How many patients do you need? Investigating trial designs for anti-seizure treatment in acute brain injury patients.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Epileptiform activity (EA), including seizures and periodic patterns, worsens outcomes in patients with acute brain injuries (e.g., aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage [aSAH]). Randomized control trials (RCTs) assessing anti-seizure interventions are needed. Due to scant drug efficacy data and ethical reservations with placebo utilization, and complex physiology of acute brain injury, RCTs are lacking or hindered by design constraints. We used a pharmacological model-guided simulator to design and determine the feasibility of RCTs evaluating EA treatment. METHODS: In a single-center cohort of adults (age >18) with aSAH and EA, we employed a mechanistic pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic framework to model treatment response using observational data. We subsequently simulated RCTs for levetiracetam and propofol, each with three treatment arms mirroring clinical practice and an additional placebo arm. Using our framework, we simulated EA trajectories across treatment arms. We predicted discharge modified Rankin Scale as a function of baseline covariates, EA burden, and drug doses using a double machine learning model learned from observational data. Differences in outcomes across arms were used to estimate the required sample size. RESULTS: Sample sizes ranged from 500 for levetiracetam 7 mg/kg versus placebo, to >4000 for levetiracetam 15 versus 7 mg/kg to achieve 80% power (5% type I error). For propofol 1 mg/kg/h versus placebo, 1200 participants were needed. Simulations comparing propofol at varying doses did not reach 80% power even at samples >1200. CONCLUSIONS: Our simulations using drug efficacy show sample sizes are infeasible, even for potentially unethical placebo-control trials. We highlight the strength of simulations with observational data to inform the null hypotheses and propose use of this simulation-based RCT paradigm to assess the feasibility of future trials of anti-seizure treatment in acute brain injury.

Correlation of drug dose estimated from national prescription registers with mean blood level of antiseizure medication in pregnancy.

PURPOSE: The purpose was to examine the correlation of antiseizure medication drug dose estimated from prescription fill records from prescription registers with blood levels during pregnancy. METHODS: We conducted a Nation-wide study of mothers who gave birth in Denmark between 1 January 2014 and 31 December 2018 using data from Danish Prescription and Laboratory Registers. We identified mothers with blood level measurements of antiseizure medication. The main exposure was estimated antiseizure medication dosage estimated from pregnancy-filled prescriptions in the Danish Prescription Register. The main outcome was the correlation of estimated dose with mean blood level of antiseizure medication in pregnancy. For privacy reasons, the number of blood level measurement and prescription fills were rounded to nearest 10, but proportions reported as exact values. RESULTS: Among 298 560 pregnancies, we identified pregnancies with recorded prescription fill from the prescription register for valproate (N = 90), lamotrigine (N = 1360), levetiracetam (N = 340), topiramate (N = 100), and carbamazepine (N = 60). In these pregnancies, blood level measurements were available in 50 (53%) pregnancies for valproate, 850 (62%) pregnancies for lamotrigine, 320 (93%) pregnancies for levetiracetam, 50 (68%) pregnancies for carbamazepine, and 40 (35%) pregnancies for topiramate. Pearsons's correlation coefficients for the correlation of estimated antiseizure medication dose with mean blood levels were 0.67 (p < 0.0001) for valproate, 0.63 (p < 0.0001) for lamotrigine, 0.63 (p < 0.0001) for levetiracetam, 0.76 (<0.0001) for carbamazepine and 0.89 (<0.0001) for topiramate. CONCLUSIONS: Dose of antiseizure medication estimated from prescription fills was a good proxy for blood levels and thus for biological exposure in pregnancy, suggesting that administrative prescription fill records may be a valuable resource for estimating exposure to antiseizure medication in pregnancy.

