A study comparing the effect of premedication with intravenous midazolam or dexmedetomidine on ketamine-fentanyl sedoanalgesia in burn patients: A randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Dressing changes and wound care-debridement procedures often cause fear and anxiety in burn patients, as these processes are quite painful. In order to determine the best method for alleviating pain during these procedures, the current study compared the efficacy and safety of intravenous dexmedetomidine and midazolam for premedication prior to these painful burn care procedures. METHODS: This comparative and randomized study included patients who had a burn size of 1563%, were aged 1870 years, were diagnosed with the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status (ASA I-II), and who underwent painful burn care procedures. Patients were intravenously administered either 1 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine (Group 1) or 0.03 mg/kg midazolam (Group 2) prior to the burn care procedure. Recorded at predetermined time points for each patient were heart rhythm (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), standard bispectral index (BIS), and Ramsay Sedation Scale (RSS). RESULTS: In the dexmedetomidine group, HR and MAP measurements of patients ​​at the 3rd, 5th, and 10th mins during sedation were significantly lower than the baseline values (p < 0.05). A significant decrease in SpO2 was observed in both groups at the 10th min during sedation, but the decline was higher in the midazolam group (p < 0.05). BIS measurements of the patients in both groups were significantly lower at 10 min. during sedation and at 15th and 60th mins during the procedure (p < 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the group (p > 0.05). The RSS scales of both groups in during the sedation were higher in the 3rd, 5th and 10th mins than the baseline values (p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference between the groups (p > 0.05). The RSS scales of groups in during the burn procedure were significantly higher at 15 th min than the 0 th values, while the RSS scales of both groups were significantly lower in the 45th and 60th mins (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Results of this study indicate that dexmedetomidine causes hemodynamic alterations while midazolam causes respiratory depression. However, these effects are not severe, and we conclude that both agents are safe and effective to ensure sedation prior to painful burn-care procedures.

Premedication practices for tracheal intubation in neonates transported by French medical transport teams: a prospective observational study.

OBJECTIVES: Premedication practices for neonatal tracheal intubations have not yet been described for neonatal transport teams. Our objective is to describe the use of sedation/analgesia (SA) for tracheal intubations and to assess its tolerance in neonates transported by medical transport teams in France. SETTING: This prospective observational study was part of the EPIPPAIN 2 project and collected around-the-clock data on SA practices in neonates intubated by all five paediatric medical transport teams of the Paris region during a 2-month period. Intubations were classified as emergent, semiemergent and non-emergent. Sedation level and conditions of intubation were assessed with the Tonus, Reactivity, Awareness and Conditions of intubation to Help in Endotracheal intubation Assessment (TRACHEA score). The scores range from 0 to 10 representing an increasing ladder from adequate to inadequate sedation, and from excellent to very poor conditions of intubation. PARTICIPANTS: 40 neonates intubated in 28 different centres. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age was 34.9 (3.9) weeks, and 62.5% were intubated in the delivery room. 30/40 (75%) of intubations were performed with the use of SA. In 18/30 (60.0%) intubations performed with SA, the drug regimen was the association of sufentanil and midazolam. Atropine was given in 19/40 intubations. From the 16, 21 and 3 intubations classified as emergent, semiemergent and non-emergent, respectively, 8 (50%), 19 (90.5%) and 3 (100%) were performed with SA premedication. 79.3% of intubations performed with SA had TRACHEA scores of 3 or less. 22/40 (55%) infants had at least one of the following adverse events: muscle rigidity, bradycardia below 100/min, desaturation below 80% and nose or pharynx-larynx bleeding. 7/24 (29.2%) of those who had only one attempt presented at least one of these adverse events compared with 15/16 (93.8%) of those who needed two or more attempts (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: SA premedication is largely feasible for tracheal intubations performed in neonates transported by medical transport teams including intubations judged as emergent or semiemergent. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01346813; Results.

Universal premedication and therapeutic drug monitoring for asparaginase-based therapy prevents infusion-associated acute adverse events and drug substitutions.

BACKGROUND: Asparaginase is a critical component of lymphoblastic leukemia therapy, with intravenous pegaspargase (PEG) as the current standard product. Acute adverse events (aAEs) during PEG infusion are difficult to interpret, representing a mix of drug-inactivating hypersensitivity and noninactivating reactions. Asparaginase Erwinia chrysanthemi (ERW) is approved for PEG hypersensitivity, but is less convenient, more expensive, and yields lower serum asparaginase activity (SAA). We began a policy of universal premedication and SAA testing for PEG, hypothesizing this would reduce aAEs and unnecessary drug substitutions. PROCEDURE: Retrospective chart review of patients receiving asparaginase before and after universal premedication before PEG was conducted, with SAA performed 1 week later. We excluded patients who had nonallergic asparaginase AEs. Primary end point was substitution to ERW. Secondary end points included aAEs, SAA testing, and cost. RESULTS: We substituted to ERW in 21 of 122 (17.2%) patients pre-policy, and 5 of 68 (7.4%) post-policy (RR, 0.427; 95% CI, 0.27-0.69, P = 0.028). All completed doses of PEG yielded excellent SAA (mean, 0.90 units/mL), compared with ERW (mean, 0.15 units/mL). PEG inactivation post-policy was seen in 2 of 68 (2.9%), one silent and one with breakthrough aAE. The rate of aAEs pre/post-policy was 17.2% versus 5.9% (RR, 0.342; 95% CI, 0.20-0.58, P = 0.017). Grade 4 aAE rate pre/post-policy was 15% versus 0%. Cost analysis predicts $125 779 drug savings alone per substitution prevented ($12 402/premedicated patient). CONCLUSIONS: Universal premedication reduced substitutions to ERW and aAE rate. SAA testing demonstrated low rates of silent inactivation, and higher SAA for PEG. A substantial savings was achieved. We propose universal premedication for PEG be standard of care.

Utilization rates of enoxaparin and heparin in deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis after education and electronic order change at a single institution: a quality improvement study.

Despite advantages of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), enoxaparin over heparin (UFH) for venous thromboembolism (VTE), a hospital's prescribing trends analysis showed use of each was about equal. In an attempt to increase LMWH over UFH use, electronic medical record (EMR) changes for medical service patients and education via multidisciplinary grand rounds was provided to all services. This was a unique opportunity to study LMWH and UFH use pre and post interventions at our institution. Citrix Pharmacy data was extracted for 3 months pre and post intervention (August 2016-February 2017). Inclusion criteria were age > 18 and LMWH or UFH VTE prophylaxis. Exclusion criteria were one time or duplicate orders and VTE treatment doses. Primary endpoint was hospital services VTE use with focus on medicine service which had both interventions compared to single intervention among all other services. LMWH use increased from 51 to 57.3% (p < 0.001) and UFH use decreased from 49 to 42.7% (p < 0.001) for all services. For medicine service, LMWH use increased 52.5-59.6% (p < 0.001) and UFH use decreased 47.5-40.4% (p < 0.001). For other services, LMWH use increased 48.8-53.6% (p = 0.005) and UFH use decreased 51.2-46.4% (p = 0.005). EMR changes and prescribers' grand rounds education resulted in 7.1% increase of LMWH use for medicine and 4.8% increase for all other services. The net increase (95% CI) in LMWH use in medicine service is 2.3% (- 1.91%, 6.56%) compared to the other services p = 0.281. Future studies are needed to reassess the effects of continued education and outcome of interventions.

Evaluation of Rapid vs Standard Infliximab Infusions in the Pediatric Population.

BACKGROUND: Rapid 1-hour infliximab infusions have been safely implemented in adults, but studies of these rapid infusions in pediatric patients are limited. This study's primary objective was to determine the safety of 1-hour infliximab infusions compared with standard 2- to 3-hour infusions in children with inflammatory bowel disease and other autoimmune disorders. METHODS: We conducted an institutional review board-approved prospective study using an unmatched historical control group at a freestanding children's hospital comparing rapid vs standard infusion rates of infliximab and the use of premedications and immunomodulatory agents on the frequency of early and delayed infusion reactions. RESULTS: There were 50 subjects with 540 total standard (2- to 3-hour) infusions in the retrospective group and 66 subjects with 545 total rapid (1-hour) infusions assessed in the prospective group. Although the prospective group received a significantly higher infliximab dose, was significantly less likely to receive premedication, and was significantly more likely to receive another immunomodulatory agent, only 2 instances of potential infusion reactions occurred in the 545 rapid infusions (0.36%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.22%-11.01%; 3% of patients) administered in the prospective group compared with 1 documented infusion reaction (0.19%; 95% CI, 0.0%-11.47%; 2% of patients) in the retrospective group (odds ratio, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.01-12.93; P = 0.99). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that rapid infusion of infliximab over 1 hour is not associated with an increased risk of infusion reactions when compared with standard 2- to 3-hour infusions and can be safely used in children with no previous reaction to standard infusions to treat inflammatory bowel disease and other autoimmune diseases.

Transition to Routine Premedication for Nonemergent Intubations in a Level IV Neonatal Intensive Care Unit.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to test whether implementing a guideline for nonemergent intubation improves the rate of premedication for nonemergent intubations in an academic level IV neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). We further sought to test the hypothesis that neonates who receive premedication for a nonemergent intubation have decreased pain scores at the time of intubation, fewer intubation attempts, and no associated adverse events. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective observational study with ongoing audit and feedback as well as statistical process control analysis. Data collection began on October 1, 2014. Clinical guideline implementation began in October 2015. A percent "P"-chart spanning seven-quarters was constructed with statistical process control analysis plotting premedication rates over time. Student's t-tests or Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used for secondary outcomes. RESULTS: The mean number of nonemergent intubations given premedications increased from 34 to 82%. The mean pain score was lower when premedications were given: 0.34 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.10-0.58) versus 2.8 (95% CI: 1.9-3.6) (p < 0.001). The number of intubation attempts did not differ with premedications. CONCLUSION: Adopting a guideline with supporting educational initiatives to standardize premedication before nonemergent intubations increased this practice. This regimen lowered clinical pain scores with no difference in the number of intubation attempts.

[A survey on premedication prior to intubation in very preterm infants (28-32WG) with respiratory distress syndrome in French neonatal intensive care units]. / Enquête nationale sur la sédation-analgésie pour intubation des grands prématurés atteints de détresse respiratoire en dehors de l'arrêt cardiorespiratoire et de la salle de naissance.

INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES: Tracheal intubation is a painful procedure for which the routine use of analgesia is recommended. However, the use of premedication for intubation is not yet generalized and there is great diversity in the drugs used. The main objective of this study was to describe the frequency of premedication use in preterm neonates aged between 28 and 32weeks of gestation, intubated for respiratory distress syndrome. Secondary objectives were to describe the existence of a written protocol, its influence on the frequency of premedication and the drugs used. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Declarative survey on Google.docs forms addressed to physicians and residents working in neonatal intensive care units in France. RESULTS: One hundred thirty respondents from 64 units completed this survey between 1 June and 31 July 2014. Fifty-seven percent of respondents declared always using a premedication, and 64 % of participants had a written protocol in their units. Persons working in a unit with a written protocol more frequently reported using premedication (P=0.04). The drugs used were various (mostly a hypnotic/morphine combination) and their dosages scattered. DISCUSSION: The results found by this survey confirm data from the literature and the situation seems to have stagnated over the last few years. A written protocol might encourage premedication use. CONCLUSION: Improvements in practices and increased knowledge are required to generalize the sedation/analgesia practices for tracheal intubation in neonatal intensive care units in France.

American Academy of Asthma, Allergy & Immunology membership experience with venom immunotherapy in chronic medical conditions and pregnancy, and in young children.

BACKGROUND: Few data exist regarding the use of venom immunotherapy (VIT) in specific high-risk chronic medical conditions and pregnancy, and in young children. METHODS: A Web-based survey was sent to American Academy of Asthma Allergy & Immunology members to explore their VIT experience in potential high-risk medical conditions and pregnancy, and in young children. Major problems were defined as "activation of underlying disease and/or VIT not well tolerated (systemic adverse events) and/or VIT discontinued for medical reasons." Results were expressed descriptively. RESULTS: A total of 697 of 5123 surveys (14%) were completed: 87% of the respondents were based in the United States, and 28% worked in an academic setting. Most respondents (71%) believed that pregnancy was a contraindication for starting VIT. Most were comfortable continuing VIT (51%) if the woman became pregnant after starting therapy. Of the allergists who treated children, many would give VIT down to age 5 years (42%) or younger, ages 1-4 years (35%). The following list is of the specific medical condition, the number of allergists who used VIT in patients with this condition, and the percentage who reported major problems: severe asthma, 212 (4.2%); hypertension, 287 (1.1%); coronary artery disease, 222 (3.6%); arrhythmias, 136 (3.4%); cerebrovascular disease, 104 (5.1%); cancer in remission, 166 (0%); cancer stable but still under treatment, 44 (7.2%); a history of bone marrow transplantation, 15 (4.9%); a history of solid organ transplantation, 29 (3.6%); human immunodeficiency virus, 53 (1.4%); acquired immunodeficiency syndrome, 24 (6.2%); stable autoimmune disease, 164 (2.8%); mastocytosis, 66 (18.4%); elevated serum tryptase, 101 (10.8%); immunodeficiency 59 (2.5%). CONCLUSION: Many allergists were comfortable using VIT in young children and continuing but not starting pregnant women on VIT. VIT was commonly used in patients with hypertension, coronary artery disease, arrhythmias, cancer in remission, and stable autoimmune disease. Major problems were most frequently reported in use with mastocytosis, elevated tryptase, and cancer still under treatment.

Burr-Hole Drainage for Chronic Subdural Hematoma Under Low-Dose Acetylsalicylic Acid: A Comparative Risk Analysis Study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical diseases typically affecting older people. Many of these patients have coronary artery disease and receive antiplatelet therapy, usually acetylsalicylic acid (ASA). Despite growing clinical relevance, there is still a lack of data focusing on the perioperative management of such patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to compare the perioperative and postoperative bleeding and cardiovascular complication rates of patients undergoing burr-hole drainage for cSDH with and without discontinuation of low-dose ASA. METHODS: Of 963 consecutive patients undergoing burr-hole drainage for cSDH, 198 (20.5%) patients were receiving low-dose ASA treatment. In 26 patients (13.1%), ASA was not discontinued (ASA group; ASA discontinuation ≤7 days); in the remaining patients (n = 172; 86.9%), ASA was discontinued at least for 7 days (control group). The primary outcome measure was recurrent cSDH that required revision surgery owing to clinical symptoms, whereas secondary outcome measures were postoperative cardiovascular and thromboembolic events, other complications, operation and hospitalization time, morbidity, and mortality. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was observed between the 2 groups regarding recurrence of cSDH (P = 1). Cardiovascular event rates, surgical morbidity, and mortality did not significantly differ between patients with and without discontinuation of low-dose ASA. CONCLUSION: Given the lack of guidelines regarding perioperative management with antiplatelet therapy, our findings elucidate one issue, showing comparable recurrence rates with and without discontinuation of low-dose ASA in patients undergoing burr-hole drainage for cSDH.

Determinants of Heparin Dosing and Complications in Patients Undergoing Left Atrial Ablation on Uninterrupted Rivaroxaban.

BACKGROUND: Patients on rivaroxaban have variable international normalized ratios (INRs) but it is uncertain if INR impacts procedural heparin requirement during left atrial ablation. We sought to examine the determinants of heparin dosing in this patient population. METHODS: We reviewed consecutive patients who received rivaroxaban within 24 hours of left atrial ablation and compared them to patients on uninterrupted warfarin. The determinants of heparin requirement were evaluated using regression analysis. We then tested a weight-based heparin dose prospectively in rivaroxaban patients. RESULTS: There were 258 patients on rivaroxaban and 213 on warfarin. The mean INR was 1.4 in the rivaroxaban group and 2.3 in the warfarin group (P < 0.01). To achieve an activated clotting time (ACT) >350 seconds, rivaroxaban patients required significantly more heparin (166.9 vs. 78.3 units/kg, P < 0.001). In the rivaroxaban group, body weight was the strongest predictor of heparin dose (r = 0.52), while INR was weakly correlated (r = -0.21). In the prospective group, 25 patients were given an initial heparin dose of 120 units/kg with 22/25 (88%) achieving an ACT > 300 seconds. There were seven and three cases of pericardial effusion in rivaroxaban and warfarin patients, respectively (P = 0.41). The average volume drained in the rivaroxaban group was elevated (988.6 vs. 275.0 mL, P = 0.21). CONCLUSIONS: Body weight is the strongest predictor of procedural heparin requirement during left atrial ablation in patients on uninterrupted rivaroxaban, even in those with an elevated INR. A heparin dose of 120 units/kg achieves an ACT > 300 seconds in the majority of patients. In cases of pericardial effusion, bleeding may be prolonged.

Does antiarrhythmic drugs premedication improve electrical cardioversion success in persistent atrial fibrillation?

AIMS: Aim of this study is to evaluate the impact of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) administration for at least one month before ECV on the acute and long term success rate of the procedure. METHODS: 1313 consecutive persistent AF patients were enrolled in 3 different centers (Turin, Asti and Avellino): 692 patients received AADs before and after ECV (group A), 621 patients were treated only after the procedure, at discharge (group B). Primary end point was the restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm acutely and at a long-term follow up. RESULTS: Acute ECV success was higher in group A compared with group B (99% vs. 88%, p=0.0001) and a fewer number of shock attempts were administered (1.15±0.42 vs. 1.27±0.53 p<0.0001). Moreover group A maintained SR more often than group B at one month (99% vs. 89%, log-rank p<0.0001), at one year (55% vs. 48% log-rank p=0.01) and at the end of follow up (mean 2.7±2.1years, 45% vs. 29%, log-rank p<0.0001). At multivariate analysis AADs premedication was the strongest independent predictor of acute and long-term ECV success (respectively p<0.0001 OR 10.71 CI 5.10-22.50 and p=0.004, OR 1.50 CI 1.14-1.97). At sensitivity analysis no differences were found between ADDs in terms of acute success improvement (p=0.605), number of shock attempts (p=0.853) and long term SR maintenance (log-rank p=0.480). CONCLUSIONS: AADs administration for at least 4weeks before the ECV in persistent AF increases significantly the acute success rate and this result was maintained over a long-term follow-up.

Influence of single-dose intravenous tranexamic acid on total hip replacement : A study on transfusions, collateral complications, and readmissions.

INTRODUCTION: To determine the effects of tranexamic acid (TXA) on transfusions in patients undergoing hip replacement with a hybrid or cementless prosthesis. METHODS: A group of 172 consecutive patients aged 18 years or older who underwent elective hip replacement with uncemented or hybrid prostheses, undergoing surgery between January 2012 and January 2014 by the same primary surgeon and anesthesiologist, were retrospectively included. TXA (1 g) was administered immediately before incision in the TXA group. Primary variables included number of red blood cell transfusions and the influence of TXA for each type of prosthesis. Secondary variables included hematocrit at discharge, length of hospital stay, thrombosis or pulmonary embolism, seizures, and death. RESULTS: Average transfusion was 1.53 units/patient in the control group compared to 0.6 units/patient in the TXA group (z = 6.29; U = 1640.5; p < 0.0001). TXA use was significantly correlated with the number of units transfused (p < 0.0001, 95% CI -1.24 to -0.68). Odds risk reduction for transfusion was observed during surgery (OR: 0.14; CI 0.06-0.29; p < 0.0001) and during the rest of hospital stay (OR: 0.11; CI 0.01-0.96; p = 0.046). Both hybrid and cementless prostheses that received TXA were transfused less than control groups (0.57 ± 1 vs. 1.7 ± 1 p < 0.01 and 0.65 ± 1 vs. 1.24 ± 1 p < 0.01). No difference was observed between the groups regarding adverse effects. Hematocrit values at discharge and length of hospital stay were similar between groups. No deaths were observed during hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: TXA reduced transfusions without increasing the prevalence of adverse effects. This reduction was observed during surgery and the following days of hospital stay for both for hybrid and cementless prosthesis.

Premedication Use Before Infliximab Administration: A Cross-sectional Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Premedications are commonly given to patients with inflammatory bowel disease before intravenous infliximab administration. We aimed to (1) describe practice variability; and (2) determine clinician rationale for premedicating patients with inflammatory bowel disease before infliximab administration. METHODS: We developed a cross-sectional electronic survey after comprehensive literature review to assess practice variability and clinician rationale for premedication use before infliximab. An optional postsurvey quiz assessed clinicians' understanding of the available literature. The survey was distributed through members-only NASPGHAN and Crohn's and Colitis Foundation of America (CCFA) listservs and American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) and American College of Gastroenterology (ACG) web-based discussion boards. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-nine unique respondents with a 93.3% survey completion rate comprised 331 (87%) and 45 (12%) pediatric and adult gastroenterologists. Among numerous options for premedications, acetaminophen (66%) and diphenhydramine (64%) were most often given before each infliximab infusion. Only 20% did not routinely use premedications. There was heterogeneity of premedication use between gastroenterologists within the same clinical practice. Of 328 (87%) respondents who completed the knowledge assessment quiz, only 18% identified the association of diphenhydramine use with increased reaction. CONCLUSIONS: There is high interpractice and intrapractice variability for premedication use before infliximab administration. Clinician rationale for premedicating patients seems to be driven by individual preference or group practice habit. Improved knowledge of the evidence may assist in decreasing overuse of premedications, particularly diphenhydramine.

Assessing the Efficacy of Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Multiply Injured Patients With High-Energy Pelvic and Extremity Fractures.

OBJECTIVES: Prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) is being increasingly used for reversing induced coagulopathy of trauma. However, the use of PCC for reversing coagulopathy in multiply injured patients with pelvic and/or lower extremity fractures remains unclear. The aim of our study was to assess the efficacy of PCC for reversing coagulopathy in this group of patients. DESIGN: Two-year retrospective analysis. SETTING: Our level I trauma center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: All coagulopathic [International normalized ratio (INR) ≥1.5] trauma patients. Patients with femur, tibia, or pelvic fracture were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups: PCC (single dose) and fresh frozen plasma (FFP). Patients in the 2 groups were matched using propensity score matching. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Time to correction of INR, time to intervention, development of thromboembolic complications, mortality, and cost of therapy. RESULTS: A total of 81 patients (PCC: 27, FFP: 54) were included. Patients who received PCC had faster correction of INR and shorter time to surgical intervention in comparison to patients who received FFP. PCC therapy was also associated with lower overall blood product requirement (P = 0.02) and lower transfusion costs (P = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In a matched cohort of multiply injured patients with pelvic and/or lower extremity fractures, administration of a single dose of PCC significantly reduced the time to correction of INR and time to intervention compared with patients who received FFP therapy. This may allow orthopaedic surgeons to more safely proceed with early, definitive fixation strategies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Effect of Prophylactic Antifungal Protocols on the Prognosis of Liver Transplantation: A Propensity Score Matching and Multistate Model Approach.

Background. Whether routine antifungal prophylaxis decreases posttransplantation fungal infections in patients receiving orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) remains unclear. This study aimed to determine the effectiveness of antifungal prophylaxis for patients receiving OLT. Patients and Methods. This is a retrospective analysis of a database at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. We have been administering routine antibiotic and prophylactic antifungal regimens to recipients with high model for end-stage liver disease scores (>20) since 2009. After propensity score matching, 402 patients were enrolled. We conducted a multistate model to analyze the cumulative hazards, probability of fungal infections, and risk factors. Results. The cumulative hazards and transition probability of "transplantation to fungal infection" were lower in the prophylaxis group. The incidence rate of fungal infection after OLT decreased from 18.9% to 11.4% (p = 0.052); overall mortality improved from 40.8% to 23.4% (p < 0.001). In the "transplantation to fungal infection" transition, prophylaxis was significantly associated with reduced hazards for fungal infection (hazard ratio: 0.57, 95% confidence interval: 0.34-0.96, p = 0.033). Massive ascites, cadaver transplantation, and older age were significantly associated with higher risks for mortality. Conclusion. Prophylactic antifungal regimens in high-risk recipients might decrease the incidence of posttransplant fungal infections.

Transfusion premedication practices among pediatric health care practitioners in Canada: results of a national survey.

BACKGROUND: Although not supported by strong evidence, premedication (pretransfusion medication) is commonly prescribed to patients who have had a transfusion reaction. The research questions were: 1) What are Canadian pediatric practitioners' views and practices regarding premedication and 2) what are barriers to reducing premedication overuse in pediatrics? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: An online survey targeted hematology/oncology, emergency medicine, general surgery, intensive care, and cardiac intensive care practitioners in all 16 Canadian pediatric tertiary hospitals. The survey included four sections: demographic, clinical, future directions, and organizational questions. RESULTS: Fifty-five individuals from 15 of 16 pediatric tertiary care sites completed the survey: 53 physicians and two nurse practitioners. More than half of the respondents (55%; 30/55) were pediatric hematology/oncology providers, and 35% (19/55) were directors of their respective divisions. Eighty-seven percent of respondents estimated that they premedicate up to 25% of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions, and 13% premedicate 26% to 50% RBC transfusions. Proportions were similar for platelet transfusions. Most respondents reported that trainees are involved in transfusion and premedication order decisions. Seven percent believe that their hospital does not use leukoreduction and 27% are not sure. Sixty-five percent of respondents were not aware of a clinical practice guideline or a standard order set (SOS) at their institution: 51% are interested in having both available. Factors influencing the decision to premedicate and barriers to change were identified. CONCLUSION: Premedication practices are variable in Canadian pediatric academic hospitals. Evidence-based premedication clinical practice guidelines and SOS could be explored as a way to standardize practices. There were perceived educational and institutional barriers to practice change.

Apixaban for periprocedural anticoagulation during catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 1691 patients.

PURPOSE: Apixaban, a direct factor Xa inhibitor recently approved for thromboembolic prophylaxis in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF), is increasingly used in patients undergoing catheter ablation of AF. However, large randomized studies supporting its use in the ablation context are still lacking. We undertook the present meta-analysis to assess the impact of apixaban in terms of thromboembolic and bleeding events in patients undergoing AF ablation as compared to warfarin. METHODS: MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane Library, and references reporting AF ablation and apixaban were screened and studies included if matching inclusion and exclusion criteria. RESULTS: One randomized and five nonrandomized studies were included in the analysis. Patients enrolled were 1691 patients (668 on apixaban and 1023 on warfarin). There was no heterogeneity in all the outcome comparisons. No deaths were reported. We did not observe any difference between apixaban and warfarin with respect to thromboembolic events (OR = 1.10, 95 % CI 0.24-5.16), major bleedings (OR = 1.56, 95 % CI 0.59-4.13), cardiac tamponade (OR 1.69, 95 % CI 0.52-5.54), minor bleedings (OR 0.96, 95 % CI 0.58-1.59), and the composite endpoint of death, thromboembolic events, and bleedings (OR 1.03, 95 % CI 0.65-1.64). CONCLUSIONS: The rates of death, thromboembolic events, major bleedings including cardiac tamponade, and minor bleedings in patients on apixaban undergoing AF ablation are very low and similar to that seen in patients treated with uninterrupted warfarin. Although primary driven by nonrandomized studies, these results support apixaban as periprocedural anticoagulation during AF ablation procedures.

Adherence to prophylaxis and bleeding outcome in haemophilia: a multicentre study.

Prevention of bleeding and joint damage in severe haemophilia is dependent on adherence to prophylactic replacement therapy. The aim of this study was to assess adherence to prophylaxis, including associations with age, bleeding and clotting factor consumption (CFC). In three Dutch haemophilia centres, semi-structured interviews about adherence to prophylaxis in the previous 2 weeks were conducted with patients or parents of a child with haemophilia. Patients were classified, according to pre-specified definitions, as adherent, sub-optimally adherent or non-adherent based on missing, timing, and dose of infusions. Association of annual bleeding rates, mean CFC, person performing the infusion (parents verus patients) with adherence categories were analysed. Overall, 241 patients with haemophilia using prophylaxis were studied. Parents were more adherent (66%; n = 48/73) than patients (43%; n = 72/168). Sub-optimal adherence occurred in 29% of parents and 37% of patients and was characterized by changes in timing of infusion (mostly from morning to evening), while missing <6% of infusions. Non-adherence occurred less often: in 5% of parents and 20% of patients. Reduced adherence was associated with lower CFC, but not with joint bleeding. In conclusion, non-adherence in haemophilia was relatively rare, yet 1/3 of patients struggled to administer prophylaxis at the appropriate time of day.

Current Practice of Pharmacological Thromboprophylaxis for Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized Children: A Survey of Pediatric Hemostasis and Thrombosis Experts in North America.

Pharmacological thromboprophylaxis (pTP) is the most effective intervention to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in hospitalized adults. High-quality studies investigating the role of pTP in children are lacking. The aim of this study is to understand pediatric hematologists' current practices of pTP prescription and to explore their opinion about universal adoption of pTP for high-risk hospitalized children. An electronic survey was sent to members of Hemostasis and Thrombosis Research Society of North America. The response rate was 47.3% (53/112). VTE was perceived as a major hospital acquired complication by all and 96% (51/53) prescribed pTP in select cases. Majority would consider prescribing pTP for personal history of thrombosis, inheritance of severe thrombophilic conditions, and teen age. The majority of respondents (55%, 29/53) were either not in support of or uncertain about the universal adoption of pTP policy for high-risk hospitalized children. In total, 62% of respondents (33/53) did not support the use of pTP for central venous lines. Respondents reported on the presence of pharmacological (32%, 17/53) and mechanical (45%, 24/53) thromboprophylaxis policies at their institutions. Pediatric hematologists considered pTP a useful intervention to prevent VTE and prescribed pTP in select cases. Universal adoption of pTP was not supported. Wide variability in clinical practice was observed.

Observational multicentric study to evaluate efficacy, adverse effects and acceptance of bowel cleansing prior to colonoscopy with sodium picosulfate / magnesium citrate formulation CitraFleet®.

The various efficient methods available for bowel preparation prior to colonoscopy differ in patient acceptance. Combining the laxative sodium picosulfate with hyperosmotic magnesium citrate, used in this study in the formulation CitraFleet(®), allows the uptake of the purgative substances as a solution of low volume. This observational study with 737 patients evaluated efficacy of bowel preparation, potential side or adverse effects and patient acceptance of this medicinal product when used by resident physicians in Germany.Colon cleansing with CitraFleet(®) was considered very good to sufficient in 95.2 % of the patients and inadequate in only 4.8 %. In 75 % of the colonoscopies, bowel preparation was rated very good or good. Compared to the standard regimen of two portions taken the day before endoscopy, cleaning efficacy was better when patients received one of the doses on the morning of the day of colonoscopy. The quality of bowel preparation was rated lower by gastroenterologists without any prior experience with sodium picosulfate/magnesium citrate. The overall assessment of the colon cleansing procedure by the 76 participating physicians was very positive and patient acceptance was also very high which can be considered a clear advantage over alternative methods. Efficacy of colon cleansing with CitraFleet(®) was not substantially affected by typical deviations from the recommended standard procedure, emphasizing the robustness of the method. Only one of the patients reported a mild adverse effect potentially caused by the cleansing agents.