Chronic neutrophilic leukemia and atypical chronic myeloid leukemia: 2024 update on diagnosis, genetics, risk stratification, and management.

Chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) is a rare BCR::ABL1-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) defined by persistent mature neutrophilic leukocytosis and bone marrow granulocyte hyperplasia. Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) (myelodysplastic "[MDS]/MPN with neutrophilia" per World Health Organization [WHO]) is a MDS/MPN overlap disorder featuring dysplastic neutrophilia and circulating myeloid precursors. Both manifest with frequent hepatosplenomegaly and less commonly, bleeding, with high rates of leukemic transformation and death. The 2022 revised WHO classification conserved CNL diagnostic criteria of leukocytosis ≥25 × 109/L, neutrophils ≥80% with <10% circulating precursors, absence of dysplasia, and presence of an activating CSF3R mutation. ICC criteria are harmonized with those of other myeloid entities, with a key distinction being lower leukocytosis threshold (≥13 × 109/L) for cases CSF3R-mutated. Criteria for aCML include leukocytosis ≥13 × 109/L, dysgranulopoiesis, circulating myeloid precursors ≥10%, and at least one cytopenia for MDS-thresholds (ICC). In both classifications ASXL1 and SETBP1 (ICC), or SETBP1 ± ETNK1 (WHO) mutations can be used to support the diagnosis. Both diseases show hypercellular bone marrow due to a granulocytic proliferation, aCML distinguished by dysplasia in granulocytes ± other lineages. Absence of monocytosis, rare/no basophilia, or eosinophilia, <20% blasts, and exclusion of other MPN, MDS/MPN, and tyrosine kinase fusions, are mandated. Cytogenetic abnormalities are identified in ~1/3 of CNL and ~15-40% of aCML patients. The molecular signature of CNL is a driver mutation in colony-stimulating factor 3 receptor-classically T618I, documented in >80% of cases. Atypical CML harbors a complex genomic backdrop with high rates of recurrent somatic mutations in ASXL1, SETBP1, TET2, SRSF2, EZH2, and less frequently in ETNK1. Leukemic transformation rates are ~10-25% and 30-40% for CNL and aCML, respectively. Overall survival is poor: 15-31 months in CNL and 12-20 months in aCML. The Mayo Clinic CNL risk model for survival stratifies patients according to platelets <160 × 109/L (2 points), leukocytes >60 × 109/L (1 point), and ASXL1 mutation (1 point); distinguishing low- (0-1 points) versus high-risk (2-4 points) categories. The Mayo Clinic aCML risk model attributes 1 point each for: age >67 years, hemoglobin <10 g/dL, and TET2 mutation, delineating low- (0-1 risk factor) and high-risk (≥2 risk factors) subgroups. Management is risk-driven and symptom-directed, with no current standard of care. Most commonly used agents include hydroxyurea, interferon, Janus kinase inhibitors, and hypomethylating agents, though none are disease-modifying. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant is the only potentially curative modality and should be considered in eligible patients. Recent genetic profiling has disclosed CBL, CEBPA, EZH2, NRAS, TET2, and U2AF1 to represent high-risk mutations in both entities. Actionable mutations (NRAS/KRAS, ETNK1) have also been identified, supporting novel agents targeting involved pathways. Preclinical and clinical studies evaluating new drugs (e.g., fedratinib, phase 2) and combinations are detailed.

Atypical CML: diagnosis and treatment.

Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) is included in the group of myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms by the International Consensus Classification and has been renamed as MDS/MPN with neutrophilia by the fifth edition of World Health Organization classification. It is always characterized by morphologic identification of granulocytic dysplasia with >10% circulating immature myeloid cells, 2 distinguished features that differentiate this disease among the others. Somatic mutations may help to diagnose but are not specifically pathognomonic of the disease, with the most detected including ASXL1, SETBP1, NRAS, KRAS, SRSF2, and TET2 and with low-frequency CBL, CSF3R, JAK2, and ETNK1. The genomic landscape of aCML has been recently unravelling, revealing that SETBP1 and ETNK1 are usually not ancestral but secondary events associated with disease progression. Unfortunately, until now, no consensus on risk stratification and treatment has been developed: Mayo Clinic prognostic score identified as adverse events age >67 years, hemoglobin level <10  g/dL, and TET2 mutations. Although some possible genetic markers have been identified, allogeneic transplant remains the only curative strategy.

Characteristics, primary treatment, and survival of MDS/MPN with neutrophilia: a population-based study.

Myelodysplastic and myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) with neutrophilia, until recently called atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML), being part of the MDS/MPN is a very rare disease with poor prognosis. Although emerging data reveal its cytogenetic and molecular profile, integrated survival and treatment data remain scarce. We analyzed a cohort of 347 adult patients diagnosed with MDS/MPN with neutrophilia, registered in the Netherlands Cancer Registry between 2001 and 2019. Our demographic baseline data align with other cohorts. We observed cytogenetic aberrations exclusively in patients aged >65 years, with trisomy 8 being the most common abnormality. We identified 16 distinct molecular mutations, with some patients (16/101) harboring up to 3 different mutations; ASXL1 being the most frequent one (22%). In a multivariable Cox regression analysis, only age, hemoglobin level and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (alloHSCT) were associated with overall survival (aged >65 years; hazard ratio [HR] 1.85; P = .001 and alloHSCT HR, 0.51; P = .039). Because no other treatment modality seemed to affect survival and might cause toxicity, we propose that all patients eligible for alloHSCT should, whenever possible, receive an allogeneic transplant. It is imperative that we strive to improve outcomes for patients who are not eligible for alloHSCT. Tackling this challenge requires international collaborative efforts to conduct prospective intervention studies.

Molecular genetics and management of world health organization defined atypical chronic myeloid leukemia.

Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a rare BCR::ABL1-negative hematopoietic stem cell disease characterized by granulocytic proliferation and granulocytic dysplasia. Due to both the challenging diagnosis and the rarity of atypical CML, comprehensive molecular annotation-based analyses of this disease population have been scarce, and it is currently difficult to identify the optimal treatment for atypical CML. To explore atypical CML genomic landscape and treatment options, we performed a systematic retrospective of the clinical data and outcomes of 31 atypical CML patients. We observed that the molecular landscape of atypical CML was highly heterogeneous, with multiple molecular events driving its pathogenesis. Patients with atypical CML had a low response to current therapies, with an overall response rate (ORR) of 33.3% to hypomethylating agent (HMA)-based therapy. The current treatment strategies, including hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), did not improve overall survival (OS) in atypical CML patients, with a median survival of 20 months. Thus, the benefits from HSCT and candidates for HSCT remain to be further evaluated. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML)-like chemotherapy followed by bridging allogeneic HSCT may be an ideal regimen for suitable individuals. The large-scale and prospective clinical studies will help to address the dilemma.

Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm, not otherwise specified: 2023 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.

DISEASE OVERVIEW: Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) and myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative (MDS/MPN) neoplasms, not otherwise specified (NOS), are MDS/MPN overlap neoplasms characterized by leukocytosis, in the absence of monocytosis and eosinophilia, with <20% blasts in the blood and bone marrow. DIAGNOSIS: aCML, previously known as aCML, BCR::ABL1 negative, was renamed as aCML by the ICC classification, and as MDS/MPN with neutrophilia by the 5th edition of the WHO classification. This entity is characterized by dysplastic neutrophilia with immature myeloid cells comprising ≥10% of the white blood cell count, with prominent dysgranulopoiesis. MDS/MPN-NOS consists of MDS/MPN overlap neoplasms not meeting criteria for defined categories such as chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML), MDS/MPN-ring sideroblasts-thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T), and aCML. MUTATIONS AND KARYOTYPE: Cytogenetic abnormalities are seen in 40-50% of patients in both categories. In aCML, somatic mutations commonly encountered include ASXL1, SETBP1, ETNK1, and EZH2 whereas MDS/MPN-NOS can be further stratified by mutational profiles into CMML-like, MDS/MPN-RS-T-like, aCML-like, TP35-mutated, and "others", respectively. RISK STRATIFICATION: The Mayo Clinic aCML model stratifies patients based on age >67 years, hemoglobin <10 g/dl, and the presence of TET2 mutations into low-risk (0-1 points) and high-risk (>2 points) groups, with median survivals of 18 and 7 months, respectively. MDS/MPN-NOS patients have traditionally been risk stratified using MDS risk models such as IPSS and IPSS-R. TREATMENT: Leukocytosis and anemia are managed like lower risk MPN and MDS. DNMT inhibitors have been used in both entities with suboptimal response rates. Allogeneic stem cell transplant remains the only curative strategy but is associated with high morbidity and mortality.

Philadelphia-Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Around the COVID-19 Pandemic.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with a high rate of respiratory failure, thromboembolism, bleeding, and death. Patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are prone to both thrombosis and bleeding, calling for special care during COVID-19. We reviewed the clinical features of MPN patients with COVID-19, suggesting guidance for treatment. RECENT FINDINGS: One study by the European LeukemiaNet collected 175 MPN patients with COVID-19 during the first wave of the pandemic, from February to May 2020. Patients with primary myelofibrosis (PMF) were at higher risk of mortality (48%) in comparison with essential thrombocythemia (ET) (25%) and polycythemia vera (19%); the risk of death was higher in those patients who abruptly discontinued ruxolitinib. In patients followed at home, in regular wards, or in ICU, the thrombosis rate was 1.0%, 2.8%, and 18.4%, respectively. Independent risk factors for thrombosis were ET phenotype, transfer to ICU, and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio; major bleeding occurred in 4.3% of patients, particularly those with PMF. MPN patients with non-severe COVID-19 treated at home should continue their primary or secondary antithrombotic prophylaxis with aspirin or oral anticoagulants. In the case of hospitalization, patients assuming aspirin should add low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) at standard doses. In contrast, LMWH at intermediate/therapeutic doses should replace oral anticoagulants prescribed for atrial fibrillation or previous venous thromboembolism. Intermediate/high doses of LMWH can also be considered in ICU patients with ET, particularly in the case of a rapid decline in the number of platelets and progressive respiratory failure.

Correlation analysis of long non-coding RNA TUG1 with disease risk, clinical characteristics, treatment response, and survival profiles of adult Ph- Acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

BACKGROUND: Long non-coding RNA taurine-upregulated gene 1 (lncRNA TUG1) is reported to be involved in the progression and development of several malignancies; however, its role in Philadelphia chromosome-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph- ALL) is unknown. The present study aimed to explore the correlation of lncRNA TUG1 with disease risk, disease condition, and prognosis of adult Ph- ALL. METHODS: Total 101 adult Ph- ALL patients and 40 bone marrow (BM) donors were included, followed by detection of BM monocyte cell lncRNA TUG1 expression by reverse transcription-quantitative polymerase chain reaction. According to the quantiles of lncRNA TUG1 expression in Ph- ALL patients, these patients were divided into four tiers: tier 1 (ranked in 0%~25%), tier 2 (ranked in 25%~50%), tier 3 (ranked in 50%~75%), and tier 4 (ranked in 75%~100%). RESULTS: LncRNA TUG1 was upregulated in Ph- ALL patients compared with healthy donors. Further analysis indicated that in Ph- ALL patients, higher lncRNA TUG1 tier was correlated with the presence of central nervous system leukemia, increased white blood cell level, and bone marrow blasts. Furthermore, higher lncRNA TUG1 tier was negatively associated with complete remission (CR) within 4 weeks, total CR, and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant achievement. In addition, higher lncRNA TUG1 tier was associated with decreased disease-free survival and overall survival, which was further verified to be an independent factor by Cox's regression analysis. CONCLUSION: lncRNA TUG1 presents potential to be a novel biomarker for disease risk assessment and survival surveillance in Ph- ALL management.

Molecular genetics of MDS/MPN overlap syndromes.

The myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN) are a heterogenous group of myeloid malignancies hallmarked by clinicopathologic features that overlap with myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloproliferative neoplasms. Formally recognized by the World Health Organization, this group includes the entities chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia, atypical chronic myeloid leukemia, MDS/MPN with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis and MDS/MPN, unclassifiable. Advancements in next generation sequencing have begun to unravel the molecular underpinnings of these diseases, identifying an array of recurrently mutated genes involved in epigenetic regulation, RNA splicing, transcription, and cell signaling. Despite molecular overlap with other myeloid malignancies, each entity displays a unique spectrum of somatic mutations supporting their unique pathobiology and clinical features. Importantly, molecular profiling is becoming an integral tool utilized in routine clinical practice. This review summarizes our current understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of overlap syndromes and details the impact of somatic mutations in diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic decision-making.

Atypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia: Where Are We Now?

Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia, BCR-ABL1 negative (aCML) is a rare myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) with a high rate of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia, and poor survival. Until now, the diagnosis has been based on morphological grounds only, possibly making the real frequency of the disease underestimated. Only recently, new insights in the molecular biology of MDS/MPN syndromes have deepened our knowledge of aCML, enabling us to have a better molecular profile of the disease. The knowledge gleaned from next generation sequencing has complemented morphologic and laboratory WHO criteria for myeloid neoplasms and can provide greater specificity in distinguishing aCML from alternative MDS/MPN or MPNs. The most commonly mutated genes (>20%) in aCML are SETBP1, ASXL1, N/K-RAS, SRSF2, and TET2, and less frequently (< 10%) CBL, CSFR3, JAK2, EZH2, and ETNK1. Several of these mutations affect the JAK-STAT, MAPK, and ROCK signaling pathways, which are targetable by inhibitors that are already in clinical use and may lead to a personalized treatment of aCML patients unfit for allogeneic transplant, which is currently the only curative option for fit patients. In this review, we present two emblematic clinical cases and address the new molecular findings in aCML and the available treatment options.

How we manage Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms in pregnancy.

The combined incidence of classical Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) is 6-9/100 000 with a peak frequency between 50 and 70 years. MPN is less frequent in women of reproductive age. However, for essential thrombocythaemia (ET) in particular there is a second peak in women of reproductive age and 15% of polycythaemia vera (PV) patients are less than 40 years of age at the time of diagnosis. Thus these diseases are encountered in women of reproductive potential and may be diagnosed in pregnancy or in women being investigated for recurrent pregnancy loss. The incidence of MPN pregnancies is 3·2/100 000 maternities per year in the UK. The majority of data regarding Philadelphia-negative MPNs relates to patients with ET, for which the literature suggests significant maternal morbidity and poor fetal outcome; specifically maternal thrombosis and haemorrhage, miscarriage, pre-eclampsia, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR), stillbirth and premature delivery as summarised in the recent systematic review and meta-analysis in Blood, 2018, 132, 3046. The literature for PV is more sparse but increasing and is concordant with ET pregnancy outcomes. The literature regarding primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is even more scarce. Treatment options include aspirin, venesection, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) and cytoreductive therapy. Data and management recommendations are often extrapolated from other pro-thrombotic conditions or from ET to PV and PMF. Women of reproductive age with a diagnosis of MPN should receive information and assurance regarding management and outcome of future pregnancies. From pre-conceptual planning to the post-partum period, women should have access to joint care from an obstetrician with experience of high-risk pregnancies and a haematologist in a multidisciplinary setting. This paper provides an update with regards to Philadelphia-negative MPN in pregnancy, details local practise in an internationally recognised centre for patients with MPN and outlines a future research strategy.

Current and evolving understanding of atypical chronic myeloid leukemia.

Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) is a BCR-ABL1 negative myelodysplastic (MDS)/myeloproliferative (MPN) neoplasm with poor overall survival. The current 2016 WHO classification of myeloid neoplasms allows clinicians to more accurately differentiate aCML from its similar MDS/MPN overlap and MPN counterparts. In addition, the advent of next-generation sequencing has expanded our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of aCML and its therapeutic potential. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) remains the first consideration in the treatment algorithm for aCML, however, with the advances in mutational analysis, opportunities for targeted therapy have expanded. In this review, we highlight the current classification, diagnostic criteria, and molecular pathogenesis of aCML. We also discuss the therapeutic implications of the heterogeneous molecular fingerprint of aCML focusing on emerging targeted therapies, specifically ruxolitinib, dasatinib, and trametinib. Future disease management will rely on clinical trial development focused on new mutational drug targets, combination therapies, and signaling pathway dysregulation.

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for the treatment of BCR-ABL1-negative atypical chronic myeloid leukemia and chronic neutrophil leukemia: A retrospective nationwide study in Japan.

Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML) and chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) are rare BCR-ABL1 fusion gene-negative myeloid neoplasms with a predominance of neutrophils. Since no standard therapeutic strategy currently exists for these diseases, we retrospectively evaluated the outcomes of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) for aCML and CNL. Data from 14 aCML and 5 CNL patients as their diagnoses were collected using a nationwide survey. Allo-HSCT was performed between 2003 and 2014. Preconditioning regimens included myeloablative (n = 15), reduced-intensity (n = 3), and non-myeloablative (n = 1) regimens. Transplanted stem cells were obtained from HLA-matched related donors (n = 5) and alternative donors (n = 14). Neutrophil engraftment was successfully achieved in 17 patients. One-year overall survival rates (OS) were 54.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 24.8 to 76.7%) and 40.0% (95% CI, 5.2 to 75.3%) in patients with aCML and CNL, respectively. Among aCML patients, 1-year OS were 76.2% (95% CI, 33.2 to 93.5%) and 20.0% (95% CI, 0.8 to 58.2%) in patients with <5% myeloblasts (n = 9) and ≥5% myeloblasts (n = 5) in peripheral blood before allo-HSCT, respectively. These results suggest that allo-HSCT achieves long-term survival in patients with aCML and CNL. Better pre-transplant management is required to improve the outcomes of aCML patients with ≥5% blasts in peripheral blood.

Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia: a rare entity with management challenges.

The aim of our study was to review the clinicopathologic features and management of atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML). Relevant manuscripts published in English were searched using PubMed. aCML is diagnosed as per WHO 2016 classification in the presence of leukocytosis ≥13 × 109/l with circulating neutrophil precursors ≥10%, monocytes less than 10%, minimal basophils, hypercellular bone marrow with granulocytic proliferation and dysplasia, bone marrow blast less than 20% and absence of BCR/ABL fusion gene. Common cytogenetic features and mutations include trisomy 8, and mutations in SETBP1 and ETNK1. Median survival is 1-2 years. Hematopoietic stem cell transplant may be the only curative option. Ruxolitinib and dasatinib are emerging therapeutic options. Thus, aCML is a rare entity with poor survival. Novel therapies are needed.

Recent Progress in Chronic Neutrophilic Leukemia and Atypical Chronic Myeloid Leukemia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: We reviewed recent diagnostic and therapeutic progress in chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) and atypical chronic myeloid leukemia (aCML). We summarized recent genetic data that may guide future efforts towards implementing risk-adapted therapy based on mutational profile and improving disease control and survival of affected patients. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent genetic data in CNL and aCML prompted modifications to the World Health Organization (WHO) diagnostic criteria, which have improved our understanding of how CNL and aCML are different diseases despite sharing common findings of peripheral granulocytosis and marrow myeloid hyperplasia. The overlap of recurrently mutated genes between aCML and CMML support considering CSF3R-T618I mutated cases as a distinct entity, either as CNL or CNL with dysplasia. Ongoing preclinical and clinical studies will help to further inform the therapeutic approach to these diseases. Our understanding of CNL and aCML has greatly advanced over the last few years. This will improve clarity for the diagnosis of these diseases, provide a strategy for risk stratification, and guide risk-adapted therapy.

Somatic SETBP1 mutations in myeloid neoplasms.

SETBP1 is a SET-binding protein regulating self-renewal potential through HOXA-protein activation. Somatic SETBP1 mutations were identified by whole exome sequencing in several phenotypes of myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms (MDS/MPN), including atypical chronic myeloid leukemia, chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, and juvenile myelomonocytic leukemia as well as in secondary acute myeloid leukemia (sAML). Surprisingly, its recurrent somatic activated mutations are located at the identical positions of germline mutations reported in congenital Schinzel-Giedion syndrome. In general, somatic SETBP1 mutations have a significant clinical impact on the outcome as poor prognostic factor, due to downstream HOXA-pathway as well as associated aggressive types of chromosomal defects (-7/del(7q) and i(17q)), which is consistent with wild-type SETBP1 activation in aggressive types of acute myeloid leukemia and leukemic evolution. Biologically, mutant SETBP1 attenuates RUNX1 and activates MYB. The studies of mouse models confirmed biological significance of SETBP1 mutations in myeloid leukemogenesis, particularly associated with ASXL1 mutations. SETBP1 is a major oncogene in myeloid neoplasms, which cooperates with various genetic events and causes distinct phenotypes of MDS/MPN and sAML.

Allogeneic stem cell transplantation in patients with atypical chronic myeloid leukaemia: a retrospective study from the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation.

Atypical chronic myeloid leukaemia (aCML) is an aggressive malignancy for which allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) represents the only curative option. We describe transplant outcomes in 42 patients reported to the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) registry who underwent allo-HSCT for aCML between 1997 and 2006. Median age was 46 years. Median time from diagnosis to transplant was 7 months. Disease status was first chronic phase in 69%. Donors were human leucocyte antigen (HLA)-identical siblings in 64% and matched unrelated (MUD) in 36%. A reduced intensity conditioning was employed in 24% of patients. T-cell depletion was applied in 87% and 26% of transplants from MUD and HLA-identical siblings, respectively. According to the EBMT risk-score, 45% of patients were 'low-risk', 31% 'intermediate-risk' and 24% 'high-risk'. Following allo-HSCT, 87% of patients achieved complete remission. At 5 years, relapse-free survival was 36% and non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 24%, while relapse occurred in 40%. Patient age and the EBMT score had an impact on overall survival. Relapse-free survival was higher in MUD than in HLA-identical sibling HSCT, with no difference in NRM. In conclusion, this study confirmed that allo-HSCT represents a valid strategy to achieve cure in a reasonable proportion of patients with aCML, with young patients with low EBMT risk score being the best candidates.

How I treat atypical chronic myeloid leukemia.

Atypical chronic myeloid leukemia, BCR-ABL1 negative (aCML) is a rare myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) for which no current standard of care exists. The challenges of aCML relate to its heterogeneous clinical and genetic features, high rate of transformation to acute myeloid leukemia, and historically poor survival. Therefore, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation should always be an initial consideration for eligible patients with a suitable donor. Nontransplant approaches for treating aCML have otherwise largely relied on adopting treatment strategies used for MDS and MPN. However, such therapies, including hypomethylating agents, are based on a paucity of data. With an eye toward making a more meaningful impact on response rates and modification of the natural history of the disease, progress will rely on enrollment of patients into clinical trials and molecular profiling of individuals so that opportunities for targeted therapy can be exploited.

Pediatric-inspired therapy compared to allografting for Philadelphia chromosome-negative adult ALL in first complete remission.

For adults with Philadelphia chromosome-negative (Ph-) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) in first complete remission (CR1), allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) is an established curative strategy. However, pediatric-inspired chemotherapy may also offer durable leukemia-free survival in the absence of HCT. We compared 422 HCT recipients aged 18-50 years with Ph-ALL in CR1 reported to the CIBMTR with an age-matched concurrent cohort of 108 Ph- ALL CR1 patients who received a Dana-Farber Consortium pediatric-inspired non-HCT regimen. At 4 years of follow-up, incidence of relapse after HCT was 24% (95% CI 19-28) versus 23% (95% CI 15-32) for the non-HCT (chemo) cohort (P=0.97). Treatment-related mortality (TRM) was higher in the HCT cohort [HCT 37% (95% CI 31-42) versus chemo 6% (95% CI 3-12), P<0.0001]. DFS in the HCT cohort was 40% (95% CI 35-45) versus 71% (95% CI 60-79) for chemo, P<0.0001. Similarly, OS favored chemo [HCT 45% (95% CI 40-50)] versus chemo 73% [(95% CI 63-81), P<0.0001]. In multivariable analysis, the sole factor predictive of shorter OS was the administration of HCT [hazard ratio 3.12 (1.99-4.90), P<0.0001]. For younger adults with Ph- ALL, pediatric-inspired chemotherapy had lower TRM, no increase in relapse, and superior overall survival compared to HCT. Am. J. Hematol. 91:322-329, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.