Posterior Heel Pain in Cavovarus Foot: How to Approach It.

When a patient presents with posterior heel pain on the background of a cavovarus foot, there are many different aspects to take into account. The morphology of the foot and the specific cause of the patient's pain lead the practitioner to alter the treatment appropriately. Some patients should only receive physiotherapy, but the majority should receive more invasive treatments, including calcaneal osteotomies or tendon debridement, depending on their particular presentation and pathology. This review examines the various different facets of posterior heel pain that must be dealt with and the most up-to-date treatments for the same.

Managing Cavovarus Feet in Diabetic Patients.

A cavovarus foot is characterized by exacerbated medial longitudinal arch (cavus), hindfoot varus, plantar flexed first ray, forefoot pronation (apparent supination), forefoot adduction, and claw toe deformities. It can be broadly divided as flexible and rigid and further classified based on the neurological and non-neurological causes. Diabetes associated peripheral neuropathy complicates individual bony deformities associated with cavovarus foot with early callus which can breakdown to ulceration rapidly. Based on the disease progression in neurological and non-neurological causes of cavovarus feet in patients with diabetic neuropathy, 3 stages of the disease and its management is described.

Assessing the coronal plane deformity in Charcot Marie Tooth Cavovarus feet using automated 3D measurements.

BACKGROUND: This study assesses the coronal-plane deformities in cavovarus feet secondary to Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) using Weightbearing-CT (WBCT) and semi-automated 3D-segmentation software. METHODS: WBCTs from 30 CMT-cavovarus feet were matched to 30 controls and analysed using semi-automatic 3D-segmentation (Bonelogic, DISIOR). The software used automated cross-section sampling with subsequent straight-line representation of weighted centre points to calculate 3D axes of bones in the hindfoot, midfoot and forefoot. Coronal relationships of these axes were analysed. Supination/pronation of the bones in relation to the ground and within each joint were measured and reported. RESULTS: The most significant deformity in CMT-cavovarus feet occurred at the talonavicular joint (TNJ) with 23 degrees more supination than normal feet (6.4 ± 14.5 versus 29.4 ± 7.0 degrees, p < 0.001). This was countered by relative pronation at the naviculo-cuneiform joints (NCJ) of 7.0 degrees (-36.0 ± 6.6 versus -43.0 ± 5.3 degrees, p < 0.001). Combined hindfoot varus and TNJ supination resulted in an additive supination effect not compensated by NCJ pronation. The cuneiforms in CMT-cavovarus feet were therefore supinated by 19.8 degrees to the ground relative to normal feet (36.0 ± 12.1 versus 16.2 ± 6.8 degrees, p < 0.001). The forefoot-arch and 1st metatarsal-ground angles demonstrated similar supination to the cuneiforms suggesting no further significant rotation occurred distally. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate coronal plane deformity occurs at multiple levels in CMT-cavovarus feet. Majority of the supination arises at the TNJ, and this is partially countered by pronation distally, mainly at the NCJ. An understanding of the location of coronal deformities may help when planning surgical correction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Hallux and Lesser Digits Deformities Associated with Cavus Foot.

It is important to identify the level of the deformity or deformities. It is important to get the limb as close to anatomic alignment as possible. Many levels and multiple procedures may be involved with this reconstruction.

Foot Posture and Plantar Loading With Ankle Bracing.

CONTEXT: Arch height is one important aspect of foot posture. An estimated 20% of the population has pes planus and 20% has pes cavus. These abnormal foot postures can alter lower extremity kinematics and plantar loading and contribute to injury risk. Ankle bracing is commonly used in sport to prevent these injuries, but no researchers have examined the effects of ankle bracing on plantar loading. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of ankle braces on plantar loading during athletic tasks. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. SETTING: Laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: A total of 36 participants (11 men, 25 women; age = 23.1 ± 2.5 years, height = 1.72 ± 0.09 m, mass = 66.3 ± 14.7 kg) were recruited for this study. INTERVENTION(S): Participants completed walking, running, and cutting tasks in 3 bracing conditions: no brace, lace-up ankle-support brace, and semirigid brace. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): We analyzed the plantar-loading variables of contact area, maximum force, and force-time integral for 2 midfoot and 3 forefoot regions and assessed the displacement of the center of pressure. A 3 × 3 mixed-model repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to determine the effects of brace and foot type (α = .05). RESULTS: Foot type affected force measures in the middle (P range = .003-.047) and the medial side of the foot (P range = .004-.04) in all tasks. Brace type affected contact area in the medial midfoot during walking (P = .005) and cutting (P = .01) tasks, maximum force in the medial and lateral midfoot during all tasks (P < .001), and force-time integral in the medial midfoot during all tasks (P < .001). Portions of the center-of-pressure displacement were affected by brace wear in both the medial-lateral and anterior-posterior directions (P range = .001-.049). CONCLUSIONS: Ankle braces can be worn to redistribute plantar loading. Additional research should be done to evaluate their effectiveness in injury prevention.

Pes cavovarus in Charcot-Marie-Tooth compared to the idiopathic cavovarus foot: A preliminary weightbearing CT analysis.

BACKGROUND: Pes cavovarus is a foot deformity that can be idiopathic (I-PC) or acquired secondary to other pathology. Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) is the most common adult cause for acquired pes cavovarus deformity (CMT-PC). The foot morphology of these distinct patient groups has not been previously investigated. The aim of this study was to assess if morphological differences exist between CMT-PC, I-PC and normal feet (controls) using weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of WBCT scans performed between May 2013 and June 2017 was undertaken. WBCT scans from 17 CMT-PC, 17 I-PC and 17 healthy normally-aligned control feet (age-, side-, sex- and body mass index-matched) identified from a prospectively collected database, were analysed. Eight 2-dimensional (2D) and three 3-dimensional (3D) measurements were undertaken for each foot and mean values in the three groups were compared using one-way ANOVA with the Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed between CMT-PC or I-PC and controls (p<0.05). Two-dimensional measurements were similar in CMT-PC and I-PC, except for forefoot arch angle (p=0.04). 3D measurements (foot and ankle offset, calcaneal offset and hindfoot alignment angle) demonstrated that CMT-PC exhibited more severe hindfoot varus malalignment than I-PC (p=0.03, 0.04 and 0.02 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: CMT-related cavovarus and idiopathic cavovarus feet are morphologically different from healthy feet, and CMT feet exhibit increased forefoot supination and hindfoot malalignment compared to idiopathic forms. The use of novel three-dimensional analysis may help highlight subtle structural differences in patients with similar foot morphology but aetiologically different pathology. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Surgical outcomes of cavovarus foot deformity in children with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease.

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) causes disabling cavovarus foot deformity. Orthopaedic surgery is performed in severe cases; however few studies have investigated whether surgery improves health outcomes during childhood. This study investigated the impact of cavovarus surgery on validated physical, functional, parent/self-reported and biomechanical measures in 21 consecutive patients (mean age at surgery 12.5 years, SD 2.7) evaluated before and after surgery (mean duration 15.7 months, SD 5.9), and compared to natural history data from 206 children with CMT. Measures from the CMT Pediatric Scale evaluated foot alignment (Foot Posture Index), ankle flexibility (lunge test), strength (foot dorsiflexion/plantarflexion by hand-held dynamometry), function (balance, long jump, 6-minute walk test) and self-reported symptoms. Quality of life (Child Health Questionnaire) and gait (pressure loading) were also assessed. Foot Posture Index and lunge improved with surgery by 6.0 points (SD 3.2) and 6.1° (SD 7.3) respectively (p< 0.01), and differed to the natural course of the disease (p< 0.005). Self-reported daily trips/falls reduced from 60% to 13% (p = 0.016). Pressure improved beneath the rearfoot and midfoot (p = 0.043). Surgery had no effect on strength, function or quality of life, which generally mirrored the natural course. Cavovarus surgery improved foot alignment, ankle flexibility and self-reported trips/falls in children with CMT.

Foot measures in patients with pes cavus with and without charcot-marie-tooth disease: A pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Pes cavus often signals the presence of Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) in adult patients, although its prevalence in the general population makes it a finding of unclear significance. METHODS: We undertook a pilot double cohort study to investigate the feasibility of comparing preselected bedside and radiographic foot measures in pes cavus patients with and without CMT. RESULTS: A total of 16 CMT and 11 non-CMT patients were recruited. Although no findings consistently met statistical significance, recruitment was highly limiting. CONCLUSIONS: Formalized foot measurement comparisons of CMT and non-CMT pes cavus are feasible. Larger studies will be necessary to determine if there are differences in foot structure based on the presence of a hereditary neuropathy. Muscle Nerve 59:122-125, 2019.

Malalignment and Lateral Ankle Instability: Causes of Failure from the Varus Tibia to the Cavovarus Foot.

A lower leg or hindfoot varus malalignment is a frequently encountered but underestimated cause of chronic ankle instability and ankle arthritis in the long term. When evaluating patients with ankle instability, a high index of clinical suspicion for tibia and hindfoot malalignment and subsequent biomechanics should be maintained. Management of lateral ankle instability in the presence of varus malalignment must comprise a generous indication for accurate hindfoot realignment. In young and active patients, realignment should be combined with formal lateral ligamentous repair.

Is Pes Cavus Alignment Associated With Lisfranc Injuries of the Foot?

BACKGROUND: Lisfranc (tarsometatarsal joint) injuries are relatively rare, accounting for less than 1% of all fractures, and as many as 20% of subtle Lisfranc injuries are missed at the initial patient presentation. An undiagnosed Lisfranc injury can have devastating consequences to the patient. Therefore, any factor that can raise a clinician's index of suspicion to make this diagnosis is potentially important. The cavus foot has been associated with various maladies of the lower extremity, but to our knowledge, it has not been reported to be associated with Lisfranc injury. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: Do patients who experience a low-energy Lisfranc injury have greater talar head coverage and a greater talo-first metatarsal angle than control subjects? METHODS: A retrospective, case-control study was conducted from September 2011 to December 2014 to identify patients diagnosed and treated for a low-energy Lisfranc injury. Twenty-three adult patients with an average age of 42.6 years (SD, 16.3 years) were identified and compared with 61 adult control subjects with an average age of 49.4 years (SD, 14.1 years). Control subjects came from the practice of a fellowship-trained foot and ankle orthopaedic surgeon. Control subjects underwent a history and physical, clinical examination, and diagnostic imaging to confirm that they had no prior foot disorder, no prior foot surgeries, were within 3 years of age of a patient with a Lisfranc injury, and were independent ambulators. Two authors (DSD and JDP) measured the talonavicular and talo-first metatarsal angles on weightbearing AP and lateral radiographs of the foot. The intrarater reliability and interrater reliability for the talo-first metatarsal angle and the talonavicular angle showed high agreement. The intrarater intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) of the talo-first metatarsal angle were 0.94 (95% CI, 0.91-0.96) and 0.93 (95% CI, 0.9-0.96). For the talonavicular angle the ICCs were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.75-0.89) and 0.88 (95% CI, 0.81-0.92) for Raters 1 and 2 respectively. The interrater ICCs were 0.91 (95% CI, 0.69-0.96) for the talo-first metatarsal angle and 0.9 (95% CI, 0.85-0.94) for the talonavicular angle. The patients and controls were compared to determine if the patients who sustained a Lisfranc injury were more likely to have a pes cavus foot alignment. We performed a mixed modeling analysis to control for potential cofounding variables and determine if there was an association of Lisfranc injury with the talo-first metatarsal angle and the talonavicular angle. RESULTS: After controlling for confounding variables such as the effect of the measurement round effect and the effect of the rater, our repeated measures analysis via mixed model showed patients were associated with a higher talo-first metatarsal angle than control subjects (adjusted least square mean for patients = 3.05; for controls = -2.65; mean difference, 5.7; p = 0.001). Repeated measures analysis via mixed model showed that patients also were associated with a more positive talonavicular angle than control subjects (adjusted least square mean for patients = -4.83, for controls = -11; mean difference, 6.17; p = 0.002). Patients with Lisfranc injuries had a higher mean talo-first metatarsal angle than did control subjects (1.9° ± 7.9° versus -2.2° ± 7.3°; mean difference, 4.1°; 95% CI, -7.7° to -0.5°; p = 0.028), and less talar uncovering (-4.2° ± 9.7° versus -11° ± 8°; mean difference, 6.7°; 95% CI, -6.7° to -10.8°; p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found that cavus midfoot alignment was more prevalent among patients with Lisfranc injuries than among individuals with no foot injury or disorder. Although this does not suggest that cavus alignment causes or predisposes patients to this injury, we believe the finding is important because this provides a radiographic parameter that clinicians can use to raise their index of suspicion for a Lisfranc injury and aggressively pursue this diagnosis. Future studies would benefit from obtaining contralateral foot imaging at the time of injury in all patients with Lisfranc injury or prospectively following patients with foot imaging and recording the incidence of future foot injury. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, prognostic study.