Comparison of prenatal anti-D titration testing by gel and tube methods: A review of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Antenatal titration testing is traditionally performed using a manual tube test. Tube testing has limitations; it is a manual, time-consuming method with wide interobserver variability. Gel-based testing is an attractive alternative because it is more precise and can be automated. This study's objective was to summarize the published literature that assessed the relationship between titrations performed by tube and gel for anti-D alloimmunized pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed. Articles were selected if research was original and compared at least five pairs of anti-D titration tests performed by gel and tube. Differences in the number of dilutions between gel and tube methods were compared overall by study and cell type using linear models. RESULTS: A total of 512 articles were identified; eight were included, and titer data from 384 tube and gel pairs were abstracted. The median anti-D titer in tube was 8 (range 0-2048) and by gel was 64 (range 0-4096). Anti-D gel titration results were 2.1 (95% CI; 1-3.3) additional dilutions greater than in tube. Most studies utilized double-dose reagent cells for testing. At a tube titer of 16, the sensitivity and specificity of gel titrations is maximal (91% and 94% respectively) at a gel titer of 64. CONCLUSION: Overall, titrations performed by gel were two dilutions higher than the corresponding tube titer. For titrations, double-dose reagent cells should be considered to standardize practice. A rigorous prospective study is needed to compare tube titrations with gel titrations using a standardized process.

Monocyte monolayer assay in pre-transfusion testing: A magic key in transfusing patients with recurrent bad cross-match due to alloimmunization.

BACKGROUND: The monocyte monolayer assay (MMA) is an in-vitro assay that can predict the outcome of blood transfusion of antigen positive units when serologically compatible blood is not available. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-four patients testing positive by the antibody screening test using gel agglutination were further examined by the alloantibody identification panel to determine alloantibody specificity. After determining and categorizing the antibodies, patients' samples were examined using the MMA to determine the clinical significance of the detected alloantibodies. We also tested 2 seeding methods (24-well cell culture plates versus 8-well chamber-slides) and 3 visualization/staining techniques (unstained phase contrast, Leishman and Giemsa staining). RESULTS: 35 out of the 54 cases (64.8%) had a monocyte index of >5% which is predictive of occurrence of hemolytic reaction after transfusion; 23 cases with antibodies known to be clinically significant [anti-C, anti-E, anti-c, anti-K, anti-Fy(a), anti Fy(b), anti-JK(b)], 2 with Anti-M specificity, 7 cases with autoantibodies and 3 cases with multiple antibodies. On the other hand, 19 out of the 54 (35.2%) cases included in the study showed a monocyte index of <5% which is predictive of absence of hemolytic reaction after transfusion. The 8-well chamber-slides were better than the 24-well culture plates, as the latter showed a lot of un-phagocytosed RBCs in the background. Also, Leishman staining was better than Giemsa staining with better and clearer differentiation between the RBCs, monocytes and phagocytic vacuoles. CONCLUSION: MMA can be used as a surrogate cross-match test for the selection of blood units in cases where antigen-negative blood units are not available.

The immunohistochemical expression of von Willebrand factor, T-cadherin, and Caveolin-1 is increased in kidney allograft biopsies with antibody-mediated injury.

BACKGROUND: There are only a few reports evaluating the applicability of endothelial-damage markers analysis by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in kidney allograft samples. This study analyzed the expression of Caveolin-1 (Cav), von Willebrand factor (Vwf), and T-cadherin (Cad) in kidney biopsies and their association with antibody-mediated injury. METHODS: In this retrospective study, 114 cases with antibody-mediated changes (Banff, 2020) and 72 with interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy were selected. IHC for Cav, Vwf and Cad was performed and evaluated according to their qualitative expression in peritubular capillaries. The cases were grouped according to the presence of microvascular inflammation (MVI), donor-specific antibodies (DSA), C4d positivity and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). A level of significance < 0.05 was adopted. RESULTS: Vwf expression was associated with MVI (p < 0.001), DSA (p = 0.016), C4d (p < 0.001) and AMR (p < 0.001), and was higher in DSA+/C4d+ cases despite MVI (p < 0.001). The expression of Cad correlated with MVI (p = 0.015), C4d (p = 0.005) and AMR (p = < 0.001). Cad was more expressed in chronic AMR compared with acute/active cases (p = 0.001). Cav expression was associated with MVI (p = 0.029) and AMR (p = 0.016) and was also higher in chronic AMR (p = 0.049). A combined score of Vwf and Cad was higher in AMR when compared with C4d without rejection and IF/TA cases (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Vwf, Cad and Cav expression shows association with antibody-mediated injury and may be helpful to support AMR diagnosis.

Peripheral Donor-specific Antibodies Are Associated With Histology and Cellular Subtypes in Protocol Liver Biopsies of Pediatric Recipients.

BACKGROUND: The cellular infiltrate in protocol liver biopsies (PB) following pediatric liver transplantation remains mostly uncharacterized, yet there is increasing concern about the role of inflammation and fibrosis in long-term liver allografts. We aimed to define cell types in PB and to analyze their relationship with donor-specific antibodies (DSA) and histological phenotype. METHODS: PB were performed at least 1 year after transplantation. We identified 4 phenotypes: normal, fibrosis, inflammation, inflammation with fibrosis. Cell types were counted after immunostaining for CD3, CD4, CD8, CD68, CD20, MUM1, and FoxP3. RESULTS: Forty-four patients underwent 1 PB between 2000 and 2015. Eleven percent (5/44) of PB displayed normal histology, 13.6% (6/44) fibrosis, 34.1% (15/44) inflammation, and 40.9% (18/44) inflammation and fibrosis. The main cell types in the portal tracts and lobules were CD3+ and CD68+ cells. Frequency of de novo DSA was 63% (27/44). The presence of CD8+ cells in the lobules was associated with fibrosis. Inflammation and fibrosis in PB were associated with the presence of circulating de novo DSA, number of de novo DSA, and C1q binding activity when compared to other phenotypes. CONCLUSIONS: T cells (CD3+) and macrophages (CD68+) were the most prevalent cell-types in PB. In the presence of inflammation, portal tracts were enriched in CD3+, CD20+ but displayed fewer CD68+. This coincided with the presence and number of de novo DSA. How these cellular and humoral actors interact is unclear, but peripheral DSA may be a marker of immune cellular activity in the seemingly quiescent allograft.

Red Blood Cell Alloantibody Titration - Does the Titration Method Matter?

BACKGROUND: Red blood cell (RBC) alloantibody titration is a quasi-quantitative method to assess antibody concentration and is considered a useful means of estimating maternal alloimmunization during pregnancy. Traditionally, titration is performed using conventional tube test (CTT). The gel microcolumn agglutination-based method (GMA) has been proven reliable for many immunohematology tests. Our study compared CTT with GMA of two different, commercially available GMA systems for RBC alloantibody titration. METHODS: Serum samples with significant RBC-alloantibodies were evaluated in our study. Each sample was titrated concurrently with CTT, with ID-DiaMed-GmbH, Cressier, Switzerland (GMA1), and with DG Gel Coombs Diagnostic Grifols, Passeig Fluvial, Spain (GMA2). RESULTS: One hundred thirty-seven titration tests including 50 anti-D, 25 anti-Kell, 10 anti-E, 9 anti-Jka, 8 anti-c, 5 anti-Cw, 5 anti-Fya, 7 anti-M, 6 anti-Kpa, 3 anti-Lua, 1 anti-e, 3 anti-G, and 2 anti-Cha were performed and evaluated. Samples tested by CTT versus GMA1 and GMA2 generated mostly equal or higher titers by GMAs. The results of both comparisons were in good agreement (W = 0.91, p < 0.0001, and W = 0.92, p < 0.0001, respectively). For all antibody specificities, the mean absolute difference in titers ranged from 1 - 3 for both GMA1 and GMA2 versus CTT. Samples tested by GMA1 vs. GMA2 were in almost perfect agreement (W = 0.95, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Although both GMAs were found slightly more sensitive than CTT for alloantibody titration, the differences were not significant and the agreement between all methods was very good, possibly indicating GMA as a suitable alternative to CTT in RBC antibody titration.

Characterization and refinement of monoclonal anti-human globulins that lack reactivity with human IgG4.

BACKGROUND: Anti-red blood cell (RBC) alloantibodies consisting of only the immunoglobulin G (IgG) 4 subtype are typically considered clinically insignificant. A US Food and Drug Administration-approved monoclonal anti-human globulin (16H8) is nonreactive with IgG4, which has been considered a benefit to avoid testing interference from IgG4. However, 16H8 also does not recognize two natural IgG3 variants (IgG3-03 and IgG3-13). Thus, 16H8 may miss clinically significant alloantibodies in some settings. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Novel mouse anti-human IgG hybridomas were generated and screened for reactivity with 32 human variants of anti-KEL1 across different IgG subtypes, as well as mutants to allow epitope mapping. Anti-IgG reactivity was determined using KEL1+ RBCs bound by each IgG variant as targets. Binding of anti-IgG was determined by flow cytometry. RESULTS: 16H8 recognized an epitope involving amino acid 419, which is glutamate in IgG4, IgG3-03, and IgG3-13, explaining the lack of 16H8 reactivity with these subtypes/isoallotypes. A new monoclonal antibody (PUMA8) was isolated that, like 16H8, was nonreactive with IgG4 but without blind spots for known variants of IgG1, IgG2, or IgG3. PUMA8 recognized an epitope containing arginine at position 355, which is glutamine in IgG4. However, a recently described new IgG4 variant with an arginine at position 355 results in PUMA8 reactivity. CONCLUSION: PUMA8 represents an alternative to 16H8 that avoids IgG4 but without blind spots for IgG3 variants. However, PUMA8 reacts with one recently described IgG4 variant. In addition to relevance to immunohematology, these studies highlight the importance of patient variation with regards to assay performance in an era of personalized medicine.

Comparison Between Phenotypic Bead Assay and Single Antigen Bead Assay for Determining Specificity of HLA Antibodies in Kidney Transplant Waiting List.

OBJECTIVES: The determination of unacceptable antigens in patients on kidney transplant waiting list is a critical laboratory investigation in sensitized patients. The Luminex single antigen bead (SAB) assay has high sensitivity and accuracy. However, several countries have not yet implemented SAB testing for waitlisted patients because of limited financial resources. In Thailand, specificities of HLA antibodies are identified by using a phenotypic bead assay. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the phenotypic bead assay for determining HLA antibody specificities when compared with the SAB assay. METHODS: A total of 254 sera from patients awaiting kidney transplantation were included. Of 254 sera, 206 and 171 were positive for HLA class I and II antibodies, respectively. Antibody specificities of sera that were tested with both phenotypic and SAB assay were analyzed. The performances of the phenotypic bead assay were compared with those of the SAB assay as the gold standard by using estimation of pooling sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the phenotypic bead assay for determining HLA class I antibodies was 53.9%, 93.0%, and 78.1%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the phenotypic bead assay for determining HLA class II antibodies were 57.3%, 94.9%, and 81.4% respectively. CONCLUSION: In waitlisted kidney transplant patients, the phenotypic bead assay had high specificity and moderate accuracy when compared with the SAB assay. However, the low sensitivity of the test suggests that the use of the phenotypic assay for determining HLA specificities should be applied with caution in sensitized patients.

Caveats of HLA antibody detection by solid-phase assays.

Solid-phase assays for human leukocyte antigens (HLA) antibody detection have clearly revolutionized the field of HLA diagnostics and transplantation. The key advantages are a high sensitivity and specificity for the detection of HLA antibodies compared with cell-based assays, as well as the potential for standardization. Solid-phase assays enabled the broad introduction of tools such as "virtual crossmatching" and "calculated panel reactive antibodies," which are essential components in many organ allocation systems, kidney-paired donation programs, and center-specific immunological risk stratification procedures. The most advanced solid-phase assays are the so-called single antigen beads (SAB). They are available now for more than 15 years, and the transplant community embraced their significant advantages. However, SAB analysis and interpretation is complex and many pitfalls have to be considered. In this review, we will discuss problems, limitations, and challenges using SAB. Furthermore, we express our wishes for the improvements of SAB as well as their future use for immunological assessment and research purposes.

DSA Are Associated With More Graft Injury, More Fibrosis, and Upregulation of Rejection-associated Transcripts in Subclinical Rejection.

