The effect of different hybrid rigid internal fixation techniques on the postoperative stability following a mandibular advancement using a bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy: A retrospective three-dimensional comparative study.

OBJECTIVE: To three-dimensionally evaluate post-operative mandibular stability following bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomies between hybrid and non-hybrid rigid internal fixation techniques. MATERIALS AND METHOD: Seventy adults with skeletal class II deformity who underwent bilateral split sagittal osteotomy with mandibular advancement were included. Patients were divided into four groups based on their fixation techniques: hybrid technique (HT) groups I, II, and IV received a 4-hole 2 mm miniplate with either a bicortical screw (BS), additional 2 mm 4-hole miniplate, or two-hole miniplate, while non-HT group III received a 4-hole 2 mm miniplate with four mini-screws (MS). Measurements were taken pre-operatively (T0), immediately postoperatively (T1), and ≥1 year after surgery (T2) using 3D Slicer software. RESULTS: Age, sex, and follow-up period did not correlate significantly with postoperative relapse or stability. Significant differences were observed in the advancement on the right side between groups II, III, and IV and on the left side between groups I, III, and IV. However, the type of surgical intervention showed no significant effect on postoperative relapse and stability. All groups of fixations showed satisfactory stability with irrelevant relapse (< 2 mm or 2°). CONCLUSION: The study demonstrated satisfactory and comparable stability among different fixation groups on patients undergoing mandibular advancement following bilateral split sagittal osteotomy. The results highlighted the importance of considering the degree of advancement when planning orthognathic surgery and managing postoperative outcomes.

The TSAR-osteotomy, a total subapical and ramus osteotomy: A technical note.

There are several treatment options to treat a class II dentofacial deformity with a pronounced chin. A total subapical osteotomy is one of these options. This type of osteotomy was refined to total subapical and ramus (TSAR) osteotomy. In this technical note, a detailed and schematic presentation of the TSAR osteotomy is presented step by step. The surgical approach to the TSAR osteotomy is divided into three parts. The first part consists of the horizontal osteotomy at the level of the ramus, the second part approaches the corticotomy to release and protect the mental nerve and the third part consists of connecting the horizontal ramus osteotomy and the local corticotomy around the mental nerve. In this third part, it is important that the inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) is actively sought and protected.

Which factors affect the lingual fracture pattern in sagittal split ramus osteotomy?

The purpose of this study was to elucidate the effects of mandibular anatomy and osteotomy technique on lingual fracture patterns in SSRO. The predictor variables were: length of horizontal medial osteotomy; type of border osteotomy; buccolingual width; and vertical length of the basal cortex. The outcome variable was the type of lingual split pattern. This was categorized into four types according to a lingual split scale (LSS): LSS 1, true Hunsuck; LSS 2, fracture line to posterior border of the ramus; LSS 3, through to mandibular canal; LSS 4, unfavorable fracture pattern. Data were analyzed using analysis of variance and the Pearson χ2 test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The study sample comprised 312 lingual split patterns in 156 patients. The most common type of lingual split pattern was LSS 1 (n = 204). There was a significant relationship between inferior border osteotomy type and LSS type (p = 0.001). Whilst LSS 1 was the most common among all border osteotomy types. LSS 4 was most frequently observed in cases where the lower border osteotomy remained in the buccal surface. According to the results of this study, the likelihood of an unfavorable split pattern increases when the lower border osteotomy remains in the buccal surface.

Change in taste sensation after orthognathic surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of orthognathic surgery on taste sensation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-five patients scheduled to undergo Le Fort I osteotomy (LFIO), sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO), and bimaxillary surgery (BMS) were evaluated by administering localized and whole-mouth taste tests preoperatively and postoperatively at months 1, 3, and 6. The patients were asked to identify the quality of four basic tastes applied to six locations on the palate and tongue and to rate the taste intensities they perceived. Taste recognition thresholds and taste intesity scores were evaluted according to operation groups and follow-ups. RESULTS: There were significant decreases in the quinine HCl recognition thresholds at the postoperative follow-ups compared to the preoperative in LFIO patients (p = 0.043). There were significant decreases in sucrose taste intensity scores in the right posterolateral part of the tongue at months 3 and 6 compared to preoperative in SSRO patients (p = 0.046), and significant increases in quinine HCL taste intensity scores in the right and left anterior parts of the tongue at month 6 compared to preoperative in LFIO patients (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Taste perception is affected due to potential damage to the chemosensory nerves during orthognathic surgical procedures. Generally, non-significant alterations have been observed in taste perception after orthognathic surgery, except for significant alterations in bitter and sweet taste perceptions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Maxillofacial surgeons should be aware of taste perception change after orthognathic surgery procedures and patients should be informed accordingly. THE TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER (TRN): NCT06103422/Date of registration: 10.17.2023 (retrospectively registered).

Effect of Orthognathic Surgery On Pulp Blood Flow and Pulp Sensibility: A Prospective Control Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Orthognathic surgery has the potential to compromise the vitality of the teeth. This paper aims to assess changes in pulp blood flow (PBF) and pulp sensibility (PS) of the anterior dentition following orthognathic surgery and to assess the influence of the proximity of the surgical osteotomy on the PBF and/or PS. METHODS: Twenty-six patients undergoing orthognathic surgery (Le Fort I or bilateral sagittal split osteotomy [BSSO]) were compared to sixteen control patients treated by fixed appliances only using Laser Doppler flowmeter (LDF) and thermal testing (CO2 snow). Surgery patients were tested at T1 (presurgery), T2 (4-5 weeks postsurgery), T3 (3 months postsurgery), and T4 (6 months postsurgery). Control patients were tested at T1 (pretreatment), T2 (6 months posttreatment), T3 (12 months posttreatment), and T4 (18 months posttreatment). Differences between the maxilla and mandible were assessed. RESULTS: No differences in PBF or PS were recorded in the control group. In the surgery group, both jaws followed the same pattern after surgery, an initial decrease at T2 followed by a gradual recovery to pretreatment PBF levels with no significant difference between T1 versus T4 in both jaws. No difference in PBF was observed between the maxilla and mandible at any testing time interval. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: PBF and PS of the anterior dentition was severely affected immediately postsurgery, followed by a gradual increase to full recovery. This pattern of recovery was exhibited in both jaws. A negative sensibility response or discoloration should not be seen as an indication of irreversible ischemic pulp changes. Monitoring for at least 6 months or using LDF as a confirmatory test is required before any irreversible endodontic treatment is to be considered.

The effect of tongue reduction for preventing adverse effects in patients undergoing class III orthognathic surgery: a three-dimensional comparative analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to evaluate the potential benefits of combining tongue reduction with mandibular setback surgery in patients undergoing class III orthognathic surgery. Specifically, we investigated whether this combined approach reduced the risk of surgical relapse, condylar resorption, and airway space reduction by mitigating tongue pressure on the mandible. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study retrospectively enrolled patients who had undergone bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSRO) with at least 5 mm of setback and met the criteria of a body mass index > 20 kg/m2 and tongue volume > 100 mm3. The study included 20 patients with 10 in the tongue reduction group (TR, n = 10) and 10 in the BSSRO only group (SO, n = 10). RESULTS: The volumetric changes of the total airway space were significantly different between the TR and SO groups (p = 0.028). However, no significant differences were observed in the condylar resorption and postoperative relapse between the groups (p = 0.927 and 0.913, respectively). The difference between the resorption of the anterior and posterior segments of the condyle was also statistically insignificant (p = 0.826). Postoperative counterclockwise rotation of the proximal segment only demonstrated a significant correlation with postoperative relapse (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: The reduction in tongue volume demonstrated a preventive effect on the reduction of the airway space after mandibular setback, although it did not yield statistical significance concerning surgical relapse and condylar volume. The counterclockwise rotation of the proximal segment might be responsible for the forward displacement of the distal segment and postoperative relapse. However, the clinical implications of this finding should be interpreted with caution owing to the limited sample size CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Tongue reduction could potentially serve as a preventive measure in preserving the airway space and might be beneficial in mitigating the risk of obstructive sleep apnea in patients with class III deformity.

[Mandibular condyle localization in orthognathic surgery based on mandibular movement trajectory and its preliminary accuracy verification].

OBJECTIVE: To establish and assess the precision of pre-surgical condyle position planning using mandibular movement trajectory data for orthognathic surgery. METHODS: Skull data from large-field cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and dental oral scan data were imported into IVSPlan 1.0.25 software for 3D reconstruction and fusion, creating 3D models of the maxilla and mandible. Trajectory data of mandibular movement were collected using a mandibular motion recorder, and the data were integrated with the jaw models within the software. Subsequently, three-dimensional trajectories of the condyle were obtained through matrix transformations, rendering them visually accessible. A senior oral and maxillofacial surgeon with experience in both diagnosis and treatment of temporomandibular joint disease and orthognathic surgery selected the appropriate condyle position using the condyle movement trajectory interface. During surgical design, the mobile mandibular proximal segment was positioned accordingly. Routine orthognathic surgical planning was completed by determining the location of the mandibular distal segment, which was based on occlusal relationships with maxilla and facial aesthetics. A virtual mandible model was created by integrating data from the proximal and distal segment bone. Subsequently, a solid model was generated through rapid prototyping. The titanium plate was pre-shaped on the mandibular model, and the screw hole positions were determined to design a condylar positioning guide device. In accordance with the surgical plan, orthognathic surgery was performed, involving mandibular bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO). The distal segment of the mandible was correctly aligned intermaxillary, while the proximal bone segment was positioned using the condylar positioning guide device and the pre-shaped titanium plate. The accuracy of this procedure was assessed in a study involving 10 patients with skeletal class Ⅱ malocclusion. Preoperative condyle location planning and intraoperative positioning were executed using the aforementioned techniques. CBCT data were collected both before the surgery and 2 weeks after the procedure, and the root mean square (RMS) distance between the preope-rative design position and the actual postoperative condyle position was analyzed. RESULTS: The RMS of the condyle surface distance measured was (1.59±0.36) mm (95%CI: 1.35-1.70 mm). This value was found to be significantly less than 2 mm threshold recommended by the expert consensus (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The mandibular trajectory may play a guiding role in determining the position of the mandibular proximal segment including the condyle in the orthognathic surgery. Through the use of a condylar positioning guide device and pre-shaped titanium plates, the condyle positioning can be personalized and customized with clinically acceptable accuracy.

[Comparison of the virtual surgical planning position of maxilla and condyle with the postoperative real position in patients with mandibular protrusion].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the difference between virtual surgical planning (VSP) position and postoperative real position of maxilla and condyle, and to explore the degree of intraoperative realization of VSP after orthognathic surgery. METHODS: In this study, 36 patients with mandibular protrusion deformity from January 2022 to December 2022 were included. All the patients had been done bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) combined with Le Fort Ⅰ osteotomy under guidance of VSP. The VSP data (T0) and 1-week postoperative CT (T1) were collected, the 3D model of postoperative CT was established and segmented into upper and lower jaws in CCMF Plan software. At the same time, accor-ding to the morphology of palatal folds, the virtual design was registered with the postoperative model, and the unclear maxillary dentition in the postoperative model was replaced. Then the postoperative model was matched with VSP model by registration of upper skull anatomy that was not affected by the operation. The three-dimensional reference plane and coordinate system were established. Selecting anatomical landmarks and their connections of condyle and maxilla for the measurement, we compared the coordinate changes of marker points in three directions, and the angle changes between the line connecting the marker points and the reference plane to analyze the positional deviation and the angle deviation of the postoperative condyle and maxilla compared to VSP. RESULTS: The postoperative real position of the maxilla deviates from the VSP by nearly 1 mm in the horizontal and vertical directions, and the anteroposterior deviation was about 1.5 mm. In addition, most patients had a certain degree of counterclockwise rotation of the maxilla after surgery. Most of the bilateral condyle moved forward, outward and downward (the average distance deviation was 0.15 mm, 1.54 mm, 2.19 mm, respectively), and rotated forward, outward and upward (the average degree deviation was 4.32°, 1.02°, 0.86°, respectively) compared with the VSP. CONCLUSION: VSP can be mostly achieved by assistance of 3D printed occlusal plates, but there are certain deviations in the postoperative real position of maxilla and condyle compared with VSP, which may be related to the rotation axis of the mandible in the VSP. It is necessary to use patient personalized condylar rotation axis for VSP, and apply condylar positioning device to further improve surgical accuracy.

Validation of a fully automatic three-dimensional assessment of orthognathic surgery.

The aim of the present study was to propose and validate FAST3D: a fully automatic three-dimensional (3D) assessment of the surgical accuracy and the long-term skeletal stability of orthognathic surgery. To validate FAST3D, the agreement between FAST3D and a validated state-of-the-art semi-automatic method was calculated by intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) at a 95 % confidence interval. A one-sided hypothesis test was performed to evaluate whether the absolute discrepancy between the measurements produced by the two methods was statistically significantly below a clinically relevant error margin of 0.5 mm. Ten subjects (six male, four female; mean age 24.4 years), class II and III, who underwent a combined three-piece Le Fort I osteotomy, bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and genioplasty, were included in the validation study. The agreement between the two methods was excellent for all measurements, ICC range (0.85-1.00), and fair for the rotational stability of the chin, ICC = 0.54. The absolute discrepancy for all measurements was statistically significantly lower than the clinical relevant error margin (p < 0.008). Within the limitations of the present validation study, FAST3D demonstrated to be reliable and may be adopted whenever appropriate in order to reduce the work load of the medical staff.

Simultaneous standard total joint prosthesis reconstruction with SSRO and Le Fort I osteotomy in the treatment of unilateral temporomandibular joint ankylosis with jaw deformity: a case cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Unilateral temporomandibular joint ankylosis with jaw deformity (UTMJAJD) may require simultaneous total joint prosthesis (TJP) reconstruction, sagittal split ramus (SSRO), and Le Fort I osteotomies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate outcomes in patients treated with these procedures. METHODS: Patients diagnosed UTMJAJD between 2016 and 2018 were selected for the study. Mandible-first procedure was performed after ankylosis release with TJP on the ankylosed side and SSRO on the contralateral side. Le Fort I osteotomy with and without genioplasty was lastly performed. Maximal incisor opening (MIO), facial symmetry, and jaw and condyle stability were compared before, after operation, and during follow-ups. RESULTS: Seven patients were included in the study. Their average chin deviation was 9.5 ± 4.2 mm, and maxillary cant was 5.1 ± 3.0°. After operation, jaw deformity significantly improved, with chin deviation corrected 7.6 ± 4.1 mm (p = 0.015) and advanced 5.9 ± 2.5 mm (p = 0.006). After an average follow-up of 26.6 ± 17.1 months, MIO significantly increased from 11.4 ± 9.3 to 35.7 ± 2.6 mm (p = 0.000). The occlusion was stable with no significant positional or rotational changes of the jaw (p > 0.05). There was no obvious condylar resorption during follow-ups. CONCLUSION: Simultaneous TJP reconstruction, SSRO, and Le Fort I osteotomy are reliable and effective methods for the treatment of UTMJAJD.

Comparative Analysis of Temperature-Responsive Hydrogel (PF 72) for Postoperative Pain After Bimaxillary Surgery: A Retro-spective Study.

Bimaxillary surgery is a painful invasive procedure in plastic surgery. Pain control is typically achieved using intravenous analgesics. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of a novel temperature-responsive hydrogel, PF72, mixed with ropivacaine, as a local pain management solution when applied directly to the surgical site following orthognathic surgery. The study was conducted from October 2022 to July 2023 and included a cohort of 40 candidates for orthognathic surgery, encompassing LeFort I maxillary ostectomy and sagittal split ramus osteotomy. The participants were divided into an Injection group (n = 20), where PF72 was administered at the surgical site before the orthognathic surgery, and a Control group (n = 20), which relied solely on intravenous analgesics. Pain was evaluated at 3, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery using a numerical rating scale (NRS). The mean NRS scores at 24 h were 6.35 and 4 for the Control and Injection groups, respectively. The mean NRS scores at 72 h were 3.4 and 2.55 for the Control and Injection groups, respectively. Patients who received PF72 experienced less pain than those who received intravenous analgesics. These findings underscore the potential of PF72 as an effective alternative for enhancing pain management in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery.Level of Evidence III Therapeutic study. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Evaluation of bone contact area and intercondylar distance changes in orthognathic surgery - a comparison between BSSO and HSSO technique depending on mandibular displacement extent.

OBJECTIVES: The present study aims to assess the impact of bilateral and high oblique sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO/HSSO), as well as displacement distances and directions on the expected and achievable bone contact area (BCA) and changes in the intercondylar distance (ICD). The primary question addressed is whether mandibular splitting through BSSO results in a greater BCA and/or ICD when compared to splitting through HSSO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Totally 80 mandibular displacements were performed on 20 fresh cadavers, for each subject, four splints were produces to facilitate mandibular advancement as well as setbacks of 4 and 8 mm. Pre- and postoperative CBCT scans were performed to plan the surgical procedures and to analyze the expected and achieved BCA and ICD. RESULTS: Regarding the maximum mandibular displacement, the expected BCA for HSSO/BSSO were 352.58 ± 96.55mm2 and 1164.00 ± 295.50mm2, respectively, after advancement and 349.11 ± 98.42mm2 and 1344.70 ± 287.23mm2, respectively, after setback. The achieved BCA for HSSO/BSSO were 229.37 ± 75.90mm2 and 391.38 ± 189.01mm2, respectively, after advancement and 278.03 ± 97.65mm2 and 413.52 ± 169.52 mm2, respectively after setback. The expected ICD for HSSO/BSSO were 4.51 ± 0.73 mm and 3.25 ± 1.17 mm after advancement and - 5.76 ± 1.07 mm and - 4.28 ± 1.58 mm after setback. The achieved ICD for HSSO/BSSO were 2.07 ± 2.9 mm and 1.7 ± 0.60 mm after advancement and - 2.57 ± 2.78 mm and - 1.28 ± 0.84 mm after setback. Significant differences between the BCA after HSSO and BSSO were at each displacement (p < 0.001), except for the achieved BCA after 8-mm setback and advancement (p ≥ 0.266). No significant differences were observed regarding ICD, except for the expected ICD after 8-mm setback and advancement (p ≤ 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the virtual planning, the predictability regarding BCA and ICD was limited. ICD showed smaller clinical changes, BCA decreased significantly in the BSSO group. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: BCA and ICD might have been less important in choosing the suitable split technique. in orthognathic surgery.

Accuracy and stability of the condyle position after orthognathic surgery: A retrospective study.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and stability of condylar positioning in patients treated with bimaxillary procedures compared with patients treated with maxillary procedures alone. All patients had undergone treatment at Odense University Hospital and were treated with inferior maxillary procedures. The primary outcome was changes in condyle position and the primary predictor variable was time: pre-operative (T0) measurements to 1-week post-operative (T1) and 1-year post-operative (T2) measurements. Condyle movement was measured using dual voxel-based alignment. Sixteen patients were included. Seven patients underwent solitary maxillary procedure and 9 patients bimaxillary procedure. Bimaxillary procedures overall showed a condyle positional change in pitch from T0 to T1 and T1 to T2 compared to maxillary procedures alone. Condylar translation was stable despite large differences in positioning. Compared to solitary maxillary procedures, bimaxillary procedures showed a statistically significant anterocranial rotation at 1-week follow-up movement (3.95° vs. -0.95°; SD 3,74 vs 1,05; P value = 0.000) and an additional statistically significant anterocranial movement at 1 year after surgery (4.89° vs 0.60°; SD 3,82 vs 0,92; P value = 0.000). In conclusion a need for greater anterocranial stability of the sagittal split osteotomy than that provided by 3 bicortically fixated screws alone might be indicated.

Determining the safety margin of mandibular lingula in sagittal split ramus osteotomy.

PURPOSE: The anatomical position of the lingula is clinically very important to prevent injuries during sagittal split ramus osteotomy. Our study aims to evaluate the localisation of the lingula by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to compare the localisation of the lingula between malocclusion, gender, and lingula types. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the shape and location of the lingula using CBCT. A total of 250 CBCT images were included in this study. The lingula was classified as nodular, assimilated, truncated, or triangular type. Six defined distances from the top of the lingula were measured: anterior border of the ramus (L-A), posterior border of the ramus (L-P), internal oblique ridge (L-IOR), mandibular notch (L-N), and distal surface of the mandibular second molar (L-M2) and occlusal plane (L-OP). The measured distances were compared between gender, malocclusion, and lingula types. RESULTS: The most common type of lingula was nodular (32.4%). The L-N, L-P, L-M2, and L-OP distances between genders were statistically higher in male patients than in female patients. The L-IOR, L-M2, and L-OP distances exhibited statistically significant differences found between malocclusions. No statistically significant difference was found when the distances of the lingula to the anatomical points were compared between the lingula types. CONCLUSION: These variations in positioning of the lingula depending on the dysmorphoses are developing towards a systematic 3D examination before any mandibular osteotomy to precisely visualize the position and shape of the lingula.

Assessment of temporomandibular joint disc position and skeletal stability after bimaxillary surgery.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the correlation between temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc position and skeletal stability and identify the cephalometric measurements associated with relapse after bimaxillary surgery. METHODS: The participants were 62 women with jaw deformities (124 joints) who underwent bimaxillary surgery. The TMJ disc position was classified into four types (anterior disc displacement (ADD), anterior, fully covered, and posterior) using magnetic resonance imaging, and cephalometric analysis was performed preoperatively and 1 week and 1 year postoperatively. The differences between pre- and 1-week postoperative values (T1) and 1-week and 1-year postoperative value (T2) were calculated for all cephalometric measurements. Moreover, the relationship between skeletal stability using cephalometric measurements, skeletal class, and TMJ disc position was analyzed. RESULTS: The participants included 28 patients in class II and 34 in class III. There was a significant difference in T2 in SNB between class II mandibular advancement cases and class III mandibular setback cases (P = 0.0001). In T2, in ramus inclination, there was a significant difference between the ADD and posterior types (P = 0.0371). Stepwise regression analysis revealed that T2 was significantly correlated with T1 for all measurements. However, the TMJ classification was not applied to all measurements. CONCLUSION: This study suggested that TMJ disc position, including ADD, could not affect skeletal stability, including the maxilla and distal segment after bimaxillary osteotomy, and short-term relapse could be related to the movement amount or angle change by surgery for all measurements.

Bilateral sagittal split osteotomy with or without concomitant removal of third molars: a retrospective cohort study of related complications and bone healing.

PURPOSE: To carry out a comparative evaluation of the intra- and postoperative complications, and bone healing, following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) with or without concomitant removal of third molars. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of two cohorts subjected to BSSO with the intraoperative removal of third molars (test group) versus the removal of third molars at least 6 months prior to BSSO (control group), comprising at least 1 year of clinical and radiographic follow-up. Partially or completely erupted third molars were extracted immediately before completing the osteotomy, whereas impacted third molars were removed after the osteotomy had been performed. Hardware reinforcement was performed in bimaxillary cases where concomitant molar extraction impeded placement of the retromolar bicortical screw of the hybrid technique. RESULTS: A total of 80 surgical sites were included (40 in each group). Concomitant extraction of the molar represented a mean increase in surgery time of 3.7 min (p < 0.001). No additional complications occurred in the test group (p = 0.476). The gain in bone density was preserved in both groups (p = 0.002), and the increase was of the same magnitude in both (p = 0.342), despite the fact that the immediate and final postoperative bone densities were significantly higher in the control group (p = 0.020). CONCLUSION: The results obtained support concomitant molar extraction with BSSO as a feasible option.

Quantifying bone healing after mandibular displacement in orthognathic surgery.

Impaired bony healing following bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) is a major unmet medical need for affected patients, and rare occurrences can hinder the identification of underlying risk factors. We hypothesised that osseous union following BSSO can be quantified using volumetric analysis, and we aimed to identify the risk factors for impaired bone healing. The percentage change in bony volume was measured in orthognathic patients following BSSO using two consecutive postoperative cone-beam computed tomography scans. Patients' characteristics and treatment parameters were documented, and correlation and regression analyses of these variables performed. Thirty-six patients (23 men and 13 women) with a mean (SD) age of 33.28 (11.86) years were included. The gap site (lingual versus buccal) (p < 0.01) had a significant impact on the change in volume. Age (p = 0.06) showed a trend towards significance. Initial width of the osteotomy gap, sex, and indication for surgery did not influence osseous healing. Increased age at surgery and the side of the buccal osteotomy are independent risk factors for impaired osseous healing following BSSO.

Does Articular Disc Position Change Following Mandibular Setback Surgery?

BACKGROUND: Maintaining condyle position following bilateral sagittal split ramus osteotomy (BSSO) is crucial to minimizing postoperative relapse. However, the impact of BSSO on the articular disc position remains inconclusive. PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the changes in articular disc position following setback BSSO surgery. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, AND SAMPLING: In this prospective cohort study, subjects with mandibular prognathism requiring setback BSSO were enrolled between August 2021 and June 2022 at the Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinic, Faculty of Dentistry, Chiang Mai University, Thailand. Patients with surgical complications, loss of follow-up, or significant artifacts in their MR images were excluded. PREDICTOR/EXPOSURE/INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: The predictor variable was time. The articular disc position was assessed at 3 time points, preoperatively (T0), 3 months postsurgery (T1), and 6 months postsurgery (T2). MAIN OUTCOME: The primary and secondary outcome variables were the changes in articular disc position between T0-T2 and T0-T1, respectively. Articular disc position was coded as normal, anterior disc displacement with reduction (ADDwR), anterior disc displacement without reduction (ADDwoR), and anterior disc displacement without reduction and degenerative joint disease (ADDwoR + DJD). COVARIATES: Covariate variables collected included age (years), sex (male or female), asymmetry (present or absent), surgical procedure (single jaw (BSSO) or bimaxillary surgery), and setback distance (millimeters). ANALYSES: Friedman's test with 80% power and a significance level of 0.05 was employed. Pairwise comparisons were performed using the Dunn-Bonferroni posthoc test to identify statistically significant differences. RESULTS: The study included 16 subjects, 6 females and 10 males, with a total of 32 TMJs. Subjects had a mean age of 23.75 (4.57) years. The proportion of TMJs with normal disc position postoperatively increased from 3 (9.4%) to 19 (59.4%). Statistically significant differences were found in the changes in disc position over time (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Following setback BSSO, the articular discs underwent changes, with a majority of ADDwR cases transitioning to a normal position. Cases with ADDwoR also demonstrated disc reduction capability after surgery. The combined orthodontic treatment and setback BSSO appear to have an effect on articular disc position in skeleton class III patients.

Relationship of the Degree of Nerve Exposure and Surgical Manipulation and Short-Term Neurosensory Disturbance Following Sagittal Split Ramus Osteotomy: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Neurosensory disturbance (NSD) is a common complication after sagittal split ramus osteotomy (SSRO) due to inferior alveolar nerve (IAN) injury. The impact of intraoperative nerve manipulation on NSD remains debated. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the influence of IAN exposure and manipulation during SSRO on functional sensory recovery (FSR). STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-center, prospective cohort study of 40 patients undergoing SSRO at Mahidol University from December 2020 to December 2021. The inclusion criteria were patients aged 20-34, ASA Class I-II. The exclusion criteria were patients with systemic bone disease, history of head and neck or neurological pathology, previous SSRO, or incomplete data collection. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: Degree of intraoperative nerve manipulation was divided by the attending surgeon as follows; 1) Nerve fully encased in distal segment and not visible (NS); 2) Nerve encased in distal segment but partially visible (DS); and 3) Nerve partially encased in proximal segment and fully dissected free (PS). OUTCOME VARIABLES: The area of interest was divided into the lip and chin. The primary outcome was time to FSR. The secondary outcome was subjective patient report, using a visual analogue scale, compared to FSR. COVARIATES: The covariates were sex, age, skeletal diagnosis, degree of movement, and concomitant genioplasty/subapical procedure. ANALYSES: Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, Cox proportional hazards regression, and Mcnemar test were utilized. P-value < .05 was significant. RESULTS: In the lip, the median times to FSR were NS, 2 days; DS, 45 days; PS, 102 days. (Interquartile range: 77,127, 114, respectively) In the chin, the median times to FSR were NS, 23 days; DS, 92 days; PS, 87 days. (Interquartile range: 77, 161, 101, respectively.) Nerve manipulation significantly affected FSR in the lip and chin (P = .001, <0.001, respectively. Cox hazard ratios for DS and PS were lower compared to NS. Patients consistently reported more NSD compared to FSR as per Mcnemar test. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: After SSRO, FSR in the lip is prolonged when the IAN is partially encased in the proximal segment and released. This raises the question of the efficacy of surgically releasing a partially encased IAN.

Comparison of the skeletal stability after mandibular counter-clockwise rotation in three surgical procedures.

The treatment of mandibular deformities with an anterior open bite is challenging. In this study, skeletal stability after mandibular osteotomies was evaluated to determine the best treatment for mandibular prognathism with an anterior open bite in three procedures: intraoral vertical ramus osteotomy (IVRO), conventional sagittal split ramus osteotomy (conv-SSRO), and SSRO without bone fixation (nonfix-SSRO). Patients who underwent mandibular osteotomy to correct skeletal mandibular protrusion were included. Changes in skeletal and soft tissues were assessed using lateral cephalograms taken before (T1), 3 ± 2 days (T2), and 12 ± 3 months (T3) after surgery. Thirty-nine patients were included: nine in the IVRO group and 11 and 19 in the conv- and nonfix-SSRO groups, respectively. The mandibular plane angles (MPAs) of the T2-T1 were - 2.7 ± 2.0 (p = 0.0040), - 3.7 ± 1.7 (p < 0.0001), and - 2.3 ± 0.7 (p < 0.0001) in the IVRO, conv-SSRO, and nonfix-SSRO groups, respectively. The skeletal relapse of the MPAs was not related to the MPA at T2-T1, and it was approximately 1.3° in the conv-SSRO group. The skeletal relapse of the MAPs was significantly correlated with the MPA of T2-T1 in the IVRO (p = 0.0402) and non-fix-SSRO (p = 0.0173) groups. When the relapse of the MPAs was less than 1.3°, the MPA of T2-T1 was calculated as 2.5° in the nonfix-SSRO group. When the MPA of T2-T1 is less than 2.5°, non-fix SSRO may produce a reliable outcome, and when it is more than 2.5°, conv-SSRO may produce better outcomes.