Intratympanic injection of MSC-derived small extracellular vesicles protects spiral ganglion neurons from degeneration.

Sensorineural hearing loss is one of the most prevalent sensory deficits. Spiral ganglion neurons (SGNs) exhibit very limited regeneration capacity and their degeneration leads to profound hearing loss. Mesenchymal stem cell-derived small extracellular vesicles (MSC-sEV) have been demonstrated to repair tissue damage in various degenerative diseases. However, the effects of MSC-sEV on SGN degeneration remain unclear. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of MSC-sEV for protection against ouabain-induced SGN degeneration. MSC-sEV were derived from rat bone marrow and their components related to neuron growth were determined by proteomic analysis. In primary culture SGNs, MSC-sEV significantly promoted neurite growth and growth cone development. The RNA-Seq analysis of SGNs showed that enriched pathways include neuron development and axon regeneration, consistent with proteomics. In ouabain induced SGN degeneration rat model, MSC-sEV administration via intratympanic injection significantly enhanced SGN survival and mitigated hearing loss. Furthermore, after ouabain treatment, SGNs displayed evident signs of apoptosis, including nuclei condensation and fragmentation, with numerous cells exhibiting TUNEL-positive. However, administration of MSC-sEV effectively decreased the number of TUNEL-positive cells and reduced caspase-3 activation. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate the potential of MSC-sEV in preventing SGN degeneration and promoting neural growth, suggesting intratympanic injection of MSC-sEV is a specific and efficient strategy for neural hearing loss.

Dexamethasone nanocrystals-embedded hydroxypropyl methylcellulose hydrogel increases cochlear delivery and attenuates hearing loss following intratympanic injection.

Herein, dexamethasone (DEX) nanocrystalline suspension (NS)-embedded hydrogel (NS-G) was constructed using a hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC) polymer to enhance cochlear delivery and attenuate hearing loss following intratympanic (IT) injection. Hydrophobic steroidal nanocrystals were prepared using a bead milling technique and incorporated into a polysaccharide hydrogel. The NS-G system with HPMC (average molecular weight, 86,000 g/mol; 15 mg/mL) was characterized as follows: rod-shaped drug crystalline; particle size <300 nm; and constant complex viscosity ≤1.17 Pa·s. Pulverization of the drug particles into submicron diameters enhanced drug dissolution, while the HPMC matrix increased the residence time in the middle ear cavity, exhibiting a controlled release profile. The IT NS-G system elicited markedly enhanced and prolonged drug delivery (> 9 h) to the cochlear tissue compared with that of DEX sodium phosphate (DEX-SP), a water-soluble prodrug. In mice with kanamycin- and furosemide-induced ototoxicity, NS-G markedly enhanced hearing preservation across all frequencies (8-32 kHz), as revealed by an auditory brainstem response test, compared with both saline and DEX-SP. Moreover, treatment with NS-G showed enhanced anti-inflammatory effects, as evidenced by decreased levels of inflammation-related cytokines. Therefore, the IT administration of DEX NS-loaded HPMC hydrogels is a promising strategy for treating hearing loss.

Intratympanic Gentamicin Injection for Endolymphatic Hydrops After Cochlear Implantation.

Endolymphatic hydrops has been documented as a possible complication of cochlear implantation; however, few studies have addressed its treatment. We describe the first case ever reported of delayed endolymphatic hydrops after a cochlear implant successfully treated with intratympanic gentamicin injection. A detailed discussion of this case with a focus on its management and outcomes will be provided in comparison with literature data. The intratympanic gentamicin injection has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment for symptomatic endolymphatic hydrops after cochlear implantation. We advocate further studies to validate this strategy as a promising alternative to surgical labyrinthectomy.