Levetiracetam Dosing Based on Glasgow Coma Scale Scores in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) increases the risk of early posttraumatic seizures (EPTS). Guidelines suggest the use of prophylactic antiseizure agents, including levetiracetam. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of using levetiracetam dosing based on Glasgow Comas Scale (GCS) scores with higher doses used for more severe TBI. METHODS: Patients 6 months to 18 years old admitted to Penn State Hershey Children's Hospital (PSHCH) with a TBI who received levetiracetam for EPTS prophylaxis with at least one documented GCS score were included. Patients were divided into two cohorts: before and after implementation of the pediatric TBI Cerner PowerPlan at PSHCH which standardized levetiracetam dosing based on GCS scores. Primary outcome was appropriate dosing of levetiracetam based on GCS. Secondary outcomes included seizure occurrence and adverse effects. RESULTS: Eighty-five patients were included: 42 in the pre-PowerPlan group and 43 in the post-PowerPlan group. Overall, 46 (54%) patients received the appropriate levetiracetam dose based on GCS (pre-PowerPlan, n = 19 [45%] vs. post-PowerPlan n = 27 [63%], p = 0.104). Sixty-four percent of severe TBI patients received appropriate levetiracetam dosing after implantation of the PowerPlan compared with 28% prior to the PowerPlan (p = 0.039). Three patients in each group experienced a seizure while on levetiracetam. Two patients experienced agitation and somnolence attributed to levetiracetam. CONCLUSION: Levetiracetam dosing based on GCS scores in pediatric TBI patients is a novel approach, and dosing accuracy may be increased with use of a PowerPlan. Additional large-scale studies are needed to evaluate efficacy and safety of this approach prior to widespread implementation.

Application of Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling to Characterize the Effects of Age and Obesity on the Disposition of Levetiracetam in the Pediatric Population.

BACKGROUND: Levetiracetam is an antiseizure medication used for several seizure types in adults and children aged 1 month and older; however, due to a lack of data, pharmacokinetic (PK) variability of levetiracetam is not adequately characterized in certain populations, particularly neonates, children younger than 2 years of age, and children older than 2 years of age with obesity. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to address the gap by leveraging PK data from two prospective standard-of-care pediatric trials (n = 88) covering an age range from 1 month to 19 years, including those with obesity (64%), and applying a physiologically based PK (PBPK) modeling framework. METHODS: A published PBPK model of levetiracetam for children aged 2 years and older was extended to pediatric patients younger than 2 years of age and patients older than 2 years of age with obesity by accounting for the obesity and age-related changes in PK using PK-Sim® software. The prospective pediatric data, along with the literature data for neonates and children younger than 2 years of age, were used to evaluate the extended PBPK models. RESULTS: Overall, 82.4% of data fell within the 90% interval of model-predicted concentrations, with an average fold error within twofold of the accepted criteria. PBPK modeling revealed that children with obesity had lower weight-normalized clearances (0.053 L/h/kg) on average than children without obesity (0.063 L/h/kg). The effect of maturation was well-characterized, resulting in comparable PBPK-simulated, weight-normalized clearances for neonates and children younger than 2 years of age reported from the literature. CONCLUSIONS: PBPK modeling simulations revealed that the current US FDA-labeled pediatric dosing regimen listed in the prescribing information can produce the required exposure of levetiracetam in these target populations with dose adjustments for children with obesity aged 4 years to younger than 16 years.

Dose adjustment strategy of levetiracetam in pregnant patients with epilepsy: Case report and literature review.

RATIONALE: Pregnant patients with epilepsy are prone to preterm delivery, stillbirth, or cesarean section, and their mortality rate is almost 10 times higher than that of normal pregnant women. The potential negative influences of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on the fetus are weighed against the necessity for achieving optimal control of seizures. Treatment with AEDs during pregnancy is a major challenge for pregnant women and healthcare teams. PATIENT CONCERNS: This paper reports two cases of young women diagnosed with pregnancy and epilepsy. INTERVENTION: The dose of levetiracetam was adjusted under the guidance of therapeutic drug monitoring to reduce the effects of seizures on the fetus and the incidence of reproductive toxicity caused by adverse drug reactions. OUTCOMES: Epilepsy was well controlled in the two pregnant patients, and the newborns had no genetic disorders. LESSONS: It is recommended to regularly monitor the serum LEV level in pregnant patients with epilepsy. This practice serves as a foundation for adjusting the drug treatment plan and offering more precise guidance for medication management during pregnancy.

