Real-World Use of Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Primary CNS Tumors in the Elderly, and Implications on Medicare Spending.

BACKGROUND: For elderly patients with high-grade gliomas, 3-week hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) is noninferior to standard long-course radiotherapy (LCRT). We analyzed real-world utilization of HFRT with and without systemic therapy in Medicare beneficiaries treated with RT for primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors using Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services data. METHODS: Radiation modality, year, age (65-74, 75-84, or ≥85 years), and site of care (freestanding vs hospital-affiliated) were evaluated. Utilization of HFRT (11-20 fractions) versus LCRT (21-30 or 31-40 fractions) and systemic therapy was evaluated by multivariable logistic regression. Medicare spending over the 90-day episode after RT planning initiation was analyzed using multivariable linear regression. RESULTS: From 2015 to 2019, a total of 10,702 RT courses (ie, episodes) were included (28% HFRT; 65% of patients aged 65-74 years). A considerable minority died within 90 days of RT planning initiation (n=1,251; 12%), and 765 (61%) of those received HFRT. HFRT utilization increased (24% in 2015 to 31% in 2019; odds ratio [OR], 1.2 per year; 95% CI, 1.1-1.2) and was associated with older age (≥85 vs 65-74 years; OR, 6.8; 95% CI, 5.5-8.4), death within 90 days of RT planning initiation (OR, 5.0; 95% CI, 4.4-5.8), hospital-affiliated sites (OR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.3-1.6), conventional external-beam RT (vs intensity-modulated RT; OR, 2.7; 95% CI, 2.3-3.1), and no systemic therapy (OR, 1.2; 95% CI, 1.1-1.3; P<.001 for all). Increasing use of HFRT was concentrated in hospital-affiliated sites (P=.002 for interaction). Most patients (69%) received systemic therapy with no differences by site of care (P=.12). Systemic therapy utilization increased (67% in 2015 to 71% in 2019; OR, 1.1 per year; 95% CI, 1.0-1.1) and was less likely for older patients, patients who died within 90 days of RT planning initiation, those who received conventional external-beam RT, and those who received HFRT. HFRT significantly reduced spending compared with LCRT (adjusted ß for LCRT = +$8,649; 95% CI, $8,544-$8,755), whereas spending modestly increased with systemic therapy (adjusted ß for systemic therapy = +$270; 95% CI, $176-$365). CONCLUSIONS: Although most Medicare beneficiaries received LCRT for primary brain tumors, HFRT utilization increased in hospital-affiliated centers. Despite high-level evidence for elderly patients, discrepancy in HFRT implementation by site of care persists. Further investigation is needed to understand why patients with short survival may still receive LCRT, because this has major quality-of-life and Medicare spending implications.

Comparative analysis of bevacizumab and LITT for treating radiation necrosis in previously radiated CNS neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Radiation necrosis (RN) is a local inflammatory reaction that arises in response to radiation injury and may cause significant morbidity. This study aims to evaluate and compare the efficacy of bevacizumab and laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) in treating RN in patients with previously radiated central nervous system (CNS) neoplasms. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, Scopus, and EMBASE databases were screened. Studies of patients with radiation necrosis from primary or secondary brain tumors were included. Indirect meta-analysis with random-effect modeling was performed to compare clinical and radiological outcomes. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies were included with 210 patients in the bevacizumab group and 337 patients in the LITT group. Bevacizumab demonstrated symptomatic improvement/stability in 87.7% of cases, radiological improvement/stability in 86.2%, and steroid wean-off in 45%. LITT exhibited symptomatic improvement/stability in 71.2%, radiological improvement/stability in 64.7%, and steroid wean-off in 62.4%. Comparative analysis revealed statistically significant differences favoring bevacizumab in symptomatic improvement/stability (p = 0.02), while no significant differences were observed in radiological improvement/stability (p = 0.27) or steroid wean-off (p = 0.90). The rates of adverse reactions were 11.2% for bevacizumab and 14.9% for LITT (p = 0.66), with the majority being grade 2 or lower (72.2% for bevacizumab and 62.5% for LITT). CONCLUSION: Both bevacizumab and LITT exhibited favorable clinical and radiological outcomes in managing RN. Bevacizumab was found to be associated with better symptomatic control compared to LITT. Patient-, diagnosis- and lesion-related factors should be considered when choosing the ideal treatment modality for RN to enhance overall patient outcomes.

[External radiation therapy of primary central nervous system tumors - current trends and practice]. / A primer központi idegrendszeri tumorok konvencionális külso sugárkezelése ­ aktuális trendek és gyakorlat.

The family of primary central nervous system (CNS) tumors is a highly heterogeneous group of diseases. In the complex care of CNS tumors, in addition to surgical and systemic treatments, modern external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) plays a prominent role. This summary article provides an overview of the current indications related to EBRT, diagnostic procedures, contouring, planning, and radiation therapy techniques and applications that can be used in daily routine for adults' most common primary CNS tumors.

Brain and Brain Stem Necrosis After Reirradiation for Recurrent Childhood Primary Central Nervous System Tumors: A PENTEC Comprehensive Review.

PURPOSE: Reirradiation is increasingly used in children and adolescents/young adults (AYA) with recurrent primary central nervous system tumors. The Pediatric Normal Tissue Effects in the Clinic (PENTEC) reirradiation task force aimed to quantify risks of brain and brain stem necrosis after reirradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A systematic literature search using the PubMed and Cochrane databases for peer-reviewed articles from 1975 to 2021 identified 92 studies on reirradiation for recurrent tumors in children/AYA. Seventeen studies representing 449 patients who reported brain and brain stem necrosis after reirradiation contained sufficient data for analysis. While all 17 studies described techniques and doses used for reirradiation, they lacked essential details on clinically significant dose-volume metrics necessary for dose-response modeling on late effects. We, therefore, estimated incidences of necrosis with an exact 95% CI and qualitatively described data. Results from multiple studies were pooled by taking the weighted average of the reported crude rates from individual studies. RESULTS: Treated cancers included ependymoma (n = 279 patients; 7 studies), medulloblastoma (n = 98 patients; 6 studies), any CNS tumors (n = 62 patients; 3 studies), and supratentorial high-grade gliomas (n = 10 patients; 1 study). The median interval between initial and reirradiation was 2.3 years (range, 1.2-4.75 years). The median cumulative prescription dose in equivalent dose in 2-Gy fractions (EQD22; assuming α/ß value = 2 Gy) was 103.8 Gy (range, 55.8-141.3 Gy). Among 449 reirradiated children/AYA, 22 (4.9%; 95% CI, 3.1%-7.3%) developed brain necrosis and 14 (3.1%; 95% CI, 1.7%-5.2%) developed brain stem necrosis with a weighted median follow-up of 1.6 years (range, 0.5-7.4 years). The median cumulative prescription EQD22 was 111.4 Gy (range, 55.8-141.3 Gy) for development of any necrosis, 107.7 Gy (range, 55.8-141.3 Gy) for brain necrosis, and 112.1 Gy (range, 100.2-117 Gy) for brain stem necrosis. The median latent period between reirradiation and the development of necrosis was 5.7 months (range, 4.3-24 months). Though there were more events among children/AYA undergoing hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated reirradiation, the differences were not statistically significant (P = .46). CONCLUSIONS: Existing reports suggest that in children/AYA with recurrent brain tumors, reirradiation with a total EQD22 of about 112 Gy is associated with an approximate 5% to 7% incidence of brain/brain stem necrosis after a median follow-up of 1.6 years (with the initial course of radiation therapy being given with conventional prescription doses of ≤2 Gy per fraction and the second course with variable fractionations). We recommend a uniform approach for reporting dosimetric endpoints to derive robust predictive models of late toxicities following reirradiation.

The effectiveness and safety of proton beam radiation therapy in children and young adults with Central Nervous System (CNS) tumours: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Central nervous system (CNS) tumours account for around 25% of childhood neoplasms. With multi-modal therapy, 5-year survival is at around 75% in the UK. Conventional photon radiotherapy has made significant contributions to survival, but can be associated with long-term side effects. Proton beam radiotherapy (PBT) reduces the volume of irradiated tissue outside the tumour target volume which may potentially reduce toxicity. Our aim was to assess the effectiveness and safety of PBT and make recommendations for future research for this evolving treatment. METHODS: A systematic review assessing the effects of PBT for treating CNS tumours in children/young adults was undertaken using methods recommended by Cochrane and reported using PRISMA guidelines. Any study design was included where clinical and toxicity outcomes were reported. Searches were to May 2021, with a narrative synthesis employed. RESULTS: Thirty-one case series studies involving 1731 patients from 10 PBT centres were included. Eleven studies involved children with medulloblastoma / primitive neuroectodermal tumours (n = 712), five ependymoma (n = 398), four atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumour (n = 72), six craniopharyngioma (n = 272), three low-grade gliomas (n = 233), one germ cell tumours (n = 22) and one pineoblastoma (n = 22). Clinical outcomes were the most frequently reported with overall survival values ranging from 100 to 28% depending on the tumour type. Endocrine outcomes were the most frequently reported toxicity outcomes with quality of life the least reported. CONCLUSIONS: This review highlights areas of uncertainty in this research area. A well-defined, well-funded research agenda is needed to best maximise the potential of PBT. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO-CRD42016036802.

Craniospinal irradiation for CNS leukemia: rates of response and durability of CNS control.

PURPOSE: Management of CNS involvement in leukemia may include craniospinal irradiation (CSI), though data on CSI efficacy are limited. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed leukemia patients who underwent CSI at our institution between 2009 and 2021 for CNS involvement. CNS local recurrence (CNS-LR), any recurrence, progression-free survival (PFS), CNS PFS, and overall survival (OS) were estimated. RESULTS: Of thirty-nine eligible patients treated with CSI, most were male (59%) and treated as young adults (median 31 years). The median dose was 18 Gy to the brain and 12 Gy to the spine. Twenty-five (64%) patients received CSI immediately prior to allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant, of which 21 (84%) underwent total body irradiation conditioning (median 12 Gy). Among 15 patients with CSF-positive disease immediately prior to CSI, all 14 assessed patients had pathologic clearance of blasts (CNS-response rate 100%) at a median of 23 days from CSI start. With a median follow-up of 48 months among survivors, 2-year PFS and OS were 32% (95% CI 18-48%) and 43% (95% CI 27-58%), respectively. Only 5 CNS relapses were noted (2-year CNS-LR 14% (95% CI 5-28%)), which occurred either concurrently or after a systemic relapse. Only systemic relapse after CSI was associated with higher risk of CNS-LR on univariate analysis. No grade 3 or higher acute toxicity was seen during CSI. CONCLUSION: CSI is a well-tolerated and effective treatment option for patients with CNS leukemia. Control of systemic disease after CSI may be important for CNS local control. CNS recurrence may reflect reseeding from the systemic space.

Treatment Outcome of Response-Based Radiation Therapy in Children and Adolescents With Central Nervous System Nongerminomatous Germ Cell Tumors: Results of a Prospective Study.

PURPOSE: The optimal dose and range of radiation therapy for central nervous system nongerminomatous germ cell tumors (NGGCTs) have not been uniformly established. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the effect of individualized radiation therapy, based on the response to induction chemotherapy combined with surgery, on the prognosis of patients with NGGCTs. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Based on the imaging examination and tumor markers after induction chemotherapy and pathologic results of second-look surgery, patients with NGGCT received different radiation therapy strategies, including 30.6 Gy whole ventricular irradiation + tumor-bed boost to 54 Gy, 30.6 Gy craniospinal irradiation + tumor-bed boost to 54 Gy, 36 Gy craniospinal irradiation + tumor-bed boost to 54 Gy, and 36 Gy craniospinal irradiation + 54 Gy tumor-bed boost with 45 Gy to metastatic spinal lesions. RESULTS: A total of 51 patients were enrolled between January 2015 and March 2021, with a median age of 10.3 years. The 3-year event-free survival and overall survival (OS) of the entire cohort were 70.2% ± 6.9% and 77.5% ± 6.0%, respectively. The 3-year OS of patients achieving partial response after induction chemotherapy was higher than that of patients with stable disease (P = .03) or progressive disease (P = .002). The 3-year event-free survival and OS of the 18 patients receiving 30.6 Gy whole ventricular irradiation and 54 Gy tumor-bed boost were 88.9% ± 7.4% and 94.4% ± 5.4%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that an individualized radiation therapy strategy based on response to induction chemotherapy and surgery is a feasible and promising means of achieving reduction in dose and extent of radiation in patients while still providing good response.

Mitigating Radiotoxicity in the Central Nervous System: Role of Proton Therapy.

OPINION STATEMENT: Central nervous system (CNS) radiotoxicity remains a challenge in neuro-oncology. Dose distribution advantages of protons over photons have prompted increased use of brain-directed proton therapy. While well-recognized among pediatric populations, the benefit of proton therapy among adults with CNS malignancies remains controversial. We herein discuss the role of protons in mitigating late CNS radiotoxicities in adult patients. Despite limited clinical trials, evidence suggests toxicity profile advantages of protons over conventional radiotherapy, including retention of neurocognitive function and brain volume. Modelling studies predict superior dose conformality of protons versus state-of-the-art photon techniques reduces late radiogenic vasculopathies, endocrinopathies, and malignancies. Conversely, potentially higher brain tissue necrosis rates following proton therapy highlight a need to resolve uncertainties surrounding the impact of variable biological effectiveness of protons on dose distribution. Clinical trials comparing best photon and particle-based therapy are underway to establish whether protons substantially improve long-term treatment-related outcomes in adults with CNS malignancies.

Radiotherapy for Primary Pediatric Central Nervous System Malignancies: Current Treatment Paradigms and Future Directions.

BACKGROUND: Central nervous system tumors are the most common solid tumors in childhood. Treatment paradigms for pediatric central nervous system malignancies depend on elements including tumor histology, age of patient, and stage of disease. Radiotherapy is an important modality of treatment for many pediatric central nervous system malignancies. SUMMARY: While radiation contributes to excellent overall survival rates for many patients, radiation also carries significant risks of long-term side effects including neurocognitive decline, hearing loss, growth impairment, neuroendocrine dysfunction, strokes, and secondary malignancies. In recent decades, clinical trials have demonstrated that with better imaging and staging along with more sophisticated radiation planning and treatment set-up verification, smaller treatment volumes can be utilized without decrement in survival. Furthermore, the development of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and proton-beam radiotherapy has greatly improved conformality of radiation. KEY MESSAGES: Recent changes in radiation treatment paradigms have decreased risks of short- and long-term toxicity for common histologies and in different age groups. Future studies will continue to develop novel radiation regimens to improve outcomes in aggressive central nervous system tumors, integrate molecular subtypes to tailor radiation treatment, and decrease radiation-associated toxicity for long-term survivors.

Treatment outcomes for response-based radiotherapy in children and adolescents with central nervous system germinoma: a prospective study.

PURPOSE: The optimal dose and range of radiotherapy for central nervous system (CNS) germinoma have not yet been established. This study aimed to investigate the effects of individualized radiotherapy on the prognosis of patients with germinoma. METHODS: Based on imaging examination, tumor markers, and pathologic results, patients with germinoma received different radiotherapy strategies, including R1 (24 Gy whole ventricular irradiation + tumor-bed boost to 40 Gy), R2 (24-30 Gy craniospinal irradiation + tumor-bed boost to 54 Gy), R3 (24 Gy craniospinal irradiation + tumor-bed boost to 40 Gy), and R4 (30 Gy craniospinal irradiation + tumor-bed boost to 54 Gy with 45 Gy to spinal metastasis). RESULTS: A total of 77 patients were enrolled in this study between January 2015 and March 2021. The 3-year event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) of the whole cohort were 94.7% ± 2.6% and 96.0% ± 2.3%, respectively. The 3-year EFS for patients with localized and metastatic disease were 96.6% ± 2.4% and 89.2% ± 7.2%, respectively. The 3-year EFS of patients receiving R1, R2, R3, and R4 radiotherapy were 100%, 94.1% ± 5.7%, 100%, and 86.2% ± 9.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Good prognosis was still achieved after reducing dose and extent of radiation for the patients who achieved complete response (CR) after induction chemotherapy or pathological CR after second-look surgery.

Brain radiotherapy in patients treated for a newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma: professional practice evaluation in 19 French centers.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study was a multicentric evaluation of professional practices, analyzing the irradiation technique itself and its impact on survival and recurrence sites, in primary central nervous system lymphomas (PCNSLs). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the technical and clinical records of 79 PCNSL patients included in the database of the national expert network for oculocerebral lymphoma ('LOC') who were treated with brain radiotherapy as first-line treatment for newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma between 2011 and 2018. RESULTS: The number of patients treated with brain radiotherapy gradually decreased over time. The heterogeneity of radiotherapy prescriptions was significant, and 55% of them did not comply with published recommendations in terms of irradiation dose and/or volume. The proportion of complete responders to induction chemotherapy treated with reduced-dose radiotherapy increased over time. Partial brain radiotherapy was associated with significantly lower overall survival in univariate analysis. In partial responders to induction chemotherapy, increasing the total dose to the brain >30 Gy and adding a boost to the WBRT induced a trend toward improved progression-free and overall survival. Five recurrences (13%) occurred exclusively in the eyes, all in patients whose eyes had been excluded from the irradiation target volume and including 2 patients without ocular involvement at diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The visibility of recommendations for prescribing brain radiotherapy for the treatment of newly diagnosed primary central nervous system lymphoma needs to be improved to harmonize practices and improve their quality. We propose an update of the recommendations.

Social cognition and adjustment in adult survivors of pediatric central nervous system tumors.

BACKGROUND: Survivors of pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors are at risk for neurocognitive and social difficulties throughout childhood. This study characterized social cognition (perception and reasoning from social cues) and adjustment in adulthood. METHODS: A total of 81 adult survivors of pediatric CNS tumors (51% female; mean [SD] age, 28.0 [5.8] years), were recruited across four groups: (1) no radiation therapy (RT) [n = 21], (2) infratentorial (IT) tumors + focal RT [n = 20], (3) IT tumors + craniospinal irradiation [n = 20], and (4) supratentorial tumors + focal RT [n = 20]. Prevalence of social cognitive and adjustment impairments was compared to test norms. Multivariable models examined clinical and neurocognitive predictors of social cognition and its impact on functional outcomes. RESULTS: Survivors demonstrated elevated risk of severe social cognitive impairments (social perception Morbidity Ratio [95% CI] 5.70 [3.46-9.20]), but self-reported few social adjustment problems. Survivors of IT tumors treated with craniospinal irradiation performed nearly 1 SD worse than survivors treated without RT on multiple measures of social cognition (e.g., social perception: ß = -0.89, p = .004). Impaired executive functioning and nonverbal reasoning were associated with worse social cognitive performance (e.g., social perception: ß = -0.75, p < .001; ß = -0.84, p < .001, respectively). Better social perception was associated with higher odds of attaining full-time employment (odds ratio, 1.52 [1.17-1.97]) and at least some college education (odds ratio, 1.39 [1.11-1.74]). CONCLUSIONS: Adult survivors of CNS tumors are at elevated risk of severely impaired social cognition, but do not perceive social adjustment difficulties. Better understanding of potential mechanisms underlying social cognitive deficits may inform intervention targets to promote better functional outcomes for at-risk survivors.

[A single-center, retrospective analysis of relapse and progression patterns of primary central nervous system lymphoma: can whole brain radiotherapy be replaced?]

OBJECTIVE: To analyze recurrence and progression patterns of primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) in patients without whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) and assess the value of WBRT in PCNSL treatment. METHODS: This retrospective single-center study included 27 patients with PCNSL, who experienced recurrence/progression after achieving complete remission (CR), partial remission, or stable disease following initial treatments with chemotherapy but without WBRT. The patients were followed up regularly after the treatment for treatment efficacy assessment. By comparing the anatomical location of the lesions on magnetic resonance images (MRI) at the initial diagnosis and at recurrence/progression, we analyzed the patterns of relapse/progression in patients with different treatment responses and different initial status of the lesions. RESULTS: MRI data showed that in 16 (59.26%) of the 27 patients, recurrence/progression occurred in out-field area (outside the simulated clinical target volume [CTV]) but within the simulated WBRT target area in 16 (59.26%) patients, and within the CTV (in-field) in 11 (40.74%) patients. None of the patients had extracranial recurrence of the tumor. Of the 11 patients who achieved CR after the initial treatments, 9 (81.82%) had PCNSL recurrences in the out-field area but within WBRT target area; of the 13 patients with a single lesion at the initial treatment, 11 (84.62%) experienced PCNSL recurrence in the out-field area but within WBRT target area. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic therapy combined with WBRT still remains the standard treatment for PCNSL patients, especially those who achieve CR after treatment or have a single initial lesion. Future prospective studies with larger sample sizes are needed to further explore the role of low-dose WBRT in PCNSL treatment.

Critical Appraisal of Proton Therapy for Patients with Central Nervous System (CNS) Malignancies.

OPINION STATEMENT: As more hospital-based proton treatment centres become operational, the indications for proton beam therapy (PBT) are being evaluated. Recent advances in PBT technology are expanding the indications for the use of protons in the treatment of central nervous system (CNS) tumours. Prospective trials that assess the late toxicity of different radiation therapy (RT) techniques are needed to confirm any expected reduction in long-term side effects with PBT. The ASTRO Model Policy on proton beam therapy currently supports the reasonable use of protons in the treatment of specific CNS tumour types. Specifically, PBT plays a key role in the management of CNS tumours where anatomy, extent of disease or previous treatment cannot be satisfactorily addressed with conventional RT. As the availability of PBT rises around the world, the number of patients with CNS disease treated with PBT will continue to grow.

Genetic susceptibility to cognitive decline following craniospinal irradiation for pediatric central nervous system tumors.

BACKGROUND: Survivors of pediatric central nervous system (CNS) tumors treated with craniospinal irradiation (CSI) exhibit long-term cognitive difficulties. Goals of this study were to evaluate longitudinal effects of candidate and novel genetic variants on cognitive decline following CSI. METHODS: Intelligence quotient (IQ), working memory (WM), and processing speed (PS) were longitudinally collected from patients treated with CSI (n = 241). Genotype-by-time interactions were evaluated using mixed-effects linear regression to identify common variants (minor allele frequency > 1%) associated with cognitive performance change. Novel variants associated with cognitive decline (P < 5 × 10-5) in individuals of European ancestry (n = 163) were considered replicated if they demonstrated consistent genotype-by-time interactions (P < .05) in individuals of non-European ancestries (n = 78) and achieved genome-wide statistical significance (P < 5 × 10-8) in a meta-analysis across ancestry groups. RESULTS: Participants were mostly males (65%) diagnosed with embryonal tumors (98%) at a median age of 8.3 years. Overall, 1150 neurocognitive evaluations were obtained (median = 5, range: 2-10 per participant). One of the five loci previously associated with cognitive outcomes in pediatric CNS tumors survivors demonstrated significant time-dependent IQ declines (PPARA rs6008197, P = .004). Two variants associated with IQ in the general population were associated with declines in IQ after Bonferroni correction (rs9348721, P = 1.7 × 10-5; rs31771, P = 7.8 × 10-4). In genome-wide analyses, we identified novel loci associated with accelerated declines in IQ (rs116595313, meta-P = 9.4 × 10-9), WM (rs17774009, meta-P = 4.2 × 10-9), and PS (rs77467524, meta-P = 1.5 × 10-8; rs17630683, meta-P = 2.0 × 10-8; rs73249323, meta-P = 3.1 × 10-8). CONCLUSIONS: Inherited genetic variants involved in baseline cognitive functioning and novel susceptibility loci jointly influence the degree of treatment-associated cognitive decline in pediatric CNS tumor survivors.

Radiotherapy for Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumor (ATRT) on the Pediatric Proton/Photon Consortium Registry (PPCR).

PURPOSE: Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (ATRT) of the central nervous system (CNS) are rare tumors with a poor prognosis and variable use of either focal or craniospinal (CSI) radiotherapy (RT). Outcomes on the prospective Pediatric Proton/Photon Consortium Registry (PPCR) were evaluated according to RT delivered. METHODS: Pediatric patients receiving RT were prospectively enrolled on PPCR to collect initial patient, disease, and treatment factors as well as provide follow-up for patient outcomes. All ATRT patients with evaluable data were included. Kaplan-Meier analyses with log-rank p-values and cox proportional hazards regression were performed. RESULTS: The PPCR ATRT cohort includes 68 evaluable ATRT patients (median age 2.6 years, range 0.71-15.40) from 2012 to 2021. Median follow-up was 40.8 months (range 3.4-107.7). Treatment included surgery (65% initial gross total resection or GTR), chemotherapy (60% with myeloablative therapy including stem cell rescue) and RT. For patients with M0 stage (n = 60), 50 (83%) had focal RT and 10 (17%) had CSI. Among patients with M + stage (n = 8), 3 had focal RT and 5 had CSI. Four-year overall survival (OS, n = 68) was 56% with no differences observed between M0 and M + stage patients (p = 0.848). Local Control (LC) at 4 years did not show a difference for lower primary dose (50-53.9 Gy) compared to ≥ 54 Gy (73.3% vs 74.7%, p = 0.83). For patients with M0 disease, four-year OS for focal RT was 54.6% and for CSI was 60% (Hazard Ratio 1.04, p = 0.95. Four-year event free survival (EFS) among M0 patients for focal RT was 45.6% and for CSI was 60% (Hazard Ratio 0.71, p = 0.519). For all patients, the 4-year OS comparing focal RT with CSI was 54.4% vs 60% respectively (p = 0.944), and the 4-year EFS for focal RT or CSI was 42.8% vs 51.4% respectively (p = 0.610). CONCLUSION: The PPCR ATRT cohort found no differences in outcomes according to receipt of either higher primary dose or larger RT field (CSI). However, most patients were M0 and received focal RT. A lower primary dose (50.4 Gy), regardless of patient age, is appealing for further study as part of multi-modality therapy.