Childhood cancer hospital resource utilization and costs in Egypt, 2013-2017; patterns, trends, and associated factors for 8886 patients from Children's Cancer Hospital, Egypt.

INTRODUCTION: There is a lack ofevidence about resource use and costs of childhood cancer care in Egypt. Knowledge about resource use/costs can help in better resource planning to improve care and outcomes efficiently. In this study, we estimated patterns and trends of hospital resource use and costs for children with cancer (n = 8886, aged 0-18 years) treated at Children's Cancer Hospital, Egypt (CCHE), between 2013 and 2017, by ICCC-3 groups, at one and three years post-diagnosis. METHODS: We estimated costs from the healthcare provider perspective, expressed in USD 2019. We also studied resource use/cost trends, and factors associated with inpatient days and costs. RESULTS: For all cancers combined, median costs were $14,774 (IQR: $6,559-$23,738) at one year and $19,799 (IQR: $8,921-$34,204) at three years post-diagnosis. Median inpatient days were 38 days (IQR: 17-60) at one year, and 43 days (IQR: 20-74) at three years post-diagnosis. Patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and neuroblastoma imposed the greatest financial burden on CCHE, representing 53.1% of total costs. AML patients had the highest costs/resource use of all childhood cancers. Cost trends decreased by 2.9% (P < 0.001) for all cancers combined, due to economic instability in Egypt between 2013 and 2017. The use of IV supportive drugs increased by 24.3% (P < 0.001) over time for children with solid tumors. CONCLUSION: These findings will inform hospital resource planning and budgeting to promote value in care delivery, with implications for pediatric oncology practice and policy in Egypt/CCHE. Estimated costs provide the foundation for cost-effectiveness analysis.

Poverty and Targeted Immunotherapy: Survival in Children's Oncology Group Clinical Trials for High-Risk Neuroblastoma.

BACKGROUND: Whether social determinants of health are associated with survival in the context of pediatric oncology-targeted immunotherapy trials is not known. We examined the association between poverty and event-free survival (EFS) and overall survival (OS) for children with high-risk neuroblastoma treated in targeted immunotherapy trials. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 371 children with high-risk neuroblastoma treated with GD2-targeted immunotherapy in the Children's Oncology Group trial ANBL0032 or ANBL0931 at a Pediatric Health Information System center from 2005 to 2014. Neighborhood poverty exposure was characterized a priori as living in a zip code with a median household income within the lowest quartile for the cohort. Household poverty exposure was characterized a priori as sole coverage by public insurance. Post hoc analyses examined the joint effect of neighborhood and household poverty using a common reference. All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS: In multivariable Cox regressions adjusted for disease and treatment factors, household poverty-exposed children experienced statistically significantly inferior EFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.28 to 2.82, P = .001) and OS (HR = 2.79, 95% CI = 1.63 to 4.79, P < .001) compared with unexposed children. Neighborhood poverty was not independently associated with EFS or OS. In post hoc analyses exploring the joint effect of neighborhood and household poverty, children with dual-poverty exposure (neighborhood poverty and household poverty) experienced statistically significantly inferior EFS (HR = 2.21, 95% CI = 1.48 to 3.30, P < .001) and OS (HR = 3.70, 95% CI = 2.08 to 6.59, P < .001) compared with the unexposed group. CONCLUSIONS: Poverty is independently associated with increased risk of relapse and death among neuroblastoma patients treated with targeted immunotherapy. Incorporation of social and environmental factors in future trials as health-care delivery intervention targets may increase the benefit of targeted therapies.

Analysis of treatment cost for neuroblastoma to the family: a single-center cross-sectional study in China.

BACKGROUND: Neuroblastoma (NB) is notorious in childhood cancer because of its high incidence and poor prognosis. The Children's Oncology Group reported that the 3-year OS in the high-risk (HR) group is 50%, and the HR-NB with bone marrow metastasis in our center is 43.1%. Thousands of families in China suffer from the cost of NB, but the true costs of therapy are unknown; to date, no study has ever performed a detailed therapy costs analysis for NB. The objective of this study was to assess the economic burden of NB treatment in children to the family, to ultimately reduce related expenses for patients and promote the establishment of NB management policy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data in this cross-sectional study were collected via questionnaires completed by parents at the outpatient clinic and was verified via a computer system. Therapy costs of children with NB of differing risks were analyzed through descriptive statistics (1 CNY ≈ 0.1412 USD). RESULTS: Median direct medical costs of low risk (LR), middle risk (MR), and HR NB during treatment were 180.0 (120.0, 300.0), 200.0 (166.0, 300.0), and 650.0 (415.5, 850.0) thousand Chinese yuan (CNY), respectively. Direct non-medical costs including transportation, food, and accommodation were 60.0 (37.0, 100.0), 80.0 (60.0, 120.0), and 100.0 (80.0, 157.5) thousand CNY in the LR, MR, and HR groups, respectively. Additionally, parents accrued work absences to attend treatment, and lost a total of 100.0 (50.0, 150.0) thousand CNY in indirect costs. LIMITATIONS: Families whose children had relapsed or died were excluded from this analysis and therefore limited the conclusions drawn. Parents were asked to recall costs since initial diagnosis (1-6 years in the past), but this extended time period may have introduced recall bias. CONCLUSIONS: Direct non-medical and indirect costs play an important role in the total treatment costs of NB. Children with NB treated in local hospitals and followed up in hospital specialized in childhood oncology may save many unnecessary expenses. China's healthcare system should establish mechanisms and provide financial support for children with NB.

Autologous stem cell transplant for high-risk neuroblastoma: Achieving cure with low-cost adaptations.

BACKGROUND: The majority of patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC) are unable to receive optimal therapy, including autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) for high-risk neuroblastoma. Management is intensive and multidisciplinary; survival is often poor. We report a single-center outcome of high-risk neuroblastoma, with adaptations optimized for LMIC. PROCEDURE: The study was retrospective. Patients were treated on the backbone of the high-risk neuroblastoma study-1 of SIOP-Europe (HR-NBL1/SIOPEN) protocol with ASCT. Adaptations incorporated to decrease cost, requirement for inpatient admission, infections, and faster engraftment included (a) optional outpatient administration for rapid-COJEC, (b) two sessions of stem-cell apheresis, (c) storing stem cells at 2-6°C without cryopreservation for up to 7 days, (d) no central lines, (e) no antibacterial/antifungal/antiviral prophylaxis, (f) omitting formal assessment of cardiac/renal/pulmonary functions before ASCT, and (g) administration of pegylated granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on Day +4. RESULTS: Over 5 years 9 months, 35 patients with high-risk neuroblastoma were treated. Rapid-COJEC was administered over a median duration of 80 days (interquartile range: 77, 83). Conditioning regimen included melphalan (n = 7), oral busulfan-melphalan (Bu/Mel; n = 6), or intravenous Bu/Mel (n = 22). The median viability of stem cells stored for 6 days (n = 28) was 93% (range: 88-99). Two (5.7%) patients had ASCT-related mortality. The 3-year overall and event-free survival was 41% and 39%, respectively. A relapse occurred in 20 (57%) patients. Treatment abandonment was observed in one (3%) patient. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of therapy in a disciplined time frame along with low-cost adaptations enables to manage high-risk neuroblastoma with low abandonment and an encouraging survival in LMIC. Stem cells can be stored safely without cryopreservation for up to 7 days.

Dinutuximab Beta for Treating Neuroblastoma: An Evidence Review Group and Decision Support Unit Perspective of a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.

As part of its Single Technology Appraisal (STA) process, the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) invited the manufacturer (EUSA Pharma) of dinutuximab beta (Qarziba®) to submit evidence of its clinical and cost effectiveness for treating neuroblastoma. The BMJ Technology Assessment Group (BMJ-TAG) was commissioned to act as the Evidence Review Group (ERG), reviewing the submission from the company. The Decision Support Unit (DSU) was commissioned to review additional evidence submitted by the company and to undertake further analyses. This article presents the critical review of the company's submissions by the ERG and DSU, further analyses undertaken by the DSU, and the outcome of the NICE guidance. The clinical effectiveness for dinutuximab beta was derived from a phase III randomised controlled trial (RCT) that assessed the safety and efficacy of the addition of interleukin (IL)-2 to dinutuximab beta plus isotretinoin. This trial did not inform the relative effectiveness of dinutuximab beta versus isotretinoin alone, which was established practice in the UK for maintenance treatment. In the absence of direct evidence, the company initially conducted a naïve indirect treatment comparison against a historical control, and later performed a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) against the isotretinoin arm of an RCT comparing dinutuximab alpha and isotretinoin. The company submitted a partitioned survival analysis model that calculated the incremental cost effectiveness of dinutuximab beta versus isotretinoin. The company's original incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was £22,338 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. However, the ERG were concerned that the company's ICER was not suitable for decision making, and thus carried out initial exploratory analysis as a first step to overcome the naïve estimation of treatment effectiveness in the model. The ERG's analysis estimated an ICER of £111,858 per QALY gained. In their revised analysis incorporating the MAIC and other changes as requested by the appraisal committee, the company's ICER was £24,661 per QALY gained. When the DSU incorporated longer-term isotretinoin data and made corrections to the model, the ICER increased to between £62,886 and £87,164 per QALY gained depending on the choice of survival model. A confidential Patient Access Scheme (PAS) decreased the ICERs. The ICERs with the PAS were over £40,000 per QALY gained, but the NICE committee additionally considered the patient population and its size, the disease severity, the potential for significant survival benefit and uncaptured health benefits, and recommended dinutuximab beta as a treatment option, subject to the company providing the agreed discount in the PAS.

Immunotherapy for neuroblastoma: turning promise into reality.

Neuroblastoma is one of the commonest and most aggressive paediatric malignancies. The majority of children present with metastatic disease for which long-term survival remains poor despite intensive multi-modal therapies. Toxicity from current treatment regimes is already significant, and there is little room to further intensify therapy. Alternative treatment strategies are therefore needed in order to improve survival. Immunotherapy is an attractive therapeutic option for these children as it potentially offers a much more specific and less toxic treatment than conventional therapies. This review discusses the different immunotherapy strategies that may be useful in neuroblastoma, their advantages and disadvantages and the challenges that need to be overcome to successfully use them clinically.

Health and economic benefits of well-designed evaluations: some lessons from evaluating neuroblastoma screening.

BACKGROUND: Well-designed evaluations of health services are frequently made today. However, the extent of the evaluations' benefits and costs is not well documented, creating uncertainty whether their use is optimal from society's perspective. We examined these costs and benefits using data from one well-designed evaluation, the Quebec Neuroblastoma Screening Project (QNSP). It screened most Quebec newborns between 1989 and 1994 for neuroblastoma. As previously reported, the screening did not reduce neuroblastoma mortality and caused adverse health effects. METHODS: We compared the cost of doing the QNSP with its benefits. Had the QNSP not been undertaken, neuroblastoma screening would have been implemented throughout North America. We assume that screening would have started in 1989 and ended in 2002. The QNSP's benefits include the health costs and adverse health effects averted by not using ineffective screening during those 14 years. In our calculations we used neuroblastoma incidence data for the QNSP and for Ontario where there was no screening, detailed data describing the health services used by the patients, and Quebec cost data for those services. RESULTS: The QNSP cost 8.77 million dollars (2002 US dollars). By not implementing similar screening programs between 1989 and 2002, the United States and Canada avoided 574.1 million dollars in health costs, the unnecessary treatment of 9223 children, and false-positive findings for 5003 children screened. CONCLUSIONS: The health care costs and adverse health effects averted by the QNSP justify its costs. These results show that well-designed evaluations can yield--at least sometimes--benefits substantially greater than their high costs. This raises an important policy issue: are these evaluations now being under- or over used?

Autologous peripheral blood progenitor-cell transplantation versus autologous bone marrow transplantation for adults and children with non-leukaemic malignant disease. A randomised economic study.

A prospective economic analysis of autologous peripheral blood progenitor-cell transplantation (PBPCT) versus autologous bone marrow transplantation (BMT) was performed as part of a randomised clinical trial in 129 patient (adults and children) receiving high-dosage antineoplastic therapy for non-leukaemic malignant disease. The clinical assessment criteria of the study were the duration of thrombocytopenia (< 30 x 10(9)/L and < 50 x 10(9)/L) and of granulocytopenia (< 0.5 x 10(9)/L). The cost of medical resources used was the primary economic end-point. We also calculated the cost of reaching 2 specified haematological end-points: platelet recovery (> or = 30 x 10(9)/L) and granulocyte recovery (> or = 0.5 x 10(9)/L). Economic analysis was based on the French hospital perspective. Haematological recovery was significantly quicker in the PBPCT groups (adults and children) compared with the BMT groups. Economic study revealed that the PBPCT groups were clearly less expensive with regard to costs up to discharge (17% decrease of the average cost for adults and 29% for children) and those associated with specified haematological end-points. The global costs of PBPCT were lower than those of BMT for these adult and paediatric populations. Economic arguments can clearly be added to clinical ones in favour of substitution of autologous PBPCT for autologous BMT. International comparisons of diffusion of PBPCT could be of great interest for further economic research into medical innovation.

Cost analysis of immunomagnetic marrow purging for neuroblastoma: in-house purging versus submission to purging centers.

High-dose chemoradiotherapy in conjunction with autologous bone marrow transplantation has been used in the treatment of advanced stage neuroblastoma. Because of frequent marrow involvement, marrow purging methods, such as the immunomagnetic technique, have been developed. Current cost constraints force institutions to consider in-house purging versus submission of marrow to purging centers. Our analysis demonstrates that 15 procedures per year are needed to justify an up-front investment in equipment and supplies with a break-even period of 5 years. This number is also required to keep technical proficiency current without frequent retraining of personnel. The analysis includes start-up costs for institutions without a bone marrow processing laboratory, as well as for institutions already processing marrow or peripheral blood stem cells. For institutions performing fewer procedures per year, submission of marrow to purging centers is more cost effective than in-housing purging.

Mass screening for neuroblastoma and estimation of costs.

On the basis of epidemiological data and medical costs for patients with neuroblastoma, we have calculated the cost of mass screening for neuroblastoma with high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) compared to the cost when it is not performed. If the sensitivity of the mass screening is 80% and 22,000 infants are screened annually the cost will be 27,809,000 yen ($191,800). If mass is not performed, the cost will be 28,446,000 yen ($196,200). The difference in cost (637,000 yen or $4,400) is fairly small. If the sensitivity is 75% and 16,500 infants are screened, the difference is also small (174,000 yen or $1,200). Therefore, mass screening with the HPLC method will not be an undue financial burden. But re-screening at an older age will be done with less financially favorable results, considering that the sensitivity may not be as high as that of the first screening and that mothers are somewhat reluctant about re-screening. The balance of the cost of mass screening by qualitative methods may also be less favorable, since the detection rate is low.

Childhood cancer. Medical costs.

The financial burden of cancer treatment is a major source of stress for families of children with cancer. A previous study demonstrated that out of pocket nonmedical costs incurred because of the illness were consuming 26% of the weekly budget. A one-month sampling of medical charges were collected for 64 families of children undergoing outpatient treatment of cancer. Families of ten patients who had died also participated; total cancer center medical charges throughout the illness were collected. Monthly charges for living patients varied greatly with diagnosis, ranging from $100 to $1800. Total cancer center charges throughout the illness for the decreased patients ranged from $8000 to $53,000 (mean, +34,558). More than 50% of the charges were incurred in the diagnostic and terminal stages of illness. One sign of the hardship endured by the families was the outstanding debts to the cancer center long after the patient's death. Medical costs constituted an average of 5.8% of the families' weekly budgets. Overall, medical costs to the family were found to be much less than the nonmedical costs incurred during treatment.