Epidemiological investigation and diagnostic analysis of osteonecrosis of the femoral head in three northeastern provinces of China.

BACKGROUND: In this retrospective case investigation, we analysed the data of patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) to reveal demographic and clinical diagnostic features of ONFH in three northeastern provinces of China and provide a reference for its prevention, diagnosis, and treatment. METHODS: We collected data from patients in Beijing Orthopaedic Hospital of Liaoning, focusing on the aetiology and diagnosis of ONFH. Medical records and self-designed questionnaires were used to collect information for statistical analysis, including age, aetiology, reason for glucocorticoid use, hospital level at first visit, and diagnosis. RESULTS: In total, 906 patients with complete medical records were included in the analysis. The mean patient age was 47.65 ± 12.12 years. The peak age distribution was in the 40s for men and the 50s for women. Among the total cohort, 72 patients (7.95%; 40 men and 32 women) had traumatic ONFH, 198 (21.85%; 131 men and 67 women) had steroid-induced ONFH, 230 (25.39%; 121 men and 109 women) had idiopathic ONFH, and 406 (44.81%; 397 men and 9 women) had alcohol-induced ONFH. Six hundred and twenty patients were diagnosed with ONFH at the first visit, while 286 patients were misdiagnosed, with a diagnosis rate of 68.43%. The diagnosis rate at the first visit in tertiary hospitals was 76.14%. The diagnosis rate at the first visit in second-class hospitals was 52.07%.ONFH was most likely to be misdiagnosed as lumbar disc herniation. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with ONFH in three northeastern provinces of China were middle-aged, male, and had alcohol-induced ONFH. The misdiagnosis rate of ONFH at the first visit was very high, especially for misdiagnosis of lumbar disc herniation, indicating that the diagnosis of ONFH requires further improvement.

[Correlation analysis between combined deflection angle and osteonecrosis of femoral head after femoral neck fracture].

Objective: To evaluate the correlation between pelvic incidence (PI) angle, hip deflection angle (HDA), combined deflection angle (CDA) and osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) after femoral neck fracture, in order to explore early predictive indicators for ONFH occurrence after femoral neck fracture. Methods: A study was conducted on patients with femoral neck fractures who underwent cannulated screw internal fixation between December 2018 and December 2020. Among them, 208 patients met the selection criteria and were included in the study. According to the occurrence of ONFH, the patients were allocated into ONFH group and non-NOFH group. PI, HDA, and CDA were measured based on the anteroposterior X-ray films of pelvis and axial X-ray films of the affected hip joint before operation, and the differences between the two groups were compared. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to evaluate the value of the above imaging indicators in predicting the occurrence of ONFH. Results: Among the 208 patients included in the study, 84 patients experienced ONFH during follow-up (ONFH group) and 124 patients did not experience ONFH (non-ONFH group). In the non-ONFH group, there were 59 males and 65 females, the age was 18-86 years (mean, 53.9 years), and the follow-up time was 18-50 months (mean, 33.2 months). In the ONFH group, there were 37 males and 47 females, the age was 18-76 years (mean, 51.6 years), and the follow-up time was 8-45 months (mean, 22.1 months). The PI, HDA, and CDA were significantly larger in the ONFH group than in the non-ONFH group ( P<0.05). ROC curve analysis showed that the critical value of PI was 19.82° (sensitivity of 40.5%, specificity of 86.3%, P<0.05); the critical value of HDA was 20.94° (sensitivity of 77.4%, specificity of 75.8%, P<0.05); and the critical value of CDA was 39.16° (sensitivity of 89.3%, specificity of 83.1%, P<0.05). Conclusion: There is a correlation between PI, HDA, CDA and the occurrence of ONFH after femoral neck fracture, in which CDA can be used as an important reference indicator. Patients with CDA≥39.16° have a higher risk of ONFH after femoral neck fracture.

Intraoperative Epiphyseal Perfusion Monitoring Does Not Reliably Predict Osteonecrosis Following Treatment of Unstable SCFE.

