Shared decision-making in the management of pulmonary nodules: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to explore the evidence regarding shared decision-making (SDM) in the management of pulmonary nodules. DESIGN: Systematic review of quantitative and qualitative studies. DATA SOURCE: Studies published in English or Chinese up to April 2022 were extracted from nine databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and CINAHL, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Data and SinoMed Data. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies were eligible if patients or healthcare providers are faced with pulmonary nodule management options or the interventions or experiences were focused on the patient-healthcare provider relationship or health education to make, increase or support shared decisions. All types of studies were included, including quantitative and qualitative studies. Grey literature and literature that had not been peer reviewed were excluded. Poster abstracts and non-empirical publications such as editorials, letters, opinion papers and review articles were excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts, assessed quality using Joanna Briggs Institute's critical appraisal tools, and extracted data from included studies. Thematic syntheses were used to identify prominent themes emerging from the data. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies met the inclusion criteria, 11 of which were conducted in USA. These included six qualitative studies and six quantitative studies (including both survey and quasi-experimental designs). Three major themes with specific subthemes emerged: (1) Opportunity (uncertainty in the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary nodules, willingness to participate in decision-making); (2) Ability (patient's lack of knowledge, physician's experience); and (3) Different worldview (misconception, distress among patients, preference for diagnosis and treatment). CONCLUSIONS: Uncertainty in the management of pulmonary nodules is the opportunity to implement SDM. Patients' lack of knowledge, distress, and misunderstandings between healthcare providers and patients are both the main obstacles and the causes of the application of SDM.

The diagnosis and management of multiple ground-glass nodules in the lung.

The prevalence of low-dose CT (LDCT) in lung cancer screening has gradually increased, and more and more lung ground glass nodules (GGNs) have been detected. So far, a consensus has been reached on the treatment of single pulmonary ground glass nodules, and there have been many guidelines that can be widely accepted. However, at present, more than half of the patients have more than one nodule when pulmonary ground glass nodules are found, which means that different treatment methods for nodules may have different effects on the prognosis or quality of life of patients. This article reviews the research progress in the diagnosis and treatment strategies of pulmonary multiple lesions manifested as GGNs.

[The role of endoscopy in the management of peripheral pulmonary nodules, part 2: Treatment]. / Place de l'endoscopie dans la gestion des nodules pulmonaires périphériques, partie 2 : traitement.

The management of peripheral lung nodules is challenging, requiring specialized skills and sophisticated technologies. The diagnosis now appears accessible to advanced endoscopy (see Part 1), which can also guide treatment of these nodules; this second part provides an overview of endoscopy techniques that can enhance surgical treatment through preoperative marking, and stereotactic radiotherapy treatment through fiduciary marker placement. Finally, we will discuss how, in the near future, these advanced endoscopic techniques will help to implement ablation strategy.

[Attach importance to the moderate diagnosis and treatment of multiple pulmonary nodules].

With the popularization of chest computed tomography examination in physical examination, the detection rate of multiple pulmonary nodules has significantly increased. However, there are no unified guidelines or consensus for the diagnosis and treatment of multiple pulmonary nodules, and the clinical diagnosis and treatment of such patients are often inadequate or excessive. Therefore, it is of great clinical significance to attach importance to the moderate diagnosis and treatment of multiple pulmonary nodules and formulate unified clinical practice standards for the prevention of lung cancer and the diagnosis and treatment of multiple pulmonary nodules.

The Thoracic Research Evaluation and Treatment 2.0 Model: A Lung Cancer Prediction Model for Indeterminate Nodules Referred for Specialist Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Appropriate risk stratification of indeterminate pulmonary nodules (IPNs) is necessary to direct diagnostic evaluation. Currently available models were developed in populations with lower cancer prevalence than that seen in thoracic surgery and pulmonology clinics and usually do not allow for missing data. We updated and expanded the Thoracic Research Evaluation and Treatment (TREAT) model into a more generalized, robust approach for lung cancer prediction in patients referred for specialty evaluation. RESEARCH QUESTION: Can clinic-level differences in nodule evaluation be incorporated to improve lung cancer prediction accuracy in patients seeking immediate specialty evaluation compared with currently available models? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Clinical and radiographic data on patients with IPNs from six sites (N = 1,401) were collected retrospectively and divided into groups by clinical setting: pulmonary nodule clinic (n = 374; cancer prevalence, 42%), outpatient thoracic surgery clinic (n = 553; cancer prevalence, 73%), or inpatient surgical resection (n = 474; cancer prevalence, 90%). A new prediction model was developed using a missing data-driven pattern submodel approach. Discrimination and calibration were estimated with cross-validation and were compared with the original TREAT, Mayo Clinic, Herder, and Brock models. Reclassification was assessed with bias-corrected clinical net reclassification index and reclassification plots. RESULTS: Two-thirds of patients had missing data; nodule growth and fluorodeoxyglucose-PET scan avidity were missing most frequently. The TREAT version 2.0 mean area under the receiver operating characteristic curve across missingness patterns was 0.85 compared with that of the original TREAT (0.80), Herder (0.73), Mayo Clinic (0.72), and Brock (0.68) models with improved calibration. The bias-corrected clinical net reclassification index was 0.23. INTERPRETATION: The TREAT 2.0 model is more accurate and better calibrated for predicting lung cancer in high-risk IPNs than the Mayo, Herder, or Brock models. Nodule calculators such as TREAT 2.0 that account for varied lung cancer prevalence and that consider missing data may provide more accurate risk stratification for patients seeking evaluation at specialty nodule evaluation clinics.

A 3D Digital Model for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Nodules.

The three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of pulmonary nodules using medical images has introduced new technical approaches for diagnosing and treating pulmonary nodules, and these approaches are progressively being acknowledged and adopted by physicians and patients. Nonetheless, constructing a relatively universal 3D digital model of pulmonary nodules for diagnosis and treatment is challenging due to device differences, shooting times, and nodule types. The objective of this study is to propose a new 3D digital model of pulmonary nodules that serves as a bridge between physicians and patients and is also a cutting-edge tool for pre-diagnosis and prognostic evaluation. Many AI-driven pulmonary nodule detection and recognition methods employ deep learning techniques to capture the radiological features of pulmonary nodules, and these methods can achieve a good area under-the-curve (AUC) performance. However, false positives and false negatives remain a challenge for radiologists and clinicians. The interpretation and expression of features from the perspective of pulmonary nodule classification and examination are still unsatisfactory. In this study, a method of continuous 3D reconstruction of the whole lung in horizontal and coronal positions is proposed by combining existing medical image processing technologies. Compared with other applicable methods, this method allows users to rapidly locate pulmonary nodules and identify their fundamental properties while also observing pulmonary nodules from multiple perspectives, thereby providing a more effective clinical tool for diagnosing and treating pulmonary nodules.

High risk lung nodule: A multidisciplinary approach to diagnosis and management.

Pulmonary nodules are often discovered incidentally during CT scans performed for other reasons. While the vast majority of nodules are benign, a small percentage may represent early-stage lung cancer with the potential for curative treatments. With the growing use of CT for both clinical purposes and lung cancer screening, the number of pulmonary nodules detected is expected to increase substantially. Despite well-established guidelines, many nodules do not receive proper evaluation due to a variety of factors, including inadequate coordination of care and financial and social barriers. To address this quality gap, novel approaches such as multidisciplinary nodule clinics and multidisciplinary boards may be necessary. As pulmonary nodules may indicate early-stage lung cancer, it is crucial to adopt a risk-stratified approach to identify potential lung cancers at an early stage, while minimizing the risk of harm and expense associated with over investigation of low-risk nodules. This article, authored by multiple specialists involved in nodule management, delves into the diagnostic approach to lung nodules. It covers the process of determining whether a patient requires tissue sampling or continued surveillance. Additionally, the article provides an in-depth examination of the various biopsy and therapeutic options available for malignant lung nodules. The article also emphasizes the significance of early detection in reducing lung cancer mortality, especially among high-risk populations. Furthermore, it addresses the creation of a comprehensive lung nodule program, which involves smoking cessation, lung cancer screening, and systematic evaluation and follow-up of both incidental and screen-detected nodules.

Recent advances in nonsurgical treatment of pulmonary ground-glass nodules.

Since the 1990s, low-dose computed tomography technology has been used in lung cancer screening. With the increase of computed tomography screening, the detection rate of ground-glass nodules (GGN) has increased dramatically. At present, the main treatment strategy for GGN is surgical resection. However, for patients with poor cardiopulmonary functions, a history of lung resection, multiple pulmonary nodules, or the age of >75 years, surgical resection is very difficult and not medically encouraged. This article reviews the applications and outcomes evaluation of nonsurgical treatments, such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, moleculartargeted drug therapy, immunity therapy, and image-guided thermal ablation in patients with GGN.

Management of Incidental Pulmonary Nodules: Influencing Patient Care Through Subspecialized Imaging Review.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether thoracic radiologist review of computed tomography-detected incidental pulmonary nodules initially reported by non-thoracic imagers would change management recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Radiology Consultation Service identified 468 computed tomography scans (one per patient) performed through the adult emergency department from August 2018 through December 2020 that mentioned the presence of a pulmonary nodule. Forty percent (186/468) were read by thoracic radiologists and 60% (282/468) were read by non-thoracic radiologists. The Radiology Consultation Service contacted all patients in order to assess risk factors for lung malignancy. Sixty-seven patients were excluded because they were unreachable, declined participation, or were actively followed by a pulmonologist or oncologist. A thoracic radiologist assessed the nodule and follow up recommendations in all remaining cases. RESULTS: A total of 215 cases were re-reviewed by thoracic radiologists. The thoracic radiologist disagreed with the initial nodule recommendations in 38% (82/215) of cases and agreed in 62% (133/215) of cases. All discordant cases resulted in a change in management by the thoracic radiologist with approximately one-third (33%, 27/82) decreasing imaging utilization and two-thirds (67%, 55/82) increasing imaging utilization. Nodules were deemed benign and follow up eliminated in 11% (9/82) of discordant cases. DISCUSSION: Our study illustrates that nodule review by thoracic radiologists results in a change in management in a large percentage of patients. Continued research is needed to determine whether subspecialty imaging review results in increased or more timely lung cancer detection.

Evaluating the Patient With a Pulmonary Nodule: A Review.

IMPORTANCE: Pulmonary nodules are identified in approximately 1.6 million patients per year in the US and are detected on approximately 30% of computed tomographic (CT) images of the chest. Optimal treatment of an individual with a pulmonary nodule can lead to early detection of cancer while minimizing testing for a benign nodule. OBSERVATIONS: At least 95% of all pulmonary nodules identified are benign, most often granulomas or intrapulmonary lymph nodes. Smaller nodules are more likely to be benign. Pulmonary nodules are categorized as small solid (<8 mm), larger solid (≥8 mm), and subsolid. Subsolid nodules are divided into ground-glass nodules (no solid component) and part-solid (both ground-glass and solid components). The probability of malignancy is less than 1% for all nodules smaller than 6 mm and 1% to 2% for nodules 6 mm to 8 mm. Nodules that are 6 mm to 8 mm can be followed with a repeat chest CT in 6 to 12 months, depending on the presence of patient risk factors and imaging characteristics associated with lung malignancy, clinical judgment about the probability of malignancy, and patient preferences. The treatment of an individual with a solid pulmonary nodule 8 mm or larger is based on the estimated probability of malignancy; the presence of patient comorbidities, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and coronary artery disease; and patient preferences. Management options include surveillance imaging, defined as monitoring for nodule growth with chest CT imaging, positron emission tomography-CT imaging, nonsurgical biopsy with bronchoscopy or transthoracic needle biopsy, and surgical resection. Part-solid pulmonary nodules are managed according to the size of the solid component. Larger solid components are associated with a higher risk of malignancy. Ground-glass pulmonary nodules have a probability of malignancy of 10% to 50% when they persist beyond 3 months and are larger than 10 mm in diameter. A malignant nodule that is entirely ground glass in appearance is typically slow growing. Current bronchoscopy and transthoracic needle biopsy methods yield a sensitivity of 70% to 90% for a diagnosis of lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Pulmonary nodules are identified in approximately 1.6 million people per year in the US and approximately 30% of chest CT images. The treatment of an individual with a pulmonary nodule should be guided by the probability that the nodule is malignant, safety of testing, the likelihood that additional testing will be informative, and patient preferences.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for T4 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Additional Ipsilateral Lung Nodules.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant chemotherapy is indicated for patients with resectable stage II and IIIa non-small cell lung cancer. With the revised definition of T4 tumors with nodules in a different ipsilateral lobe, the survival advantage imparted by adjuvant chemotherapy has yet to be defined. We evaluated the role of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with T4 disease characterized by additional tumor nodules in a different ipsilateral lobe treated with surgical resection. METHODS: We identified patients with T4 disease and additional tumor nodules in a different ipsilateral lobe treated with surgical resection alone or with adjuvant chemotherapy in the National Cancer Database between 2010 and 2016. The primary outcome was 3-year overall survival (OS). RESULTS: A total of 920 patients with T4 tumors and additional tumor nodules in a different ipsilateral lobe were identified. We excluded patients with lymph node metastases, tumors 4 cm or greater, and local invasion. Of the remaining 373 patients, 152 received surgery and adjuvant multiagent chemotherapy whereas 221 received surgery alone. When adjusted for patient, tumor, and treatment factors, the use of adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved 3-year OS compared with surgery alone (hazard ratio = 0.572; 95% confidence interval, 0.348-0.940; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with T4 non-small cell lung cancer with additional tumor nodules in a different ipsilateral lobe is associated with improved 3-year OS. Accurate identification of T4 disease is important to define patients in whom adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered. Further prospective study is needed to delineate further the use of adjuvant chemotherapy for this patient population.

A cross-sectional study of psychological burden in Chinese patients with pulmonary nodules: Prevalence and impact on the management of nodules.

BACKGROUND: Uncertainty after the detection of pulmonary nodules (PNs) can cause psychological burden. We designed this study to quantitatively evaluate the prevalence, severity and possible impact of this burden on the preference of patients for management of nodules. METHODS: The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) was used to evaluate psychological burden in patients. An independent t-test and a Mann-Whitney U test were used to determine the significance of differences between groups in continuous variables. A chi-square test was used to determine the significance of difference between groups in categorical variables. RESULTS: A total of 334 inpatients diagnosed with PNs were included in the study. A total of 17.96% of the participates screened positive for anxiety and 14.67% for depression. Female patients had significantly higher positive rates of both anxiety and depression screenings than male patients (21.57% vs. 12.31%, p = 0.032 and 18.05% vs. 9.30%, p = 0.028, respectively). Among patients screened positive for anxiety, the proportion of those who chose more aggressive management was significantly higher (34/60 vs. 113/274, p = 0.029). The rate of benign or precursor disease resected was significantly higher in patients with more aggressive management (46.94% vs. 9.63%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety and depression are common in Chinese patients with PNs. Patients with positive HADS anxiety screening results are more likely to adopt more aggressive management that leads to a higher rate of benign or precursor disease resected/biopsied. This study alerts clinicians to the need to assess and possibly treat emotional responses.

Computed tomography-guided percutaneous microwave ablation for pulmonary multiple ground-glass opacities.

With the wide application of low-dose computed tomography (CT) and high-resolution CT, the increasing cases of pulmonary nodules are identified through routine thoracic imaging examination, many of which are presented as multiple ground-glass opacities (GGOs). The multiple GGOs could be divided into four pathological types and usually got different combined mutation patterns, suggesting that each GGO is an independent event and should be treated separately. However, there is no established guideline to the treatment of multiple GGOs so far. Here, we report a multiple GGOs case with a different mutation pattern treated by CT-guided percutaneous microwave ablation.

Cost-Effectiveness of Treatment Thresholds for Subsolid Pulmonary Nodules in CT Lung Cancer Screening.

Background Guidelines such as the Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS) are available for determining when subsolid nodules should be treated within lung cancer screening programs, but they are based on expert opinion. Purpose To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of varying treatment thresholds for subsolid nodules within a lung cancer screening setting by using a simulation model. Materials and Methods A previously developed model simulated 10 million current and former smokers undergoing CT lung cancer screening who were assumed to have a ground-glass nodule (GGN) at baseline. Nodules were allowed to grow and to develop solid components over time according to a monthly cycle and lifetime horizon. Management strategies generated by varying treatment thresholds, including the solid component size and use of the Brock risk calculator, were tested. For each strategy, average U.S. costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained per patient were computed, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) of those on the efficient frontier were calculated. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses of results were performed by varying several relevant parameters, such as treatment costs or malignancy growth rates. Results Variants of the Lung-RADS guidelines that did not treat pure GGNs were cost-effective. Strategies based on the Brock risk calculator did not reach the efficient frontier. The strategy with the highest QALYs under a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100 000 per QALY included no treatment of GGNs and a threshold of 4-mm solid component size for treatment of subsolid nodules. This strategy yielded an ICER of $52 993 per QALY (95% CI: 44 407, 64 372). Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed this was the optimal strategy under a range of parameter variations. Conclusion Treatment of pure ground-glass nodules was not cost-effective. Strategies that use modifications of the Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System guidelines were cost-effective for treating part-solid nodules; an optimal threshold of 4 mm for the solid component yielded the most quality-adjusted life years. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Development and Validation of Machine Learning-based Model for the Prediction of Malignancy in Multiple Pulmonary Nodules: Analysis from Multicentric Cohorts.

