Dichotic listening and interhemispheric integration after callosotomy: A systematic review.

The right-ear advantage (REA) for recalling dichotically presented auditory-verbal stimuli has been traditionally linked to the dominance of the left cerebral hemisphere for speech processing. Early studies on patients with callosotomy additionally found that the removal of the corpus callosum leads to a complete extinction of the left ear, and consequently the today widely used models to explain the REA assume a central role of callosal axons for recalling the left-ear stimulus in dichotic listening. However, later dichotic-listening studies on callosotomy patients challenge this interpretation, as many patients appear to be able to recall left-ear stimuli well above chance level, albeit with reduced accuracy. The aim of the present systematic review was to identify possible experimental and patient variables that explain the inconsistences found regarding the effect of split-brain surgery on dichotic listening. For this purpose, a systematic literature search was conducted (databases: Pubmed, Web of Knowledge, EBSChost, and Ovid) to identify all empirical studies on patients with surgical section of the corpus callosum (complete or partial) that used a verbal dichotic-listening paradigm. This search yielded ks = 32 publications reporting patient data either on case or group level, and the data was analysed by comparing the case-level incidence of left-ear suppression, left-ear extinction, and right-ear enhancement narratively or statistically considering possible moderator variables (i.a., extent of the callosal surgery, stimulus material, response format, selective attention). The main finding was an increased incidence of left-ear suppression (odds ratio = 7.47, CI95%: [1.21; 83.49], exact p = .02) and right-ear enhancement (odds ratio = 21.61, CI95%: [4.40; 154.11], p < .01) when rhyming as compared with non-rhyming stimuli were used. Also, an increase in left-ear reports was apparent when a response by the right hemisphere was allowed (i.e., response with the left hand). While the present review is limited by the overall small number of cases and a lack of an appropriate control sample in most of the original studies, the findings nevertheless suggest an adjustment of the classical dichotic-listening models incorporating right-hemispheric processing abilities as well as the perceptual competition of the left- and right-ear stimuli for attention.

Preservation of electrophysiological functional connectivity after partial corpus callosotomy: case report.

Prior studies of functional connectivity following callosotomy have disagreed in the observed effects on interhemispheric functional connectivity. These connectivity studies, in multiple electrophysiological methods and functional MRI, have found conflicting reductions in connectivity or patterns resembling typical individuals. The authors examined a case of partial anterior corpus callosum connection, where pairs of bilateral electrocorticographic electrodes had been placed over homologous regions in the left and right hemispheres. They sorted electrode pairs by whether their direct corpus callosum connection had been disconnected or preserved using diffusion tensor imaging and native anatomical MRI, and they estimated functional connectivity between pairs of electrodes over homologous regions using phase-locking value. They found no significant differences in any frequency band between pairs of electrodes that had their corpus callosum connection disconnected and those that had an intact connection. The authors' results may imply that the corpus callosum is not an obligatory mediator of connectivity between homologous sites in opposite hemispheres. This interhemispheric synchronization may also be linked to disruption of seizure activity.

Geometry, landmarks and the cerebral hemispheres: 2D spatial reorientation in split-brain patients.

A right-hemispheric superiority in spatial encoding based on geometric cues has been largely documented in a variety of species, together with a left-hemispheric specialization for encoding based on landmarks. In humans, hemispheric asymmetries for spatial encoding have been little explored. In this study, we compared a patient with a complete callosal resection (D.D.C.) and a patient with a wide callosal resection saving the splenium (A.P.), with healthy participants. In two 2D versions of the 'reorientation task', participants were asked to find the target corner of a rectangle-shaped environment, by exploiting either geometric information alone or the combination of geometric and landmark information. In Experiment 1, the landmark consisted of a coloured side of the rectangle; in Experiment 2, this cue was replaced by a coloured disc located inside the rectangle. In both experiments, the rectangular shape ensured the geometric cue. D.D.C. was always unable to recall the target, whereas A.P. correctly solved the task when only the geometric information was available, without difference with respect to the controls. Importantly, the performance of A.P. did not differ from controls' when the right hemisphere was tested with the landmark cues (the task being carried out using the left hand), whereas when the left hemisphere was tested (right-hand session) his performance was worse than controls' with the coloured side of the space, but it was better than controls' with the coloured disc. The results are discussed comparing them with data collected on other species, and with theories of spatial processing.

Corpus Callosotomy for Intractable Epilepsy Revisited: The Children's Hospital of Michigan Series.

Corpus callosotomy is a palliative procedure performed to reduce the severity of drug-resistant epilepsy. The authors assessed its efficacy on different seizure types in 20 subjects (age range 5-19 years); 8 with active vagus nerve stimulator. Fifteen had complete callosotomy, 3 had anterior 2/3, and 2 had anterior 2/3 followed later by complete callosotomy. Ten had endoscopic approach. In all, 65% had ≥ 50% reduction of generalized seizures leading to falls (atonic, tonic, myoclonic); 35% became seizure-free (follow-up period: 6 months to 9 years; mean 3 years). Seizure outcome distribution was better for generalized than for partial seizures ( P = .003). Endoscopic approach was as effective as transcranial approach. Seven subjects who failed vagus nerve stimulator therapy responded with ≥50% seizure reduction. Corpus callosotomy is an effective treatment for intractable generalized epilepsy leading to falls with significant seizure reduction or even elimination of seizures, in the majority of children.

Microsurgical anatomy of the white matter tracts in hemispherotomy.

BACKGROUND: Hemispherotomy is a surgical procedure performed for refractory epileptic seizures due to wide hemispheric damage. OBJECTIVE: To describe the microanatomy of the white matter tracts transected in a hemispherotomy and the relationship of the surgical landmarks used during the intraventricular callosotomy. METHODS: The cortical and subcortical structures were examined in 32 hemispheres. RESULTS: Incision of the temporal stem along the inferior limiting sulcus crosses the insulo-opercular fibers, uncinate, inferior occipitofrontal and middle longitudinal fasciculi, anterior commissure, and optic and auditory radiations. The incision along the superior limiting sulcus transects insulo-opercular fibers and the genu and posterior limb of internal capsule. The incision along the anterior limiting sulcus crosses the insulo-opercular fibers, anterior limb of the internal capsule, anterior commissure, and the anterior thalamic bundle. The disconnection of the posterior part of the corpus callosum may be incomplete if the point at which the last cortical branch of the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) turns upward and disappears from the view through the intraventricular exposure is used as the landmark for estimating the posterior extent of the callosotomy. This ACA branch turns upward before reaching the posterior edge of the splenium in 85% of hemispheres. The falx, followed to the posterior edge of the splenium, is a more reliable landmark for completing the posterior part of an intraventricular callosotomy. CONCLUSION: The fiber tracts disconnected in hemispherotomy were reviewed. The falx is a more reliable guide than the ACA in completing the posterior part of the intraventricular callosotomy.

Outcomes after anterior or complete corpus callosotomy in children.

BACKGROUND: Corpus callosotomy (CC) is a valuable palliative surgical option for children with medically refractory epilepsy due to generalized or multifocal cortical seizure onset. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the extent of CC resulting in optimal seizure control in a pediatric patient population and to evaluate the modification of seizure profile after various CC approaches. METHODS: The records of 58 children (3-22 years of age at the time of surgery) with medically refractory epilepsy who underwent CC between 1995 and 2011 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Anterior two thirds callosotomy resulted in resolution of absence (P = .03) and astatic (P = .03) seizures, whereas anterior two thirds callosotomy followed by second-stage completion resulted in resolution of generalized tonic-clonic (GTC) (P = .03), astatic (P = .005), and myoclonic (P = .03) seizures in addition to a trend toward resolution of absence seizures (P = .08). Single-stage upfront complete callosotomy resulted in resolution of absence (P = .002), astatic (P < .0001), myoclonic (P = .007), and complex partial (P = .008) seizures in addition to a trend toward resolution of GTC (P = .06). In comparing a composite of subjects who underwent anterior two thirds callosotomy alone or 2-stage complete callosotomy before the second stage to complete the callosotomy with subjects who underwent upfront complete CC, a more favorable outcome was found in those with the upfront complete CC (P = .02). CONCLUSION: Single-stage upfront complete callosotomy is effective in relieving a broader spectrum of seizure types than anterior two thirds callosotomy or 2-stage complete callosotomy in children. The advantages of single-stage complete callosotomy must be weighed against the potentially higher risk of neurological and operative complications.

Centro-median stimulation yields additional seizure frequency and attention improvement in patients previously submitted to callosotomy.

RATIONALE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has been increasingly used in the treatment of refractory epilepsy over the last decade. We report on the outcome after thalamic centro-median (CM) DBS in patients with generalized epilepsy who had been previously treated with extended callosal section. METHODS: Four consecutive patients with generalized epilepsy who were previously submitted to callosal section and had at least 1 year of follow-up after deep brain implantation were studied. Age ranged from 19 to 44 years. All patients were submitted to bilateral CM thalamic DBS. Post-operative CT scans documented the electrode position in all patients. All patients had pre- and post-stimulation prolonged interictal scalp EEG recordings, including spike counts. Attention level was evaluated by means of the SNAP-IV questionnaire. The pre-implantation anti-epileptic drug regimen was maintained post-operatively in all patients. RESULTS: Post-operative CT documented that all electrodes were correctly located. There was no morbidity or mortality. Seizure frequency reduction ranging from 65 to 95% and increased attention level was seen in all patients. Interictal spiking frequency was reduced from 25 to 95%, but their morphology remained the same. There was re-synchronization of interictal discharges during slow-wave sleep in 2 patients. CONCLUSION: All patients benefit from the procedure. The CM seems to play a role in modulating the epileptic discharges and attention in these patients. On the other hand, it is not the generator of the epileptic abnormality and appeared not to be involved in non-REM sleep-related interictal spiking modulation.

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of anterior corpus callosotomy with keyhole in refractory seizures.

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anterior corpus callosotomy with a keyhole approach on refractory seizures and to evaluate this procedure for drop attacks (DAs) and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCSs). METHODS: All refractory seizure patients underwent anterior corpus callosotomy (n=31) without other epilepsy surgery. Seizure response and procedure complications were evaluated. RESULTS: Seizure types included GTCS (n=26), and atonic or tonic seizures with DA (n=9). In GTCS patients, 84.6% had >or=50% decrease in seizure frequency, and 61.5% had >or=80% reduction. In DA patients, 77.8% had >or=50% decrease in seizure frequency, and 55.6% had >or=80% reduction. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in final efficacy. Overall complication rate for corpus callosotomy was 12.9%, the permanent complication rate was 3.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Anterior corpus callosotomy with a keyhole approach produces highly favorable outcomes for both GTCS and atonic or tonic seizures with a low risk for complications.

Repeat magnetoencephalography and surgeries to eliminate atonic seizures of non-lesional frontal lobe epilepsy.

A 7-year-old boy presented with intractable head nodding and atonic seizures since the age of 3 years and severe behavior problems unsuitable for video EEG monitoring. We performed magnetoencephalography (MEG) 4 times: before (1) corpus callosotomy, (2) left frontal cortical resection with multiple subpial transection and (3) resection of residual MEG spike sources, which eliminated seizures. Repeat MEGs consistently localized the epileptogenic zone in a patient with intractable residual non-lesional left frontal lobe epilepsy.

The calculating hemispheres: studies of a split-brain patient.

The purpose of the study was to investigate simple calculation in the two cerebral hemispheres of a split-brain patient. In a series of four experiments, the left hemisphere was superior to the right in simple calculation, confirming the previously reported left hemisphere specialization for calculation. In two different recognition paradigms, right hemisphere performance was at chance for all arithmetic operations, with the exception of subtraction in a two-alternative forced choice paradigm (performance was at chance when the lure differed from the correct answer by a magnitude of 1 but above chance when the magnitude difference was 4). In a recall paradigm, the right hemisphere performed above chance for both addition and subtraction, but performed at chance levels for multiplication and division. The error patterns in that experiment suggested that for subtraction and addition, the right hemisphere does have some capacity for approximating the solution even when it is unable to generate the exact solution. Furthermore, right hemisphere accuracy in addition and subtraction was higher for problems with small operands than with large operands. An additional experiment assessed approximate and exact addition in the two hemispheres for problems with small and large operands. The left hemisphere was equally accurate in both tasks but the right hemisphere was more accurate in approximate addition than in exact addition. In exact addition, right hemisphere accuracy was higher for problems with small operands than large, but the opposite pattern was found for approximate addition.

The mind-brain relation and neuroscientific foundations: III. Brain and psychopathology, the split brain, and dreaming.

In addition to the findings of neuroscientific research on brain function, reviewed in the previous articles (Meissner, 2006a, 2006b), contemporary findings relevant to the mind-brain relation derive also from the study of the underlying patterns of brain dysfunction related to various forms of psychopathology. Other information derives from study of split-brain conditions and from research on dream processes and their relation to brain mechanisms. Review of these research findings casts further light on aspects of the mind-brain relation and further substantiates a unified theory of mind-brain integration.