Battle of polymyxin induced nephrotoxicity: Polymyxin B versus colistin.

OBJECTIVES: Nephrotoxicity is the most serious and common adverse effect that limits the use of polymyxins. This study compared polymyxin E (colistin) and polymyxin B regarding drug-related nephrotoxicity. METHODS: This study was conducted as a retrospective cohort study in a university hospital between January 2020 and July 2022. Patients older than 18 years and who received colistin or polymyxin B were identified using electronic hospital records. Kidney disease improving global outcome criteria were used for assessing nephrotoxicity. RESULTS: A total of 190 patients, 95 in both groups, were evaluated. The incidence of acute kidney injury during the treatment was higher in the colistin group [52.6% (n = 50) and 34.7% (n = 33), P = 0.013]. In patients who were exposed to high-dose, the rate of nephrotoxicity was higher in patients receiving colistin [25% (n = 3) vs. 76.9% (n = 10); P = 0.017]. Nephrotoxicity was reversible in 64.4% (n = 38) of patients and the reversibility rate was similar (70% and 52.6% for colistin and polymyxin; P = 0.248). In the multivariable analysis, colistin treatment [odds ratio (OR): 3.882, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = (1.829-8.241)], concomitant vasopressor use (OR = 2.08, CI: 1.036-4.179), and age (OR=1.036, CI: 1.014-1.058) were found to be independent markers of nephrotoxicity. CONCLUSION: Nephrotoxicity was more common in patients receiving high-dose colistin than polymyxin B. Therefore, the use of appropriate doses of colistin is important in terms of preventing nephrotoxicity. In addition, advancing age and concomitant use of vasopressors contribute to polymyxin-related nephrotoxicity.

Zileuton ameliorates aminoglycoside and polymyxin-associated acute kidney injury in an animal model.

OBJECTIVES: Aminoglycosides and polymyxins are antibiotics with in vitro activity against MDR Gram-negative bacteria. However, their clinical use is hindered by dose-limiting nephrotoxicity. The objective of this project was to determine if zileuton can reduce nephrotoxicity associated with amikacin and polymyxin B in a rat model of acute kidney injury. METHODS: Sprague Dawley rats (n = 10, both genders) were administered either amikacin (300 mg/kg) or polymyxin B (20 mg/kg) daily for 10 days. Zileuton (4 and 10 mg/kg) was delivered intraperitoneally 15 min before antibiotic administration. Blood samples were collected at baseline and daily to determine serum creatinine concentration. Nephrotoxicity was defined as a ≥2× elevation of baseline serum creatinine. Time-to-event analysis and log rank test were used to compare the onset of nephrotoxicity in different cohorts. Histopathological analysis was also conducted to characterize the extent of kidney injury. RESULTS: Animals receiving amikacin or polymyxin B alone had nephrotoxicity rates of 90% and 100%, respectively. The overall rate was reduced to 30% in animals receiving adjuvant zileuton. The onset of nephrotoxicity associated with amikacin and polymyxin B was also significantly delayed by zileuton at 4 and 10 mg/kg, respectively. Histopathology confirmed reduced kidney injury in animals receiving amikacin concomitant with zileuton. CONCLUSIONS: Our pilot data suggest that zileuton has the potential to attenuate nephrotoxicity associated with last-line antibiotics. This would allow these antibiotics to treat MDR Gram-negative bacterial infections optimally without dose-limiting constraints. Further studies are warranted to optimize drug delivery and dosing in humans.

Efficacy and safety of ceftazidime-avibactam versus polymyxins in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae is increasingly recognised as a significant public health concern. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) and polymyxins are considered as the last therapeutic options worldwide. This is the first meta-analysis of recently published data to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI with polymyxins in the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections. DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched, for publications in any language, from database inception to February 2023. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTING STUDIES: Studies comparing the clinical efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI with polymyxins were included. Mortality, clinical success, microbiological eradication and nephrotoxicity were assessed as the main outcomes. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Literature screening, data extraction and the quality evaluation of studies were conducted by two researchers independently, with disagreements resolved by another researcher. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess the bias risk for the included studies. Review Manager V.5.3 was employed for the meta-analysis. RESULTS: The meta-analysis included seven retrospective and four prospective cohort studies with 1111 patients enrolled. The CAZ-AVI groups demonstrated a lower 30-day mortality (risk ratio (RR)=0.48, 95% CI of 0.37 to 0.63, I2=10%, p<0.0001) in nine studies with 766 patients; higher clinical success (RR=1.71, 95% CI 1.33 to 2.20, I2=35%, p<0.0001) in four studies with 463 patients; and lower nephrotoxicity in seven studies with 696 patients (RR=0.42, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.77, I2=35%, p<0.05). However, no significant difference in microbiological eradication rates was observed in 249 patients from two studies (RR=1.16, 95% CI 0.97 to 1.39, I2=0, p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Available evidence suggested that CAZ-AVI treatment held a dominant position with respect to efficacy and safety compared with polymyxins in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections. However, the analysis included only observational studies, and high-quality, large-scale, multicentre, double-blind randomised controlled trials are needed to confirm the advantage of CAZ-AVI.

Polymyxin Resistance in Clinical Isolates of K. pneumoniae in Brazil: Update on Molecular Mechanisms, Clonal Dissemination and Relationship With KPC-Producing Strains.

In Brazil, the production of KPC-type carbapenemases in Enterobacteriales is endemic, leading to widespread use of polymyxins. In the present study, 502 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates were evaluated for resistance to polymyxins, their genetic determinants and clonality, in addition to the presence of carbapenem resistance genes and evaluation of antimicrobial resistance. Resistance to colistin (polymyxin E) was evaluated through initial selection on EMB agar containing 4% colistin sulfate, followed by Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) determination by broth microdilution. The susceptibility to 17 antimicrobials was assessed by disk diffusion. The presence of blaKPC, blaNDM and blaOXA-48-like carbapenemases was investigated by phenotypic methods and conventional PCR. Molecular typing was performed by PFGE and MLST. Allelic variants of the mcr gene were screened by PCR and chromosomal mutations in the pmrA, pmrB, phoP, phoQ and mgrB genes were investigated by sequencing. Our work showed a colistin resistance frequency of 29.5% (n = 148/502) in K. pneumoniae isolates. Colistin MICs from 4 to >128 µg/mL were identified (MIC50 = 64 µg/mL; MIC90 >128 µg/mL). All isolates were considered MDR, with the lowest resistance rates observed for amikacin (34.4%), and 19.6% of the isolates were resistant to all tested antimicrobials. The blaKPC gene was identified in 77% of the isolates, in consonance with the high rate of resistance to polymyxins related to its use as a therapeutic alternative. Through XbaI-PFGE, 51 pulsotypes were identified. MLST showed 21 STs, with ST437, ST258 and ST11 (CC11) being the most prevalent, and two new STs were determined: ST4868 and ST4869. The mcr-1 gene was identified in 3 K. pneumoniae isolates. Missense mutations in chromosomal genes were identified, as well as insertion sequences in mgrB. Furthermore, the identification of chromosomal mutations in K. pneumoniae isolates belonging from CC11 ensures its success as a high-risk epidemic clone in Brazil and worldwide.

Safety evaluation of current therapies for high-risk severely ill patients with carbapenem-resistant infections.

INTRODUCTION: Infections due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) are increasingly frequent events, which are associated with a high mortality rate. Traditionally, combination regimens including high doses of "old antibiotics" such as polymyxins, tigecycline, and aminoglycosides have been used to treat these infections, but they were often associated with low efficacy and high excess of side effects and toxicity, especially nephrotoxicity. Along with the development of new compounds, the last decade has seen substantial improvements in the management of CR infections. AREAS COVERED: In this review, we aimed to discuss the safety characteristics and tolerability of different new options for treatment of CR infections. EXPERT OPINION: The availability of new drugs showing a potent in vitro activity against CR-GNB represents a unique opportunity to face the threat of resistance, while potentially reducing toxicity. A thorough understanding of the safety profile from clinical trials may guide the use of these new drugs in critically ill patients at high risk for the development of adverse events. Future data coming from real-life studies for drugs targeting CR infections are crucial to confirm the safety profile observed in pivotal trials.

Polymyxin Acute Kidney Injury: a case of severe tubulopathy.

Polymyxins are antibiotics developed in the 1950s. Polymyxin-induced neurotoxicity has been often described in medical literature. The same cannot be said of nephrotoxicity or tubulopathy in particular. This report describes the case of a patient prescribed polymyxin B to treat a surgical wound infection, which led to significant increases in fractional excretion of calcium, magnesium, and potassium and subsequent persistent decreases in the levels of these ions, with serious consequences for the patient. Severe hypocalcemia, hypomagnesemia, and hypokalemia may occur during treatment with polymyxin. Calcium, magnesium and potassium serum levels must be monitored during treatment to prevent life-threatening conditions.

Single- and Multiple-Ascending-Dose Study of the Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of the Polymyxin Derivative SPR206.

Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Enterobacterales are identified as urgent threats, and multidrug-resistant (MDR) Pseudomonas aeruginosa and extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing pathogens are identified as serious threats by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). SPR206 is a novel polymyxin derivative with potent in vitro and in vivo activity against A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, and multiple clinically important species of Enterobacterales, including multidrug- and extensively drug-resistant strains. This was a first-in-human (FIH) double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-, and multiple-ascending-dose study of the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of SPR206 in 94 healthy subjects. Following intravenous (i.v.) administration (1-h infusion) at single doses of 10 mg to 400 mg and multiple doses of 25 mg to 150 mg every 8 h (q8h) for 7 days and 100 mg q8h for 14 days, SPR206 was generally safe and generally well tolerated. While the incidence of adverse events increased with dose, most were of mild severity. Systemic exposure (maximum concentration of drug in serum [Cmax] and area under the concentration-time curve [AUC]) to SPR206 was approximately dose proportional, time to peak concentrations ranged from 1.1 to 1.3 h, and half-life ranged from 2.4 to 4.1 h. No appreciable accumulation occurred with repeated dosing of SPR206, and trough concentrations suggest that steady state was achieved by day 2. Urinary excretion of unchanged SPR206 was dose dependent across single- (SAD) and multiple-ascending-dose (MAD) cohorts, and the percentage of dose excreted as SPR206 was up to >50%. Importantly, no evidence of nephrotoxicity was observed over 14 days of 100 mg q8h dosing of SPR206; a dosing regimen anticipated to exceed requirements for clinical efficacy. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under identifier NCT03792308.).

Rescuing the Last-Line Polymyxins: Achievements and Challenges.

Antibiotic resistance is a major global health challenge and, worryingly, several key Gram negative pathogens can become resistant to most currently available antibiotics. Polymyxins have been revived as a last-line therapeutic option for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram negative bacteria, in particular Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacterales. Polymyxins were first discovered in the late 1940s but were abandoned soon after their approval in the late 1950s as a result of toxicities (e.g., nephrotoxicity) and the availability of "safer" antibiotics approved at that time. Therefore, knowledge on polymyxins had been scarce until recently, when enormous efforts have been made by several research teams around the world to elucidate the chemical, microbiological, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic, and toxicological properties of polymyxins. One of the major achievements is the development of the first scientifically based dosage regimens for colistin that are crucial to ensure its safe and effective use in patients. Although the guideline has not been developed for polymyxin B, a large clinical trial is currently being conducted to optimize its clinical use. Importantly, several novel, safer polymyxin-like lipopeptides are developed to overcome the nephrotoxicity, poor efficacy against pulmonary infections, and narrow therapeutic windows of the currently used polymyxin B and colistin. This review discusses the latest achievements on polymyxins and highlights the major challenges ahead in optimizing their clinical use and discovering new-generation polymyxins. To save lives from the deadly infections caused by Gram negative "superbugs," every effort must be made to improve the clinical utility of the last-line polymyxins. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Antimicrobial resistance poses a significant threat to global health. The increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections has been highlighted by leading global health organizations and authorities. Polymyxins are a last-line defense against difficult-to-treat MDR Gram negative pathogens. Unfortunately, the pharmacological information on polymyxins was very limited until recently. This review provides a comprehensive overview on the major achievements and challenges in polymyxin pharmacology and clinical use and how the recent findings have been employed to improve clinical practice worldwide.

The Low-Alkalinity Polymyxin Derivative, AL-6, Shows High Activity Against Multidrug-Resistant Acinetobacter baumannii Clinical Isolates In Vitro and A. baumannii ATCC 19606 In Vivo: Preliminary Analysis of the Antibacterial Mechanism.

Polymyxin B and colistin (polymyxin E) are increasingly used as the last line of therapy for infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative pathogens. However, nephrotoxicity is still a limiting factor for the use of polymyxin. Therefore, better tolerated and more effective polymyxin derivatives are urgently needed. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the activity of the low-alkalinity polymyxin derivative, AL-6, against MDR Acinetobacter baumannii (Ab) clinical isolates in vitro and A. baumannii ATCC 19606 in vivo. Additionally, we performed a preliminarily study of the antibacterial mechanism. AL-6 showed much higher activity (0.125-0.25 µg/mL) against MDR A. baumannii clinical isolates than polymyxin E2 (PE2, 0.5-1 µg/mL). AL-6 also showed much higher activity (0.5-256 µg/mL) against polymyxin-resistant strains than PE2 (16-1024 µg/mL). Additionally, AL-6 showed slow resistance against A. baumannii. AL-6 also increased the survival rates of mice by 10% at 48 h compared with PE2 (5 mg/kg). AL-6 could be used at a dose of up to 10 mg/kg, increasing the survival rate to 30% at 72 h after infection. A preliminary study of the antibacterial mechanism showed that AL-6 permeabilized the outer membrane and destroyed cell membrane integrity. Moreover, there was a substantial increase in zeta potential (i.e., less negative) upon AL-6 exposure for A. baumannii. Overall, AL-6 carrying only four positive charges showed high activity against A. baumannii in vitro by disrupting cell membrane integrity. Higher doses of AL-6 could increase survival rates of mice. Thus, AL-6 may have potential applications as a bactericidal agent.

Polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity and its predictors: a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies conducted using RIFLE criteria of acute kidney injury.

Polymyxins are last-resort antibiotics re-emerged to treat infections caused by multidrug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacterial infections. However, polymyxin-associated nephrotoxicity has become the main safety concern. Therefore, we conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis on polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity and its predictors using studies conducted based on the validated RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of Function and End-stage renal disease) criteria of acute kidney damage. Literature search was carried out through visiting legitimate databases and indexing services including PubMed, MEDLINE (Ovid®), EMBASE (Ovid®), and Scopus to retrieve relevant studies. Following screening and eligibility evaluation, relevant data were extracted from included studies and analyzed using STATA 15.0 and Rev-Man 5.3. Inverse variance method with random effects pooling model was used for the analysis of outcome measures at 95% confidence interval. Besides, meta-regression, meta-influence, and publication bias analyses were conducted. A total of 48 studies involving 6,199 adult patients aged ≥ 18 years were included for systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled incidence of polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity was found to be 45% (95% CI: 41- 49%; I2 = 92.52%). Stratifying with RIFLE severity scales, pooled estimates of polymyxin-treated patients identified as 'risk', 'injury' and 'failure' were 17% (95% CI: 14-20%), 13% (95% CI: 11-15%), and 10% (95% CI: 9-11%), respectively. Besides, the pooled incidence of colistin-induced nephrotoxicity was about 48% (95% CI: 42-54%), whereas that of polymyxin B was 38% (95% CI: 32-44%). Likewise, colistin had 37% increased risk of developing nephrotoxicity compared to the polymyxin B treated cohorts (RR = 1.37, 95% CI: 1.13-1.67; I2 = 57%). Older age (AOR = 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05), daily dose (AOR = 1.46, 95% CI: 1.09-1.96), underlying diabetes mellitus (AOR = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.25-2.63), and concomitant nephrotoxic drugs (AOR = 2.31, 95% CI: 1.79-3.00) were independent risk factors for polymyxin-induced nephrotoxicity. Patients with high serum albumin level were less likely (AOR = 0.69, 95% CI: 0.56-0.85] to experience nephrotoxicity compared to those with low albumin level. Despite the resurgence of these antibiotics for the chemotherapy of MDR/XDR-Gram-negative superbugs, the high incidence of nephrotoxicity has become a contemporary clinical concern. Being elderly, high daily dose, having underlying diseases such as diabetes, and use of concomitant nephrotoxic drugs were independent predictors of nephrotoxicity. Therefore, therapeutic drug monitoring should be done to these patients to outweigh the potential benefits of polymyxin therapy from its risk.

Non-polymyxin-based combinations as potential alternatives in treatment against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii infections.

Due to limited therapeutic options, combination therapy has been used empirically to treat carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). Polymyxin-based combinations have been widely studied and used in the clinical setting. However, the use of polymyxins is often limited due to nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity. This study aimed to evaluate the activity of non-polymyxin-based combinations relative to polymyxin-based combinations and to identify potential synergistic and bactericidal two-drug non-polymyxin-based combinations against CRAB. In vitro activity of 14 two-drug combinations against 50 A. baumannii isolates was evaluated using the checkerboard method. Subsequently, the two best-performing non-polymyxin-based combinations from the checkerboard assay were explored in static time-kill experiments. Concentrations of antibiotics corresponding to the fractional inhibitory concentrations (FIC) and the highest serum concentration achievable clinically were tested. The most synergistic combinations were fosfomycin/sulbactam (synergistic against 37/50 isolates; 74%), followed by meropenem/sulbactam (synergistic against 28/50 isolates; 56%). No antagonism was observed for any combination. Both fosfomycin/sulbactam and meropenem/sulbactam combinations exhibited bactericidal and synergistic activity against both isolates at the highest clinically achievable concentrations in the time-kill experiments. The meropenem/sulbactam combination displayed synergistic and bactericidal activity against one of two strains at concentrations equal to the FIC. Non-polymyxin-based combinations such as fosfomycin/sulbactam and meropenem/sulbactam may have a role in the treatment of CRAB. Further in vivo and clinical studies are required to scrutinise these activities further.

Clinical efficacy and safety of polymyxins based versus non-polymyxins based therapies in the infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of infections due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) is on the rise worldwide. Polymyxins are considered as last-resort drugs for CRAB infections, but there is still controversy regarding the efficacy and safety of polymyxins based therapies in CRAB infections. The present systematic review was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of polymyxins based therapies versus non-polymyxins based therapies in CRAB infections. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov to identify eligible studies reporting the clinical outcomes of patients with CRAB infections. The meta-analysis employed a random-effects model to estimate the odds ratio (OR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI). The primary outcome was 1-month mortality for any cause. We also examined clinical response, microbiological response, length of stay in hospital, and adverse events. RESULTS: Eleven eligible studies were analyzed (1052 patients in total), including 2 randomized clinical trials. Serious risk of bias was found in 8 out of the 11 studies. There was no statistically significant difference between polymyxins based therapies and non-polymyxins based therapies in 1-month mortality for any cause (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.53), microbiological response (OR, 3.83; 95% CI, 0.90 to 16.29) and length of stay in hospital (SMD, 0.24; 95% CI, - 0.08 to 0.56). The pooled OR of clinical response indicated a significant difference in favor of polymyxin based therapies (OR, 1.99; 95% CI, 1.31 to 3.03). The pooled OR of adverse events showed that non-polymyxins based therapies were associated with fewer adverse events (OR, 4.32; 95% CI, 1.39 to 13.48). CONCLUSION: The performance of polymyxins based therapies was better than non-polymyxin based therapies in clinical response rate and similar to non-polymyxin based therapies in terms of 1-month mortality and microbiological response in treating CRAB infections. Due to the limitations of our study, we cannot draw a firm conclusion on the optimal treatment of CRAB infections, but polymyxins would be a relatively effective treatment for CRAB infections. Adequate and well-designed large scale randomized controlled trials are required to clarify the relative efficacy of polymyxins based and non-polymyxins based therapies.

PRISM study: Comparison of a nystatin-neomycin-polymyxin B combination with miconazole for the empirical treatment of infectious vaginitis.

OBJECTIVE: An empirical treatment of infectious vaginitis is justified because of its multiple etiologies, the frequent uncertainty of clinical diagnosis and limits of microbiological analysis. Our aim was to comparatively investigate nystatin-neomycin-polymyxin B combination (NNP, Polygynax®) and miconazole. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this European multicenter, double-blind PRISM trial, participating women presenting with infectious vaginitis were randomized to receive one vaginal capsule containing either NNP for 12 days or miconazole for 3 days followed by 9 days of placebo. RESULTS: The clinical success rate was higher in the NNP group (n=302) than the miconazole group (n=309), with a difference between groups close to statistical significance (91.1% vs. 86.7%, P=0.0906). The risk of treatment failure was 36% lower in the NNP group (odds ratio, 0.64; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-1.07). Vaginal burning on Day 2 and vaginal discharge on Day 4 were significantly less intense in the NNP group than in the miconazole group (39.1 vs. 42.3, P=0.031 and 34.6 vs. 37.6, P=0.031, respectively). Adverse drug reactions were reported by 1.2% and 2.1% of patients in the NNP and miconazole group respectively, with the ratio of adverse drug reactions relative to total adverse events significantly higher in the miconazole group (20.3% vs. 6.9%, P=0.022). CONCLUSION: The widespread use of NNP for several decades and its good efficacy and safety profile, as well as the frequent diagnostic uncertainties due to the various pathogens sustain the initiation of this broad-spectrum empirical treatment in infectious vaginitis.

Can octapeptin antibiotics combat extensively drug-resistant (XDR) bacteria?

INTRODUCTION: The octapeptins are a family of cyclic lipopeptides first reported in the 1970s then largely ignored. At the time, their reported antibiotic activity against polymyxin-resistant bacteria was a curiosity. Today, the advent of widespread drug resistance in Gram-negative bacteria has prompted their 'rediscovery.' The paucity of new antibiotics in the clinical pipeline is coupled with a global spread of increasing antibiotic resistance, particularly to meropenem and polymyxins B and E (colistin). Areas covered: We review the original discovery of octapeptins, their recent first chemical syntheses, and their mode of action, then discuss their potential as a new class of antibiotics to treat extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative infections, with direct comparisons to the closely related polymyxins. Expert commentary: Cyclic lipopeptides in clinical use (polymyxin antibiotics) have significant dose-limiting nephrotoxicity inherent to their chemotype. This toxicity has prevented improved polymyxin analogs from progressing to the clinic, and tainted the perception of lipopeptide antibiotics in general. We argue that the octapeptins are fundamentally different from the polymyxins, with a disparate mode of action, spectra of action against MDR and XDR bacteria and a superior preclinical safety profile. They represent early-stage candidates that can help prime the antibiotic discovery pipeline.

Chromosomally encoded and plasmid-mediated polymyxins resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii: a huge public health threat.

Acinetobacter baumannii is an opportunistic pathogen associated with nosocomial and community infections of great clinical relevance. Its ability to rapidly develop resistance to antimicrobials, especially carbapenems, has re-boosted the prescription and use of polymyxins. However, the emergence of strains resistant to these antimicrobials is becoming a critical issue in several regions of the world because very few of currently available antibiotics are effective in these cases. This review summarizes the most up-to-date knowledge about chromosomally encoded and plasmid-mediated polymyxins resistance in A. baumannii. Different mechanisms are employed by A. baumannii to overcome the antibacterial effects of polymyxins. Modification of the outer membrane through phosphoethanolamine addition, loss of lipopolysaccharide, symmetric rupture, metabolic changes affecting osmoprotective amino acids, and overexpression of efflux pumps are involved in this process. Several genetic elements modulate these mechanisms, but only three of them have been described so far in A. baumannii clinical isolates such as mutations in pmrCAB, lpxACD, and lpsB. Elucidation of genotypic profiles and resistance mechanisms are necessary for control and fight against resistance to polymyxins in A. baumannii, thereby protecting this class for future treatment.

Clinical use of the polymyxins: the tale of the fox and the cat.

BACKGROUND: There is a need to identify practice patterns of polymyxin use, quantify gaps in knowledge, and recognize areas of persistent confusion. METHODS: A structured electronic survey was distributed to physicians, pharmacists and microbiologists. Demographic information was obtained, along with data regarding availability, stewardship principles, therapeutic usage, dosing, microbiological testing, and knowledge, attitudes and beliefs regarding the polymyxins. RESULTS: In total, there were 420 respondents with a median of 8 (interquartile range 4-15) years of experience in infectious diseases (52.5%) and critical care (35%). Of the respondents who reported that only one polymyxin was available for use, 17.1% used polymyxin B. Over half (52.5%) of the respondents utilized a loading dose very often/always, and 66.8% dosed both polymyxins in milligrams, with the most common doses of colistin and polymyxin B being 2.5 mg/kg twice daily (60.3%) and 1.5 mg/kg twice daily (65%), respectively, for patients with normal renal function. Polymyxins were most often used for respiratory infections (63%) in combination with a carbapenem (63.6%). Approximately 85% of respondents reported their knowledge level to be fair, good or very good, although 34.9% answered two of the three knowledge questions incorrectly. More than 70% of respondents agreed that confusion exists in all surveyed areas of polymyxin use. Almost all respondents (91.2%) agreed that a polymyxin guideline would be a helpful resource. CONCLUSIONS: This survey revealed objective and subjective variability in the use and perception of the polymyxins, and identified several areas in which they were being used contrary to the available evidence. The information provided herein lays the framework to harmonize clinical practice, guide future research and shape consensus guidelines.

Intravenous polymyxins: Revival with puzzle.

With the increasing incidence of multi-drug resistant strains, especially carbapenem resistant strains, polymyxsins (mainly colistin and polymyxin B) based regimens seem to be a revival as an effective treatment of last resort in these infections. Evidence from 47 clinical trials or case series we reviewed showed that polymyxins based regimens are effective and have less toxicity compared with previous trials. When used alone, the mortality of intravenous polymyxsins ranged from 0% to 74.3%, clinical response (cure and improvement) rate was 7-82.1%, and microbiological eradication was 27.3-73.9%. The main reasons for the combination therapy are to get potential synergistic effects and to prevent the selection of heteroresistant strains. Several studies showed combination therapy seemed to be more effective than monotherapy, though a few doubts remain. Clinically, polymyxsins can be used in combination with several antibiotics, such as carberpenem, sulbactam, tigecycline, fosfomycin, glycopeptide, rifampicin and so on, but the optimal combination regimen is yet to be confirmed. The optimal dose of polymyxins is also controversial. With the limited clinical evidence, it's suggested loading dose regimens may be more effective, but more attention should be paid to adverse effects. Although recommended in some studies, high dose polymxins regimens with inconsistent clinical evidence need more trials to confirm. It is important to note that concerning dosing regimens, colistin and polymyxin B are not quite the same. In renal impaired patients polymyxin B should be prescribed without dosing adjustment. Risk of renal failure may increase in the following situations, such as the combination of intravenous colistin plus intravenous vancomycin, higher doses-colistin, and intravenous colistin combined with inhalational colistin. In conclusion, there're still controversies in combination regimens, dosing strategies and so on. Prospective trials of lager sample size are needed.

Potential Toxicity of Polymyxins in Human Lung Epithelial Cells.

Inhaled polymyxins are of considerable utility in achieving optimal exposure in the respiratory tract for the treatment of lung infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. Current inhaled polymyxin therapy is empirical, and often large doses are used that may lead to potential pulmonary adverse effects. This study aimed to investigate the effect of polymyxins on human lung epithelial (A549) cells. The viability of A549 cells was examined after treatment with polymyxins by flow cytometry. Activation of caspases 3, 8, and 9, expression of Fas ligand (FasL), loss of mitochondrial membrane potential, and mitochondrial oxidative stress induced by polymyxin B were evaluated. The concentration of polymyxin B required to induce 50% of maximal cell death was 1.74 mM (95% confidence interval, 1.60 to 1.90 mM). Colistin was at least 2-fold less toxic than polymyxin B, while colistimethate was nontoxic. With 2.0 mM polymyxin B, 30.6% ± 11.5% (mean ± standard deviation) of the cells were apoptotic at 8 h and this increased to 71.3% ± 3.72% at 24 h. Concentration- and time-dependent activation of caspases 3, 8, and 9 was evident, while the activation of caspase 9 was more dramatic. Furthermore, polymyxin B caused concentration- and time-dependent FasL expression, production of mitochondrial reactive oxygen species, and changes in mitochondrial membrane potential. This is the first study to demonstrate that both extrinsic death receptor and intrinsic mitochondrial pathways are involved in polymyxin-induced toxicity in A549 cells. This knowledge base is critical for the development of novel strategies for the safe and effective inhalation therapy of polymyxins against Gram-negative "superbugs."

Clinical considerations for optimal use of the polymyxins: A focus on agent selection and dosing.

Polymyxins have remained the drug of choice for treatment due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli. Unfortunately, the utility of these agents has been limited by a lack of pharmacokinetic understanding, a high toxicity rate, and an extremely narrow therapeutic index. Significant advancements have been achieved in the understanding of the polymyxins over the past decade, and have led to the recognition of several differences between available intravenous formulations. The purpose of this review is to discuss the implications of these differences, assess comparative efficacy and safety of the polymyxins, and provide recommendations for polymyxin dosing and selection.

Old antibiotics for multidrug-resistant pathogens: from in vitro activity to clinical outcomes.

Antimicrobial resistance is a major and emerging threat worldwide. New antimicrobials have been unable to meet the resistance challenge, and treatment options are limited for a growing number of resistant pathogens. More and more clinicians are relying on older antimicrobials for the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. Some older antimicrobials have maintained excellent in vitro activity against highly resistant pathogens. In some instances, use of older agents is limited by unfavourable pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics and/or toxicities. In general, clinical data pertaining to the use of older agents for the treatment of MDR pathogens are scarce. Research efforts should be focused on the evaluation of older agents for the treatment of MDR pathogens as well as evaluating how these agents perform in complex patient populations with various and multiple co-morbid conditions.