Educational telerehabilitation program for women with pelvic floor dysfunctions after gynecological pelvic cancer treatment: protocol study for a randomized and controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Educational and self-care measures are important for women after gynecological pelvic cancer treatment. Pelvic floor muscle training exercises (PFMT) are a conservative treatment for pelvic floor (PF) dysfunction. The purpose is to evaluate the impact of a telerehabilitation and self-care program on PF dysfunctions, reports of urinary incontinence (UI), and physical-emotional factors of participants post-treatment for gynecological pelvic cancer. METHODS: Two-arm randomized clinical trial: an intervention group (IG) will evaluate the effect of a telerehabilitation program on women undergoing clinical practice of radiotherapy for the treatment of gynecological pelvic cancer and a control group (CG) will maintain the routine. Primary outcome is the prevalence of reports of UI, which will be assessed using the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF). The secondary outcomes will be the severity and impact of UI on quality of life, location and perception of pain intensity, presence and intensity of dyspareunia, vaginal stenosis, fecal incontinence (FI), and levels of physical activity. Statistical analysis will be performed by intention-to-treat, and multivariate mixed effects analysis will be used to compare results. DISCUSSION: Activities in the context of telerehabilitation using PFMT and self-care can represent a viable and effective solution to minimize the side effects of gynecological cancer treatment and improve women's quality of life.

Recommendations for Physiotherapy in Breast and Gynecological Cancer during COVID-19 Pandemic: Literature Review / Recomendações para Fisioterapia em Oncologia Mamária e Ginecológica durante a Pandemia de COVID-19: Revisão da Literatura / Recomendaciones de Fisioterapia en Oncología Mamaria y Ginecológica durante la Pandemia Covid-19: Revisión de Literatura

Introduction: Considering COVID-19 pandemic, physiotherapeutic care for breast and gynecological cancer has the challenge of continuing or beginning the treatment, preventing or treating complications. Objective: To offer guidance about physiotherapy for breast and gynecological cancer during and after the COVID-19 pandemic. Method: Descriptive study produced after a public consultation about the theme and based on literature review and opinions of a group of experts. To classify the strength of the recommendations of the outcomes included, the GRADE system was used. Results: 82 Brazilian physiotherapists responded the online survey. Most of the professionals (36.6%) reported they needed information about the use of personal protective equipment and its hygiene, 18.3%, control and prevention of lymphedema, bandaging and skin care and 17.1%, pelvic floor dysfunction. The analysis of the public consultation, literature review and expert's consensus resulted in recommendations related to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic over the care to women undergoing breast or gynecological cancer treatment and on physiotherapy follow-up; on telephysiotherapy follow-up of the most prevalent complications; on women in palliative care and safety after resuming in-person consultation. Aspects of the decision making in relation to the format of the sessions were discussed and the criteria to return to in-person routine. Conclusion: This manuscript recommends the continuation of the physiotherapy services during and after the COVID-19 pandemic highlighting the educative and self-applied components of the sessions, prioritizing a physical activity plan and specific exercises to contribute for better quality of life of the women.

Introdução: Considerando a pandemia de Covid-19 e a assistência fisioterapêutica nos cânceres de mama e ginecológico, o desafio tem sido continuar ou iniciar a fisioterapia para prevenir ou tratar complicações. Objetivo: Oferecer recomendações voltadas à fisioterapia para os cânceres de mama e ginecológico durante o período de Covid-19. Método: Estudo descritivo produzido após consulta pública sobre o tema, baseado na revisão da literatura e nas considerações de grupo de especialistas. Para graduar a força das recomendações para os desfechos incluídos, utilizou-se o sistema GRADE. Resultados: Oitenta e dois fisioterapeutas de diferentes regiões brasileiras responderam à pesquisa, remotamente. A maioria (36,6%) relatou necessidade de informação sobre equipamento de proteção individual e sua higiene; 18,3% sobre controle e prevenção de linfedema, enfaixamento compressivo e cuidados com a pele; e 17,1% sobre disfunção do assoalho pélvico. A análise da consulta pública, revisão da literatura e considerações dos especialistas resultaram nas recomendações sobre: impacto da pandemia de Covid-19 no acompanhamento fisioterapêutico das mulheres submetidas ao tratamento oncológico mamário ou ginecológico; acompanhamento das complicações mais prevalentes por meio da telefisioterapia; atenção às mulheres em cuidados paliativos; e segurança na assistência após retorno presencial. Aspectos da tomada de decisão em relação ao formato das sessões e critérios de retorno à rotina presencial foram discutidos. Conclusão: Este manuscrito recomenda a continuidade da fisioterapia durante e após a pandemia de Covid-19, destacando componentes educativos e de autoaplicação, priorizando um plano de atividade física e exercícios específicos para contribuir para melhor qualidade de vida das mulheres.

Introducción: Considerando la pandemia de Covid-19 y la asistencia de fisioterapia en cáncer de mama y ginecológico, el desafío ha sido continuar o iniciar la fisioterapia para prevenir o tratar complicaciones. Objetivo: Ofrecer recomendaciones de fisioterapia para el cáncer de mama y ginecológico durante la pandemia. Método: Estudio descriptivo elaborado tras una consulta pública sobre el tema, basado en una revisión de la literatura y consideraciones de expertos. Para calificar la fuerza de las recomendaciones se utilizó el sistema GRADE. Resultados: Ochenta y dos fisioterapeutas brasileños respondieron a la encuesta; 36,6% refirió la necesidad de información sobre equipos de protección personal e higiene; 18,3% en el control y prevención del linfedema, vendajes compresivos y cuidado de la piel; 17,1% en disfunción del suelo pélvico. El análisis de la consulta pública, la revisión de la literatura y las consideraciones de los expertos dieron como resultado las recomendaciones sobre: impacto de la pandemia Covid-19 en el seguimiento fisioterapéutico de mujeres sometidas a tratamiento por cáncer de mama y ginecológico; seguimiento de las complicaciones más prevalentes mediante teleterapia; atención a mujeres en cuidados paliativos; y seguridad en la asistencia después del regreso en persona. Se discutieron aspectos de la toma de decisión y sen relación al formato de las sesiones y criterios para volver a la rutina presencial. Conclusión: Este manuscrito presenta algunas recomendaciones para la continuidad de la fisioterapia durante la pandemia, destacando los componentes educativos y de autorrealización de las guías, y priorizando un plan de actividad física y ejercicios específicos para contribuir con mejor calidad de vida.

Assessment of gait parameters and physical function in patients with advanced cancer participating in a 12-week exercise and nutrition programme: A controlled clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: Gait is a sensitive marker for functional declines commonly seen in patients treated for advanced cancer. We tested the effect of a combined exercise and nutrition programme on gait parameters of advanced-stage cancer patients using a novel wearable gait analysis system. METHODS: Eighty patients were allocated to a control group with nutritional support or to an intervention group additionally receiving whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) training (2×/week). At baseline and after 12 weeks, physical function was assessed by a biosensor-based gait analysis during a six-minute walk test, a 30-s sit-to-stand test, a hand grip strength test, the Karnofsky Index and EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Body composition was measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis and inflammation by blood analysis. RESULTS: Final analysis included 41 patients (56.1% male; 60.0 ± 13.0 years). After 12 weeks, the WB-EMS group showed higher stride length, gait velocity (p < .05), six-minute walking distance (p < .01), bodyweight and skeletal muscle mass, and emotional functioning (p < .05) compared with controls. Correlations between changes in gait and in body composition, physical function and inflammation were detected. CONCLUSION: Whole-body electromyostimulation combined with nutrition may help to improve gait and functional status of cancer patients. Sensor-based mobile gait analysis objectively reflects patients' physical status and could support treatment decisions.

Role and impact of multimodal prehabilitation for gynecologic oncology patients in an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) program.

Patients undergoing major surgery are predisposed to a decrease in functional capacity as a response to surgical stress that can delay post-operative recovery. A prehabilitation program consists of patient preparation strategies before surgery, and include pre-operative measures to improve functional capacity and enhance post-operative recovery. Multimodal prehabilitation may include exercise, nutritional counseling, psychological support, and optimization of underlying medical conditions, as well as cessation of unfavorable health behaviors such as smoking and drinking. Currently, there are no standardized guidelines for prehabilitation, and the existent studies are heterogeneous; however, multimodal approaches are likely to have a greater impact on functional outcomes than single management programs. We have reviewed the literature on prehabilitation in general, and in gynecologic surgery in particular, to identify tools to establish an optimal prehabilitation program within an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol for gynecologic oncology patients. We suggest a safe, reproducible, functional, and easy-to-apply multimodal prehabilitation program for gynecologic oncology practice based on patient-tailored pre-operative medical optimization, physical training, nutritional counseling, and psychological support. The analysis of the prehabilitation program implementation in an ERAS protocol should undergo further research in order to test the efficacy on surgical outcome and recovery after surgery.

A systematic literature review of trials of survivorship interventions for women with gynaecological cancer and their caregivers.

Core components of survivorship care include treatment of late and long-term effects, care coordination, promotion of psychological well-being, health and addressing special populations' needs. Women affected by gynaecological cancer and their caregivers can experience disease-specific issues. This review presents an overview of survivorship interventions that have been trialled among this population. Databases were searched in October/November 2016 to identify eligible studies. Titles, abstracts then full-text were assessed for inclusion by two reviewers until consensus was reached. Data were abstracted using standard tables. Study quality was independently appraised. Twenty-eight articles were included (five reviews; 23 trials). In regards to late and long-term treatment effects, our review found mounting high-level evidence for the effectiveness of psycho-educational programmes to improve physical aspects of sexual function and for exercise interventions for reducing fatigue. We also found emerging evidence for nurse-led follow-up care to improve care coordination and cognitive behavioural therapy to improve psychological wellbeing. There were gaps in the evidence for interventions to effectively address psychosexual issues specific to gynaecological cancer and needs of caregivers. Further research is required to explore strategies to improving psychosexual concerns after gynaecological cancer and the dynamics and supportive care needs of the patient-partner dyad.

Stepped approach to improving sexual function after gynaecological cancer: the SAFFRON feasibility RCT.

