Ultrasound for diagnosis of postpartum retained products of conception-How accurate we are?

OBJECTIVE: Postpartum retained products of conception (RPOC) can cause short- and long-term complications. Diagnosis is based on ultrasound examination and treated with hysteroscopy. This study evaluated the size of RPOC that can be related to a positive pathology result for residua. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included women who underwent hysteroscopy for postpartum RPOC diagnosed by ultrasound, 4/2014-4/2022. Demographics, intrapartum, sonographic, intraoperative, and post-operative data were retrieved. We generated a ROC curve and found 7 mm was the statistically sonographic value for positive pathology for RPOC. Data between women with sonographic RPOC ≤ 7 mm and > 7 mm were compared. Positive and negative predictive values were calculated for RPOC pathology proved which was measured by ultrasound. RESULTS: Among 212 patients who underwent hysteroscopy due to suspected RPOC on ultrasound, 20 (9.4%) women had residua ≤ 7 mm and 192 (90.6%) had residua > 7 mm. The most common complaint was vaginal bleeding in 128 cases (60.4%); more so in the residua > 7 mm group (62.5% vs. 40%, p = .05). Among women with residua ≤ 7 mm, the interval from delivery to hysteroscopy was longer (117.4 ± 74.7 days vs. 78.8 ± 68.8 days, respectively; p = .02). Positive pathology was more frequent when residua was > 7 mm. PPV for diagnosis of 7 mm RPOC during pathology examination was 75.3% and NPV 50%. CONCLUSIONS: Sonographic evaluation after RPOC showed that residua > 7 mm was statistically correlated with positive RPOC in pathology and PPV of 75% and NPV of 50%. Due to the high NPV and low complication rate of office hysteroscopy, clinicians should consider intervention when any RPOC are measured during sonographic examination to reduce known long-term complications.

Retained products of conception - a retrospective analysis of 200 cases of surgical procedures for the diagnosis of residua postpartum.

OBJECTIVES: Postpartum retained products of conception are a relatively rare diagnosis occurring in approximately 1% of cases after spontaneous deliveries and abortions. The most common clinical signs are bleeding and abdominal pain. The diagnosis is based on clinical signs and ultrasound examination. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 200 surgical procedures for the diagnosis of residua postpartum obtained in 64 months. We correlated the method and accuracy of diagnosis with definitive histological findings. RESULTS: During 64 months, we performed 23 412 deliveries. The frequency of procedures for diagnosis of retained products of conception (RPOC) was 0.85%. Most (73.5%) of the D&C were performed within six weeks of delivery. Histologically, the correct diagnosis was confirmed in 62% (chorion + amniotic envelope). There was interestingly lower concordance of histologically confirmed RPOC in post-CS patients (only 42%). In women after spontaneous delivery of the placenta, the diagnosis of RPOC was confirmed by histological correlate in 63%, and the highest concordance occurred in women after manual removal of the placenta in 75%. CONCLUSIONS: Concordance with histological findings of chorion or amnion was seen in 62% of cases; this means that the incidence rate in our study was around 0.53%. The lowest concordance is after CS deliveries, 42%. D&C for RPOC should be performed after adequate clinical evaluation and in the knowledge of 38% false positivity. There is certainly more space for a conservative approach under appropriate clinical conditions, especially in patients after CS.

Medical management of retained products of conception: A prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVE(S): To measure the success rate of primary medical therapy in managing retained products of conception (RPOC) in women with secondary postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) and to identify factors associated with need for surgical management. STUDY DESIGN: Postpartum patients presenting to a tertiary women's hospital Emergency Department between July 2020 and December 2022 with secondary PPH and evidence of RPOC on ultrasound were recruited. Clinical information relating to the presentation was collected prospectively. Antenatal and intrapartum data were collected from medical record and Birthing Outcome System database review. The primary outcome was the success of medical management for RPOC, defined by the implementation of medical or expectant management without subsequent need for surgical intervention. RESULTS: Forty-one patients with RPOC underwent primary medical or expectant management. Twelve patients (29%) were managed successfully with medical management, while twenty-nine (71%) proceeded to surgical management. Medical management involved antibiotics (n = 37, 90%), prostaglandin E1 analogue (n = 14, 34%) and other uterotonics (n = 3, 7%). A greater endometrial thickness on ultrasound was significantly associated with a requirement for secondary surgical intervention (p < 0.05). There was an association approaching statistical significance between a higher sonographic volume of RPOC and the failure of medical management (p = 0.07). There was no statistically significant association between the mode of delivery or the number of days postpartum with the success of medical management. CONCLUSION(S): For patients presenting with secondary PPH and sonographic RPOC, over two thirds required surgical management. Increased endometrial thickness was associated with an increased requirement for surgical management.

Placental cord drainage and its outcomes at third stage of labor: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The third stage of labor begins with the baby's birth and ends with the expulsion of the placenta and embryonic membranes. The prolongation of the third stage of labor, placental retention, subsequent issues such as postpartum hemorrhage, and manual removal of the placenta have adverse outcomes, which eventually affect the positive experience of delivery. The present study aimed to assess the effect of placental cord drainage on the duration of the third stage of labor and to clarify its effects on postpartum hemorrhage, retained placenta, and incidence of manual removal of placenta. METHODS: This study was a parallel-group randomized trial. Four hundred women in the third stage of labor after vaginal delivery were randomized into the drainage (placenta drainage, n = 200) and the control groups (no placenta drainage, n = 200). In both groups, the third stage of labor was performed with the active method, and the placenta was removed using the Brandt-Andrews maneuver with maternal pushing. The duration of the third stage was compared between the two groups as the primary outcome. Also, the incidence of postpartum hemorrhage, retained placenta, and manual removal of placenta was compared. RESULTS: In all, 175 women in the drainage group and 165 women in the control group were included in the analysis. The third stage of labor was significantly shorter after placental cord drainage. The mean duration of the third stage was 7.09 ± 1.01 minutes in the drainage group, and it was 10.43 ± 3.20 minutes in the control group (P < 0.001). Postpartum hemorrhage, retained placenta, and incidence of manual removal of placenta in the drainage group was significantly less than in the control group. CONCLUSION: Placental cord drainage is a simple and non-invasive method of reducing the duration of the third stage of labor. This method does not increase postpartum complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: IRCT2014041917341N1 , retrospectively registered at 15. 10. 2017.

Office Operative Hysteroscopy for the Management of Retained Products of Conception.

The aim of this study was to compare office to conventional operative hysteroscopy for the treatment of retained products of conception (RPOC). This retrospective cohort study included all women who underwent hysteroscopy due to RPOC between January 2018 and December 2019, in a single tertiary medical care center. Exclusion criteria for hysteroscopy included the following: (1) proximity to delivery (up to 3 weeks); (2) hemodynamic instability; (3) active massive bleeding; and (4) genital tract infection. See-and-treat hysteroscopy (study group) outcomes were compared to operative hysteroscopy (controls). Data were collected from women's medical records. Primary outcome was defined as successful removal of all suspected RPOC with no need for additional intervention. Data are presented as median and interquartile range. During the study period, 222 women underwent hysteroscopy due to RPOC. Of them, 138 (62%) and 84 (38%) underwent see-and-treat and operative hysteroscopy, respectively. Symptomatic women were more commonly referred to operative hysteroscopy (60 (71%) vs. 54 (39%); p = 0.001). Maximal diameter of the suspected finding was smaller both by ultrasound examination (13 (10-18) vs. 18 (13-32) mm; p = 0.001) and by surgeon estimation during diagnostic hysteroscopy (12 (8-20) vs. 20 (14-30) mm; p = 0.001), in the see-and-treat compared to the operative hysteroscopy group, respectively. While comparing success rate between groups, no difference was observed. Sub-analysis by the maximal diameter of RPOC findings revealed that see-and-treat success rate is reduced as the RPOC is larger. Success rate was high and comparable to operative hysteroscopy for findings ≤ 2 cm (102/117 (87%) vs. 49/54 (91%); p = 0.79). Nevertheless, for RPOC > 2 cm, success was significantly more frequent in the operative hysteroscopy group (28/30 (93%) vs. 9/16 (57%); p = 0.002). This finding was supported by logistic regression analysis that found maximal diameter of RPOC as the only parameter associated with success rate (B = 0.96; p = 0.03). Office operative hysteroscopy is a feasible treatment option for the removal of RPOC when maximal diameter is taken under consideration due to its association to success rate.Clinical trial registration: The study protocol was approved by the "Sheba Medical Center" Review Board (ID 5200-18 SMC) on June 24, 2018.

The role of ultrasound imaging in the management of partial placental retention after third trimester livebirth.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of different ultrasound signs in the management and the role of ultrasound guidance in the surgical evacuation of partial placental tissue retention. METHODS: This is an observational cohort study and retrospective case assessment of 82 patients with clinical symptoms of partial placental retention following a third trimester singleton livebirth between January 2013 and May 2019. The ultrasound signs were recorded using a standardized protocol and the outcome of the management strategy and the use of ultrasound guidance during any surgical procedure was evaluated. RESULTS: Out of the 64 patients who had a vaginal birth, 25 (39.1%) had a manual removal of the placenta at delivery. Fifteen patients were confirmed as not having retained placental tissue and did not require further treatment. Four patients were referred after failed surgical management and four after failed conservative management. All surgical procedures were vacuum aspiration and forceps removal under continuous ultrasound guidance. A significantly lower gestational age at delivery (p < .05), shorter interval between delivery and ultrasound diagnosis (p < .05) and lower number of patients presenting with heavy bleeding was found in the conservative compared to the surgical management subgroups (p < .05). The incidence of feeding vessels was significantly (p < .05) higher in the surgical than in the conservative management subgroups and associated with increased myometrial vascularity. Six patients developed intra-uterine adhesions. In four of these cases, ultrasound examination showed a hyperechoic mass surrounded by normal myometrial vascularity and no feeding vessel. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound imaging accurately differentiated between patient with and without partial placental retention after third trimester livebirth. Ultrasound-guided vacuum aspiration is safe and efficient in these cases.

Managing patients with suspected postpartum retained products of conception using a novel sonographic classification.

BACKGROUND: Suspicion of retained products of conception (RPOC) often arises after delivery and still poses a diagnostic and management challenge. PURPOSE: To prospectively evaluate a sonographic classification for the management of patients with suspected RPOC after delivery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Based on grayscale and Doppler ultrasound parameters, patients were classified into high, moderate, or low probability of RPOC. For the low and moderate probability groups, an ultrasound follow-up at the end of the puerperium was recommended. For the high probability group, a follow-up examination was conducted 10-14 days after the first ultrasound, and patients with persistent high probability findings were referred for surgical intervention. RESULTS: The sample was composed of 215 patients at risk of RPOC. Of these, 100, 93, and 22 patients were classified as having a low, moderate, or high probability of RPOC, respectively. Rates of RPOC were 55%, 2%, and 2% in the high, moderate, and low probability categories, respectively. When the categorization was based on the most recent ultrasound obtained during the puerperium, the adjusted RPOC prevalence rates were 71% in the high, 6% in the moderate, and 0% in the low probability groups. CONCLUSION: This study confirms the effectiveness of our sonographic classification for managing patients with suspected RPOC after delivery. In all three categories, it is recommended to adhere to a conservative management protocol in clinically stable women until the end of the puerperium. This approach provides good predictability for RPOC and can reduce unnecessary surgical interventions.

Serum ß-HCG Level in Women Diagnosed as Having Retained Products Of Conception: A Prospective Cohort Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Retained products of conception (RPOC) may occur after delivery or abortion, often necessitating operative hysteroscopy for their removal. A preoperative diagnosis of RPOC by ultrasonography is not always accurate and may lead to unnecessary surgical procedures. We sought to evaluate whether serum level of ß-human chorionic gonadotropin (ß-HCG) may aid in the preoperative diagnosis of RPOC. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. SETTING: Gynecology department in a university affiliated medical center. PATIENTS: Women undergoing operative hysteroscopy for removal of RPOC between December 2019 and January 2021. INTERVENTIONS: Operative hysteroscopy for RPOC removal. Serum ß-HCG levels were obtained on the day of surgery, and level ≥5.0 mIU/mL was considered positive. All operative specimens were evaluated by pathology for the presence of trophoblastic tissue. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 105 women recruited to the study, the operative pathology showed trophoblastic tissue in 81 cases (77.1%), and they were included in the data analysis. The ß-HCG level was positive in 16 of those 81 cases (19.8%). Positive ß-HCG level was significantly associated with RPOC after an abortion (surgical or medical) compared with RPOC after delivery. In addition, the mean RPOC mass was larger in the ß-HCG-positive group than the ß-HCG-negative group (29.1 ± 9.5 mm vs 23.8 ± 8.9 mm, respectively, p = .004), and the interval from termination of pregnancy to surgery was shorter (4.8 ± 1.7 weeks vs 7.5 ± 2.1 weeks, respectively, p <.001). Relatively high ß-HCG level (352 mIU/mL and 3561 mIU/mL) were found in 2 cases in which the RPOC mass was implanted on a previous cesarean section scar. CONCLUSION: ß-HCG level is noncontributory to the preoperative diagnosis of RPOC.

The RPOC long axis is a simple indicator for predicting the need of invasive strategies for secondary postpartum hemorrhage in either post-abortion or post-partum women: a retrospective case control study.

BACKGROUND: The retained products of conception (RPOC) and related conditions (RPOC-ARC) are the main cause of secondary postpartum hemorrhage (sPPH), but there is no clear consensus for their management. The purpose of this study was to characterize those RPOC-ARC that require invasive treatment and those that could be managed more conservatively. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 96 cases of RPOC-ARC that occurred after miscarriage, abortion, or delivery at a gestational age between 12 and 42 completed weeks, that were managed within our institution from May 2015 to August 2020. We reviewed the associations between the occurrence of sPPH requiring invasive treatment with clinical factors such as the maternal background and the characteristics of the lesions. RESULTS: The range of gestational age at delivery in our study was 12-21 weeks in 61 cases, 22-36 in 5, and 37 or later in 30. Among them, nine cases required invasive procedures for treatment. The onset of sPPH was within one month of delivery in all but two cases, with a median of 24 days (range 9-47). We found significant differences between requirements for invasive versus non-invasive strategies according to gestational age at delivery, assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy, amount of blood loss at delivery, and the long axis of the RPOC-ARC lesion (p = 0.028, p = 0.009, p = 0.004, and p = 0.002, respectively). Multivariate analysis showed that only the long axis of the lesion showed a significant difference (p = 0.029). The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve for predicting the need for invasive strategies using the long axis of the lesion showed that with a cutoff of 4.4 cm, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) was 87.5, 90.0, 43.8, and 98.7%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The long axis of the RPOC-ARC is a simple indicator for predicting which sPPH will require invasive procedures, which use is rare in cases with lesions less than 4.4 cm or those occurring after the first postpartum month. Conservative management should be considered in such cases.

Reproductive and obstetric outcomes following operative hysteroscopy for treatment of retained products of conception.

BACKGROUND: Retained products of conception following delivery or early pregnancy failure are often treated by operative hysteroscopy. We aimed to evaluate reproductive and obstetric outcomes following operative hysteroscopy for treatment of retained products of conception. We also investigated the effect of time interval between operative hysteroscopy and pregnancy on these outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study conducted at the gynecology department of a tertiary teaching hospital between January 2012 and December 2016. Included were women who underwent operative hysteroscopy for treatment of retained products of conception and became pregnant following the procedure. Reproductive and obstetric data were retrieved from electronic medical records and by telephone questionnaire. The effect of time interval between operative hysteroscopy and pregnancy on reproductive outcomes was also evaluated by comparing women who conceived 6 months or less and women who conceived more than 6 months following surgery. RESULTS: Seventy-nine women who underwent operative hysteroscopy for treatment of retained products of conception and who conceived later were included. Mean time from women's attempt to conceive to conception was 4.6 (SD=6.4) months. Conception rate was 84.8% at 6 months and reached 92.4% at 12 months postsurgery. Miscarriage rate for the consecutive pregnancy following hysteroscopy was 15.2% and delivery rate was 84.8%. Two cases of obstetric complications including one case of retained placenta and one case of post-partum hemorrhage were noted. Time interval between operative hysteroscopy and pregnancy did not affect reproductive or obstetric outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Women treated by operative hysteroscopy for retained products of conception have no negative reproductive and obstetric outcomes. Time interval between the procedure and pregnancy has no effect on these outcomes.

Surgical and Reproductive Outcomes after Hysteroscopic Removal of Retained Products of Conception: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of hysteroscopy for retained products of conception (RPOC) removal on surgical and reproductive outcomes. DATA SOURCES: Electronic databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov, SciELO, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials at the Cochrane Library) were searched from inception to March 2020. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines were followed. Medical Subject Headings terms and text words such as "retained products of conception," "placental remnants," "placenta," and "hysteroscopy" were used for the identification of relevant studies. We included observational and randomized studies that analyzed surgical and/or reproductive outcomes of women who underwent hysteroscopic removal of RPOC. The primary outcome was the complete resection rate after 1 procedure. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: Twenty out of 245 studies were applicable, with data provided for 2112 women. The pooled complete resection rate was 91% (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.96). The incomplete resection rate evaluated was 7% (95% CI, 0.03-0.14), with a complication rate of 2% (95% CI, 0.00-0.04). Out of 1478 procedures, only 12 cases (0.8%) of postsurgical intrauterine adhesions were reported. Regarding post-therapy fecundity, women attempting postoperative conception had a clinical pregnancy rate of 87% (95% CI, 0.75-0.95), with a live birth rate of 71% (95% CI, 0.60-0.81) and a pregnancy loss rate of 9% (95% CI, 0.06-0.12). CONCLUSION: Hysteroscopy has a high rate of completely removing RPOC in a single surgical step, with low complication rates. Subsequent fecundity seems reassuring, with appropriate clinical pregnancy and live birth rates. However, standardization of approach and comparative trials of different hysteroscopic approaches are needed.

Association Between First-Trimester Bleeding and Retained Placenta Requiring Dilatation and Curettage.

OBJECTIVE: Early subchorionic hemorrhage may lead to a disruption in the placental-uterine matrix, which may result in an adherence of the placenta to the endometrium. We evaluated the effect of a first-trimester bleed on the need for a post-vaginal delivery dilatation and curettage (D&C) for removal of retained placenta. METHODS: We conducted a case-control study at a tertiary care centre between 2012 and 2016. Patients identified through medical records as having required a post-vaginal delivery D&C for retained placenta were considered cases and were matched 1:5 with patients delivering vaginally within 1 week who did not require a D&C. History of first-trimester bleeding and subchorionic hemorrhage were identified through chart review. Conditional logistic regression analyses estimated the effect of a first-trimester bleed on the requirement for D&C for retained placenta. Models were adjusted for maternal age and previous uterine surgery. RESULTS: There were 68 cases of retained placenta requiring D&C, for an estimated 3 in 1000 deliveries. Patients requiring D&C were slightly older than controls but were otherwise comparable with respect to baseline demographic characteristics. In adjusted analyses, patients who required a postpartum D&C were more likely than controls to have had a first-trimester bleed at 11.8% and 0.6%, respectively (OR 25.3; 95% CI 4.7-135.4, P < 0.001). Postpartum D&C for retained placenta was associated with postpartum hemorrhage, need for blood transfusion, and manual removal of placenta. CONCLUSION: First-trimester bleeding should be considered a high-risk determinant for post-vaginal delivery D&C for retained placenta and for severe postpartum hemorrhage.

Retained Products of Conception Fed by the Inferior Mesenteric Artery: A Case Report.

Retained products of conception (RPOC) refer to the persistence of placental or fetal tissue in the uterus following delivery or miscarriage. RPOC may cause massive postpartum or post-abortion hemorrhage. Arterial embolization (AE) is an effective choice of management for postpartum hemorrhage including RPOC. We report a case of hemorrhagic RPOC, in which uterine artery embolization with transcervical resection did not achieve hemostasis, and laparotomy with uterine compression sutures was subsequently required. The RPOC was apparently fed by an aberrant branch derived from the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA). AE of IMA was not performed because of possible necrosis of the descending colon and rectum. A physician should be aware that AE is not an all-encompassing hemostatic technique for postpartum bleeding, such as with RPOC, and should keep alternatives in mind.

Does the time interval between the diagnosis to hysteroscopic evacuation of retained products of conception affect reproductive outcome?

BACKGROUND: Retained products of conception (RPOC) refer to the presence of placental and/or fetal tissue in the uterus following delivery, miscarriage, or termination of pregnancy. The presence of such tissue might lead to complications, which might be the culprit of secondary infertility. Although some studies have considered the management of symptomatic RPOC, there are no data regarding the management of asymptomatic, incidentally diagnosed RPOC, nor the optimal time for surgical intervention required to prevent adverse reproductive outcomes. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine whether the time interval between the pregnancy termination to surgical evacuation of RPOC influences the reproductive outcome in asymptomatic women. DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study, which includes women who were admitted for an elective procedure in the gynecology day-care clinic due to suspected RPOC. The diagnosis was made during patients' routine examination following either delivery or miscarriage between the years 2010 and 2018. SETTING: Records of women who were admitted to the day-care gynecology department during the years 2010-2018 for hysteroscopic removal of RPOC. PATIENTS: The patients were divided into three groups, according to the time from desired pregnancy to conception following the procedure (> 6; 3-6 and < 3 months). Data regarding obstetric history prior to the procedure was retrieved from patients' clinical files, while data concerning reproductive outcome following the procedure was obtained by telephone questionnaires. INTERVENTION: Data regarding obstetric history prior to the procedure was retrieved from patients' clinical files, while data concerning reproductive outcome following the procedure was obtained by telephone questionnaires. MEASUREMENTS: 75 patients whose reproductive outcome could be analyzed were included in the study. The time interval between the end of pregnancy and surgical intervention was analyzed as a continuous variable and was compared between the three groups, together with parameters such as age and obstetric history. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The main finding of the present study is that the time interval between the end of pregnancy and surgical evacuation of the asymptomatic, incidentally diagnosed RPOC, has no significant implication on patients' reproductive outcomes.

Risk factors for third stage placental complications among primigravid women.

INTRODUCTION: Third stage placental complications (TSPC) including partially or complete retained placenta, are a common obstetric complication. Previous studies have underlined risk factors for TSPC in heterogenous populations of women, whereas data regarding primigravid term women are scarce. We aimed to identify the factors associated with TSPC in this subset of parturients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study including all primigravid women who delivered vaginally a term, live-singleton neonate between 2011 and 2019. Women who underwent revision of the uterine cavity due to TSPC were compared with those who did not. Univariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed in order to identify the risk factors for TSPC. RESULTS: Overall, 16,867 deliveries met the study inclusion criteria. Of those, 1097 (6.5%) deliveries were complicated by TSPC. Women with TSPC were older (p < 0.001) and with a higher proportion of lateral and fundal placental location (p < 0.001). In a multivariate regression analysis, the following factors were positively independently associated with TSPC: maternal age (aOR [95% CI] 1.26 (1.17-1.36), p < 0.001), the use of assisted reproduction technologies (aOR [95% CI] 1.26 (1.06-1.49), p = 0.007), preeclampsia (aOR [95% CI] 3.39 (1.89-6.10), p < 0.001), thrombocytopenia (aOR [95% CI] 1.83 (1.34-2.48), p < 0.001), oxytocin administration (aOR [95% CI] 1.29 (1.12-1.48), p < 0.001) and longer second stage duration (aOR [95% CI] 1.03 (1.003-1.05), p = 0.02). Fetal male gender was negatively associated with TSPC (aOR [95% CI] 0.80 (0.70-0.92), p = 0.002). DISCUSSION: We have identified multiple independent risk factors for TSPC among primigravid women. This information can aid in patient counseling and delivery management in these subset of parturients.

Anaesthesia/analgesia for manual removal of retained placenta.

BACKGROUND: As a retained placenta is a potential life-threatening obstetrical complication, effective and timely management is important. The estimated mortality rates from a retained placenta in developing countries range from 3% to 9%. One possible factor contributing to the high mortality rates is a delay in initiating manual removal of the placenta. Effective anaesthesia or analgesia during this procedure will provide adequate uterine relaxation and pain control, enabling it to be carried out effectively. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of general, regional, and local anaesthesia or analgesia during manual removal of a retained placenta. SEARCH METHODS: We searched Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth's Trials Register, ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization's International Clinical Trials Registry Platform to 30 September 2019, and reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We sought randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi-randomised controlled trials, and cluster-randomised trials that compared different methods of preoperative or intraoperative anaesthetic or analgesic, administered during the manual removal of a retained placenta. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed the study reports for inclusion, and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. We followed standard Cochrane methodology. MAIN RESULTS: We identified only one randomised controlled trial (N = 30 women) that evaluated the effect of paracervical block on women undergoing manual removal of a retained placenta compared with intravenous pethidine and diazepam. The study was conducted in a hospital in Papua New Guinea. The study was at high risk of bias of performance bias and detection bias, low risk of attrition bias, and an unclear risk of selection bias, reporting bias, and other bias. The included study did not measure this review's primary outcomes of pain intensity and adverse events. The study reported that there were no women, in either group, who experienced an estimated postpartum blood loss of more than 500 mL. We are uncertain about the providers' satisfaction with the procedure, defined as their perception of achieving good pain relief during the procedure (risk ratio (RR) 1.50, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71 to 3.16, one study, 30 women; very low quality evidence). We are also uncertain about the women's satisfaction with the procedure, defined as their perception of achieving good pain relief during the procedure (RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.49 to 1.37; one study, 30 women; very low quality evidence). The included study did not report on any of our other outcomes of interest. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence from one small study to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of anaesthesia or analgesia during the manual removal of a retained placenta. The quality of the available evidence was very low. We downgraded based on issues of limitations in study design (risk of bias) and imprecision (single study with small sample size, few or no events, and wide confidence intervals). There is a need for well-designed, multi-centre, randomised, controlled trials to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different types of anaesthesia and analgesia during manual removal of a retained placenta. These studies could report on the important outcomes outlined in this review.

Is Hysteroscopy the Best Surgical Approach for Removal of Retained Products of Conception Following Surgical Termination of Pregnancy?

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the rates of intrauterine adhesion following hysteroscopy for removal of RPOC associated with surgical termination of pregnancy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all cases of removal by hysteroscopy of RPOC associated with surgical termination of pregnancy carried out at the Yitzhak Shamir (Assaf Harofe) Medical Center from January 2013 to December 2018. The rates of postoperative intrauterine adhesion were assessed by follow-up hysteroscopy. RESULTS: Our study involved 85 cases of removal by hysteroscopy of RPOC associated with surgical termination of pregnancy. The mean size of the RPOC was 1.9 ± 0.9 cm, and the mean time from termination of pregnancy to hysteroscopy was 1.5 ± 0.9 months. Two patients (2.4%) were readmitted for postoperative complications (fever). Postoperative follow-up information was available for 49 cases (57.6%). A total of 47 of these women had a normal uterine cavity (95.9%) while 2 women (4.1%) were diagnosed with mild intrauterine adhesions. CONCLUSIONS: Hysteroscopy for removal of RPOC following surgical termination of pregnancy is associated with low rates of postoperative intrauterine adhesions. Additional studies may determine whether this is the procedure of choice in these cases.

Routine ultrasonographic and hysteroscopic evaluations of women undergoing postpartum manual removal of placenta: a retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to assess the rates of retained products of conception (RPOC) after routine postpartum evaluation of patients who underwent post-delivery manual uterine revision due to retained placenta. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study of 599 consecutive women who underwent manual removal of placenta during 2010-2018. Group A comprised 465 women who underwent postpartum symptom-based evaluation (2010-2016). Group B comprised 134 women who were routinely evaluated by ultrasound and subsequently by hysteroscopic examination 6 weeks after delivery (2016-2018). RESULTS: The rates of abnormal postpartum bleeding were similar between groups A and B (12% and 13%, respectively, p = 0.72%). A significantly smaller proportion of women underwent hysteroscopy in group A than group B (12% vs. 37%, p < 0.05). The rate of persistent RPOC confirmed by hysteroscopy was significantly lower in group A than group B (9.7% vs. 23%, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Among patients who underwent post-delivery manual removal of placenta, a threefold higher rate of RPOC was discovered by routine elective evaluation than by evaluating only symptomatic patients. Future studies may show whether this approach translates to an effect on fertility.

Reproductive and Obstetric Outcomes After Hysteroscopic Removal of Retained Products of Conception.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the reproductive outcomes in women treated for retained products of conception (RPOC) by hysteroscopy (morcellation vs loop resection). DESIGN: Cohort study. SETTING: A teaching and university hospital. PATIENTS: Patients included in a previous randomized controlled trial on hysteroscopic removal of RPOC comparing morcellation (n = 46) with loop resection (n = 40). INTERVENTIONS: Hysteroscopic morcellation versus loop resection. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome measures were live birth and pregnancy complications (including abnormal placentation [placenta accreta/increta/percreta], placenta previa, vasa previa, retained placenta after delivery or incomplete expulsion with the need for manual removal or curettage, and RPOC), uterine rupture, and other complications (blood loss, preterm labor, preterm premature rupture of membranes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, and intrauterine growth restriction). The live birth rate was 88.9% in the morcellation group and 68.2% in the loop resection group (p = .09). Uterine rupture occurred in 1 patient in the morcellation group (4.2%) (p = 1.00). Placental complications were found in 20.8% and 22.2% of the hysteroscopic morcellation and loop resection groups, respectively (p = .33), and other pregnancy complications were seen in 33.3% and 16.6% of the 2 groups (p = .33). The secondary outcome was time to pregnancy. The median time to pregnancy was 14 weeks (interquartile range [IQR], 5-33 weeks) in the morcellation group and 15 weeks (IQR, 6-37 weeks) in the loop resection group (p = .96). CONCLUSION: Hysteroscopic removal of RPOC seems to have no detrimental effect on reproductive outcome and no significant effect on pregnancy rate.

Office hysteroscopy in removing retained products of conception - a highly successful approach with minimal complications.

Data of 101 patients with retained products of conception (RPOC), treated with office hysteroscopy (OH) from 2012 to 2015 at the University Medical Centre Ljubljana were analysed. Patients with >30 mm RPOC thickness or strong vascularisation on ultrasound (US) were excluded. Procedures were successfully completed in 94/101 (93%). Mean duration was 18 min (4-60), patient pain estimation with VAS was 2.3 (0-8). No intraoperative complications > Grade II according to Clavien-Dindo classification occurred. Uncompleted cases were safely referred to procedures in general anaesthesia. Follow-up after one month was performed in 78/101 (77%) patients with OH (69) or US (9). Only three patients reported endometritis, three cases of intrauterine adhesions were related to curettage or pre-existing adhesions. We compared preoperative findings of completed and uncompleted cases. Larger size of RPOC and the presence of irregular tissue-myometrial border on US was statistically significantly higher in uncompleted OH (p<.05); mild vascularisation and ß-hCG levels up to 80 U/L did not affect the outcome.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? In the last three decades research has focussed on comparing hysteroscopic resection (HR) to traditional dilation and curettage in removing retained products of conception (RPOC). Office hysteroscopy (OH) without hospitalisation or general anaesthesia enables women to return to their daily routine immediately (especially desired by breastfeeding mothers) and is used where available, yet there is little published data to evaluate its role in the management of RPOC.What do the results of this study add? To the best of our knowledge, this article is unique in addressing success, safety and possible limiting factors of OH in removing placental polyps. According to our findings, OH is highly successful (93%), safe, and well tolerated in removing RPOC up to 30 mm in thickness and with no or minimal vascularisation on ultrasound. Thorough follow-up (68% with OH, 9% with US after 1 month) adds to strength of data.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Removing large and vascularised RPOC can be a very demanding procedure, yet a majority of patients might benefit from an outpatient approach. Prospective studies on limiting factors and more data on long term reproductive outcomes are needed to fully compare OH to other methods of removal.