PURPOSE: Nodule evaluation is challenging and critical to diagnose multiple pulmonary nodules (MPNs). We aimed to develop and validate a machine learning-based model to estimate the malignant probability of MPNs to guide decision-making. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A boosted ensemble algorithm (XGBoost) was used to predict malignancy using the clinicoradiologic variables of 1,739 nodules from 520 patients with MPNs at a Chinese center. The model (PKU-M model) was trained using 10-fold cross-validation in which hyperparameters were selected and fine-tuned. The model was validated and compared with solitary pulmonary nodule (SPN) models, clinicians, and a computer-aided diagnosis (CADx) system in an independent transnational cohort and a prospective multicentric cohort. RESULTS: The PKU-M model showed excellent discrimination [area under the curve; AUC (95% confidence interval (95% CI)), 0.909 (0.854-0.946)] and calibration (Brier score, 0.122) in the development cohort. External validation (583 nodules) revealed that the AUC of the PKU-M model was 0.890 (0.859-0.916), higher than those of the Brock model [0.806 (0.771-0.838)], PKU model [0.780 (0.743-0.817)], Mayo model [0.739 (0.697-0.776)], and VA model [0.682 (0.640-0.722)]. Prospective comparison (200 nodules) showed that the AUC of the PKU-M model [0.871 (0.815-0.915)] was higher than that of surgeons [0.790 (0.711-0.852), 0.741 (0.662-0.804), and 0.727 (0.650-0.788)], radiologist [0.748 (0.671-0.814)], and the CADx system [0.757 (0.682-0.818)]. Furthermore, the model outperformed the clinicians with an increase of 14.3% in sensitivity and 7.8% in specificity. CONCLUSIONS: After its development using machine learning algorithms, validation using transnational multicentric cohorts, and prospective comparison with clinicians and the CADx system, this novel prediction model for MPNs presented solid performance as a convenient reference to help decision-making.

Management of Pulmonary Nodules in Oncologic Patients: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review.

Cancer survivors are at higher risk than the general population for development of a new primary malignancy, most commonly lung cancer. Current lung cancer screening guidelines recommend low-dose chest CT for high-risk individuals, including patients with a history of cancer and a qualifying smoking history. However, major lung cancer screening trials have inconsistently included cancer survivors, and few studies have assessed management of lung nodules in this population. This narrative review highlights relevant literature and provides expert opinion for management of pulmonary nodules detected incidentally or by screening in oncologic patients. In patients with previously treated lung cancer, a new nodule most likely represents distant metastasis from the initial lung cancer or a second primary lung cancer; CT features such as nodule size and composition should guide decisions regarding biopsy, PET/CT, and CT surveillance. In patients with extrapulmonary cancers, nodule management requires individualized risk assessment; smoking is associated with increased odds of primary lung cancer, whereas specific primary cancer types are associated with increased odds of pulmonary metastasis. Nonneoplastic causes, such as infection, medication toxicity, and postradiation or postsurgical change, should also be considered. Future prospective studies are warranted to provide evidence-based data to assist clinical decision-making in this context.

Shades of Gray: Subsolid Nodule Considerations and Management.

Subsolid nodules are common on chest CT imaging and may be either benign or malignant. Their varied features and broad differential diagnoses present management challenges. Although subsolid nodules often represent lung adenocarcinomas, other possibilities are common and influence management. Practice guidelines exist for subsolid nodule management for both incidentally and screening-detected nodules, incorporating patient and nodule characteristics. This review highlights the similarities and differences among these algorithms, with the intent of providing a resource for comparison and aid in choosing management options.