Perioperative pancreaticoduodenectomy management strategy focusing on postoperative early drain colonization.

PURPOSE: Pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) is a highly invasive procedure. Intra-abdominal infections and pancreatic fistulas are strongly correlated complications. In the present study, we identified the risk factors for postoperative early drain colonization (POEDC) and established a perioperative management strategy. METHODS: A total of 205 patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy were included in the study. POEDC was defined as a positive drain fluid culture before postoperative day (POD) 4. We retrospectively investigated the correlation between POEDC, postoperative outcomes, and clinical factors. RESULTS: POEDC was observed in 26 patients (12.6%) with poor postoperative outcomes, including pancreatic fistulas (P < 0.001). A multivariate analysis demonstrated a correlation between these postoperative outcomes and the age (P = 0.002), body mass index (BMI) (P = 0.002), procalcitonin (PCT) level (P < 0.001), and drain amylase level on POD 1 (P = 0.032). Enterococcus was detected most frequently, being found in 15 patients. CONCLUSION: We observed a strong correlation between POEDC and poor postoperative outcomes. The BMI, age, and PCT and drain amylase level on POD 1 should be considered POEDC risk factors, with the need to propose an antibiotic perioperative strategy. POEDC control may represent the key to improving postoperative outcomes after PD.

Local antimicrobial delivery from temperature-responsive hydrogels reduces incidence of intra-abdominal infection in rats.

The objective of this study was to evaluate local antimicrobial delivery from temperature-responsive hydrogels for preventing infection in a rat model of intra-abdominal infection (IAI), and to determine whether delivery of tobramycin and vancomycin in combination is effective against IAI pathogens. Rats received intraperitoneal inoculation of E. coli, rat cecal contents, or cecal contents supplemented with E. coli, and received either no treatment, subcutaneous cefoxitin, or local delivery from hydrogels containing vancomycin, tobramycin, or both antimicrobials. Only the hydrogel with tobramycin and vancomycin significantly increased the infection free-rate compared to no treatment for all inocula (E. coli: 13/17, p < 0.0001; cecal contents: 11/17, p = 0.0013; cecal contents + E. coli: 15/19, p < 0.0001). Additionally, tobramycin and vancomycin displayed no synergy or antagonism against clinical isolates in vitro. Local delivery of tobramycin and vancomycin from temperature-responsive hydrogels provides broad coverage and high antimicrobial concentrations for several hours that may be effective for preventing IAIs.

Comparison of Intra-Abdominal Infection Risk Between Intracorporeal and Extracorporeal Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Right Hemicolectomy for Colon Cancer: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND: No previous study has compared the risk of surgical site infection (SSI) between intracorporeal anastomosis (IA) and extracorporeal anastomosis (EA) related to intra-abdominal infection in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the risk of SSI in IA and EA in this context. METHODS: From July 2014 to March 2018, 101 consecutive (median age, 73 years; male, 54) patients underwent laparoscopic right hemicolectomy for colon cancer. The IA and EA groups consisted of 51 and 50 cases, respectively. After either IA or EA, lavage was performed with 100 mL of saline in the area surrounding the anastomosis, and a sample was collected for bacterial culture. The product of the virulence score and dose of bacterial contamination score called the risk of SSI score was evaluated in both groups, and short-term outcomes in both groups were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in patient characteristics between the 2 groups. The frequency of organ/space SSI in the IA group was significantly higher than that in the EA group (7.8% vs 0%, P = .04). The risk of SSI score was significantly higher in the IA group than in the EA group (median, 9 vs 1, P < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with EA, IA in laparoscopic right hemicolectomy increased organ/space SSI rates, signifying intra-abdominal infection. We strongly recommend prevention of intra-abdominal infection when performing an IA.

Global Perspectives in Controversies Related to the Management of Intra-Abdominal Infections.

Background: Intra-abdominal infections (IAI) remain a substantial cause of worldwide morbidity, mortality, and healthcare cost burden. The World Surgical Infection Society (WSIS) was organized to help improve global outcomes from surgical infections. An initial project for the WSIS was to assess how surgeons treat common IAI in their regions. Methods: A 10-item questionnaire was distributed to members of four surgical societies dedicated to the study of surgical infections. Questions were related to common treatment decisions in the management of IAI, with the intention of identifying differences and potential controversies in patient care. Responses were analyzed by comparing percentages with 95% confidence intervals. Results: Globally, management was relatively similar for peritoneal irrigation (most commonly with saline or other crystalloid: China, 83.2% ± 5.8%; North America, 93.2% ± 6.4%; Europe, 85.7% ± 25.9%; and Latin America, 71.8% ± 6.9%). More varied responses were seen for the management of specific disease states; for instance, for cholangitis, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatic interventions were more common in North America (83.1% ± 9.6%) and less common in China (28.1% ± 7.0%). For appendiceal abscesses, percutaneous drainage and antibiotic treatment was most common in North America (93.2% ± 6.4%) and least common in Latin America (19.6% ± 6.1%). Additionally, the management of fascial and wound closures were different by region. Vacuum-assisted wound closure after fascial closure was utilized commonly in North America (32.2% ± 11.9%), Europe (28.6% ± 33.5%), and Latin America (27.6% ± 6.9%), however, was less commonly utilized in China (9.9% ± 4.4%), where there was higher rate of primary skin closure (85.7% ± 5.4%). Conclusion: Through its partnership with other surgical infection societies, the WSIS aims to develop evidence-based guidelines for more consistent pattern of IAI management globally. Delving further into why their practices differ may help improve worldwide outcomes.

Intraoperative surgical site infection control and prevention: a position paper and future addendum to WSES intra-abdominal infections guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSI) represent a considerable burden for healthcare systems. They are largely preventable and multiple interventions have been proposed over past years in an attempt to prevent SSI. We aim to provide a position paper on Operative Room (OR) prevention of SSI in patients presenting with intra-abdominal infection to be considered a future addendum to the well-known World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) Guidelines on the management of intra-abdominal infections. METHODS: The literature was searched for focused publications on SSI until March 2019. Critical analysis and grading of the literature has been performed by a working group of experts; the literature review and the statements were evaluated by a Steering Committee of the WSES. RESULTS: Wound protectors and antibacterial sutures seem to have effective roles to prevent SSI in intra-abdominal infections. The application of negative-pressure wound therapy in preventing SSI can be useful in reducing postoperative wound complications. It is important to pursue normothermia with the available resources in the intraoperative period to decrease SSI rate. The optimal knowledge of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics of antibiotics helps to decide when additional intraoperative antibiotic doses should be administered in patients with intra-abdominal infections undergoing emergency surgery to prevent SSI. CONCLUSIONS: The current position paper offers an extensive overview of the available evidence regarding surgical site infection control and prevention in patients having intra-abdominal infections.

A Step-Up Approach to Infected Abdominal Fluid Collections: Not Just for Pancreatitis.

Background: More than 145,500 abdominal abscesses occur annually in the U.S. Percutaneous catheter drainage (PCD) is the primary treatment for clinically significant intra-abdominal collections (IACs), but only approximately 90% of all IACs are treatable with PCD. This leaves a significant number of patients facing long courses of management, including multiple interventions. Minimally invasive debridement techniques are now employed regularly for the treatment of infected necrosis caused by acute pancreatitis. We describe the use of minimally invasive videoscopic debridement techniques employed as part of a "step-up" approach to resolve IACs of other etiologies that are unresponsive to PCD. Methods: Data of all patients undergoing this procedure at a tertiary referral academic center from 2015 to 2017 after failure of different PCD techniques were analyzed retrospectively. Results: Four men and two women, mean age 54.6 years (range 26-70 years), with refractory IACs (mean drainage time 91.3 days; mean number of drainage procedures 4.6) following a variety of surgical interventions and inflammatory conditions underwent either video-assisted retroperitoneal debridement or sinus tract endoscopic debridement with a rigid or flexible endoscope. Technical success was achieved in all cases, and clinical success was observed in five cases. No immediate procedural complications were detected. The mean hospital stay and post-procedure drainage times were 5.5 and 25.2 days, respectively. There were no recurrent IACs. Conclusion: Minimally invasive debridement techniques can safely resolve IACs refractory to standard PCD techniques. Employment of these techniques as part of a step-up approach may reduce the morbidity and duration of drainage for the thousands of patients treated annually who have refractory IACs, whatever their etiology.

The Greater Omentum-A Vibrant and Enigmatic Immunologic Organ Involved in Injury and Infection Resolution.

Once thought of as an inert fatty tissue present only to provide insulation for the peritoneal cavity, the omentum is currently recognized as a vibrant immunologic organ with a complex structure uniquely suited for defense against pathogens and injury. The omentum is a source of resident inflammatory and stem cells available to participate in the local control of infection, wound healing, and tissue regeneration. It is intimately connected with the systemic vasculature and communicates with the central nervous system and the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis. Furthermore, the omentum has the ability to transit the peritoneal cavity and sequester areas of inflammation and injury. It contains functional, immunologic units commonly referred to as "milky spots" that contribute to the organ's immune response. These milky spots are complex nodules consisting of macrophages and interspersed lymphocytes, which are gateways for the infiltration of inflammatory cells into the peritoneal cavity in response to infection and injury. The omentum contains far greater complexity than is currently conceptualized in clinical practice and investigations directed at unlocking its beneficial potential may reveal new mechanisms underlying its vital functions and the secondary impact of omentectomy for the staging and treatment of a variety of diseases.

What´s new in intraabdominal candidiasis in critically ill patients, a review.

A high prevalence of invasive candidiasis has been reported in recent years. Patients admitted to an intensive care unit are at the highest risk for invasive candidiasis, mostly due to the severity of their disease, immune-suppressive states, prolonged length of stay, broad-spectrum antibiotics, septic shock, and Candida colonization. Intraabdominal candidiasis comprises a range of clinical manifestations, from just the suspicion based on clinical scenario to fever, leukocytosis, increase in biomarkers to the isolation of the responsible microorganism. In critically ill patients with IAC prompt treatment and adequate source control remains the ultimate goal.

Epidemiology and outcomes of source control procedures in critically ill patients with intra-abdominal infection.

PURPOSE: To describe the characteristics and procedural outcomes of source control interventions among Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients with severe intra-abdominal-infection (IAI). MATERIAL AND METHODS: We identified consecutive patients with suspected IAI in whom a source control intervention had been performed in two tertiary ICUs in the Netherlands, and performed retrospective in-depth case reviews to evaluate procedure type, diagnostic yield, and adequacy of source control after 14 days. RESULTS: A total of 785 procedures were observed among 353 patients, with initial interventions involving 266 (75%) surgical versus 87 (25%) percutaneous approaches. Surgical index procedures typically involved IAI of (presumed) gastrointestinal origin (72%), whereas percutaneous index procedures were mostly performed for infections of the biliary tract/pancreas (50%) or peritoneal cavity (33%). Overall, 178 (50%) patients required multiple interventions (median 3 (IQR 2-4)). In a subgroup of 236 patients having their first procedure upon ICU admission, effective source control was ultimately achieved for 159 (67%) subjects. Persistence of organ failure was associated with inadequacy of source control at day 14, whereas trends in inflammatory markers were non-predictive. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of ICU patients with IAI require more than one intervention, yet successful source control is eventually achieved in a majority of cases.

Retrospective Analysis of Post-Operative Antibiotics in Complicated Appendicitis.

Background: There is no consensus regarding the ideal post-operative antibiotic strategy for surgically managed complicated appendicitis. The goal of this study was to investigate different antibiotic regimens used for this purpose at our institution and their association with post-operative outcomes. Methods: The 1,102 patients underwent appendectomy from 2012 to 2016. A detailed chart review was performed on the 188 with complicated appendicitis based on standardized definitions. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used to analyze post-operative antibiotic use and complications. Results: Of the 188 cases of complicated appendicitis, 143 (76%) were classified as perforated by the operative surgeon. These patients were significantly more likely to be started on antibiotics after appendectomy (83.9% versus 33.3%; p < 0.001) and have a greater length of stay (LOS) (p = 0.006). The development of a surgical site infection (SSI) was significantly associated with a clinical diagnosis of diabetes (p = 0.04); the presence of free fluid, abscess, or perforation on pre-operative imaging (p = 0.002, 0.039, and 0.012, respectively); and a decision by the surgeon to leave a drain (p = 0.001). On multiple logistic regression analysis adjusted for free fluid on pre-operative imaging and an intra-operative decision to leave a drain, patients receiving one day or three or more days of antibiotics had higher odds of developing an SSI than patients who did not receive any post-operative antibiotics. Conclusions: In this cohort, operative surgeons accurately identified patients with complicated appendicitis who did not require post-operative antibiotics. For patients deemed to require them, two days of treatment was associated with reduced odds of SSI compared with shorter or longer antibiotic courses. The optimal course of antibiotics remains to be identified, but these findings suggest that longer post-operative courses do not avert SSI compared with two days of antibiotics. A prospective trial could clarify the optimal duration and route of antibiotic therapy in the setting of surgical complicated appendicitis.

Effects of Time to Application of Negative Pressure Therapy on Abdominal Infections After Colonic Perforation.

BACKGROUND: Negative pressure therapy (NPT) seems to improve surgical outcomes in open abdomen (OA) management of severe intra-abdominal infections (IAIs). The aim of this study was to compare the effects of immediate vs. delayed application of NPT on outcomes in patients with IAIs after colonic perforation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analysed 38 patients who received NPT during OA management for IAI after colonic perforation. The endpoints were treatment duration, definitive fascial closure and in-hospital mortality. We subdivided patients according to the timing of NPT application: immediate (at the end of the first OA procedure) and delayed (at I-II revision, at III revision, and after III revision). RESULTS: NPT was applied immediately in 15 cases (39.5%) and was delayed in 23 (60.5%): 14 (36.8%) at I-II revision, 7 (18.4%) at III revision, and 2 (5.3%) after III revision. Immediate NPT application was associated with the best outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: NPT should be used as soon as possible in OA management for IAIs due to colonic perforation.

Efficacy of Antibiotic Agents after Spill of Bile and Gallstones during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Background: Perforation of the gallbladder during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) results in spill of bile or gallstones in the abdominal cavity. The aim of this study was to assess whether antibiotic agents after spill have an effect on post-operative and infectious complications. Patients and Methods: Operative reports and clinical data of patients undergoing LC between 2012 and 2016 in three hospitals were screened retrospectively for spill of bile and spill of gallstones. Included patients were divided into two groups: Patients who were treated with antibiotic agents (either prophylactic or a single administration during or directly post-operatively because of spill) and patients who did not receive any antibiotic agents. Patients were also categorized as to uncomplicated or complicated gallstone disease. Multi-variable logistic regression was used to assess risk factors for overall and infectious complications after spill. Results: Spill was reported in 14.7% (481 of 3,262). The infectious complication rate was 8.7% (42/481). Of 481 patients, 295 (61.3%) had uncomplicated gallstone disease and 239 (49.7%) received antibiotic treatment. Rates of infectious complications were comparable among patients receiving antibiotic agents or no antibiotic agents (8% vs. 9%, respectively; p = 0.779); also when analysis only included patients with complicated gallstone disease (11% vs. 10% respectively, p = 0.861). Spill of stones was the only independent risk factor associated with post-operative complications (odds ratio 2.55, 95% confidence interval 1.23-5.29, p = 0.012). Conclusion: Antibiotic agents (prophylaxis or intra-operative) after spill of bile and spill of gallstones do not reduce the risk of overall and infectious complications. Spill of stones is associated independently with post-operative complications. The present study sample may leave small differences in complication rates undetected.

Tactics to Prevent Intra-Abdominal Infections in General Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Abdominal infections following surgery have many severe consequences. Several effective, well-evaluated infection prevention and control processes exist to avoid these infections. METHODS: This manuscript reviews and provides supporting evidence for common management strategies useful to avoid postoperative abdominal infection. RESULTS: Prevention of abdominal infection begins with preparation of the environment using standard infection control practices. Peri-operative use of systemic antibiotics, an antibiotic bowel preparation in colorectal surgery, and effective antiseptic preparation of the surgical site all reduce infection rates. Peri-operative supplemental oxygenation, maintenance of core body temperature, and physiologic euglycemia will reduce both incisional and organ-space infections in the abdominal surgery patient. Strategic use of irrigation and drain placement may be useful in some circumstances. CONCLUSION: Specific methods of prevention are documented to reduce intra-abdominal infections. Prevention requires a multi-disciplinary team including the surgeon, anesthesiologist, and all operating room personnel.

Clinical significance of drain fluid culture after pancreaticoduodenectomy.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism of infected postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) following pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) is undefined. Drain amylase has been used to predict POPF, whereas little data are available about the value of drain fluid culture. The aim was to investigate the incidence, risk factors and association with surgical outcomes of positive drainage culture (PDC) after PD. METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis was conducted of prospectively collected data from patients who underwent PD between January 2005 and December 2015. Drain fluid samples were obtained for microbiological analysis after surgery. Risk factors for PDC were evaluated, and its influence on surgical outcomes was explored. RESULTS: Of 768 patients, 261 (34%) had PDC during the postoperative period. Among them, a total of 434 isolates were yielded. One hundred and seven (24.7%) were Gram-positive, 283 (65.2%) Gram-negative, and 44 (10.1%) fungi. Multivariate analysis revealed that body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2 , preoperative chemoradiation and intra-operative red blood cell transfusion were independent risk factors for PDC. PDC was associated with higher incidences of complications including POPF, major complications and reoperation, but with no correlation between the day of PDC and complications. BMI ≥25 kg/m2 , early PDC (≤3 days), main pancreatic duct <3 mm, and soft pancreas were revealed as independent predictors for POPF. There was a correlation between type of microorganisms and complications. CONCLUSION: Considering the correlation between PDC and postoperative complications, preventive measures are crucial to improve outcomes after PD. Whether antibiotic treatment for early PDC will alter the clinical course of POPF needs further evaluation.

Practice Patterns for the Use of Antibiotic Agents in Damage Control Laparotomy and Its Impact on Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to identify practice patterns associated with the use of antimicrobial agents with damage control laparotomy (DCL) and the relationship with post-operative intra-abdominal infection (IAI) rates. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was a retrospective review of trauma patients undergoing laparotomy at a Level 1 trauma center in 2010. Patients undergoing DCL versus those primarily closed (PCL) were compared for antimicrobial use (ABX) and its correlation with IAI rates (p < 0.05). Deaths with length of stay <5 days were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 121 patients were identified (28 DCL, 93 PCL). The DCL group was more severely injured (Injury Severity Score [ISS]: 31.4 ± 15 DCL vs. 18 ± 12.7 PCL, p < 0.001) with more small and large bowel injuries (SLBI), although not statistically significant (53.6% DCL vs. 35.5% PCL, p = 0.12). Practice patterns of ABX administration in terms of pre-operative (94.6% PCL vs. 69.2% DCL, p = 0.0012) and post-operative administration (PCL: 50.5% none, 21.5% one day, 28% long term >1 d; DCL: 21.4% none, 25.0% one day, 53.6% long term >1 day, p = 0.0130) were significant. Regression analyses demonstrated that neither ISS nor DCL was an independent predictor of infection, but pre-operative ABX was a negative predictor (odds ratio [OR] 0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.05-0.91, p = 0.037), while post-operative ABX (OR 6.7, 95%CI 1.33-33.8, p = 0.044) and SLBI (OR 3.45, CI 1.03-11.5, p = 0.02) were positive predictors of infection with an receiver operating characteristic of 0.81. CONCLUSION: Significant variations exist in the use of ABX in DCL and PCL. These variations may lead to deleterious results from both lack of initial pre-operative coverage and prolonged ABX use. The decrease in infection rates with pre-operative ABX yet significant increase with continued post-operative use even in the presence of SLBI suggests the need for a more standardized approach. With the increase in DCL and the open abdomen, more research is needed to clearly establish ABX protocols in this patient population.

Abdominal sepsis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize the recent evidence on the treatment of abdominal sepsis with a specific emphasis on the surgical treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: A multitude of surgical approaches towards abdominal sepsis are practised. Recent evidence shows that immediate closure of the abdomen has a better outcome. A short course of antibiotics has a similar effect as a long course of antibiotics in patients with intra-abdominal infection without severe sepsis. SUMMARY: Management of abdominal sepsis requires a multidisciplinary approach. Closing the abdomen permanently after source control and only reopening it in case of deterioration of the patient without other (percutaneous) options is the preferred strategy. There is no convincing evidence that damage control surgery is beneficial in patients with abdominal sepsis. If primary closure of the abdomen is impossible because of excessive visceral edema, delayed closure using negative pressure therapy with continuous mesh-mediated fascial traction shows the best results.

Probiotics and synbiotics for the prevention of postoperative infections following abdominal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative infections, particularly surgical site infections (SSIs), cause significant morbidity and mortality. Probiotics or synbiotics are a potential prevention strategy. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of probiotics/synbiotics for reducing postoperative infection risk following abdominal surgery. METHODS: We searched AMED, Central, CINAHL, Embase, Medline, and grey literature for randomized controlled trials of elective abdominal surgery patients administered probiotics or synbiotics compared to placebo or standard care. Primary outcome was SSIs. Secondary outcomes were adverse events, respiratory tract infections (RTIs), urinary tract infections (UTIs), combined infections, length of hospital stay, and mortality. Using random-effects meta-analyses, we estimated the relative risk (RR) or mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Tests were performed for heterogeneity, subgroup and sensitivity analyses were conducted, and the overall evidence quality was graded. FINDINGS: We identified 20 trials (N = 1374 participants) reporting postoperative infections. Probiotics/synbiotics reduced SSIs (RR: 0.63; 95% CI: 0.41-0.98; N = 15 studies), UTIs (RR: 0.29; 95% CI: 0.15-0.57; N = 11), and combined infections (RR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.35-0.70; N = 18). There was no difference between groups for adverse events (RR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.61-1.30; N = 6), RTIs (RR: 0.60; 95% CI: 0.36-1.00; N = 14), length of stay (MD: -1.19; 95% CI: -2.94 to 0.56; N = 12), or mortality (RR: 1.20; 95% CI: 0.58-2.48; N = 15). CONCLUSION: Our review suggests that probiotics/synbiotics reduce SSIs and UTIs from abdominal surgeries compared to placebo or standard of care, without evidence of safety risk. Overall study quality was low, owing mostly to imprecision (few patients and events, or wide CIs); thus larger multi-centered trials are needed to further assess the certainty in this estimate.

A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of preemptive antifungal therapy for the prevention of invasive candidiasis following gastrointestinal surgery for intra-abdominal infections.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing emergency gastrointestinal surgery for intra-abdominal infection are at risk of invasive candidiasis (IC) and candidates for preemptive antifungal therapy. METHODS: This exploratory, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial assessed a preemptive antifungal approach with micafungin (100 mg/d) in intensive care unit patients requiring surgery for intra-abdominal infection. Coprimary efficacy variables were the incidence of IC and the time from baseline to first IC in the full analysis set; an independent data review board confirmed IC. An exploratory biomarker analysis was performed using logistic regression. RESULTS: The full analysis set comprised 124 placebo- and 117 micafungin-treated patients. The incidence of IC was 8.9% for placebo and 11.1% for micafungin (difference, 2.24%; [95% confidence interval, -5.52 to 10.20]). There was no difference between the arms in median time to IC. The estimated odds ratio showed that patients with a positive (1,3)-ß-d-glucan (ßDG) result were 3.66 (95% confidence interval, 1.01-13.29) times more likely to have confirmed IC than those with a negative result. CONCLUSIONS: This study was unable to provide evidence that preemptive administration of an echinocandin was effective in preventing IC in high-risk surgical intensive care unit patients with intra-abdominal infections. This may have been because the drug was administered too late to prevent IC coupled with an overall low number of IC events. It does provide some support for using ßDG to identify patients at high risk of IC. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT01122368.

Examinations of ascites from prophylactic drains can predict intra-abdominal infections after living donor liver transplantation.

Studies suggest that prophylactic intra-abdominal drains are unnecessary for cadaveric liver transplantation using whole liver grafts because there is no benefit from drainage. However, no studies have investigated on the necessity of prophylactic drains after LDLT using split-liver grafts or reduced-liver grafts, which may present a high risk of post-transplant intra-abdominal infections. This retrospective study investigated whether the ascitic data on POD 5 after LDLT can predict intra-abdominal infections and on the post-transplant management of prophylactic drains. Between March 2008 and March 2013, 90 LDLTs were performed. We assessed the number of ascitic cells, biochemical examinations, and cultivation tests at POD1 and POD5. The incidence rates of post-transplant intra-abdominal infections were 24.4%. The multivariate analysis showed that left lobe and S2 monosegment grafts were a significant risk factor for intra-abdominal infections (p = 0.006). The patients with intra-abdominal infections had significantly higher acsitic LDH levels and the positive rate of ascitic culture at POD5 in comparison with patients without infections (p < 0.001 and p = 0.014, respectively). LDLT using left lobe and S2 monosegment grafts yields a high risk for post-transplant intra-abdominal infections, and ascitic LDH and cultivation tests at POD5 via prophylactic drains can predict intra-abdominal infections.

Patients Receiving Prebiotics and Probiotics Before Liver Transplantation Develop Fewer Infections Than Controls: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Among patients who have received liver transplants, infections increase morbidity and mortality and prolong hospital stays. Administration of antibiotics and surgical trauma create intestinal barrier dysfunction and microbial imbalances that allow enteric bacteria to translocate to the blood. Probiotics are believed to prevent bacterial translocation by stabilizing the intestinal barrier and stimulating proliferation of the intestinal epithelium, mucus secretion, and motility. We performed a meta-analysis to determine the effects of probiotics on infections in patients receiving liver transplants. METHODS: We searched PubMed and EMBASE for controlled trials that evaluated the effects of prebiotics and probiotics on infections in patients who underwent liver transplantation. Heterogeneity was analyzed by the Cochran Q statistic. Pooled Mantel-Haenszel relative risks were calculated with a fixed-effects model. RESULTS: We identified 4 controlled studies, comprising 246 participants (123 received probiotics, 123 served as controls), for inclusion in the meta-analysis. In these studies, the intervention groups received enteric nutrition and fiber (prebiotics) with probiotics, and the control groups received only enteric nutrition and fiber without probiotics. The infection rate was 7% in groups that received probiotics vs 35% in control groups (relative risk [RR], 0.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.11-0.41; P = .001). The number needed to treat to prevent 1 infection was 3.6. In subgroup analyses, only 2% of subjects in the probiotic groups developed urinary tract infections, compared with 16% of controls (RR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.04-0.47; P < .001); only 2% of subjects in the probiotic groups developed intra-abdominal infections, compared with 11% of controls (RR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.09-0.78; P = .02). Subjects receiving probiotics also had shorter stays in the hospital than controls (mean difference, 1.41 d; P < .001), as well as in the intensive care unit (mean difference, 1.41 d; P < .001), and duration of antibiotic use (mean difference, 3.89 d; P < .001). There was no difference in mortality between groups (RR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.21-4.47). There was no significant heterogeneity among studies. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the meta-analysis, giving patients a combination of probiotics and prebiotics before, or on the day of, liver transplantation reduces the rate of infection after surgery. These agents also reduced the amount of time spent in the hospital or intensive care unit and the duration of antibiotic use.