BACKGROUND: Subclinical T cell-mediated rejection (subTCMR) is commonly found after liver transplantation and has a good short-term prognosis, even when it is left untreated. Donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are putatively associated with a worse prognosis for recipient and graft after liver transplantation. METHODS: To assess the immune regulation in subTCMR grafts, gene expression of 93 transcripts for graft injury, tolerance, and immune regulation was analyzed in 77 biopsies with "no histologic rejection" (NHR; n = 25), "clinical TCMR" (cTMCR; n = 16), and subTCMR (n = 36). In addition, all available subTCMR biopsies (n = 71) were tested for DSA with bead assays. RESULTS: SubTCMR showed heterogeneous and intermediate expression profiles of transcripts that were upregulated in cTCMR. Graft gene expression suggested a lower activation of effector lymphocytes and a higher activation of regulatory T cells in grafts with subTCMR compared to cTCMR. DSA positivity in subTCMR was associated with histological evidence of more severe graft inflammation and fibrosis. This more severe DSA+ associated graft injury in subTCMR was converged with an upregulation of cTCMR-associated transcripts. In nonsupervised analysis, DSA positive subTCMR mostly clustered together with cTCMR, while DSA negative subTCMR clustered together with NHR. CONCLUSIONS: T cell-mediated rejection seems to form a continuum of alloimmune activation. Although subTCMR exhibited less expression of TCMR-associated transcript, DSA positivity in subTCMR was associated with an upregulation of rejection-associated transcripts. The identification of DSA positive subclinical rejection might help to define patients with more inflammation in the graft and development of fibrosis.

HLA antibodies in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

The negative impact of donor specific HLA alloantibodies in solid organ transplantation is well known and understood within the histocompatibility and immunogenetics community. However the influence of donor-specific antibodies in the outcome of haematopoietic stem cell transplantation is less well regarded. As donor choices have evolved from HLA matched siblings and extremely well matched unrelated donors to mismatched cord blood and haplo-identical-related donors, we are now identifying more patients with antibodies reactive against their donor mismatches. The clinical significance of the antibodies that can be detected has not yet been fully elucidated.

Pretransplant Kinetics of Anti-HLA Antibodies in Patients on the Waiting List for Kidney Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Patients on organ transplant waiting lists are evaluated for preexisting alloimmunity to minimize episodes of acute and chronic rejection by regularly monitoring for changes in alloimmune status. There are few studies on how alloimmunity changes over time in patients on kidney allograft waiting lists, and an apparent lack of research-based evidence supporting currently used monitoring intervals. METHODS: To investigate the dynamics of alloimmune responses directed at HLA antigens, we retrospectively evaluated data on anti-HLA antibodies measured by the single-antigen bead assay from 627 waitlisted patients who subsequently received a kidney transplant at University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland, between 2008 and 2017. Our analysis focused on a filtered dataset comprising 467 patients who had at least two assay measurements. RESULTS: Within the filtered dataset, we analyzed potential changes in mean fluorescence intensity values (reflecting bound anti-HLA antibodies) between consecutive measurements for individual patients in relation to the time interval between measurements. Using multiple approaches, we found no correlation between these two factors. However, when we stratified the dataset on the basis of documented previous immunizing events (transplant, pregnancy, or transfusion), we found significant differences in the magnitude of change in alloimmune status, especially among patients with a previous transplant versus patients without such a history. Further efforts to cluster patients according to statistical properties related to alloimmune status kinetics were unsuccessful, indicating considerable complexity in individual variability. CONCLUSIONS: Alloimmune kinetics in patients on a kidney transplant waiting list do not appear to be related to the interval between measurements, but are instead associated with alloimmunization history. This suggests that an individualized strategy for alloimmune status monitoring may be preferable to currently used intervals.

Isoantibodies, prevalence and risk factors in two hospitals in Mexico / Isoanticuerpos, prevalencia y factores de riesgo en dos hospitales de México

Background: Erythrocyte isoimmunization or alloimmunization is a late complication of transfusion, in which antibodies against erythrocyte antigens other than the ABO system are developed. Its prevalence is variable, groups of patients with low prevalence (2%) and others of high risk with more than 50% have been described. These antibodies can have serious clinical repercussions in transfused patients. Objective: To know the prevalence of erythrocyte isoimmunization, the risk factors for its development and the types of antibodies developed in the user population of two hospitals in Mexico. Methods: Retrospective study. The database of the Blood Bank and the Transfusion Service of two hospitals was analyzed for the search of transfused patients who developed isoantibodies from 2012 to 2016, analyzing their background to determine the risk factors, prevalence and type of antibodies. Results: An isoimmunization prevalence of 0.97% was found in 5 years; the main antibodies found were: anti-E, anti-K, anti-C, anti-Dia, anti-c, anti-D and anti-Fya. The associated risk factors for the development of isoimmunization were: transfusion history, pregnancy and female sex, as a finding it was found that group O is a protective factor. Conclusions: Erythrocyte alloimmunization in the population studied corresponded to a low prevalence. The main antibodies found were against Rh, Kell and Diego system antigens, with a different distribution than published in other international series. No previous report was found about the finding on group O as a protective factor for isoimmunization.

Introducción: la isoinmunización o aloinmunización eritrocitaria es una complicación tardía de la transfusión, en la cual se desarrollan anticuerpos contra antígenos eritrocitarios diferentes al sistema ABO. Su prevalencia es variable, se han descrito grupos de pacientes con baja prevalencia (2%) y otros de alto riesgo con más del 50%. Estos anticuerpos pueden tener repercusiones clínicas graves en los pacientes transfundidos. Objetivo: conocer la prevalencia de la isoinmunización eritrocitaria, los factores de riesgo para su desarrollo y los tipos de anticuerpos desarrollados en la población usuaria de dos hospitales en México. Métodos: estudio retrospectivo. Se analizó la base de datos del banco de sangre y del servicio de transfusión de dos hospitales para la búsqueda de pacientes transfundidos que desarrollaron isoanticuerpos del año 2012 al 2016, analizando sus antecedentes para determinar los factores de riesgo, prevalencia y tipo de anticuerpos. Resultados: se encontró una prevalencia de isoinmunización del 0.97% en 5 años; los principales anticuerpos encontrados fueron: anti-E, anti-K, anti-C, anti-Dia, anti-c, anti-D y anti-Fya. Los factores de riesgo asociados para el desarrollo de isoinmunización fueron: antecedentes transfusionales, embarazo y el sexo femenino, como hallazgo se encontró que el grupo O es un factor protector. Conclusiones: la aloinmunización eritrocitaria en la población estudiada correspondió a una prevalencia baja. Los principales anticuerpos encontrados fueron contra antígenos del sistema Rh, Kell y Diego, con una distribución diferente a lo publicado en otras series internacionales. No se encontró reporte previo acerca del hallazgo sobre el grupo O como factor protector para isoinmunización.

Second Tunisian case of Anti -Tja mediated recurrent abortions.

The diagnosis and the treatment of rare phenotypes remain a problematic situation in many countries especially in Tunisia. Individuals with rare phenotype may develop clinically significant red cell antibodies directed against the high incidence Antigens they lack. A 35 years old patient was referred to our laboratory to explain a high incidence (twelve) of recurrent miscarriage during the first and second terms of pregnancy. This patient was grouped as O Rhesus: 1, -2, -3, 4, 5 K:-1. In her plasma we identified a pan-reactive anti-PP1PK antibody (anti-Tja) recognized to be responsible of spontaneous recurrent abortions. The red cell phenotype was P1 and Tja negative. More investigations concluded to the absence of auto and other allo-antibodies association. Therapeutic plasmapheresis from early stages was suggested for the future pregnancy to remove anti-public antibodies in order to maintain normal placenta functions. The Anti-Tja antibody, naturally occurring in patients with rare p phenotype, has the ability to induce recurrent spontaneous miscarriages and to cause immediate hemolytic transfusion reactions. Despite the absence of compatible donors in her family, this patient is not in an impasse situation because two donors with the same phenotype were identified when investigating a first case in 2013.

Safety issues related to the electronic cross-matching of blood in mainland China: A prospective cohort study involving cross-matching of 40,228 blood samples.

Although the electronic cross-matching of blood has been widely applied in some developed countries and regions, concern over the risk of undetected red blood cell (RBC) antibodies has limited its application in mainland China.This study was performed to explore the missed detection rate of RBC antibodies in a Chinese population from 2011 to 2016. If the results of 2 consecutive tests of ABO/RhD blood group identification were consistent and antibody screening results were negative, electronic cross-matching of the blood was performed. In addition, traditional serological cross-matching of blood (polybrene method) and a parallel experiment for electronic cross-matching of blood were performed to analyze the missed detection of unexpected RBC antibodies in blood donors and recipients.Using the polybrene method, 40,228 blood samples were tested by parallel traditional serological cross-matching of blood; among these samples, blood compatibility was found in 40,222 cases, primary incompatibility (incompatibility of the donor's erythrocytes with the recipient's serum) was found in 6 cases, and no secondary incompatibility was found. Identification of antibody specificity was performed using panel cells, and all unexpected RBC antibodies were confirmed as anti-Mur alloantibodies in the MNS system.Further improvements in the erythrocyte antigenic spectrum, especially the Mur antigen in Asian populations, are expected to ensure the safety of implementing electronic cross-matching in China.

Relevance of donor-specific antibody monitoring after kidney transplantation: Findings from the Collaborative Transplant Study and the Heidelberg Transplant Center.

Monitoring of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) has become part of the clinical routine in kidney transplantation. This paper gives a brief overview on data from the Collaborative Transplant Study (CTS) and the Heidelberg Transplant Center on the clinical relevance of post-transplant DSA monitoring in patients undergoing renal transplantation. The obtained findings underline the importance of DSA monitoring in the post-operative course in immunologically high-risk patients and patients with deterioration of graft function. Especially in patients with a pre-activated immune system, a gap in the immunosuppressive therapy appear to lead to persistence, reappearance or de novo occurrence of strong, complement-activating DSA, resulting in severe antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) and, without timely intervention, in AMR-related graft loss.

Fast and low-cost direct ELISA for high-throughput serological HPA-1a typing.

BACKGROUND: Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) is caused by maternal alloantibodies against fetal human platelet antigens (HPAs), mostly caused by anti-HPA-1a. Population-based screening for FNAIT is still a topic of debate. Logistically and financially, the major challenge for implementation is the typing of pregnant women to recognize the 2% HPA-1a-negative women. Therefore, there is need for a high-throughput and low-cost HPA-1a-typing assay. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A sandwich ELISA was developed, using a monoclonal anti-GPIIIa as coating antibody and horseradish-peroxidase-conjugated recombinant anti-HPA-1a, as detecting antibody. The ELISA results were compared to an allelic discrimination PCR-assay. In phase I, samples from unselected consecutive pregnant women were tested with both assays. Phase II was part of a prospective screening study in pregnancy and genotyping was restricted to samples with an arbitrary set, OD < 0.500. RESULTS: The ELISA was optimized to require no additional handling (swirling or spinning) of stored tubes. During phase I, 506 samples were tested. In phase II, another 62,171 consecutive samples were phenotyped, with supportive genotyping in 1,902. In total 1,585 HPA-1a negative and 823 HPA-1a positive women were genotyped. The assay reached 100% sensitivity with a cut-off OD from 0.160, corresponding with a 99.9% specificity and a false-HPA-1a negative rate of 0.03. CONCLUSION: A high-throughput, low-cost, and reliable HPA-1a phenotyping assay was developed which can be used in population-based screening to select samples for testing of presence of anti-HPA-1a. Because plasma from tubes of 3- to 6-days-old samples can be used, this assay is applicable to settings with suboptimal conditions.

Detection of Intragraft Anti-Blood Group A and B Antibodies Following Renal Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Graft immunocomplex capture fluorescence analysis is an attractive method to detect intragraft donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies. In ABO-incompatible transplantation, anti-A and B antibodies are also considered to be important donor specific antibodies (ABO-DSA). Therefore, it is useful to monitor intragraft ABO-DSAs to assess antibody-mediated rejection. METHODS: To capture A and B antigens, anti-Band III, von Willebrand factor (VW), and plasmalemma vesicle-associated protein (PLVAP) beads were produced. The allograft specimen was homogenized in a lysis buffer. Subsequently, A and B antigens were captured by anti-Band III, VW, or PLVAP beads. The immune complexes were then detected by phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-human IgG antibodies and analyzed using a Luminex system. RESULTS: Although Band III and VW beads yielded false positives and false negatives, PLVAP beads captured A and B antigens with high sensitivity (91.7%) and specificity (100%) when an index > 1.5 was considered positive. The proximity in A and B antigens and PLVAP expression was confirmed using immunohistochemical evaluation. Furthermore, sodium dodecyl sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis supported that PLVAP is an A and B antigen carrier protein. CASE REPORT: Biopsies were conducted following an ABO-incompatible renal transplant (type A to O) and evaluated for ABO-DSA. Graft immunocomplex capture fluorescence analysis was demonstrated as follows: 3.19 (1 h, serum creatinine [s-Cr] 3.95 mg/dL, titer IgG 1:512, glomerulitis [g] 0, peritubular capillaritis [ptc] 0, complement 4d [C4d] 1); 1.8 (4 d, s-Cr 2.29 mg/dL, titer 1:256, g 0, ptc 0, C4d 3); 1.2 (22 d, s-Cr 1.58 mg/dL, titer 1:128, g 0, ptc 2, C4d 3). This result indicated that the remnant ABO-DSA were adsorbed and subsequently removed from the allograft successfully. CONCLUSIONS: This novel application could be used to detect intragraft ABO-DSAs, which could lead to a correct diagnosis and shed light on the ABO-DSA kinetics following ABO-incompatible transplantation.

Graft Immunocomplex Capture Fluorescence Analysis Can Detect Intragraft Anti-Major Histocompatibility Complex Antibodies in Mice Cardiac Transplant.

BACKGROUND: Immunocomplex capture fluorescence analysis has recently been applied as a method for detection of intragraft donor-specific anti-major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antibodies (DSA) in humans. Although intragraft DSA in humans is an intense topic of investigation, there is no report to assess intragraft DSA in murine organ transplantation. METHODS: A model of presensitized mouse cardiac transplantation by donor splenocytes was used. To capture mouse MHC, anti-MHC class I/II antibodies were immobilized on Luminex beads. The MHC/DSA complexes were captured by the Luminex beads followed by detection of phycoerythrin-conjugated antimouse IgG antibodies where DSA had already reacted with the allograft in vivo. RESULTS: Luminex beads were capable of detecting class I DSA in the cardiac allograft, though results for class II DSA were negative. Immunohistochemical investigation revealed that cardiac allografts had abundant MHC class I expression but only minor expression of MHC class II. Furthermore, MHC/class II DSA complexes were successfully detected in splenocytes and serum from a presensitized recipient. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggested that graft immunocomplex capture fluorescence analysis can be also applied in murine cardiac transplantation. This novel application in mice would accelerate our comprehension of DSA through mechanistic studies.

Comparison of Single Antigen Bead-Based, Cell-Based, and Solid Phase-Based Crossmatch Methods.

AIM: Antibody assessment during pretransplantation term is important to detect donor specific antibodies. These donor-specific antibodies are determined by various crossmatch methods (flow cytometric [FCXM], complement-dependent cytotoxic [CDCXM], and Luminex [LMXM]). Recently, single antigen bead (SAB) assays have been used for the assessment of hypersensitized patients. The aim of this study was to compare sensitivity and specificity of the 3 crossmatch methods in reference to the SAB method. METHOD: In this study, 69 hypersensitized patients with high class I and/or class II panel reactive antibodies were tested using the flow cytometric SAB method. Serum samples were cross-matched by 3 crossmatch methods with the cells of a volunteer healthy individual, and the results were evaluated according to HLA and cross-reactive epitope groups (CREGs). RESULTS: Sensitivity was found to be better with T FCXM (0.91) and class I LMXM (0.87). Specificity of peripheral blood lymphocyte CDCXM method (1.0) was found to be better than the other 2 methods (0.33 and 0.57, respectively). Sensitivity of class II LMXM (0.88) was found to be better than the others (0.42 for B CDCXM and 0.82 for B FCXM, respectively). The specificity of the B CDCXM, B FCXM, and class II LMXM was similar (0.44, 0.44, and 0.33, respectively). CREGs results were similar to HLA results. CONCLUSION: Although CDCXM has high specificity for the detection of anti-HLA antibodies, it has low sensitivity. To increase sensitivity, FCXM or LMXM methods may be used with the CDCXM test. These results will be beneficial for laboratories and clinicians during graft survival and patient health assessment.