The effectiveness of intratympanic injections with methylPREDnisolon versus placebo in the treatment of vertigo attacks in MENière's disease (PREDMEN trial): a study protocol for a phase-3 multicentre, double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Intratympanic corticosteroids are commonly used in the treatment of Menière's disease (MD). However, few and small randomised controlled trials (RCT) on the effectiveness of intratympanic corticosteroids have been performed. A recent Cochrane review suggested that a well-conducted placebo-controlled RCT with a large study population is required to evaluate the effectiveness of the use of intratympanic corticosteroids in MD. The following protocol describes a phase-3 multicentre, double-blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled trial to compare the effectiveness of methylprednisolone (62.5 mg/mL) to a placebo (sodium chloride 0.9%). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We aim to recruit 148 patients with unilateral MD from six hospitals in the Netherlands. Patients will be randomly assigned to either the methylprednisolone or the placebo group. Two injections will be given, one at baseline and one after 2 weeks. Follow-up assessments will be done at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. The primary outcome will be the frequency of vertigo attacks. Attacks will be evaluated daily with the DizzyQuest app. Secondary outcomes include hearing loss, tinnitus, health-related quality of life, use of co-interventions and escape medication, (serious) adverse events and cost-effectiveness. These will be evaluated with audiometry and multiple commonly used, validated questionnaires. For the primary and secondary outcomes mixed model analysis, generalised estimating equation analysis and logistic regression analysis will be used. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study was submitted via the Clinical Trials Information System, reviewed and approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee Leiden The Hague Delft and the local institutional review board of each participating centre. All data will be presented ensuring the integrity and anonymity of patients. Results will be published in scientific journals and presented on (inter)national conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration and Results System, with the registration ID: NCT05851508.

Intratympanic injections of emulsion-like dispersions to augment cinnarizine amount in a healthy rabbit inner ear model.

Aim: To investigate eutectic liquid-based emulsion-like dispersions for intratympanic injections to augment cinnarizine permeability across round window membrane in a healthy rabbit inner ear model.Methods: Two-tier systematic optimization was used to get the injection formula. The drug concentrations in perilymph and plasma were analyzed via. Ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method after 30-, 60-, 90- and 120-min post intratympanic injection time points in rabbits.Results: A shear-thinning behavior, immediate drug release (∼98.80%, 10 min) and higher cell viability (>97.86%, 24 h) were observed in dispersions. The cinnarizine level of 8168.57 ± 1236.79 ng/ml was observed in perilymph at 30 min post intratympanic injection in rabbits.Conclusion: The emulsion-like dispersions can augment drug permeability through round window membrane.

[Box: see text].

Intratympanic Lidocaine as a Potent Remedy for Tinnitus in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Double-Blind, Randomized Clinical Trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluates intratympanic lidocaine's efficacy and safety for tinnitus relief in sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) patients. METHODS: In a double-blind randomized controlled trial, 100 SSNHL patients with unilateral tinnitus received either intratympanic lidocaine or saline plus usual care. Treatment impact was assessed at 1 and 3 months using the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory, subjective visual analog scale, pure-tone audiometry. RESULTS: The lidocaine group demonstrated significant tinnitus relief according to the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory and visual analog scale, without pure-tone audiometry improvement or serious adverse events throughout the study period. CONCLUSION: Intratympanic lidocaine provides a safe, efficacious treatment option for SSNHL tinnitus. Further studies should refine the dosage and delivery parameters because of SSNHL's heterogenous nature.

Endolymphatic duct blockage surgery vs. intratympanic steroids for treatment of refractory Ménière's disease.

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of the Endolymphatic duct blockage (EDB) and intratympanic methylprednisolone(ITMP) injection to control refractory Ménière's disease(MD) symptoms and evaluate their impact on hearing level. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study in a tertiary care center. METHODS: 36 received ITMP injection and 52 EDB. Mean outcome measures at 24 months included vertigo control, tinnitus, aural fullness and hearing level: pure-tone average (PTA), bone conduction average(BCA) and speech discrimination score(SDS). RESULTS: At 24 months postoperatively, 90.4% of the EDB group had complete control of vertigo and 43.4% of the ITMP group (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in tinnitus or aural fullness control (p = 0.34 and p 0.21 respectively). In each group, the drop in tinnitus and aural fullness frequency at 24 months were significant for EDB (p = 0.03; p < 0.001 respectively) and for ITMP group in tinnitus (p = 0.03) but not aural fullness (p = 0.063). At 24 months, PTA, BCA and SDS were significantly worst in the ITMP group when compared to preoperative levels (p = 0.038, p = 0.027, p = 0.016). PTA in the EDB group was stable with no difference compared to ITMP group (p = 0.48). BCA and SDS in the EDB group were stable and better than the ITMP group (p = 0.032; p = 0.036). In each group, vestibular paresis was not significantly different before (p = 0.06) and after treatment (p = 0.68). CONCLUSION: EDB is more effective than the ITMP for controlling the vertigo symptoms of Ménière's disease and in preserving hearing function. It is a novel surgical technique with promising results for a complete treatment of Ménière's disease. ITMP decreases the frequency and the severity of the symptoms but only control vertigo in 27.8% of cases.

Management of Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss (ISSNHL) Intratympanic Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) Versus Intratympanic Steroid Injections: A Cross-Sectional Study.

<b><br>Introduction:</b> Idiopathic sensorineural hearing loss of 30 decibels (dB) or more over at least three contiguous audiometric frequencies with an onset of less than 3 days is referred to as sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) and is known as an ENT (ear, nose, and throat) emergency. When a patient's hearing suddenly deteriorates, they become confused, anxious, and worried. One of the primary therapies for sudden sensorineural hearing loss is intratympanic steroids. Intratympanic injections of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) improve inner ear hair cells, which enhances hearing.</br> <b><br>Aim:</b> To show the safety and efficacy of intratympanic PRP injection in the management of ISSNHL in comparison with intratympanic steroid injection.</br> <b><br>Methods:</b> The study group was comprised of 100 patients who had experienced ISSNHL within 30 days with no retrocochlear pathology, as demonstrated by a negative MRI scan. 50 patients received 6 intratympanic steroid injections, while the remaining 50 patients received 2 intratympanic injections of PRP at a 1-week interval.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> A total of 39 patients with PRP injection noted an improvement in their hearing of 25 db after 2 weeks and of 30 db after 2 months, with improved speech discrimination of 26% after 2 weeks and of 28% after 2 months. 31 patients with intratympanic steroid injection noted an improvement in their hearing of 18 db after 2 weeks and of 22 db after 2 months, with improved speech discrimination of 21% after 2 weeks and of 24% after 2 months.</br> <b><br>Conclusions:</b> PRP appears safe and efficient for the treatment of ISSNHL, with a low cost and no systemic side effects, as with oral steroids. Therefore, such research should be continued.</br>.

Comparison of side effects of different steroids used in intratympanic injections.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the side effects of different steroids used in the intratympanic injections (IT). METHODS: One hundred and sixty patients diagnosed with sudden sensorineural hearing loss and undergoing IT were assigned to four groups based on the type or concentration of steroids administered (Group DM5: 5 mg/ml Dexamethasone sodium phosphate; Group DM10: 10 mg/ml Dexamethasone sodium phosphate; Group MP: 40 mg/ml Methylprednisolone sodium succinate; Group BM: 4 mg/ml Betamethasone sodium phosphate). Each group comprised 40 patients, and all participants received IT six times. The study assessed and compared the degrees and duration of pain, dizziness, and tympanic membrane damage following IT. Patients were asked to report the pain they felt using the numeric rating scale (NRS). RESULTS: NRS scores for pain after IT showed significant differences among the four groups (p < 0.001). The average NRS scores for pain in each group were as follows: Group DM5: 1.53 ± 1.04; Group DM10: 1.45 ± 1.30; Group MP: 4.33 ± 2.22; Group BM: 6.03 ± 1.46. The durations of pain after IT also exhibited significant differences among the four groups (p < 0.001), with the longest duration observed in Group MP at 31.93 ± 15.20 min. CONCLUSION: Different types of steroids could lead to varying degrees of pain when used in IT. Betamethasone could cause the most severe pain, and methylprednisolone could result in the longest duration of pain.

Intratympanic Gels for Inner Ear Disorders: A Scoping Review of Clinical Trials.

OBJECTIVE: Intratympanic injections are a safe, well tolerated procedure routinely performed by ENT's specialists. Intratympanic injections of gels have the potential to deliver therapeutics into the cochlea through the round window membrane prolonging the release of drugs in the inner ear compartment. Aim of the present review is to summarize clinical trials testing pharmacological treatments for inner ear pathologies through intratympanic gel formulations. DATA SOURCES: Online databases (Google scholar and PubMed) and registers (Clinicaltrials.gov and Euclinicaltrial) were used to identify clinical trials performed between 1990 and 2022. REVIEW METHODS: PRISMA criteria have been followed. Clinical trials testing gel formulations administered through local intratympanic injections and targeting inner ear disorders were included. All the reports were identified by the authors working in pairs sequentially selecting only studies respecting the inclusion criteria. RESULTS: A total of 45 clinical studies have been noticed; the gels for intratympanic injection are in the form of poloxamers or hyaluronic acid combinations; the trials found target different kind of inner ear disorders: acquired-stable SNHL, tinnitus, acute sudden SNHL, Meniere disease, cisplatin induced ototoxicity and hearing preservation in patients undergoing cochlear implant surgery. CONCLUSION: Few studies listed do not provide the specific kind of gel formulation used but only report the intratympanic delivery vehicle as "gel" or "thermogel". Multiple clinical studies have been targeting several forms of inner ear disorders by injecting different compounds through poloxamer and hyaluronic acid formulations. Larger and more advanced clinical stages are necessary to confirm the efficacy of these chemical compounds.

Improved Recovery after Vestibular Schwannoma Excision with Intratympanic Gentamicin Prehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE: Translabyrinthine excision of a vestibular schwannoma is associated with acute vestibular failure. Preoperative intratympanic gentamicin (ITG) injections can improve objective balance function after surgery but its clinical benefits remain to be established. METHODS: Adult patients undergoing translabyrinthine removal of a vestibular schwannoma between January 2014 and February 2018 underwent preoperative vestibular function testing. Patients were divided in to 3 groups, those with vestibular function (VF) who received ITG injections, those with VF but did not receive ITG and those with no VF. Groups were compared according to degree of vertigo, length of stay, time to unassisted mobilization, and postoperative anti-emetic consumption. RESULTS: Forty six patients had ITG injections (Group 1), 7 had residual VF but refused treatment (Group 2), 21 had no VF (Group 3). Group 1 had a significant improvement in vertigo over time whereas groups 2 and 3 did not. There was a statistically significant 70% decrease in time to independent mobilization between Group 1 and other groups and a 19% decrease in length of stay in Group 1 compared to other groups although this did not reach statistical significance. Two patients had injection-related complications. Group 1 used less anti-emetics than other groups but this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Preoperative intratympanic gentamicin injection with vestibular rehabilitation exercises is associated with less postoperative vertigo and earlier postoperative mobilization. There was reduced duration of hospitalization and decreased consumption of anti-emetic but not significantly so possibly because of low numbers of patients in the no treatment group. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 Laryngoscope, 134:3316-3322, 2024.

Preliminary Evidence for the Effects of Gentamicin on Vertical Semicircular Canals.

INTRODUCTION: Gentamicin is a vestibulotoxic antibiotic often used in patients with Ménière's disease for its vestibular ablative effects. Gentamicin's effect on the horizontal semicircular canal does not always correlate with the degree of vertigo control achieved by patients; its effect on the vertical semicircular canals remains unknown. We sought to examine the effect of intratympanic gentamicin on vertical semicircular canal function in patients with Ménière's disease using video head impulse testing. METHODS: A retrospective case series was carried out at a tertiary academic center. Patients with Ménière's disease who received ≥1 intratympanic gentamicin injection from 2019-2022 and had video head impulse testing performed were included. Outcomes of interest were vertical semicircular canal function following intratympanic gentamicin, correlations between vertical semicircular canal function and horizontal semicircular canal function, and residual symptoms following injection. RESULTS: Ten patients met inclusion criteria. Twenty percent had abnormal V-SCC function prior to any injection and 40% following the first injection. There was an association between abnormal vertical and horizontal semicircular canal function following the first intratympanic gentamicin injection, though the relationship did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.058). While patients with abnormal vertical semicircular canal function following the first injection were less likely to report ongoing vertigo attacks, the relationship was not statistically significant (p = 0.260). CONCLUSIONS: Intratympanic gentamicin leads to changes in vertical semicircular canal function in at least a proportion of patients with Ménière's disease. Further study is required to better assess correlations between vertical semicircular canal function and symptom control following intratympanic gentamicin.

Role of prior intratympanic gentamicin and corticosteroids therapy on speech understanding in patients with Menière's disease after cochlear implantation.

AIM: Intratympanic injection of corticosteroids (ITC) and gentamicin therapy (ITG) are widely used treatments for vertigo in Meniere's disease (MD). Even though studies show good results after cochlea implantation (CI) in MD patients when compared to non-MD groups, there is no indication on the effect of ITC and ITG prior to CI on hearing after CI. This study compares the post-operative hearing of CI patients with and without MD and patients who have received ITG or ITC prior to CI. METHODS: In a retrospective case control study, adult patients with MD who received CI from 2002 till 2021 were compared to a matched control group of CI patients without MD. Patients with prior ITC/ITG were extracted from MD group. Pre-operative audiological results were measured and trends across post-operative monosyllabic word recognition score at 65 decibels (WRS65CI) at switch-on, 3-6 months, 1 year and last yearly value were analyzed across all groups. RESULTS: 28 MD ears were compared with 33 control ears. From MD ears 9 had received ITG and 6 ITC prior to CI. WRS65CI increased significantly with time within MD and control groups, but no difference in WRS65CI was found between these 2 groups. ITG ears showed fluctuating WRS65CI after CI with no change across time, while ITC ears showed significant increase in trend of WRS65CI values across time. CONCLUSION: MD and non-MD patients showed comparable hearing results after CI. Prior ITC might positively influence hearing preservation after CI in MD patients whereas ITG group showed fluctuating hearing.

[Role of intratympanic glucocorticoid treatment in sudden hearing loss]. / Stellenwert der intratympanalen Glukokortikoidtherapie in der Behandlung des Hörsturzes.

Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) is one of the most common diseases in otolaryngology. Its etiology remains unknown. Furthermore, there is only a low level of evidence for the efficacy of established treatment modalities. In addition to systemic glucocorticoids, intratympanic corticosteroid treatment (ICT) has become increasingly important for treatment of ISSNHL. Different application strategies and treatment regimens have been described; however, uniform standards do not yet exist. ICT may be used for primary treatment as well as salvage therapy. Current data from meta-analyses show no benefit of intratympanic versus systemic primary therapy for sudden hearing loss (moderate evidence) but suggest a benefit of intratympanic secondary treatment over no treatment or placebo (high effect size, low evidence). Regarding combination of systemic and local glucocorticoid therapy in primary treatment of hearing loss, there may be a small benefit over systemic treatment alone (low effect size, low evidence).

Efficacy of high dose systemic versus combined (systemic and intratympanic) corticosteroid therapy in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss: A prospective randomized trial and risk factor analysis.

The pathophysiology and the proper treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL) are an ongoing subject of debate. Locally or systemic administered corticosteroids are the most accepted drugs of treatment in reference to ISSNHL (idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss), however, no strong evidence nor guidelines regarding their effectiveness yet exists. In our prospective, randomized, controlled trial 78 participants were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned based on the day of admission to two groups according to treatment: group SS (n = 43) received intravenous systemic methylprednisolone alone, and group CT (n = 35) received intratympanic dexamethasone + systemic methylprednisolone. The primary outcome was to compare the hearing outcomes between the treatment groups based on different, widely accepted categories (Siegel, Kanzaki, modified Siegel and PTA4 gain). In consideration of the secondary outcome, we examined the effect of the various risk factors on the hearing improvement. No differences were detected regarding hearing improvement between the two groups, based on any criteria [Siegel's criteria (p = 0.604); Kanzaki's criteria (p = 0.720); modified Siegel's criteria (p = 0.524) and PTA 4 gain (p = 0.569)]. However, several clinical factors such as vertigo (p = 0.039), or cardiovascular comorbidity (p = 0.02) and the severity of initial hearing loss (p = 0.033) were found to bear a significant impact upon the hearing outcome. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first randomized controlled trial comparing high dose systemic and combination corticosteroid therapy in ISSNHL patients. Our findings suggest coexisting cardiovascular comorbidity, vertigo and severity of the initial hearing loss may bear a significantly higher impact upon hearing improvement, than the additional intratympanic steroid administration. The presented trial was registered in the European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials Database (name: Combinated systemic and intratympanic steroid therapy in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss, No.: 2017-000658-20) and with the ethical approval of The National Institute of Pharmacy and Nutrition (OGYÉI) (protocol No.: 7621, on 2017.02.16.).

Efficacy of intratympanic steroid therapy for severe and profound sudden sensorineural hearing loss.

BACKGROUND: Intratympanic steroids (ITS) in treating sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) have become more widespread. AIM: This study investigates whether ITS treatment provides additional benefits when combined with systemic steroids (SS) in patients with severe and profound SSNHL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed with severe and profound SSNHL were divided into two groups: SS group and SS combined with ITS group. Pure-tone audiometry was performed before and three months after treatment completion. The pure-tone average (PTA), frequency-specific hearing gains, and average values were compared between the groups. RESULTS: The study included 57 patients (27 SS, 30 ITS), with a mean age of 50.09 ± 15.56. Before treatment: SS PTA 84.40 ± 15 dB HL, ITS 87.50 ± 9.38 dB HL (p = 0.36). After treatment: SS 62.2 ± 23.13 dB HL, ITS 65.17 ± 12.19 dB HL (p = 0.55). Average hearing gain: SS 22.19 ± 13.81 dB HL, ITS 22.33 ± 12.24 dB HL (p = 0.96). Frequency-specific gains were similar (p > 0.05). SS group: 12 slight improvement, 10 no improvement, 3 partial, 2 complete recovery. ITS group: 23 slight improvement, 6 no improvement, 1 partial. CONCLUSION: In our study, combining ITS with SS treatment did not provide additional benefits in treating severe and profound SSNHL.