Efficacy and safety of phenytoin and levetiracetam for acute symptomatic seizures in children with acute encephalitis syndrome: an open label, randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Seizures represent a significant comorbidity in children with acute encephalitis syndrome (AES). Despite this, there is a notable absence of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) directly comparing antiseizure medications (ASMs) in children with AES. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This RCT aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of phenytoin and levetiracetam in controlling seizures among children with AES. Both ASMs were administered with a loading followed by maintenance dose. After a 12-week period, children exhibiting a normal electroencephalogram and no seizure recurrence underwent tapering and discontinuation of ASM. Clinical follow-up occurred daily for the first week, and subsequently at 4, 12, and 24 weeks, evaluating seizure recurrence, incidence of status epilepticus, cognition, behavior, functional status, ASM acquisition cost, and adverse effects. RESULTS: A total of 100 children (50 in each group) were enrolled. Within the first week, 5 and 3 children in the phenytoin and levetiracetam groups expired. Up to 1 week or death (whichever occurred earliest), 46 (92 %) and 44 (88 %) children remained seizure-free. Intention-to-treat analysis for both best and worst-case scenarios showed insignificant differences (p=0.52 and 1.0). No children experienced seizure recurrence after 1 week in either group. The number of patients with breakthrough status epilepticus, need for mechanical ventilation, duration of hospital stay, presence of epileptiform abnormalities in repeat electroencephalogram at 12 weeks, functional outcomes at 1, 12, and 24 weeks, as well as cognition and behavioral profiles at 24 weeks, were comparable in both groups (p>0.05 for all). However, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) causally related to study medications was significantly higher in the phenytoin group (p=0.04). CONCLUSION: Levetiracetam and phenytoin are comparable in efficacy in terms of achieving clinical seizure control in children with acute encephalitis syndrome, although levetiracetam group demonstrated fewer adverse effects.

Psychiatric and behavioral concerns of perampanel with concomitant levetiracetam in children with epilepsy.

PURPOSE: Perampanel (PER) is expanding the therapeutic scope for pediatric epilepsy owing to its efficacy and favorable safety profile. However, concerns about psychiatric and behavioral adverse events (PBAEs) in combination therapy with levetiracetam (LEV) continue to contribute to hesitation in its prescription. We investigated the risk profiles for PBAEs when adding PER to pediatric epilepsy treatment and analyzed the differences according to the presence of concomitant LEV. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of children aged 4-18 years with epilepsy who were prescribed PER as adjunctive therapy from March 2016 to February 2023. We compared the occurrence and management of PBAEs between the PER without LEV and PER with LEV groups. The risk factors for PBAEs were also analyzed. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients (53 boys and 41 girls) were included in this study. The median age of total patients at the time of adding PER was 14.9 years (12.3-16.4 years), and 53 patients (56.4 %) had concomitant LEV. Forty-seven PBAEs occurred in 34 patients (36.2 %), with no significant differences depending on whether concomitant LEV is present or not. The most common PBAEs were aggression (14.9 %), irritability (9.6 %), affect lability (7.4 %), and acute psychosis (6.4 %). PBAEs occurred at a lower dosage (2-6 mg/day) in 70.6 % of the patients. In addition, 73.5 % of patients with PBAEs continued PER treatment by follow-up observation or by reducing the PER dosage. No risk factors, such as the presence of concomitant LEV or lamotrigine, any comorbid conditions, higher PER dosage (8-12 mg/day), two or more concomitant anti-seizure medications, and younger age (<13 years) at PER add-on, showed significant associations. CONCLUSION: When expanding the use of anti-seizure medications in pediatric patients, real-world evidence on safety issues is crucial for pediatric epileptologists. We confirmed that combination therapy with PER and LEV did not increase the risk profile of PBAEs.

Subcutaneous Bolus Infusions of Undiluted Levetiracetam for End-of-Life Patients: Two Cases.

We present two cases, in which end-of-life patients were inadvertently treated with bolus infusions of undiluted subcutaneous levetiracetam. The patients were treated for three and four days respectively. In both cases, the course of treatment was uneventful. Especially, no seizures, nor local irritation was observed. Administration of undiluted subcutaneous levetiracetam as intermittent bolus infusions by hand holds alluring properties for end-of-life patients. Amongst others reducing patient discomfort, increasing freedom of movement, and accessibility to essential seizure prophylaxis by eliminating the need for a syringe driver, thereby helping accommodate many patients wish to die in their own home. However, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety, including the optimum dilution and administration time of the subcutaneous preparation remains to be determined in clinically controlled trials.

Therapeutic drug monitoring in pregnancy: Levetiracetam.

OBJECTIVE: Levetiracetam (LEV) is an antiseizure medication that is mainly excreted by the kidneys. Due to its low teratogenic risk, LEV is frequently prescribed for women with epilepsy (WWE). Physiological changes during gestation affect the pharmacokinetic characteristics of LEV. The goal of our study was to characterize the changes in LEV clearance during pregnancy and the postpartum period, to better plan an LEV dosing paradigm for pregnant women. METHODS: This retrospective observational study incorporated a cohort of women who were followed up at the epilepsy in pregnancy clinic at Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center during the years 2020-2023. Individualized target concentrations of LEV and an empirical postpartum taper were used for seizure control and to reduce toxicity likelihood. Patient visits took place every 1-2 months and included a review of medication dosage, trough LEV blood levels, week of gestation and LEV dose at the time of level measurement, and seizure diaries. Total LEV concentration/dose was calculated based on LEV levels and dose as an estimation of LEV clearance. RESULTS: A total of 263 samples were collected from 38 pregnant patients. We observed a decrease in LEV concentration/dose (C/D) as the pregnancy progressed, followed by an abrupt postpartum increase. Compared to the 3rd trimester, the most significant C/D decrease was observed at the 1st trimester (slope = .85), with no significant change in the 2nd trimester (slope = .11). A significant increase in C/D occurred postpartum (slope = 5.23). LEV dose was gradually increased by 75% during pregnancy compared to preconception. Average serum levels (µg/mL) decreased during pregnancy. During the postpartum period, serum levels increased, whereas the LEV dose was decreased by 24%, compared to the 3rd trimester. SIGNIFICANCE: LEV serum level monitoring is essential for WWE prior to and during pregnancy as well as postpartum. Our data contribute to determining a rational treatment and dosing paradigm for LEV use during both pregnancy and the postpartum period.

Therapeutic drug monitoring and the therapeutic reference range of levetiracetam for Chinese patients: Problems and issues.

BACKGROUND: Levetiracetam (LEV) is widely used in the clinical monotherapy or multi-drug combination treatment of seizures due to its good tolerability and efficacy. Due to a lack of large-scale clinical studies, the relationship between levetiracetam concentrations, disease activity and adverse is unclear, limiting the usefulness of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) based LEV plasma levels. This study was intended to investigate factors influencing the pharmacokinetics of and the appropriate reference range of LEV concentration using available LEV TDM data. METHODS: A rapid, accurate and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS) method was established to determine LEV plasma concentrations. In this study, the levetiracetam plasma concentration monitoring data from 352 samples (taken from 248 patients) were used to explore the relationship between levetiracetam dose, age, combined administration with other antiseizure medications in patients with epilepsy. RESULTS: Age and combined administration emerged as important affecting factors for the correlation of LEV concentration and dose. The correlation between concentration and dose was better in monotherapy. Combined administration may affect LEV concentration, especially when LEV is combined with oxcarbazepine, which might decrease the LEV concentration. CONCLUSION: These findings emphasize the need to monitor LEV routinely LEV, especially among children and older adults when other antiseizure comedications are prescribed in the treatment regimen. LEV TDM is a well-established tool for the management of patients with epilepsy.

Targeting hippocampal amyloidogenesis with SV2A protein modulator levetiracetam.

Cerebral amyloid ß (Aß) proteostasis is compromised under neuronal overexcitation, long-term neuroinflammation and brain aging. Using the animal model of LPS-induced neuroinflammation we demonstrated that treatment with levetiracetam, a specific modulator of synaptic vesicle glycoprotein SV2A, rescues abnormal synaptic vesicle (SV) fusion and neurotransmitter release, decreasing elevated hippocampal APP levels in vivo. Therapy with levetiracetam upregulates the SV2A in hippocampus and restores the level of apolipoprotein E, involved in brain Aß aggregation/clearance and resolution of inflammation. We demonstrated that oligomers of Aß1-42 and Aß1-40 peptides promote SV clustering, which reduces the rate and plateau level of subsequent homo- and heterotypic SNARE-mediated SV fusion. Oligomeric Aß1-42 lowered ΔpH gradient across the vesicular membrane, thus affecting their neurotransmitter storage capacity. In contrast, monomers of Aß1-42 and Aß1-40 had negligible impact on studied processes. Our data suggests that in the course of progression of neuroinflammation oligomeric forms of Aß1-42 and Aß1-40 can compromise the SV fusion machinery and that antiepileptic agent levetiracetam, acting on SV recycling and restricting overexcitation, is able to affect APP processing and Aß generation within the hippocampus in vivo.

Analysis of the clinical characteristics of the liver injury induced by levetiracetam.

OBJECTIVES: Levetiracetam (LEV) has a low risk of hepatotoxicity due to low liver metabolism. Knowledge regarding the association between LEV exposure and liver injury is based mainly on case reports. The purpose of this study is to summarize the clinical features of LEV-induced liver injury. METHODS: We collected literature on liver injury induced by LEV for retrospective analysis from 1999 to April 2021 in Chinese and English. KEY FINDINGS: The median age of 21 patients (13 males and 8 females) was 31 years (range 0.13-76). The median time for liver injury was 19 days (range 3-120). The clinical manifestations of patients ranged from asymptomatic elevated liver enzymes in 5 patients (23.8%) to fever, digestive system symptoms and skin rash in 16 patients (76.2%). The median values of alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase were 773 IU/L (range 60-4800) and 667.5 IU/L (range 53-10 387), respectively. Liver biopsy demonstrated hepatocellular necrosis. The liver function returned to normal at a median time of 9 days (range 2-270) after discontinuation of LEV. CONCLUSIONS: LEV-induced liver injury is a rare adverse reaction, ranging from asymptomatic elevated transaminases to fulminant liver failure. Patients receiving long-term treatment with LEV should consider monitoring liver function.

Levetiracetam Prophylaxis for Children Admitted With Traumatic Brain Injury.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic antiseizure medications (ASMs) for pediatric traumatic brain injury (TBI) are understudied. We evaluated clinical and radiographic features that inform prescription of ASMs for pediatric TBI. We hypothesized that despite a lack of evidence, levetiracetam is the preferred prophylactic ASM but that prophylaxis is inconsistently prescribed. METHODS: This retrospective study assessed children admitted with TBI from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019. TBI severity was defined using Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores. Two independent neuroradiologists reviewed initial head computed tomography and brain magnetic resonance imaging. Fisher exact tests and descriptive and regression analyses were conducted. RESULTS: Among 167 children with TBI, 44 (26%) received ASM prophylaxis. All 44 (100%) received levetiracetam. Prophylaxis was more commonly prescribed for younger children, those with neurosurgical intervention, and abnormal neuroimaging (particularly intraparenchymal hematoma) (odds ratio = 10.3, confidence interval 1.8 to 58.9), or GCS ≤12. Six children (13.6%), all on ASM, developed early posttraumatic seizures (EPTSs). Of children with GCS ≤12, four of 17 (23.5%) on levetiracetam prophylaxis developed EPTSs, higher than the reported rate for phenytoin. CONCLUSIONS: Although some studies suggest it may be inferior to phenytoin, levetiracetam was exclusively used for EPTS prophylaxis. Intraparenchymal hematoma >1 cm was the single neuroimaging feature associated with ASM prophylaxis regardless of the GCS score. Yet these trends are not equivalent to optimal evidence-based management. We still observed important variability in neuroimaging characteristics and TBI severity for children on prophylaxis. Thus, further study of ASM prophylaxis and prevention of pediatric EPTSs is warranted.

Adjunctive Brivaracetam in Focal Epilepsy: Real-World Evidence from the BRIVAracetam add-on First Italian netwoRk STudy (BRIVAFIRST).

BACKGROUND: In randomized controlled trials, add-on brivaracetam (BRV) reduced seizure frequency in patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Studies performed in a naturalistic setting are a useful complement to characterize the drug profile. OBJECTIVE: This multicentre study assessed the effectiveness and tolerability of adjunctive BRV in a large population of patients with focal epilepsy in the context of real-world clinical practice. METHODS: The BRIVAFIRST (BRIVAracetam add-on First Italian netwoRk STudy) was a retrospective, multicentre study including adult patients prescribed adjunctive BRV. Patients with focal epilepsy and 12-month follow-up were considered. Main outcomes included the rates of seizure-freedom, seizure response (≥ 50% reduction in baseline seizure frequency), and treatment discontinuation. The incidence of adverse events (AEs) was also considered. Analyses by levetiracetam (LEV) status and concomitant use of strong enzyme-inducing antiseizure medications (EiASMs) and sodium channel blockers (SCBs) were performed. RESULTS: A total of 1029 patients with a median age of 45 years (33-56) was included. At 12 months, 169 (16.4%) patients were seizure-free and 383 (37.2%) were seizure responders. The rate of seizure freedom was 22.3% in LEV-naive patients, 7.1% in patients with prior LEV use and discontinuation due to insufficient efficacy, and 31.2% in patients with prior LEV use and discontinuation due to AEs (p < 0.001); the corresponding values for ≥ 50% seizure frequency reduction were 47.9%, 29.7%, and 42.8% (p < 0.001). There were no statistically significant differences in seizure freedom and seizure response rates by use of strong EiASMs. The rates of seizure freedom (20.0% vs. 16.6%;  p = 0.341) and seizure response (39.7% vs. 26.9%; p = 0.006) were higher in patients receiving SCBs than those not receiving SCBs; 265 (25.8%) patients discontinued BRV. AEs were reported by 30.1% of patients, and were less common in patients treated with BRV and concomitant SCBs than those not treated with SCBs (28.9% vs. 39.8%; p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: The BRIVAFIRST provided real-world evidence on the effectiveness of BRV in patients with focal epilepsy irrespective of LEV history and concomitant ASMs, and suggested favourable therapeutic combinations.

Acute COVID-19 Infection Associated With Necrotizing Disseminated Acute Leukoencephalopathy and Brain Microhemorrhages in a Pediatric Patient.

We present a case of a 14-year-old, previously healthy female, admitted with acute coronavirus disease 2019 infection and new-onset seizures secondary to virus-associated necrotizing disseminated acute leukoencephalopathy. Her symptoms resolved completely with intravenous immunoglobulin and steroids. Pathophysiology and prognosis of neurologic manifestations of coronavirus disease 2019 remain unclear.

The effect of antiepileptic drugs on re-myelinization of axons: Phenytoin, levetiracetam, carbamazepine, and valproic acid, used following traumatic brain injury.

OBJECTIVE: Traumatic brain injury is a major health and socioeconomic problem and the first cause of young death worldwide. For this reason, the prevention of post-traumatic brain injury and the research of new methods for it are important today. In this study, we aimed to determine whether the use of antiepileptic drugs contributed to axonal healing after traumatic brain injury. METHODS: Thirty-six Long-Evans rats, each weighing 300-350 g, were used in this study. A total of 6 groups, including the sham, control, and 4 study groups, were determined. A 1.5 mm-sized trauma was created in the biparietal area with a blunt-tipped dissector. Carbamazepine phenytoin valproic acid and levetiracetam (phenytoin: 30 mg/kg, valproic acid: 60 mg/kg, levetiracetam: 80 mg/kg, and carbamazepine: 36 mg/kg) were intraperitoneally administered to the study groups, and the control group intraperitoneally received a physiological saline solution (15 ml/kg) twice daily for 3 days. After 72 h, hemispheres of the sacrificed subjects were taken for examination in biochemistry and histology. Glutathione, malondialdehyde, and NG2 levels in the samples were determined. RESULTS: No significant difference was found in biochemical measurements. Histopathological examination revealed that the NG2 expression was more intense in the group treated with phenytoin and levetiracetam (phenytoin was partly higher) and the amount of edema decreased. The NG2 expression increased and the edema decreased, though lower in the group treated with carbamazepine and valproic acid, compared with phenytoin and levetiracetam. An increase in the NG2 expression and edema intensity were determined in the control and sham groups. CONCLUSION: Antiepileptic drug selection after traumatic brain injury is an important medical matter. Although the patient-oriented selection is essential, the study suggests that the choice of phenytoin, levetiracetam carbamazepine, and valproic acid will, respectively, have an accelerating effect for axonal healing.