New closed-loop insulin systems.

Advances in diabetes technologies have enabled the development of automated closed-loop insulin delivery systems. Several hybrid closed-loop systems have been commercialised, reflecting rapid transition of this evolving technology from research into clinical practice, where it is gradually transforming the management of type 1 diabetes in children and adults. In this review we consider the supporting evidence in terms of glucose control and quality of life for presently available closed-loop systems and those in development, including dual-hormone closed-loop systems. We also comment on alternative 'do-it-yourself' closed-loop systems. We remark on issues associated with clinical adoption of these approaches, including training provision, and consider limitations of presently available closed-loop systems and areas for future enhancements to further improve outcomes and reduce the burden of diabetes management.

[Insulin-secreting organoids: a first step towards the bioartificial pancreas]. / Organoïdes sécréteurs d'insuline - Des « super-îlots ¼ comme premier pas vers le pancréas bioartificiel.

Pancreatic islet transplantation is a valid cure for selected type-1 diabetic patients. It offers a minimally invasive ß-cell replacement approach and has proven its capacity to significantly enhance patients quality of life. However, these insulin-secreting mini-organs suffer from the loss of intrinsic vascularization and extra-cellular matrix occurring during isolation, resulting in hypoxic stress and necrosis. In addition, they have to face inflammatory and immune destruction once transplanted in the liver. Organoid generation represents a strategy to overcome these obstacles by allowing size and shape control as well as composition. It does offer the possibility to add supporting cells such as endothelial cells, in order to facilitate revascularization or cells releasing anti-inflammatory and/or immunomodulatory factors. This review describes the limitations of pancreatic islet transplantation and details the benefits offered by organoids as a cornerstone toward the generation of a bioartificial pancreas.

TITLE: Organoïdes sécréteurs d'insuline - Des « super-îlots ¼ comme premier pas vers le pancréas bioartificiel. ABSTRACT: La greffe d'îlots pancréatiques permet de remplacer les cellules ß de manière minimalement invasive1, et d'améliorer significativement la qualité de vie des patients présentant un diabète de type 1. Cependant, ces mini-organes endocriniens, lorsqu'ils sont transplantés après une procédure d'extraction enzymatique du pancréas, se retrouvent déconnectés de leur vascularisation et de leur support fonctionnel. Les îlots doivent de plus faire face aux attaques des systèmes immunitaires inné et adaptatif, ainsi qu'à la récidive de l'auto-immunité. L'utilisation et la création d'organoïdes produisant et sécrétant de l'insuline permettent non seulement de contrôler et d'homogénéiser leur taille, mais également leur composition, avec la possibilité d'ajouter des cellules essentielles à leur survie, telles que des cellules endothéliales ou des cellules possédant des propriétés anti-inflammatoires et immuno-modulatrices. Dans cette revue, nous décrivons les obstacles rencontrés dans la greffe d'îlots et détaillons les bénéfices de l'utilisation d'organoïdes pour les surmonter.

Do-It-Yourself Artificial Pancreas System and the OpenAPS Movement.

People with diabetes have been experimenting with and modifying their own diabetes devices and technologies for many decades in order to achieve the best possible quality of life and improving their long-term outcomes, including do-it-yourself (DIY) closed loop systems. Thousands of individuals use DIY closed loop systems globally, which work similarly to commercial systems by automatically adjusting and controlling insulin dosing, but are different in terms of transparency, access, customization, and usability. Initial outcomes seen by the DIY artificial pancreas system community are positive, and randomized controlled trials are forthcoming on various elements of DIYAPS technology.

Diabetes Technology in the Inpatient Setting for Management of Hyperglycemia.

In past decades, a rapid evolution of diabetes technology led to increased popularity and use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) in the ambulatory setting for diabetes management, and recently, the artificial pancreas became available. Efforts to translate this technology to the hospital setting have shown accuracy and reliability of CGM, safety of CSII in appropriate populations, improvement of inpatient glycemic control with computerized glycemic management systems, and feasibility of inpatient CGM-CSII closed-loop systems. Several ongoing studies are focusing on continued translation of this technology to improve glycemic control and outcomes in hospitalized patients.

Open Source Closed-Loop Insulin Delivery Systems: A Clash of Cultures or Merging of Diverse Approaches?

Biomedical outcomes for people with diabetes remain suboptimal for many. Psychosocial care in diabetes does not fare any better. "Artificial pancreas" (also known as "closed-loop" and "automated insulin delivery") systems present a promising therapeutic option for people with diabetes (PWD)-simultaneously improving glycemic outcomes, reducing the burden of self-management, and improving health-related quality of life. In recent years there has emerged a growing movement of PWD innovators rallying behind the mantra #WeAreNotWaiting, developing "do-it-yourself artificial pancreas systems (DIY APS)." Self-reported results by DIY APS users show improved metabolic outcomes such as impressive stability of glucose profiles, significant reduction of A1c, and more time within their glycemic target range. However, the benefits remain unclear for the broader population of PWD beyond these highly engaged, highly tech-savvy users willing and able to engage in the demands of building and maintaining their DIY APS. We discuss the challenges faced by key stakeholder groups in terms of potential collaboration and open debate of these challenges.

Diabetes Technological Revolution: Winners and Losers?

Over recent years there has been an explosion in availability of technical devices to support diabetes self-management. But with this technology revolution comes new hurdles. On paper, the available diabetes technologies should mean that the vast majority of people with type 1 diabetes have optimal glycemic control and are using their preferred therapy choices. Yet, it does not appear to be universally the case. In parallel, suboptimal glycemic control remains stubbornly widespread. Barriers to improvement include access to technology, access to expert diabetes health care professionals, and prohibitive insurance costs. Until access can be improved to ensure the technologies are available and usable by those that need them, there are many people with diabetes who are still losing out.

Glucagon in the artificial pancreas: supply and marketing challenges.

The use of glucagon, in conjunction with insulin, in a dual chamber pump (artificial pancreas, AP) is a working goal for multiple companies and researchers. However, capital investment to create, operate, and maintain facilities with sufficient scale to produce enough glucagon to treat millions of patients, at a level of profit that makes it feasible, will be substantial. It can be assumed that the marketplace will expect the daily cost of glucagon (to the consumer) to be similar to the daily cost of insulin. After one subtracts wholesaler and pharmacy markup, there may be very few dollars remaining for the drug company to cover profit, capital expenditures, marketing, burden, and other costs. Without the potential for adequate margins, manufacturers may not be willing to take the risk. Assuming that the projections discussed in this article are in the right ballpark, advance planning for the supply for glucagon needs to start today and not wait for the AP to come to market.