Cladribine treatment for Erdheim-Chester disease involving the central nervous system and concomitant polycythemia vera: A case report.

Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD), a rare form of non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis, is characterized by the infiltration of foamy CD68+ and CD1a- histiocytes into multiple organ systems. Central nervous system (CNS) involvement has recently been reported to be a poor prognostic factor when treating ECD with interferon alpha. We report the case of a 66-year-old Japanese patient with ECD involving the CNS who harbored the BRAF V600E mutation and also concomitantly developed polycythemia vera with the JAK2 V617F mutation. We confirmed 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (cladribine) therapy to be effective for the patient in this case.

JAK2 inhibitors for myeloproliferative neoplasms: what is next?

Since its approval in 2011, the Janus kinase 1/2 (JAK1/2) inhibitor ruxolitinib has evolved to become the centerpiece of therapy for myelofibrosis (MF), and its use in patients with hydroxyurea resistant or intolerant polycythemia vera (PV) is steadily increasing. Several other JAK2 inhibitors have entered clinical testing, but none have been approved and many have been discontinued. Importantly, the activity of these agents is not restricted to patients with JAK2 V617F or exon 12 mutations. Although JAK2 inhibitors provide substantial clinical benefit, their disease-modifying activity is limited, and rational combinations with other targeted agents are needed, particularly in MF, in which survival is short. Many such combinations are being explored, as are other novel agents, some of which could successfully be combined with JAK2 inhibitors in the future. In addition, new JAK2 inhibitors with the potential for less myelosuppression continue to be investigated. Given the proven safety and efficacy of ruxolitinib, it is likely that ruxolitinib-based combinations will be a major way forward in drug development for MF. If approved, less myelosuppressive JAK2 inhibitors such as pacritinib or NS-018 could prove to be very useful additions to the therapeutic armamentarium in MF. In PV, inhibitors of histone deacetylases and human double minute 2 have activity, but their role, if any, in the future treatment algorithm is uncertain, given the availability of ruxolitinib and renewed interest in interferons. Ruxolitinib is in late-phase clinical trials in essential thrombocythemia, in which it could fill an important void for patients with troublesome symptoms.

Ruxolitinib reduces JAK2 p.V617F allele burden in patients with polycythemia vera enrolled in the RESPONSE study.

In patients with polycythemia vera (PV), an elevated JAK2 p.V617F allele burden is associated with indicators of more severe disease (e.g., leukocytosis, splenomegaly, and increased thrombosis risk); however, correlations between allele burden reductions and clinical benefit in patients with PV have not been extensively evaluated in a randomized trial. This exploratory analysis from the multicenter, open-label, phase 3 Randomized Study of Efficacy and Safety in Polycythemia Vera With JAK Inhibitor INCB018424 Versus Best Supportive Care trial evaluated the long-term effect of ruxolitinib treatment on JAK2 p.V617F allele burden in patients with PV. Evaluable JAK2 p.V617F-positive patients randomized to ruxolitinib (n = 107) or best available therapy (BAT) who crossed over to ruxolitinib at week 32 (n = 97) had consistent JAK2 p.V617F allele burden reductions throughout the study. At all time points measured (up to weeks 208 [ruxolitinib-randomized] and 176 [ruxolitinib crossover]), mean changes from baseline over time in JAK2 p.V617F allele burden ranged from -12.2 to -40.0% (ruxolitinib-randomized) and -6.3 to -17.8% (ruxolitinib crossover). Complete or partial molecular response was observed in 3 patients (ruxolitinib-randomized, n = 2; ruxolitinib crossover, n = 1) and 54 patients (ruxolitinib-randomized, n = 33; ruxolitinib crossover, n = 20; BAT, n = 1), respectively. Among patients treated with interferon as BAT (n = 13), the mean maximal reduction in allele burden from baseline was 25.6% after crossover to ruxolitinib versus 6.6% before crossover. Collectively, the data from this exploratory analysis suggest that ruxolitinib treatment for up to 4 years provides progressive reductions in JAK2 p.V617F allele burden in patients with PV who are resistant to or intolerant of hydroxyurea. The relationship between allele burden changes and clinical outcomes in patients with PV remains unclear.

Second line therapies in polycythemia vera: What is the optimal strategy after hydroxyurea failure?

Cytoreductive therapies have traditionally been the standard treatment for older patients with polycythemia vera (PV) or those with a history of prior thrombosis. Hydroxyurea (HU) is the most frequently used cytoreductive agent in PV. However, approximately 24% of patients treated with HU will eventually develop resistance or intolerance and patients who fail HU have an increased risk of death, transformation to myelofibrosis or acute myeloid leukemia. Interferon-alpha has been used in younger PV patients and is capable of inducing a complete hematologic response and significant reductions, or even eradication, of JAK2 V617F mutation allele burdens in a small but notable subset of PV patients. The potential toxicities of interferon-alpha must be weighed against the disease control benefit in a case-by-case fashion. Recently JAK2 inhibitor, ruxolitinib, demonstrated significant improvement in controlling the hematocrit and splenomegaly versus best available therapy in patients with PV who failed or are intolerant to HU and currently is FDA-approved in this setting. In this review, we will discuss novel emerging therapies for PV with a special focus on the currently available and upcoming treatment options for patients who fail HU.

[JAK2 inhibitors]. / Inhibidores de JAK2.

Pharmacological inhibition of the kinase activity of JAK proteins can interfere with the signaling of immunomodulatory cytokines and block the constitutive activation of the JAK-STAT pathway that characterizes certain malignancies, including chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms. JAK inhibitors may, therefore, be useful to treat malignancies as well as inflammatory or immune disorders. Currently, the most significant advances have been made in the treatment of myelofibrosis, where these drugs may lead to a remarkable improvement in the control of hyperproliferative manifestations. However, available data suggest that this treatment is not curative of myelofibrosis. In general, JAK2 inhibition induces cytopaenias, with this being considered a class side-effect. By contrast, the extrahaematologic toxicity profile varies significantly among the different JAK inhibitors. At present, there are several clinical trials evaluating the combination of ruxolitinib with other drugs, in order to improve its therapeutic activity as well as reducing haematologic toxicity.

The impact of ruxolitinib on thrombosis in patients with polycythemia vera and myelofibrosis: a meta-analysis.

The Food and Drug Administration approval of ruxolitinib for treatment of myelofibrosis and polycythemia vera has changed the management of patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms. Yet the impact of this therapy on risk of thrombosis, a major cause of morbidity and mortality among these patients, remains unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of ruxolitinib on the risk of thrombosis among patients with polycythemia vera or myelofibrosis. Following identification of randomized controlled trials comparing ruxolitinib to standard care or placebo, rates of thrombosis, including venous and arterial thrombosis, were analyzed using fixed effects models. Rates of thrombosis were significantly lower among patients treated with ruxolitinib [risk ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23-0.88]. Subgroup analysis of venous and arterial thrombosis demonstrated similar risk ratios, which did not reach statistical significance (risk ratio 0.46, 95% CI 0.14-1.48 and RR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18-1.01, respectively). In conclusion, our analysis suggests that JAK2 inhibition with ruxolitinib decreases the risk of arterial and/or venous thrombosis in patients with polycythemia vera or myelofibrosis. These findings will require confirmation in a prospective study.

JAK-2 V617F mutation increases heparanase procoagulant activity.

Patients with polycythaemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythaemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF) are at increased risk of arterial and venous thrombosis. In patients with ET a positive correlation was observed between JAK-2 V617F mutation, that facilitates erythropoietin receptor signalling, and thrombotic events, although the mechanism involved is not clear. We previously demonstrated that heparanase protein forms a complex and enhances the activity of the blood coagulation initiator tissue factor (TF) which leads to increased factor Xa production and subsequent activation of the coagulation system. The present study was aimed to evaluate heparanase procoagulant activity in myeloproliferative neoplasms. Forty bone marrow biopsies of patients with ET, PV, PMF and chronic myelogenous leukaemia (CML) were immunostained to heparanase, TF and TF pathway inhibitor (TFPI). Erythropoietin receptor positive cell lines U87 human glioma and MCF-7 human breast carcinoma were studied. Heparanase and TFPI staining were more prominent in ET, PV and PMF compared to CML. The strongest staining was in JAK-2 positive ET biopsies. Heparanase level and procoagulant activity were higher in U87 cells transfected to over express JAK-2 V617F mutation compared to control and the effect was reversed using JAK-2 inhibitors (Ruxolitinib, VZ3) and hydroxyurea, although the latter drug did not inhibit JAK-2 phosphorylation. Erythropoietin increased while JAK-2 inhibitors decreased the heparanase level and procoagulant activity in U87 and MCF-7 parental cells. In conclusion, JAK-2 is involved in heparanase up-regulation via the erythropoietin receptor. The present findings may potentially point to a new mechanism of thrombosis in JAK-2 positive ET patients.

Masked polycythaemia vera: presenting features, response to treatment and clinical outcomes.

Masked polycythaemia vera (PV) has been proposed as a new entity with poorer outcome than overt PV. In this study, the initial clinical and laboratory characteristics, response to treatment and outcome of masked and overt PV were compared using red cell mass and haemoglobin or haematocrit levels for the distinction between both entities. Sixty-eight of 151 PV patients (45%) were classified as masked PV according to World Health Organisation diagnostic criteria, whereas 16 (11%) were classified as masked PV using the British Committee for Standards in Haematology (BCSH). In comparison with overt PV, a higher platelet count and a lower JAK2V617F allele burden at diagnosis were observed in masked PV. Patients with masked PV needed lower phlebotomies and responded faster to hydroxcarbamide than those with overt PV. Complete haematological response was more frequently achieved in masked than in overt PV (79% vs. 58%, P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in the duration of haematological response, the rate of resistance or intolerance to hydroxycarbamide and the probability of molecular response according to type of PV (masked vs. overt). Overall survival, rate of thrombosis and major bleeding, and probability of transformation was superimposable among patients with masked and overt PV.

ruxolitinib (JAKAVI°) and polycythaemia vera Inconclusive evaluation.

Patients with polycythaemia vera, a myeloproliferative syndrome, are at increased risk of thrombotic events. Marrow fibrosis and transformation to acute leukaemia can also occur after several years. Treatment is based on phlebotomy and aspirin at low (antiplatelet) doses, sometimes combined with hydroxycarbamide, a cytotoxic drug. Various other drugs are available if hydroxycarbamide fails or is poorly tolerated, but there is no consensus treatment. Ruxolitinib inhibits Janus tyrosine kinases, which are involved, among other roles, in haematopoiesis. Ruxolitinib has been authorised in the European Union for patients with polycythaemia vera in whom hydroxycarbamide has failed or is poorly tolerated. Clinical evaluation of ruxolitinib in this setting is based on a randomised, unblinded trial versus treatment chosen by the investigators, in 222 patients treated for 32 weeks. Hydroxycarbamide was chosen in 59% of cases, even though the patients had unacceptable adverse effects or an inadequate response to the drug. The efficacy of the investigators' other treatment choices was uncertain. Phlebotomy was less frequent in the ruxofitinib group than in the control group. The adverse effects of ruxotitinib in this situation are poorly documented, due to inadequate long-term assessment. In the short term, ruxolitinib causes anaemia and thrombocytopenia, as well as bleeding, potentially severe infections, headache, sensory disturbances, and weight gain. It is also likely to share the serious adverse effects of other immunosuppressants. Ruxolitinib is mainly metabolised by cytochrome P450 isoenzymes CYP3A4 and CYP2C9, creating a risk of multiple drug interactions. Ruxolitinib showed embryofetal toxicity in animal studies. Virtually no data are available in pregnant women. In practice, available data on the harm-benefit balance of ruxolitinib fail to show that this drug represents a tangible advance for patients with polycythaemia vera, as compared with other drugs used when hydroxycarbamide is unsuitable.

Ruxolitinib: A Review in Polycythaemia Vera.

Ruxolitinib (Jakavi(®), Jakafi(®)) is an orally administered, first-in-class Janus Kinase (JAK) 1 and 2 inhibitor that was recently approved for the treatment of patients with polycythaemia vera (PV) who have responded inadequately to or are intolerant of hydroxyurea. By inhibiting JAK 1 and 2, ruxolitinib reduces hyperactive JAK-signal transducers and activators of transcription (STAT) signalling that is implicated in the pathogenesis of PV. This article briefly reviews the pharmacology of the drug, focusing on its clinical use in patients with PV. In the phase III RESPONSE trial in PV patients who had an inadequate response to or unacceptable adverse effects from hydroxyurea, ruxolitinib was superior to best available therapy in reducing haematocrit without phlebotomy and reducing spleen size after 32 weeks of treatment. Ruxolitinib was also associated with reducing leukocyte and platelet counts and improving symptoms. Patient follow-up demonstrated that response to ruxolitinib was durable, including preliminary results after up to 80 weeks of treatment. The drug is generally well tolerated, although mild to moderate anaemia, thrombocytopenia and lymphopenia were common in the RESPONSE trial. These effects can usually be managed with dosage modification and did not lead to therapy discontinuation in the RESPONSE trial. Thus, for a subgroup of PV patients for whom few treatment options have existed previously, ruxolitinib provides a valid option.

Current and future treatment options for polycythemia vera.

Patients with polycythemia vera (PV), a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by an elevated red blood cell mass, are at high risk of vascular and thrombotic complications and have reduced quality of life due to a substantial symptom burden that includes pruritus, fatigue, constitutional symptoms, microvascular disturbances, and bleeding. Conventional therapeutic options aim at reducing vascular and thrombotic risk, with low-dose aspirin and phlebotomy as first-line recommendations for patients at low risk of thrombotic events and cytoreductive therapy (usually hydroxyurea or interferon alpha) recommended for high-risk patients. However, long-term effective and well-tolerated treatments are still lacking. The discovery of mutations in Janus kinase 2 (JAK2) as the underlying molecular basis of PV has led to the development of several targeted therapies, including JAK inhibitors, and results from the first phase 3 clinical trial with a JAK inhibitor in PV are now available. Here, we review the current treatment landscape in PV, as well as therapies currently in development.

Open-label study of oral CEP-701 (lestaurtinib) in patients with polycythaemia vera or essential thrombocythaemia with JAK2-V617F mutation.

JAK2-V617F is central to the pathogenesis of myeloproliferative neoplasms. We examined whether lestaurtinib decreased JAK2-V617F allele burden and evaluated its clinical benefits and tolerability in patients with polycythaemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythaemia (ET). This phase 2, open-label, multicentre study was designed to detect ≥15% reduction in JAK2-V617F allele burden in 15% of patients. Eligible patients received lestaurtinib 80 mg twice daily for 18 weeks and could participate in a 1-year extension phase of treatment. Of 39 enrolled patients, 27 (69%) had PV; 12 (31%) had ET. While the pre-specified responder rate of 15% was not met, lestaurtinib modestly reduced JAK2-V617F allele burden and reduced spleen size in a subset of patients. Of 37 patients in the full efficacy analysis, 5 (14%) responded clinically. Every patient had ≥1 adverse event, most commonly gastrointestinal (95%). Fifteen patients (38%) experienced serious adverse events; 23 (59%) withdrew due to adverse events. This is the first reported study of JAK2-inhibitor treatment in patients with PV/ET and highlights both the need for further studies to assess the role of JAK2 inhibition in treatment of PV/ET and the use of JAK2-V617F as a biomarker for response. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00586651.

Hypoxia inhibits JAK2V617F activation via suppression of SHP-2 function in myeloproliferative neoplasm cells.

The hypoxic microenvironment of the bone marrow, known as the hypoxic niche, supports hematopoietic stem cell quiescence and maintains long-term repopulation activity. Hypoxia also affects the expansion of progenitor cells and enhances erythropoiesis and megakaryopoiesis. In contrast to the known effects of hypoxia on normal hematopoiesis, the effects of the hypoxic environment of the bone marrow on the pathogenesis of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) have not been well studied. In the present study, we investigated the role of the hypoxic environment in the pathophysiology of MPNs, focusing on JAK2V617F, a major driver of mutation in Philadelphia-negative MPNs. We found that the activity of JAK2V617F was suppressed in hypoxic conditions not only in JAK2V617F-positive leukemia cells, but also in primary peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients with polycythemia vera. Concomitant with the inhibition of JAK2V617F activity, hypoxia increased the expression of p27/KIP1, the primary negative regulator of the cell cycle, and inhibited cell cycle progression in JAK2V617F-positive leukemia cell lines. The spontaneous erythroid colony formation of primary cells from polycythemia vera patients was also suppressed under hypoxic conditions. We also revealed that the hypoxia-induced overproduction of reactive oxygen species played a crucial role in the inhibition of JAK2V617F through the oxidation and inhibition of SHP-2, a protein tyrosine phosphatase that contains SH-2, which is required for JAK2 activation. In conclusion, a hypoxic environment may modulate JAK2-positive MPN cell fate and disease progression through the suppression of SHP-2 function and the subsequent suppression of JAK2V617F activity.

Association between thromboembolic events and the JAK2 V617F mutation in myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Thrombotic complications are a major cause of death in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs), which are closely associated with the JAK2 V617F activating mutation. However, whether the presence of the JAK2 V617F mutation affects thrombotic risk is currently unknown, although some reports have suggested a variable association with thrombosis. Therefore, we investigated the association between JAK2 V617F and various complications, including thrombosis, in Japanese patients with MPNs. We assessed the JAK2 V617F status in 140 patients who were diagnosed or doubted as having some type of MPN by utilizing a JAK2 V617F-specific guanine-quenching probe. JAK2 V617F was detected in 31 of 51 patients (60.8%) with essential thrombocythemia, all 16 patients (100%) with polycythemia vera, 4 of 11 patients (36.4%) with primary myelofibrosis, 2 of 18 patients (11.1%) with other types of MPNs, and none of the 44 patients with doubted MPN. In the 78 patients with classical MPN, JAK2 V617F correlated with a leukocyte count ≥10,000/µl (p=0.046). Complications of thrombosis, hemorrhage, and leukemic transformation occurred in 21 (41.2%), 4 (25.0%), and 3 (27.3%) patients with classical MPN, respectively, and thrombotic events (TE) occurred more frequently in patients with JAK2 V617F than without (p=0.047). Based on these findings, initial screening for the JAK2 mutation and careful monitoring for thrombotic events should be performed in patients with MPN.

Discriminating between essential thrombocythemia and masked polycythemia vera in JAK2 mutated patients.

In patients not meeting the required hematocrit (HCT) or hemoglobin (Hb) thresholds according to BCSH and the WHO diagnostic criteria, the diagnosis of masked polycythemia vera (mPV) has been proposed. A comparison of HCT or Hb values with the expression of JAK2V617F, JAK2 exon 12, and CALR mutations in strictly WHO-defined 257 overt PV and 140 mPV (59 mPV according to BCSH) and 397 patients with essential thrombocythemia (ET) was performed. Hb and HCT thresholds of mPV patients were significantly higher than JAK2V617F ET (P < 0.0001). The best cut-off for Hb to discriminate JAK2-mutated ET from PV was 16.5 g/dL for males and 16.0 g/dL for females. For HCT, this was 49% in males and 48% in females. The proportion of patients correctly classified as ET or PV when regarding Hb or HCT levels was 95% in males and 93% in females and 94% in both males and females, respectively.

JAK2V617F monitoring in polycythemia vera and essential thrombocythemia: clinical usefulness for predicting myelofibrotic transformation and thrombotic events.

The JAK2V617F allele burden has been identified as a risk factor for vascular events and myelofibrotic transformation in polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET). However, all previous studies have evaluated a single time point JAK2V617F measurement. Therefore, the frequency and the clinical significance of changes in the JAK2V617F mutant load occurring during the disease evolution remain unknown. In the present study, JAK2V617F monitoring was performed during the follow-up of 347 patients (PV = 163, ET = 184). According to their JAK2V617F evolutionary patterns, patients were stratified as stable < 50% (n = 261), stable ≥50% (n = 52), progressive increase (n = 24) and unexplained decrease (n = 10). After a 2,453 person-years follow-up, a total of 59 thrombotic events, 16 major hemorrhages, and 27 cases of myelofibrotic transformations were registered. At multivariate analyses, patients with a persistently high (≥50%) or unsteady JAK2V617F load during follow-up had an increased risk of myelofibrotic transformation (Incidence rate ratio [IRR]: 20.7, 95% CI: 6.5-65.4; P < 0.001) and a trend for a higher incidence of thrombosis (IRR: 1.7, 1-3.3; P = 0.05) than patients with a stable allele burden below 50%. In conclusion, JAK2V617F monitoring could be useful in patients with PV and ET for predicting disease's complications, especially myelofibrotic transformation.

JAK2 p.V617F detection and allele burden measurement in peripheral blood and bone marrow aspirates in patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms.

Detection of the JAK2 p.V617F mutation and measurement of its allele burden can be performed using both peripheral blood (PB) and bone marrow (BM) samples from patients with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs). However, the diagnostic accuracy of detecting the JAK2 p.V617F mutation and quantifying its allele burden in PB and BM samples has not been systematically compared. We retrospectively analyzed 388 patients with MPN who had been tested for JAK2 p.V617F allele burden using both PB and BM samples within 3 months of each other. The sensitivity and specificity of detecting JAK2 p.V617F in PB when compared with BM were both 100%. Furthermore, the JAK2 p.V617F allele burden measured in PB and BM were equivalent by linear regression analysis (R(2) = 0.991; P < .0001). We therefore conclude that PB is a reliable source for testing for the JAK2 p.V617F mutation and quantifying its allele burden in patients with MPN.