RESUMO
Akathisia is an underestimated but disturbing extrapyramidal side effect of antidepressants, which could reduce treatment compliance in mood disorders. This study aimed to investigate the frequency and risk factors in patients treated with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors/serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SSRI/SNRI). In addition, we assessed the impact of akathisia on the quality of life (QoL). Patients were aged between 18 and 75 years, receiving an SSRI/SNRI for 4-8 weeks, and were diagnosed with anxiety, depression, or obsessive-compulsive disorder. The Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale was used to assess the severity of the akathisia. QoL was evaluated using the Short Form 36 (SF-36) questionnaire. Akathisia was observed in 25% (50/198) of patients. Smokers and younger patients were more frequent among patients with akathisia. Physical functioning, physical role, vitality, and mental health domains of the SF-36 were reduced in the presence of akathisia. In conclusion, our results suggest that akathisia is not a rare side effect of SSRI/SNRI in patients with mood disorders, especially in smokers and younger patients. In addition, akathisia may reduce treatment compliance owing to a reduction in QoL. Further investigations are needed to confirm the risk factors, frequency, and consequences of treatment compliance for SSRI/SNRI-induced akathisia in patients with mood disorders.
Assuntos
Acatisia Induzida por Medicamentos , Qualidade de Vida , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/efeitos adversos , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/farmacologia , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/farmacologia , Adulto Jovem , Idoso , Adolescente , Fatores de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Transtorno Obsessivo-Compulsivo/tratamento farmacológico , Depressão/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Treatment-Resistant Depression (TRD) affects almost 30 % of patients with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD). Esketamine Nasal Spray (ESK-NS) has recently been approved for TRD in combination with a Serotonin Specific Reuptake Inhibitor/SSRI or a Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitor/SNRI. There is a lack of studies investigating the effectiveness and safety of ESK-NS in combination with other oral antidepressants. AIM: To assess the efficacy of Vortioxetine plus ESK-NS in mitigating depressive symptoms and emotional blunting, as well as its tolerability in TRD subjects, compared to the standard-of-care of SSRI/SNRI plus ESK-NS. METHODS: We conducted a post-hoc analysis of the REAL-ESK study. The study included twenty TRD patients, ten subjects taking Vortioxetine as the main oral antidepressant with ESK-NS, and ten subjects taking SSRI or SNRI with ESK-NS. Psychometric assessments (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale/MADRS, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale/BPRS) were conducted at baseline(T0), one month(T1), and three months after the treatment initiation(T2). RESULTS: The combination of Vortioxetine and ESK-NS was as effective as the standard-of-care in reducing depressive symptoms, with a higher effect size in reducing emotional blunting at T2. The safety and tolerability profile of the Vortioxetine+ESK-NS combination appeared to be better, with a lower rate of treatment-emergent adverse events. CONCLUSION: The combination of Vortioxetine and ESK-NS may be a valuable alternative to the standard-of-care SSRI/SNRI plus ESK-NS in TRD patients, particularly regarding the reduction of emotional blunting and potentially a better safety and tolerability profile. Further randomized controlled trials with larger sample sizes and prospective designs are needed to confirm these findings.
Assuntos
Administração Intranasal , Antidepressivos , Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Transtorno Depressivo Resistente a Tratamento , Quimioterapia Combinada , Ketamina , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina , Vortioxetina , Humanos , Vortioxetina/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ketamina/administração & dosagem , Ketamina/efeitos adversos , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/administração & dosagem , Transtorno Depressivo Resistente a Tratamento/tratamento farmacológico , Antidepressivos/administração & dosagem , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Escalas de Graduação Psiquiátrica , Resultado do Tratamento , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/farmacologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although vortioxetine demonstrates superior efficacy relative to placebo, there is still a lack of robust evidence to determine whether it offers advantages over commonly prescribed antidepressants for treating major depressive disorder (MDD). Thus, we aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing vortioxetine vs reuptake inhibitors in adults with MDD, analyzing two classes separately: (i) vortioxetine vs SSRIs and (ii) vortioxetine vs SNRIs. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases for randomized controlled trials comparing vortioxetine with SSRIs or SNRIs in adults with a primary diagnosis of MDD following standardized diagnostic criteria. Independent examiners conducted the literature search, study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment. Data were pooled in random-effects analyses. Statistical significance was considered at p<0.05. RESULTS: We included 6 trials (n=478) in the vortioxetine vs SSRIs analysis and 11 (n=4230) in the vortioxetine vs SNRIs analysis. There were no significant differences between vortioxetine and SSRIs/SNRIs in the probability of response, remission, overall dropouts, and dropout due to lack of efficacy. Vortioxetine provided a significantly lower risk of dropout due to adverse events compared with SNRIs, while not significant compared with SSRIs. Vortioxetine did not differ significantly from SNRIs regarding variation in MADRS score post-treatment. In general, vortioxetine exhibited a statistically lower risk of individual adverse events compared with SNRIs, while not significant compared with SSRIs. CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals that vortioxetine is as effective as SSRIs and SNRIs for treating MDD, with safety equivalent to SSRIs and superior to SNRIs.
Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina , Vortioxetina , Humanos , Vortioxetina/farmacologia , Vortioxetina/administração & dosagem , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/farmacologia , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/administração & dosagem , Adulto , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/farmacologia , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/administração & dosagem , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricosAssuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina , Humanos , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/farmacologia , Substituição de Medicamentos , Antidepressivos/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Captação Adrenérgica/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Captação Adrenérgica/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Captação Adrenérgica/administração & dosagemRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The understanding of mechanisms underlying non-response to antidepressants is limited. The latest data highlights the role of insulin resistance (IR) in major depressive disorder (MDD) pathophysiology, presentation, and treatment efficacy. This work aimed to assess IR in MDD and explore the relationships between IR, MDD presentation and non-response to selective serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRI). METHODS: 67 MDD individuals: 36 responsive (MDD T[+]), 31 non-responsive (MDD T[-]) to SNRI and 30 healthy controls were recruited. The treatment response criteria were: Clinical Global Impression Scale-Improvement score of 1 or 2 after ≥ 8 weeks of treatment. Participants were assessed by physician and self-report tools measuring depression, anhedonia, anxiety, bipolarity, sleep quality. Blood samples were collected to assess fasting glucose and insulin levels and calculate HOMA-IR (homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance). RESULTS: MDD T[-] vs. MDD T[+] had significantly higher body mass index, insulin levels, and HOMA-IR. MDD T[-] presented higher levels of depressed mood, appetite/weight changes, loss of interest, energy, overall depressive symptoms, and sleep impairment; some evaluations suggested higher anhedonia and anxiety in MDD T[-] vs. MDD T[+]. Insulin and IR were weakly but significantly correlated with the severity of psychomotor symptoms, energy level, thoughts of death/suicide, self-criticism, appetite/weight, depressed mood symptoms, sleep problems. IR was weakly but significantly correlated with anhedonia. CONCLUSION: IR appears to be linked to depressive symptoms characteristic of the "metabolic" MDD subtype, such as psychomotor changes, energy level, anhedonia, sleep problems, appetite/weight changes, state and trait anxiety, sleep quality, and non-response to SNRI.
Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Resistência à Insulina , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina , Humanos , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/fisiopatologia , Masculino , Feminino , Resistência à Insulina/fisiologia , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/farmacologia , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/uso terapêutico , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Antidepressivos/farmacologia , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/uso terapêutico , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/farmacologia , Insulina/sangue , Glicemia/metabolismo , Glicemia/efeitos dos fármacos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Ansiedade/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Parkinson's disease (PD) patients are frequently exposed to antidepressant medications (ADMs). Norepinephrine (NE) and serotonin (5HT) systems have a role in levodopa-induced dyskinesias (LID) pathophysiology. METHODS: We performed a longitudinal analysis on the PPMI cohort including drug-naïve PD patients, who are progressively exposed to dopamine replacement therapies (DRTs) to test the effect of ADM exposure on LID development by the 4th year of follow-up. RESULTS: LID prevalence (according to MDS UPDRS score 4.1 ≥ 1) was 16% (42/251); these patients were more likely women (p = 0.01), had higher motor (p < 0.001) and depression scores (p = 0.01) and lower putaminal DAT binding ratio (p = 0.01). LID were associated with the exposure time to L-DOPA (2.2 ± 1.07 vs 2.6 ± 0.9, p = 0.02) and to the exposure to ADMs, in particular to SNRI (4.8% vs 21.4%, p < 0.001). The latter persisted after correcting for significant covariates (e.g., disease duration, cognitive status, motor impairment, depression, dopaminergic denervation). A similar difference in LID prevalence in PD patients exposed vs non-exposed to SNRI was observed on matched data by the real-world TriNetX repository (22% vs 13%, p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: This study supports the presence of an effect of SNRI on LID priming in patients with early PD. Independent prospective cohort studies are warranted to further verify such association.
Assuntos
Antiparkinsonianos , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos , Levodopa , Doença de Parkinson , Humanos , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Masculino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Discinesia Induzida por Medicamentos/etiologia , Levodopa/efeitos adversos , Levodopa/farmacologia , Levodopa/administração & dosagem , Antiparkinsonianos/efeitos adversos , Antiparkinsonianos/administração & dosagem , Estudos Longitudinais , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/farmacologia , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/efeitos adversosRESUMO
This was a double-blind, randomized, phase 2 study of adults (18-64 years) with DSM-5 diagnosis of major depressive disorder (MDD), with moderate-to-severe episode severity (Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale [MADRS] ≥25) despite an adequate course with ongoing antidepressant for ≥6 weeks to ≤12 months. Following a double-blind placebo lead-in period (up to 3 weeks), participants were randomized to receive once daily aticaprant 10 mg or continue placebo, added to their ongoing treatment, for 6 weeks. Of 184 participants enrolled, 169 were included in safety analyses (aticaprant n = 85, placebo n = 84) and 166 in full intent-to-treat (fITT) efficacy analyses; 121 placebo lead-in non-responders (<30% reduction in MADRS total score) in fITT were included in enriched ITT (eITT) analyses. Improvement (least squares mean difference [upper limit 1-sided 80% CI] versus placebo) in MADRS total score at week 6 for aticaprant was significant versus placebo (eITT: -2.1 [-1.09], 1-sided p = 0.044; effect size (ES) 0.23; fITT -3.1 [2.21], 1-sided p = 0.002; ES 0.36). The between-group difference was larger among participants with Snaith-Hamilton Pleasure Scale (SHAPS) score greater/equal to versus less than baseline median SHAPS. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events reported for aticaprant (versus placebo) were headache (11.8% versus 7.1%), diarrhea (8.2% versus 2.4%), nasopharyngitis (5.9% versus 2.4%), and pruritus (5.9% versus 0%). One participant (1.2%) in each arm discontinued treatment due to an adverse event. In this study of participants with MDD and inadequate response to SSRI/SNRI, adjunctive treatment with aticaprant significantly reduced depressive symptoms versus placebo, without resulting in significant safety signals, supporting further investigation in larger trials.
Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Quimioterapia Combinada , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina , Humanos , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Método Duplo-Cego , Adulto , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto Jovem , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/administração & dosagem , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/efeitos adversos , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Adolescente , Receptores Opioides kappa/antagonistas & inibidores , Antidepressivos/administração & dosagem , Antidepressivos/efeitos adversos , Antidepressivos/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/administração & dosagem , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/efeitos adversos , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/farmacologia , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/uso terapêutico , Administração OralRESUMO
RATIONALE: Assessment of the bioeffect of serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRIs, including both selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs)) at the serotonin transporter (SERT) in patients and healthy controls can have important theoretical and clinical implications. OBJECTIVES: Bioeffect at SERT has been assessed by neuroimaging of brain SERT occupancy, through in vitro measurements of platelet serotonin (5-HT) uptake, and by measuring platelet 5-HT content pre- and post-initiation of SRI administration. Studies of platelet 5-HT content were reviewed in order to (1) determine the overall apparent bioeffect of SRIs; (2) compare bioeffect across types of SRIs; (3) compare the three approaches to assessing SRI bioeffect; and (4) determine how the findings might inform clinical practice. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of the published studies that measured platelet 5-HT content to assess SRI bioeffect at the platelet SERT. Studies using neuroimaging and in vitro platelet 5-HT uptake to assess SRI bioeffect were reviewed for comparison purposes. RESULTS: Clinical doses of SRIs typically resulted in 70-90% reductions in platelet 5-HT content. The observed bioeffect at the platelet SERT appeared similar among different SSRIs and SNRIs. The bioeffect estimations based on platelet 5-HT content were consistent with those obtained using neuroimaging to assess brain SERT occupancy and those based on the in vitro measurement of platelet 5-HT uptake. CONCLUSIONS: In general, excellent agreement was seen in the apparent SRI bioeffect (70-90% inhibition) among the platelet 5-HT content studies and across the three bioeffect approaches. Theoretical and practical clinical implications are discussed.
Assuntos
Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina , Humanos , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/farmacologia , Serotonina/farmacologia , Proteínas da Membrana Plasmática de Transporte de Serotonina , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/farmacologia , PlaquetasRESUMO
RATIONALE: It is known that both selective serotonin and serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SSRI, SNRI) are first-line drugs for the treatment of major depressive disorder. It has also been considered that both SSRI and SNRI can improve the symptoms of major depressive disorder by increasing the concentration of monoamine in the synaptic cleft based on the monoamine hypothesis. However, accumulating evidence has indicated that inflammation in the brain may be a key factor in the pathophysiological mechanisms that underlie the development of major depressive disorder. OBJECTIVES: It has been advocated that microglial cells may regulate the inflammatory response under pathological conditions such as major depressive disorder. In this study, we focused on whether duloxetine can ameliorate the inflammatory response induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in BV-2 microglial cells. RESULTS: Our results indicated that duloxetine significantly decreased the NO production induced by LPS. The increase in the protein expression level of iNOS induced by LPS was significantly decreased by treatment with duloxetine. Moreover, the increases in the protein expression levels of phosphorylated-IκBα, phosphorylated-Akt and Akt induced by LPS were also significantly decreased. Unexpectedly, the protein expression levels of other pro-inflammatory factors such as COX-2 and the phosphorylation ratios for various molecules including IκBα and Akt were not changed by treatment with duloxetine. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that duloxetine may have an anti-inflammatory effect, which could contribute to its therapeutic effectiveness for major depressive disorder.
Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina , Animais , Anti-Inflamatórios/farmacologia , Ciclo-Oxigenase 2/metabolismo , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/metabolismo , Cloridrato de Duloxetina/farmacologia , Lipopolissacarídeos/farmacologia , Camundongos , Microglia/metabolismo , Inibidor de NF-kappaB alfa/metabolismo , NF-kappa B/metabolismo , Óxido Nítrico/metabolismo , Óxido Nítrico Sintase Tipo II/metabolismo , Óxido Nítrico Sintase Tipo II/farmacologia , Norepinefrina/metabolismo , Proteínas Proto-Oncogênicas c-akt/metabolismo , Serotonina/metabolismo , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/farmacologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have suggested that microglial activation plays a key role in the pathogenesis of depression. In fact, neuroinflammation is associated with a phenotypic change of microglia, consisting of morphological differences, increased release of cytokines and oxidative stress products, which may contribute to the development and maintenance of depression. Antidepressants, including selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors and serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, have been shown to act on the immune and oxidative stress mechanisms commonly found to be disrupted in depression. Thus, the inhibition of microglial activation may be one of the mechanisms through which they exert an antidepressant action. AIM: This is the first review summarising in vitro and ex vivo studies investigating the effects of different classes of antidepressants on microglia activation, by examining cellular changes and/or via measuring the production of immune and/or oxidative stress signalling molecules, in microglia models of neuroinflammation with either lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or cytokines. A total of 23 studies were identified, 18 using LPS stimulation and 5 using cytokines stimulation. RESULTS: Overall, the studies show that antidepressants, such as selective serotonin re-uptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, monoamine oxidase inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants prevented microglial activation, including reduced microglial reactivity and decreased immune and oxidative stress products, in both models. However, specific antidepressants, such as bupropion and agomelatine did not prevent interferon-gamma (IFN-γ)-induced microglial activation; and for other antidepressants, including phenelzine, venlafaxine and sertraline, the results of different studies were inconsistent. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, results summarised in this review support the hypothesis that the action of at least certain classes of antidepressants may involve regulation of microglial activation, especially when in presence of increased levels of inflammation.
Assuntos
Antidepressivos/farmacologia , Depressão/tratamento farmacológico , Microglia/efeitos dos fármacos , Animais , Depressão/fisiopatologia , Humanos , Doenças Neuroinflamatórias/tratamento farmacológico , Doenças Neuroinflamatórias/fisiopatologia , Estresse Oxidativo/efeitos dos fármacos , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/farmacologia , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/farmacologiaRESUMO
A growing body of evidence suggests nigral iron accumulation plays an important role in the pathophysiology of Parkinson's disease (PD), contributing to dopaminergic neuron loss in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNc). Converging evidence suggests this accumulation might be related to, or increased by, serotonergic dysfunction, a common, often early feature of the disease. We investigated whether lower plasma serotonin in PD is associated with higher nigral iron. We obtained plasma samples from 97 PD patients and 89 controls and MRI scans from a sub-cohort (62 PD, 70 controls). We measured serotonin concentrations using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography and regional iron content using MRI-based quantitative susceptibility mapping. PD patients had lower plasma serotonin (p < 0.0001) and higher nigral iron content (SNc: p < 0.001) overall. Exclusively in PD, lower plasma serotonin was correlated with higher nigral iron (SNc: r(58) = - 0.501, p < 0.001). This correlation was significant even in patients newly diagnosed (< 1 year) and stronger in the SNc than any other region examined. This study reveals an early, linear association between low serotonin and higher nigral iron in PD patients, which is absent in controls. This is consistent with a serotonin-iron relationship in the disease process, warranting further studies to determine its cause and directionality.
Assuntos
Ferro/metabolismo , Doença de Parkinson/metabolismo , Serotonina/sangue , Substância Negra/metabolismo , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Doença de Parkinson/diagnóstico por imagem , Doença de Parkinson/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/farmacologia , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/metabolismo , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/farmacologia , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/uso terapêutico , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Substância Negra/diagnóstico por imagem , TempoRESUMO
Neurotoxicity is a frequent side effect of cisplatin (CisPt)-based anticancer therapy whose pathophysiology is largely vague. Here, we exploited C. elegans as a 3R-compliant in vivo model to elucidate molecular mechanisms contributing to CisPt-induced neuronal dysfunction. To this end, we monitored the impact of CisPt on various sensory functions as well as pharyngeal neurotransmission by recording electropharyngeograms (EPGs). CisPt neither affected food and odor sensation nor mechano-sensation, which involve dopaminergic and glutaminergic neurotransmission. However, CisPt reduced serotonin-regulated pharyngeal pumping activity independent of changes in the morphology of related neurons. CisPt-mediated alterations in EPGs were fully rescued by addition of serotonin (5-HT) (≤ 2 mM). Moreover, the CisPt-induced pharyngeal injury was prevented by co-incubation with the clinically approved serotonin re-uptake inhibitory drug duloxetine. A protective effect of 5-HT was also observed with respect to CisPt-mediated impairment of another 5-HT-dependent process, the egg laying activity. Importantly, CisPt-induced apoptosis in the gonad and learning disability were not influenced by 5-HT. Using different C. elegans mutants we found that CisPt-mediated (neuro)toxicity is independent of serotonin biosynthesis and re-uptake and likely involves serotonin-receptor subtype 7 (SER-7)-related functions. In conclusion, by measuring EPGs as a surrogate parameter of neuronal dysfunction, we provide first evidence that CisPt-induced neurotoxicity in C. elegans involves 5-HT-dependent neurotransmission and SER-7-mediated signaling mechanisms and can be prevented by the clinically approved antidepressant duloxetine. The data highlight the particular suitability of C. elegans as a 3R-conform in vivo model in molecular (neuro)toxicology and, moreover, for the pre-clinical identification of neuroprotective candidate drugs.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/toxicidade , Caenorhabditis elegans/efeitos dos fármacos , Cisplatino/toxicidade , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/metabolismo , Serotonina/metabolismo , Animais , Caenorhabditis elegans/metabolismo , Caenorhabditis elegans/fisiologia , Proteínas de Caenorhabditis elegans/genética , Cloridrato de Duloxetina/farmacologia , Feminino , Regulação da Expressão Gênica/efeitos dos fármacos , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/genética , Síndromes Neurotóxicas/fisiopatologia , Faringe/efeitos dos fármacos , Faringe/fisiologia , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/farmacologia , Transmissão Sináptica/efeitos dos fármacosRESUMO
Antidepressants exert their analgesic effects by inhibiting the reuptake of noradrenaline. Several antidepressants have been shown to block the sodium channels, which might contribute to their analgesic potency. The aim of this study was to determine whether serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) could produce antinociceptive effects via sodium channel blockade using the veratrine test in mice. Furthermore, the effects of these agents on the veratrine test were examined to elucidate the effects of several antidepressants and tramadol on sodium channels. The administration of duloxetine (10 mg/kg) and venlafaxine (30 mg/kg) suppressed cuff-induced mechanical allodynia; however, these antinociceptive effects were only partially suppressed by atipamezole. Furthermore, duloxetine and venlafaxine demonstrated antinociceptive effects via sodium channel blockade, as assayed by the veratrine test. In addition, several antidepressants, including amitriptyline, paroxetine and mirtazapine, reduced veratrine-induced nociception. In contrast, milnacipran and tramadol did not alter the veratrine-induced nociception. These results indicated that, in addition to the primary action of SNRIs on monoamine transporters, sodium channel blockade might be involved in the antinociceptive activities of duloxetine and venlafaxine, but not milnacipran.
Assuntos
Cloridrato de Duloxetina/farmacologia , Hiperalgesia/tratamento farmacológico , Neuralgia/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/farmacologia , Bloqueadores dos Canais de Sódio/farmacologia , Cloridrato de Venlafaxina/farmacologia , Animais , Comportamento Animal/efeitos dos fármacos , Cloridrato de Duloxetina/uso terapêutico , Hiperalgesia/metabolismo , Camundongos , Neuralgia/metabolismo , Medição da Dor , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/uso terapêutico , Bloqueadores dos Canais de Sódio/uso terapêutico , Cloridrato de Venlafaxina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
Cognitive impairment associated with chronic pain remains relatively poorly understood. Use of analgesic drugs and often present co-morbidities in patients can preclude conclusions of causative relationships between chronic pain and cognitive deficits. Here, the impact of pain resulting from spinal nerve ligation (SNL) injury in rats on short and long-term memory was assessed in the novel object recognition task. To understand if chronic pain seizes the limited cognitive resources that are available at any given time, task difficulty was varied by using either very different (ie, easy task) or similar (ie, difficult task) pairs of objects. Nerve-injured, male rats exhibited no short or long-term memory deficits under easy task conditions. However, unlike sham-operated controls, injured rats showed deficits in both short and long-term memory by failing to differentiate similar objects in the difficult task version. In SNL rats, duloxetine produced anti-allodynic effects and ameliorated long-term memory deficits in the difficult task suggesting benefits of pain relief possibly complemented by noradrenergic mediated cognitive enhancement. Together these data suggest chronic pain reversibly takes up a significant amount of limited cognitive resources, leaving sufficient available for easy, but not difficult, tasks. PERSPECTIVE: Memory deficits in a rat model of chronic pain were only seen when the cognitive load was high, ie, in a difficult task. Acute treatment with duloxetine was sufficient to relieve memory deficits, suggesting chronic pain induces memory deficits by seizing limited cognitive resources to the detriment of task-related stimuli.
Assuntos
Dor Crônica , Disfunção Cognitiva , Cloridrato de Duloxetina/farmacologia , Neuralgia , Desempenho Psicomotor , Reconhecimento Psicológico , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/farmacologia , Animais , Dor Crônica/complicações , Dor Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Crônica/fisiopatologia , Disfunção Cognitiva/tratamento farmacológico , Disfunção Cognitiva/etiologia , Disfunção Cognitiva/fisiopatologia , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Cloridrato de Duloxetina/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Neuralgia/complicações , Neuralgia/tratamento farmacológico , Neuralgia/fisiopatologia , Desempenho Psicomotor/efeitos dos fármacos , Desempenho Psicomotor/fisiologia , Ratos , Ratos Sprague-Dawley , Reconhecimento Psicológico/efeitos dos fármacos , Reconhecimento Psicológico/fisiologia , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/administração & dosagemRESUMO
Preclinical studies conducted to date suggest that depression could be elicited by the elevated expression of proinflammatory molecules: these play a key role in the mediation of neurochemical, neuroendocrine and behavioral changes. Thus, this study investigates the effect of chronic mild stress (CMS) and administration of venlafaxine (SSRI) on the expression and methylation status of new target inflammatory genes: TGFA, TGFB, IRF1, PTGS2 and IKBKB, in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PMBCs) and in selected brain structures of rats. Adult male Wistar rats were subjected to the CMS and further divided into matched subgroups to receive vehicle or venlafaxine. TaqMan gene expression assay and methylation-sensitive high-resolution melting (MS-HRM) were used to evaluate the expression of the genes and the methylation status of their promoters, respectively. Our results indicate that both CMS and chronic treatment with venlafaxine were associated with changes in expression of the studied genes and their promoter methylation status in PMBCs and the brain. Moreover, the effect of antidepressant administration clearly differed between brain structures. Summarizing, our results confirm at least a partial association between TGFA, TGFB, IRF1, PTGS2 and IKBKB and depressive disorders.
Assuntos
Encéfalo/metabolismo , Metilação de DNA , Leucócitos Mononucleares/metabolismo , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/farmacologia , Estresse Psicológico/genética , Transcriptoma , Cloridrato de Venlafaxina/farmacologia , Animais , Encéfalo/efeitos dos fármacos , Ciclo-Oxigenase 2/genética , Ciclo-Oxigenase 2/metabolismo , Quinase I-kappa B/genética , Quinase I-kappa B/metabolismo , Fator Regulador 1 de Interferon/genética , Fator Regulador 1 de Interferon/metabolismo , Leucócitos Mononucleares/efeitos dos fármacos , Masculino , Ratos , Ratos Wistar , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/uso terapêutico , Estresse Psicológico/tratamento farmacológico , Estresse Psicológico/metabolismo , Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta/genética , Fator de Crescimento Transformador beta/metabolismo , Cloridrato de Venlafaxina/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Inadequate treatment response and emotional blunting are common challenges with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors/serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs/SNRIs) for major depressive disorder (MDD). We investigated the effectiveness of vortioxetine on emotional blunting in patients with partial response to treatment with SSRIs/SNRIs. METHODS: Patients with MDD who experienced a partial response to SSRI/SNRI monotherapy at adequate dose for ≥6 weeks were switched to 8 weeks of vortioxetine treatment 10-20 mg/day (Study NCT03835715). Key inclusion criteria were Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) total score >21 and <29, current major depressive episode <12 months, Oxford Depression Questionnaire (ODQ) total score ≥50, and confirmation of emotional blunting by standardized screening question. Emotional blunting was assessed by ODQ and depressive symptoms by MADRS. Other outcomes assessed included motivation and energy (Motivation and Energy Inventory [MEI]), cognitive performance (Digit Symbol Substitution Test [DSST]), and overall functioning (Sheehan Disability Scale [SDS]). RESULTS: At week 8, patients (N=143) had improved by -29.8 points (p<0.0001) in ODQ total score; 50% reported no emotional blunting in response to standardized screening question. Significant improvements were observed on the DSST, MEI, and SDS at all time points assessed, and 47% of patients were in remission (MADRS total score ≤10) at week 8. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events included nausea, headache, dizziness, vomiting, and diarrhea. LIMITATIONS: No prospective phase before medication switch. CONCLUSION: Vortioxetine 10-20 mg effectively improved emotional blunting, overall functioning, motivation and energy, cognitive performance, and depressive symptoms in patients with MDD with partial response to SSRI/SNRI therapy and emotional blunting.
Assuntos
Transtorno Depressivo Maior , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina , Transtorno Depressivo Maior/tratamento farmacológico , Método Duplo-Cego , Humanos , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/farmacologia , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/farmacologia , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , VortioxetinaRESUMO
Preclinical studies suggest that stress-related disorders even prior gestation can cause long-term changes at the level of neurobehavioral adaptations. Therefore, it is critical to consider undergoing antidepressant therapy which could reverse the negative consequences in the offspring. Venlafaxine is widely used in clinical practice; however insufficient amount of well-controlled studies verified the safety of venlafaxine therapy during gestation and lactation. The aim of this work was to investigate the effects of perinatal venlafaxine therapy on selected neurobehavioral variables in mothers and their female offspring using a model of maternal adversity. Pre-gestational stressed and non-stressed Wistar rat dams were treated with either venlafaxine (10 mg/kg/day) or vehicle during pregnancy and lactation. We have shown that pre-gestational stress decreased the number of pups with a significant reduction in the number of males but not females. Furthermore, we found that offspring of stressed and treated mothers exhibited anxiogenic behavior in juvenile and adolescent age. However, during adulthood pre-gestational stress significantly increased anxiety-like behavior of female, with venlafaxine treatment normalizing the state to control levels. Additionally, we found that even maternal stress prior gestation can have long-term impact on adult number of hippocampal immature neurons of the female offspring. A number of questions related to the best treatment options for maternal depression still remains, however present data may provide greater insight into the possible outcomes associated with perinatal venlafaxine therapy.
Assuntos
Ansiedade/etiologia , Hipocampo/crescimento & desenvolvimento , Comportamento Materno/efeitos dos fármacos , Aprendizagem em Labirinto/efeitos dos fármacos , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/etiologia , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/farmacologia , Estresse Psicológico/tratamento farmacológico , Cloridrato de Venlafaxina/farmacologia , Animais , Comportamento Animal/efeitos dos fármacos , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Feminino , Lactação , Período Pós-Parto , Gravidez , Efeitos Tardios da Exposição Pré-Natal/induzido quimicamente , Ratos , Ratos Wistar , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/administração & dosagem , Fatores Sexuais , Cloridrato de Venlafaxina/administração & dosagemRESUMO
ABSTRACT: 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphy is used to differentiate Lewy body disease from other neurodegenerative disorders. We identified 2 cases with remarkably changed pulmonary uptake between 2 metaiodobenzylguanidine scintigraphies; pulmonary uptake was reduced when patients were taking selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor/serotonin noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor and preserved during the medication-naive or withdrawal state, suggesting that pulmonary uptake involves not only the noradrenaline transporter, but also the serotonin transporter. Pulmonary accumulation may affect the heart-to-mediastinum ratio as the region of interest on the planner image is usually placed on the heart and includes part of the lung. Therefore, we should pay attention to the medication state of patients with decreased pulmonary uptake.
Assuntos
3-Iodobenzilguanidina/metabolismo , Pulmão/efeitos dos fármacos , Pulmão/metabolismo , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/farmacologia , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/farmacologia , Transporte Biológico/efeitos dos fármacos , Feminino , Humanos , Pulmão/diagnóstico por imagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , CintilografiaRESUMO
RATIONALE: Depression has the topmost prevalence of all psychiatric diseases. It is characterized by a high recurrence rate, disability, and numerous and mostly unclear pathogenic mechanisms. Besides the monoamine or the neurotrophic hypothesis of depression, the inflammatory mechanism has begun to be supported by more and more evidence. At the same time, the current knowledge about the standard treatment of choice, the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) and serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), is expanding rapidly, adding more features to the initial ones. OBJECTIVES: This review summarizes the in vivo anti-inflammatory effects of SSRIs and SNRIs in the treatment of depression and outlines the particular mechanisms of these effects for each drug separately. In addition, we provide an overview of the inflammation-related theory of depression and the underlying mechanisms. RESULTS: SSRIs and SNRIs decrease the neuroinflammation through multiple mechanisms including the reduction of blood or tissue cytokines or regulating complex inflammatory pathways: nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB), inflammasomes, Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4), peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ). Also, SSRIs and SNRIs show these effects in association with an antidepressant action. CONCLUSIONS: SSRIs and SNRIs have an anti-neuroinflammatory role which might contribute the antidepressant effect.
Assuntos
Anti-Inflamatórios/farmacologia , Inibidores Seletivos de Recaptação de Serotonina/farmacologia , Inibidores da Recaptação de Serotonina e Norepinefrina/farmacologia , Animais , Depressão/tratamento farmacológico , Depressão/fisiopatologia , Modelos Animais de Doenças , Humanos , Inflamação/tratamento farmacológico , Inflamação/fisiopatologia , RoedoresRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Late-life depression is often associated with non-response or relapse following conventional antidepressant treatment. The pathophysiology of late-life depression likely involves a complex interplay between aging and depression, and may include abnormalities in cortical inhibition and plasticity. However, the extent to which these cortical processes are modifiable by antidepressant pharmacotherapy is unknown. METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with late-life depression received 12 weeks of treatment with open-label venlafaxine, a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (≤ 300 mg/d). We combined transcranial magnetic stimulation of the left motor cortex with electromyography recordings from the right hand to measure cortical inhibition using contralateral cortical silent period and paired-pulse short-interval intracortical inhibition paradigms; cortical facilitation using a paired-pulse intracortical facilitation paradigm; and short-term cortical plasticity using a paired associative stimulation paradigm. All measures were collected at baseline, 1 week into treatment (n = 23) and after approximately 12 weeks of treatment. RESULTS: Venlafaxine did not significantly alter cortical inhibition, facilitation or plasticity after 1 or 12 weeks of treatment. Improvements in depressive symptoms during treatment were not associated with changes in cortical physiology. LIMITATIONS: The results presented here are specific to the motor cortex. Future work should investigate whether these findings extend to cortical areas more closely associated with depression, such as the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that antidepressant treatment with venlafaxine does not exert meaningful changes in motor cortical inhibition or plasticity in late-life depression. The absence of changes in motor cortical physiology, alongside improvements in depressive symptoms, suggests that age-related changes may play a role in previously identified abnormalities in motor cortical processes in latelife depression, and that venlafaxine treatment does not target these abnormalities.