Prevalence, characteristics and risk factors of birth defects in central China livebirths, 2015-2022.

Objective: This study analyzed the prevalence, epidemiological characteristics and risk factors of birth defects among livebirths in central China, aiming to provide evidences for the prevention of birth defects and government Decision-makings. Methods: Birth data from China's Hubei Province between 2015 and 2022 were collected, including basic information of the livebirths, the mothers and the fathers, as well as information about delivery and each prenatal examination. The livebirths prevalence of birth defects was calculated and the trends were mapped. The basic characteristics of birth defects were evaluated by the difference analysis between case and health groups. Univariate and multivariate Poisson regression was performed to examine the independent risk factors for birth defects. Results: Among 43,568 livebirths, 166 livebirths were born with birth defects, resulted in a total prevalence rate of 3.81 per 1,000 livebirths, showing a remarkable uptrend from 0.41per 1,000 livebirths in 2015 to 9.23 per 1,000 livebirths in 2022. The peak of the prevalence was in January and February. Congenital malformation of the musculoskeletal system was the main type of birth defect in central China livebirths, followed by cleft lip and cleft palate. Overall, newborns with birth defect had significantly earlier delivery gestational age, poorer health and higher proportion of infants with low birth weight than healthy births. The gender of livebirths, excess weight at delivery (≥80 kg) of mothers, more than 2 times of gravidity or parity of mothers, and advanced paternal age (≥40 years) were independent risk factors for birth defects (or specific birth defects). Conclusion: The livebirths prevalence of birth defects shows increasing trend in central China, which deserves the attention of the government and would-be parents. Elevated paternal age, excess maternal weight, gravidity and parity should be considered when planning their families.

Identifying key predictive features for live birth rate in advanced maternal age patients undergoing single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer.

BACKGROUND: Infertility affects one in six couples worldwide, with advanced maternal age (AMA) posing unique challenges due to diminished ovarian reserve and reduced oocyte quality. Single vitrified-warmed blastocyst transfer (SVBT) has shown promise in assisted reproductive technology (ART), but success rates in AMA patients remain suboptimal. This study aimed to identify and refine predictive factors for live birth following SVBT in AMA patients, with the goal of enhancing clinical decision-making and enabling personalized treatment strategies. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 1,168 SVBT cycles conducted between June 2016 and December 2022 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University and Nanning Maternity and Child Health Hospital. Nineteen machine-learning models were applied to identify key predictive factors for live birth. Feature selection and 10-fold cross-validation were employed to validate the models. RESULTS: The most significant predictors of live birth included inner cell mass quality, trophectoderm quality, number of oocytes retrieved, endometrial thickness, and the presence of 8-cell blastomeres on day 3. The stacking model demonstrated the best predictive performance (AUC: 0.791), followed by Extra Trees (AUC: 0.784) and Random Forest (AUC: 0.768). These models outperformed traditional methods, achieving superior accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity. CONCLUSION: Leveraging advanced machine-learning models and identifying critical predictive factors can improve the accuracy of live birth outcome predictions for AMA patients undergoing SVBT. These findings offer valuable insights for enhancing clinical decision-making and managing patient expectations. Further research is needed to validate these results in larger, multi-center cohorts and to explore additional factors, including fresh embryo transfers, to broaden the applicability of these models in clinical practice.

Impact of letrozole co-treatment in an antagonist protocol for IVF/ICSI: a retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to investigate the impact of combined use of letrozole in an antagonist protocol during IVF on live birth outcomes and to assess the safety of letrozole in terms of maternal and neonatal complications. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included women undergoing IVF/ICSI and fresh embryo transfer (ET) treatment with and without letrozole co-treatment from 2007 to 2021 at Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital (Shanghai, China). The primary outcome was the live birth rate, while the incidences of maternal and neonatal complications were secondary outcomes. Logistic regression models were used to estimate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the analyzed outcomes. Sensitivity analysis was performed using a propensity score-based patient-matching (PSM) model, an inverse probability weighting (IPW) model, logistic regression models with women undergoing their first IVF-ET cycle, and subgroup analysis. RESULTS: Of the 4780 women enrolled in the study, 3887 underwent an antagonist protocol for ovarian stimulation, while 893 received letrozole co-treatment. In this cohort, letrozole co-treatment demonstrated comparable live birth rates to the use of antagonist protocol alone (logistic regression: aOR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.71-1.08; PSM: aOR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.77-1.22; IPW: aOR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.71-1.10). Notably, individuals with a body mass index (BMI) exceeding 24 and those with high ovarian response experienced higher live birth rates under the letrozole co-treatment regimen (BMI ≥ 24: aOR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.14-3.00; high response: aOR, 1.60; 95% CI, 1.02-2.50). Letrozole co-treatment was also associated with decreased risks of gestational diabetes (aOR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.15-0.69) and small for gestational age (SGA) fetuses (aOR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.22-0.75) in fresh ET cycles. These finding were robust in both PSM and IPW models. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggested that letrozole co-treatment in antagonist protocol for IVF/ICSI was associated with a comparable live birth rate following fresh ET. Further prospective randomized studies are needed to verify our results.

Does hCG-trigger in the mild stimulation protocol for endometrial preparation have any effect on pregnancy outcome in frozen-thawed embryo transfer?

BACKGROUND: Recent literature has explored the role of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) triggering in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles with natural endometrial preparation. Despite this, the impact of hCG triggering on pregnancy outcomes following endometrial preparation with mild stimulation (mST) using Letrozole and Gonadotropins remains inadequately characterized. This study aimed to elucidate the effects of hCG-trigger on pregnancy outcomes in mST-FET cycles. METHODS: In the present retrospective cohort study, the pregnancy outcomes of 409 eligible patients who underwent FET cycles with endometrial preparation using a mild ovarian stimulation protocol by letrozole plus low dose gonadotropins at the Royan Institute between 2020 and 2022, were investigated. The study population were segregated into two distinct groups according to type of ovulation: the spontaneous ovulation group (n = 138) and the hCG-trigger group (n = 271). The pregnancy outcomes including implantation and clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) and live birth rates (LBR) were compared between two groups. The multivariable logistic regression was performed to detect the most significant variables related to the LBR in the mST-FET cycles. RESULTS: Demographic and baseline characteristics were comparable between groups. No significant difference was found in terms of implantation rate (0.65 ± 0.32 vs. 0.60 ± 0.30, P-value: 0.31), CPR (37% vs. 39.7%, P-value: 0.53), and LBR (35.5% vs. 37.3%, P-value: 0.74) in the spontaneous ovulation and hCG-trigger groups, respectively. The logistic regression analysis revealed that only the stage of the transferred embryo exhibited a significant relationship with LBR (blastocyst vs. cleavage: odds ratio (OR); 2.33, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.41-3.86, P-value = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Pregnancy outcomes in the mST-FET cycles, including implantation rate, CPR, and LBR are comparable in cycles with or without hCG triggering. Based on the findings from multivariate regression analysis, the sole significant predictive factor for the LBR was the transfer of blastocyst embryos. It is recommended that these results be examined and discussed in future prospective studies with a larger sample size, considering the lack of comparable research in this field.

The PPOS protocol mitigates the detrimental effects of high BMI on embryo and clinical pregnancy outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The impact of high body mass index (BMI) on embryo and pregnancy outcomes in women using the PPOS (progestin-primed ovarian stimulation) protocol during their first frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles is not clear. This study is to investigate the impact of BMI on oocyte, embryo, and pregnancy outcomes in patients who underwent the PPOS protocol. METHODS: This retrospective study included the first FET cycle of 22,392 patients following the PPOS protocol. The impact of BMI on oocyte and pregnancy outcomes was assessed across different BMI groups, using direct acyclic graph to determine covariates, followed by the application of multiple linear and logistic regressions to further validate this influence. RESULTS: The high BMI groups exhibited a higher number of oocytes; however, no significant differences were observed in good-quality embryos, clinical pregnancy rate, and implantation rate. Nevertheless, the high BMI groups demonstrated a significantly elevated miscarriage rate (9.9% vs. 12.2% vs. 15.7% vs. 18.3%, P < 0.001), particularly in late miscarriages, resulting in lower live birth rates (LBR, 41.1% vs. 40.2% vs. 37.3% vs. 36.2%, P = 0.001). These findings were further confirmed through multiple liner and logistic regression analyses. Additionally, several maternal factors showed significant associations with adjusted odds ratios for early miscarriage. However, women with a BMI ≥ 24 who underwent hormone replacement cycle or hMG late stimulation protocol for endometrial preparation experienced an increased risk of late miscarriage. CONCLUSIONS: By utilizing the PPOS protocol, women with a high BMI exhibit comparable outcomes in terms of embryo and clinical pregnancies. However, an elevated BMI is associated with an increased risk of miscarriage, leading to a lower LBR. Adopting appropriate endometrial preparation protocols such as natural cycles and letrozole stimulation cycles may potentially offer benefits in reducing miscarriages.

Is there a relationship between morphokinetic parameters and obstetrical complications? An analysis of singleton live births after single fresh embryo transfer.

BACKGROUND: With the advancement in embryology and the introduction of time-lapse monitoring system, the embryologists' goal might be to find not only the embryo with the highest probability of live birth, but also the embryo with the highest probability to progress to a healthy full-term delivery. Thus, we aimed to investigate the association between morphokinetic time-lapse parameters and obstetrical and perinatal complications. METHODS: A cohort study reviewing fertility and delivery files of all singletone births from IVF patients whose embryos were cultured in a time-lapse monitoring system and had a single fresh embryo transfer at our center between 2013-2019. We conducted multiple comparisons between complicated and uncomplicated pregnancies of each perinatal complication, including: gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM); small for gestational age (SGA); pre-eclamptic toxemia (PET); preterm labor < 37 weeks of gestation (PTL); and third stage of labor complications. A comparison between pregnancies with and without a composite outcome of placental complications including GDM, SGA, PET and PTL was also conducted. Baseline characteristics, treatment and morphokinetic parameters in complicated and uncomplicated gestations were compared. Logistic regression analysis was utilized to adjust results for potential confounders. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-six single embryo transfers resulted in 176 live births. Morphokinetic time-lapse parameters were similar between the groups, except for a shorter time to full blastulation in the SGA group (tB-tPNf = 75.5 ± 1.3 h vs. 79.5 ± 4.8 in the non-SGA group, p < 0.001), and shorter third cell cycle duration in the PET group (CC3 = 12.4 ± 1.1 h vs. 13.6 ± 2.9 in the non-PET group, p = 0.02). On multivariate regression analysis, none of the morphokinetic parameters were found to be significantly correlated with any of the perinatal complications. CONCLUSION: Time-lapse morphokinetic parameters of the embryo transferred are not associated with adverse obstetric and perinatal outcomes.

Two-year cumulative live-birth rates and maximum number of transfer cycles in women aged ≥ 40 years.

This retrospective study aimed to clarify the cumulative live-birth rates (CLBRs) and cost per live-birth (LB) to evaluate the validity of frozen-thawed embryo transfer without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) in women aged ≥ 40 years. The study included 1,011 patients aged ≥ 40 years who underwent their first oocyte retrieval at our hospital between January 2010 and September 2017. They were followed up for up to two years or until either treatment discontinuation or a pregnancy that resulted in a live birth. The 2-year CLBRs were 55.6%, 39.0%, 31.3%, 19.1%, 10.6%, 4.4%, and 0% for patients aged 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, and > 46 years, respectively. In approximately 80% of LB cases, patients aged 40-42 years and 43-44 years became pregnant by the fourth and second transfers, respectively. Costs per LB were $30,207, $49,034, $66,345, $102,759, and $195,862 for patients aged 40, 41, 42, 43, and 44, respectively. Cost per LB for each number of transfers reached $300,000 and $ 450,000 for the third transfer at 42 and 43 years of age, respectively. For cost-effectiveness, up to two ET cycles are recommended for patients aged 42-43, and none for patients aged ≥ 44 years.

Retrospective evaluation of obstetric processes in patients with Familial Mediterranean Fever's disease: The three years experience of a tertiary rheumatology clinic.

OBJECTIVES: Familial Mediterranean Fever (FMF) is a hereditary autoinflammatory disease affecting both genders in reproductive age. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relation between FMF and pregnancy on both maternal and fetal aspects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective, single-center, descriptive study we analysed total of 95 pregnancies of 40 FMF patients. Clinical and demographic data were obtained from patients' records. To prevent recall bias, only the last pregnancy of each patient was evaluated for disease activity and use or revision of medications during pregnancy. RESULTS: The median age of the patients at diagnosis was 22 and the first pregnancy age was 26 years. The median duration of FMF at last pregnancy was 8 (0-23) years. Eight (20%) patients had at least 1 pregnancy via assisted reproductive techniques (IVF), while 34 (85%) patients had at least 1 spontaneous pregnancy. While 32 patients were in remission (80%) before pregnancy, 8 were clinically active (20%). Improvement in clinical course and attack frequency during pregnancy was observed in 23 patients (57.5%), stable course in 10 (25.0%), and worsening in 7 (17.5%). The rate of live birth was 70.0%, abortus was 28.9%, preterm labor was 8.1%, pre-eclampsia was 5.0%, and only 1 achondroplasia as congenital fetal abnormality was observed. CONCLUSION: FMF did not constitute a contraindication for pregnancy. The most important obstetric problems, complications, and negative fetal outcomes in the course of pregnancy are increased IVF requirement, abortion, and cesarean rates. There is no increase in the risk of congenital malformations due to FMF itself or use of colchicine.

Identify high-risk DOR women ≤ 35 years old following assisted reproduction technology through cutoffs of anti-mullerian hormone and antral follicle counts.

BACKGROUND: Females with diminished ovarian reserve (DOR) have significantly lower cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) than females with normal ovarian reserve. A subset of young infertile patients, whose ovarian reserve is declining but has not yet met the POSEIDON criteria for DOR, has not received the attention it merited. These individuals have not been identified in a timely manner prior to the initiation of assisted reproductive technology (ART), leading to suboptimal clinical pregnancy outcomes. We categorized this overlooked cohort as the "high-risk DOR" group. OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to identify high-risk DOR patients through anti-Mullerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle counts (AFCs). METHODS: A total of 10037 young women (≤ 35 years old) who underwent their first initial oocyte aspiration cycle at a single reproductive medicine center were included and further classified into three groups, based on the thresholds for AMH and AFC established through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and in alignment with the POSEIDON criteria. Two ROC analyses were performed to identify the cutoff values of AMH and AFC to obtain one viable embryo (one top-quality embryo or one viable blastocyst). The cutoffs of ROC were measured by sensitivity and specificity. The primary outcome was the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) per oocyte aspiration cycle. The secondary outcomes included the number of oocytes retrieved and the number of viable embryos formed. Pearson's chi-square tests were conducted to compare the clinical outcomes among the three groups. Furthermore, univariate logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the associations between ovarian reserve and clinical outcomes. All of the above comparisons between the high-risk DOR and NOR were further confirmed by propensity score matching (PSM) (1:1 nearest-neighbor matching, with a caliper width of 0.02). RESULTS: According to the ROC analyses and POSEIDON criteria, the present study identified a population of high-risk DOR patients (1.20 ng/mL < AMH values < 2.50 ng/mL, with 6 ≤ AFC ≤ 10; n = 682), and their outcomes were further compared to those of DOR patients (positive control, AMH values ≤ 1.2 ng/mL, and/or AFC ≤ 5; n = 1153) and of NOR patients (negative control, 2.5 ng/mL ≤ AMH values ≤ 5.5 ng/mL, and 11 ≤ AFC ≤ 20; n = 2649). Patients in the high-risk DOR group had significantly lower CLBRs than those in the NOR group (p < 0.001) but higher CLBRs than those in the DOR group (p < 0.001). Logistic regression further demonstrated that high-risk DOR was associated with a lower likelihood of cumulative live birth chance (OR 0.401, 95% CI: 0.332-0.486, p < 0.001) than NOR was, with a greater likelihood of cumulative live birth chance (OR 1.911, 95% CI:1.558-2.344, p < 0.001) than DOR was. To investigate the effects of embryo development stage, the outcomes of D3 embryos and blastocysts were analyzed separately. Significant differences in pregnancy outcomes were detected only in D3 embryo ET cycles among the three groups (high-risk DOR vs. NOR, all p < 0.05; DOR vs. NOR, all p < 0.05). DOR/high-risk DOR did not influence the pregnancy loss rates or pregnancy outcomes (clinical pregnancy rates and ongoing pregnancy rates) per positive HCG cycle (all p > 0.05). After PSM, the differences in ovarian response and pregnancy outcomes between the high-risk DOR and NOR groups were consistent with the results before PSM. CONCLUSION(S): Our study revealed that the CLBR of the high-risk DOR patients was significantly lower than that of females with normal ovarian reserve and greater than that of females with DOR. The values of AMH ranging from 1.2 to 2.5 and AFC ranging from 6 to 10 appeared to constitute meaningful thresholds in females with mildly reduced ovarian reserve.

Comparison of total prevalence, perinatal prevalence, and livebirth prevalence of birth defects in Hunan Province, China, 2016-2020.

Objective: Birth defect of any type is undesirable and often pose a negative impact on the health and development of the newborn. Birth defects surveillance with datasets from surveillance health-related programs are useful to predict the pattern of birth defects and take preventive measures. In this study, the total prevalence, perinatal prevalence, and livebirth prevalence of birth defects were compared. Methods: Data were obtained from the Birth Defects Surveillance System in Hunan Province, China, 2016-2020. The total prevalence is the number of birth defects (including livebirths, stillbirths, and selective terminations of pregnancy) per 1,000 births (including livebirths and stillbirths). The perinatal prevalence is the number of birth defects (between 28 weeks gestation and 7 days postpartum) per 1,000 births. The livebirth prevalence is the number of liveborn birth defects per 1,000 births (unit: ‰). Underestimated proportion (unit: %) is the reduction level of perinatal prevalence or livebirth prevalence compared to the total prevalence. Prevalence with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was calculated using the log-binomial method. Chi-square tests (χ 2) were used to examine if significant differences existed in prevalence or underestimated proportion between different groups. Results: A total of 847,755 births were included in this study, and 23,420 birth defects were identified, including 14,459 (61.74%) birth defects with gestational age > =28 weeks, and 11,465 (48.95%) birth defects in livebirths. The total prevalence, perinatal prevalence, and livebirth prevalence of birth defects were 27.63‰ (95%CI, 27.27-27.98), 17.06‰ (95%CI, 16.78-17.33), and 13.52‰ (95%CI, 13.28-13.77), respectively, and significant differences existed between them (χ2 = 4798.55, p < 0.01). Compared to the total prevalence, the perinatal prevalence and livebirth prevalence were underestimated by 38.26 and 51.05%, respectively. Significant differences existed between the total prevalence, perinatal prevalence, and livebirth prevalence of birth defects in all subgroups according to year, sex, residence, and maternal age (p < 0.05). Significant differences existed between the total prevalence, perinatal prevalence, and livebirth prevalence for 17 specific defects: congenital heart defect, cleft lip-palate, Down syndrome, talipes equinovarus, hydrocephalus, limb reduction, cleft lip, omphalocele, anal atresia, anencephaly, spina bifida, diaphragmatic hernia, encephalocele, gastroschisis, esophageal atresia, bladder exstrophy, and conjoined twins (p < 0.05). In comparison, no significant difference existed between the total prevalence, perinatal prevalence, and livebirth prevalence for 6 specific defects: polydactyly, other external ear defects, syndactyly, hypospadias, cleft palate, and anotia/microtia (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The total prevalence and livebirth prevalence of birth defects in Hunan Province, China, was not well studied. A systematic study was conducted to compare the total prevalence, perinatal prevalence, and livebirth prevalence of birth defects. The study reveals that significant differences existed between the total prevalence, perinatal prevalence, and livebirth prevalence of birth defects (including many specific defects), and year, sex, residence, and maternal age had significant impacts on it. The outcomes of the study will help to take preventive measures for birth defects as well as benefit the people involving public health and policymakers to improve the current scenario.

The impact of coronavirus disease 2019 on frozen-thawed embryo transfer outcomes.

Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has raised concerns about its potential effects on human fertility, particularly among individuals undergoing assisted reproductive therapy (ART). However, the impact of COVID-19 on female reproductive and assisted reproductive outcomes is unclear. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of COVID-19 on pregnancy outcomes during frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 327 enrolled patients who underwent FET cycles at a single reproductive centre. The study group consisted of patients treated between 1 January 2023 and 31 March 2023 who recently recovered from COVID-19. The embryos for transfer were generated prior to COVID-19 infection. The control group consisted of patients treated between 1 January 2021 and 31 March 2021 who were not infected and did not receive a severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccine. Demographic and cycle characteristics and outcomes were compared. Results: A total of 160 recovered women and 167 controls were included. The primary outcome-the live birth rate-was similar between the two groups (43.8% vs. 43.1%, P > 0.05). The secondary outcomes, such as the implantation rates (41.2% vs. 39.3%), biochemical pregnancy rates (56.3% vs. 56.3%), clinical pregnancy rates (52.5% vs. 52.1%), early abortion rates (8.3% vs. 12.6%) and ongoing pregnancy rates (46.9% vs. 44.3%), were also similar (P < 0.05). According to a logistic regression model, the live birth rate did not decrease after SARS-CoV-2 infection after adjusting for confounding factors (adjusted OR (95% CI) = 0.953 (0.597∼1.523)). Regardless of stratification by age or the number of embryos transferred, the differences remained nonsignificant. Subgroup logistic regression demonstrated that the time interval from infection to transplant had no significant influence on the live birth rate. Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 infection after oocyte retrieval had no detrimental effect on subsequent FET outcomes.

Cumulative live birth rate of a blastocyst versus cleavage stage embryo transfer policy during in vitro fertilisation in women with a good prognosis: multicentre randomised controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether embryo transfers at blastocyst stage improve the cumulative live birth rate after oocyte retrieval, including both fresh and frozen-thawed transfers, and whether the risk of obstetric and perinatal complications is increased compared with cleavage stage embryo transfers during in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment. DESIGN: Multicentre randomised controlled trial. SETTING: 21 hospitals and clinics in the Netherlands, 18 August 2018 to 17 December 2021. PARTICIPANTS: 1202 women with at least four embryos available on day 2 after oocyte retrieval were randomly assigned to either blastocyst stage embryo transfer (n=603) or cleavage stage embryo transfer (n=599). INTERVENTIONS: In the blastocyst group and cleavage group, embryo transfers were performed on day 5 and day 3, respectively, after oocyte retrieval, followed by cryopreservation of surplus embryos. Analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis, with secondary analyses as per protocol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the cumulative live birth rate per oocyte retrieval, including results of all frozen-thawed embryo transfers within a year after randomisation. Secondary outcomes included cumulative rates of pregnancy, pregnancy loss, and live birth after fresh embryo transfer, number of embryo transfers needed, number of frozen embryos, and obstetric and perinatal outcomes. RESULTS: The cumulative live birth rate did not differ between the blastocyst group and cleavage group (58.9% (355 of 603) v 58.4% (350 of 599; risk ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.84 to 1.22). The blastocyst group showed a higher live birth rate after fresh embryo transfer (1.26, 1.00 to 1.58), lower cumulative pregnancy loss rate (0.68, 0.51 to 0.89), and lower mean number of embryo transfers needed to result in a live birth (1.55 v 1.82; P<0.001). The incidence of moderate preterm birth (32 to <37 weeks) in singletons was higher in the blastocyst group (1.87, 1.05 to 3.34). CONCLUSION: Blastocyst stage embryo transfers resulted in a similar cumulative live birth rate to cleavage stage embryo transfers in women with at least four embryos available during IVF treatment. TRIAL REGISTRATION: International Clinical Trial Registry Platform NTR7034.

Live birth and maternity outcome in childhood and adolescent cancer survivors under 18 years at diagnosis: a 40-year population-based cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Survival from childhood and adolescent cancer has increased, but the chance of a livebirth in female survivors under 18 years at diagnosis may be reduced. METHODS: We performed a national population-based analysis, including all female cancer survivors diagnosed in Scotland before the age of 18 years between 1981 and 2012. Scottish Cancer Registry records were linked to Scottish maternity records. Females from the exposed group with no pregnancies before cancer diagnosis (n = 2118) were compared with three general population controls matched for age and year of diagnosis. FINDINGS: The cumulative incidence of a livebirth for all diagnoses was reduced to 37% (95% CI 33-40%) for cancer survivors at 30 years of age vs 58% (57-60%) for controls. The deficit varying by diagnosis: for lymphoid leukaemia, the cumulative incidence at 30 years was 29% (23-36%) vs 57% (52-61%) for controls with similar deficits in CNS tumours and retinoblastoma. There was a steady improvement in the chance of livebirth in those diagnosed more recently. INTERPRETATION: We have shown a reduced chance of livebirth in female survivors of cancer diagnosed before age 18. The deficit is present for all diagnoses.

Live birth rate after oocyte donation in females diagnosed with turner syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: An enduring challenge for women diagnosed with Turner syndrome (TS) is infertility. Oocyte donation (OD) offers a chance of pregnancy for these patients. However, current data on pregnancy outcomes are inadequate. Hence, this systematic review aims to explore the clinical outcomes of OD in patients with TS. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Sciences, Scopus, and Embase for relevant papers from 1 January 1990 to 30 November 2023. Our primary research objective is to determine the live birth rate among women with TS who have undergone in vitro fertilization (IVF) using OD for fertility purposes. Specifically, we aim to calculate the pooled live birth rates per patient and per embryo transfer (ET) cycle. For secondary outcomes, we have analyzed the rates of clinical pregnancy achievement per ET cycle and the incidence of gestational hypertensive complications per clinical pregnancy. Prevalence meta-analyses were performed using STATA 18.0 by utilizing a random-effects model and calculating the pooled rates of each outcome using a 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: A total of 14 studies encompassing 417 patients were systematically reviewed. Except for one prospective clinical trial and one prospective cohort study, all other 12 studies had a retrospective cohort design. Our meta-analysis has yielded a pooled live birth rate per patient of 40% (95% CI: 29-51%; 14 studies included) and a pooled live birth rate per ET cycle of 17% (95% CI: 13-20%; 13 studies included). Also, the pooled clinical pregnancy achievement rate per ET cycle was estimated at 31% (95% CI: 25-36%; 12 studies included). Moreover, the pooled rate of pregnancy-induced hypertensive disorders per clinical pregnancy was estimated at 12% (95% CI: 1-31%; 8 studies included). No publication bias was found across all analyses. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated promising pregnancy outcomes for OD in patients with TS. Further studies are essential to address not only the preferred techniques, but also the psychological, ethical, and societal implications of these complex procedures for these vulnerable populations. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under the registration code CRD42023494273.

Assisted reproductive technology outcomes in women with congenital uterine anomalies: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: The present systematic review aimed to assess the fecundity of women with congenital uterine anomalies (CUAs) undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART). METHODS: The present systematic review of the literature was reported according to the PRISMA guidelines. We systematically searched PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and Scopus, from database inception to 17th October 2023. Studies were deemed eligible only if they included women with CUAs clearly fitting into one of the categories of the ASRM Müllerian anomalies classification 2021. RESULTS: Data relevant to the reproductive outcomes of women with CUAs who underwent ART were extracted from 55 studies. Regarding Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome, studies on gestational surrogacy reported a live birth rate (LBR) ranging from 37 to 54%. Uterus transplant, although still experimental, showed promising results. Most studies reported a negative impact of unicornuate uterus and partial or complete septate uterus on both the miscarriage rate (MR) and the live birth rate (LBR). The reproductive prognosis of women with unicornuate uterus was shown to be particularly poor in case of twin pregnancy. Uterus didelphys, bicornuate and arcuate uterus seem not to negatively impact the ART reproductive outcomes. Uterus didelphys was associated with an increased risk of preterm birth (PTB), cesarean section and low birth weight (LBW). CONCLUSION: Women with CUAs should be informed regarding the impact (if any) of their congenital anomaly on both the chances of success of ART and on pregnancy-related complications. Elective single embryo transfer (eSET) should always be the first choice in patients with an increased baseline obstetric risk.

Required number of blastocysts transferred, and oocytes retrieved to optimize live and cumulative live birth rates in the first complete cycle of IVF for autologous and donated oocytes.

PURPOSE: To investigate live birth rate (LBR) and cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) to achieve the first newborn per blastocyst transferred and oocyte retrieved in the first complete IVF cycle of autologous and donated oocytes and identify the possible success factors. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of a private IVF center. There were 1867 cycles, 1241 of which were fresh transfers and 626, their subsequent thawing transfers. RESULTS: We found significant variables by binary logistic regression. For LBR, female infertility and the day of blastocyst transferred were relevant; however, for CLBR, the numbers of blastocysts available for future transfers, oocyte age, and maternal age were more critical. Oocyte age is a negative factor that begins to affect CLBR gradually beyond 36 years; from that age, there are significant worse results in polycystic ovary syndrome and poor responder patients. CONCLUSION: The LBR and CLBR were optimized for oocyte recipients when eight oocytes were retrieved (63.6%; 87.9%); at most, fourteen oocytes should be assigned to avoid freezing surplus blastocysts. Thirteen autologous oocytes (69.2%; 92.3%) were ideal for optimization. CLBR optimized after three blastocysts in donor oocytes (81.8%) and four for autologous oocyte patients (80.9%). Our outcomes are valuable for doctors and infertile couples, and they give us information on what we can expect from a first complete IVF cycle.

GnRH agonist-only trigger, compared to dual trigger, reduces oocyte retrieval rate in high responders without affecting cumulative live birth rate.

Introduction: This study compared, in high responders undergoing IVF treatment, GnRH agonist-only trigger and dual trigger on oocyte retrieval rate and cumulative live birth rate (LBR). The aim was to determine if the GnRH agonist-only triggers had provided outcomes comparable to dual trigger, while minimizing the risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Materials and methods: A retrospective, matched case-control study was conducted at Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan, including women who underwent IVF/ICSI between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2022. Inclusion criteria were: GnRH antagonist protocol and estrogen level >3,000 pg/ml on trigger day. Exclusion criteria were: immune/metabolic diseases, donated oocytes, and mixed stimulation cycles. Propensity score matching was applied to balance age, AMH level, and oocyte number between the GnRH agonist-only and dual trigger groups. Outcomes were analyzed for patients who had complete treatment cycles, focusing on oocyte retrieval rate and cumulative LBR. Results: We analyzed 116 cycles in the agonist-only group, and 232 cycles in the dual trigger group. No inter-group difference was found in their age, BMI, and AMH levels. The dual trigger group had a higher oocyte retrieval rate (93% vs. 80%; p <0.05), while fertilization rates, blastocyst formation rates, and cumulative LBR were comparable. Notably, no OHSS cases had been reported in the GnRH agonist-only group, compared with 7 cases in the dual trigger group. Conclusion: GnRH agonist-only triggers resulted in a lower oocyte retrieval rate compared to dual triggers but did not significantly affect cumulative LBR in high responders. This approach effectively reduces OHSS risk without compromising pregnancy outcomes, making it a preferable option in freeze-all strategies, despite a longer oocyte pick-up duration and a medium cost. GnRH agonist-only trigger, however, may not be suitable for fresh embryo transfers or patients with low serum LH levels on trigger day.

Detecting and Dating Early Non-live Pregnancy Outcomes: Generation of a Novel Pregnancy Algorithm From Norwegian Linked Health Registries.

PURPOSE: Pregnancies ending before gestational week 12 are common but not notified to the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. Our goal was to develop an algorithm that more completely detects and dates all possible pregnancy outcomes (i.e., miscarriages, elective terminations, ectopic pregnancies, molar pregnancies, stillbirths, and live births) by using diagnostic codes from primary and secondary care registries to complement information from the birth registry. METHODS: We used nationwide linked registry data between 2008 and 2018 in a hierarchical manner: We developed the UiO pregnancy algorithm to arrive at unique pregnancy outcomes, considering codes within 56 days as the same event. To estimate the gestational age of pregnancy outcomes identified in the primary and secondary care registries, we inferred the median gestational age of pregnancy markers (45 ICD-10 codes and 9 ICPC-2 codes) from pregnancies registered in the medical birth registry. When no pregnancy markers were available, we assigned outcome-specific gestational age estimates. The performance of the algorithm was assessed by blinded clinicians. RESULTS: Using only the medical birth registry, we identified 649 703 pregnancies, including 1369 (0.2%) miscarriages and 3058 (0.5%) elective terminations. With the new algorithm, we detected 859 449 pregnancies, including 642 712 live-births (74.8%), 112 257 miscarriages (13.1%), 94 664 elective terminations (11.0%), 6429 ectopic pregnancies (0.7%), 2564 stillbirths (0.3%), and 823 molar pregnancies (0.1%). The median gestational age was 10+1 weeks (IQR 10+0-12+2) for miscarriages and 8+0 weeks (IQR 8+0-9+6) for elective terminations. Gestational age could be inferred using pregnancy markers for 66.3% of miscarriages and 47.2% of elective terminations. CONCLUSION: The UiO pregnancy algorithm improved the detection and dating of early non-live pregnancy outcomes that would have gone unnoticed if relying solely on the medical birth registry information.

Effect of single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryo transfer on cumulative live births in women with good prognosis undergoing in vitro fertilization: Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

In this multicenter, non-inferiority, randomized trial, we randomly assigned 992 women undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF) with a good prognosis (aged 20-40, ≥3 transferrable cleavage-stage embryos) to strategies of blastocyst-stage (n = 497) or cleavage-stage (n = 495) single embryo transfer. Primary outcome was cumulative live-birth rate after up to three transfers. Secondary outcomes were cumulative live-births after all embryo transfers within 1 year of randomization, pregnancy outcomes, obstetric-perinatal complications, and livebirths outcomes. Live-birth rates were 74.8% in blastocyst-stage group versus 66.3% in cleavage-stage group (relative risk 1.13, 95%CI:1.04-1.22; Pnon-inferiority < 0.001, Psuperiority = 0.003) (1-year cumulative live birth rates of 75.7% versus 68.9%). Blastocyst transfer increased the risk of spontaneous preterm birth (4.6% vs 2.0%; P = 0.02) and neonatal hospitalization >3 days. Among good prognosis women, a strategy of single blastocyst transfer increases cumulative live-birth rates over single cleavage-stage transfer. Blastocyst transfer resulted in higher preterm birth rates. This information should be used to counsel patients on their choice between cleavage-stage and blastocyst-stage transfer (NCT03152643, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03152643 ).