Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Contact Dermatitis ; 21(3): 166-71, 1989 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-2791540

RESUMO

A predictive study comparing the sensitizing potentials of some topical antimicrobials, using a modified Beuhler's technique, showed that over-the-counter (OTC) antimicrobials were more sensitizing than prescribed topical antibiotics. Among OTC antimicrobials, proflavine was the most potent sensitizer (4/10 guinea pigs); parachlorometaxylenol, benzalkonium chloride and propamidine isethionate moderate sensitizers (2/10 guinea pigs); iodine a weak sensitizer (1/10 guinea pigs); and chlorhexidine and cetrimide very weak sensitizers (0/10 guinea pigs). Among prescribed topical antibiotics, neomycin was a moderate sensitizer (2/10 guinea pigs); gentamycin and chloramphenicol weak sensitizers (1/10 guinea pigs); kanamycin, clioquinol, polymyxin B, bacitracin, tetracycline, sodium fusidate and fusidic acid very weak sensitizers (0/10 guinea pigs). There was good correlation between sensitizing potentials in animal studies and clinical experience of contact allergy to these topical antimicrobials.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/imunologia , Anti-Infecciosos Locais/imunologia , Dermatite de Contato/etiologia , Hipersensibilidade a Drogas/etiologia , Administração Tópica , Animais , Antiprotozoários/imunologia , Clorexidina/imunologia , Cobaias , Proflavina/imunologia , Xilenos/imunologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA