Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 120
Filtrar
3.
Bull Acad Natl Med ; 198(4-5): 905-16, 2014.
Artigo em Francês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26753415

RESUMO

Medicine is evolving every day in its operating procedures and the services offered to patients, emphasizing personalized medicine, safety and medical benefits. The individual patient is more than ever the hub of healthcare organization. Medical innovation is thus a public health priority. However it requires an accurate assessment of medical utility and risk-benefit ratios, and in-depth analysis of economic and organizational impacts. Ten years of experience in the Paris Biotech Santé company incubator has identified key actions for effective support of research projects and the success of innovative companies. Strong expertise is needed to prepare development plans, ensure compliance with regulatory requirements and obtain research funding. During its first decade, this incubator has created 87 innovative companies employing 1500 people, raised more than 90 million euros of funding, and reached a cumulative company value of 1200 million euros. Key factors of success have been identified, but an analysis of the causes of failure shows that operational adjustments are mandatory, particularly a strong commitment from medical experts, in order to promote access to new and useful products for patients while at the same time assessing their social impact.


Assuntos
Disciplinas das Ciências Biológicas/tendências , Biotecnologia/tendências , Instituições Privadas de Saúde/tendências , Invenções/tendências , Empresa de Pequeno Porte/tendências , Terapias em Estudo/tendências , Conta Bancária/legislação & jurisprudência , Conta Bancária/organização & administração , Disciplinas das Ciências Biológicas/economia , Disciplinas das Ciências Biológicas/organização & administração , Biotecnologia/economia , Biotecnologia/organização & administração , Comportamento Cooperativo , Setor de Assistência à Saúde , Instituições Privadas de Saúde/economia , Instituições Privadas de Saúde/legislação & jurisprudência , Instituições Privadas de Saúde/organização & administração , Humanos , Invenções/economia , Paris , Medicina de Precisão , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Apoio à Pesquisa como Assunto , Escolas para Profissionais de Saúde , Empresa de Pequeno Porte/economia , Empresa de Pequeno Porte/legislação & jurisprudência , Empresa de Pequeno Porte/organização & administração , Terapias em Estudo/economia , Universidades
4.
Eur J Neurol ; 18(8): 1094-7, 2011 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21749574

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic status is thought to have a significant influence on stroke incidence, risk factors and outcome. Its influence on acute stroke severity, stroke mechanisms, and acute recanalisation treatment is less known. METHODS: Over a 4-year period, all ischaemic stroke patients admitted within 24h were entered prospectively in a stroke registry. Data included insurance status, demographics, risk factors, time to hospital arrival, initial stroke severity (NIHSS), etiology, use of acute treatments, short-term outcome (modified Rankin Scale, mRS). Private insured patients (PI) were compared with basic insured patients (BI). RESULTS: Of 1062 consecutive acute ischaemic stroke patients, 203 had PI and 859 had BI. They were 585 men and 477 women. Both populations were similar in age, cardiovascular risk factors and preventive medications. The onset to admission time, thrombolysis rate, and stroke etiology according to TOAST classification were not different between PI and BI. Mean NIHSS at admission was significantly higher for BI. Good outcome (mRS≤2) at 7days and 3months was more frequent in PI than in BI. CONCLUSION: We found better outcome and lesser stroke severity on admission in patients with higher socioeconomic status in an acute stroke population. The reason for milder strokes in patients with better socioeconomic status in a universal health care system needs to be explained.


Assuntos
Instituições Privadas de Saúde/economia , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/economia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/economia , Programas Nacionais de Saúde/tendências , Reabilitação do Acidente Vascular Cerebral , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/economia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde/tendências , Instituições Privadas de Saúde/tendências , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/tendências , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/tendências , Hospitais Privados/economia , Hospitais Privados/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde/métodos , Estudos Prospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/mortalidade , Suíça/epidemiologia
7.
Health Policy ; 88(1): 141-51, 2008 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18442867

RESUMO

This paper analyzes the evolution and development of market conditions and government policies that have favored the emergence of proprietary medical facilities in China. Excess and differentiated demand for medical services, the existent profitability and supply of the investment capital in health care market, and favorable government policies have encouraged the entrance of proprietary facilities in health care market. The paper further analyzes why nonprofit health organizations are not an optimal organizational form in the current Chinese health care market. After discussing the strengths and weaknesses of proprietary ownership in health care market in China, the paper concludes with important managerial and policy suggestions.


Assuntos
Instituições Privadas de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Instituições Privadas de Saúde/tendências , China , Propriedade , Formulação de Políticas , Medicina Estatal
9.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14976992

RESUMO

Blue Cross and Blue Shield (BCBS) health plans, which insure nearly one in three Americans, historically have operated as local, nonprofit or mutual organizations. However, since the mid-1990s, BCBS plans increasingly have converted to for-profit companies and merged with Blue plans in other states. State insurance regulators, charged with weighing the costs and benefits of conversions and mergers to consumers, often wrestle with the legal complexities of these deals, according to Center for Studying Health System Change (HSC) site visits to 12 nationally representative communities. Although state regulatory scrutiny has slowed the pace of conversions recently, conversion activity is likely to accelerate again as the political and regulatory landscapes shift and plans adapt conversion strategies. The limited evidence available from HSC site visits and conversion proceedings suggests that conversions and mergers have had neither significant negative nor positive effects on consumers.


Assuntos
Planos de Seguro Blue Cross Blue Shield/organização & administração , Instituições Privadas de Saúde/economia , Instituições Associadas de Saúde/economia , Seguradoras/economia , Organizações sem Fins Lucrativos/economia , Relações Comunidade-Instituição , Competição Econômica , Eficiência Organizacional , Previsões , Instituições Privadas de Saúde/tendências , Instituições Associadas de Saúde/tendências , Política de Saúde/economia , Política de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Seguradoras/tendências , Organizações sem Fins Lucrativos/tendências , Propriedade , Viés de Seleção , Estados Unidos
10.
Hum Fertil (Camb) ; 6 Suppl 1: S25-7, 2003 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12869774

RESUMO

An estimated 85% of infertility treatment at the tertiary level in the UK currently is funded by the infertile couples themselves. Of the 15% of couples who receive NHS funding for assisted reproductive technology (ART), a sizeable proportion is provided by private clinics. If the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) decides that the National Health Service (NHS) should provide funding for an increased number of treatments, then it is unlikely that wholly NHS ART clinics will be able to provide the extra number of cycles required. Those private clinics in the UK that bid to provide treatment funded by the NHS through primary care trusts (PCT) generally provide a cost-effective service in a 'patient friendly' environment. The case is made in this article that ART clinics in the private sector that wish to bid for PCT contracts, should be allowed to compete on an equal basis with NHS or NHS-private combined clinics. PCTs awarding contracts should be wholly driven by good evidence of clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and the provision of a quality service to patients.


Assuntos
Administração de Caso/normas , Atenção à Saúde/tendências , Infertilidade/terapia , Setor Privado/tendências , Serviços de Saúde Reprodutiva/normas , Medicina Estatal/tendências , Adulto , Administração de Caso/economia , Administração de Caso/tendências , Proposta de Concorrência , Análise Custo-Benefício , Atenção à Saúde/economia , Feminino , Instituições Privadas de Saúde/economia , Instituições Privadas de Saúde/tendências , Humanos , Infertilidade/economia , Masculino , Satisfação do Paciente , Setor Privado/economia , Parcerias Público-Privadas , Serviços de Saúde Reprodutiva/economia , Técnicas de Reprodução Assistida , Medicina Estatal/economia , Reino Unido , Listas de Espera
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA