Mexiletine versus lamotrigine in non-dystrophic myotonias: a randomised, double-blind, head-to-head, crossover, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Non-dystrophic myotonias are skeletal muscle channelopathies caused by ion channel dysfunction. Symptom onset is frequently in the first decade of life, causing disability in a young cohort. Although there is no cure, symptomatic treatments exist. Previous trials provide evidence of the efficacy of mexiletine. More recently, lamotrigine has been shown to be effective. Both treatments have different profiles, including pharmacokinetics and adverse events. This trial aimed to investigate whether lamotrigine is non-inferior to mexiletine to directly inform clinical practice. METHODS: We did a randomised, double-blind, crossover, non-inferiority, phase 3 trial at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (London, UK). Participants (aged ≥18 years) who had genetically confirmed symptomatic non-dystrophic myotonia were randomly assigned (1:1), by means of a block randomisation schedule created by a computer program, to receive either mexiletine for 8 weeks followed by lamotrigine for 8 weeks, or lamotrigine followed by mexiletine, with a 7-day washout period in between. Investigators and participants were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome measure was the mean interactive voice response (IVR) diary stiffness score (0-9 scale) over the participant's final 2 weeks of diary reporting in each treatment period. Non-inferiority was assessed using a mixed-effects model with a predefined margin of 0·5 and included all randomly assigned participants who contributed at least 7 days of IVR-diary data in either treatment period. The trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05017155, and EudraCT, 2020-003375-17. FINDINGS: Between Aug 1, 2021, and Dec 12, 2022, of 60 participants were screened (24 females and 36 males) and randomly assigned between Aug 1, 2021 and Dec 12, 2022, to either the mexiletine-lamotrigine sequence (n=30) or the lamotrigine-mexiletine sequence (n=30). 53 participants contributed data to the primary analysis. The mean IVR stiffness score after treatment with mexiletine was 2·54 (95% CI 1·98 to 3·10) versus 2·77 (2·21 to 3·32) with lamotrigine (mean mexiletine-lamotrigine difference -0·23 [95% CI -0·63 to 0·17]). The most common adverse event with both treatments was indigestion-reflux (eight participants, 208 participant-days receiving mexiletine; seven participants, 130 participant-days receiving lamotrigine). No serious adverse events were reported. INTERPRETATION: We were unable to conclude that lamotrigine is non-inferior to mexiletine; however, improvements in all outcome measures from baseline were similar between lamotrigine and mexiletine. Lamotrigine is an important treatment consideration in non-dystrophic myotonias alongside mexiletine; we propose a treatment algorithm to guide clinical practice. FUNDING: Neuromuscular Study Group, Jon Moulton Charity Trust, UCLH BRC Fast Track Grant.

Olanzapine vs. magnesium valproate vs. lamotrigine in anti-N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptor encephalitis: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the impact of olanzapine, magnesium valproate, and lamotrigine as adjunctive treatments for anti-N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) encephalitis. And it is expected to add supporting points related to the rebalance of neurotransmitters in the brain through adjuvant therapy in the clinical management of anti-NMDAR encephalitis. METHODS: This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with anti-NMDAR encephalitis who received standardized immunotherapy at Hunan Brain Hospital between January 2018 and December 2020. RESULTS: Compared to the olanzapine group, both the magnesium valproate and lamotrigine groups showed lower scores on the positive and negative symptom scale (PANSS) total score after 3 weeks of treatment (all P < 0.05). The Montreal Cognitive Assessment Scale (MoCA) scores in the magnesium valproate and lamotrigine groups were significantly higher than in the olanzapine group after 3 weeks and 3 months of treatment (all P < 0.05). After 3 months of treatment, the proportions of patients with a modified Rankin scale score (mRS) of 0-1 in the magnesium valproate and lamotrigine groups were significantly higher than in the olanzapine group (all P < 0.05). The electroencephalogram (EEG) abnormality ranks at 3 months were significantly lower in the magnesium valproate and lamotrigine groups compared with the olanzapine group (all P < 0.05). Furthermore, the Glx/Cr ratio significantly decreased after 3 months of treatment (all P < 0.05) in the magnesium valproate and lamotrigine groups, while the Glx/Cr ratio in the olanzapine group showed no significant change (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with olanzapine, the addition of magnesium valproate or lamotrigine to immunotherapy might be associated with a lower PANSS score, higher MoCA score, and lower mRS score. The improvement of neurological functions and cognitive function may be related to the decreased Glx/Cr ratio.

Advances in Mood Disorder Pharmacotherapy: Evaluating New Antipsychotics and Mood Stabilizers for Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia.

This article provides a narrative review of recent developments in mood-stabilizing drugs, considering their mechanism of action, efficacy, safety, and therapeutic potential in the treatment of mood disorders, particularly bipolar disorder and schizophrenia. The review focuses on the mechanism and clinical aspects of second-generation antipsychotic medications; aripiprazole, classified as a third-generation antipsychotic medication; lamotrigine, as a representative of antiepileptic drugs; and lurasidone, a novel second-generation antipsychotic medication. Moreover, the article refers to one of the newest and most highly effective normothymic drugs, cariprazine. The potential of new mood stabilizer candidates lumateperone and brexpiprazole is also presented. Covered topics include the clinical efficacy of new drugs in reducing manic and depressive symptoms during acute episodes, as well as their role in preventing relapse. In addition, we analyzed the incidence of adverse effects of each drug. Many of the new drugs have strong potential to be beneficial and safe in cases of many comorbidities, as they do not cause many adverse effects and do not require high doses of use. The results underscore the importance of ongoing and future research to better understand the action and efficacy of these mood stabilizers and their implications in the treatment of mood disorders, aiming to achieve euthymia and improve the quality of life of affected patients. In this article, we aim to review current drug treatments for the management of mood disorders, including bipolar disorder and schizophrenia.

Cognitive outcomes after fetal exposure to carbamazepine, lamotrigine, valproate or levetiracetam monotherapy: Data from the EURAP neurocognitive extension protocol.

PURPOSE: Prenatal exposure to antiseizure medications (ASMs) has been associated with an increased risk of major malformations and neurodevelopmental disorders, with the latter being mainly associated with valproate (VPA). Our aim was to compare neurocognitive outcome at age 6-7 years in children exposed prenatally to lamotrigine (LTG), carbamazepine (CBZ), valproate (VPA) or levetiracetam (LEV) monotherapy. METHODS: Eligible mother-child pairs were identified from the observational prospective multinational EURAP cohort study. Assessor-blinded testing was conducted at age 6-7 years using WISC-III and NEPSY-II. Verbal IQ (VIQ), performance IQ (PIQ), full scale IQ (FSIQ) and performance in neuropsychological tasks were compared across ASM groups by ANOVA. Scores were adjusted for maternal IQ, paternal education, maternal epilepsy type and child sex. RESULTS: Of 169 children enrolled in the study, 162 (LTG n = 80, CBZ n = 37, VPA n = 27, LEV n = 18) had sufficient data from WISC-III, NEPSY-II or both, and were included in the analyses. Observed (unadjusted) PIQ and FSIQ did not differ across exposure groups, but a difference was identified for VIQ (P<0.05), with children exposed to VPA having lower scores than children exposed to LEV (P<0.05) and children from all groups combined (P<0.01). Adjusted VIQ, PIQ and FSIQ scores did not differ significantly across groups, but VPA-exposed children had borderline significantly lower adjusted VIQ scores than children from all groups combined (P=0.051). VPA-exposed children had lower scores in comprehension of instructions before and after adjustment for confounding variables than children exposed to LTG (P<0.001), LEV (P<0.01) or children from all groups combined (p < 0.001). The VPA-exposed group also had lower scores in immediate and delayed memory for faces compared to children exposed to CBZ (P<0.05 and P<0.001, respectively) and LTG (P<0.05 and P<0.02, respectively), and children from all groups combined (P<0.02 and P<0.001, respectively). LEV-exposed children had lower scores in delayed memory for names than children exposed to LTG (P<0.001), CBZ (P<0.001), VPA (P<0.05) and children from all groups combined (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with previous reports, our results provide evidence for an adverse effect of prenatal exposure to valproate on verbal development. Our finding of relatively weaker performance of VPA-exposed children compared to other ASM exposures in both comprehension of instructions and face memory also suggest that children of mothers treated with VPA are at increased risk for compromised memory functions or altered processing of socially relevant information.

The Adverse Effects of Commonly Prescribed Antiseizure Medications in Adults With Newly Diagnosed Focal Epilepsy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Systematic screening can help identify antiseizure medication (ASM)-associated adverse events (AEs) that may preclude patients from reaching effective doses or completing adequate trial periods. The Adverse Event Profile (AEP) is a self-completed instrument to identify the frequency of common AEs associated with ASM use. This study aimed to compare the AE profile of commonly used ASMs in adults with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. METHODS: The Human Epilepsy Project is a prospective, international, observational study investigating markers of treatment response in newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. Participants were enrolled within 4 months of treatment initiation. Adult participants on levetiracetam, lamotrigine, carbamazepine, or oxcarbazepine monotherapy who completed the AEP and Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview at enrollment were included. Multivariable generalized linear and penalized logistic regression models assessed differences in total and itemized marginal AEP scores and dichotomized responses ("never/rarely" vs "sometimes/always"). RESULTS: A total of 225 adults initiated on levetiracetam (n = 132, 59%), lamotrigine (n = 55, 24%), carbamazepine (n = 19, 8.4%), or oxcarbazepine (n = 19, 8.4%) were included. There were no significant differences in AEP total scores between ASMs. Patients with depression (adjusted marginal score ratio [aMSR] 1.23, 95% CI 1.09-1.39, p = 0.001) and anxiety (aMSR 1.15, 95% CI 1.04-1.26, p = 0.007) had worse AEP total scores than those without. After adjusting for depression and anxiety, levetiracetam users were >3 times more likely to report feelings of aggression (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.38, 95% CI 1.07-10.7, p = 0.038) and almost half as likely to experience unsteadiness (aOR 0.45, 95% CI 0.21-0.99, p = 0.047) than lamotrigine users. Carbamazepine and oxcarbazepine had the highest rates of discontinuation (42.1%, each), followed by levetiracetam (34.8%) and lamotrigine (16.4%). Levetiracetam users had the highest proportion of discontinuations because of AEs alone (18%), and lamotrigine had the lowest (5%). DISCUSSION: Systematic screening for AEs in adults with newly diagnosed focal epilepsy on ASM monotherapy showed that those with comorbid psychiatric conditions report greater AEs overall, irrespective of ASM. Levetiracetam was associated with >3-fold risk of psychiatric AEs and half the risk of experiencing unsteadiness than lamotrigine. Levetiracetam had the highest proportion of discontinuations because of AEs alone, while lamotrigine had the lowest.

Effect of Genetic Polymorphisms of ABCB1, ABCG2, and SLC22A1 on the Steady-State Plasma Concentrations of Lamotrigine in Treatment-Resistant Depressed Patients Treated With Lamotrigine Augmentation Therapy.

OBJECTIVES: The authors have demonstrated that a plasma lamotrigine concentration of 12.7 µmol/L may be a threshold for a good therapeutic response to lamotrigine augmentation therapy in treatment-resistant depressed patients. Lamotrigine is a substrate of P-glycoprotein, breast cancer resistant protein and organic cation transporter 1, which are encoded by ABCB1 , ABCG2 , and SLC22A1 , respectively. There have been several polymorphisms that affect its function. The present study investigated the relationship between these polymorphisms and the steady-state plasma concentrations (Css) of lamotrigine in treatment-resistant depressed patients receiving lamotrigine as augmentation therapy. METHODS: One hundred twenty-nine treatment-resistant depressed patients were included in this study. Treatment resistance is defined as lack of therapeutic response to at least 3 psychotropics despite adequate doses and duration. Their diagnoses were as follows: major depressive disorder (n = 58), bipolar II disorder (n = 52), and bipolar I disorder (n = 19). Lamotrigine augmentation therapy for 8 weeks was conducted. The final lamotrigine doses were 75 mg/d for 39 patients with valproate and 100 mg/d for 90 without it. Blood was sampled at 8:00 am after the 8th week of treatment. Plasma lamotrigine levels were quantified by using LC/MS/MS. The polymorphisms of ABCB1 1236C>T, 2677G>T/A, 3435C>T, ABCG2 421C>A, and SLC22A1 1222G>A were detected by polymerase chain reaction analyses. RESULTS: No significant relationships were observed between these polymorphisms and the Css of lamotrigine in the patients with or without valproate. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that these genetic polymorphisms do not play a role in controlling the Css of lamotrigine in treatment-resistant depressed patients treated with lamotrigine augmentation therapy.

Pharmacogenetic Variants and Plasma Concentrations of Antiseizure Drugs: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Importance: Precise estimation of a patient's drug metabolism capacity is important for antiseizure dose personalization. Objective: To quantify the differences in plasma concentrations for antiseizure drugs associated with variants of genes encoding drug metabolizing enzymes. Data Sources: PubMed, Clinicaltrialsregister.eu, ClinicalTrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and CENTRAL databases were screened for studies from January 1, 1990, to September 30, 2023, without language restrictions. Study Selection: Two reviewers performed independent study screening and assessed the following inclusion criteria: appropriate genotyping was performed, genotype-based categorization into subgroups was possible, and each subgroup contained at least 3 participants. Data Extraction and Synthesis: The Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) guidelines were followed for data extraction and subsequent quality, validity, and risk-of-bias assessments. The results from the included studies were pooled with random-effect meta-analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Plasma concentrations of antiseizure drugs were quantified with the dose-normalized area under the concentration-time curve, the dose-normalized steady state concentration, or the concentrations after a single dose at standardized dose and sampling time. The ratio of the means was calculated by dividing the mean drug plasma concentrations of carriers and noncarriers of the pharmacogenetic variant. Results: Data from 98 studies involving 12 543 adult participants treated with phenytoin, valproate, lamotrigine, or carbamazepine were analyzed. Studies were mainly conducted within East Asian (69 studies) or White or European (15 studies) cohorts. Significant increases of plasma concentrations compared with the reference subgroup were observed for phenytoin, by 46% (95% CI, 33%-61%) in CYP2C9 intermediate metabolizers, 20% (95% CI, 17%-30%) in CYP2C19 intermediate metabolizers, and 39% (95% CI, 24%-56%) in CYP2C19 poor metabolizers; for valproate, by 12% (95% CI, 4%-20%) in CYP2C9 intermediate metabolizers, 12% (95% CI, 2%-24%) in CYP2C19 intermediate metabolizers, and 20% (95% CI, 2%-41%) in CYP2C19 poor metabolizers; and for carbamazepine, by 12% (95% CI, 3%-22%) in CYP3A5 poor metabolizers. Conclusions and Relevance: This systematic review and meta-analysis found that CYP2C9 and CYP2C19 genotypes encoding low enzymatic capacity were associated with a clinically relevant increase in phenytoin plasma concentrations, several pharmacogenetic variants were associated with statistically significant but only marginally clinically relevant changes in valproate and carbamazepine plasma concentrations, and numerous pharmacogenetic variants were not associated with statistically significant differences in plasma concentrations of antiseizure drugs.

Impact of UGT1A4 and UGT2B7 polymorphisms on lamotrigine plasma concentration in patients with bipolar disorder.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of UGT1A4 and UGT2B7 polymorphisms on the plasma concentration of lamotrigine in Chinese patients with bipolar disorder. METHODS: A total of 104 patients were included in this study. Steady-state plasma lamotrigine concentrations were determined in each patient after at least 21 days of continuous treatment with a set dose of the drug. Lamotrigine plasma concentrations were ascertained using ultra-performance liquid chromatography. Simultaneously, plasma samples were used for patient genotyping. RESULTS: The age, sex, BMI, daily lamotrigine dose, plasma lamotrigine concentration, and lamotrigine concentration/dose ratio of patients exhibited significant differences, and these were associated with differences in the genotype [ UGT1A4 -142T>G and UGT2B7 -161C>T ( P  < 0.05)]. Patients with the GG and GT genotypes in UGT1A4 -142T>G had significantly higher lamotrigine concentration/dose values (1.6 ±â€…1.1 and 1.7 ±â€…0.5 µg/ml per mg/kg) than those with the TT genotype (1.4 ±â€…1.1 µg/ml per mg/kg). Likewise, patients with the UGT2B7 -161C>T TT genotype had significantly higher lamotrigine concentration/dose values (1.6 ±â€…1.1 µg/ml per mg/kg) than those with the CC genotype (1.3 ±â€…1.3 µg/ml per mg/kg). Multiple linear regression analysis showed that sex, lamotrigine dose, UGT1A4 -142T>G, and UGT2B7 -161C>T were the most important factors influencing lamotrigine pharmacokinetics ( P  < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The study results suggest that the UGT1A4 -142T>G and UGT2B7 -161C>T polymorphisms affect lamotrigine plasma concentrations in patients with bipolar disorder.

An international study to investigate and optimise the safety of discontinuing valproate in young men and women with epilepsy: Protocol.

Valproate is the most effective treatment for idiopathic generalised epilepsy. Currently, its use is restricted in women of childbearing potential owing to high teratogenicity. Recent evidence extended this risk to men's offspring, prompting recommendations to restrict use in everybody aged <55 years. This study will evaluate mortality and morbidity risks associated with valproate withdrawal by emulating a hypothetical randomised-controlled trial (called a "target trial") using retrospective observational data. The data will be drawn from ~250m mainly US patients in the TriNetX repository and ~60m UK patients in Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD). These will be scanned for individuals aged 16-54 years with epilepsy and on valproate who either continued, switched to lamotrigine or levetiracetam, or discontinued valproate between 2014-2024, creating four groups. Randomisation to these groups will be emulated by baseline confounder adjustment using g-methods. Mortality and morbidity outcomes will be assessed and compared between groups over 1-10 years, employing time-to-first-event and recurrent events analyses. A causal prediction model will be developed from these data to aid in predicting the safest alternative antiseizure medications. Together, these findings will optimise informed decision-making about valproate withdrawal and alternative treatment selection, providing immediate and vital information for patients, clinicians and regulators.

Trends in prescription of anti-seizure medications in Japan between 2018 and 2021: A retrospective study using the National Database Open Data Japan.

PURPOSE: This retrospective study aimed to analyze anti-seizure medication (ASM) prescription trends in Japan, particularly among older adults and women of childbearing age, to inform future treatment strategies and optimize ASM selection criteria. METHODS: Data were extracted from the National Database Open Data Japan for fiscal years (FY) 2018-2021, covering prescriptions across sex and 5-year age groups. We conducted data imputation for prescriptions under 1,000 units to maintain anonymity, calculated the estimated number of patients using standard adult maintenance doses, and adjusted for pediatric dosing using Augsberger's formula. RESULTS: Our analysis revealed a 7.6% increase in ASM usage, with a notable shift from older to newer ASMs, such as levetiracetam (LEV) and lamotrigine (LTG). LEV and LTG prescriptions increased by 26.7% and 15.0% from FY 2018 to FY 2021, respectively, whereas older ASMs such as phenytoin, declined. Sex-specific analysis showed a higher LTG prescription rate among women, especially in adolescent and young adult cohorts, where the female-to-male prescription ratio increased from 1.65 to 1.85. Valproate (VPA) and LEV accounted for 57.0% of ASM prescriptions in older adults. The number of inpatient LTG prescriptions was notably lower than that of outpatient LTG prescriptions across age groups. Pediatric use of generics was lower than that in other age groups. CONCLUSION: This study revealed that newer ASMs are being used increasingly, with a significant proportion of VPA continuously prescribed among women of childbearing age. In older adults, VPA and LEV accounted for more than half of the ASM prescriptions. These findings are crucial for developing future treatment strategies and improving the ASM selection criteria.

UGT1A4*3 polymorphism influences serum concentration and therapeutic effect of lamotrigine for epilepsy treatment: A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Lamotrigine as a broad-spectrum antiepileptic drug, is widely applied and its clinical efficacy is highly recognized. However, significant differences are observed in blood drug concentration of lamotrigine among individuals, which may have an impact on its efficacy. UGT1A4 is the main metabolic enzyme. However, it was inconsistent for the influence of UGT1A4 genetic polymorphism on concentration and efficacy of lamotrigine therapy. This study aimed to evaluate the influences of UGT1A4*3 genetic polymorphisms on lamotrigine concentration and therapeutic effect through meta-analysis. METHODS: The literature search was conducted in Medline, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Wan Fang Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal Database until January 2024. The primary outcome included the mean serum concentration, concentration-to-dose-ratio by body weight (CDR), or efficacy related to different UGT1A4*3 genotype for lamotrigine therapy. Data were collected to access the Mean Difference or odds ratio with 95% confidence interval. Meta-analysis was performed by RevMan 5.2. RESULTS: A total of eleven studies were enrolled. The meta-analysis for mean serum concentration of lamotrigine showed no significant difference between patients carrying TT genotypes and TG and GG genotypes group (MD: 0.12, 95% [-0.35, 0.58], P = 0.62). There was significant difference in CDR (MD: 0.49, 95% [0.03, 0.94], P = 0.04) and therapeutic efficacy (OR: 7.18, 95% [4.01, 12.83], P<0.00001) of lamotrigine, however no significant difference was found in subgroup analysis of CDR of children (MD: 0.03, 95% [-0.35, 0.42], P = 0.87) between patients carrying TT genotypes and TG and GG genotypes group. CONCLUSIONS: Polymorphism of UGT1A4*3 influenced the CDR and therapeutic efficacy of lamotrigine for antiepileptic therapy. Genotype analysis provided reference for personalized medication in the future. However, more high-quality evidences are necessary for precise and definitive conclusion.

In women with epilepsy, use of valproate in the second half of pregnancy was linked to autism in offspring.

SOURCE CITATION: Hernández-Díaz S, Straub L, Bateman BT, et al. Risk of autism after prenatal topiramate, valproate, or lamotrigine exposure. N Engl J Med. 2024;390:1069-1079. 38507750.

Clinical study of the effect of 5 kinds of antiepileptic drugs on the postictal state.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of levetiracetam（LEV）, lamotrigine(LTG), oxcarbazepine(OXC), topiramate(TPM) and valproate (VPA) on postictal state (PIS). METHODS: A total of 187 epilepsy patients undergoing monotherapy were enrolled in a long-term follow-up study at the Affiliated Hospital of Yangzhou College. This included 30 patients on levetiracetam, 41 on valproate, 30 on oxcarbazepine, 28 on topiramate, and 31 on lamotrigine. A control group of 28 newly diagnosed or previously untreated epilepsy patients was also included. The Liverpool Seizure Severity Scale 2.0 (LSSS2.0) and the Seizure Severity Questionnaire (SSQ) were utilized to evaluate the patients' condition, with comparison based on the results of the postictal status items. EEG during PIS termination was assessed using the Grand Total EEG score (GTE) as an objective tool to measure the impact of Antiseizure medications (ASMs) on the post-seizure state. RESULTS: The LSSS2.0 score indicated a statistically significant difference in post-seizure status score among the 5 groups (p < 0.05). The difference between the 5 groups and the control group was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Results of the SSQ demonstrated that all 5 drugs significantly reduced the post-seizure status score compared to the control group (p < 0.05). The GTE score revealed that, in the later stage of the seizure, the GTE score of the levetiracetam group, valproate group, oxcarbazepine group, and lamotrigine group significantly decreased compared to the control group (P < 0.05). There was no significant decrease in the GTE score in the topiramate group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Levetiracetam, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, topiramate, and valproate demonstrate favorable efficacy in ameliorating the severity of post-seizure condition. Further investigations are warranted to assess the potential of other widely employed anti-seizure medications in enhancing post-seizure status.

Seizure control and adverse outcomes of lamotrigine use during pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This review aims to summarize existing evidence on the adverse pregnancy outcomes and seizure control effects of using lamotrigine (LTG) monotherapy in pregnancy women with epilepsy (WWE) during pregnancy. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted in various databases including Cochrane, Web of Science, CBM, PubMed, Embase, CNKI, and Pregnancy Registration Center databases to identify relevant studies. The search was concluded up to January 2024. Studies comparing LTG with other antiseizure medications (ASMs) for treating epilepsy in pregnant women were included, with no language or regional restrictions. RESULTS: A total of 19 studies were included for analysis, with 16 studies reporting adverse pregnancy outcomes and 6 studies reporting seizure control outcomes. Meta-analysis showed that compared to monotherapy with carbamazepine (CBZ), sodium valproate (VPA), and levetiracetam (LEV), LTG monotherapy had a slightly weaker ability to control seizures during pregnancy, with ORs and 95 %CIs of 0.65 (0.57-0.75; CBZ), 0.50 (0.32-0.79; VPA), and 0.55 (0.36-0.84; LEV). Regarding adverse pregnancy outcomes, the occurrence rate of LTG monotherapy was significantly lower than that of CBZ, VPA, phenytoin (PHT), and phenobarbital (PHB), with ORs and 95 %CIs ranging from 0.30 (0.25-0.35; VPA) to 0.68 (0.56-0.81; CBZ). CONCLUSION: Based on meta-analysis, LTG and LEV appear to be preferred medications for controlling seizures during pregnancy. This review provides further support for the use of LTG monotherapy in pregnant WWE, building upon existing evidence for clinical practitioners.

Acute kidney injury in lamotrigine-induced DRESS syndrome.

We present a case of lamotrigine-triggered DRESS (drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms) syndrome with acute kidney injury stage 3. A 17-year-old girl with known epilepsy treated with lamotrigine presented with acute kidney injury as well as skin eruption, fever, and apathy. Extended diagnostics, considering infectious and autoimmune diseases, remained unremarkable. Lamotrigine blood levels were within the target range. Kidney biopsy showed acute interstitial nephritis with tubular necrosis. Methylprednisolone pulse therapy led to an improvement in kidney function; skin eruption and neurological symptoms resolved. During the hospital stay, the girl admitted to inconsistent and variable intake of lamotrigine, occasionally resulting in notable overdosing. This report demonstrates that acute kidney injury in lamotrigine-induced DRESS syndrome is an acute interstitial nephritis with tubular necrosis, an aspect that has not been deeply characterized so far. Additionally, we aim to elevate awareness towards non-adherence as cause of disease, especially among the adolescent population.

Influence of UGT2B7, UGT1A4 and ABCG2 Polymorphisms on the Pharmacokinetics and Therapeutic Efficacy of Lamotrigine in Patients with Epilepsy.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A substantial inter-individual variability has been observed in the pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine. The aim of the study was to investigate the impact of genetic polymorphism of the metabolizing enzymes (UGT2B7, UGT1A4) and transporter (ABCG2) on the pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy of lamotrigine in patients with epilepsy. METHODS: The genetic analysis of single-nucleotide polymorphisms was conducted using polymerase chain reaction sequence. High-performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry was employed to measure the plasma concentrations of lamotrigine. The efficacy of lamotrigine was assessed by evaluating the reduction rate of epileptic seizure frequency. RESULTS: This study included a cohort of 331 patients who were treated with lamotrigine as monotherapy. A linear correlation was observed between the lamotrigine concentration and daily dose taken (r = 0.58, p < 2.2e-16). Statistically significant differences were found in both the median plasma concentration and dose-adjusted concentration (C/D ratio) when comparing the ineffective to the effective group (p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that UGT1A4 rs2011425, ABCG2 rs2231142 polymorphisms and age had a significant relationship with the lamotrigine concentrations (p < 0.05). Age was a predictive factor for C/D ratio (p < 0.001). Lamotrigine concentration and weight were good predictive factors for effective seizure outcomes (odds ratio [OR] = 0.715, 95% CI 0.658-0.776, p < 0.001; OR = 0.926, 95% CI 0.901-0.951, p < 0.001, respectively). The cut-off values of lamotrigine trough concentrations for clinical outcomes in the age-related groups were determined as 2.49 µg/ml (area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve [AUC]: 0.828, 95% CI 0.690-0.966), 2.70 µg/ml (AUC: 0.805, 95% CI 0.745-0.866) and 3.25 µg/ml (AUC: 0.807, 95% CI 0.686-0.928) for the adult group, adolescent group, and toddler and school-age group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: UGT1A4 rs2011425 and ABCG2 rs2231142 were correlated with lamotrigine concentrations. Lower lamotrigine trough concentration was found in the ineffective group and the troughs were associated with seizure outcomes.

The efficacy of lamotrigine in bipolar disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To provide up-to-date clinical guidance on the efficacy of lamotrigine in bipolar disorder (BD). METHODS: Eligible studies were identified during a systematic literature search according to PRISMA-guidelines. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies that quantitatively assessed lamotrigine's efficacy in BD. We divided the included studies into three groups: 1. acute treatment of depression, 2. acute treatment of mania and hypomania, and 3. maintenance treatment. Analyses were stratified by control group (placebo vs active comparator) and treatment strategy (monotherapy vs add-on treatment). RESULTS: We included 20 RCTs (n = 1166 lamotrigine users) and 20 cohort studies (n = 11,141 lamotrigine users). Twenty-four of these studies were included in meta-analyses. During depressive episodes, greater decreases in depressive symptomatology were associated with initiation of lamotrigine as add-on treatment than with placebo (SMD -0.30 [95% CI = -0.51, -0.10], df = 3, p = 0.004). Decreases in depressive symptomatology did not differ significantly between lamotrigine and the active comparator (SMD -0.28 [95% CI = -1.06, 0.50], df = 3, p = 0.488). As a maintenance treatment, lamotrigine was associated with a significantly lower relapse/recurrence rate than placebo (risk ratio (RR) 0.84 [95% CI = 0.71, 0.99], df = 2, p = 0.037). Relapse/recurrence rates did not differ significantly between lamotrigine and lithium (RR 1.06 [95% CI = 0.89, 1.25], df = 2, p = 0.513). A qualitative assessment of high-quality register-based studies found that lamotrigine was associated with lower hospital admission rates than other commonly used treatment regimes. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial evidence for the efficacy of lamotrigine in BD, specifically as add-on treatment during acute depressive episodes and as maintenance treatment for preventing relapse and recurrence.