How does cervical sagittal profile change after the spontaneous compensation of global sagittal imbalance following one- or two-level lumbar fusion.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the cervical sagittal profile after the spontaneous compensation of global sagittal imbalance and analyze the associations between the changes in cervical sagittal alignment and spinopelvic parameters. METHODS: In this retrospective radiographic study, we analyzed 90 patients with degenerative lumbar stenosis (DLS) and sagittal imbalance who underwent short lumbar fusion (imbalance group). We used 60 patients with DLS and sagittal balance as the control group (balance group). Patients in the imbalance group were also divided into two groups according to the preoperative PI: low PI group (≤ 50°), high PI group (PI > 50°). We measured the spinal sagittal alignment parameters on the long-cassette standing lateral radiographs of the whole spine. We compared the changes of spinal sagittal parameters between pre-operation and post-operation. We observed the relationships between the changes in cervical profile and spinopelvic parameters. RESULTS: Sagittal vertical axis (SVA) occurred spontaneous compensation (p = 0.000) and significant changes were observed in cervical lordosis (CL) (p = 0.000) and cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) (p = 0.023) after surgery in the imbalance group. However, there were no significant differences in the radiographic parameters from pre-operation to post-operation in the balance group. The variations in CL were correlated with the variations in SVA (R = 0.307, p = 0.041). The variations in cSVA were correlated with the variations in SVA (R=-0.470, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Cervical sagittal profile would have compensatory changes after short lumbar fusion. The spontaneous decrease in CL would occur in patients with DLS after the spontaneous compensation of global sagittal imbalance following one- or two-level lumbar fusion. The changes of cervical sagittal profile were related to the extent of the spontaneous compensation of SVA.

Long-term efficacy of Waveflex semi-rigid-dynamic-internal-fixation system in delaying intervertebral disc degeneration at adjacent segments and improving spinal sagittal imbalance.

The Waveflex semi-rigid-dynamic-internal-fixation system shows good short-term effects in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases, but there are few long-term follow-up studies, especially for recovery of sagittal balance. Fifty patients with lumbar degenerative diseases treated from January 2016 to October 2017 were retrospectively analysed: 25 patients treated with Waveflex semi-rigid-dynamic-internal-fixation system (Waveflex group) and 25 patients treated with double-segment PLIF (PLIF group). Clinical efficacy was evaluated by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Imaging data before surgery and at 3 months, 1 year, and 5 years postoperatively was used for imaging indicator assessment. Local disc degeneration of the cephalic adjacent segment (including disc height index (DHI), intervertebral foramen height (IFH), and range of motion (ROM)) and overall spinal motor function (including lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), and |PI-LL|) were analysed. Regarding clinical efficacy, comparison of VAS and ODI scores between the Waveflex and PLIF groups showed no significant preoperative or postoperative differences. The comparison of the objective imaging indicators showed no significant differences in the DHI, IFH, LL, |PI-LL|, and SS values between the Waveflex and PLIF groups preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively (P > 0.05). These values were significantly different at 1 and 5 years postoperatively (P < 0.05), and the Waveflex group showed better ROM values than those of the PLIF group (P < 0.05). PI values were not significantly different between the groups, but PT showed a significant improvement in the Waveflex group 5 years postoperatively (P < 0.05). The Waveflex semi-rigid dynamic fixation system can effectively reduce the probability of intervertebral disc degeneration in upper adjacent segments. Simultaneously, patients in the Waveflex group showed postoperative improvements in LL, spinal sagittal imbalance, and quality of life.

Lumbar lordosis and sacral slope do not differ in two types of postoperative lumbar disc re-herniation: a cross-sectional observational study.

BACKGROUND: To identify the differences of lumbar lordosis (LL) and sacral slope (SS) angles between two types of postoperative lumbar disc re-herniation, including the recurrence of same level and adjacent segment herniation (ASH). METHODS: We searched the medical records of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) patients with re-herniation with complete imaging data (n = 58) from January 1, 2013 to December 30, 2020 in our hospital. After matching for age and sex, 58 patients with LDH without re-herniation from the same period operated by the same treatment group in our hospital were served as a control group. Re-herniation patients were divided into two groups, same-level recurrent lumbar disc herniation group (rLDHG) and adjacent segment herniation group with or without recurrence (ASHG). The preoperative, postoperative and one month after operation LL and SS were measured on standing radiographs and compared with the control group by using t-test, ANOVA, and rank-sum test. Next, we calculated the odds ratios (ORs) by unconditional logistic regression, progressively adjusted for other confounding factors. RESULTS: Compared with the control group, the postoperative LL and SS were significantly lower in LDH patients with re-herniation. However, there were no differences in LL and SS between ASHG and rLDHG at any stage. After progressive adjustment for confounding factors, no matter what stage is, LL and SS remained unassociated with the two types of re-herniation. CONCLUSIONS: Low postoperative LL and SS angles are associated with degeneration of the remaining disc. Low LL and SS may be independent risk factors for re-herniation but cannot determine type of recurrence (same or adjacent disc level).

Meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of OLIF and TLIF in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the difference in clinical efficacy between two surgical approaches, oblique lateral approach and intervertebral foraminal approach, in the treatment of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. METHODS: English databases, including PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science, were systematically searched using keywords such as "oblique lumbar interbody fusion" and "transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion." Concurrently, Chinese databases, including CNKI, WanFang data, VIP, and CBM, were also queried using corresponding Chinese terms. The search spanned from January 2014 to February 2024, focusing on published studies in both Chinese and English that compared the clinical efficacy of OLIF and TLIF. The literature screening was conducted by reviewing titles, abstracts, and full texts. Literature meeting the inclusion criteria underwent quality assessment, and relevant data were extracted. Statistical analysis and a meta-analysis of the observational data for both surgical groups were performed using Excel and RevMan 5.4 software. Findings revealed a total of 14 studies meeting the inclusion criteria, encompassing 877 patients. Of these, 414 patients were in the OLIF group, while 463 were in the TLIF group. Meta-analysis of the statistical data revealed that compared to TLIF, OLIF had a shorter average surgical duration (P < 0.05), reduced intraoperative bleeding (P < 0.05), shorter average hospital stay (P < 0.05), better improvement in postoperative VAS scores (P < 0.05), superior enhancement in postoperative ODI scores (P < 0.05), more effective restoration of disc height (P < 0.05), and better correction of lumbar lordosis (P < 0.05). However, there were no significant differences between OLIF and TLIF in terms of the incidence of surgical complications (P > 0.05) and fusion rates (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: When treating degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, OLIF demonstrates significant advantages over TLIF in terms of shorter surgical duration, reduced intraoperative bleeding, shorter hospital stay, superior improvement in postoperative VAS and ODI scores, better restoration of disc height, and more effective correction of lumbar lordosis.

Is the anterior approach still superior to posterior correction in AIS regarding correction, fusion levels and kyphosis when modern posterior systems are used?

PURPOSE: The aim of our study is to compare anterior and posterior corrections of thoracic (Lenke I) and lumbar (Lenke V) curves when modern posterior pedicle screw systems with vertebral derotation techniques are used. Curves that could not be corrected with both systems were excluded. METHODS: A thoracic group (N = 56) of Lenke I AIS patients (18 anterior and 38 posterior) and a lumbar group (N = 42) of Lenke V patients (14 anterior and 28 posterior) with similar curves < 65° were identified. RESULTS: Thoracic group The mean postoperative correction (POC) was 68 ± 13.4% in the anterior and 72 ± 10.5% in the posterior group. The postoperative change in thoracic kyphosis was +4° and +5° respectively. The median length of fusion was eight segments in the posterior and seven segments in the anterior groups. In 89% the LIV was EV or shorter in the anterior, and in 71% of the posterior corrections. Lumbar group The mean POC was 75 ± 18.3% (anterior) and 72 ± 8.5% (posterior). The postoperative gain in lumbar lordosis was 0.8° (anterior) and 4° (posterior). The median length of fusion was five segments in both groups and there was no difference in relation of the LIV to the EV. CONCLUSION: With modern implants and derotation techniques, the posterior approach can achieve similar coronal correction, apical derotation and thoracic kyphosis with similar length of fusion and better lumbar lordosis restoration.

Association patterns between lumbar paraspinal muscles and sagittal malalignment in preoperative patients undergoing lumbar three-column osteotomy.

PURPOSE: We aim to investigate the associations between lumbar paraspinal muscles and sagittal malalignment in patients undergoing lumbar three-column osteotomy. METHODS: Patients undergoing three-column osteotomy between 2016 and 2021 with preoperative lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and whole spine radiographs in the standing position were included. Muscle measurements were obtained using a validated custom software for segmentation and muscle evaluation to calculate the functional cross-sectional area (fCSA) and percent fat infiltration (FI) of the m. psoas major (PM) as well as the m. erector spinae (ES) and m. multifidus (MM). Spinopelvic measurements included pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), pelvic tilt (PT), L1-S1 lordosis (LL), T4-12 thoracic kyphosis (TK), spino-sacral angle (SSA), C7-S1 sagittal vertical axis (SVA), T1 pelvic angle (TPA) and PI-LL mismatch (PI - LL). Statistics were performed using multivariable linear regressions adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS: A total of 77 patients (n = 40 female, median age 64 years, median BMI 27.9 kg/m2) were analyzed. After adjusting for age, sex and BMI, regression analyses demonstrated that a greater fCSA of the ES was significantly associated with greater SS and SSA. Moreover, our results showed a significant correlation between a greater FI of the ES and a greater kyphosis of TK. CONCLUSION: This study included a large patient cohort with sagittal alignment undergoing three-column osteotomy and is the first to demonstrate significant associations between the lumbar paraspinal muscle parameters and global sagittal alignment. Our findings emphasize the importance of the lumbar paraspinal muscles in sagittal malalignment.

A Novel Surgical Indication for Scheuermann's Kyphosis.

Scheuermann kyphosis can be treated surgically to restore proper sagittal alignment. Thoracic curves >70° are typically indicated for surgical intervention. However, patients who have reached their natural limit of compensatory lumbar hyperlordosis are at risk of accelerated degeneration. This can be determined by comparing lumbar lordosis on standing neutral radiographs and supine extension radiographs. Minimal additional lordosis in extension compared with neutral, abutment of the spinous processes, or greater lumbar lordosis standing than with attempted extension suggest the patient is maximally compensated. We present a case of an adolescent boy with Scheuermann kyphosis who had reached the limit of his hyperlordosis compensation reserve. He subsequently underwent a T4 to L2 posterior spinal fusion with T7 to T11 Ponte Smith-Petersen grade two osteotomies. He tolerated the procedure well with no intraoperative complications or neuromonitoring changes. The patient has continued to do well and progressed to normal activity at 5-month follow-up.

Defining threshold for sagittal correction in lumbar fractures.

PURPOSE: Surgical indications for thoraco-lumbar fractures are driven both by neurological status, fractures instability and kyphotic deformity. Regarding kyphotic deformity, an angulation superior to 20° is considered by many surgeons as a surgical indication to reduce the disability induced by post-traumatic kyphosis. However, there is a lack of data reporting the ideal or theoretical lordosis that one must have in a particular lumbar segment on CT-scan. The main goal of this study was to determine the mean value for segmental lumbar lordosis according to pelvic incidence (PI) on a cohort of normal subjects. METHODS: The consecutive CT-scan of 171 normal adult subjects were retrospectively analyzed. The PI and the segmental lordosis (L4S1, L3L5, L2L4, L3L1, L2T12 and T11-L1) were measured on all CT-scan. The mean values were calculated for the global cohort and a sub-group analysis according to IP ranges (< 45°, 45 < IP < 60° and > 60°) was performed. RESULTS: The mean angular values for the whole cohort were IP: 54, 9°; L4S1: - 38, 1°; L3L5: - 30, 6°; L2L4: - 14, 1°; L1L3: - 4, 9°; T12L2: + 1, 9° and T11L1: + 5, 4°. The segmental values vary significatively with PI ranges, as for L3L5: - 26, 8° (PI < 45°); - 30° (45 < PI < 60°) and - 35, 1° (PI > 60°). CONCLUSION: These results provide a referential of theoretical values of segmental lordosis according to PI. This abacus may help spinal surgeon in their decision-making process regarding lumbar fractures, to determine the amount of sagittal correction needed, according to the PI range, to be adapted to the sagittal morphology of the patient. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Changes in cervical sagittal balance following anterior cervical discectomy with fusion.

INTRODUCTION: Change in the sagittal balance after anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF) is a phenomenon that has not yet been sufficiently studied. The aim of this study was to assess such changes. MATERIAL AND METHODS: 28 patients who underwent ACDF for cervical spondylosis were examined. The study was divided into three stages: preoperative, early postoperative, and late postoperative. Sagittal alignments were analysed based on X-ray AP and lateral images: angles C1-C7, C2-C7, C1-C2, C1-C4, C4-C7 and cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA). RESULTS: The cervical lordosis C2-C7 decreased by 13% in early monitoring, after which it increased by 60% in the late postoperative phase. Post hoc analysis showed that the measured values between early and late postoperative monitoring differed significantly. Cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) increased by 23% in early control and then decreased by 18% in the late postoperative phase. Post hoc analysis showed that the measured values significantly differed between preoperative and early postoperative monitoring, and between early and late postoperative monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown that the long-term effect of ACDF is correction of the sagittal balance of the cervical spine. Immediately after the procedure, a disturbance in the cervical spine curvature to the morphology of the entire spine is observed.

Impact of obesity on adult spinal deformity (ASD) long-segment spinal fusion radiographic and clinical outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review of patients receiving long-segment fusion during a five-year period. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether obese patients receive comparable benefits when receiving long-segment fusion compared to non-obese patients and to identify factors that may predict hardware failure and post-surgical complications among obese patients. METHODS: Demographic, spinopelvic radiographic, patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), and complications data was retrospectively collected from 120 patients who underwent long-segment fusion during a five-year period at one tertiary care medical center. Radiographic measurements were pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt (PT), lumbar lordosis, L4-S1 lordosis, thoracic kyphosis, sagittal vertical axis, PI-LL mismatch, and proximal junction cobb angle at upper instrumented vertebrae + 2 (UIV+2). PROMs were Oswestry disability index, numeric rating scale (NRS) Back Pain, NRS Leg Pain, RAND SF-36 pain, and RAND SF-36 physical functioning. Included patients were adults and had at least 2-years of postoperative follow-up. Descriptive and multivariate statistical analysis was performed with α = 0.05. RESULTS: Patients with a BMI ≥ 30 (n=63) and patients with a BMI < 30 (n=57) demonstrated comparable improvements (P>0.05) for all spinopelvic radiographic measurements and PROMs. Each cohort demonstrated significant improvements from pre-assessment to post-assessment on nearly all spinopelvic radiographic measurements and PROMs (P<0.05), except PT and L4-S1 lordosis where neither group improved (p=0.95 and 0.58 for PT and P=0.23 and 0.11 for L4-S1 lordosis fornon-obese and obese cohorts respectively) and SF-36 physical functioning where the non-obese cohort not statistically improve (P=0.08). Patients with a BMI ≥ 30 demonstrated an increased incidence of cardiovascular complications (P=0.0293), acute kidney injury (P=0.0241), rod fractures (P=0.0293), and reoperations (P=0.0241) when compared to patients with a BMI < 30. CONCLUSION: This study adds to a growing body of evidence linking demographic factors with risks of hardware failure. Further, this data challenges the assumption that obese patients may not receive sufficient benefit to be long-segment surgical candidates. However, given their elevated risk for post-operative and delayed hardware complications, obese patients should be appropriately counseling before undergoing surgery.

Influences of lumbo-sacral transitional vertebrae for anterior lumbar interbody fusion.

Lumbo-sacral transitional vertebrae (LSTV) are frequent congenital variances of the spine and are associated with increased spinal degeneration. Nevertheless, there is a lack of data whether bony alterations associated with LSTV result in reduced segmental restoration of lordosis when performing ALIF. 58 patients with monosegmental stand-alone ALIF in the spinal segment between the 24th and 25th vertebra (L5/S1)/(L5/L6) where included. Of these, 17 patients had LSTV and were matched to a control population by age and sex. Pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sagittal vertical axis, lumbar lordosis, segmental lordosis, disc height and depth were compared. LSTV-patients had a significantly reduced segmental lordosis L4/5 (p = 0.028) and L5/S1/(L5/L6) (p = 0.041) preoperatively. ALIF resulted in a significant increase in segmental lordosis L5/S1 (p < 0.001). Postoperatively, the preoperatively reduced segmental lordosis was no longer significantly different in segments L4/5 (p = 0.349) and L5/S1/(L5/6) (p = 0.576). ALIF is associated with a significant increase in segmental lordosis in the treated segment even in patients with LSTV. Therefore, ALIF is a sufficient intervention for restoring the segmental lordosis in these patients as well.

Short-term and mid-term evaluation of three types of minimally invasive lumbar fusion surgery for treatment of L4/L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis.

This was a single-centre retrospective study. Minimally invasive techniques for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF), oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF), and percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (Endo-TLIF) have been extensively used for lumbar degenerative diseases. The present study analyses the short-term and mid-term clinical effects of the above three minimally invasive techniques on L4/L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis. In this retrospective study, 98 patients with L4/L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis received MIS-TLIF, 107 received OLIF, and 114 received Endo-TLIF. All patients were followed up for at least one year. We compared patient data, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI), Oswestry disability index (ODI), visual analogue scale of low back pain (VAS-B), visual analogue scale of leg pain (VAS-L), surgical time, blood loss, drainage volume, hospital stay, complications, and neurological status. Moreover, we performed imaging evaluations, including lumbar lordosis angle (LLA), disc height (DH) and intervertebral fusion status. No significant differences were noted in age, sex, BMI, preoperative ODI, preoperative VAS-B, preoperative VAS-L, preoperative LLA, or preoperative DH. Patients who underwent OLIF had significantly decreased blood loss, a lower drainage volume, and a shorter hospital stay than those who underwent MIS-TLIF or Endo-TLIF (P < 0.05). The VAS-B in the OLIF group significantly decreased compared with in the MIS-TLIF and Endo-TLIF groups at 6 and 12 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). The VAS-L in the Endo-TLIF group significantly decreased compared with that in the MIS-TLIF and OLIF groups at 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). The ODI in the OLIF group was significantly better than that in the MIS-TLIF and Endo-TLIF groups at 6 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences in the incidence of complications and healthcare cost were found among the three groups. Follow-up LLA and DH changes were significantly lower in the OLIF group than in the other groups (P < 0.05). The intervertebral fusion rate was significantly higher in the OLIF group than in the other groups at 6 and 12 months postoperatively (P < 0.05). In conclusion, while MIS-TLIF, OLIF, and Endo-TLIF techniques can effectively treat patients with L4/5 degenerative spondylolisthesis, OLIF has more benefits, including less operative blood loss, a shorter hospital stay, a smaller drainage volume, efficacy for back pain, effective maintenance of lumbar lordosis angle and disc height, and a higher fusion rate. OLIF should be the preferred surgical treatment for patients with L4/5 degenerative spondylolisthesis.

[Comparison of effectiveness between unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression and unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion for degree â degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis].

Objective: To compare the effectiveness of unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression and unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (ULIF) in the treatment of degreeⅠdegenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS). Methods: A clinical data of 58 patients with degreeⅠDLS who met the selection criteria between October 2021 and October 2022 was retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 28 cases were treated with unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression (decompression group) and 30 cases with ULIF (ULIF group). There was no significant difference between the two groups ( P>0.05) in the gender, age, lesion segment, and preoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score of low back pain, VAS score of leg pain, Oswestry disability index (ODI), C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), disk height (DH), segmental lordosis (SL), and other baseline data. The operation time, postoperative drainage volume, postoperative ambulation time, VAS score of low back pain, VAS score of leg pain, ODI, laboratory examination indexes (CRP, ESR), and imaging parameters (DH, SL) were compared between the two groups. Results: Compared with the ULIF group, the decompression group had shorter operation time, less postoperative drainage, and earlier ambulation ( P<0.05). All incisions healed by first intention, and no complication such as nerve root injury, epidural hematoma, or infection occurred. All patients were followed up 12 months. Laboratory tests showed that ESR and CRP at 3 days after operation in decompression group were not significantly different from those before operation ( P>0.05), while the above indexes in ULIF group significantly increased at 3 days after operation compared to preoperative values ( P<0.05). There were significant differences in the changes of ESR and CRP before and after operation between the two groups ( P<0.05). Except that the VAS score of low back pain at 3 days after operation was not significantly different from that before operation in decompression group ( P>0.05), there were significant differences in VAS score of low back pain and VAS score of leg pain between the two groups at other time points ( P<0.05). The VAS score of low back pain in ULIF group was significantly higher than that in decompression group at 3 days after operation ( P<0.05), and there was no significant difference in VAS score of low back pain and VAS score of leg pain between the two groups at other time points ( P>0.05). The ODI of the two groups significantly improved after operation ( P<0.05), but there was no significant difference between 3 days and 6 months after operation ( P>0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups at the two time points after operation ( P<0.05). Imaging examination showed that there was no significant difference in DH and SL between pre-operation and 12 months after operation in decompression group ( P>0.05). However, the above two indexes in ULIF group were significantly higher than those before operation ( P<0.05). There were significant differences in the changes of DH and SL before and after operation between the two groups ( P<0.05). Conclusion: Unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression can achieve good effectiveness in the treatment of degree Ⅰ DLS. Compared with ULIF, it can shorten operation time, reduce postoperative drainage volume, promote early ambulation, reduce inflammatory reaction, and accelerate postoperative recovery. ULIF has more advantages in restoring intervertebral DH and SL.

The analysis of segmental lordosis restored by oblique lumbar interbody fusion and related factors: building up preoperative predicting model.

BACKGROUND: Oblique lumbar interbody fusion (OLIF) procedures have the potential to increase the segmental lordosis by inserting lordotic cages, however, the amount of segmental lordosis (SL) changes can vary and is likely influenced by several factors, such as patient characteristics, radiographic parameters, and surgical techniques. The objective of this study was to analyze the impact of related factors on the amount of SL changes in OLIF procedures and to build up predictive model for SL changes. METHODS: This is a retrospective study involving prospectively enrolled patients. A total of 119 patients with 174 segments undergoing OLIF procedure were included and analyzed. The lordotic cages used in all cases had 6-degree angle. Radiographic parameters including preoperative and postoperative segmental disc angle (SDA, preSDA and postSDA), SDA changes on flexion-extension views (ΔSDA-FE), CageLocation and CageInclination were measured by two observers. Interobserver reliability of measurements were ensured by analysis of interclass correlation coefficient (ICC > 0.75). Pearson correlation coefficient analysis and multivariate linear regression were employed to identify factors related to SDA changes and to build up predictive model for SDA changes. RESULTS: The average change of segmental disc angle (ΔSDA, postSDA-preSDA) was 3.9° ± 4.8° (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.1°-4.6°) with preSDA 5.3° ± 5.0°. ΔSDA was 10.8° ± 3.2° with negative preSDA (kyphotic), 5.0° ± 3.7° with preSDA ranging from 0° to 6°, and 1.0° ± 4.1° with preSDA> 6°. Correlation analysis revealed a significant negative correlation between ΔSDA and preSDA (r = - 0.713, P < 0.001), CageLocation (r = - 0.183, P = 0.016) and ΔSDA-FE (r = - 0.153, P = 0.044). In the multivariate linear regression, preSDA and CageLocation were included in the predictive model, resulting in minimal adjusted R2 change (0.017) by including CageLocation. Therefore, the recommended predictive model was ΔSDA = 7.9-0.8 × preSDA with acceptable fit. (adjusted R2 = 0.508, n = 174, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The restoration of segmental lordosis through OLIF largely depends on the preoperative segmental lordosis. The predictive model, which utilized preoperative segmental lordosis, facilitates preoperative planning for corrective surgery using the OLIF procedure.

Comparison of instrumented and stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Both instrumented and stand-alone lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) have been widely used to treat lumbar degenerative disease. However, it remains controversial as whether posterior internal fixation is required when LLIF is performed. This meta-analysis aims to compare the radiographic and clinical results between instrumented and stand-alone LLIF. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Collaboration Library up to March 2023 were searched for studies that compared instrumented and stand-alone LLIF in the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. The following outcomes were extracted for comparison: interbody fusion rate, cage subsidence rate, reoperation rate, restoration of disc height, segmental lordosis, lumbar lordosis, visual analog scale (VAS) scores of low-back and leg pain and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. RESULTS: 13 studies involving 1063 patients were included. The pooled results showed that instrumented LLIF had higher fusion rate (OR 2.09; 95% CI 1.16-3.75; P = 0.01), lower cage subsidence (OR 0.50; 95% CI 0.37-0.68; P < 0.001) and reoperation rate (OR 0.28; 95% CI 0.10-0.79; P = 0.02), and more restoration of disc height (MD 0.85; 95% CI 0.18-1.53; P = 0.01) than stand-alone LLIF. The ODI and VAS scores were similar between instrumented and stand-alone LLIF at the last follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this meta-analysis, instrumented LLIF is associated with higher rate of fusion, lower rate of cage subsidence and reoperation, and more restoration of disc height than stand-alone LLIF. For patients with high risk factors of cage subsidence, instrumented LLIF should be applied to reduce postoperative complications.

Characteristics and standards of severe sagittal imbalance in adult patients with spinal deformities: a retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the characteristics of "severe" dynamic sagittal imbalance (DSI) in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD) and establish criteria for them. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 102 patients with ASD presenting four cardinal signs of lumbar degenerative kyphosis. All patients underwent deformity corrective surgery and were divided into three groups according to the diagnostic criteria based on the Oswestry disability index and dynamic features (△Timewalk: time until C7 sagittal vertical axis [C7SVA] reaches ≥ 20 cm after the start of walking) of sagittal imbalance. The paravertebral back muscles were analyzed and compared using T2-weighted axial imaging. We performed a statistically time-dependent spinopelvic sagittal parameter analysis of full standing lateral lumbar radiographs. Lumbar flexibility was analyzed using dynamic lateral lumbar radiography. RESULTS: The patients were classified into the mild (△Timewalk ≥ 180 s, 35 patients), moderate (180 s > △Timewalk ≥ 30 s, 38 patients), and severe (△Timewalk < 30 s, 29 patients) groups. The back muscles in the severe group exhibited a significantly higher signal intensity (533.4 ± 237.5, p < 0.05) and larger area of fat infiltration (35.2 ± 5.4, p < 0.05) than those in the mild (223.8 ± 67.6/22.9 ± 11.9) and moderate groups (294.4 ± 214.7/21.6 ± 10.6). The analysis of lumbar flexibility revealed significantly lower values in the severe group (5.8° ± 2.5°, p < 0.05) than in the mild and moderate groups (14.2° ± 12.4° and 11.4° ± 8.7°, respectively). The severe group had significantly lower lumbar lordosis (LL, 25.1° ± 22.7°, p < 0.05) and Pelvic incidence-LL mismatch (PI-LL, 81.5° ± 26.6°, p < 0.001) than those of the mild (8.2° ± 16.3°/58.7° ± 18.8°) and moderate (14.3° ± 28.6°/66.8° ± 13.4°) groups. On receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, PI-LL was statistically significant, with an area under the curve of 0.810 (95% confidence interval) when the baseline was set at 75.3°. The severe group had more postoperative complications than the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest the following criteria for severe DSI: C7SVA > 20 cm within 30 s of walking or standing, a rigid lumbar curve < 10° on dynamic lateral radiographs, and a PI-LL mismatch > 75.3°.

What Happens to Sagittal Alignment Following Laminoplasty Versus Laminectomy and Fusion?

OBJECTIVE: Laminectomy and fusion (LF) and laminoplasty (LP) are 2 sucessful posterior decompression techniques for cervical myelo-radiculopathy. There is also a growing body of evidence describing the importance of cervical sagittal alignment (CSA) and its importance in outcomes. We investigated the difference between pre- and postoperative CSA parameters in and between LF or LP. Furthermore, we studied predictive variables associated with change in cervical mismatch (CM). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of adults with cervical myeloradiculopathy in a single healthcare system. The primary outcomes are intra- and inter-cohort comparison of LF versus LP radiographic parameters at pre- and postoperative time points. A secondary multivariable analysis of predictive factors was performed evaluating factors predicting postoperative CM. RESULTS: Eighty nine patients were included; 38 (43%) had LF and 51 (57%) underwent LP. Both groups decreased in lordosis (LF 11.4° vs. 4.9°, P = 0.01; LP 15.2° vs. 9.1°, P < 0.001), increased in cSVA (LF 3.4 vs. 4.2 cm, P = 0.01; LP 3.2 vs. 4.2 cm, P < 0.001), and increased in CM (LF 22.0° vs. 28.5°, P = 0.02; LP 16.8° vs. 22.3°, P = 0.002). There were no significant differences in the postoperative CSA between groups. No significant predictors of change in pre- and postoperative CM were found. CONSLUSIONS: There were no significant pre-or postoperative differences following the 2 procedures, suggesting radiographic equipoise in well indicated patients. Across all groups, lordosis decreased, cSVA increased, and cervical mismatch increased. There were no predictive factors that led to change in cervical mismatch.

Three-column osteotomy in long constructs has lower rates of proximal junctional kyphosis and better restoration of lumbar lordosis than anterior column realignment.

PURPOSE: Three-column osteotomies (TCOs) and minimally invasive techniques such as anterior column realignment (ACR) are powerful tools used to restore lumbar lordosis and sagittal alignment. We aimed to appraise the differences in construct and global spinal stability between TCOs and ACRs in long constructs. METHODS: We identified consecutive patients who underwent a long construct lumbar or thoracolumbar fusion between January 2016 and November 2021. "Long construct" was any construct where the uppermost instrumented vertebra (UIV) was L2 or higher and the lowermost instrumented vertebra (LIV) was in the sacrum or ileum. RESULTS: We identified 69 patients; 14 (20.3%) developed PJK throughout follow-up (mean 838 days). Female patients were less likely to suffer PJK (p = 0.009). TCO was more associated with open (versus minimally invasive) screw/rod placement, greater number of levels, higher UIV, greater rate of instrumentation to the ilium, and posterior (versus anterior) L5-S1 interbody placement versus the ACR cohort (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.005, respectively). Patients who developed PJK were more likely to have undergone ACR (12 (32.4%) versus 2 (6.3%, p = 0.007)). The TCO cohort had better improvement of lumbar lordosis despite similar preoperative measurements (ACR: 16.8 ± 3.78°, TCO: 23.0 ± 5.02°, p = 0.046). Pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis mismatch had greater improvement after TCO (ACR: 14.8 ± 4.02°, TCO: 21.5 ± 5.10°, p = 0.042). By multivariate analysis, ACR increased odds of PJK by 6.1-times (95% confidence interval: 1.20-31.2, p = 0.29). CONCLUSION: In patients with long constructs who undergo ACR or TCO, we experienced a 20% rate of PJK. TCO decreased PJK 6.1-times compared to ACR. TCO demonstrated greater improvement of some spinopelvic parameters.

Sagittal Alignment in the Degenerative Lumbar Spine: Surgical Planning.

➤ Sagittal alignment of the spine has gained attention in the field of spinal deformity surgery for decades. However, emerging data support the importance of restoring segmental lumbar lordosis and lumbar spinal shape according to the pelvic morphology when surgically addressing degenerative lumbar pathologies such as degenerative disc disease and spondylolisthesis.➤ The distribution of caudal lordosis (L4-S1) and cranial lordosis (L1-L4) as a percentage of global lordosis varies by pelvic incidence (PI), with cephalad lordosis increasing its contribution to total lordosis as PI increases.➤ Spinal fusion may lead to iatrogenic deformity if performed without attention to lordosis magnitude and location in the lumbar spine.➤ A solid foundation of knowledge with regard to optimal spinal sagittal alignment is beneficial when performing lumbar spinal surgery, and thoughtful planning and execution of lumbar fusions with a focus on alignment may improve patient outcomes.

Development of ethnicity-adjusted global alignment and proportion score to predict the risk of mechanical complications following corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Surgery for degenerative scoliosis (DS) is a complex procedure with high complication and revision rates. Based on the concept that pelvic incidence (PI) is a constant parameter, the global alignment and proportional (GAP) score was developed from sagittal alignment data collected in the Caucasian populations to predict mechanical complications. However, the PI varies among different ethnic groups, and the GAP score may not apply to Chinese populations. Thus, this study aims to assess the predictability of the GAP score for mechanical complications in the Chinese populations and develop an ethnicity-adjusted GAP score. PURPOSE: To test the predictability of the original GAP score in the Chinese population and develop a Chinese ethnicity-tailored GAP scoring system. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGS: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENT SAMPLE: A total of 560 asymptomatic healthy volunteers were enrolled to develop Chinese ethnicity-tailored GAP (C-GAP) score and a total of 114 DS patients were enrolled to test the predictability of original GAP score and C-GAP score. OUTCOME MEASURES: Demographic information, sagittal spinopelvic parameters of healthy volunteers and DS patients were collected. Mechanical complications were recorded at a minimum of 2-year follow-up after corrective surgery for DS patients. METHODS: A total of 560 asymptomatic healthy volunteers with a mean age of 61.9±14.1 years were enrolled to develop ethnicity-adjusted GAP score. Besides, 114 surgically trated DS patients (M/F=10/104) with a mean age of 60.7±7.1 years were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data and radiological parameters of both groups, including PI, lumbar lordosis (LL), sacral slope (SS), the sagittal vertical axis (SVA), and global tilt (GT) were collected. Ideal LL, SS, and GT were obtained by calculating their correlation with PI of healthy volunteers using linear regression analysis. Relative pelvic version (RPV), relative lumbar lordosis (RLL), lordosis distribution index (LDI), and relative spinopelvic alignment (RSA) were obtained using the ideal parameters, and the Chinese population adjusted GAP score (C-GAP) was developed based on these values. The predictability of original and C-GAP for mechanical failure was evaluated using clinical and radiological data of DS patients by evaluating the area under the curve (AUC) using receiver operating characteristic curve. This study was supported the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (No. 82272545), ($ 8,000-10,000) and the Jiangsu Provincial Key Medical Center, and the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2021M701677), Level B ($ 5,000-7,000). RESULTS: Ideal SS=0.53×PI+9 (p=.002), ideal LL=0.48×PI+22 (p=.023) and ideal GT=0.46 × PI-9 (p=.011). were obtained by correlation analysis using sagittal parameters from those healthy volunteers, and RPV, RLL, RSA, and LDI were calculated accordingly. Then, the ethnicity-adjusted C-GAP score was developed by summing up the numeric value of calculated RPV, RLL, RSA, and LDI. The AUC was classified as ''no or low discriminatory power'' for the original GAP score in predicting mechanical complications (AUC=0.592, p=.078). Similarly, the original GAP score did not correlate with mechanical complications in DS patients. According to the C-GAP score, the sagittal parameters were proportional in 25 (21.9%) cases, moderately disproportional in 68 (59.6%), and severely disproportional in 21% (18.5%) cases. The incidence of mechanical complications was statistically different among proportioned and moderately disproportional and severely disproportional portions of the C-GAP score (p=.03). The predictability of the C-GAP score is high with an AUC=0.773 (p<.001). In addition, there is a linear correlation between mechanical complication rate and C-GAP score (χ=0.102, p=.02). CONCLUSION: The Ethnicity-adjusted C-GAP score system developed in the current study provided a more accurate and reliable for predicting the risk of mechanical complications after corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity.