Gender-affirming hormone treatment modalities for transfemale & non-binary transfeminine individuals: A UK perspective.

Gender incongruence and the number of people seeking gender affirming hormone treatment has dramatically risen in the last two decades. In the UK, transgender women and non-binary transfeminine individuals are typically treated with simultaneous suppression of endogenous testosterone production through anti-androgens and exogenous oestradiol replacement. Oestrogen replacement comes in different forms and is primarily given as transdermal (gel or patch) or oral preparations in the UK. Decisions around preparation choice are based on a combination of individual preference and/or mitigating the chance of complications based on individual risk profiles. Time frames to achieve female physical changes are largely predictable and managing expectations of individuals prior to commencing treatment is highly important. Common complications include venous thromboembolism, liver dysfunction and effects on fertility, thus individuals should be thoroughly counselled prior to commencing treatment. This article provides an overview of the management and considerations of gender-affirming hormone treatment in transgender women and non-binary transfeminine individuals.

The Role of Sex and Gender in Transgender Bone and Other Musculoskeletal Health.

ABSTRACT: Musculoskeletal changes occur with gender-affirming hormonal therapy (GAHT) and gender-affirming surgery (GAS) used in the care of transgender adolescents and adults. Survey results have shown that orthopaedic surgeons desire to care for transgender individuals but express concern over a knowledge deficit. This article reviews the physiology and pathophysiology that may occur with GAHT and GAS. Transgender women have lower bone mineral density (BMD) prior to GAHT than cisgender men. Limited fracture data would suggest that transgender women >50 years of age have fracture rates similar to those of cisgender women. Transgender men have normal BMD prior to GAHT and are not at an increased risk for fracture compared with cisgender women. The use of puberty-blocking medications in the care of transgender youth does result in a decline in BMD, which returns to baseline with GAHT, but the effect of delaying puberty on maximal BMD and the lifetime fracture risk are unknown. At present, dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is used to measure BMD and assess fracture risk. Attention should be paid to using the appropriate reference group in the interpretation of DXA for transgender individuals. Promote musculoskeletal health by ensuring appropriate calcium, vitamin D, weight-bearing activity, and a healthy lifestyle. Adherence to GAHT needs to be encouraged to avoid bone loss. Data with regard to therapy for osteoporosis in transgender patients have been lacking, but, at present, use of available therapies is expected to be effective. Information with regard to differences in other musculoskeletal health issues such as joint injuries has been lacking in transgender individuals.

Effect of testosterone therapy on breast tissue composition and mammographic breast density in trans masculine individuals.

BACKGROUND: The effect of gender-affirming testosterone therapy (TT) on breast cancer risk is unclear. This study investigated the association between TT and breast tissue composition and breast tissue density in trans masculine individuals (TMIs). METHODS: Of the 444 TMIs who underwent chest-contouring surgeries between 2013 and 2019, breast tissue composition was assessed in 425 TMIs by the pathologists (categories of lobular atrophy and stromal composition) and using our automated deep-learning algorithm (% epithelium, % fibrous stroma, and % fat). Forty-two out of 444 TMIs had mammography prior to surgery and their breast tissue density was read by a radiologist. Mammography digital files, available for 25/42 TMIs, were analyzed using the LIBRA software to obtain percent density, absolute dense area, and absolute non-dense area. Linear regression was used to describe the associations between duration of TT use and breast tissue composition or breast tissue density measures, while adjusting for potential confounders. Analyses stratified by body mass index were also conducted. RESULTS: Longer duration of TT use was associated with increasing degrees of lobular atrophy (p < 0.001) but not fibrous content (p = 0.82). Every 6 months of TT was associated with decreasing amounts of epithelium (exp(ß) = 0.97, 95% CI 0.95,0.98, adj p = 0.005) and fibrous stroma (exp(ß) = 0.99, 95% CI 0.98,1.00, adj p = 0.05), but not fat (exp(ß) = 1.01, 95%CI 0.98,1.05, adj p = 0.39). The effect of TT on breast epithelium was attenuated in overweight/obese TMIs (exp(ß) = 0.98, 95% CI 0.95,1.01, adj p = 0.14). When comparing TT users versus non-users, TT users had 28% less epithelium (exp(ß) = 0.72, 95% CI 0.58,0.90, adj p = 0.003). There was no association between TT and radiologist's breast density assessment (p = 0.58) or LIBRA measurements (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: TT decreases breast epithelium, but this effect is attenuated in overweight/obese TMIs. TT has the potential to affect the breast cancer risk of TMIs. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the effect of TT on breast density and breast cancer risk.

The implications of hormone treatment for cancer risk, screening and treatment in transgender individuals.

There is evidence that gender-affirming hormone treatment (GAHT) for transgender individuals modulates their risk for specific malignancies including breast and prostate cancer, and meningiomas. However, there is insufficient data to make precise risk estimates accounting for age and inherited cancer risk. As such, screening recommendations remain broad. Even less evidence exists for best practice in the management of active or historical cancers in the transgender population. Guidance is therefore mainly extrapolated from cisgender populations but with considerations of the significant benefits of GAHT in the face of any hormonal risk. Clinical experience, the multidisciplinary team and shared decision making with the patient are vital in providing person-centred care, while further research is acquired.

Testosterone and other treatments for transgender males and non-binary trans masculine individuals.

Testosterone therapy is the main hormonal treatment offered in transmen to alleviate somatic gender dysphoria. Testosterone can be administered via topical or injectable preparations to achieve physical changes resulting in masculinisation and improve quality of life for the treated individuals. The aim of our paper is to outline methods for testosterone replacement, their impact on main body systems of transmen, potential associated health risks and long term follow up. Androgen use in transgender medicine is safe with appropriate endocrine guidance and monitoring. Studies with longer follow-up period, including those who may prefer low dose testosterone, interested in pregnancy or older people may further improve the management of female-to-male transgender persons.

Uterine changes in transgender men receiving testosterone therapy.

OBJECTIVES: Despite regular gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT), the presence of uterine bleeding can occur occasionally and cause profound discomfort. This study aimed to evaluate the histologic features and immunohistochemical expression of estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR), and androgen receptors (AR) in the endometrium and myometrium of transgender men receiving testosterone therapy and relate them to clinical and hormonal characteristics. DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. METHODS: Thirty-four transgender men undergoing gender-affirming surgery were included. Clinical, sociodemographic, and laboratory data as well as anatomopathological and immunohistochemical findings were evaluated. RESULTS: The participants' mean age was 42.35 (SD, 10.00) years, and body mass index was 28.16 (SD, 5.52) kg/m2. The mean GAHT duration before surgery was 5.36 (SD, 3.24) years. The mean testosterone levels were 814.98 (SD, 407.13) ng/dL, and estradiol levels were 55.22 (SD, 25.27) pg/mL. The endometrium was atrophic in 61.8%, proliferative in 17.6%, and secretory in 20.6%. Immunohistochemical receptor analysis revealed that endometrial epithelial cells expressed ER (90%) and PR (80%), with a lower expression of AR (30%). In stromal tissue, the median ER, PR, and AR expression was lower than that in the epithelium (60%, 70%, and 25%, respectively). The myometrium showed high expression of PR (90%) and ER (70%), with the highest expression of AR (65%) being localized to this region. CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, GAHT induced an atrophic condition of the endometrium in two-thirds of the transgender men, with a limited AR expression in the endometrial region. The present results suggest that testosterone-based GAHT for a mean of 5 years is safe in transgender men achieving amenorrhea.

Sexual health in transgender and gender diverse people.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Sexual health and sexual function are critical to the wellbeing of cisgender, transgender, and gender diverse populations. To date, there has been only limited patient-focused evaluation of sexual function in transgender and gender diverse patients at several stages in their gender-affirming medical care. There remains a need to better understand the impact of gender affirming medical and surgical therapy on sexual health, and to develop evidence-based treatments to address sexual dysfunction when present. RECENT FINDINGS: The impact of gender-affirming hormone therapy on sexual health is complex and evolves over time on treatment. Despite high incidences of complications, major genital gender-affirming surgeries such as vulvovaginoplasty and penile implant placement after phalloplasty yield high patient satisfaction. While treatments to preserve or restore erections and to improve vaginal lubrication have been trialed based upon literature in cisgender populations, there remains minimal evidence to guide medical treatment of sexual dysfunction ranging from erectile dysfunction to dyspareunia. SUMMARY: There is a continued need for ongoing efforts to develop patient-reported outcome measures and rigorous investigation of sexual health preservation and restoration treatments in transgender and gender diverse populations.

Transgender and Nonbinary Individuals' Perceptions Regarding Gender-Affirming Hormone Therapy and Cardiovascular Health: A Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Transgender and nonbinary individuals face substantial cardiovascular health uncertainties. The use of gender-affirming hormone therapy can be used to achieve one's gender-affirming goals. As self-rated health is an important predictor of health outcomes, an understanding of how this association is perceived by transgender and nonbinary individuals using gender-affirming hormone therapy is required. The objective of this research was to explore transgender and nonbinary individuals' perceptions of cardiovascular health in the context of using gender-affirming hormone therapy. METHODS: In this qualitative study, English-speaking transgender and nonbinary adults using gender-affirming hormone therapy for 3 months or more were recruited from across Canada using purposive and snowball sampling methods. Semistructured interviews were conducted through videoconference to explore transgender and nonbinary individuals' perceptions of the association between gender-affirming hormone therapy and cardiovascular health between May and August 2023. Data were transcribed verbatim, and transcripts were analyzed independently by 3 reviewers using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-one participants were interviewed (8 transgender women, 9 transgender men, and 3 nonbinary individuals; median [range] age, 27 [20-69] years; 80% White participants). Three main themes were identified: cardiovascular health was not a primary concern in the decision-making process with regard to gender-affirming hormone therapy, the improved well-being associated with gender-affirming hormone therapy was felt to contribute to improved cardiovascular health, and health care provider knowledge and attitude facilitate the transition process. CONCLUSIONS: Gender-affirming hormone therapy in transgender and nonbinary individuals is perceived to improve cardiovascular health. Given the positive associations between care aligned with patient priorities, self-rated health, and health outcomes, these findings should be considered as part of shared decision-making and person-centered care.

Metabolic and cardiovascular risks of hormone treatment for transgender individuals.

Identifying metabolic and cardiovascular risks of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) is challenging due to other confounding variables that affect patient outcomes and the diversity of treatment regimes. Masculinising hormone therapy produces atherogenic lipid profiles, while effects on other metabolic parameters are not consistent. There is insufficient evidence to conclude if cardiovascular disease risk among transmen is increased. The effects of feminising hormone therapy on metabolic parameters do not demonstrate a consistent pattern in the available literature. However, the risk of venous thromboembolism is greater in transwomen than in cis-gender men and women with a possible increase in cardiovascular disease risk. It is recommended to discuss the potential effects of GAHT on cardiovascular health and encourage patients seeking GAHT to adopt a healthy lifestyle. Performing baseline and periodic assessments of cardiovascular risk factors would enable early identification and interventions. In high-risk individuals, the cardiovascular effects of hormonal regimes might impact the treatment decision.

Thrombotic risk associated with gender-affirming hormone therapy.

Transgender and gender-expansive (TG) people-those who identify with a gender other than their assigned sex at birth-frequently experience gender dysphoria, which is associated with negative health outcomes. One key strategy for improving gender dysphoria is the use of gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT): estrogen for feminization and testosterone for masculinization. Estrogen use in cisgender women is associated with well-established changes in hemostatic parameters, including increases in prothrombotic factors and decreases in inhibitors of coagulation. Cisgender women using estrogen have an increased risk of thrombosis. Studies of thrombosis risk associated with estrogen GAHT in TG people are less robust, with some studies limited by the use of hormones and hormone management strategies that are no longer recommended. However, TG women using estrogen appear to be at increased risk of both arterial and venous thrombosis, which may increase with longer time on estrogen. Testosterone use in both cisgender and transgender men is associated with increases in hemoglobin and hematocrit, which can lead to erythrocytosis and thus increased risk of thrombosis. The results of studies evaluating thrombosis risk in the setting of testosterone use are mixed. This review presents an overview of alterations in hemostatic parameters and thrombosis risk associated with use of exogenous estrogen and testosterone. Understanding what is known and unknown about thrombosis risk associated with use of these hormones is essential for hematologists who may be asked to evaluate TG people and provide guidance on management of those who may be at increased risk of thrombosis.

