Pigtail with self-retaining bicanalicular intubation combined with Mitomycin C for the treatment of acquired lower punctal stenosis.

BACKGROUND: The pigtail was used to create an opening at the lower punctal site in grade 0 stenosis with insertion of self-retaining tube and Mitomycin C (MMC). METHODS: The patients with acquired lower punctal stenosis (grade 0) were divided randomly into equal groups, Group A: were treated with pigtail and MMC 0.02% and Group B: were treated with pigtail alone. The pigtail was inserted through the upper punctum until its tip reached the occluded punctum, this site was incised with a scalpel (No. 11). A self-retaining bicanalicular tube was then placed. RESULTS: Results of 36 eyes from 26 patients were included. No differences were observed between both groups regarding epiphora score, FDD test and punctal size preoperatively. The postoperative epiphora score, there were significant differences at 1 month (P = 0.035), 3 months (P = 0.005), and 6 months after removal (P < 0.001). The FDD test, there were significant differences at 6 months (P = 0.045), 1 month (P = 0.021), 3 months (P = 0.012), and 6 months post tube removal (P = 0.005). The punctal size, both groups differed at 1 month (P = 0.045), 3 months (P = 0.03), and 6 months post tube removal (P = 0.005). Only one case (5.5%) at each group showed extrusion of the tube. CONCLUSION: The pigtail probe, bicanalicular stent and MMC can be an effective method in treatment of severe punctal stenosis.

[Dacryocystorhinostomy with a counteropening in the treatment of secondary nasolacrimal duct obstruction after radioiodine therapy]. / Dakriotsistorinostomiya s nalozheniem kontrapertury pri vtorichnoi obliteratsii slezootvodyashchikh putei vsledstvie terapii radioaktivnym iodom.

Among secondary forms of nasolacrimal duct obstruction caused by radioactive iodine therapy, its distal forms localized in the area of the Hasner's valve are predominant. In this regard, during dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) there is a high probability of developing the sump syndrome, for which the anatomical prerequisite is that the lower edge of the DCR ostium is above the level of obstruction. In such cases, we propose to supplement DCR with a counteropening in the area of the Hasner's valve. PURPOSE: This study analyzes the clinical effectiveness of dacryocystorinostomy with a counteropening. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The outcomes of 49 surgeries (49 patients) with secondary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction due to radioactive iodine therapy were analyzed, including 34 DCR and 15 DCR with a counteropening. The clinical outcomes were analyzed over the longest possible period after surgery. The analysis included the severity of tearing on the Munk scale, the characteristic of the formed ostium on the M. Ali scale and the height of the tear meniscus. Differences were considered significant at a confidence level of 95% (p≤0.05). RESULTS: Analysis of the results of the performed surgeries showed that DCR was clinically effective in 30 (88%) cases, DCR with a counteropening - in 15 (100%) cases. The differences were not statistically significant in the total sample, but were statistically significant when comparing the results of surgeries in patients with distal obliteration. CONCLUSION: The developed and clinically tested method of DCR with a counteropening in the area of the Hasner's valve was completely effective in 15 patients with secondary nasolacrimal duct obstruction caused by radioiodine therapy.

[Pharmacological prevention of fibrosis in dacryosurgery]. / Medikamentoznaya profilaktika fibrotizatsii v dakriokhirurgii.

Chronic inflammatory process in the lacrimal drainage system is the main etiological factor leading to dacryostenosis and consequent obliteration - partial and total nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Prevention of this process is an urgent problem in dacryology. Currently, there is very little research on the development and use of conservative methods for treating dacryostenosis using anti-inflammatory, as well as anti-fibrotic drugs. In this regard, the main method of treating lacrimal drainage obstruction is dacryocystorhinostomy. However, the problem of recurrence after this operation has not been resolved. The causes of recurrence can be cicatricial healing of dacryocystorhinostomy ostium, canalicular obstruction, formation of granulations and synechiae in its area. Surgical methods of recurrence prevention are associated with possible complications, and there is conflicting data on the feasibility of their use. Based on this, the development of pharmacological methods for the prevention of fibrosis in dacryology is promising, among which the antitumor antibiotic Mitomycin C is the most studied. However, there are no specific scientifically substantiated recommendations for the use of this drug, and the data on its effectiveness vary. This has prompted researchers to look for and study alternative anti-fibrotic agents, such as antitumor drugs, glucocorticoids, hyaluronic acid, small molecule, biological, immunological and genetically engineered drugs, as well as nanoparticles. This review presents the current data on the efficacy and prospects of the use of these drugs in dacryology.

Comparative study of surgical outcomes regarding tear meniscus area and high-order aberrations between two different interventional methods for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

PURPOSE: To compare endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy (EN-DCR) with sheath-guided dacryoendoscopic probing and bicanalicular intubation (SG-BCI) by evaluating tear meniscus area (TMA) and total high-order aberrations (HOAs) for primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO). METHOD: We retrospectively reviewed 56 eyes of 42 patients (7 men, 35 women; age, 72.7±13.1 years) who underwent EN-DCR or SG-BCI for PANDO in Toyama University Hospital from February 2020 to June 2022. In the EN-DCR and SG-BCI groups, we measured the patency of the lacrimal passage, preoperative and postoperative TMA, and HOAs of the central 4 mm of the cornea using optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT), six months postoperatively. RESULTS: There was a positive correlation between preoperative TMA and preoperative HOAs in all cases. Postoperative patency of lacrimal passage was 100% in the EN-DCR and 80.8% in the SG-BCI group. There was a significant difference in the number of passages between the two groups (p = 0.01). Preoperative TMA and HOAs showed a significant postoperative decrease in both groups (EN-DCR group: p<0.01, p<0.01, SG-BCI group: p<0.01, p=0.03, respectively). We then calculated the rate of change of preoperative and postoperative TMA and HOAs and compared them between the two groups. The rate of change was significantly higher in the EN-DCR group than that in the SG-BCI group (TMA, p=0.03; HOAs, p=0.02). CONCLUSION: Although both EN-DCR and SG-BCI are effective for PANDO, our results suggest that EN-DCR is more effective in improving TMA and HOAs.

Probing versus primary nasal endoscopy for the treatment of congenital dacryocystoceles.

PURPOSE: To compare outcomes and complications of three surgical techniques for the treatment of congenital dacryocystoceles: nasolacrimal probing and irrigation (P+I), P+I plus nasal endoscopy (NE) with intranasal cyst marsupialization, and primary NE with intranasal cyst marsupialization. METHODS: The medical records of children ≤2 years of age at a single academic center with a diagnosis of dacryocystocele from 2012 to 2022 were retrospectively identified and reviewed. The primary outcome was resolution of the dacryocystocele (ie, elimination of the medial canthal mass and resolution of tearing or discharge) after a single procedure ("primary success"). Surgical techniques were compared using exact logistic regression. RESULTS: Of 54 patients, 21 (39%) underwent P+I, 23 (43%) underwent P+I plus nasal endoscopy, and 10 (18%) underwent primary NE. Primary success was 76% for P+I and 100% for the other two cohorts. Most patients (89%) who underwent P+I received general anesthesia compared with none who underwent primary nasal endoscopy. Most complications were related to the use of general anesthesia, with a complication rate of 10% for P+I, 48% for P+I plus NE, and 0% for primary NE. Most P+I procedures required hospital admission compared to half of primary NE procedures. CONCLUSIONS: In our study cohort, primary NE provided good outcomes and was associated with a lower complication rate than P+I with or without NE.

An effective approach for the treatment of severe punctal stenosis: Bicanalicular silicone tube intubation with pigtail probe.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of using a pigtail probe to open the inferior punctum followed by bicanalicular silicone tube intubation in patients with severe acquired punctal stenosis. METHODS: Forty-one eyes of 25 patients with severe inferior punctal stenosis admitted to our tertiary care center were included in the study. The degree of epiphora was determined using the Munk score and the fluorescein disappearance test. The inferior punctum was located and opened by entering the superior punctum with a pigtail probe. Then, bicanalicular silicone tube intubation was performed. The silicone tube was removed after six months. A Munk score of 0 or 1 and a fluorescein disappearance test score of 1 and 2 were considered a complete success. RESULTS: Ten (40%) patients were male, and 15 (60%) were female. The mean age was 60.4±15.5years. One year after the surgery, epiphora was absent in 18 eyes (43.9%) (Munk score grade 0) and rarely seen in 9 eyes (22%) (Munk score grade 1). At the one-year follow-up, the fluorescein disappearance test score was stage 1 (<3min) in 21 eyes (51.2%) and stage 2 (3-5min) in 13 eyes (31.7%). There was a statistically significant difference between the preoperative and one-year postoperative test results (P<0.001). CONCLUSION: In cases with severe punctal stenosis, a pigtail probe is an effective method for locating and opening the punctum, and punctal opening and prevention of restenosis were achieved by a bicanalicular stent.

Primary Lacrimal Sac Tumors with Extension into Vicinity: Outcomes with Endoscopy-Assisted Modified Weber-Ferguson's Approach.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of endoscopy-assisted modified Weber-Ferguson's approach in the management of primary lacrimal sac tumors with extension into the neighboring tissues. METHODS: A retrospective interventional study was performed on all patients with lacrimal sac tumors treated with the endoscopy-assisted modified Weber-Ferguson approach between January 2010 and June 2022 at the Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, China. Data assessed include demographics, clinical presentations, imaging features, surgical techniques, histopathology, adjuvant modalities of management, complications, and outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 13 patients were included in the analysis. Epiphora and palpable mass lesion were the presenting complaint in 84.6% (11/13) of the patients. Nearly half of the patients (46.1%, 6/13) were misdiagnosed as lacrimal duct obstruction. All the lacrimal sac tumors in the present series showed uneven enhancement on T1-weighted MRI imaging. Postoperatively, 84.6% (11/13) patients recovered well with excellent esthetics and were disease-free after a mean follow-up of 58.6 months. Two patients who underwent additional exenteration developed recurrence and succumbed (at 41 and 96 months follow up) while they were on palliative chemoradiation. CONCLUSION: The endoscopic-assisted modified Weber-Fergusson surgical approach is effective in providing better visibility and accessibility to lacrimal sac tumors with extension into neighboring tissue.

Anisometropia and Amblyopia Outcomes in Early Versus Late Resolution of Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction in Older Infants.

PURPOSE: Congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction is a known risk factor for amblyopia and anisometropia. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the rate of anisometropia and amblyopia development differed based on the age at CNLDO resolution in older infants. METHODS: This retrospective chart review at a single tertiary children's hospital from 2007 to 2017 compared early versus late spontaneous resolution (cutoff 12 months) and intervention (cutoff 15 months) groups presenting at ≥9 months of age, comparing visual outcomes, including anisometropia (≥1 D of sphere or cylinder) and amblyopia (≥2 levels difference in Teller acuity or optotype testing). Parents/guardians were contacted by phone for missing data on spontaneous resolution or intervention status. RESULTS: A total of 462 patients were included (152 early; 310 late group). The early group presented at a median age of 12.0 (interquartile range: 10.0, 13.0) months, while the late group presented at 21.0 (interquartile range: 15.0, 32.0) months. Unilateral disease occurred in 62% and 59%, respectively. Anisometropia was seen in (12/102) 12% of early versus (25/243) 10% of late patients (p = 0.686, 95% CI: -0.059, 0.088), and amblyopia in (4/131) 3% of early versus (14/286) 5% of late patients (p = 0.322, 95% CI: -0.061, 0.018). In patients presenting <24 months without undergoing surgery, spontaneous resolution occurred in 76% between 12 and 24 months (n = 41). CONCLUSIONS: Anisometropia and amblyopia rates did not significantly differ between early and delayed intervention for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction in this retrospective cohort presenting beyond 9 months of age to a children's hospital. This study found frequent late spontaneous resolution.

Practice patterns in revision dacryocystorhinostomy.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to report the practice patterns while performing revision dacryocystorhinostomy (RevDCR) amongst oculoplastic surgeons from several regions across the globe. METHODS: The survey consisted of 41 specific questions sent via email that contained a link to the Google forms. The questions covered several aspects of the respondents' practice profiles, evaluation methods, pre-operative choices, surgical techniques, and follow-up preferences while dealing with patients of prior failed DCRs. Questions were answerable either as multiple choice or free text typing. The survey respondents were anonymized. The responses were collected and analyzed, and data were tabulated to understand the preferred practice trends. RESULTS: A total of 137 surgeons completed the survey. Most respondents identified themselves as experienced surgeons managing failed DCRs (76.6%, total respondents (n) = 137). The commonly preferred modalities for evaluation of a failed DCR were lacrimal irrigation (91.2%) and nasal endoscopy (66.9%). About 64% (87/137) of the respondents performed a combination of nasal endoscopy, lacrimal irrigation, and probing to localize the area of the failed DCR. A majority of the respondents used anti-metabolites (73.3%, n = 131) and stents (96.4%, 132/137) during the revision surgery. Most surgeons preferred endoscopic approach (44.5%), (61/137) for revising a failed DCR and most preferred general anaesthesia with local infiltration (70.1%, 96/137). Aggressive fibrosis with cicatricial closure was identified as the most frequently encountered cause of failure (84.6%, 115/137). The osteotomy was performed on an as-needed basis by 59.1% (81/137) of the surgeons. Only 10.9% of the respondents used navigation guidance while performing a revision DCR, mainly for post-trauma scenarios. Most of the surgeons completed the revision procedure within 30-60 minutes (77.4%, 106/137). The self-reported outcomes of revision DCRs were good (80-95%, median-90%, n = 137). CONCLUSION: A significantly high percentage of oculoplastic surgeons who responded to this survey from across the globe performed nasal endoscopy in their pre-operative evaluations, preferred endoscopic surgical approach, and used antimetabolites and stents while performing revision DCRs.

Post-traumatic canalicular fistula: description and review of literature - SALDO update study (SUP) - paper II.

PURPOSE: To discuss the clinical spectrum and management strategies in patients with post-traumatic canalicular fistula (PTCF). METHODS: Retrospective, interventional case series of consecutive patients diagnosed with PTCF over a 6-year study period between June 2016 and June 2022. The demographics, mode of injury, location, and communication of the canalicular fistula were noted. The outcomes of several management modalities including dacryocystorhinostomy, lacrimal gland therapies, and conservative approaches were assessed. RESULTS: Eleven cases with PTCF over the study period were included. The mean age at presentation was 23.5 years (range: 6-71 years), with male: female ratio of 8:3. The median time interval between trauma to presentation at the Dacryology clinic was 3 years (range: 1 week to 12 years). Seven had iatrogenic trauma and four had the canalicular fistula following primary trauma. Management modalities pursued include conservative approach for minimal symptoms, and dacryocystorhinostomy, dacryocystectomy, and lacrimal gland botulinum toxin injection. The mean follow-up period was 30 months (range: 3-months-6 years). CONCLUSION: PTCF is a complex lacrimal condition and the management of the PTCF needs a tailored approach guided by its nature and location and patient symptomatology.

DCR preferences among oculoplastic surgeons: Barriers and facilitators to adoption of endoscopic DCR.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the preference for dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR), patient selection criteria for endoscopic DCR, endoscopic DCR technique, and barriers to adoption of endoscopic DCR. METHOD: Cross-sectional study conducted from May-December 2021. A survey was sent to oculoplastic surgeons. Questions on demographic characteristics, type of clinical practice, technique preferences, barriers and facilitators to adoption of endoscopic DCR were included. RESULTS: 245 participants completed the survey. Most respondents were located at an urban site (84%), were in private practice (66%), and had been in practice for more than 10 years (58.9%). Sixty one percent perform external DCR as the first line procedure for treating primary nasolacrimal duct obstruction. The most common factor influencing the surgeon's decision to perform endoscopic DCR was the patient's request (37%) followed by endonasal exam (32%). The most common barrier for not performing endoscopic DCR was the lack of experience and lack of training during fellowship (42%). The most worrisome complication for most respondents was failure of the procedure (48%), followed by bleeding (30.3%). Eighty one percent believe surgical mentorship and supervision during initial cases would facilitate endoscopic DCR learning. CONCLUSIONS: External Dacryocystorhinostomy is the preferred technique for treating primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Learning endoscopic DCR early during fellowship training and high surgical volume to improve the learning curve dramatically impacts the adoption of the procedure.

Lacrimal gland activity in lacrimal drainage obstruction: exploring the potential cross-talk between the tear secretion and outflow.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of lacrimal drainage obstructions on the lacrimal gland activity and if there exists a potential link between the two. METHODS: Direct assessment of the lacrimal gland activity from the palpebral lobe was performed in consecutive patients diagnosed with unilateral primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO), along with Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), non-invasive tear break up time (NIBUT; Oculus K5M), tear meniscus height and Schirmer I. The primary outcome measure was the difference in the tear flow rate between the eye with PANDO and the contralateral uninvolved eye. RESULTS: Thirty patients (median age, 45.5 years; 25 females) with unilateral PANDO had epiphora for a mean duration of 20 months. The mean OSDI score was 6.3. NIBUT (mean 11.56 vs 11.58 s; p=0.49) and Schirmer I values (mean 18.83 vs 19.4 mm; p=0.313) were not significantly different between PANDO and non-PANDO eyes. The morphology of the palpebral lobe (size 29.3 vs 28.6 mm2, p=0.41) and the number of lacrimal ductular openings (median 2 vs 2.5) were similar between the two eyes. The mean tear flow from the lacrimal glands of the PANDO side was significantly reduced compared with the contralateral uninvolved side (0.8 vs 0.99 µL/min; p=0.014)). CONCLUSION: Tear flow rate from palpebral lobes of patients with unilateral lacrimal outflow obstruction shows a significant reduction compared with the contralateral side. The potential ways of communications between the tear drainage and the tear production mechanisms need to be explored further.

Is a bacterial biofilm in the lacrimal sac the cause of chronic refractory dacryocystitis? - A pilot study.

PURPOSE: A pilot study to identify bacterial biofilm in the lacrimal sacs of patients with chronic dacryocystitis, and in patients with epiphora but without discharge, using scanning electron microscopy. METHODS: Five patients: two with nasolacrimal duct obstruction without dacryocystitis, and three with dacryocystitis refractory to antibiotics, underwent external dacryocystorhinostomy. One control patient without infection was included. Bacterial cultures were obtained from the lumen of the lacrimal sac to analyze possible bacterial growth, including antibiotic resistance. Biopsies were taken from all lacrimal sacs and prepared for light and scanning electron microscopy. RESULTS: Scanning electron microscopy of all the lacrimal sac samples revealed structures consistent with bacterial communities and adjacent extracellular material, indicating biofilm formation. This was most prominent in one of the patients with chronic dacryocystitis. Bacteria were found not only on the luminal surface of the sac, but also within the tissue of the sac. Bacterial growth was identified in samples from two patients with chronic dacryocystitis, whereas samples from the other three patients showed no bacterial growth. CONCLUSION: Lack of patency of the lacrimal duct predisposes to bacterial growth, even in patients with no clinically confirmed infection of the lacrimal sac. The finding of a biofilm in patients with chronic dacryocystitis explains the lack of efficiency of antibiotic treatment at the concentrations used in clinical practice.

[Concrements of the lacrimal apparatus]. / Konkremente des Tränenapparates.

Concrements of the lacrimal apparatus, known as dacryoliths, can occur at different localizations and can cause a variety of symptoms. A common clinical sign is chronic inflammation, possibly exhibiting acute exacerbation. Based on a literature review and descriptive clinical cases with histopathological correlations, this contribution summarises the most important information concerning epidemiology, aetiopathogenesis, composition, histology, and therapy of lacrimal concrements. Furthermore, factors known to affect lacrimal lithogenesis are addressed. Concrements of the lacrimal gland cause a swelling at the lateral canthus. With only mild pain, this manifests as circumscribed conjunctival hyperaemia. Histologically, the gland tissue is characterised by acute-erosive to chronic inflammation. The concrements consist of amorphic material. Inflammatory infiltration is dominated by neutrophil granulocytes. Canalicular concrements are highly correlated with chronic canaliculitis. Besides epiphora, patients present with purulent discharge at the affected canaliculus. Actinomyces are frequently found inside these deposits and form drusen-like formations. The surrounding tissue reacts with plasma-cellular and granulocytic inflammation. Dacryoliths (concrements of the lacrimal sac) are associated with dacryocystitis, whereby acute and chronic types are common. Stones can be found in up to 18% of patients undergoing dacryocystorhinostomy or dacryoendoscopy. Preoperative diagnostic testing is challenging, as many lacrimal sac stones cannot be reliably visualised by diagnostic procedures. Recurring episodes of epiphora, mucopurulent discharge, and dacryocystitis are common indicators of dacryoliths. Lacrimal syringing is often possible and shows that total blockage is not present. Histology of the lacrimal mucosa reveals lymphocytic infiltration and submucosal fibrosis. The immediate vicinity of the dacryoliths shows acute inflammation. Therapy consists of stone extraction and improving lacrimal drainage, as the latter is recognised as the main risk factor for dacryolith formation.

Clinical outcomes of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy without preserving mucosal flaps in combination with silicone stent and steroid-soaked gelfoam.

PURPOSE: To report clinical outcomes of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (En-DCR) combined with stenting and without preserving the nasal and lacrimal mucosal flaps. METHODS: In this prospective interventional case series, patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction who were candidates for En-DCR were enrolled. Patients with a known history of previous DCR, sinus surgery, rhinoplasty, nasal trauma, nasal anomaly, canalicular or punctal occlusion, or less than one year of follow-up were excluded. All patients underwent En-DCR and stenting followed by ostial packing using Gelfoam soaked with dexamethasone. The patients were assessed preoperatively, on the first postoperative day, after 2 weeks, 3 months, and 1 year. Postoperative outcomes were anatomical and functional success, defined as patent irrigation test and resolution of epiphora, respectively. The nasolacrimal drainage system was evaluated anatomically and functionally during the follow-up period. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients with a mean age of 54.36±15.27 years were enrolled. Of these, 61 patients (73.5%) were women. The mean duration of follow-up was 20.7±6.9 months. Anatomical success was achieved in all patients and remained stable during the study duration and at 1 year. Functional failure leading to epiphora was observed in 1 patient 3 months after surgery and resolved after re-DCR at year 1. Preoperative tenderness and purulent reflux were observed in 12%, 33.7% of which completely resolved postoperatively. Moderate and severe hemorrhage was observed in 12 (14.5%) and 2 (2.4%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: En-DCR without mucosal flap preservation in combination with silicone stent and steroid-soaked Gelfoam is a safe and highly successful procedure in patients with primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

Comparison of the surgical outcomes of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy in chronic dacryocystitis with or without previous bicanalicular silicone tube intubation.

AIMS: To compare the outcomes of endoscopic dacryocystorhinostomy (En-DCR) in chronic dacryocystitis (CD) with or without previous bicanalicular silicone tube intubation (BSTI), and investigate whether previous BSTI influenced postoperative outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of medical records of CD patients (group A) who had previously undergone BSTI for nasolacrimal duct stenosis and an age- and sex-matched control group of CD patients (group B) without previous intubation receiving En-DCR from November 2017 to January 2022. Sixty-one patients (61 eyes) were included in group A and age- and sex-matched 122 patients (122 eyes) in group B. Dacryocystic parameters were measured by computed tomography-dacryocystography and surgical findings were recorded during surgeries. The surgical success rates of the two groups were compared at 12 months post-operation. RESULTS: The mean horizontal, sagittal, and vertical lengths were 6.06 ± 1.24, 6.03 ± 1.44, and 8.05 ± 2.00 mm, respectively, in group A and 6.33 ± 1.25, 6.26 ± 1.19, and 10.40 ± 2.45 mm, respectively, in group B. There were no differences in the horizontal or sagittal parameters between the two groups. The vertical parameter in group A was significantly lower than that in group B. Scar formation in the sac was observed in 54 patients in group A but was absent in group B. At 12 months postoperatively, the anatomical and functional success rates were 88.52 % and 85.25 %, respectively, in group A and 92.62 % and 89.34 %, respectively, in group B, with no difference between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Previous BSTI reduced dacryocyst vertical parameter and caused dacryocyst scar formation but did not affect postoperative En-DCR efficacy.

Canalicular obstruction associated with dupilumab.

PURPOSE: Dupilumab is a novel treatment for severe atopic dermatitis and is associated with a range of ocular complications such as blepharoconjunctivitis, keratitis, cicatricial ectropion and punctal stenosis. METHODS: We report 4 patients with canalicular obstruction in association with dupilumab therapy, and we describe their treatment and outcomes in each case. RESULTS: Canalicular obstruction was diagnosed by an oculoplastic consultant between 3 years and 3 months and 4 years and 9 months after the commencement of dupilumab therapy. Case 1 underwent nasolacrimal intubation, case 2 was treated conservatively, and case 4 underwent endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy and these patients' symptoms resolved. Unfortunately, in case 3 despite endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy with stenting they remained symptomatic. CONCLUSION: This case series adds to the growing number of ocular complications associated with dupilumab therapy, and there is yet an optimal treatment strategy to mitigate these complications. It is possible that simple conservative measures such as discontinuation of dupilumab and topical treatments with steroids can eventually lead to some form of recovery and recanalisation of the canalicular system. Early referral to an ophthalmologist prior to the development of canalicular obstruction to control the inflammatory ocular surface could reduce the risks of cicatricial sequelae from dupilumab, and temporary stenting of the canalicular system could be attempted as a method to keep the canalicular system patent, whilst the patient remained on treatment.

High incidence and recurrence of tympanostomy tube procedures in children who underwent nasolacrimal duct probe and intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction.

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of tympanostomy tube (T-tube) insertion in children who required probing and intubation for congenital nasolacrimal duct obstruction (CNLDO) at a single academic institution and to analyze success rates. METHODS: The medical records of 92 patients who underwent nasolacrimal probing and intubation for CNLDO over a 9-year period were reviewed retrospectively. A preoperative questionnaire was given to the patient's guardian concerning laterality of CNLDO, history of otitis media (OM) antibiotic therapy, history of T-tube placement and number placed. At least 12 months following the initial nasolacrimal duct P&I, a second questionnaire was administered regarding resolution of CNLDO symptoms, additional measures taken to relieve postoperative symptoms if present, and any further history regarding OM episodes or T-tube insertion. RESULTS: Of the 92 children with CNLDO, 37 (40%) required T-tubes either prior to or following nasolacrimal duct probing and intubation, a rate higher than in the general population (P < 0.00001). 21 (56%) of CNLDO probing and intubation patients who required T-tubes required at least two sets, at different times, to relieve OM symptoms. Six of 37 patients (16%) with a history of T-tube placement and 1 of 55 (2%) with no history of T-tube placement had persistent epiphora after nasolacrimal probing and intubation (relative risk, 8.92; P = 0.0388). CONCLUSIONS: In our study cohort, pediatric patients with CNLDO who required nasolacrimal probing and intubation were at higher risk of needing T-tubes for chronic OM than the general population, and those needing T-tubes were at increased risk of residual epiphora.