Atomistic insights into the reentrant phase-transitions in polyuracil and polylysine mixtures.

The phase separation of protein and RNA mixtures underpins the assembly and regulation of numerous membraneless organelles in cells. The ubiquity of protein-RNA condensates in cellular regulatory processes is in part due to their sensitivity to RNA concentration, which affects their physical properties and stability. Recent experiments with poly-cationic peptide-RNA mixtures have revealed closed-loop phase diagrams featuring lower and upper critical solution temperatures. These diagrams indicate reentrant phase transitions shaped by biomolecular interactions and entropic forces such as solvent and ion reorganization. We employed atomistic simulations to study mixtures with various RNA-polylysine stoichiometries and temperatures to elucidate the microscopic driving forces behind reentrant phase transitions in protein-RNA mixtures. Our findings reveal an intricate interplay between hydration, ion condensation, and specific RNA-polylysine hydrogen bonding, resulting in distinct stoichiometry-dependent phase equilibria governing stabilities and structures of the condensate phase. Our simulations show that reentrant transitions are accompanied by desolvation around the phosphate groups of RNA, with increased contacts between phosphate and lysine side chains. In RNA-rich systems at lower temperatures, RNA molecules can form an extensive pi-stacking and hydrogen bond network, leading to percolation. In protein-rich systems, no such percolation-induced transitions are observed. Furthermore, we assessed the performance of three prominent water force fields-Optimal Point Charge (OPC), TIP4P-2005, and TIP4P-D-in capturing reentrant phase transitions. OPC provided a superior balance of interactions, enabling effective capture of reentrant transitions and accurate characterization of changes in solvent reorganization. This study offers atomistic insights into the nature of reentrant phase transitions using simple model peptide and nucleotide mixtures. We believe that our results are broadly applicable to larger classes of peptide-RNA mixtures exhibiting reentrant phase transitions.

Solution Structure of Poly(UG) RNA.

Poly(UG) or "pUG" RNAs are UG or GU dinucleotide repeat sequences which are highly abundant in eukaryotes. Post-transcriptional addition of pUGs to RNA 3' ends marks mRNAs as vectors for gene silencing in C. elegans. We previously determined the crystal structure of pUG RNA bound to the ligand N-methyl mesoporphyrin IX (NMM), but the structure of free pUG RNA is unknown. Here we report the solution structure of the free pUG RNA (GU)12, as determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy and small and wide-angle x-ray scattering (NMR-SAXS-WAXS). The low complexity sequence and 4-fold symmetry of the structure result in overlapped NMR signals that complicate chemical shift assignment. We therefore utilized single site-specific deoxyribose modifications which did not perturb the structure and introduced well-resolved methylene signals that are easily identified in NMR spectra. The solution structure ensemble has a root mean squared deviation (RMSD) of 0.62 Å and is a compact, left-handed quadruplex with a Z-form backbone, or "pUG fold." Overall, the structure agrees with the crystal structure of (GU)12 bound to NMM, indicating the pUG fold is unaltered by docking of the NMM ligand. The solution structure reveals conformational details that could not be resolved by x-ray crystallography, which explain how the pUG fold can form within longer RNAs.

Interactions of arene ruthenium(II) complexes [η6-(C6H6)Ru(pprip)Cl]+ and [η6-(C6H6)Ru(H2iiP)Cl]+ with RNA triplex poly(U)•poly(A)*poly(U).

Two arene ruthenium(II) complexes [η6-(C6H6)Ru(pprip)Cl]PF6 (Ru1; pprip = 2-(3-phenyl-1H-pyrazol-4-yl)-imidazolo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline) and [η6-(C6H6)Ru(H2iiP)Cl]PF6 (Ru2; H2iiP = 2-(indole-3-yl)-imidazolo[4,5-f][1,10]phenanthroline) have been synthesized and characterized in this work. Binding properties of Ru1 and Ru2 with the triplex RNA poly(U)•poly(A)*poly(U) were investigated by spectrophotometry and spectrofluorometry as well as viscosimetry. Analysis of spectroscopic titrations and viscosity measurements show that the two complexes bind with the triplex through intercalation, while the binding affinity for Ru2 toward the triplex is stronger than that for Ru1. Melting experiments indicate that the stabilizing effects of Ru1 and Ru2 toward the triplex differ from each other. Under the conditions used herein, Ru1 only stabilizes the Hoogsteen base-paired strand (third strand) without affecting stabilization of the Watson-Crick base-paired strand (the template duplex) of the triplex, while Ru2 stabilizes both the template duplex and the third strand. Although the two complexes prefer to stabilizing the third strand rather than the template duplex, the third-strand stabilization effect of Ru2 is stronger than that of Ru1. The obtained results of this work reveal that the planarity of the intercalative ligands plays an important role in the triplex stabilization by arene Ru(II) complexes.

Binding and stabilizating effect of RNA triplex poly(U)⋠poly(A)*poly(U) by enantiomers of ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complex [Ru(bpy)2(dppx)]2.

Two chiral ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complexes, Λ-[Ru(bpy)2(dppx)]2+ (bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine, dppx = 7,8-dimethyldipyridophenazine; Λ-1) and Δ-[Ru(bpy)2(dppx)]2+ (Δ-1) have been synthesized and characterized in this work. Interactions of Λ-1 and Δ-1 with the RNA triplex poly(U)⋅poly(A)*poly(U) have been investigated by various biophysical techniques. Spectrophotometric titrations and viscosity measurements suggested that enantiomers Λ-1 and Δ-1 bind with the triplex through intercalation, while the binding strengths of the two enantiomers toward the triplex differed only slightly from each other. Fluorescence titrations showed that although enantiomers Λ-1 and Δ-1 exhibited molecular "light switch" effects toward the triplex, the effect of Δ-1 was more marked. Furthermore, Furthermore, thermal denaturation showed that the two enantiomers have significantly different stabilizing effects on the triplex. The obtained results indicate that the racemic complex [Ru(bpy)2(dppx)]2+ is similar to a non-specific metallointercalator for the triplex investigated in this study, and chiralities of Ru(II) polypyridine complexes have an important influence on the binding and stabilizing effects of enantiomers toward the triplex. Two chiral ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complexes, Λ-[Ru(bpy)2(dppx)]2+ (bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine, dppx = 7,8-dimethyldipyridophenazine; Λ-1) and Δ-[Ru(bpy)2(dppx)]2+ (Δ-1) have been synthesized and characterized in this work. Interactions of Λ-1 and Δ-1 with the RNA triplex poly(U)⋅poly(A)*poly(U) have been investigated by various biophysical techniques. The obtained results indicate that the racemic complex [Ru(bpy)2(dppx)]2+ is similar as a non-specific metallointercalator for the triplex investigated in this study, and chiralities of Ru(II) polypyridine complexes have an important influence on the binding and stabilizing effects of enantiomers toward the triplex.

Binding properties of a molecular "light switch" ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complex toward double- and triple-helical forms of RNA.

To further develop new luminescent probes for RNA, a new ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complex [Ru(dmb)2dppz-idzo]2+ (dmb = 4,4'-dimethyl-2,2'-bipyridine, dppz-idzo = dppz-imidazolone) has been synthesized and characterized in this study. Binding properties of [Ru(dmb)2dppz-idzo]2+ to RNA duplex poly(A) · poly(U) and triplex poly(U) · poly(A) ∗ poly(U) have been explored by spectroscopic techniques and viscometry experiments. The binding modes of [Ru(dmb)2dppz-idzo]2+ to RNA duplex and triplex are intercalation as revealed from spectral titrations and viscosity experiments, while the binding strength of this complex to duplex structure is significantly greater than that of triplex structure. Fluorescence titrations indicate that [Ru(dmb)2dppz-idzo]2+ can act as a molecular "light switch" for both duplex poly(A) · poly(U) and triplex poly(U) · poly(A) ∗ poly(U), while [Ru(dmb)2dppz-idzo]2+ is more sensitive to poly(A) · poly(U) compared to poly(U) · poly(A) ∗ poly(U) and poly(U). Therefore, this complex can distinguish between RNA duplex, triplex and poly(U), and can as luminescent probes for the three RNAs used in this study. In addition, thermal denaturation studies show that [Ru(dmb)2dppz-idzo]2+ is able to significantly increase the Stabilization of RNA duplex and triplex. The results obtained in this study may contribute to further understanding of the binding of Ru(II) complexes with different structural RNAs.

Insight into achirality and chirality effects in interactions of an racemic ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complex and its Δ- and Λ-enantiomers with an RNA triplex.

RNA triplexes have a variety of potential applications in molecular biology, diagnostics and therapeutics, while low stabilization of the third strand hinders their practical utilities under physiological conditions. In this regard, achieving the third-strand stabilization by binding small molecules is a promising strategy. Chirality is one of the basic properties of nature. To clarify achirality and chirality effects on the binding and stabilizing effects of RNA triplexes by small molecules, we report for the first time the RNA interactions of an racemic ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complex [Ru(bpy)2(11-CN-dppz)]2+ (rac-Ru1) and its two enantiomers Δ/Λ-[Ru(bpy)2(11-CN-dppz)]2+ (Δ/Λ-Ru1) with an RNA triplex poly(U-A*U) (where "-" represents Watson-Crick base pairing, and "*" denotes Hoogsteen base pairing, respectively) in this work. Research shows that although rac-Ru1 and its two enantiomers Δ/Λ-Ru1 bind to the RNA triplex through the same mode of intercalation, the binding affinity for enantiomer Δ-Ru1 is much higher than that for rac-Ru1 and enantiomer Λ-Ru1. However, compared to enantiomer Λ-Ru1, the binding affinity for rac-Ru1 does not show much of an advantage, which is slightly greater than that for the former. Thermal denaturation measurements reveal both rac-Ru1 and Δ-Ru1 to have a preference for stabilizing the third strand rather than the template duplex of the RNA triplex, while Λ-Ru1 stabilizes the RNA triplex without significant selectivity. Besides, the third-strand stabilizing effects by rac-Ru1 and Δ-Ru1 are not markedly different from each other, but more marked than that by Λ-Ru1. This work shows that the binding properties of the racemic Ru(II) polypyridyl complex with the RNA triplex are not simply an average of its two enantiomers, indicating potentially complicated binding events.

A naked-eye colorimetric molecular "light switch" based on ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complex [Ru(phen)2ttbd]2+ as binder and stabilizer for RNA duplex and triplex.

Binding of [Ru(phen)2ttbd]2+ (phen = 1,10-phenanthroline, ttbd = 4-(6-propenylpyrido-[3,2-a]- phenzain-10-yl-benzene-1,2-diamine) to the RNA triplex poly(U-A*U) (herein "-" and "*" refer to the Watson-Crick and Hoogsteen binding, respectively) and the duplex poly(A-U) have been investigated by spectral technology and viscosity method. Analysis of spectral titrations and viscosity experiments as well as melting measurements suggest that [Ru(phen)2ttbd]2+ binds to the studied RNA triplex and duplex through intercalation, while its binding constant toward the triplex is greater than the duplex. Luminescent titrations indicate that [Ru(phen)2ttbd]2+ can act as a molecular "light switch" for the two RNAs and the switch effect can be detected by the naked-eye. Moreover, the "light switch" can be repeatedly cycled off and on by adjusting the pH of the solution, whereas color change in the case of the triplex is more significant compared with the duplex. To our knowledge, [Ru(phen)2ttbd]2+ is the first small molecule capable of serving as a pH-controlled reversible visual molecular "light switch" for both the RNA triplex poly(U-A*U) and duplex poly(A-U). Thermal denaturation experiments suggest that [Ru(phen)2ttbd]2+ can obviously increase the triplex stabilization, while it stabilizing third-strand is more marked in comparison with the template duplex of the triplex, indicating this complex preferentially binds to third-strand. The obtained results may be useful for understanding the binding of Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes to RNAs.

Interaction of arene ruthenium(II) complexes [(η6-C6H6)Ru(L)Cl]PF6 (L = o-fpip and p-fpip) with the RNA triplex poly(U)*poly(A)•poly(U).

To comprehend the binding properties of η6-arene Ru(II) complexes with poly(U)*poly(A)•poly(U) triplex, two arene Ru(II) complexes with different fluorine substituent positions, [(η6-C6H6)Ru(o-fpip)Cl]PF6 (Ru1,η6-C6H6 = benzene ring, o-fpip = 2-(2'­fluorine) imidazo [4,5-f] Biver et al. (2008), Gupta et al. (2012) [1, 10] phenanthroline) and [(η6-C6H6)Ru(p-fpip)Cl]PF6 (Ru2,η6-C6H6 = benzene ring, o-fpip = 2-(4'­fluorine) imidazo [4,5-f] Biver et al. (2008), Gupta et al. (2012) [1, 10] phenanthroline), have been synthesized and characterized in this study. The binding of Ru1 and Ru2 with poly(U)*poly(A)•poly(U) triplex has been investigated by viscosity measurement and spectroscopic methods. Analysis of UV-Vis absorption spectral titrations suggests that Ru1 and Ru2 bind to the triplex through an intercalative mode, but the binding affinity of Ru2 is slightly higher than that of Ru1, which is also verified by viscosity and EB (ethidium bromide) competition measurements. Furthermore, the thermal denaturation experiment shows that Ru1 and Ru2 increase the third-strand stabilization to a similar extent. Interestingly, the two complexes have essentially no effect on the stabilization of the template duplex. Considering the structure of Ru1 and Ru2, conceivably besides the intercalation of ligand, the force stabilizing the triplex should also involve covalent binding and electrostatic interaction. The obtained results will contribute to our understanding of the interaction of arene Ru(II) complexes with the poly(U)*poly(A)•poly(U) triplex.

Validation and classification of RNA binding proteins identified by mRNA interactome capture.

RNA binding proteins (RBPs) take part in all steps of the RNA life cycle and are often essential for cell viability. Most RBPs have a modular organization and comprise a set of canonical RNA binding domains. However, in recent years a number of high-throughput mRNA interactome studies on yeast, mammalian cell lines, and whole organisms have uncovered a multitude of novel mRNA interacting proteins that lack classical RNA binding domains. Whereas a few have been confirmed to be direct and functionally relevant RNA binders, biochemical and functional validation of RNA binding of most others is lacking. In this study, we used a combination of NMR spectroscopy and biochemical studies to test the RNA binding properties of six putative RBPs. Half of the analyzed proteins showed no interaction, whereas the other half displayed weak chemical shift perturbations upon titration with RNA. One of the candidates we found to interact weakly with RNA in vitro is Drosophila melanogaster end binding protein 1 (EB1), a master regulator of microtubule plus-end dynamics. Further analysis showed that EB1's RNA binding occurs on the same surface as that with which EB1 interacts with microtubules. RNA immunoprecipitation and colocalization experiments suggest that EB1 is a rather nonspecific, opportunistic RNA binder. Our data suggest that care should be taken when embarking on an RNA binding study involving these unconventional, novel RBPs, and we recommend initial and simple in vitro RNA binding experiments.

Arginine multivalency stabilizes protein/RNA condensates.

Biomolecular condensates assembled through liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) of proteins and RNAs are currently recognized to play an important role in cellular organization. Their assembly depends on the formation of a network of transient, multivalent interactions between flexible scaffold biomolecules. Understanding how protein and RNA sequences determine these interactions and ultimately regulate the phase separation is an open key challenge. Recent in vitro studies have revealed that arginine and lysine residues, which are enriched in most cellular condensates, have markedly distinct propensities to drive the LLPS of protein/RNA mixtures. Here, we employ explicit-solvent atomistic molecular dynamics simulations to shed light on the microscopic origin of this difference by investigating mixtures of polyU oligonucleotides with either polyR/polyK peptides. In agreement with experiments, our simulations indicate that arginine has a higher affinity for polyU than lysine both in highly diluted conditions and in concentrated solutions with a biomolecular density comparable to cellular condensate. The analysis of intermolecular contacts suggests that this differential behavior is due to the propensity of arginine side chains to simultaneously form a higher number of specific interactions with oligonucleotides, including hydrogen bonds and stacking interactions. Our results provide a molecular description of how the multivalency of the guanidinium group enables the coordination of multiple RNA groups by a single arginine residue, thus ultimately stabilizing protein/RNA condensates.

Interaction of double-stranded polynucleotide poly(A:U) with graphene/graphene oxide.

Hybrids formed by DNA/RNA and graphene family nanomaterials are considered as potentially useful multifunctional agents in biosensing and nanomedicine. In this work, we study the noncovalent interaction between double-stranded (ds) RNA, polyadenylic:polyuridylic acids (poly(A:U)) and graphene oxide/graphene (GO/Gr) using UV absorption spectroscopy and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations. RNA melting showed that relatively long ds-RNA is adsorbed onto GO (at an ionic strength of [Formula: see text]) at that a large fraction of RNA maintains the duplex structure. It was revealed that this fraction decreases over long time (during a few days), indicating a slow adsorption process of the long polymer. MD simulations showed that the adsorption of duplex (rA)[Formula: see text]: (rU)[Formula: see text] or (rA)[Formula: see text]: (rU)[Formula: see text] on graphene starts with the interaction between [Formula: see text]-systems of graphene and base pairs located at a duplex tail. In contrast to relatively long duplex (rA)[Formula: see text]: (rU)[Formula: see text] which keeps parallel arrangement along the graphene surface, the shorter one ((rA)[Formula: see text]: (rU)[Formula: see text]) always adopts a perpendicular orientation relative to graphene even in case of the initial parallel orientation. It was found out that (rA)[Formula: see text]: (rU)[Formula: see text] forms the stable hybrid with graphene keeping essential fraction of the duplex, while (rA)[Formula: see text]: (rU)[Formula: see text] demonstrates the duplex unzipping into two single strands with time. The interaction energies between adenine/uracil stacked with graphene as well between nucleotides in water environment were determined.

A phenolic hydroxyl in the ortho- and meta-positions on the main ligands effect on the interactions of [Ru(phen)2(o-HPIP)]2+ and [Ru(phen)2(m-HPIP)]2+ with the poly(U)·poly(A)*poly(U) triplex.

The association of two ruthenium(II) complexes [Ru(phen)2(o-HPIP)]2+ (Ru1; phen = 1,10-phenanthroline, o-HPIP = 2-(2-hydroxyphenyl)-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10] phenanthroline) and [Ru(phen)2(m-HPIP)]2+ (Ru2; m-HPIP = 2-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-imidazo[4,5-f][1,10]phenan- throline) with the RNA poly(U)·poly(A)⁎poly(U) triplex has been investigated by spectrophotometric titrations and melting experiments in this work. All experimental data reveal an intercalative triplex-binding mode of the two complexes, whereas the binding constant for Ru1 is significantly higher than that for Ru2. Circular dichroism spectroscopic investigations show that the two complexes could bind to the chiral environment of the triplex, but the triplex perturbation effects induced by Ru1 are more marked. Thermal denaturation experiments demonstrate that both Ru1 and Ru2 display a large binding preference and stabilizing effect for the third strand over the Watson-Crick base-paired duplex of the triplex. However, the third-strand stabilizing effect of Ru1 is much more effective than that of Ru2. The obtained results suggest that positions of the phenolic group on the main ligands have significant effect on the binding of the two complexes with poly(U)·poly(A)⁎poly(U) triplex.

Flexibility and Preorganization of Fluorescent Nucleobase-Pyrene Conjugates Control DNA and RNA Recognition.

We synthesized a new amino acid-fluorescent nucleobase derivative (qAN1-AA) and from it two new fluorescent nucleobase-fluorophore (pyrene) conjugates, whereby only the analogue with the longer and more flexible linker (qAN1-pyr2) self-folded into intramolecularly stacked qAN1/pyrene conformation, yielding characteristic, 100 nm-red-shifted emission (λmax = 500 nm). On the contrary, the shorter and more rigid linker resulted in non-stacked conformation (qAN1-pyr1), characterized by the emission of free pyrene at λmax = 400 nm. Both fluorescent nucleobase-fluorophore (pyrene) conjugates strongly interacted with ds-DNA/RNA grooves with similar affinity but opposite fluorescence response (due to pre-organization), whereas the amino acid-fluorescent base derivative (qAN1-AA) was inactive. However, only intramolecularly self-folded qAN1-pyr2 showed strong fluorescence selectivity toward poly U (Watson-Crick complementary to qAN1 nucleobase) and poly A (reverse Hoogsteen complementary to qAN1 nucleobase), while an opposite emission change was observed for non-complementary poly G and poly C. Non-folded analogue (qAN1-pyr1) showed no ss-RNA selectivity, demonstrating the importance of nucleobase-fluorophore pre-organization.

Crystal structures and RNA-binding properties of Lsm proteins from archaea Sulfolobus acidocaldarius and Methanococcus vannielii: Similarity and difference of the U-binding mode.

Sm and Sm-like (Lsm) proteins are considered as an evolutionary conserved family involved in RNA metabolism in organisms from bacteria and archaea to human. Currently, the function of Sm-like archaeal proteins (SmAP) is not well understood. Here, we report the crystal structures of SmAP proteins from Sulfolobus acidocaldarius and Methanococcus vannielii and a comparative analysis of their RNA-binding sites. Our data show that these SmAPs have only a uridine-specific RNA-binding site, unlike their bacterial homolog Hfq, which has three different RNA-binding sites. Moreover, variations in the amino acid composition of the U-binding sites of the two SmAPs lead to a difference in protein affinity for oligo(U) RNA. Surface plasmon resonance data and nucleotide-binding analysis confirm the high affinity of SmAPs for uridine nucleotides and oligo(U) RNA and the reduced affinity for adenines, guanines, cytidines and corresponding oligo-RNAs. In addition, we demonstrate that MvaSmAP1 and SacSmAP2 are capable of melting an RNA hairpin and, apparently, promote its interaction with complementary RNA.

Coronavirus endoribonuclease targets viral polyuridine sequences to evade activating host sensors.

Coronaviruses (CoVs) are positive-sense RNA viruses that can emerge from endemic reservoirs and infect zoonotically, causing significant morbidity and mortality. CoVs encode an endoribonuclease designated EndoU that facilitates evasion of host pattern recognition receptor MDA5, but the target of EndoU activity was not known. Here, we report that EndoU cleaves the 5'-polyuridines from negative-sense viral RNA, termed PUN RNA, which is the product of polyA-templated RNA synthesis. Using a virus containing an EndoU catalytic-inactive mutation, we detected a higher abundance of PUN RNA in the cytoplasm compared to wild-type-infected cells. Furthermore, we found that transfecting PUN RNA into cells stimulates a robust, MDA5-dependent interferon response, and that removal of the polyuridine extension on the RNA dampens the response. Overall, the results of this study reveal the PUN RNA to be a CoV MDA5-dependent pathogen-associated molecular pattern (PAMP). We also establish a mechanism for EndoU activity to cleave and limit the accumulation of this PAMP. Since EndoU activity is highly conserved in all CoVs, inhibiting this activity may serve as an approach for therapeutic interventions against existing and emerging CoV infections.

RNA Homopolymers Form Higher-Curvature Virus-like Particles Than Do Normal-Composition RNAs.

Unlike double-stranded DNA, single-stranded RNA can be spontaneously packaged into spherical capsids by viral capsid protein (CP) because it is a more compact and flexible polymer. Many systematic investigations of this self-assembly process have been carried out using CP from cowpea chlorotic mottle virus, with a wide range of sequences and lengths of single-stranded RNA. Among these studies are measurements of the relative packaging efficiencies of these RNAs into spherical capsids. In this work, we address a fundamental issue that has received very little attention, namely the question of the preferred curvature of the capsid formed around different RNA molecules. We show in particular that homopolymers of RNA-polyribouridylic acid and polyriboadenylic acid-form exclusively T = 2-sized (∼22-nm diameter) virus-like particles (VLPs) when mixed with cowpea chlorotic mottle virus CP, independent of their length, ranging from 500 to more than 4000 nucleotides. This is in contrast to "normal-composition" RNAs (i.e., molecules with comparable numbers of each of the four nucleotides and hence capable of developing a large amount of secondary structure because of intramolecular complementarity/basepairing); a curvature corresponding to T = 3-size (∼28 nm in diameter) is preferred for the VLPs formed with such RNAs. Our work is consistent with the preferred curvature of VLPs being a consequence of interaction of CP with RNA-in particular, the presence or absence of short RNA duplexes-and suggests that the equilibrium size of the capsid results from a trade-off between this optimum size and the cost of confinement.

Divalent cations can control a switch-like behavior in heterotypic and homotypic RNA coacervates.

Liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) of RNA-protein complexes plays a major role in the cellular function of membraneless organelles (MLOs). MLOs are sensitive to changes in cellular conditions, such as fluctuations in cytoplasmic ion concentrations. To investigate the effect of these changes on MLOs, we studied the influence of divalent cations on the physical and chemical properties of RNA coacervates. Using a model system comprised of an arginine-rich peptide and RNA, we predicted and observed that variations in signaling cations exert interaction-dependent effects on RNA LLPS. Changing the ionic environment has opposing effects on the propensity for heterotypic peptide-RNA and homotypic RNA LLPS, which results in a switch between coacervate types. Furthermore, divalent ion variations continuously tune the microenvironments and fluid properties of heterotypic and homotypic droplets. Our results may provide a general mechanism for modulating the biochemical environment of RNA coacervates in a cellular context.

Third-strand stabilizing effects of the RNA poly(U)·poly(A)*poly(U) triplex by a ruthenium(II) polypyridine complex and its hexaarginine peptide conjugate.

In this work, a Ru(II) complex [Ru(bpy)2(pip-CO2H)]2+ (Ru1) and its hexaarginine peptide conjugate [Ru(bpy)2(pic-Arg6)]8+ (Ru2) have been synthesized and characterized. The binding of Ru1 and Ru2 with poly(U)•poly(A)*poly(U) triplex has been studied. Results suggest that Ru1 binds in the surface of the minor groove while Ru2 binds to the minor groove of the triplex. Consequently, the triplex stabilization is barely affected by Ru1, while with Ru2 the triplex stabilizing effect is so strong that that dissociation of the triplex shows an overlapping of both melting processes with the melting temperature increased to a maximum of 56.1 °C at the CRu2/CUAU ratio of 0.05, where ΔTm1 and ΔTm2 are 19.6 and 10.1 °C, respectively. Furthermore, the effect of Ru2 stabilizing the third strand at such a low binding ratio of 0.05 is more marked than what obsereved for flavone luteolin and [Ru(bpy)2(mdpz)]2+, which are so far the strongest triplex stabilizers in the reported organic small molecules and metal complexes, respectively. Considering the structure natures of Ru2, conceivably except for electrostatic interaction, the forces stabilizing the triplex should also involve hydrophobic interaction and hydrogen bingding. To our knowledge, this work represents a first example of improving the triplex stabilization by a metallopeptide.

Binding propterties of two Ru(II) polypyridyl complexes containing dppz units and fluorine groups with poly(U)·poly(A) ∗ poly(U) triplex.

In this work, two Ru(II)-dppz (dppz = dipyrido[3,2-a:2',3'-c]phenazine) complexes containing fluorine substituents, [Ru(bpy)2(7-F-dppz)]2+ (Ru1, bpy = 2,2'-bipyridine, 7-F-dppz = 7-fluorodipyrido[3,2-a:2',3'-c]phenazine) and [Ru(phen)2(7-F-dppz)]2+ (Ru2, phen = 1,10-phenanthroline), have been synthesized and characterized. Binding properties of Ru1 and Ru2 with the RNA poly(U)·poly(A) ∗ poly(U) triplex have been studied by spectroscopic methods and viscosity measurements. The obtained results indicate that the binding differences of the two complexes with the triplex may be attributed to the ancillary ligand effects, implying that the better planarity and greater hydrophobicity of ancillary ligands are advantageous to the π-π stacking interaction between Ru2 and the triplex, thus Ru2 stabilizes the triplex strongly than Ru1. Denaturation of the triplex shows that both Ru1 and Ru2 can not only highly stabilize the template duplex of the triplex, but also significantly stabilize the third strand. Compared with the triplex stabilizing effects for the reported Ru(II)-dppz complexes, thermal melting experiments suggest that the fluorine substituent on the ligand dppz can probably decrease electrostatic repulsion between the three strands of the triplex, thereby Ru1 and Ru2 significantly increase the triplex stabilization. Results obtained from this work further confirm that the substituent electron effect of dppz-based ligands and the planarity and hydrophobicity of ancillary ligands play an important role in the triplex stabilizing effects by Ru(II)-dppz complexes.

Ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complex [Ru(phen)2dppz-idzo]2+ as a colorimetric molecular "light switch" and powerful stabilizer for the RNA triplex poly(U)·poly(A)*poly(U).

The interaction of [Ru(phen)2dppz-idzo]2+ (phen = 1,10-phenanthroline, dppz-idzo = dppz-imidazolone) with triplex RNA poly(U)·poly(A)*poly(U) was carried out by using spectroscopic and viscometric techniques in this work. Luminescent titrations suggest that [Ru(phen)2dppz-idzo]2+ shows better selectivity for poly(U)·poly(A)*poly(U) compared with poly(U)·poly(A) and poly(U), this complex exhibits a "light switch" effect with an emission enhancement factor of about 123 in the presence of poly(U)·poly(A)*poly(U). Significantly, this "light switch" behavior could even be observed by the naked eye under irradiation with UV light. To our knowledge, [Ru(bpy)2dppz-idzo]2+ is the first small molecule able to serve as a colorimetric molecular "light switch" for the triplex poly(U)·poly(A)*poly(U). Combined with the spectral and viscometric results as well as [Ru(phen)2dppz-idzo]2+ stabilizing the template duplex poly(U)·poly(A), we speculate that [Ru(phen)2dppz-idzo]2+ prefers to bind with the Hoogsteen base-paired strand (the third strand) of the triplex, thus the intercalating [Ru(phen)2dppz-idzo]2+ stabilizing the third strand is more marked in comparison with the Watson-Crick base-paired duplex of the triplex. The results obtained here may be useful for understanding the interaction of triplex RNA poly(U)·poly(A)*poly(U) with small molecule, particularly ruthenium(II) complexes.