Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
1.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34568719

RESUMO

National guidelines recommend sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) be offered to patients with > 10% likelihood of sentinel lymph node (SLN) positivity. On the other hand, guidelines do not recommend SLNB for patients with T1a tumors without high-risk features who have < 5% likelihood of a positive SLN. However, the decision to perform SLNB is less certain for patients with higher-risk T1 melanomas in which a positive node is expected 5%-10% of the time. We hypothesized that integrating clinicopathologic features with the 31-gene expression profile (31-GEP) score using advanced artificial intelligence techniques would provide more precise SLN risk prediction. METHODS: An integrated 31-GEP (i31-GEP) neural network algorithm incorporating clinicopathologic features with the continuous 31-GEP score was developed using a previously reported patient cohort (n = 1,398) and validated using an independent cohort (n = 1,674). RESULTS: Compared with other covariates in the i31-GEP, the continuous 31-GEP score had the largest likelihood ratio (G2 = 91.3, P < .001) for predicting SLN positivity. The i31-GEP demonstrated high concordance between predicted and observed SLN positivity rates (linear regression slope = 0.999). The i31-GEP increased the percentage of patients with T1-T4 tumors predicted to have < 5% SLN-positive likelihood from 8.5% to 27.7% with a negative predictive value of 98%. Importantly, for patients with T1 tumors originally classified with a likelihood of SLN positivity of 5%-10%, the i31-GEP reclassified 63% of cases as having < 5% or > 10% likelihood of positive SLN, for a more precise, personalized, and clinically actionable SLN-positive likelihood estimate. CONCLUSION: These data suggest the i31-GEP could reduce the number of SLNBs performed by identifying patients with likelihood under the 5% threshold for performance of SLNB and improve the yield of positive SLNBs by identifying patients more likely to have a positive SLNB.


Assuntos
Perfilação da Expressão Gênica/normas , Melanoma/diagnóstico , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica/métodos , Perfilação da Expressão Gênica/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Metástase Linfática/diagnóstico , Metástase Linfática/prevenção & controle , Melanoma/cirurgia , Linfonodo Sentinela/patologia , Linfonodo Sentinela/fisiopatologia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/métodos , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/normas , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod ; 50(8): 101991, 2021 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33238218

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Sentinel node (SN) assessment via frozen section (FS) has declined since the publication of Z0011 which modified the management of a specific group of patients with positive SN. The risk of misleading the surgeons to a preventable ALND and the cost are among the main factors for that. The aim of our study is to assess the value of FS in the post Z0011. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 244 patients out of 434 were eligible for an upfront SLNB. Based on the final histology and the clinical data we selected the eligible for breast conserving surgery patients (55.4%). 78 patients had positive SN and 26 of them fulfilled the criteria of Z0011. We assessed the false negative findings, the impact on the management and the indications and value of FS in the post Z0011 era. RESULTS: Overall, there were 12 FN cases out of which 7 were macrometastases (8.97%). Only in one case there were > 2 positive LN and 3 patients needed mastectomy. The remaining cases fulfilled the criteria of Z0011 and needed no further surgery hence in 96.1% of the cases the axillary status was correctly assessed via FS and the reoperation rate was 1.2%. On the contrary, if FS was not used, at least 21.3% of the patents would have needed reoperation based on the today's guidelines. DISCUSSION: We believe FS is still valuable and may spare a significant percentage of patients from a second operation (SNB) without leading to axillary overtreatment if used wisely.


Assuntos
Cuidados Intraoperatórios/normas , Linfonodo Sentinela/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Axila/patologia , Feminino , Secções Congeladas/métodos , Secções Congeladas/estatística & dados numéricos , Grécia , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/métodos , Cuidados Intraoperatórios/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Linfonodo Sentinela/fisiopatologia
3.
Int J Gynecol Cancer ; 30(9): 1390-1396, 2020 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32448808

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Early-stage ovarian cancer might represent an ideal disease scenario for sentinel lymph node application. Nevertheless, the published experience seems to be limited. Our objective was to assess the feasibility and safety concerns of sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with clinical stage I-II ovarian cancer. METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of 20 patients with histologically confirmed ovarian cancer. 99mTc and indocyanine green were injected into both the utero-ovarian and infundibulopelvic ligament stump, if they were present, during surgical staging. An intraoperative gamma probe and near-infrared fluorescence imaging were used to detect the sentinel lymph nodes. Inclusion criteria included: >18 years of age, suspicious adnexal mass (unilateral or bilateral) at ultrasound and CT imaging or confirmed ovarian tumor after previous surgery (unilateral or bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy with or without hysterectomy). Adverse events were recorded through postoperative day 30. The primary trial end point was to report adverse events related to the technique, including the use of 99mTc and ICG intraperitoneally, as well as the feasibility of the technique. RESULTS: A total of 20 patients were included in the analysis. Sentinel lymph nodes were detected in 14/15 (93%) pelvic and all 20 (100%) para-aortic regions. Five patients did not have utero-ovarian injection because of prior hysterectomy. The mean time from injection to sentinel lymph node resection was 53±15 min (range; 30-80). The mean number of harvested sentinel lymph nodes was 2.2±1.5 (range; 0-5) lymph nodes in the pelvis and 3.3±1.8 (range; 1-7) lymph nodes in the para-aortic region. There were no adverse intraoperative events, nor any within the 30 days of follow-up related with the technique. CONCLUSION: Sentinel lymph node mapping in early-stage ovarian cancer is feasible without major intraoperative or < 30 days safety concerns. (NCT03452982). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03452982.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Ovarianas/cirurgia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/métodos , Linfonodo Sentinela/fisiopatologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Estudos Prospectivos
4.
Melanoma Res ; 29(2): 163-171, 2019 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30778017

RESUMO

This study aimed to investigate the sentinel lymph node (SLN) tumour burden to predict the non-SLN positivity rate and the survival of melanoma patients to evaluate whether SLN microstaging could predict the prognosis, similar to what is currently performed by examining the lymph nodes excised by complete lymph node dissection. Of 1130 consecutive melanoma patients who underwent SLN biopsy, 226 were tumour-positive and 204 were included in this study. SLN metastases were classified on the basis of dimensional (Rotterdam) and topographic (Dewar) criteria either separately or combined. SLN metastases more than 1 mm in diameter had the highest non-SLN positivity rate (31%) compared with metastases 0.1-1 mm (10%) and less than 0.1 mm (4%). The non-SLN positivity rate was 45% for extensive metastases, 5% for subcapsular metastases and 23-29% for parenchymal, combined and multifocal classes, therefore suggesting a simplification of the parenchymal SLN metastases into only two classes: extensive and 'not extensive'. The dimension of the metastasis was correlated with a different non-SLN positivity rate only when the metastasis was in the parenchyma (20-36%) and not when it was in the subcapsular location (4-7%). Interestingly, the 5-year melanoma-specific survival (MSS) was 89% for patients with subcapsular less than 0.1 mm metastases and 45% for patients with nonsubcapsular more than 1 mm metastases (P=0.017). In the parenchyma, larger metastases (>1 mm) were related to a lower 5-year MSS (46%) than smaller (<1 mm) metastases (MSS 77%). SLN tumour burden characterization can be simplified and it can provide prognostic information on non-SLN positivity and survival, which is especially useful in patients who do not undergo complete lymph node dissection.


Assuntos
Excisão de Linfonodo/métodos , Metástase Linfática/fisiopatologia , Melanoma/complicações , Linfonodo Sentinela/fisiopatologia , Neoplasias Cutâneas/complicações , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Melanoma/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Neoplasias Cutâneas/patologia , Carga Tumoral , Adulto Jovem
5.
J Surg Oncol ; 114(7): 796-802, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27778360

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It is not clear whether sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) can be applied to patients with a second breast cancer or recurrence occurring at previously treated breast. The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility of SLNB procedure in patients with recurrent breast cancer. METHODS: Patients with non-metastatic recurrent N0 breast cancer at ipsilateral breast were included. Patients were grouped according to their initial breast, axilla, and overall surgery. Presence of drainage and its pattern as well as SLNB success rate and overall axillary involvement rates were assessed. Findings were compared. RESULTS: Out of 75 patients, mean age was 52.5 years and disease-free interval was 82 (9-312) months. Lymphatic drainage was successful in 42 (56%) patients. Drainage positivity was more frequent in patients who were previously treated with SLNB (82.6%) than in patients who underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) (44.2%; P = 0,002). Aberrant lymphatic drainage was detected in 64.3% of drainage positive patients. Success rate of reoperative SLNB was 92.9%. Adjuvant treatment plan was altered in 12 (16%) patients. In 15 patients, negative SLNB prevented axillary dissection. CONCLUSIONS: Reoperative SLNB seems to be technically feasible in N0 recurrent breast cancer patients. It may further avoid unnecessary ALND and lead changes in adjuvant treatment plans. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:796-802. © 2016 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/patologia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela , Linfonodo Sentinela/patologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Axila , Neoplasias da Mama/fisiopatologia , Neoplasias da Mama/terapia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/fisiopatologia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/terapia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/fisiopatologia , Carcinoma Intraductal não Infiltrante/terapia , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/fisiopatologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Linfonodo Sentinela/fisiopatologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA