Patient- and caregiver-related factors affecting family caregiver burden of urologic cancer patients.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the level of family caregivers' (FC) burden and the extent to which patient- and caregiver-related factors influence the caregiving burden among FCs of urologic cancer (UC) patients. METHOD: A cross-sectional survey was conducted on caregivers of UC patients who sought cancer care. The modified caregiver strain index (MCSI) was used to assess FC burden. RESULTS: Just over half (54.3%) of FCs had moderate/high MCSI scores (score 9-26). By demographics, FCs who were unemployed (OR = 5.55, 95%CI 1.50-20.60) and perceived their current health condition as moderate/poor (OR = 6.05, 95%CI 1.95-18.78) reported higher odds of increased FC burden. Patient performance status played a pivotal role in exacerbating FC burden, whereby the odds of higher FC burden was 13 times higher in caregivers of UC patients having an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance rating score of 3-4 (OR = 13.06, 95%CI 1.44-111.26) than those with a score of 0. Perceived lower levels of confidence in care provision were significantly associated with a higher level of strain (OR = 6.76, 985%CI 1.02-44.90). CONCLUSION: Care recipient performance status was a strong patient-related factor associated with higher FC burden regardless of duration of caregiving and other caregiver-related factors after adjusting for caregiver demographics.

Anxiety, depression and urological cancer outcomes: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: The interplay between physical and mental aspects of a cancer diagnosis are well recognised. However, little consensus exists on the impact of depression and anxiety on urological cancer outcomes. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to investigate the relationship between these conditions and functional or oncological outcomes in urological malignancy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO and Global Health databases up to June 2020. Studies evaluating the relationship of anxiety and depression disorders or symptoms on functional and mortality outcomes were included. Outcome measures included validated urinary, sexual, body image questionnaire scores and all-cause or disease-specific mortality. RESULTS: Of 3,966 studies screened, 25 studies with a total of 175,047 urological cancer patients were included. Significant anxiety and depressive symptoms and disorders were found to impact functional outcomes in several cancer types. A consistent negative association existed for sexual function in prostate, testicular and penile cancer patients. Additionally, poorer urinary function scores were seen in prostate cancer, with increased body image issues in testicular and prostate cancer. Importantly, both overall and disease-specific mortality outcomes were poorer in bladder and prostate cancer patients. CONCLUSIONS: Co-existing depression and anxiety appears to be negatively associated with functional and mortality outcomes in urological cancers. This appears especially evident in male cancers, including prostate and testicular cancer. Although not proving causation, these findings highlight the importance of considering mental wellbeing during follow-up for early recognition and treatment. However, current evidence remains heterogenous, with further studies required exploring patients at risk.

Uro-oncologic patient management during the COVID-19 pandemic: survey findings from an Italian oncologic hub.

Aim: Patient and worker satisfaction at an oncologic hub during the COVID-19 pandemic has never been reported. We addressed this topic. Methods: We conducted a survey to test the views of patients (n = 64) and healthcare professionals (n = 52) involved with our operative protocol. Results: A moderate/severe grade of concern due to the COVID-19 emergency was recorded in 63% of patients versus 75% of hospital staff. High/very high versus low satisfaction grade about preventive strategies to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 contagion was identified in the patients compared with the hospital staff group. Conclusion: Surgical treatment at a hub center of uro-oncologic patients coming from spoke centers is well accepted and should, therefore, be recommended. Preventive strategies to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 contagion in hospital staff members should be implemented.

Lay abstract We provide robust evidence that an oncologic hub center during COVID-19 pandemic represents a credible solution for management of non-deferrable uro-oncologic patients. Specifically, surgical treatment at a hub center of patients coming from spoke centers is well accepted by both patients and hospital staff members. Moreover, collaboration between healthcare workers from spoke and hub centers generates minimal levels of anxiety, while potentially being associated with clinical, surgical and scientific improvement. This said, a more specific focus on recommended strategies to reduce the risk of SARS-CoV-2 contagion at oncologic hub hospitals is warranted.

A Systematic Review and Scoping Analysis of Smoking Cessation after a Urological Cancer Diagnosis.

PURPOSE: Smoking cessation after a urological cancer diagnosis significantly benefits patients. It is not well known how often patients quit after diagnosis or how urologists intervene to support patients' smoking cessation efforts. We examined rates of smoking cessation after diagnosis among patients with urological cancers, and assessed how often patients are given advice and support to quit smoking in the urology setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Following PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted of the available studies on smoking cessation after a urological cancer diagnosis during April 2020 by a trained medical librarian using the MEDLINE®, PsycInfo®, Embase® and Cochrane Central databases. Studies were included based on 3 independent reviews and if they met a priori inclusion/exclusion criteria. In total, 2,568 records were identified, 31 of which were included for final analysis. RESULTS: Four studies (587 patients) reported outcomes related to the prospective implementation of a smoking cessation program with patient-level quit rates ranging from 3.2% to 47.3%. A total of 21 studies (3,669 patients) reported outcomes of passive (no directed, active intervention) smoking cessation after the diagnosis of a urological cancer with widely varying quit rates. In general, the quality of included studies was poor. There was no standardization of the measurement or timing of outcomes, and few studies included validated survey instruments or biochemical confirmation of cessation. A total of 17 studies included data on whether patients received advice to quit smoking after diagnosis. The proportion of patients in each study who were told to quit ranged from 2.8% to 78.3%. CONCLUSIONS: There are few smoking cessation interventions that have been prospectively implemented and reported in the urology literature, and studies on quit rates after diagnosis are limited. The paucity of quality data and lack of smoking cessation interventions being used in routine urological oncology care underscores the need for more rigorous study and implementation of evidence-based practices in this area.

Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Health-Related Quality of Life in Uro-oncologic Patients: What Should We Wait For?

PURPOSE: To investigate the health-related quality of life of uro-oncologic patients whose surgery was postponed without being rescheduled during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From the March 1 to April 26, 2020, major urologic surgeries were drastically reduced at our tertiary-care referral hospital. In order to evaluate health-related quality-of-life outcomes, the SF-36 questionnaire was sent to all patients scheduled for major surgery at our department 3 weeks after the cancellation of the planned surgical procedures because of the COVID-19 emergency. RESULTS: All patients included in the analysis had been awaiting surgery for a median (interquartile range) time of 52.85 (35-72) days. The SF-36 questionnaire measured 8 domains: physical functioning (PF), role limitations due to physical health (PH), role limitations due to emotional problems (RE), energy/fatigue (EF), emotional well-being (EWB), social functioning (SF), bodily pain (BP), general health perceptions (GHP). When considering physical characteristics as measured by the SF-36 questionnaire, PF was 91.5 (50-100) and PH was 82.75 (50-100) with a BP of 79.56 (45-90). For emotional and social aspects, RE was 36.83 (0-100) with a SF of 37.98 (12.5-90). Most patients reported loss of energy (EF 35.28 [15-55]) and increased anxiety (EWB 47.18 [interquartile range, 20-75]). All patients perceived a reduction of their health conditions, with GHP of 49.47 (15-85). Generally, 86% of patients (n = 43) noted an almost intact physical function but a significant emotional alteration characterized by a prevalence of anxiety and loss of energy. CONCLUSION: The lockdown due to the novel coronavirus that has affected most operating rooms in Italy could be responsible for the increased anxiety and decrement in health status of oncologic patients. Without any effective solution, we should expect a new medical catastrophe-one caused by the increased risk of tumor progression and mortality in uro-oncologic patients.

The Psycho-Oncologist-A Critical Role in a Cancer Center Survivorship Program.

Integration of psychosocial oncology services into urological practice can reduce the distress associated with a cancer diagnosis and treatment. Programmatic thinking can expand the services available to patients, moving beyond the psychiatry model of psychotherapy and medication management for mental health issues to programs of care that can support which improve the quality of life and wellbeing of cancer patients across their disease trajectory.

Interface of Psychiatric Services with Urological Oncology Practice.

When developing treatment plans, the optimal approach is to address a patient's illness from multiple directions. Having a psychiatrist as part of the care team allows comprehensive assessment and treatment of behavioral, cognitive, and emotional domains to reduce social/occupational impairment, improve quality of life, and mitigate treatment nonadherence.

"What I was and what I am": A qualitative study of survivors' experience of urological cancer.

PURPOSE: Most qualitative studies do not explore experience throughout the urologic cancer survival trajectory. Moreover, the evidence of the experience of cancer survivors that focuses on the contextual aspects of culture is scarce in oncology literature. This study aimed to analyze the survival experience of urological cancer from the perspective of men. METHOD: This was a narrative research based on the concepts of culture derived from the interpretative medical anthropologic approach. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 male survivors of urological cancer at different survival seasons. Seven participants agreed to a second interview, which resulted in 17 interviews. The data were analyzed using a five-phase thematic analysis approach. The findings are presented as narrative syntheses. The standards for reporting qualitative research (SPQR) was used in this study. RESULTS: Two narrative syntheses were constructed: "The journey of urological cancer: discovering oneself as a survivor" and "What I was and what I am today": the disruption on the body and life. The narrative synthesis shows that survivors undergo transitions of identity from being healthy men to wrecked men. The survivors tried to present themselves as normal men to keep their masculinity intact. However, the experience of survival constituted a process of liminality and biographical disruption. CONCLUSION: The experience of surviving urological cancer has highlighted the physical, emotional, and social challenges experienced by these male survivors. It is recommended to oncology nurses that nursing care should be planned along survival seasons considering the survivors' individual and subjective experiences.

Patients' perception and attitude to totally implantable venous access for urologic or digestive cancer: A cross-sectional study.

INTRODUCTION: Totally implanted venous access (TIVA) improves the safety and welfare of patients treated with cancer chemotherapy (CCT). We aimed to evaluate patients' perception of TIVA placement, TIVA use, and information on TIVA, and to assess the association between patients' perception and their attitude regarding a potential TIVA re-implantation. METHODS: We conducted a single center cross-sectional survey in a university hospital in Northern France. Patients included were consecutive urologic or digestive cancer inpatients admitted for a CCT cycle via TIVA between April 9th and May 9th 2014. We analyzed patients' satisfaction, experience, and attitude, especially when requiring potential TIVA re-implantation under local anesthesia (LA), using a standardized questionnaire and medical records. We analyzed risk factors for refusing potential TIVA re-implantation under LA using multivariate logistic regression. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients were interviewed (no refusals), including 57 with a TIVA device placed under LA in our university hospital. Among them, 52/57 (91%) reported satisfactory TIVA placement, but respectively 21/57 (37%) and 18/57 (32%) complained of painful or uncomfortable TIVA placement; 51/57 (89%) were satisfied with care provided during CCT cycles. Risk factors for refusing potential re-implantation under LA were: TIVA placement considered painful (P=0.012) or uncomfortable (P=0.038) and dissatisfaction with care provided during CCT cycles (P=0.028). DISCUSSION: We show that despite good overall satisfaction regarding TIVA, some aspects were less positive and warrant improvement actions. It suggests that these actions could not only improve patients' experience of TIVA use but could also facilitate continuation of treatment in the long term.

Response shift effects in the assessment of urologic cancer patients' quality of life.

OBJECTIVE: Urologic cancer patients often assess their quality of life (QoL) as being relatively good. Response shift (change in internal standards) may be one reason for that effect. The aim of this study was to test such response shift effects. METHODS: A sample of 197 male urologic cancer patients was tested while hospitalised (t1) and three months later (t2). The participants had to assess their current health state and the health state of two anchoring vignettes. They also completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and PHQ-4 questionnaires, including a retrospective thentest. The control sample was comprised of members of the general population. RESULTS: The patients rated their general health as being worse than people from the general population did (effect size: d = 0.73, p < 0.001). Moreover, the patients assessed the vignette presenting physical problems as being significantly healthier than people from the general population did (d = 0.42, p < 0.001). Under the retrospective thentest condition, the patients rated their QoL and their mental burden as being significantly worse than in the pre-test condition. Both methods showed response shift effects. CONCLUSION: Urologic cancer patients' assessments of their QoL should be handled with caution because of possible shifts in their internal standards of judgement.

Patient, cured, victim or survivor of urological cancer? A qualitative study.

