Factors Related to Textbook Outcome in Laparoscopic Liver Resections: a Single Western Centre Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The selection of the most informative quality of care indicator for laparoscopic liver surgery (LLS) is still debated; among those proposed, textbook outcome (TO) seems to provide a compositive measure of the outcomes of surgery. The aim of this study was to investigate the factors related with the TO in a cohort of patients who underwent LLS. METHODS: Patients who underwent LLS from 2014 to 2021 were included. TO for LLS (TOLLS) was defined as: R0 resection, absence of intraoperative incidents, severe complications, reintervention, 30-day readmission and in-hospital mortality. When also considering no prolonged length of hospital stay (LOS), the outcome was called TOLLS+. RESULTS: Four hundred twenty-one patients were included; TOLLS was achieved in 80.5%, TOLLS+ in 60.8% cases. R0 resection was obtained in 90.2% cases, intraoperative incidents occurred in 7.8%, severe complications in 5.0%, reintervention in 0.7%, readmission in 1.4% and in-hospital mortality in 0.2%. 32.5% of patients showed prolonged LOS. After univariate and multivariate analysis, factors influencing TOLLS were age (OR 0.967; p=0.003), concomitant surgery (OR 0.380; p=0.003), operative time (OR 0.996; p=0.008) and blood loss (OR 0.241; p<0.001); factors influencing TOLLS+ were ASA-score (OR 0.533; p=0.008), tumour histology (OR 0.421; p=0.021), concomitant surgery (OR 0.293; p<0.001), operative time (OR 0.997; p=0.016) and blood loss (OR 0.361; p=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: TOLLS can be achieved in most patients undergoing LLR, and it seems to be influenced mostly by surgery-related factors; conversely, TOLLS+ is achieved less frequently and seems to be influenced also by patient- and tumour-related factors.

Methodology to standardize heterogeneous statistical data presentations for combining time-to-event oncologic outcomes.

Survival analysis following oncological treatments require specific analysis techniques to account for data considerations, such as failure to observe the time of event, patient withdrawal, loss to follow-up, and differential follow up. These techniques can include Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses. However, studies do not always report overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), or cancer recurrence using hazard ratios, making the synthesis of such oncologic outcomes difficult. We propose a hierarchical utilization of methods to extract or estimate the hazard ratio to standardize time-to-event outcomes so that study inclusion into meta-analyses can be maximized. We also provide proof-of concept results from a statistical analysis that compares OS, DFS, and cancer recurrence for robotic surgery to open and non-robotic minimally invasive surgery. In our example, use of the proposed methodology would allow for the increase in data inclusion from 108 hazard ratios reported to 240 hazard ratios reported or estimated, resulting in an increase of 122%. While there are publications summarizing the motivation for these analyses, and comprehensive papers describing strategies to obtain estimates from published time-dependent analyses, we are not aware of a manuscript that describes a prospective framework for an analysis of this scale focusing on the inclusion of a maximum number of publications reporting on long-term oncologic outcomes incorporating various presentations of statistical data.

Outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted fetoscopic laser photocoagulation for twin-twin transfusion syndrome: An established alternative for inaccessible anterior placenta.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate laparoscopy-assisted fetoscopic laser photocoagulation (FLPC) of placental anastomoses in the treatment of twin-to-twin-transfusion syndrome (TTTS). STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective cohort study analyzing pregnancies complicated by TTTS who underwent FLPC in a single university-affiliated tertiary medical-center. Outcomes were compared between patients who received laparoscopy-assisted FLPC (study group) and patients who underwent the conventional FLPC technique (control group). Baseline characteristics, sonographic findings, procedure details, and neonatal outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: The cohort included 278 women with 31 in the study group and 247 in the control group. Sonographic parameters, including fetal biometry and TTTS stage, were comparable between study groups. Gestational age at delivery did not differ between the groups (29.22 ± 4.55 weeks in the study group vs. 30.62 ± 4.3 weeks in the control group, p = 0.09). There were no differences in neonatal survival rates at birth and at 30 days between both groups. A subanalysis comparing the laparoscopy-assisted group to only those patients with anterior placenta in the control group, showed a lower rate of incomplete Solomonization in the laparoscopy-assisted study group (3.4% vs. 33%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopy-assisted FLPC is a reasonable and safe option that may be offered in cases of FLPC where an anterior placenta restricts adequate surgical access.

Intelligent Algorithm-Based Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Radical Gastrectomy under Laparoscope.

The study focused on the influence of intelligent algorithm-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on short-term curative effects of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer. A convolutional neural network- (CNN-) based algorithm was used to segment MRI images of patients with gastric cancer, and 158 subjects admitted at hospital were selected as research subjects and randomly divided into the 3D laparoscopy group and 2D laparoscopy group, with 79 cases in each group. The two groups were compared for operation time, intraoperative blood loss, number of dissected lymph nodes, exhaust time, time to get out of bed, postoperative hospital stay, and postoperative complications. The results showed that the CNN-based algorithm had high accuracy with clear contours. The similarity coefficient (DSC) was 0.89, the sensitivity was 0.93, and the average time to process an image was 1.1 min. The 3D laparoscopic group had shorter operation time (86.3 ± 21.0 min vs. 98 ± 23.3 min) and less intraoperative blood loss (200 ± 27.6 mL vs. 209 ± 29.8 mL) than the 2D laparoscopic group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The number of dissected lymph nodes was 38.4 ± 8.5 in the 3D group and 36.1 ± 6.0 in the 2D group, showing no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). At the same time, no statistically significant difference was noted in postoperative exhaust time, time to get out of bed, postoperative hospital stay, and the incidence of complications (P > 0.05). It was concluded that the algorithm in this study can accurately segment the target area, providing a basis for the preoperative examination of gastric cancer, and that 3D laparoscopic surgery can shorten the operation time and reduce intraoperative bleeding, while achieving similar short-term curative effects to 2D laparoscopy.

Development and Validation of a 3-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network for Automatic Surgical Skill Assessment Based on Spatiotemporal Video Analysis.

Importance: A high level of surgical skill is essential to prevent intraoperative problems. One important aspect of surgical education is surgical skill assessment, with pertinent feedback facilitating efficient skill acquisition by novices. Objectives: To develop a 3-dimensional (3-D) convolutional neural network (CNN) model for automatic surgical skill assessment and to evaluate the performance of the model in classification tasks by using laparoscopic colorectal surgical videos. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prognostic study used surgical videos acquired prior to 2017. In total, 650 laparoscopic colorectal surgical videos were provided for study purposes by the Japan Society for Endoscopic Surgery, and 74 were randomly extracted. Every video had highly reliable scores based on the Endoscopic Surgical Skill Qualification System (ESSQS, range 1-100, with higher scores indicating greater surgical skill) established by the society. Data were analyzed June to December 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: From the groups with scores less than the difference between the mean and 2 SDs, within the range spanning the mean and 1 SD, and greater than the sum of the mean and 2 SDs, 17, 26, and 31 videos, respectively, were randomly extracted. In total, 1480 video clips with a length of 40 seconds each were extracted for each surgical step (medial mobilization, lateral mobilization, inferior mesenteric artery transection, and mesorectal transection) and separated into 1184 training sets and 296 test sets. Automatic surgical skill classification was performed based on spatiotemporal video analysis using the fully automated 3-D CNN model, and classification accuracies and screening accuracies for the groups with scores less than the mean minus 2 SDs and greater than the mean plus 2 SDs were calculated. Results: The mean (SD) ESSQS score of all 650 intraoperative videos was 66.2 (8.6) points and for the 74 videos used in the study, 67.6 (16.1) points. The proposed 3-D CNN model automatically classified video clips into groups with scores less than the mean minus 2 SDs, within 1 SD of the mean, and greater than the mean plus 2 SDs with a mean (SD) accuracy of 75.0% (6.3%). The highest accuracy was 83.8% for the inferior mesenteric artery transection. The model also screened for the group with scores less than the mean minus 2 SDs with 94.1% sensitivity and 96.5% specificity and for group with greater than the mean plus 2 SDs with 87.1% sensitivity and 86.0% specificity. Conclusions and Relevance: The results of this prognostic study showed that the proposed 3-D CNN model classified laparoscopic colorectal surgical videos with sufficient accuracy to be used for screening groups with scores greater than the mean plus 2 SDs and less than the mean minus 2 SDs. The proposed approach was fully automatic and easy to use for various types of surgery, and no special annotations or kinetics data extraction were required, indicating that this approach warrants further development for application to automatic surgical skill assessment.

