Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Periodontol ; 88(11): 1153-1162, 2017 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28548884

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing dental treatment have an uncertain understanding about dental implant therapy and its complications. Therefore, the aims of this study assess the following: 1) level of knowledge, awareness, and attitudes about peri-implantitis; 2) information provided by dentists/specialists who perform the treatment; and 3) perceptions, level of satisfaction, and impact on patient quality of life (QoL). METHODS: Patients with implant restorative therapy currently undergoing peri-implant maintenance therapy were recruited. Participants completed an anonymous questionnaire that included general aspects of prognosis, including the following: 1) peri-implantitis; 2) etiology; 3) awareness; 4) attitudes; 5) treatment; 6) prevention; 7) risk factors; 8) quality of information; 9) level of patient satisfaction; and 10) QoL. Associations among questionnaire data were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 411 implants were included from 135 patients with implants. Frequency of peri-implantitis in the survey was 17.8% at the participant level, with 70% of them reporting high level of post-surgical satisfaction. Worry and concern were frequent findings among patients with peri-implantitis (64%), and 32% reported that living with the disease was terrible. The vast majority of patients (74.1%) did not have knowledge about peri-implant pathology. Patients with peri-implantitis showed statistically significantly better understanding of implant therapy (P <0.001) and also higher average concern (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Patients generally have a poor understanding and perception of peri-implantitis and its impact. QoL was impaired by the presence of peri-implantitis with high level of concern and low level of therapeutic satisfaction. Therefore, it is important to develop standardized information brochures to educate patients on risk factors and indicators of the disease to assist in the prevention of peri-implantitis.


Assuntos
Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde , Peri-Implantite/psicologia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Atitude Frente a Saúde , Implantação Dentária Endóssea/efeitos adversos , Implantação Dentária Endóssea/psicologia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Satisfação do Paciente , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem
2.
Clin Oral Implants Res ; 28(4): 437-442, 2017 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26918305

RESUMO

AIM: The aim was to explore patients' reactions on being diagnosed with peri-implantitis, their opinions on dental implant therapy and expectations on treatment of the disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study subjects were patients referred to a specialist clinic for treatment of peri-implantitis. The method of grounded theory was used in collecting and analyzing data. Audiotaped, thematized open-ended interviews were conducted. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and consecutively analyzed in hierarchical coding processes that continued until saturation was met (n = 15). RESULTS: In the analysis, a conceptual model was generated that illuminated a process among patients. From having very high initial expectations on dental implant therapy as a permanent solution of oral/dental problems, patients realized that dental implants, such as teeth, require continuous care and that there is no guarantee for that dental implants provides a treatment alternative free from future problems. The core concept of the model "altered expectations on dental implant therapy" was composed of three main categories: "initial expectations on dental implant therapy and living with dental implants", "being referred to periodontist and become diagnosed with peri-implantitis" and "investing again in an expensive therapy with no guarantee for the future". CONCLUSION: Patients may have unrealistically high expectations on dental implant therapy. The results illuminate the importance of patient-centered communication in dentistry and that treatment decisions should be based not only on professional expertise but also on expectations, abilities, wishes and life circumstances of the individual patient.


Assuntos
Implantação Dentária/psicologia , Satisfação do Paciente , Peri-Implantite/psicologia , Encaminhamento e Consulta , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Entrevista Psicológica , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Higiene Bucal/psicologia , Educação de Pacientes como Assunto , Peri-Implantite/diagnóstico , Peri-Implantite/terapia
3.
J Dent Res ; 95(5): 506-14, 2016 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26826109

RESUMO

The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to study the effectiveness of psychological interventions in adults and adolescents with poor oral health. The review follows the PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews. The PICO format (population, intervention, comparison, and outcome) was used to define eligible studies. The populations were adults or adolescents (≥13 y of age and independent of others) with poor oral health (defined as dental caries, periodontal disease, and/or peri-implantitis). The interventions were psychological and/or behavioral models and theories, in comparison with traditional oral health education/information. The primary outcomes were dental caries, periodontitis, gingivitis, and peri-implantitis. Secondary outcomes were dental plaque, oral health-related behavior, health-related quality of life, health beliefs and attitudes, self-perceived oral health, and complications/risks. The systematic literature search identified 846 articles in December 2013 and 378 articles in July 2015. In total, 11 articles on 9 randomized controlled trials were found to meet the inclusion criteria. These reported on adults with periodontal disease, and several used motivational interviewing (MI) as their mode of intervention. The CONSORT guidelines and the GRADE approach were used for study appraisal and rating of evidence. The meta-analysis showed no statistically significant differences in gingivitis or plaque presence. In addition, a meta-analysis on MI compared with education/information found no statistically significant differences in gingivitis presence. Only 1 meta-analysis-on psychological interventions versus education/information regarding the plaque index-showed a small but statistically significant difference. There were also statistically significant differences reported in favor of psychological interventions in oral health behavior and self-efficacy in toothbrushing. However, the clinical relevance of these differences is difficult to estimate. The certainty of evidence was low. Future research needs to address several methodological issues and not only study adults with periodontal disease but also adolescents and patients with dental caries and peri-implantitis.


Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde , Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde , Saúde Bucal , Adolescente , Adulto , Informação de Saúde ao Consumidor , Aconselhamento , Cárie Dentária/psicologia , Educação em Saúde Bucal , Humanos , Peri-Implantite/psicologia , Doenças Periodontais/psicologia , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA