Less-lethal law enforcement weapons: clinical management of associated injuries in the emergency department.

Less-lethal weapons and tactics are being increasingly used by law enforcement to minimize the reliance on more-lethal force. While these methods are designated as "less-lethal," they can cause morbidity and mortality when deployed. Knowledge of these weapons and tactics can help direct the workup and management of patients with injuries from these methods and can protect clinicians from secondary exposure and injuries. This issue reviews the most common less-lethal weapons and tactics used by law enforcement, describes their mechanism of action, and discusses associated common injury patterns. Recommendations are provided for the evaluation and management of these patients in the emergency department.

[Tasered: medical consequences of the use of electric stun guns]. / Getaserd.

The Electronic Control Device (ECD) will be used by the primary police force in the Netherlands. Hence medical personnel will be confronted with persons that have received ECD shocks more often. In light of these developments, it is important that care providers are aware of potential medical consequences resulting from the use of electric stun guns. The darts usually result in minor injury with small penetration wounds requiring minimal treatment. However, in vulnerable areas, such as the eyes, the darts can cause serious injury and specialist care is indicated. The electric shock causes muscle contractions, potentially resulting in traumatic falls, or fractures. Cardiac problems occur only in exceptional cases; risk factors include long duration of the power surge, short distance from the darts to the heart and underlying heart problems. In rare cases a pneumothorax may occur. Finally, often there are underlying medical problems requiring appropriate treatment such as drug intoxication, excited delirium or psychiatric disorders. Systematic recording of the medical problems caused by anECD is indicated.

Emergency Department Evaluation After Conducted Energy Weapon Use: Review of the Literature for the Clinician.

BACKGROUND: Conductive energy weapons (CEWs) are used daily by law enforcement, and patients are often brought to emergency departments (EDs) for medical clearance. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to review the medical literature on the topic of CEWs and to offer evidence-based recommendations to emergency physicians for evaluation and treatment of patients who have received a CEW exposure. METHODS: A MEDLINE literature search from 1988 to 2018 was performed and limited to human studies published from January 1, 1988 to November 1, 2018 written in English with the following keywords: TASER, conductive energy device(s), electronic weapon(s), conductive energy weapon(s), non-lethal weapon(s), conducted energy device(s), conducted energy weapon(s), conductive electronic device(s), and electronic control device(s). Studies identified then underwent a structured review from which results could be evaluated. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-three articles on CEWs were screened and 37 appropriate articles were rigorously reviewed. Evaluation and treatment recommendations are presented. These studies did not report any evidence of dangerous laboratory abnormalities, physiologic changes, or immediate or delayed cardiac ischemia or dysrhythmias after exposure to CEW electrical discharges of up to 15 s. CONCLUSIONS: The current medical literature does not support routine performance of laboratory studies, electrocardiography, or prolonged ED observation or hospitalization for ongoing cardiac monitoring after CEW exposure in an otherwise asymptomatic awake and alert patient.