000029618).

An In Vitro Study on Extracellular Vesicles From Adipose-Derived Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Protecting Stress Urinary Incontinence Through MicroRNA-93/F3 Axis.

Since the potential roles of extracellular vesicles secreted by adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ADSCs) are not well understood in collagen metabolism, the purpose of this research was to evaluate the effects of ADSCs-extracellular vesicles in stress urinary incontinence and the regulatory mechanism of delivered microRNA-93 (miR-93). ADSCs were isolated and cultured, and ADSCs-extracellular vesicles were extracted and identified. Stress urinary incontinence primary fibroblasts or satellite cells were treated with ADSCs-extracellular vesicles to detect the expression of Elastin, Collagen I, and Collagen III in fibroblasts and Pax7 and MyoD in satellite cells. After transfecting ADSCs with miR-93 mimics or inhibitors, extracellular vesicles were isolated and treated with stress urinary incontinence primary fibroblasts or satellite cells to observe cell function changes. The online prediction and luciferase activity assay confirmed the targeting relationship between miR-93 and coagulation factor III (F3). The rescue experiment verified the role of ADSCs-extracellular vesicles carrying miR-93 in stress urinary incontinence primary fibroblasts and satellite cells by targeting F3. ADSCs-extracellular vesicles treatment upregulated expression of Elastin, Collagen I, and Collagen III in stress urinary incontinence primary fibroblasts and expression of Pax7 and MyoD in stress urinary incontinence primary satellite cells. miR-93 expression was increased in stress urinary incontinence primary fibroblasts or satellite cells treated with ADSCs-extracellular vesicles. Extracellular vesicles secreted by ADSCs could deliver miR-93 to fibroblasts and then negatively regulate F3 expression; ADSCs-extracellular vesicles could reverse the effect of F3 on extracellular matrix remodeling in stress urinary incontinence fibroblasts. miR-93 expression was also increased in stress urinary incontinence primary satellite cells treated by ADSCs-extracellular vesicles. Extracellular vesicles secreted by ADSCs were delivered to satellite cells through miR-93, which directly targets F3 expression and upregulates Pax7 and MyoD expression in satellite cells. Our study indicates that miR-93 delivered by ADSCs-extracellular vesicles could regulate extracellular matrix remodeling of stress urinary incontinence fibroblasts and promote activation of stress urinary incontinence satellite cells through targeting F3.

Risk factors of postpartum stress urinary incontinence in primiparas: What should we care.

ABSTRACT: Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is a common clinical postpartum complication. It is necessary to explore the risk factors of postpartum SUI in primiparas to provide evidence support for preventing and reducing the occurrence of SUI.Primiparas who were delivered in our hospital from March 2019 to October 2020 were identified, the personal information and related treatment details of SUI and no-SUI primiparas were collected and analyzed. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify the risk factors of postpartum SUI in primiparas.A total of 612 primiparas were included, the incidence of SUI in primiparas was 32.03%. There were significant differences in the body mass index (BMI) before pregnancy, diabetes, abortion, delivery method, newborn's weight, epidural anesthesia, and duration of second stage of labor (all P < .05) between SUI and no-SUI group, and there were no significant differences in the age, BMI at admission, hypertension and hyperlipidemia SUI and no-SUI group (all P > .05). Logistic regression analyses indicated that BMI before pregnancy ≥24 kg/m2 (odds ratio [OR]: 2.109, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.042-4.394), diabetes (OR: 2.250, 95% CI: 1.891-3.544), abortion history (OR: 3.909, 95% CI: 1.187-5.739), vaginal delivery (OR: 2.262, 95% CI: 1.042-4.011), newborn's weight ≥3 kg (OR: 1.613, 95% CI: 1.095-2.316), epidural anesthesia (OR: 2.015, 95% CI: 1.226-3.372), and duration of second stage of labor ≥90 minutes (OR: 1.726, 95% CI: 1.084-2.147) were the risk factors of postpartum SUI in primiparas (all P < .05).The clinical incidence of SUI in primiparas is relatively high. In clinical practice, medical staff should conduct individualized early screening for those risk factors, and take prevention measures to reduce the occurrence of SUI.

The "Omega Sign": a novel HoLEP technique that improves continence outcomes after enucleation.

PURPOSE: Holmium-laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) has been a promising prostate surgery since its first introduction. Although there are 10 different HoLEP techniques in the literature, stress urinary incontinence (SUI) is common, because surgery is not performed based on the topographic anatomy of the external sphincter. We have developed a new HoLEP method named as the ''Omega Sign technique", which is based on the topographic anatomy of the external sphincter and could provide better continence outcomes by decreasing SUI rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The data of 400 patients who underwent HoLEP by a single surgeon between May 2016 and February 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into two groups, the first underwent the Gilling's technique (Group 1) and the second the novel ''Omega Sign'' technique (Group 2). Continence status and post-micturition symptoms (PMS) were evaluated according to the standards recommended by the international continence status. RESULTS: The data of 400 HoLEP procedures between May 2016 and February 2019 were analyzed, comparing Group 1 (n = 200) and Group 2(n = 200). SUI rate was significantly lower in Group 2 at the day of catheter removal and first month (p < 0.005). In addition, urge urinary incontinence (UUI) rate and PMS were significantly lower in Group 2. CONCLUSIONS: We could demonstrate improved continence results, comparable functional outcomes and equally minimal complications with the standard HoLEP technique. We believe that, the novel 'Omega sign' technique decreases SUI rates and will become standardised and easy to understand, thereby bringing and creating a shorter learning curve.

Outcomes of Prophylactic Mid-Urethral Sling at the Time of Robotic Sacrocolpopexy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of patients who underwent robotic sacrocolpopexy (RSC) with and without concomitant mid-urethral sling (MUS) placement for prophylaxis or treatment of preoperative stress urinary incontinence (SUI) METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all patients without prior incontinence procedures who underwent RSC with or without MUS placement by 3 surgeons (JA, LA, KE) at a single institution from 2012 to 2017 for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse. Patients had a MUS placed for either documented SUI or prophylaxis of SUI. We compared patient characteristics, operative details, postoperative outcomes, and complications between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 134 patients were identified. 58 (43%) had a MUS placed for documented SUI, 43 (32%) had prophylactic MUS, and 33 (25%) did not have a MUS placed. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the 3 groups. Patients who did not have a MUS placed had less estimated blood loss (76.4 vs 63.8 vs 36.9 mL, P = .018) but no difference in operative time (P = .408), length of stay (P = .427), or postoperative urinary retention (P = .988). A total of 4 (7%) patients who had a MUS placed for SUI had persistent SUI postoperatively. There were 2 (5%) patients who had a MUS placed prophylactically and 4 (12%) patients who did not have a MUS that developed de novo SUI. CONCLUSION: In this series, we demonstrate the safety and efficacy of prophylactic MUS placement at the time of RSC. Randomized studies evaluating concomitant prophylactic sling at time of robotic sacrocolpopexy could further guide preoperative patient counseling and decision-making.