Steroid Efficacy on Audiologic Recovery in Patients With Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss and Vestibular Schwannoma: A Retrospective Review.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to (i) estimate the incidence of vestibular schwannoma (VS) among patients in an integrated healthcare system who present for evaluation of sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) and (ii) evaluate the efficacy of empiric steroid therapy on audiologic recovery among SSNHL patients ultimately diagnosed with VS. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients presenting with SSNHL in 2021 at a multicenter integrated healthcare system serving over 4 million members. Patient demographics, audiometric data, VS diagnosis, therapeutic steroid intervention, and data regarding treatment response were recorded. A clinically significant audiometric improvement was defined as (i) an increase of 15% in word recognition score, (ii) a decrease of 15 dB in four-frequency pure-tone average (PTA) using frequencies of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz, or (iii) a PTA of <20 dB on follow-up audiogram. RESULTS: Six hundred fifty-eight patients were reviewed, of which 309 (56.0% male; mean, 57.5 years) met the inclusion criteria with audiometric data and magnetic resonance imaging data. Ten patients (70.0% male; mean, 51.3 years) were found to have VS. Of these, five patients received oral steroid therapy alone, and five had combination therapy (oral + intratympanic steroid injections). No patients received intratympanic steroid therapy alone. Median PTA improvement with steroid therapy was 3.1-dB hearing loss, and median word recognition score improvement was 16.5%. Six of 10 patients demonstrated clinically significant audiometric improvement with steroid therapy. CONCLUSION: This study represents the largest US-based study showcasing the prevalence of VS in patients originally presenting with SSNHL. It also reinforces previous findings that VS does not preclude trials of steroid therapy.

The impact of labyrinthine magnetic resonance signal alterations on the treatment of sudden sensory-neural hearing loss.

BACKGROUND: Sudden sensory-neural hearing loss (SSNHL), with positive findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), possibly related to labyrinthine hemorrhage, is a rare condition and difficult to be diagnosed. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the role of MRI in detecting labyrinthine signal changes and the impact of these changes on the prognosis of SSNHL after the intratympanic corticosteroid injection. METHODS: A prospective study was held between January and June 2022. We included patients who complained of SSNHL, either idiopathic (30 patients) or labyrinthine signal alterations (14 patients), as diagnosed by MRI performed 15 days after the SSNHL onset. In addition, all patients underwent a course of intratympanic prednisolone injections. RESULTS: 83.3% of the idiopathic group showed a complete or marked improvement after the intratympanic injection. Conversely, most cases of positive MR signal alterations (92.8%) had slight or poor improvement after the therapeutic course. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed that MRI imaging is essential for assessing any SSNHL case. It can diagnose labyrinthine hemorrhage, whose course and prognosis differ significantly from idiopathic SSNHL. SIGNIFICANCE: Intratympanic prednisolone injection was effective in managing idiopathic SSNHL. On the other hand, this therapeutic modality was ineffective in improving SSNHL associated with labyrinthine hemorrhage.

Discriminant Analysis of the Prognostic Factors for Hearing Outcomes in Patients with Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.

BACKGROUND: This study aims to determine and assess prognostic variables that might affect the hearing result in patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss following intratympanic steroid injection. METHODS: In total, 190 patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss received intratympanic steroid injection. Two hearing indices (recovery and nonrecovery) will be analyzed as dependent variables; patient's age, time period between the onset of hearing loss and treatment, initial level of hearing (hearing loss pre), type of audiogram curve (upsloping, downsloping, and flat), presence of vertigo, presence of tinnitus, and diabetes) will be analyzed as prognostic factor variables. RESULTS: Recovery was seen in 72% of the patients. Different preinjection audiogram curves and hearing grades had a significant effect on recovery, absence of vestibular symptoms and no diabetic history were noted to have a good prognosis. Delay in treatment by more than 30 days from the onset of hearing loss was associated with a worse prognosis. CONCLUSION: Idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss associated with late treatment plan more than 1 month, presence of vertigo, diabetes, and profound prehearing loss were negative prognostic factors. Whereas age, gender, and presence of tinnitus did not affect prognosis. More stable response was obtained when intratympanic steroids were added within 1 month after diagnosis, and the patient presented with mild or moderate hearing loss grade, flat or downsloping pure tone audiometery curve, and absence of vertigo and nondiabetic with significantly good results.