Gender-affirming hormone therapy and cardiovascular health in transgender adults.

A growing number of people identify as transgender and gender non-binary in the USA and worldwide. Concomitantly, an increasing number of patients are receiving gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) to achieve gender congruence. GAHT has far-ranging effects on clinical and subclinical markers of cardiovascular risk. Transgender patients also appear to be at higher risk for cardiovascular diseases compared to their cisgender peers and the impact of gender-affirming therapy on cardiovascular health is unclear. Studies on the effect of GAHT on cardiovascular outcomes are confounded by differences in GAHT regimens and methodological challenges in a diverse and historically hard-to-reach population. Current cardiovascular guidelines do not incorporate gender identity and hormone status into risk stratification and clinical decision-making. In this review, we provide an overview on the cardiometabolic impact and clinical considerations of GAHT for cardiovascular risk in transgender patients.

Association between serum estradiol and cardiovascular health among transgender adults using gender-affirming estrogen therapy.

Gender-affirming estrogen therapy (GAET) is commonly used for feminization in transgender and nonbinary (TNB) individuals, yet the optimal rate of change (ROC) in estradiol levels for cardiovascular health is unclear. We examined the association between serum estradiol levels and cardiovascular-related mortality, adverse events, and risk factors in TNB adults using GAET. Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science were systematically searched (inception-April 2023) for original articles reporting serum estradiol levels and cardiovascular-related mortality, adverse events, and risk factors in TNB adults using GAET. Data extraction was completed in duplicate following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Stratified random effect meta-analyses using serum estradiol ROC (serum estradiolbaseline - serum estradiolfollow-up/study duration) was used to assess longitudinal studies (low, 0 < ROC ≤ 1 pg/mL/mo; moderate, 1 < ROC ≤ 3 pg/mL/mo; high, ROC ≥ 3 pg/mL/mo). Thirty-five studies (13 cross-sectional, 19 cohort, and 3 trials) were included. Two studies collectively reported 50 cardiovascular-related deaths, and four collectively reported 23 adverse cardiovascular events. Nineteen studies reporting cardiovascular risk factors were meta-analyzed by ROC stratum (low = 5; moderate = 6; high = 8), demonstrating an association between moderate [0.40, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.22, 0.59 kg/m2, I2 = 28.2%] and high (0.46, 95% CI: 0.15, 0.78 kg/m2; I2 = 0.0%) serum estradiol ROC and increased body mass index. High (-6.67, 95% CI: -10.65, -2.68 mg/dL; I2 = 0.0%) serum estradiol ROC was associated with decreased low-density lipoproteins. Low (-7.05, 95% CI: -10.40, -3.70 mmHg; I2 = 0.0%) and moderate (-3.69, 95% CI: -4.93, -2.45 mmHg; I2 = 0.0%) serum estradiol ROCs were associated with decreases in systolic blood pressure. In TNB adults using GAET, serum estradiol ROC may influence cardiovascular risk factors, which may have implications for clinical cardiovascular outcomes.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In this systematic review and meta-analysis of 35 studies involving 7,745 participants, high rates of serum estradiol change were associated with small increases in body mass index. Moderate to high rates of change were associated with decreases in low-density lipoprotein. Low rates of change were associated with small decreases in systolic blood pressure. Rate of serum estradiol change in adults using gender-affirming estrogen therapy may influence cardiovascular risk factors, though further research is warranted.

Persistent vaginal bleeding during gender-affirming hormone therapy in transgender men.

PURPOSE: While it is common for menstrual cycles to cease within the initial 6 months of treatment, there are instances where some transgender men may not experience this cessation. We analyzed transgender men undergoing gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) with testosterone who experienced breakthrough bleeding in order to identify the factors associated with this condition. METHODS: In this case-control study, 24 transgender men in the case group and 48 in the control group were assessed for clinical, sociodemographic, hormonal, and body composition variables using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. All participants had been on GATH for at least 6 months. RESULTS: A few transgender men experienced persistent breakthrough bleeding, which was associated with decreased testosterone levels and free androgen index (FAI) compared with controls (p = 0.002 and p = 0.008, respectively). Among individuals with breakthrough bleeding, 50% had testosterone levels below the lowest tertile calculated for the sample, compared with 18.8% on controls (p = 0.007). After therapy adjustment, testosterone levels increased compared with the values obtained in the initial bleeding episode (p = 0.031). Eight transgender men required the addition of an oral progestogen to achieve amenorrhea, and these individuals had higher BMI than those in whom the adjustment of the parenteral testosterone dose was adequate (p = 0.026). A univariate prevalence ratio analysis revealed a negative association of persistent bleeding with testosterone levels (p = 0.028) and FAI levels (p = 0.019). CONCLUSION: Higher BMI and lower levels of testosterone and FAI were the main factors associated with breakthrough bleeding in transgender men.

Breaking the Binary: The Approach to Chest Masculinizing Gender-Affirming Surgery in Trangender Men.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of mastectomy for the transgender patient is to produce a masculine appearance of the chest. A number of algorithms have been proposed for selecting the surgical technique. A holistic and surgical approach to transgender men includes our experience-based classification system for selecting the correct surgical technique. OBJECTIVES: To present and discuss the Transgender Standard of Care and our personal experience. METHODS: Data were collected from the files of female-to-male transgender persons who underwent surgery during 2003-2019. Pictures of the patients were also analyzed. RESULTS: Until May 2021, 342 mastectomies were performed by the senior author on 171 patients. The 220 mastectomies performed on 110 patients until November 2019 were included in our cohort. Patient age was 13.5 to 50 years (mean 22.5 ± 6.1). The excision averaged 443 grams per breast (range 85-2550). A periareolar approach was performed in 14 (12.7%), omega-shaped resection (nipple-areola complex on scar) in 2 (1.8%), spindle-shaped mastectomy with a dermal nipple-areola complex flap approach in 38 (34.5%), and a complete mastectomy with a free nipple-areola complex graft in 56 (50.9%). Complications included two hypertrophic scars, six hematomas requiring revision surgery, three wound dehiscences, and three cases of partial nipple necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: A holistic approach to transgender healthcare is presented based on the World Professional Association for Transgender Health standard of care. Analysis of the data led to Wolf's classification for female-to-male transgender mastectomy based on skin excess and the distance between the original and the planned position of the nipple-areola complex.

Testosterone Therapy With Subcutaneous Injections: A Safe, Practical, and Reasonable Option.

CONTEXT: Injections with intramuscular (IM) testosterone esters have been available for almost 8 decades and not only result in predictable serum testosterone levels but are also the most inexpensive modality. However, they are difficult to self-administer and associated with some discomfort. Recently, subcutaneous (SC) administration of testosterone esters has gained popularity, as self-administration is easier with this route. Available data, though limited, support the feasibility of this route. Here we review the pharmacokinetics and safety of SC testosterone therapy with both long- and ultralong-acting testosterone esters. In addition, we provide guidance for clinicians on how to counsel and manage their patients who opt for the SC route. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: Systematic review of available literature on SC testosterone administration including clinical trials, case series, and case reports. We also review the pharmacology of testosterone absorption after SC administration. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Available evidence, though limited, suggests that SC testosterone therapy in doses similar to those given via IM route results in comparable pharmacokinetics and mean serum testosterone levels. With appropriate training, patients should be able to safely self-administer testosterone esters SC with relative ease and less discomfort compared with the IM route. CONCLUSION: Although studies directly comparing the safety of SC vs IM administration of testosterone esters are desirable, clinicians should consider discussing the SC route with their patients because it is easier to self-administer and has the potential to improve patient adherence.

Risk of Venous Thromboembolism in Transgender People Undergoing Hormone Feminizing Therapy: A Prevalence Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression Study.

Background: Although venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a recognized side effect of some formulations of estrogen therapy, its impact in transgender people remains uncertain. The aim of this study was to define pooled prevalence estimate and correlates of VTE in Assigned Males at Birth (AMAB) trans people undergoing gender affirming hormone therapy. Methods: A thorough search of MEDLINE, COCHRANE LIBRARY, SCOPUS and WEB OF SCIENCE databases was carried out to identify suitable studies. Quality of the articles was scored using the Assessment Tool for Prevalence Studies. Data were combined using random effects models and the between-study heterogeneity was assessed by the Cochrane's Q and I2. Results: The eighteen studies included gave information about 11,542 AMAB undergoing gender affirming hormone therapy. The pooled prevalence of VTE was 2% (95%CI:1-3%), with a large heterogeneity (I2 = 89.18%, P<0.0001). Trim-and-fill adjustment for publication bias produced a negligible effect on the pooled estimate. At the meta-regression analysis, a higher prevalence of VTE was significantly associated with an older age (S=0.0063; 95%CI:0.0022,0.0104, P=0.0027) and a longer length of estrogen therapy (S=0.0011; 95%CI:0.0006,0.0016, P<0.0001). When, according to the meta-regression results, the analysis was restricted to series with a mean age ≥37.5 years, the prevalence estimate for VTE increased up to 3% (95%CI:0-5%), but with persistence of a large heterogeneity (I2 = 88,2%, P<0.0001); studies on younger participants (<37.5 years) collectively produced a pooled VTE prevalence estimate of 0% (95%CI:0-2%) with no heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, P=0.97). Prevalence estimate for VTE in series with a mean length of estrogen therapy ≥53 months was 1% (95%CI:0-3%), with persistent significant heterogeneity (I2 = 84,8%, P=0.0006); studies on participants subjected to a shorter length of estrogen therapy (<53 months), collectively produced a pooled VTE prevalence estimate of 0% (95%CI:0-3%) with no heterogeneity (I2 = 0%, P=0.76). Conclusions: The overall rate of VTE in AMAB trans people undergoing gender affirming hormone therapy was 2%. In AMAB population with <37.5 years undergoing estrogen therapy for less than 53 months, the risk of VTE appears to be negligible. Further studies are warranted to assess whether different types and administration routes of estrogen therapy could decrease the VTE risk in AMAB trans people over 37.5 years subjected to long-term therapy. Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/], identifier [CRD42021229916].

Ovarian, breast, and metabolic changes induced by androgen treatment in transgender men.

Gender-affirming hormone therapy (GAHT) is often provided to transgender people. In this review of the literature, the current knowledge of ovarian, breast, and metabolic changes (body composition, insulin resistance, bone density, cardiovascular risk factors such as lipids, blood pressure, and hematocrit) observed following GAHT in adult transgender men is discussed. A body of literature concurs to describe that long-term androgen therapy in transgender men exerts atrophic effects on the breast. There is currently no evidence of an increased risk of breast cancer. Long-term testosterone treatment induces ovarian effects that become visible after 6 months of therapy. These changes consist of both macroscopic and microscopic alterations of ovarian morphology that mimic the typical ovarian aspect encountered in women with polycystic ovary syndrome but without an effect on antral follicle count. Metabolic effects of long-term androgen treatment in transgender men put them at par with cisgender men in terms of lipid profile, insulin resistance, and overall mortality. Body composition changes as desired after testosterone administration in most transgender men, and insulin resistance decreases with virilization. There are no detrimental effects on bone mineral density. Cardiometabolic risk and morbidity data are currently reassuring, even if certain studies show conflicting results. An increase in blood pressure and a decrease in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol have been reported as risk factors, whereas polycythemia is rare and treatable. Most available data are observational and based on biochemical markers instead of the more direct measures of cardiovascular damage. An explanation for these observed changes is mostly lacking. Psychological stress and lifestyle factors are often forgotten in a much needed integrated approach.