PURPOSE: to describe the meanings that patients attribute to the term cancer survivor and to analyze the identities assumed by them according to their experience with the disease. METHODS: qualitative study with a narrative method, theoretical framework of the medical anthropology and identity concept. The study included 14 participants, men and women, diagnosed with urologic cancer. The semi-structured interviews were performed at the individual's home, after confirming participation. RESULTS: eight participants assumed to be survivors, but five also assumed at least one other identity, in addition to cancer survivor. In contrast, among the six who defined themselves as cured, only one indicated another identity. Four considered themselves as victims and only two as cancer patients. However, the latter - cancer patient and victim - assumed at least one other associated identity. CONCLUSIONS: allowing patients to reflect on themselves and their experience with the disease, as well as attributing themselves a new identity, will be directly related to the wellbeing and momentum the survivor is going through. Therefore, it can direct care in the cancer survivorship phase according to each survivor's individual context.

[Efficacy of a ketogenic diet in urological cancers patients : A systematic review]. / Wirksamkeit der ketogenen Diät bei urologischen Tumorerkrankungen : Ein systematischer Review.

BACKGROUND: Beside the classical anticancer treatment tumor patients try to find proactive alternative therapies to fight their disease. Lifestyle changes such as introducing a ketogenic diet is one of the most popular among them. The German Association of Urological Oncology (AUO, Arbeitsgemeinschaft Urologische Onkologie) presents a systematic review investigating the evidence of ketogenic diet in cancer patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic literature research was conducted in the databases Medline, Livivo, and the Cochrane Library. Only clinical studies of tumor patients receiving chemotherapy while on a ketogenic diet were included. The assessment of the results was performed according to the predefined primary endpoints overall survival and progression-free survival and secondary endpoints quality of life and reduction of adverse effects induced by cytostatics. RESULTS: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria: eight prospective and one retrospective study case series respectively cohort-studies, with a total of 107 patients. Currently there is no evidence of a therapeutic effect of a ketogenic diet in patients with malignant tumors regarding the clinical outcome or quality of life. CONCLUSION: Based on the current data, a ketogenic diet can not be recommended to cancer patients because prospective, randomized trials are missing.

Patient, cured, victim or survivor of urological cancer? A qualitative study / Paciente, curado, vítima ou sobrevivente de câncer urológico? Um estudo qualitativo / ¿Paciente, curado, víctima o sobreviviente de cáncer urológico? Un estudio cualitativo *

ABSTRACT Purpose: to describe the meanings that patients attribute to the term cancer survivor and to analyze the identities assumed by them according to their experience with the disease. Methods: qualitative study with a narrative method, theoretical framework of the medical anthropology and identity concept. The study included 14 participants, men and women, diagnosed with urologic cancer. The semi-structured interviews were performed at the individual's home, after confirming participation. Results: eight participants assumed to be survivors, but five also assumed at least one other identity, in addition to cancer survivor. In contrast, among the six who defined themselves as cured, only one indicated another identity. Four considered themselves as victims and only two as cancer patients. However, the latter - cancer patient and victim - assumed at least one other associated identity. Conclusions: allowing patients to reflect on themselves and their experience with the disease, as well as attributing themselves a new identity, will be directly related to the wellbeing and momentum the survivor is going through. Therefore, it can direct care in the cancer survivorship phase according to each survivor's individual context.

RESUMO Objetivo: descrever os significados que os pacientes atribuem ao termo sobrevivente do câncer e analisar as identidades assumidas por eles de acordo com sua experiência com a doença. Métodos: estudo qualitativo com método narrativo, referencial teórico da antropologia médica e conceito de identidade. O estudo incluiu 14 participantes, homens e mulheres, diagnosticados com câncer urológico. As entrevistas semiestruturadas foram realizadas na residência dos indivíduos, após confirmação da participação. Resultados: oito participantes assumiram ser sobreviventes, mas cinco também assumiram pelo menos uma outra identidade, além de sobrevivente do câncer. Em contraste, entre os seis que se definiram como curados, apenas um indicou outra identidade. Quatro se consideraram como vítimas e apenas dois como pacientes com câncer. No entanto, os últimos - paciente com câncer e vítima - assumiram pelo menos uma outra identidade associada. Conclusões: permitir que os pacientes reflitam sobre si mesmos e sobre sua experiência com a doença, além de se atribuírem uma nova identidade, estará diretamente relacionado com o bem-estar e o momento pelo qual o sobrevivente está passando. Portanto, pode direcionar o cuidado na fase de sobrevivência ao câncer de acordo com o contexto individual de cada sobrevivente.

RESUMEN Objetivo: describir los significados que los pacientes atribuyen al término sobreviviente del cáncer y analizar las identidades asumidas por ellos de acuerdo con su experiencia con la enfermedad. Métodos: estudio cualitativo con método narrativo, referencial teórico de la antropología médica y concepto de identidad. El estudio incluye 14 participantes, hombres y mujeres, diagnosticados con cáncer urológico. Las entrevistas semiestructuradas fueron realizadas en la residencia de los individuos, después de la confirmación de la participación. Resultados: ocho participantes asumieron ser sobrevivientes, pero cinco también asumieron por lo menos otra identidad, además de sobreviviente del cáncer. En contraste, entre los seis que se definieron como curados, solo uno indicó una identidad diferente. Cuatro se consideraron como víctimas y solo dos como pacientes con cáncer. Sin embargo, los últimos - paciente con cáncer y víctima - asumieron por lo menos otra identidad asociada. Conclusiones: permitir que los pacientes reflexionen sobre sí mismos y sobre su experiencia con la enfermedad, además de atribuirse una nueva identidad, estará directamente relacionado con el bienestar y el momento por el cual el sobreviviente está pasando. Por lo tanto, puede direccionar el cuidado en la fase de sobrevivencia al cáncer de acuerdo con el contexto individual de cada sobreviviente.

Psychological distress in patients undergoing surgery for urological cancer: A single centre cross-sectional study.

PURPOSE: Interest in the disease-specific psychological well-being of patients with cancer has increased, and it has been estimated that less than half of all patients with cancer are properly identified and subsequently treated for anxiety or depression. The aim of this study is to evaluate psychological distress in uro-oncological patients undergoing different surgeries: radical cystectomy, radical prostatectomy, radical nephrectomy, or transurethral resection (TUR) before the surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional study in consecutively enrolled patients with bladder, kidney, or prostate cancer, scheduled for surgery. Demographic data, socioeconomic status, education level, and diagnoses were recorded. Patients with a previous diagnosis of depression or anxiety were excluded. We evaluated the level of clinically meaningful depression and anxiety assessed by 2 tools: the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS; score ≥8 presence of anxiety and depression; score ≥11 clinical anxiety and depression) and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). To determine variables related to depression and anxiety among the demographic variables, logistic regression analyses were conducted, with P<0.05 considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: A total of 207 patients were recruited, completed the questionnaires and were included in the study. Patients presented a mean age of 70.8 (±10.8) years, 89% were males (n = 184) and 19% of patients presented previous cancer. The majority of patients underwent surgery for bladder tumors (60.4%) and the most common type of surgery was TUR. The most frequent procedures were performed for bladder tumors (60.4%), being TUR the most common type of surgery (52.7%) followed by radical prostatectomy (24.6%). Mean STAI-State score was 19.3 (±10.3), and mean STAI-Trait score was 18.4 (±11.9) points. Clinical levels of anxiety and depression (HADS ≥ 11 points) were found in 19 (9.8%) and 7 (3.6%) cases. And HADS anxiety 8 to 10 points was present in 14.5% (n = 28) and HADS depression 8 to 10 points in 5.7% (n = 11) of the sample, representing presence of psychological distress. Female patients showed a higher level of anxiety and STAI-Trait compared to males. CONCLUSION: The present results show that our patients had lower levels of anxiety and depression than those described in the literature. Sex, tumor type, and surgical approach were significantly related to psychological distress in patients undergoing surgery for urological cancer. Females and patients with kidney tumor and patients undergoing radical nephrectomy presented higher levels of anxiety. Patients with radical cystectomy showed a higher level of STAI-State compared with other surgeries.

Basic methods for the assessment of health-related quality of life in uro-oncological patients.

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of patients' expectations and quality of life in uro-oncology is considered an important outcome of treatment efficacy and satisfaction. Aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the most frequently adopted tools in uro-oncology to assess Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL). EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic literature search until October 2015 was performed on MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, PubMed combining the following terms: "quality of life," "health-related quality of life," "kidney cancer," "bladder cancer," "prostate cancer." Additional references were obtained from the reference list of full-text manuscripts. Data were synthesized using meta-analytic methods conformed to the PRISMA statement. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: HRQoL is a fundamental step in evaluating treatment outcome in patients with urological cancers. HRQoL is mostly measured through several questionnaires, which are generally categorized in generic questionnaires, exploring the patient's well-being en bloc; specific questionnaires, assessing each single domain of health status; and uro-oncological specific questionnaires, mainly characterized by a modular approach. Although different questionnaires have been proposed and validated, the standard method to be adopted in urology is far from the solution and further studies should investigate the strength and weakness of the different questionnaires. CONCLUSIONS: HRQoL questionnaires should become a standard method to evaluate medical/surgical outcomes in uro-oncology. Their implementation may significantly improve patients' satisfaction and help physicians in the decision-making process and possibly reduce health care costs.

[Social medical/public health assessment of the ability to work regarding urological and urooncological diseases]. / Sozialmedizinische Begutachtung der Arbeits- und Erwerbsfähigkeit bei urologischen/uroonkologischen Erkrankungen.

The primary objectives of modern urooncological treatment concepts are quality of life, reintegration and participation. Urological rehabilitation supports the overcoming of side effects of disease and treatment, which is necessary for the timely return to work life. Social medical assessment reflects the individual overall results of the entire treatment process concerning oncological prognosis, physical and mental capacity and resilience.

'I've used the word cancer but it's actually good news': discursive performativity of cancer and the identity of urological cancer services.

Drawing on the ethnographic study of urological cancer services, this article explores how a set of particular discourses embedded in the everyday clinical work in a large teaching hospital in the UK helps materialise particular configurations of cancer and related professional identities. Emerging on the intersection of specific socio-material arrangements (cancer survival rates, treatment regimens, cancer staging classifications, metaphors, clinical specialities) and operating across a number of differential relations (curable/incurable, treatable/untreatable, aggressive/nonaggressive), these configurations help constitute the categories of 'good' and 'bad' cancers as separate and contrasting entities. These categories help materialise particular distributions of power and are thus implicated in the making of specific claims about the identity of urological cancer services as unique and privileged. Exploring these issues in view of feminist and material-semiotic approaches to studying science, technology and medicine, this article seeks to move away from the understanding of cancer discourses as primarily linguistic performances, proposing to see them instead as arrangements of practices and relations simultaneously material and semiotic through which particular categories, entities and phenomena acquire their determinate nature. In doing so, it seeks to contribute to sociology's broader concern with discursive performativity of cancer.

[Secondary prevention in patients with superficial urothelial carcinoma]. / Sekundäre Prävention bei Patienten mit oberflächlichem Urothelkarzinom.

BACKGROUND: Urothelial cancer is the 4th most common cancer in men and the 7th most common malignancy in women in Germany. 95 % of all tumors of the urinary bladder are urothelial carcinomas. At the time of diagnosis approximately 80 % of these carcinomas are not invasive. The affection is often multicentric. Approximately 10-15 % of the tumors develop into muscle-invasive growth. In this prospective study, we analyzed measures patients independently took to reduce their risk of bladder cancer recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During the period January 2012 to December 2013, we surveyed a total of 97 patients with superficial transitional cell carcinoma (pTa). The question was how far the diagnosis of urothelial cancer has changed their lives, eating and drinking habits or whether follow-up consultations had been carried out regularly. Furthermore, we recorded whether they accepted psychological care or had autonomously adopted prophylactic measures, as well as changed their smoking habits, if they had smoked. RESULTS: Of the 97 patients questioned, there were 79 men and 18 women (56 smokers and 41 nonsmokers). The median age was 71 years (range 36-96 years). For 22 patients (22.7 %), the diagnosis resulted in no changes. In 33 patients the changes were small (44 %), moderate in 20 (26.7 %), in 14 (18.6 %) strong and very strong in 8 (10.7 %). A total of 25 patients (25.8 %) changed their eating habits. In all, 49 patients changed their drinking habits; 48 patients claimed to drink more (> 2.0 L/day). One patient reduced his drinking amount. Regarding smoking, 40 patients (71.4 %) had stopped and 7 (12.5 %) reduced consumption, while 6 patients (10.7 %) had not changed their smoking habits. Overall, 44 patients (45.4 %) changed their physical activity: 11 (25 %) exercised more, 8 (18.1 %) less. Only 3 patients (3.1 %) used psycho-oncological care and 39 (40.2 %) patients used supportive/complementary medicine measures of favorablly influence their disease (mistletoe therapy, vitamin supplements). In addition, 22 patients (22.7 %) sought advice from their physician. However, 45.4 % of all patients did not believe in the success of their measures taken. CONCLUSION: Of all patients diagnosed with urothelial carcinoma, 77.3 % reported a change in their living habits and they were willing to take specific steps, such as giving up smoking, being more physically active, changing drinking and eating habits in order to positively influence their disease. However, almost half of the patients (45.4 %) did not believe in a resounding success of their measures taken.

A qualitative study exploring male cancer patients' experiences with percutaneous nephrostomy.

OBJECTIVE: Obstructive uropathy due to advanced cancer can be efficiently treated with a percutaneous nephrostomy. The treatment is associated with complications and frequent readmissions. How the patients' quality of life is affected by a nephrostomy remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to describe how a nephrostomy is perceived by patients and its effects on their everyday lives. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted in the patients' home using a mind map. The inclusion criteria were locally advanced or metastatic urological cancer treated with a nephrostomy for a minimum of 1 month. All interviews were audio recorded, transcribed and analysed using a grounded theory approach. Ten male patients were interviewed, eight with prostate cancer and two with bladder cancer. RESULTS: Treatment with nephrostomy influenced the physical activity level and restricted normal social activities. Readmissions had a negative influence on mood. However, the patients who experienced symptom improvement were thankful for having had the nephrostomy, despite the inconveniences. Communicating about the hazards and benefits helped patients to adjust their expectations of a nephrostomy. CONCLUSIONS: The study describes how nephrostomy is a burdensome intervention accompanied by a plethora of complex physical and psychosocial issues. Having a nephrostomy on a palliative indication has extensive implications for the patients, which should not be neglected or underestimated. Individual assessment of each patient, together with excellent communication regarding the procedure and outcome, is essential. Most patients had frequent contact with the healthcare system and additional support could be offered by a palliative care service.

Distress in cancer patients and their caregivers and association with the caregivers' perception of dyadic communication.

BACKGROUND: Discrepancies within cancer-affected couples can disrupt security within the dyadic relationship during cancer treatment. This study investigated the patients' and caregivers' distress and associations between the caregivers' perception of the patients' degree of open communication and their distress. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: In a cross-sectional survey, 189 pairs of cancer patients (31% gastrointestinal, 34% lung, 35% urological cancers) and their partners were assessed for distress (QSC-R10), depression and anxiety (PHQ-2/GAD-2). The caregivers also reported their perception of the patients' degree of disclosure regarding cancer-relevant topics (CCAT-F Disclosure subscale), caregiver strain (CSI), and unmet needs (SCNS-P&C). Prevalences of clinically significant distress were calculated. Associations were calculated between the caregivers' and the patients' ratings and between the caregivers' distress and their perception of the patients' degree of disclosure. RESULTS: 33% of the caregivers and 25% of the patients exhibited significant anxiety, with a tendency towards a higher frequency in the caregivers (p = 0.10). The prevalence of depression was lower but equally high in caregivers and patients. The caregivers' perceived non-disclosure by the patients was primarily associated with their anxiety (r = 0.31), disease-specific distress (r = 0.32), and psychological/emotional needs (r = 0.35). CONCLUSION: The identification of caregivers reporting problems in communicating with patients should be pursued in clinical practice as this might indicate that caregivers are particularly burdened.