Real-world evidence of quality of life improvement in patients with distal ulcerative colitis treated by mesalazine: the Quartz study.

BACKGROUND: Distal ulcerative colitis (UC) is responsible for distressing symptoms and reduces quality of life (QoL). Oral and topical formulations of 5-amino-salicylic acid are the first line therapy for mild to moderate distal UC. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the impact of mesalazine treatment for mild to moderate ulcerative proctitis and proctosigmoiditis on patient QoL. METHODS: Ninety-three patients with mild to moderate ulcerative proctitis and proctosigmoiditis, initiating a treatment with Pentasa, were prospectively included. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to W8 in patient health-related QoL (HRQoL) as measured by the Short Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (SIBDQ) total score. RESULTS: More than 80% of patients were prescribed with a rectal formulation, either alone (47.9%) or with an oral formulation (35.1%), and 17.0% of patients were prescribed oral formulation alone. Mean SIBDQ score was improved at W8 in patients affected with mild and moderate disease ( P < 0.001 versus baseline in both groups, as well as in patients who achieved clinical remission ( P < 0.001). Patients who achieved clinical remission at W8 reached a mean change of +6.7 (±7.1), whereas those who did not achieve clinical remission had a mean change of +1.1 (±8.9). Seventy-five per cent of patients had an improvement of their disability index at W8. Fecal incontinence was also improved at W8. CONCLUSION: HRQoL measuring with the SIBDQ is proportionally related to disease activity in patients with distal UC treated with mesalazine.

Acetarsol in the management of mesalazine-refractory ulcerative proctitis: a tertiary-level care experience.

BACKGROUND: Mesalazine-refractory ulcerative proctitis is common, with a significant proportion of the patients requiring escalation to immunomodulators or biological therapy. Three small preliminary cohort studies suggested good clinical efficacy for the organic arsenic derivative acetarsol in the management of proctitis. Our aim was to describe our experience on the use of acetarsol in proctitis and to review all existing evidence on its safety and efficacy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of all ulcerative colitis patients exposed to acetarsol at Nottingham University Hospitals since 2012. Clinical response was determined basing on physicians' global assessments and patients' improvement over the baseline (reduction in stool frequency and rectal bleeding). Clinical remission was defined as total resolution of symptoms including bleeding cessation. Serum arsenic, C-reactive protein and faecal calprotectin levels reviewed when available. Nonparametric analysis performed. RESULTS: Twenty-eight (16 males) patients with median (range) age 39 (35) and 9 (19) years disease duration received acetarsol suppositories for proctitis. All had failed mesalazine or corticosteroid topical therapy, with 50% having additionally failed immunomodulators. Median treatment duration was 70 (64) days. 16/28 were prescribed acetarsol more than once. 67.9% achieved clinical response and 46.4% clinical remission. 32.1% required treatment escalation to steroids, thiopurines or antitumour necrosis factor agents. 6/28 patients stopped acetarsol due to side effects. CONCLUSION: Acetarsol could be an effective and safe option in the management of refractory proctitis. A definitive trial with long-term safety follow-up is required to investigate the efficacy and safety of this promising drug.

Autoimmune Pancreatitis and Ulcerative Rectocolitis in an Adolescent.

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is rare in teenagers and difficult to diagnose. There are no clear and established diagnostic criteria in the pediatric population to distinguish subtype 1 and subtype 2. Here, we report the case of a 16-year-old white French teenager admitted to the pediatric emergency service with more than 1 year's history of pain originating from the epigastric and the right hypochondriac regions, with bloody diarrhea. After exclusion of pancreatic cancer and other common causes of acute pancreatitis, the diagnosis of AIP was suspected. Biological analyses revealed acute pancreatitis with severe cholestasis and an elevated level of serum immunoglobulin G4. Magnetic resonance cholangiography revealed a voluminous pancreas presenting a typical "sausage-like" aspect. Anatomopathological analyses of the liver biopsy specimen revealed a biliary obstruction due to pancreatic involvement without the typical aspect of chronic destructive cholangitis. Corticotherapy and immunosuppressive treatment proved effective after 1 week of treatment. Without a pancreatic biopsy specimen, the distinction between AIP type 1 and 2 could not be made clearly in this case. The succession of clinical observations could allow clinicians to recognize, treat, and manage AIP in children.

Efficacy of topical 5-aminosalicylate monotherapy in patients with ulcerative proctitis with skip inflammation.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In some patients with ulcerative proctitis (UP), skip inflammation is noted in the right side of the colon, but little is known about its clinical course. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical course of UP with skip inflammation and the efficacy of topical 5-aminosalicylate (5-ASA) monotherapy. METHODS: This study reviewed the data of 388 patients with an initial diagnosis of UP from January 2005 to October 2015. This study matched each UP patient with skip inflammation 1:2 with controls who had UP without skip inflammation; to reduce bias, this study matched the controls with the cases by age, gender, and initial disease activity. RESULTS: During the follow-up period (median: 69.5 months), the overall progression rates for the control group (n = 192) and the skip inflammation group (n = 96) were 24.0% and 32.9% at 10 years, respectively (log-rank P = 0.71). In the skip inflammation group, the progression rates were not significantly different between the 5-ASA combination group and the topical group, 33.4% and 26.6% at 10 years, respectively (log-rank P = 0.96). The overall acute exacerbation rates for the control and skip inflammation groups were 17.2% and 26.8% at 10 years, respectively (log-rank P = 0.68). In the skip inflammation group, the exacerbation rates were also not significantly different between the combination and topical treatment groups, 26.6% and 23.6% at 10 years, respectively (log-rank P = 0.88). CONCLUSION: The clinical course of UP with skip inflammation was not different from that of typical UP, and topical 5-ASA monotherapy for maintaining remission was as effective as 5-ASA combination therapy irrespective of the presence of skip lesions.

Baseline Oral 5-ASA Use and Efficacy and Safety of Budesonide Foam in Patients with Ulcerative Proctitis and Ulcerative Proctosigmoiditis: Analysis of 2 Phase 3 Studies.

BACKGROUND: Rectal budesonide foam is a second-generation corticosteroid efficacious for active mild to moderate ulcerative proctitis and ulcerative proctosigmoiditis. This subgroup analysis examined the impact of baseline oral 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) on the efficacy and safety of budesonide foam in patients with mild to moderate ulcerative proctitis or ulcerative proctosigmoiditis. METHODS: Patients received budesonide foam 2 mg/25 mL twice daily for 2 weeks, then once daily for 4 weeks, or placebo, with or without continued stable dosing of baseline oral 5-ASAs, for remission induction at week 6 (primary endpoint) in 2 identically designed, randomized, double-blind, phase 3 studies. RESULTS: Of the 267 and 279 patients randomized to treatment with budesonide foam or placebo (pooled population), 55.1% and 55.2%, respectively, reported baseline 5-ASA use. A significantly greater percentage of patients achieved remission with budesonide foam versus placebo, either with (42.2% versus 31.8%, respectively; P = 0.03) or without (40.0% versus 14.4%; P < 0.0001) baseline 5-ASA use at week 6. A significantly greater percentage of patients achieved a Modified Mayo Disease Activity Index rectal bleeding subscale score of 0 at week 6, regardless of baseline 5-ASA use (5-ASA, 50.3% versus 35.7%; P = 0.003: no 5-ASA, 45.8% versus 19.2%; P < 0.0001). The frequency of adverse events was comparable between groups, regardless of baseline 5-ASA use. CONCLUSIONS: Budesonide foam was efficacious and safe for induction of remission of mild to moderate ulcerative proctitis and ulcerative proctosigmoiditis in patients receiving oral 5-ASA at baseline and those who were not (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT01008410 and NCT01008423).

Oral 5-Aminosalicylate, Mesalamine Suppository, and Mesalamine Enema as Initial Therapy for Ulcerative Proctitis in Clinical Practice with Quality of Care Implications.

Background. Ulcerative proctitis (UP) is typically treated initially with oral 5-aminosalicylate ("5-ASA"), mesalamine suppository, or mesalamine enema ("UP Rx"). Little is known about their effectiveness in practice. Methods. Using a US health insurance database, we identified new-onset UP patients between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2007, based on the following: (1) initiation of UP Rx; (2) endoscopy in prior 30 days resulting in diagnosis of UP; and (3) no prior encounters for ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. We examined the incidence of therapy escalation and total costs in relation to initial UP Rx. Results. We identified 548 patients: 327 received mesalamine suppository, 138 received oral 5-ASA, and 83 received mesalamine enema, as initial UP Rx. One-third receiving oral 5-ASA experienced therapy escalation over 12 months, 21% for both mesalamine suppository and enema. Mean cumulative total cost of UP Rx over 12 months was $1552, $996, and $986 for patients beginning therapy with oral 5-ASA, mesalamine enema, and mesalamine suppository, respectively. Contrary to expert recommendations the treatments were often not continued prophylactically. Conclusions. Treatment escalation was common, and total costs of therapy were higher, in patients who initiated treatment with oral 5-ASA. Further study is necessary to assess the significance of these observations.

Eficacia y seguridad de supositorios de mesalazina en pacientes adultos con proctitis o proctosigmoiditis ulcerativa para las fases agudas y del mantenimiento de la remision / Efficacy and safety of mesalazine suppositories in adult patients with proctitis or ulcerative proctosigmoiditis for acute phases and maintenance of remission

INTRODUCCIÓN: Antecedentes: El presente dictamen presenta la evaluación de tecnología de la eficacia y seguridad de los supositorios de mesalazina para su uso en pacientes adultos con proctitis o proctosigmoiditis ulcerativa para las fases aguda y del mantenimiento de la remisión. Aspectos Generales: La colitis ulcerativa (CU) es la condición inflamatoria crónica más común de las enfermedades gastrointestinales. Frecuentemente se desarrolla entre los 15 y 25 años y 55 y 65 años, aunque no excluye la población fuera de estos rangos de edad. Esta enfermedad genera inflamación a nivel de la mucosa del colon, siendo variable la extensión de la inflamación y pudiendo llegar a afectar también el área del recto. Se caracteriza por fases de relapso y remisión. Tecnología Sanitaria de Interés: Mesalazina (Canasa®/Mesacron®/Pentasa®/Salofalk®/Asacol®) es un medicamento anti-inflamatorio de acción tópica compuesto químicamente por el ácido 5 aminosalicílico o 5-ASA. Tiene dos vías de administración, oral y rectal, siendo los supositorios rectales, la forma de presentación de interés de esta evaluación de tecnología. METODOLOGÍA: Estratégia de Búsqueda: Se realizó una estrategia de búsqueda sistemática de la evidencia científica con respecto a la eficacia y seguridad de supositorios de mesalazina para pacientes con proctitis o proctosigmoiditis ulcerativa en fases aguda y del mantenimiento de la remisión. Para la búsqueda primaria se revisó la información disponible por entes reguladoras y normativas como la Administración de Drogas y Alimentos (FDA), y la Dirección General de Medicamentos y Drogas (DIGEMID). Posteriormente, se buscaron guías de práctica clínica a través de los metabuscadores: Translating Research into Practice (TRIPDATABASE), The National Guideline of Clearinghouse (NGC), y Health Systems Evidence (HSE). Seguidamente, se realizó una búsqueda dentro de la información generada por grupos internacionales que realizan revisiones sistemáticas, evaluaciónes de tecnologías sanitarias y guías de práctica clínica, tales comoHealth Technology Assesment (HTA), la Biblioteca de Cochrane, el Instituto Nacional de la Salud y Excelencia en Cuidado (NICE), la Agencia Canadiense de Drogas y Tecnologías en Salud (CADTH), y el Consorcio Escocés de Medicinas (SMC). Adicionalmente se revisaron las bases National Library of Medicine (Pubmed-Medline), LILACS, EMBASE, OVID, y complementando la búsqueda con la página de ensayos clínicos www.clinicaltrials.gov, para identificar estudios primarios en elaboración o que no hayan sido publicados aún. RESULTADOS: Tras la búsqueda se encontró evidencia que sustenta la eficacia y seguridad de supositorios de mesalazina en pacientes adultos con proctitis o proctosigmoiditis ulcerativa para las fases aguda y del mantenimiento de la remisión.RESULTADOS: Tras la búsqueda se encontró evidencia que sustenta la eficacia y seguridad de supositorios de mesalazina en pacientes adultos con proctitis o proctosigmoiditis ulcerativa para las fases aguda y del mantenimiento de la remisión. Sinopsis de la Evidencia: Se encontró evidencia acerca de la eficacia y seguridad de supositorios de mesalazina en pacientes adultos con proctitis o proctosigmoiditis ulcerativa para las fases aguda y del mantenimiento de la remisión. CONCLUSIONES: La presente evaluación de tecnología evalúa la evidencia disponible a Febrero del 2016 para el uso de supositorios de mesalazina para pacientes adultos con proctitis o proctosigmoiditis para las fases agudas y del mantenimiento de la remisión. - Se ha encontrado evidencia que sustenta la eficacia y seguridad de supositorios de mesalazina, la cual está basada en dos guías de práctica clínica y dos revisiones sistemáticas de buena calidad metodológica. Cabe resaltar que esta eficacia ha sido demostrada únicamente para la población de pacientes con proctitis o proctosigmoiditis ulcerativa, mas no en otras áreas del colon en fases aguda. Sin embargo, para la fase del mantenimiento de la remisión no se ha encontrado evidencia directa que evalúe el potencial beneficio de supositorios de mesalazina. , El Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación ­ IETSI, aprueba el uso de supositorios de mesalazina en pacientes adultos con proctitis o proctosigmoiditis ulcerativa para el tratamiento de fases aguda y del mantenimiento de la remisión. El presente Dictamen Preliminar tiene una vigencia de dos años a partir de la fecha de publicación.

[Peripheral neuropathy during Infliximab therapy: a case study]. / Neuropathie périphérique sous Infliximab: étude d'une observation.

Anti TNF alpha treatments are wide spectrum therapies. Multiple side effects have been reported in recent years, particularly peripheral neuropathies. We report a case of axonal neuropathy occurring three months after starting treatment with Infliximab. Our study focused on a 60-year old female patient treated for therapy-resistant hemorrhagic rectocolitis, requiring treatment with infliximab. Three months later, the patient had sensory axonal neuropathy. Etiologic assessment remained negative and dose reduction was accompanied by an improvement in symptoms. The time between initiation of treatment with Infliximab and the onset of clinical manifestations as well as improvement after dose reduction advocate the responsibility of infliximab in the occurrence of sensory neuropathy. Its management is not standardized and should be discussed case by case.

Budesonide Foam Has a Favorable Safety Profile for Inducing Remission in Mild-to-Moderate Ulcerative Proctitis or Proctosigmoiditis.

BACKGROUND: Budesonide foam, a rectally administered, second-generation corticosteroid with extensive hepatic first-pass metabolism, is efficacious for the treatment of mild-to-moderate ulcerative proctitis and ulcerative proctosigmoiditis. AIM: The aim of this study was to comprehensively assess the safety and pharmacokinetic profile of budesonide foam. METHODS: Data from five phase III studies were pooled to further evaluate safety, including an open-label study (once-daily treatment for 8 weeks), an active-comparator study (once-daily treatment for 4 weeks), and two placebo-controlled studies and an open-label extension study (twice-daily treatment for 2 weeks, then once daily for 4 weeks). Data from the placebo-controlled studies and two phase I studies (i.e., patients with mild-to-moderate ulcerative colitis and healthy volunteers) were pooled to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of budesonide foam. RESULTS: A similar percentage of patients reported adverse events in the budesonide foam and placebo groups, with the majority of adverse events being mild or moderate in intensity (93.3 vs 96.0%, respectively). Adverse events occurred in 41.4 and 36.3% of patients receiving budesonide foam and placebo, respectively. Mean morning cortisol concentrations remained within the normal range for up to 8 weeks of treatment; there were no clinically relevant effects of budesonide foam on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Population pharmacokinetic analysis demonstrated low systemic exposure after budesonide foam administration. CONCLUSIONS: This integrated analysis demonstrated that budesonide foam for the induction of remission of distal ulcerative colitis is safe overall, with no clinically relevant effects on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.

Diversion proctocolitis and response to treatment with short-chain fatty acids--a clinicopathological study in children.

OBJECTIVE: Diversion proctocolitis (DPC) frequently develops in the colorectum after diversion of the fecal stream characterized by bleeding from the inflamed mucosa. Short-chain fatty acids (SCFA) are responsible for growth and differentiation of enterocytes. Adult series have reported variable response of DPC to luminal SCFA. There is dearth of studies in children. We aimed to study incidence, clinical, endoscopic, and histopathological characteristics of DPC and effect of SCFA in children. METHODS: Prospectively clinical, endoscopic, and histopathological evaluation was done for DPC in children undergoing fecal diversion. Patient characteristics, type and duration of stoma, symptoms, endoscopy and biopsy findings, duration of treatment and response to SCFA, time of closure of stoma, and any associated gut anomaly were recorded. RESULTS: Fifteen children completed the study. Anorectal malformation was the commonest indication for stoma. Sixty percent were symptomatic within 2-9 months, excessive mucous discharge being the commonest symptom. All had at least one positive endoscopic finding; erythema, edema, and exudates being the commonest findings. All DPCs improved clinically and endoscopically following SCFA. Histological resolution was seen in 78 %, while 22 % had persistent disease. Closure of stoma showed complete resolution of DPC. CONCLUSION: DPC was common (87 %) following stoma formation in children with strong male preponderance (6.5:1). The commonest indication for stoma was anorectal malformation (67 %). Clinical, endoscopic, and histopathological changes appeared within 2-9 months with symptomatic DPC in 60 %. All patients (100 %) had at least one positive endoscopic finding, histopathological examination confirmed the diagnosis. SCFA led to symptomatic, endoscopic, and histopathological resolution of DPCs. Closure of stoma cured all the persistent DPCs.