BACKGROUND: Avascular necrosis (AVN) remains the most dreaded complication of unstable slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) treatment. Newer closed reduction techniques (with perfusion monitoring) have emerged as a technically straightforward means to address residual SCFE deformity while still minimizing the risk of osteonecrosis. However, limited data exists regarding the reliability of intraoperative epiphyseal perfusion monitoring to predict the development of AVN. The purpose of this study was to evaluate its reliability. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed all patients with unstable SCFE who underwent closed or open reduction with epiphyseal perfusion monitoring using an intracranial pressure (ICP) probe from 2015 to 2023 at a single institution with a minimum 6-month radiographic follow-up. Demographic, clinical, and radiographic data were recorded, including duration of symptoms, type of reduction, capsulotomy performed, presence of a waveform on ICP monitoring after epiphyseal fixation, and development of AVN on follow-up radiographs. RESULTS: Our cohort included 33 hips (32 patients), of which 60.6% (n=20) were male. The average age was 12.5±1.8 years, with a median follow-up of 15.8 months. Eleven hips were treated with open reduction using the modified Dunn technique (10 hips) or anterior approach (1 hip), and 22 hips were treated with inadvertent (5 hips) or purposeful closed reduction using the Leadbetter technique (17 hips). Overall, 8 of the 33 hips in our series (24.2%) developed AVN, 6 of which (20%) had a pulsatile waveform on intraoperative epiphyseal perfusion monitoring. The overall rate of AVN after closed reductions was 31.8% (7 of 22 hips); the incidence of AVN after closed reduction with a detectable waveform was 30% (6 of 20 hips). There was no significant association between time to surgery ( P =0.416) or type of reduction ( P =0.218) and the incidence of AVN. CONCLUSIONS: In this series, intraoperative epiphyseal perfusion monitoring did not reliably predict the development of osteonecrosis. To our knowledge, this is the first study to report AVN after demonstrable intraoperative epiphyseal perfusion following closed reduction of unstable slips. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV: case series-therapeutic study.

Osteonecrosis risk after steroids-related treatment of COVID-19 is not negligible: A cross sectional study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: During the pandemic, steroids use at various dosages and durations for the treatment of COVID-19 patients, especially in hospitalized patients, was a common and effective strategy. However, steroid administration is associated with osteonecrosis as an adverse event. The aim of the study was to examine the prevalence of skeleton osteonecrosis in COVID-19 patients treated with or without steroids. METHODS: Eighty randomly selected hospitalized COVID-19 patients were analyzed, of which 40 were managed with a published protocol including steroids and 40 did not receive steroids. Demographics and laboratory measurements including white blood cells count, C-reactive protein and ferritin were retrieved from the medical records. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging of the hips, shoulders, and knees. Subsequently, all patients were clinically examined and Oxford hip score (OHS) and EuroQol- 5 Dimension (EQ-5D-5 L) were documented. RESULTS: Three patients (3/40; 7.5 %) treated with steroids were diagnosed with femoral head osteonecrosis. None of the patients in the non-steroid-treated group developed osteonecrosis. There were no differences between the two groups regarding OHS and EQ-5D-5 L. Patients with osteonecrosis had higher ferritin levels, received higher doses of corticosteroids (median dose 2200 mg), and had longer hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19-related therapy with steroids resulted in lower prevalence of osteonecrosis than that previously recorded in patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome caused by coronavirus-type-1. However, this risk seems not negligible and therefore, high clinical suspicion for early diagnosis is warranted, given the fact that a great proportion of hospitalized patients received steroids during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Risk factor analysis of femoral avascular necrosis after operation for Tönnis grade IV developmental dysplasia of the hip.

PURPOSE: We explored the risk factors for avascular necrosis (AVN) after surgery using open reduction, pelvic osteotomy, and femoral osteotomy for Tönnis grade IV developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). METHODS: In this retrospective study, we collected data of patients with Tönnis grade IV DDH treated with open reduction and pelvic osteotomy combined with femoral osteotomy from January 2012 to May 2020. The patients were divided into the AVN group and non-AVN group using the Kalamchi-MacEwen classification system. The clinical and imaging data of the two groups were collected, and the possible risk factors were included in the analysis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify the independent risk factors and odds ratios of AVN. RESULTS: In all, 254 patients (mean age; 2.6±0.9 years, 278 hips) were included. The mean follow-up time was 3.8±1.5 years. A total of 89 hips (32%) were finally classified as AVN (Kalamchi-MacEwen II-IV). Univariate analysis showed significant associations with AVN for age (p=0.006), preoperative femoral neck anteversion (FAV) (p<0.001), femoral osteotomy length to dislocation height ratio (FDR) <1 (p<0.001), and the epiphyseal ossific nucleus diameter to the neck diameter ratio (ENR) <50% (p=0.009). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that only excessive preoperative FAV (OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.02-1.05; p<0.001) and FDR<1 (OR: 3.58; 95% CI: 2.03-6.31; p<0.001) were independent risk factors for femoral head necrosis. CONCLUSION: Excessive preoperative FAV and FDR<1 are important risk factors for femoral AVN after open reduction, pelvic osteotomy, and femoral osteotomy for Tönnis grade IV DDH. For children with DDH with high dislocation and excessive FAV, clinicians should fully evaluate their condition and design more personalized treatment programs to prevent AVN.

Is COVID-19 an independent risk factor for the development of avascular necrosis of the hip? A retrospective study to evaluate the factors associated with avascular necrosis of the hip in patients who had COVID-19 infection.

PURPOSE: The cumulative effect of hyper-coagulative COVID-19 disease and using steroids leads to increased avascular necrosis (AVN) hip incidence. This study aims to correlate the various factors of COVID-19 infection with the occurrence of AVN hip. METHODS: It is a retrospective cross-sectional study of non-traumatic AVN hip patients with a history of COVID-19 infection. A total number of 50 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. The following details were obtained: (a) patient's demographics, (b) COVID-19: interval of infection and groin pain, duration of symptoms, severity, steroid intake, (c) AVN hip: involved side, Ficat-Arlet staging. RESULTS: The mean age was 36.3 years (range: 20-60), and body mass index (BMI) was 25.13 kg/m2 (range: 18.50-31.50). There were 45 males and five females. Sixty percent (30) of patients managed at home, 24% (12) required admission into the ward, 2% (1) were in ICU only, and 14% (7) admitted to both ICU and ward. The mean interval of COVID-19 infection and onset of hip pain was 359.02 days (range: 10-822 days). Thirty-eight percent (19) patients required steroids (injection and oral), 46% (23) took steroids (oral only), whereas 16% (8) recovered without steroids. The stage of AVN correlated with the severity of COVID-19 infection (p-value -0.038) and significant improvement in VAS and HHS after treatment in each stage. The mean follow-up was 9.79 months (6-19 months). CONCLUSION: A low-dose steroid intake with moderate to severe COVID-19 infection produces an additive effect on the development of AVN hip. Most affected individuals were adult males, and stage II AVN was the most common, managed with bisphosphonates and core decompression for short intervals.

The Duration of Hardware Retention After Radiologic Union of Surgically Treated Femoral Neck Fractures in Children May Predict the Aggravation or Occurrence of Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head or Neck After Hardware Removal.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of aggravation or occurrence of avascular necrosis (AVN) following hardware removal in surgically treated pediatric femoral neck fractures who achieved radiologic consolidation is unknown. This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for this complication. METHODS: Seventy-one pediatric (mean age: 9.8±3.9 y) were retrospectively analyzed. Risk factors (age, sex, laterality, severity of initial displacement, type of fracture, time from trauma to reduction, reduction and fixation method, quality of reduction, time required to achieve radiologic union, duration of hardware retention, presence of AVN before hardware removal and follow-up time) were recorded. The severity of AVN was assessed based on radiographs with Ratliff's classification. RESULTS: Following hardware removal, the aggravation/occurrence of AVN was detected in 11 hips (15.5%). Among the 5 hips (7%) with aggravation of AVN, 1 (1.4%) with type II AVN and 3 (4.2%) with type III AVN exhibited aggravation of type I AVN, while the remaining hip (1.4%; type I) showed enlargement of the involved AVN area. Six hips (8.5%) developed AVN following hardware removal: 2 (2.8%) were classified as type I and 4 (5.6%) as type III. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that hardware retention >7 months after union is associated with a decreased rate of aggravation or occurrence of AVN of the femoral neck or head following hardware removal. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of aggravation or occurrence of AVN following hardware removal in surgically treated pediatric femoral neck fractures is 15.5%; hardware retention >7 months after radiologic union may reduce the risk of aggravation or occurrence of AVN of the femoral neck or head postimplant removal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Association of hardware removal with secondary osteonecrosis following femoral neck fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: It has been controversial that whether hardware removal will increase the risk of osteonecrosis of femoral head (ONFH) in fracture-healed patients who underwent internal fixation for femoral neck fractures (FNFs). This meta-analysis aimed to clarify the association of hardware removal with secondary hardware removal-induced ONFH (HR-ONFH). METHODS: Four electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library) were searched for eligible studies published up to March 10, 2023. Studies reporting the relative risk of hardware status (i.e., risk rate, odds ratio [OR], or hazard ratio [HR]) were included. Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS) was used to assess risk of bias of included observational studies. Review Manager software was used to pool ORs and adjusted ORs. RESULTS: Five studies were included into quantitative synthesis. Hardware removal was associated with a reduced risk of HR-ONFH in the synthesis of crude odds ratios (OR, 0.62, 95% CI 0.39-0.96). In the synthesis of adjusted odds ratios, hardware removal was associated with an increased risk of HR-ONFH (OR, 1.76, 95% CI 1.23-2.51). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that hardware removal was associated with an increased incidence of HR-ONFH in fracture-healed patients who underwent internal fixation due to FNFs.

Spontaneous femoral neck fracture resulting from osteonecrosis involving lateral femoral head-neck junction: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Spontaneous femoral neck fracture is a rare condition that remains controversial due to limited reported cases. This retrospective study aims to provide further insights into the etiology and characteristics of the disease. METHOD: We conducted a retrospective review of data from 963 patients with femoral neck fractures. The data encompassed demographic information, medical histories, radiographic records, bone mineral density (BMD) measurements, and pathological examinations. Patients were categorized into two groups: spontaneous femoral neck fracture (SFF) group (30 cases) and control group (933 cases), based on their medical histories. Logistic regression analysis was employed to identify risk factors for SFF. Statistical analysis was performed to compare and elucidate the characteristics of SFF within each group. RESULTS: Logistic regression analysis revealed osteonecrosis of the femoral head, steroid use, and osteoporosis as three significant risk factors for SFF. Furthermore, a higher proportion of Garden type I and II fractures, as well as Pauwels type I fractures, were observed in the SFF group compared to the control group. Within the SFF group, a higher proportion of patients with osteonecrosis exhibited Garden type III and IV fractures compared to those with osteoporosis. Additionally, both magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pathological examinations demonstrated that osteonecrosis in the SFF group predominantly occurred at the lateral femoral head-neck junction. CONCLUSIONS: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head, particularly involving the lateral head-neck junction, was confirmed as a major risk factor for SFF. Furthermore, SFF exhibits internal heterogeneity based on its different causes.

Laboratory indices in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a retrospective comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head is a degenerative condition linked to corticosteroids, alcoholism, or trauma. With its rising prevalence due to increased hormone drug use and its debilitating effects on young to middle-aged individuals, understanding its association with specific laboratory indicators can aid early diagnosis and prevention. METHODS: Upon retrospective analysis of the clinical data pertaining to individuals diagnosed with femoral head necrosis, spanning from January 2016 to January 2022, a comprehensive evaluation was conducted within the same time frame. The study aimed to ascertain the presence of femoral head necrosis in a total of 1176 individuals. A total of 1036 healthy patients were recruited randomly, ensuring that their ages matched. The risk variables associated with the utilization of logistic regression analysis and analysis techniques are employed. The patient examines the age distribution within a specific age group. RESULTS: The levels of high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein A1, lipoprotein B1, total protein, albumin, globulin, and other lipophilic metabolism and coagulation markers exhibited a statistically significant increase compared to the control group. A multifactor logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify potential risk factors associated with femoral head necrosis in patients. CONCLUSION: Femoral head necrosis is associated with a range of variables including coagulation malfunction, lipid metabolic abnormalities, and inflammation.

Epidemiological Characteristics and Trends of Primary Hip Arthroplasty in Five Tertiary Hospitals: A Multicenter Retrospective Study.

OBJECTIVE: The number of primary hip arthroplasty (PHA) has increased sharply in recent years. Whether the epidemiological characteristics and trends of PHA have changed are unknown. This study aims to analyze the epidemiological characteristics and trends of those patients are urgent for public health institutions. METHODS: The data of patients who underwent PHA in five tertiary hospitals from January 2011 to December 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 21,898 patients were included, most of whom were aged 60-69 years (25.1% males and 31.5% females). According to the hospitalization date, the patients were divided into two groups (Group A and Group B). The patients admitted between January 2011 and December 2015 were designated as Group A (7862), and those admitted between January 2016 and December 2020 were designated as Group B (14036). The patient data of the two groups, including sex, age, disease causes, body mass index (BMI), comorbidities, surgical procedures, hospital stay duration, and hospitalization costs, were analyzed by Pearson chi-Square test, Student t test or Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: More women were included in Group B than in Group A (58.5% vs 52.5%, P < 0.001). The mean age of Group B was less than that of Group A (62.27 ± 14.77 vs 60.69 ± 14.44 years, P < 0.001). Femoral head necrosis was the primary pathogenic factor in both groups, with a higher proportion in Group B than in Group A (55.5% vs 45.5%, P < 0.001). Significant differences were found between the two groups in BMI, comorbidities, surgical procedures, hospital stay duration, and hospitalization costs. Total hip arthroplasty (THA) was the most common surgical procedure in both groups, with a higher proportion in Group B than in Group A (89.8% vs 79.3%, P < 0.001). The proportion of patients with one or more comorbidities was significantly higher in Group B than in Group A (69.2% vs 59.9%, P < 0.001). In addition, Group B had a shorter hospital stay duration and higher hospitalization costs than Group A. CONCLUSION: Femoral head necrosis was the primary etiology for PHA in this study, followed by femoral neck fracture and hip osteoarthritis. Patients who underwent PHA exhibited a higher percentage of femoral head necrosis; underwent THA more often; and had larger BMIs, more comorbidities, higher medical costs, and younger age in the past decade.

Did the COVID-19 Pandemic Coincide With an Increase in Osteonecrosis as Indication for Total Hip Arthroplasty in Older Patients?

BACKGROUND: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head is a common indication for total hip arthroplasty (THA). It is unclear to what extent the COVID-19 pandemic has impacted its incidence. Theoretically, the combination of microvascular thromboses and corticosteroid use in patients who have COVID-19 may increase the risk of osteonecrosis. We aimed to (1) assess recent osteonecrosis trends and (2) investigate if a history of COVID-19 diagnosis is associated with osteonecrosis. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study utilized a large national database between 2016 and 2021. Osteonecrosis incidence in 2016 to 2019 was compared to 2020 to 2021. Secondly, utilizing a cohort from April 2020 through December 2021, we investigated whether a prior COVID-19 diagnosis was associated with osteonecrosis. For both comparisons, Chi-square tests were applied. RESULTS: Among 1,127,796 THAs performed between 2016 and 2021, we found an osteonecrosis incidence of 1.6% (n = 5,812) in 2020 to 2021 compared to 1.4% (n = 10,974) in 2016 to 2019; P < .0001. Furthermore, using April 2020 to December 2021 data from 248,183 THAs, we found that osteonecrosis was more common among those who had a history of COVID-19 (3.9%; 130 of 3,313) compared to patients who had no COVID-19 history (3.0%; 7,266 of 244,870); P = .001). CONCLUSION: Osteonecrosis incidence was higher in 2020 to 2021 compared to previous years and a previous COVID-19 diagnosis was associated with a greater likelihood of osteonecrosis. These findings suggest a role of the COVID-19 pandemic on an increased osteonecrosis incidence. Continued monitoring is necessary to fully understand the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on THA care and outcomes.

[Analysis of incidence and clinical characteristics of osteonecrosis of femoral head in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus treated with glucocorticoid: A descriptive study based on a prospective cohort].

Objective: To describe the disease characteristics of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) who experiencing prolonged glucocorticoid (GC) exposure. Methods: Between January 2016 and June 2019, 449 SLE patients meeting the criteria were recruited from multiple centers. Hip MRI examinations were performed during screening and regular follow-up to determine the occurrence of ONFH. The cohort was divided into ONFH and non-ONFH groups, and the differences in demographic baseline characteristics, general clinical characteristics, GC medication information, combined medication, and hip clinical features were compared and comprehensively described. Results: The age at SLE diagnosis was 29.8 (23.2, 40.9) years, with 93.1% (418 cases) being female. The duration of GC exposure was 5.3 (2.0, 10.5) years, and the cumulative incidence of SLE-ONFH was 9.1%. Significant differences ( P<0.05) between ONFH and non-ONFH groups were observed in the following clinical characteristics: ① Demographic baseline characteristics: ONFH group had a higher proportion of patients with body mass index (BMI)<20 kg/m 2 compared to non-ONFH group. ② General clinical characteristics: ONFH group showed a higher proportion of patients with cutaneous and renal manifestations, positive antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) and anticardiolipin antibodies, severe SLE patients [baseline SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score ≥15], and secondary hypertension. Fasting blood glucose in ONFH group was also higher. ③ GC medication information: ONFH group had higher initial intravenous GC exposure rates, duration, cumulative doses, higher cumulative GC doses in the first month and the first 3 months, higher average daily doses in the first 3 months, and higher proportions of average daily doses ≥15.0 mg/d and ≥30.0 mg/d, as well as higher full-course average daily doses and proportion of full-course daily doses ≥30.0 mg/d compared to non-ONFH group. ④ Combined medications: ONFH group had a significantly higher rate of antiplatelet drug use than non-ONFH group. ⑤ Hip clinical features: ONFH group had a higher proportion of hip discomfort or pain and a higher incidence of hip joint effusion before MRI screening than non-ONFH group. Conclusion: The incidence of ONFH after GC exposure in China's SLE population remains high (9.1%), with short-term (first 3 months), medium-to-high dose (average daily dose ≥15 mg/d) GC being closely associated with ONFH. Severe SLE, low BMI, certain clinical phenotypes, positive aPLs, and secondary hypertension may also be related to ONFH.

Trends in Surgical Management of Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A 2010 to 2020 Nationwide Study.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is estimated at more than 20,000 patients annually in the US. Our study aimed to provide a 10-year analysis: 1) evaluating total operative procedures with rates normalized to the population; 2) determining trends of arthroplasty versus joint-preserving procedures; and 3) quantifying specific operative techniques in patients <50 versus >50 years of age. METHODS: A total of 64,739 patients who were diagnosed with ONFH and underwent hip surgery were identified from a nationwide database between 2010 and 2020. The percentage of patients managed by each operative procedure was calculated and normalized to the overall population annually. Patients were grouped into joint-preserving versus non-joint-preserving (arthroplasty) procedures, and divided by age under/over 50 years. Linear regression modeling was performed to evaluate trends/differences in procedural volume by year. RESULTS: The number of operative procedures to treat ONFH has relatively declined from 2010 to 2020. The relative proportion of joint-preserving procedures increased (8.6% to 11.2%) during this time period. There were significantly more joint-preserving procedures in patients aged <50 years relative to >50 years (15.3% versus 2.7%, P < .001). Overall, THA was the most common procedure (57,033;88.1%) relative to hemiarthroplasty (3,875;6.0%), core decompression (2,730;4.2%), bone graft (467;0.7%), and osteotomy (257;0.4%). CONCLUSION: Surgical management of patients who have ONFH remains predominantly arthroplasty procedures (94% overall). Our findings suggest an increase in joint-preserving procedures, particularly core decompression, in patients <50 years (15.3%). Our findings provide insight into surgical management trends for ONFH, and suggest opportunities for joint-preserving procedures.

MsgeCNN: Multiscale geometric embedded convolutional neural network for ONFH segmentation and grading.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is increasing gradually, rapid and accurate grading of ONFH is critical. The existing Steinberg staging criteria grades ONFH according to the proportion of necrosis area to femoral head area. PURPOSE: In the clinical practice, the necrosis region and femoral head region are mainly estimated by the observation and experience of doctor. This paper proposes a two-stage segmentation and grading framework, which can be used to segment the femoral head and necrosis, as well as to diagnosis. METHODS: The core of the proposed two-stage framework is the multiscale geometric embedded convolutional neural network (MsgeCNN), which integrates geometric information into the training process and accurately segments the femoral head region. Then, the necrosis regions are segmented by the adaptive threshold method taking femoral head as the background. The area and proportion of the two are calculated to determine the grade. RESULTS: The accuracy of the proposed MsgeCNN for femoral head segmentation is 97.73%, sensitivity is 91.17%, specificity is 99.40%, dice score is 93.34%. And the segmentation performance is better than the existing five segmentation algorithms. The diagnostic accuracy of the overall framework is 90.80%. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed framework can accurately segment the femoral head region and the necrosis region. The area, proportion, and other pathological information of the framework output provide auxiliary strategies for subsequent clinical treatment.

The incidence and risk factors for femoral head necrosis after femoral neck fracture in pediatric patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The incidence of avascular necrosis (AVN) after pediatric femoral neck fracture (PFNF) in the literature varies widely, and the risk factors associated with AVN after PFNF are controversial. Therefore, this study aimed to accurately investigate the incidence of AVN after PFNF and systematically evaluate and meta-classify their risk factors. METHODS: A comprehensive search was performed of PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase. The pooled rate and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to assess the incidence of AVN after PFNF, and pooled odds ratio (OR) were calculated to measure the effect sizes. In addition, we performed subgroup, stratified, and publication bias analyses. RESULTS: A total of 30 articles were included in our meta-analysis, with 303 AVN cases among 1185 patients. The pooled incidence of AVN after PFNF was 22% (95% CI 18%, 27%). Subgroup analyses indicated Delbet type I-IV fracture incidences with AVN of 45%, 32%, 17%, and 12%, respectively. The incidence of AVN after PFNF in Asia was 19%, lower than in Africa at 36%, Europe at 26%, and North America at 23%. In addition, the larger sample size group and the earlier published literature group showed a higher incidence of necrosis. Stratified analyses showed that patient age and Delbet fracture classification were both important factors affecting AVN after PFNF (OR = 1.61, p = 0.02 and OR = 3.02, p < 0.001, respectively), while the time to treatment was not (OR = 0.9, p = 0.71). CONCLUSION: The pooled incidence of AVN after PFNF was ~ 22%; furthermore, the available evidence demonstrates that patient age and Delbet type of fracture were important influencing factors of AVN after PFNF.

The incidence of focal osteonecrosis of the femoral head and its impact on conversion hip arthroplasty after screw fixation of femoral neck fractures: a multicenter retrospective study based on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging.

PURPOSE: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) and subsequent head collapse is a major concern after internal fixation of femoral neck fracture (FNF). Previous studies focused on ONFH incidence using plain radiography; postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was rarely performed. We performed a multicenter retrospective study to investigate the incidence of ONFH and the need for conversion hip arthroplasty after FNF screw fixation. METHODS: We reviewed 195 patients who underwent screw fixation during closed FNF reduction between 2012 and 2017 at three institutions. Except for patients who did not consent to MRI, all patients underwent postoperative MRI either 1-3 years after screw fixation. The occurrence of ONFH was investigated through plain radiography and MRI. RESULTS: Thirty patients were diagnosed with ONFH through plain radiography, and an additional 33 patients were diagnosed with MRI, resulting in a total of 63 patients (32.3%) diagnosed with ONFH. The mean time to ONFH diagnosis was 18.9 months and the conversion rate to hip arthroplasty was 10.2%. Of the 33 patients who were normal on hip radiography but exhibited ONFH on MRI, all had small focal lesions not associated with head collapse at the last follow-up. The ONFH group diagnosed through plain radiography had more unstable FNFs than the group diagnosed through MRI. CONCLUSION: Although postoperative MRI revealed a higher incidence of ONFH after FNF screw fixation than reported previously, the small focal MRI lesions were not associated with increased risks of femoral head collapse or conversion to arthroplasty.

Revisiting prediction of collapse in hip osteonecrosis with artificial intelligence and machine learning: a new approach for quantifying and ranking the contribution and association of factors for collapse.

PURPOSE: This study proposes machine learning to analyze the risk factors of the collapse in patients with non-traumatic hip osteonecrosis of the femoral head. METHODS: We collected data of 900 consecutive patients (634 males) with bilateral (428) or unilateral non-traumatic osteonecrosis diagnosed before collapse (at stage I or stage II). The follow-up was average five years (3 to 8 years). A total of 50 variables related to the osteonecrosis were included in the study. The osteonecroses were randomly divided into a training set (80%) and a validation set (20%) with a similar percentage of hips with collapse in the two groups. Machine learning (ML) algorithms were trained with the selected variables. Performance was evaluated and the different factors (variables) for collapse were ranked with Shapley values. The primary outcome was prediction of occurrence of collapse from automated inventory systems. RESULTS: In this series of patients, the accuracy with machine learning for predicting collapse within three years follow-up was 81.2%. Accuracies for predicting collapse within six to 12-24 months were 54.2%, 67.3%, and 71.2%, respectively, demonstrating that the accuracy is lower for a prevision in the short term than for the mid-term. Despite none of the risk-factors alone achieving statistical significance for prediction, the system allowed ranking the different variables for risk of collapse. The highest risk factors for collapse were sickle cell disease, liver, and cardiac transplantation treated with corticosteroids, osteonecrosis volume > 50% of the femoral head. Cancer (such as leukemia), alcohol abuse, lupus erythematosus, Crohn's disease, pemphigus vulgaris treated with corticosteroids, and osteonecrosis volume between 40 and 50% were medium risk factors for collapse. Familial cluster of collapse, HIV infection, chronic renal failure, nephrotic syndrome, and renal transplantation, when treated with corticosteroids, stage II, osteonecrosis volume between 30 and 40%, chemotherapy, hip pain with VAS > 6, and collapse progression on the contralateral side, were also significant but lowest risk factors. A heat map is proposed to illustrate the ranking of the combinations of the different variables. The highest risk of collapse is obtained with association of various risks factors. CONCLUSION: This study, for the first time, demonstrated prediction of collapse and ranking of factors for collapse with a machine learning system. This study also shows that collapse is due to a multifactorial risk factors.

Femoral Neck Fracture with Avascular Necrosis.

Hip fractures are common in the aging population, with complications such as avascular necrosis. We describe a case of an 85-y-old woman with early avascular necrosis as a complication from femoral neck fracture discovered on routine bone densitometry screening.