Defining Global Benchmarks in Elective Secondary Bariatric Surgery Comprising Conversional, Revisional, and Reversal Procedures.

OBJECTIVE: To define "best possible" outcomes for secondary bariatric surgery (BS). BACKGROUND: Management of poor response and of long-term complications after BS is complex and under-investigated. Indications and types of reoperations vary widely and postoperative complication rates are higher compared to primary BS. METHODS: Out of 44,884 BS performed in 18 high-volume centers from 4 continents between 06/2013-05/2019, 5,349 (12%) secondary BS cases were identified. Twenty-one outcome benchmarks were established in low-risk patients, defined as the 75th percentile of the median outcome values of centers. Benchmark cases had no previous laparotomy, diabetes, sleep apnea, cardiopathy, renal insufficiency, inflammatory bowel disease, immunosuppression, thromboembolic events, BMI> 50 kg/m2 or age> 65 years. RESULTS: The benchmark cohort included 3143 cases, mainly females (85%), aged 43.8 ±â€Š10 years, 8.4 ±â€Š5.3 years after primary BS, with a BMI 35.2 ±â€Š7 kg/m2. Main indications were insufficient weight loss (43%) and gastro-esophageal reflux disease/dysphagia (25%). 90-days postoperatively, 14.6% of benchmark patients presented ≥1 complication, mortality was 0.06% (n = 2). Significantly higher morbidity was observed in non-benchmark cases (OR 1.37) and after conversional/reversal or revisional procedures with gastrointestinal suture/stapling (OR 1.84). Benchmark cutoffs for conversional BS were ≤4.5% re-intervention, ≤8.3% re-operation 90-days postoperatively. At 2-years (IQR 1-3) 15.6% of benchmark patients required a reoperation. CONCLUSION: Secondary BS is safe, although postoperative morbidity exceeds the established benchmarks for primary BS. The excess morbidity is due to an increased risk of gastrointestinal leakage and higher need for intensive care. The considerable rate of tertiary BS warrants expertise and future research to optimize the management of non-success after BS.

Comparison of clinical efficacy of robotic right colectomy and laparoscopic right colectomy for right colon tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical efficacy of robotic right colectomy (RRC) and laparoscopic right colectomy (LRC) in the treatment of right colon tumor. METHODS: We systematically searched PubMed, Web of science, EMBASE ClinicalTrials.gov and Cochrane Central Register for studies (studies published between January 2011 and June 2020). The included studies compared the clinical efficacy of RRC and LRC in the treatment of right colon tumor, and analyzed the perioperative data. RESULTS: Our meta-analysis included 10 studies involving 1180 patients who underwent 2 surgical procedures, RRC and LRC. This study showed that compared with LRC, there was no significant difference in first flatus passage (weighted mean difference [WMD]: -0.37, 95% CI: -1.09-0.36, P = .32), hospital length of stay (WMD: -0.23, 95% CI: -0.73-0.28, P = .32), reoperation (OR: 1.66, 95% CI: 0.67-4.10, P = .27), complication (OR: 0.83, 95% CI: 0.60-1.14, P = .25), mortality (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.02-11.22, P = .63), wound infection (OR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.34-1.25, P = .20), and anastomotic leak (OR: 0.73, 95% CI: 0.33-1.63, P = .44). This study showed that compared with LRC, the lymph nodes retrieved (WMD: 1.47, 95% CI: -0.00-2.94, P = .05) of RRC were similar, with slight advantages, and resulted in longer operative time (WMD: 65.20, 95% CI: 53.40-77.01, P < .00001), less estimated blood loss (WMD: -13.43, 95% CI: -20.65-6.21, P = .0003), and less conversion to open surgery (OR: 0.30, 95% CI: 0.17-0.54, P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: RRC is equivalent to LRC with respect to first flatus passage, hospital length of stay, reoperation, complication, and results in less conversion to LRC.

Robotic Complex Fundoplication in Patients at High-Risk to Fail.

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to analyze our outcomes after robotic fundoplication for GERD in patients with failed antireflux procedures, with type IV (i.e., giant) hiatal hernias, or after extensive intra-abdominal surgery with mesh, and to compare our results to outcomes predicted by the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Surgical Risk Calculator and to national outcomes reported by NSQIP. METHODS: 100 patients undergoing robotic fundoplication for the aforementioned factors were prospectively followed. RESULTS: 100 patients, aged 67 (67 ± 10.3) years with body mass index (BMI) of 26 (25 ± 2.9) kg/m2 underwent robotic fundoplication for failed antireflux fundoplications (43%), type IV hiatal hernias (31%), or after extensive intra-abdominal surgery with mesh (26%). Operative duration was 184 (196 ± 74.3) min with an estimated blood loss of 24 (51 ± 82.9) mL. Length of stay was 1 (2 ± 3.6) day. Two patients developed postoperative ileus. Two patients were readmitted within 30 days for nausea.Nationally reported outcomes and those predicted by NSQIP were similar. When comparing our actual outcomes to predicted and national NSQIP outcomes, actual outcomes were superior for serious complications, any complications, pneumonia, surgical site infection, deep vein thrombosis, readmission, return to OR, and sepsis (P < 0.05); our actual outcomes were not worse for renal failure, deaths, cardiac complications, and discharge to a nursing facility. CONCLUSIONS: Our patients were not a selective group; rather they were more complex than reported in NSQIP. Most of our results after robotic fundoplication were superior to predicted and national outcomes. The utilization of the robotic platform for complex operations and fundoplications to treat patients with GERD is safe and efficacious.

Assessment of technical skills based on learning curve analyses in laparoscopic surgery training.

BACKGROUND: Objective force- and motion-based assessment is currently lacking in laparoscopic skills curricula. This study aimed to evaluate the added value of parameter-based assessment and feedback during training. METHODS: Laparoscopy-naïve surgical residents that took part in a 3-week skills training curriculum were included. A box trainer equipped with the ForceSense system was used for assessment of tissue manipulation- (MaxForce) and instrument-handling skills (Path length and Time). Learning curves were established using linear regression tests. Pre- and post-course comparisons indicated the overall progression and were compared to predefined proficiency levels. A post-course survey was carried out to assess face validity. RESULTS: In total, 4,268 trials, executed by 24 residents, were successfully assessed. Median (interquartile range) MaxForce outcomes improved from 2.7 Newton (interquartile range 1.9-3.8) to 1.8 Newton (interquartile range 1.2-2.4) between pre- and post-course assessment (P ≤ .009). Instrument Path length improved from 7,102.2 mm (interquartile range 5,255.2-9,025.9) to 3,545.3 mm (interquartile range 2,842.9-4,563.2) (P ≤.001). Time to execute the task improved from 159.8 seconds (interquartile range 119.8-219.0) to 60.7 seconds (interquartile range 46.0-79.5) (P ≤ .001). The learning curves revealed during what training phase the proficiency benchmarks were reached for each trainee. In the survey outcomes, trainees indicated that this curriculum should be part of a surgical residency program (mean visual analog scale score of 9.2 ± 0.9 standard deviation). CONCLUSION: Force-, motion-, and time-parameters can be objectively measured during basic laparoscopic skills curricula and do indicate progression of skills over time. The ForceSense parameters enable curricula to be designed for specific proficiency-based training goals and offer the possibility for objective classification of the levels of expertise.

Assessment of Textbook Outcome in Laparoscopic and Open Liver Surgery.

Importance: Textbook outcome (TO) is a composite measure that captures the most desirable surgical outcomes as a single indicator, yet to date TO has not been defined and assessed in the field of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) and open liver resection (OLR). Objective: To obtain international agreement on the definition of TO in liver surgery (TOLS) and to assess the incidence of TO in LLR and OLR in a large international multicenter database using a propensity-score matched analysis. Design, Setting, and Participants: Patients undergoing LLR or OLR for all liver diseases between January 2011 and October 2019 were analyzed using a large international multicenter liver surgical database. An international survey was conducted among all members of the European-African Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (E-AHPBA) and International Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (IHPBA) to reach agreement on the definition of TOLS. The rate of TOLS was assessed for LLR and OLR before and after propensity-score matching. Factors associated with achieving TOLS were investigated. Main Outcomes and Measures: Textbook outcome, with TOLS defined as the absence of intraoperative incidents of grade 2 or higher, postoperative bile leak grade B or C, severe postoperative complications, readmission within 30 days after discharge, in-hospital mortality, and the presence of R0 resection margin. Results: A total of 8188 patients (4559 LLR; median age, 65 years [interquartile range, 55-73 years]; 2529 were male [55.8%] and 3629 OLR; median age, 64 years [interquartile range, 56-71 years]; 2204 were male [60.7%]) were included in the analysis of whom 69.1% achieved TOLS; 74.8% for LLR and 61.9% for OLR (P < .001). On multivariable analysis, American Society of Anesthesiologists grade III, previous abdominal surgery, histological diagnosis of colorectal liver metastases (odds ratio [OR], 0.656 [95% CI, 0.457-0.940]; P = .02), cholangiocarcinoma, non-CRLM, a tumor size of 30 mm or more, minor resection of posterior/superior segments (OR, 0.716 [95% CI, 0.577-0.887]; P = .002), anatomically major resection (OR, 0.579 [95% CI, 0.418-0.803]; P = .001), and nonanatomical resection (OR, 0.612 [95% CI, 0.476-0.788]; P < .001) were associated with a worse TOLS rate after LLR. For OLR, only histological diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma (OR, 0.360 [95% CI, 0.214-0.607]; P < .001) and a tumor size of 30 mm or more (30-50 mm = OR, 0.718 [95% CI, 0.565-0.911]; P = .01; 50.1-100 mm = OR, 0.729 [95% CI, 0.554-0.960]; P = .02; >10 cm = OR, 0.550 [95% CI, 0.366-0.826]; P = .004) were associated with a worse TOLS rate. Conclusions and Relevance: In this multicenter study, TOLS was found to be a useful tool for assessing patient-level hospital performance and may have utility in optimizing patient outcomes after LLR and OLR.

Accreditation as a qualified surgeon improves surgical outcomes in laparoscopic distal gastrectomy.

PURPOSE: The Endoscopic Surgical Skill Quantification System for qualified surgeons (QSs) was introduced in Japan to improve surgical outcomes. This study reviewed the surgical outcomes after initial experience performing laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) and evaluated the improvement in surgical outcomes following accreditation as a QS. METHODS: Eighty-seven consecutive patients who underwent LDG for gastric cancer by a single surgeon were enrolled in this study. The cumulative sum method was used to analyze the learning curve for LDG. The surgical outcomes were evaluated according to the two phases of the learning curve (learning period vs. mastery period) and accreditation (non-QS period vs. QS period). RESULTS: The learning period for LDG was 48 cases. Accreditation was approved at the 67th case. The operation time and estimated blood loss were significantly reduced in the QS period compared to the non-QS period (230 vs. 270 min, p < 0.001; 20.5 vs. 59.8 ml, p = 0.024, respectively). Furthermore, the major complication rate was significantly lower in the QS period than in the non-QS period (0 vs. 10.6%, p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: Experience performing approximately 50 cases is required to reach proficiency in LDG. After receiving accreditation as a QS, the surgical outcomes, including the complication rate, were improved.

Standardization and experience may influence the survival of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy has been shown to be associated with poorer outcome in an influential prospective, randomized trial. However, many centers worldwide performing minimally invasive radical hysterectomy have data and experience that prove otherwise. We aim to review surgical and oncologic outcomes of patients operated by Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in a tertiary hospital, by experienced surgeons and standardization in radicality, for cervical carcinoma Stage 1A1-1B1 from January 2009 to May 2014. MATERIALS & METHODS: Standardised surgical technique with Parametrium & Paracolpium resection approach was adopted by qualified and experienced Gynecologic/Gyne-Oncologic Endoscopic & Minimally Invasive Surgeons in performing Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer stage 1A1-1B1 from January 2009-May 2014, involving 53 patients. Electronic Medical Record system (EMR) Of Chang Gung Memorial Hospital(Tertiary Referral Centre), Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology was accessed for surgical and oncologic outcomes. RESULTS: Fifty-Three patients operated from January 2009 to May 2014 were followed up for an average of 96.7 months with longest follow-up at 127 months. There were no cases of recurrence or death reported. 5 Year - Survival Rate and 5 Year Disease-Free Survival Rate were 100%. Two patients received post-operative pelvic radiation concurrent with chemotherapy using Cisplatin due to greater than 1/3 cervical stromal invasion. CONCLUSION: It is vital to standardize minimally invasive surgical techniques for early stage cervical cancer, with focus on adequate radicality and resection which may contribute to excellent survival outcomes. Further international multi-center randomized trial (Minimally Invasive Therapy Versus Open Radical Hysterectomy In Cervical Cancer) will provide justification for continued practice of MIS in early stage cervical cancer.

Comparative outcomes of needlescopic, single-incision laparoscopic, standard laparoscopic, mini-laparotomy, and open cholecystectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis of 96 randomized controlled trials with 11,083 patients.

BACKGROUND: Most randomized trials on minimally invasive cholecystectomy have been conducted with standard (3/4-port) laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy serving as the control group. However, there exists a dearth of head-to-head trials that directly compare different minimally invasive techniques for cholecystectomy (eg, single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus needlescopic cholecystectomy). Hence, it remains largely unknown how the different minimally invasive cholecystectomy techniques fare up against one another. METHODS: To minimize selection and confounding biases, only randomized controlled trials were considered for inclusion. Perioperative outcomes were compared using frequentist network meta-analyses. The interpretation of the results was driven by treatment effects and surface under the cumulative ranking curve values. A sensitivity analysis was also undertaken focusing on a subgroup of randomized controlled trials, which recruited patients with only uncomplicated cholecystitis. RESULTS: Ninety-six eligible randomized controlled trials comprising 11,083 patients were identified. Risk of intra-abdominal infection or abscess, bile duct injury, bile leak, and open conversion did not differ significantly between minimally invasive techniques. Needlescopic cholecystectomy was associated with the lowest rates of wound infection (surface under the cumulative ranking curve value = 0.977) with an odds ratio of 0.095 (95% confidence interval: 0.023-0.39), 0.32 (95% confidence interval: 0.11-0.98), 0.33 (95% confidence interval: 0.11-0.99), 0.36 (95% confidence interval: 0.14-0.98) compared to open cholecystectomy, single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy, mini-laparotomy, and standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy, respectively. Mini-laparotomy was associated with the shortest operative time (surface under the cumulative ranking curve value = 0.981) by a mean difference of 22.20 (95% confidence interval: 13.79-30.62), 12.17 (95% confidence interval: 1.80-22.54), 9.07 (95% confidence interval: 1.59-16.54), and 8.36 (95% confidence interval: -1.79 to 18.52) minutes when compared to single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy, needlescopic cholecystectomy, standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and open cholecystectomy, respectively. Needlescopic cholecystectomy appeared to be associated with the shortest hospitalization (surface under the cumulative ranking curve value = 0.717) and lowest postoperative pain (surface under the cumulative ranking curve value = 0.928). CONCLUSION: Perioperative outcomes differed across minimally invasive techniques and, in some instances, afforded superior outcomes compared to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy. These findings suggest that there may be equipoise for exploring further the utility of novel minimally invasive techniques and potentially incorporating them into the general surgery training curriculum.

Analysis of the operative factors related to anal exhaust time after laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecological diseases.

PURPOSE: The study seeks to determine surgical factors related to anal exhaust in patients treated with laparoscopic surgery for benign gynecological diseases and to explore measures that effectively promote the rapid recovery of intestinal function in these patients. METHODS: From June 2017 to August 2018, 155 patients with benign gynecological diseases who underwent laparoscopic surgery in our hospital were selected as study subjects. Patients were divided into two groups based on anal exhaust time: the ≤ 24-hour group and > 24-hour group. Factors related to the operation were statistically analyzed for all patients. Chi-squared tests and logistic regression were used for univariate and multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Of 155 gynecological patients, 57 (36.8%) underwent laparoscopic ovarian cyst stripping, 48 (30.9%) underwent laparoscopic salpingectomy with/without oophorectomy, and 50 (32.3%) underwent laparoscopic myomectomy. Among all patients, 62 (40.0%) and 93 (60.0%) had anal exhaust within and after 24 h, respectively. Univariate analysis results revealed differences in the operation method (P = 0.040), intraoperative blood loss (P = 0.037), operation duration (P = 0.007), whether an abdominal drainage tube was placed (P = 0.012) and whether warm saline was used (37 °C) for abdominal washing (P = 0.013) between groups. Logistic regression analysis showed that the duration of the operation (P = 0.027) and whether warm saline was used for abdominal washing (P = 0.040) were the main factors affecting anal exhaust time. CONCLUSION: During laparoscopy for patients with benign gynecological diseases, abdominal washing with warm water is an important factor that promotes early postoperative anal exhaust and is worthy of use in clinical practice.

Patterns of voiding following laparoscopic hysterectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Clarify the normal patterns of voiding after minimally invasive hysterectomy. We also aim to identify perioperative factors associated with delayed time to void immediately following hysterectomy. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study SELECTION: Women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy between September 2012 to October 2018 at a single academic university hospital. RESULTS: 450 minimally invasive hysterectomies were included in the final analysis, 274 (60.9%) robotically-assisted, and 176 (39.1%) conventional laparoscopy. The overall median postoperative time-to-void following a retrograde bladder filling of 150 mL normal saline was 179 min. Based on the 50th percentile of the distribution of the time-to-void, two groups were created. Demographic characteristics between the groups were similar, except those who were above the 50th percentile were more likely to be older, have a reported history of previous myomectomy, and had a longer postoperative PACU stay compared to those below or equal to the 50th percentile. The mean time-to-void following conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy was less than that of robotic surgery (187.3 vs 200.5 min) however the difference was not statistically significant (p=.22). The use of hydromorphone intraoperatively and the combination of oxycodone-acetaminophen postoperatively were more likely to be associated with the group of patients above the 50th percentile but there was no significant difference in perioperative utilization of median morphine milliequivalents (MME) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Following laparoscopic hysterectomy (either conventional or with robotic-assistance) with a retrograde bladder fill of 150 mL normal saline most patients will void within 4 h after surgery. This is consistent with historic data on normal voiding patterns facilitating safe same day discharge without prolonged time in the PACU.

The management of surgical patients in the emergency setting during COVID-19 pandemic: the WSES position paper.

BACKGROUND: Since the COVID-19 pandemic has occurred, nations showed their unpreparedness to deal with a mass casualty incident of this proportion and severity, which resulted in a tremendous number of deaths even among healthcare workers. The World Society of Emergency Surgery conceived this position paper with the purpose of providing evidence-based recommendations for the management of emergency surgical patients under COVID-19 pandemic for the safety of the patient and healthcare workers. METHOD: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols (PRISMA-P) through the MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase and SCOPUS databases. Synthesis of evidence, statements and recommendations were developed in accordance with the GRADE methodology. RESULTS: Given the limitation of the evidence, the current document represents an effort to join selected high-quality articles and experts' opinion. CONCLUSIONS: The aim of this position paper is to provide an exhaustive guidelines to perform emergency surgery in a safe and protected environment for surgical patients and for healthcare workers under COVID-19 and to offer the best management of COVID-19 patients needing for an emergency surgical treatment. We recommend screening for COVID-19 infection at the emergency department all acute surgical patients who are waiting for hospital admission and urgent surgery. The screening work-up provides a RT-PCR nasopharyngeal swab test and a baseline (non-contrast) chest CT or a chest X-ray or a lungs US, depending on skills and availability. If the COVID-19 screening is not completed we recommend keeping the patient in isolation until RT-PCR swab test result is not available, and to manage him/she such as an overt COVID patient. The management of COVID-19 surgical patients is multidisciplinary. If an immediate surgical procedure is mandatory, whether laparoscopic or via open approach, we recommend doing every effort to protect the operating room staff for the safety of the patient.

Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass: Still the Gold Standard?

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass has been considered the gold standard bariatric procedure for decades. The surgical technique for Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and perioperative management for patients who undergo the procedure are still being improved for better clinical outcomes, shorter hospitalization, and faster return to normal activity. In the past 15 years there have been similar improvements and further development of novel surgical weight loss procedures. As data on other surgical alternatives emerge, the data need to be compared with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass to determine noninferiority. Further long-term investigations are needed to determine superiority of one bariatric procedure over another.