Open abdomen treatment for complicated intra-abdominal infection patients with gastrointestinal fistula can reduce the mortality.

To evaluate the effect of the open abdomen (OA) and closed abdomen (CA) approaches for treating intestinal fistula with complicated intra-abdominal infection (IFWCIAI), and analyze the risk factors in OA treatment.IFWCIAI is associated with high mortality rates and healthcare costs, as well as longer postoperative hospital stay. However, OA treatment has also been linked with increased mortality and development of secondary intestinal fistula.A total of 195 IFWCIAI patients who were operated over a period of 7 years at our hospital were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were divided into the OA group (n = 112) and CA group (n = 83) accordingly, and the mortality rates, hospital costs, and hospital stay duration of both groups were compared. In addition, the risk factors in OA treatment were also analyzed.OA resulted in significantly lower mortality rates (9.8% vs 30.1%, P < .001) and hospital costs ($11721.40 ±â€Š$9368.86 vs $20365.36 ±â€Š$21789.06, P < .001) compared with the CA group. No incidences of secondary intestinal fistula was recorded and the duration of hospital stay was similar for both groups (P = .151). Delayed OA was an independent risk factor of death following OA treatment (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.316; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.068-1.623, P = .010), whereas early enteral nutrition (EN) exceeding 666.67 mL was a protective factor (HR = 0.996; 95% CI = 0.993-0.999, P = .018). In addition, Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Candida albicans were the main pathogens responsible for the death of patients after OA treatment.OA decreased mortality rates and hospital costs of IFWCIAI patients, and did not lead to any secondary fistulas. Early OA and EN also reduced mortality rates.

Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI) as empirical treatment comparing to ceftolozane/tazobactam and to meropenem for complicated intra-abdominal infection (cIAI).

Background: The rising incidence of resistance to currently available antibiotics among pathogens, particularly Gram-negative pathogens, in complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) has become a challenge for clinicians. Ceftazidime/avibactam (CAZ-AVI) is a fixed-dose antibiotic approved in Europe and the United States for treating (in combination with metronidazole) cIAI in adult hospitalised patients who have limited or no alternative treatment options. The approval was based on the results of RECLAIM, a Phase III, parallel-group, comparative study (RECLAIM 1 [NCT01499290] and RECLAIM 2 [NCT01500239]). The objective of our study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of CAZ-AVI plus metronidazole compared with 1) ceftolozane/tazobactam plus metronidazole and 2) meropenem, as an empiric treatment for the management of cIAI in Italy. Methods: A sequential, patient-level simulation model, with a 5-year time horizon and 3% annual discount rate (applied to both costs and health benefits), was developed using Microsoft Excel® to demonstrate the clinical course of the disease. The impact of resistant pathogens was included as an additional factor. Results: In the base-case analysis, the CAZ-AVI sequence (CAZ-AVI plus metronidazole followed by a colistin + tigecycline + high-dose meropenem combination after treatment failure), when compared to sequences for ceftolozane/tazobactam (ceftolozane/tazobactam plus metronidazole followed by colistin + tigecycline + high-dose meropenem after treatment failure) and meropenem (meropenem followed by colistin + tigecycline + high-dose meropenem after treatment failure), had better clinical outcomes with higher cure rates (93.04% vs. 91.52%; 92.98% vs. 90.24%, respectively), shorter hospital stays (∆ = - 0.38 and ∆ = - 1.24 days per patient, respectively), and higher quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained per patient (4.021 vs. 3.982; 4.019 vs. 3.960, respectively). The incremental cost effectiveness ratio in the CAZ-AVI sequence was €4099 and €15,574 per QALY gained versus each comparator sequence, respectively, well below the willingness-to-pay threshold of €30,000 per QALY accepted in Italy. Conclusions: The model results demonstrated that CAZ-AVI plus metronidazole could be a cost-effective alternative when compared with other antibiotic treatment options, as it is expected to provide better clinical benefits in hospitalised patients with cIAI in Italy.

Effect of multiple drug resistance on total medical costs among patients with intra-abdominal infections in China.

BACKGROUND: Multiple drug resistant (MDR) intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) are associated with notable direct and societal costs. As previous studies have not considered the impact of MDR on the total medical costs (TMCs) of IAIs, the present one examines this, as well as further estimates the additional costs at a national level. METHODS: This is a retrospective study. Firstly, we randomly selected a sample of 40% of all inpatients discharged between 2014 and 2015 from a teaching hospital, due to limits in budget and the large number of patients. Then, we manually selected 254 patients with IAIs according to the International Classification of Disease, 10th revision, using electronic medical records. Eventually, 101 patients with IAIs (64 MDR patients and 37 non-MDR patients) were included after excluding cases without laboratory test results, any pathogens detected, or antimicrobial resistant pathogens. Univariate analysis and a generalized linear model were applied to assess the parameters associated with TMCs. RESULTS: Compared to non-MDR patients, those with MDR pathogens were significantly associated with higher TMCs, higher antimicrobial costs, higher antimicrobial usage, larger number of pathogens, and longer length of stay and were more likely to have insurance and combination antimicrobial therapy. In addition, the average TMC among patients with MDR pathogens was ¥ 131801, which is ¥ 90201 higher than those without MDR pathogens. If our results are applied to the whole country, the sum of all attributable TMCs was ¥ 37 billion. The societal costs, furthermore, were ¥111 billion in 2015. CONCLUSION: Our results provide information that should lead to increased efforts to reduce inappropriate antimicrobial therapy, in order to decrease the emergence of MDR pathogens and to reduce their economic burden.

High excess costs of infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli in an endemic region.

The financial burden of antibiotic resistance is a serious concern worldwide. The aim of this study was to describe the excess costs associated with pneumonia, bacteraemia, surgical site infections and intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli in Medellín, Colombia, an endemic region for carbapenem resistance. A cohort study was conducted in a third-level hospital from 2014-2015. All patients with carbapenem-resistant and carbapenem-susceptible Gram-negative bacterial infections were included. Pharmaceutical, medical and surgical direct costs were described from the health system perspective. Excess costs were estimated from generalised linear models with gamma distribution and adjusted for variables that could affect the cost difference. A total of 218 patients were enrolled, 48 (22.0%) of whom were infected with carbapenem-resistant bacteria. IAIs were the most frequent. The adjusted total excess cost was US$3966 [95% confidence interval (CI) US$1684-6249], with a significantly higher cost for antibiotics, followed by hospital stay, laboratory tests and interconsultation. The highest excess cost was attributed mainly to the use of broad-spectrum antibiotics (US$1827, 95% CI US$1005-2648), followed by length of hospital stay (US$1015, 95% CI US$163-1867). The results of this study highlight the importance of designing antimicrobial stewardship programmes and infection control strategies in endemic regions to reduce the financial threat of antimicrobial resistance to health systems.

Impact of a Dynamic Microbiological Environment on the Clinical Efficacy of Ertapenem and Piperacillin/Tazobactam in the Treatment of Complicated Community-Acquired Intra-Abdominal Infection in Spain: A Cost-Consequence Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The microbial susceptibility of many antibiotics has been affected by prescribing patterns and their extensive use. The purpose of this evaluation was to assess how these changes could affect the initial efficacy of ertapenem and piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) acquired in the community and the potential consequences this may have in healthcare costs in Spain. METHODS: The Initial efficacy of ertapenem and piperacillin/tazobactam for patients with APACHE (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation) II scores <10 was extracted from a multicenter randomized study and were combined with the current microbial susceptibilities obtained from the SMART study, a multinational surveillance program. Country-specific pathogens distribution was extracted from a national study in patients with community-acquired IAI. The estimated effectiveness was used in a decision-analytic model to compare total costs between ertapenem and piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of complicated IAI. The model performs extensive one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses. RESULTS: The model suggested a savings of €209 (year 2012 values) per patient when complicated IAIs acquired in the community (APACHE II <10) were treated with ertapenem instead of piperacillin/tazobactam. One-way sensitivity analyses showed length of stay as the key driver parameter. Further analysis of this parameter and probabilistic sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of our evaluation, with a 58% likelihood of ertapenem being dominant. CONCLUSIONS: Ertapenem appears to be a cost-saving strategy over piperacillin/tazobactam for the treatment of patients with complicated IAIs acquired in the community in Spain.