BACKGROUND: Women affected by gynaecological cancer are often unaware of the sexual consequences of both the cancer and its treatment. Most do not receive appropriate advice or help to recover sexual function, and the effect on their sexuality may be profound, both physically and emotionally. However, several potential therapies can be effective in helping recover some sexual engagement and change self-perception around sex. A major initial challenge is informing and involving patients in an appropriate and sensitive manner, and a further issue is delivering therapies in busy gynaelogical oncology clinics. This study was conceived in response to a National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) call asking for proposals to improve sexual functioning in women treated for gynaecological cancer while taking into account associated issues of mood. Existing evidence-based therapies for improving sexual function after cancer treatment were adapted and placed within a 'stepped care' model for delivering these in the NHS setting. An assessment and treatment stepping algorithm was developed in parallel, both to assign women to a treatment level at assessment and to follow their progress session by session to advise on changing intervention level. The assessment tool was applied to all participants on the principle that the problem was sexual difficulty, not the cancer of origin. PARTICIPANTS: Women aged > 18 years (with partners at their choice) treated for any gynaecological malignancy with surgery and/or chemotherapy and/or radiation at University College London Hospital or Bristol Gynaecological cancer centres, minimally 3 months post end of treatment, of any sexual orientation, with sexual function difficulties identified by three initial screening questions. DESIGN: A feasibility two-arm, parallel-group randomised controlled pilot trial. SETTING: Two NHS gynaecological cancer centres, one in London and one in Bristol. INTERVENTIONS: A three-level stepped care intervention. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility of conducting a full-scale investigation of stepped therapy and indicate the potential benefits to patients and to the NHS generally. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Recruitment to study, proportion of women stepping up, number of usable data points of all measures and time points over length of trial, and retention of participants to end of trial. RESULTS: Development of the intervention and accompanying algorithm was completed. The study was stopped before the recruitment stage and, hence, no randomisation, recruitment, numbers analysed, outcomes or harms were recorded. LIMITATIONS: As the study did not proceed, the intervention and its accompanying algorithm have not been evaluated in practice, and the capacity of the NHS system to deliver it has not been examined. CONCLUSIONS: None, as the study was halted. FUTURE WORK: The intervention could be studied within a clinical setting; however, the experience of the study group points to the need for psychosocial studies in medical settings to establish pragmatic and innovative mechanisms to ensure adequate resource when extending staff clinical skills and time to deliver any new intervention for the duration of the trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN12010952 and ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02458001. FUNDING: This project was funded by the NIHR HTA programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 23, No. 5. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Women affected by gynaecological cancer are often unaware of the sexual consequences of the cancer and its treatment. Most do not receive appropriate help to recover sexual function, and the physical and mental impact on their sexuality may be profound. However, several therapies could be effective in helping recovery. A major initial challenge is informing and involving patients appropriately and sensitively, and a further challenge is delivering therapies in busy cancer clinics. This study was conceived in response to the funder's call asking for proposals to improve sexual functioning in women treated for gynaecological cancer while taking into account associated issues of mood. Existing evidence-based therapies for improving sexual function after gynaecological cancer treatment were adapted and a new therapy for complex difficulties was devised. Three levels of intervention were developed and placed into a 'stepped care' model: a self-help intervention, a clinical nurse specialist-delivered intervention and a clinical psychologist high-level intervention for problems not responding to levels 1 and 2. In parallel, an assessment and treatment algorithm was developed to assess women and follow their progress closely to inform whether or not their intervention level should be changed. However, major difficulties were encountered: procedural and logistical delays in setting up the study, both at the beginning across a range of hospitals and, later, at the point of training staff within the NHS to deliver the interventions within their clinical workload. Issues such as maternity leave with untrained locum cover led to nursing staff being unable to free up qualified staff to be part of the study. It is hoped that the existing developments can be tested in a future study to determine (1) if they are effective and (2) whether or not they can be delivered within the NHS.

Gynecologic Cancer Survivorship.

Survivorship care includes surveillance and prevention of cancer recurrence, addressing side effects of cancer and cancer treatment and coordination of follow-up care. This article reviews guidelines for surveillance of women with ovarian, endometrial, cervical, and vulvar cancer. It also reviews many of the long-term physical side effects of gynecologic cancer treatment including fatigue, neuropathy, lymphedema, cognitive dysfunction, sexual health concerns, menopausal symptoms, infertility, and economic stressors. Finally, survivorship care plans are reviewed as a tool for coordinating care for women with a history of gynecologic cancer.

Supportive care needs and quality of life in patients with breast and gynecological cancer attending inpatient rehabilitation. A prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Among patients with breast or gynecological cancer, supportive care needs are both highly prevalent and enduring. However, little is known about whether meeting patients' needs is accompanied by increased quality of life (QoL). We aimed to explore patients' supportive care needs reported at the beginning of inpatient rehabilitation and examined whether meeting these needs resulted in improved QoL. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In a multicenter, prospective cohort study with 2 measurement occasions (beginning and end of inpatient rehabilitation), 292 patients with breast and gynecological cancer (mean age 55 years; 71% breast cancer) were enrolled. In 73%, time since diagnosis was longer than 6 months. We obtained self-reports of supportive care needs in 12 domains and measured QoL using the EORTC QLQ-C30 functioning subscales. RESULTS: At the beginning of inpatient rehabilitation, top-ranking severe supportive care needs concerned coordination of care (48%), medical information (45%), alleviation of physical symptoms (42%) and support with improving health behaviors (36%). At the end of inpatient rehabilitation, all needs assessed declined significantly, although many patients still expressed strong needs in some domains. However, meeting patients' needs was accompanied by improvements in all functioning subscales. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to show that meeting breast and gynecological cancer patients' supportive care needs during inpatient rehabilitation resulted in improved QoL. Given the considerable proportions of patients still reporting unmet needs at the end of their stay, stronger and continuing efforts seem warranted to meet these needs and thus further increase QoL.

Self-assessment of Goal Achievements Within a Gynecological Cancer Rehabilitation Counseling.

BACKGROUND: There is an increasing focus on patient involvement in cancer rehabilitation. Goal assessment may improve the patient's self-management of life after cancer. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate whether (1) nurse-led supported goal setting and assessment of goal achievement were feasible in a clinical setting and (2) there was a positive association between women's goal achievement and their self-assessed global health status (GHS). METHODS: Women surgically treated for gynecological cancer were offered rehabilitation counseling consisting of 2 face-to-face sessions and 2 phone calls carried out by a nurse. The Goal Attainment Scale evaluated goal achievement, whereas GHS was assessed with a quality-of-life questionnaire (European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30). RESULTS: One hundred fifty-one women consented to participate; 70% of the women at the first phone call and 72% at the second phone call achieved their goals as "expected" or "more or much more than expected." Endometrial cancer patients more often achieved their goals than ovarian or cervical cancer patients. Approximately 32% of ovarian and 40% of cervical cancer patients scored their goal achievement "below expected." The patients' GHS was not associated with goal attainment measured at each phone call. CONCLUSION: Goal measurement is feasible in cancer rehabilitation, in both goal setting and goal achievement. Goal achievement less than expected levels in women recovering from ovarian or cervical cancer suggests a need for additional support. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This study supports goal setting and goal achievement as a feasible approach to improve cancer rehabilitation and that nursing professionals can facilitate individualized rehabilitation efforts.

The impact of gynaecological cancer treatment on physical activity levels: a systematic review of observational studies.

BACKGROUND: The natural history of physical activity levels during and following gynaecological cancer treatment is not well understood. This is required in order to establish the time at which physical activity levels are lowest in order to target cancer rehabilitation or exercise interventions in gynaecological cancer population accordingly. OBJECTIVES: To conduct a systematic review to evaluate the impact of gynaecological cancer treatments on physical activity levels and to summarise the pattern of changes in physical activity levels over time among patients with gynaecological cancer. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was performed via MEDLINE (1946-2018), CINAHL (1982-2018), EMBASE (1947-2018), Ovid Emcare (1947-2018), PsycINFO (1806-2018) and the Cochrane Library (1991-2018). Studies were eligible for inclusion if they had assessed changes in physical activity levels during and after gynaecological cancer treatment. The methodological quality of the eligible studies was assessed by two independent reviewers using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. RESULTS: In total, six studies (three cohort studies and three cross-sectional studies) with 1607 participants were included. All studies used patient-reported physical activity measures. Two of the three cohort studies measured patient-recalled physical activity levels before diagnosis (baseline), and length of follow-up varied across all studies. The majority of participants were treated surgically±adjuvant therapy. Physical activity levels decreased at 6 months following surgery when compared with pre-treatment levels. Approximately 91% of participants did not meet physical activity guidelines 2 years following diagnosis, and 58% reported being less physically active 3 years after diagnosis, compared with the pre-diagnosis levels. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the paucity of evidence and limitations in the current body of literature, this review demonstrated that compared to pre-diagnosis, levels of physical activity remain low in gynaecological cancer survivors up to 3 years after diagnosis. More research is warranted to better characterise the pattern of change of physical activity levels across the disease trajectory and identify changes in physical activity patterns by cancer treatments and gynaecological tumour streams in order to target interventions accordingly.

Enhanced recovery after surgery in gynecologic oncology.

Enhanced recovery protocols consist of a bundle of concepts including early feeding, opioid-sparing multimodal pain management, and euvolemia, with the overarching goal of hastening postoperative recovery. Enhanced recovery after surgery has been shown to reduce hospital length of stay, reduce costs, and decrease perioperative opioid requirements in benign and oncologic gynecologic surgery. Interventions without supporting evidence of benefit, such as the use of mechanical bowel preparation, routine use of nasogastric tubes and surgical drains, caloric restriction, routine use of intravenous opioid analgesics, and over-vigorous intravenous hydration should be discouraged to improve broader endpoints such as patient satisfaction and overall recovery. Successful implementation requires engagement from a multidisciplinary team including surgeons, anesthesiologists, nurses, and pharmacists.

Combined aerobic and resistance training improves physical capacity in women treated for gynecological cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of 16 weeks combined aerobic and resistance training, twice a week, on the physical performance in women treated for gynecological cancer. METHODS: Sixty women (56.9 ± 13.3 years) who had completed curative treatment for gynecological cancer were divided into two groups: a physical training group (PT) (n = 29) or a control group (C) (n = 31). The PT group performed two sessions of combined aerobic and resistance training weekly for 16 weeks. Peak oxygen consumption (V̇O2peak) and one repetition maximum (1RM) of leg press, leg extension, and chest press were measured before group assignment, after 16 weeks and at the 1-year follow-up. RESULTS: A significant increase in V̇O2peak (ml min-1 kg-1) (29.7 ± 8.0 vs. 31.3 ± 8.3, p = .009), leg press (kg) (113.0 ± 27.3 vs. 116.7 ± 29.2, p = .047), leg extension (kg) (44.2 ± 10.1 vs. 48.0 ± 10.6, p < .001), and chest press (kg) (24.5 ± 7.5 vs. 26.9 ± 8.2, p = .001) was seen in the PT group from pre- to post-measurement. The PT group maintained the improved aerobic condition and muscle strength 1 year after the training intervention. In the C group, there were no significant differences between pre- and post-measurements, but a significant decrease (28.2 ± 7.5 vs. 27.0 ± 7.3, p = .040) in the V̇O2peak from post to 1-year follow-up measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Combined aerobic and resistance training twice a week in 16 weeks improves V̇O2peak and maximal strength in women treated for gynecological cancer. The training effects were sustained after 1 year in the PT group.

Quality of Life in Women After Pelvic Exenteration for Gynecological Malignancies: A Multicentric Study.

OBJECTIVES: This retrospective, multicentric study investigates quality-of-life issues and emotional distress in gynecological cancer survivors submitted to pelvic exenteration (PE). METHODS: The Global Health Status scale of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30; the EORTC QLQ-CX24 (CX24), and EORTC QLQ-OV28 questionnaires were administered at least 12 months from surgery only in women with no evidence of further recurrence after PE. Statistical analysis was performed by the analysis of variance (for repeated measures. RESULTS: Ninety-six subjects affected by gynecological malignancies receiving PE were enrolled in the study. Anterior PE was performed in 47 patients (49%), posterior PE was performed in 29 cases (30.2%), and total PE performed in 20 women (20.8%). In 38 cases (39.6%), a definitive colostomy was performed. Urinary diversion with continent pouch was created in 11 patients. (11.5%), whereas in the remaining cases, a noncontinent pouch was reconstructed. Patients showed a significant discomfort in attitude to disease (71.5 ± 4.7), body image (48.9 ± 6.4), financial difficulties (56.2 ± 5.8), gastrointestinal symptoms (constipation, 47.8 ± 5.1; diarrhea, 62.4 ± 6.6; appetite loss, 43.6 ± 6.7), insomnia (64.5 ± 6.6), Global Health Status (64.6 ± 3.8), physical functioning (65.8 ± 4.6), role functioning (58.8 ± 5.8), and emotional functioning (67.4 ± 4.2). A higher number of ostomies (hazard rate [HR], 7.613; P = 0.012), the creation of a noncontinent bladder (HR, 8.230; P = 0.009), and of definitive colostomy (HR, 8.516; P = 0.008) emerged as independent predictors of poorer Global Health Status scores. Older age (HR, 11.235; P = 0.003), vaginal/vulvar cancer (HR, 7.369; P = 0.013), total/posterior PE (HR, 7.393; P = 0.013), higher number of ostomies (HR, 7.613; P = 0.012), the creation of a noncontinent bladder (HR, 8.230; P = 0.009), and of definitive colostomy (HR, 8.516; P = 0.008) emerged as independent predictors of lower body image levels. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term psycho-oncological support is strongly recommended. The reduction of ostomies seems the most effective way to improve patients' quality of life.

A Pilot Randomized, Controlled Trial of a Wall Climbing Intervention for Gynecologic Cancer Survivors.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To examine the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of an eight-week supervised climbing intervention for gynecologic cancer survivors (GCSs).
. DESIGN: A pilot randomized, controlled trial.
. SETTING: The Wilson Climbing Center in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
. SAMPLE: 35 GCSs who had completed cancer therapy.
. METHODS: GCSs were randomized to an eight-week (16 session) supervised wall climbing intervention (WCI) (n = 24) or usual care (UC) (n = 11).
. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Feasibility outcomes included recruitment rate, adherence rate, skill performance, and safety. Preliminary efficacy outcomes were objective health-related and functional fitness assessed before and after the eight-week intervention using the Senior Fitness Test.
. FINDINGS: Median adherence to the WCI was 13.5 of 16 sessions. Most GCSs were proficient on 16 of 24 skill assessment items. No serious adverse events were reported. Based on intention-to-treat analyses, the WCI group was superior to the UC group for the 6-minute walk, 30-second chair stand, 30-second arm curls, sit and reach, 8-foot up-and-go, grip strength-right, and grip strength-left assessments.
. CONCLUSIONS: The Gynecologic Cancer Survivors Wall Climbing for Total Health (GROWTH) Trial demonstrated that an eight-week supervised WCI was safe, feasible, and improved functional fitness in GCSs. Phase II and III trials are warranted to further establish the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of WCIs in cancer survivors.
. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Oncology nurses may consider a climbing wall as an alternative type of physical activity for improving functional fitness in GCSs.

A nurse-led sexual rehabilitation intervention after radiotherapy for gynecological cancer.

PURPOSE: Although vaginal dilator use after combined pelvic radiation therapy and brachytherapy (RT/BT) is recommended to prevent vaginal shortening and stenosis, women fail to use them and experience sexual problems. A nurse-led sexual rehabilitation intervention targeting sexual recovery and vaginal dilatation was developed. Its feasibility was investigated during a prospective, longitudinal, observational pilot study. METHODS: Four oncology nurses were specifically trained to conduct the intervention. Gynecologic cancer patients treated with RT/BT were assessed using (i) questionnaires on frequency of dilator use (monthly), sexual functioning, and sexual distress (at baseline and 1, 6, and 12 months) and psychological and relational distress (at 1, 6, and 12 months); (ii) semi-structured interviews (between 6 and 12 months); and (iii) consultation recordings (a random selection of 21 % of all consults). RESULTS: Twenty participants were 26-71 years old (mean = 40). Eight participants discontinued participation after 3 to 9 months. At 6 months after RT, 14 out of 16 (88 %), and at 12 months 9 out of 12 (75 %), participants dilated regularly, either by having sexual intercourse or by using dilators. Sexual functioning improved between 1 and 6 months after RT, with further improvement at 12 months. Most participants reported that the intervention was helpful and the nurses reported having sufficient expertise and counseling skills. CONCLUSIONS: According to the pilot results, the intervention was feasible and promising for sexual rehabilitation and regular dilator use after RT. Its (cost-)effectiveness will be investigated in a randomized controlled trial.

Storytelling as part of cancer rehabilitation to support cancer patients and their relatives.

Previous research on psychosocial support for cancer-related concerns has primarily focused on either patients or their relatives, although limited research is available on how patients and their relatives can be supported together. The aim of this article is to explore the use of storytelling as a part of a residential cancer rehabilitation intervention for patients together with their relatives, with a specific focus on their management of cancer-related concerns. Ten pairs participated in the intervention and data were generated through ethnographic fieldwork, including participant observations, informal conversations and follow-up interviews conducted one month after completing the intervention. Analysis was performed drawing on narrative theory combined with social practice theory. The results demonstrate that the use of storytelling and metaphors intertwined with other course activities, such as dancing and arts & crafts, provided the patients and their relatives with strategies to manage cancer-related concerns, which they were later able to apply in their everyday lives. The study results may be useful to other professionals in clinical practice for rehabilitation purposes for addressing issues of fear and worry.

Exercise interventions for patients with gynaecological cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: People with gynaecological cancer commonly suffer from physical and psychological symptoms related to their cancer and cancer treatment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and synthesise the evidence examining the effect of interventions with an exercise component for females with gynaecological cancer. DATA SOURCES: Medline, CINAHL, EMBASE, PubMed, PEDro, PsycINFO and Cochrane Library were searched systematically in September 2014. STUDY SELECTION: Randomised controlled trials were included if they investigated the effects of interventions with an exercise component in patients with gynaecological cancer. STUDY APPRAISAL: Two reviewers independently assessed the risk of bias of studies using the PEDro scale. RESULTS: Seven randomised controlled trials on five patient groups involving 221 participants were included. The mean PEDro score was 5.3 (standard deviation 1.5) out of 10. Compared with control groups, the intervention groups showed significantly greater improvements in physical activity levels and body mass index. No significant effects were found for fatigue, depression and health-related quality of life. A meta-analysis of functional exercise capacity and muscle strength was not possible due to insufficient data in the included trials. LIMITATIONS: The majority of studies provided exercise as part of multicomponent intervention programmes. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions with an exercise component appear to be effective at improving physical activity levels and body mass index among patients with gynaecological cancer. Further research is required to examine the effects of exercise interventions alone in this population. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42014014019.

[BALANCED MULTIMODAL ANALGESIA IN GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY].

UNLABELLED: This article is about the issues of anesthesia during radical surgery in gynecologic oncology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: the study included 336 patients who underwent simple and extended hysterectomy for the period from 2014 to 2015. There were 3 groups where PCA was carried out in groups I and III. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: found a significant difference between the groups in pain intensity before and after surgery, as well as the need for opioid analgesics in the surgical treatment stages. Also is reflected the comparative characteristic of analgesia during the operation with epidural analgesia and systemic analgesia. CONCLUSIONS: the study proves the effectiveness ofpatient-controlledepidural analgesia by calculating the sum ofpain intensity profile on the visual analogue scale in the postoperative period to 72 hours. It confirmed the needfor systemic analgesia in conjunction with epidural block in extensive gynecological cancer operations.

A new paradigm for examining the correlates of aerobic, strength, and combined exercise: an application to gynecologic cancer survivors.

PURPOSE: Almost all exercise guidelines recommend both aerobic and strength exercise, however, few studies have simultaneously examined the correlates of meeting both exercise guidelines. Here, we propose a new paradigm that calls on researchers to examine not only the correlates of meeting the various exercise guidelines versus no guideline but also the correlates of meeting the combined guidelines versus one guideline and meeting one guideline versus the other guideline. METHODS: A random sample of 621 gynecologic cancer survivors located in Alberta, Canada, completed a mailed questionnaire. RESULTS: A multivariate multinomial logistic regression analysis indicated that (a) meeting only the aerobic exercise guideline compared to neither guideline was associated with younger age, social drinking, healthy weight, better general health, and no comorbidities; (b) meeting only the strength exercise guideline compared to neither guideline was associated with social drinking and being healthy weight; (c) meeting the combined exercise guideline compared to neither guideline was associated with social drinking, being healthy weight, and better general health; (d) meeting the aerobic guideline only compared to the strength guideline only was associated with younger age and better general health; and (e) few correlates distinguished between meeting the combined guidelines compared to a single guideline. CONCLUSIONS: Demographic and health variables are associated with meeting the various exercise guidelines versus no guideline but they are not associated with meeting the combined exercise guidelines versus a single guideline or meeting one guideline versus the other guideline. Application of this new paradigm to cancer survivors is encouraged.