Antifungal activity of propafenone on Candida spp. strains: interaction with antifungals and possible mechanism of action.

Introduction. The development of new antifungal drugs has become a global priority, given the increasing cases of fungal diseases together with the rising resistance to available antifungal drugs. In this scenario, drug repositioning has emerged as an alternative for such development, with advantages such as reduced research time and costs.Gap statement. Propafenone is an antiarrhythmic drug whose antifungal activity is poorly described, being a good candidate for further study.Aim. This study aims to evaluate propafenone activity against different species of Candida spp. to evaluate its combination with standard antifungals, as well as its possible action mechanism.Methodology. To this end, we carried out tests against strains of Candida albicans, Candida auris, Candida parapsilosis, Candida tropicalis, Candida glabrata and Candida krusei based on the evaluation of the MIC, minimum fungicidal concentration and tolerance level, along with checkerboard and flow cytometry tests with clinical strains and cell structure analysis by scanning electron microscopy (SEM).Results. The results showed that propafenone has a 50% MIC ranging from 32 to 256 µg ml-1, with fungicidal activity and positive interactions with itraconazole in 83.3% of the strains evaluated. The effects of the treatments observed by SEM were extensive damage to the cell structure, while flow cytometry revealed the apoptotic potential of propafenone against Candida spp.Conclusion. Taken together, these results indicate that propafenone has the potential for repositioning as an antifungal drug.

A Tissue Distribution Study of Propafenone in an Intentional Fatal Poisoning Case.

Propafenone (PPF) belongs to the class 1C antiarrhythmics and can cause electrocardiogram-associated adverse/toxic effects. Cases of PPF intoxication are rarely investigated. We developed a novel and selective GC-MS/MS method for the determination of PPF and its tissue distribution in an intentional fatal poisoning case, which is applicable to PPF quantification in the range of therapeutic to lethal concentrations in complex post-mortem samples. A simple and effective sample pretreatment was applied to all analyzed samples. PPF was determined without the need for dilution, even in highly complex samples containing a wide range of analyte concentrations. Quantification was performed using the standard addition method, developed and validated according to the ICH M10 guidelines. The obtained results indicated that the PPF concentration in the serum from blood taken while alive, before therapy, was the highest ever reported in the literature. Despite the intensive therapy after the patients' admission, the PPF concentrations in the lungs, spleen, femoral blood and cardiac blood were fatal or abnormally high. On the other hand, the concentrations in the liver and skeletal muscle were lower or approximately the same as observed in cases with therapeutic doses. To the best of our knowledge, the distribution of PPF has not been investigated in fatal intoxication cases and can be helpful in clinical or forensic toxicology.

(N-NITROSO) PROPAFENONE INDUCED ADVANCED NODULAR MELANOMA-FIRST REPORTED CASE IN THE WORLD LITERATURE: THE INEXTRICABLE LINKS BETWEEN THE PHOTOCARCINOGENESIS, DRUG RELATED NITROSOGENESIS AND PHARMACO-ONCOGENESIS.

Onco-pharmacogenesis or pharmaco-oncogenesis of skin cancer is a concept , which could also be considered as an "end product" of drug-mediated Nitrosogenesis or of the permissive regime for carcinogens to be (un)controlled released in drugs. Their controlled distribution remains until 2025 as a forced and non-alternative and there is no indication of any possibility to introduce a full elimination regime against the already mentioned carcinogenic availability. There are three main worrying facts that determine the need for these elimination regimes: 1) the clinicopathological correlations concerning the intake of a heterogeneous class of drugs and the subsequent development of relatively homogeneous tumours/ such as melanoma, 2) the recently proven mutagenic/ carcinogenic action of certain nitrosamines, but this time directly on human DNA, and 3) the fact that some of the nitrosamines are potent photocarcinogens that exert their genotoxic effects only after irradiation with UVA/ also recently proven/. In addition to the rhetoric mentioned above, there is also an overlap in mutational patterns between the genes previously generally accepted to affect melanomas - p53 / RAS oncogenes , with those identified as target genes, but being affected "mutationally", by certain nitrosamines. The processes of photocarcinogenesis, nitrosogenesis and oncopharmacogenesis of skin cancer are inextricably linked and should not be considered and analysed unilaterally or in a semi-invasive manner. Cataloguing the type of nitrosamines and their precise concentration on drug leaflets and prescription/official websites with permanent access to clinicians and end-users remains the only safe and effective weapon in the fight against (un)controlled contamination. The pharmaceutical industry and regulators remain the creators, the 'parents' of onco-pharmacogenesis, nitrosogenesis, and therefore the processes involved in the generation and progression of skin cancer. The impossibility of establishing elimination regimes for certain mutagens and/or carcinogens already proven to be present in medicines remains a mystery. In practice, end consumers find themselves in a state of enforced tolerance of certain genotoxic substances that are not even declared as available. Clinicians in the face of dermatologists/ dermatological surgeons remain the analysers and identifiers of these globalization processes. Once again, we present a patient who took the antiarrhythmic (nitroso-) drug propafenone and developed a relatively short-term nodular melanoma with a subsequent fatal outcome. We comment on the role of drug-mediated nitrosogenesis and its relationship to photocarcinogenesis and onco-pharmacogenesis.

A case of lethal suicidal intoxication with propafenone and diazepam.

Diazepam poisoning is a common emergency situation, but propafenone poisoning is relatively rare. We reported a case of propafenone poisoning combined with diazepam. An 18-year-old female patient was admitted to our hospital with an overdose of oral propafenone and diazepam. The patient was treated with medication that proved to be useful, but the sinus rhythm could not be recovered, and cardiac arrest occurred. A bipolar temporary pacemaker and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) were installed. However, even with multiple electrode positions, effective capture could not be achieved. The patient eventually died. We should be alert to the possibility of co-poisoning.

Class 1C Antiarrhythmics for Premature Ventricular Complex Suppression in Nonischemic Cardiomyopathy With Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators.

BACKGROUND: Premature ventricular complexes (PVCs) are common and associated with worse outcomes in patients with heart failure. Class 1C antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) effectively suppress PVCs, but guidelines currently restrict their use in structural heart disease. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of class 1C AADs in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). METHODS: All patients with NICM and an ICD treated with flecainide or propafenone at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania between 2014 and 2022 were identified. PVC burden, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and biventricular pacing percentage were compared before and during class 1C AAD treatment. Safety outcomes included sustained atrial and ventricular arrhythmias, heart failure admissions, and death. RESULTS: We identified 34 patients, 23 receiving flecainide and 11 propafenone. Most patients (62%) had failed other AADs or catheter ablation (68%) prior to class 1C AAD initiation. PVC burden decreased from 20% ± 13% to 6% ± 7% (P < 0.001), LVEF increased from 33% ± 9% to 37% ± 10% (P = 0.01), and biventricular pacing percentage increased from 85% ± 9% to 93% ± 7% (P = 0.01). Sustained ventricular tachycardia (2 vs 9 patients) and admissions for decompensated heart failure (2 vs 3 patients) decreased compared with the 12 months prior to class 1C AAD initiation. CONCLUSIONS: Class 1C AADs effectively suppressed PVCs in patients with NICM and ICDs, leading to increases in LVEF and biventricular pacing percentage. In this limited sample, their use was safe. Larger studies are needed to confirm the safety of this approach.

The outcomes of patients with septic shock treated with propafenone compared to amiodarone for supraventricular arrhythmias are related to end-systolic left atrial volume.

AIMS: A recently published trial has shown no differences in outcomes between patients with new-onset supraventricular arrhythmia (SVA) in septic shock treated with either propafenone or amiodarone. However, these outcome data have not been evaluated in relation to the presence or absence of a dilated left atrium (LA). METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with SVA and a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 35% were randomized to receive intravenous propafenone (70 mg bolus followed by 400-840 mg/24 h) or amiodarone (300 mg bolus followed by 600-1800 mg/24 h). They were divided into groups based on whether their end-systolic left atrial volume (LAVI) was ≥40 mL/m². The subgroup outcomes assessed were survival at ICU discharge, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. Propafenone cardioverted earlier (P = 0.009) and with fewer recurrences (P = 0.001) in the patients without LA enlargement (n = 133). Patients with LAVI < 40 mL/m2 demonstrated a mortality benefit of propafenone over the follow-up of 1 year [Cox regression, hazard ratio (HR) 0.6 (95% CI 0.4; 0.9), P = 0.014]. Patients with dilated LA (n = 37) achieved rhythm control earlier in amiodarone (P = 0.05) with similar rates of recurrences (P = 0.5) compared to propafenone. The outcomes for patients with LAVI ≥ 40 mL/m2 were less favourable with propafenone compared to amiodarone at 1 month [HR 3.6 (95% CI 1.03; 12.5), P = 0.045]; however, it did not reach statistical significance at 1 year [HR 1.9 (95% CI 0.8; 4.4), P = 0.138]. CONCLUSION: Patients with non-dilated LA who achieved rhythm control with propafenone in the setting of septic shock had better short-term and long-term outcomes than those treated with amiodarone, which seemed to be more effective in patients with LAVI ≥ 40 mL/m². TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03029169, registered on 24 January 2017.

Efficacy and safety of antazoline vs propafenone for conversion of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm: a randomized, double-blind study (AnProAF).

INTRODUCTION: Antazoline is a frequently used antiarrhythmic drug (AAD); however, to date, no randomized controlled trial has evaluated its efficacy and safety for cardioversion of recent­onset atrial fibrillation (AF) in comparison with other approved AADs. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare clinical efficacy and safety of antazoline and propafenone for a rapid conversion of nonvalvular paroxysmal AF to sinus rhythm in patients without heart failure. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single­center, randomized, double­blind study. It included patients with AF (lasting <48 hours) who were in a stable cardiopulmonary condition and eligible for cardioversion. The individuals who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to receive either antazoline (up to 300 mg) or propafenone (up to 140 mg) intravenously. The primary end point was conversion of AF to sinus rhythm confirmed on electrocardiography. RESULTS: Overall, 94 participants (46 [48.9%] in the antazoline group and 48 [51.1%] in the propafenone group) were included. The mean (SD) age was 67.5 (14) years, and 40 participants (42.5%) were men. Successful AF conversion was observed in 29 patients (63%) from the antazoline group and 25 individuals (52.1%) from the propafenone group (P = 0.39). The median time to conversion was 10 minutes in the antazoline group and 30 minutes in the propafenone group (P = 0.03). Severe adverse events were observed in 5 patients (10.8%) treated with antazoline and 5 individuals (10.4%) who received propafenone. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous antazoline demonstrated efficacy and safety comparable to those of intravenous propafenone for acute conversion of nonvalvular paroxysmal AF to sinus rhythm in patients without heart failure.

NITROSAMINE CONTAMINATION WITHIN CARDIAC MULTIMEDICATION - SARTANS (VALSARTAN), CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKERS (AMLODIPINE AND NIFEDIPINE), AND ANTIARRHYTHMICS (PROPAFENONE) AS A SIGNIFICANT FACTOR IN THE DEVELOPMENT AND PROGRESSION OF MULTIPLE KERATINOCYTIC CANCERS: ADVANCEMENT ROTATION FLAP FOR KERATOACANTHOMA OF THE UPPER LIP AND UNDERMINING SURGERY FOR BCC OF THE SHOULDER AS AN OPTIMAL DERMATOSURGICAL APPROACH.

The data on the polycontamination of multimedication in polymorbid patients with a heterogeneous class of carcinogens/nitrosamines, NDSRIs (classified according to the FDA regulation to the companies of 2023 to those with a carcinogenic potency between 1 and 5), are one of the most important steps to clarify the concept of skin cancer nitrosogenesis/ pathogenesis. The FDA is the first regulatory institution in the world to courageously declare that a problem exists and should be addressed. The main and currently unexplained and somewhat controversial issue lies in 1) the sporadic nature of polycontamination in different geographical regions, and 2) the lack of official data from the established international, but also regional pharmaceutical market regulators on the results of the checks conducted for nitrosamine contamination of the respective batches. It is this that leads scientists to the idea of (albeit seemingly) speculative but entirely possible controlled contamination of the production in certain geographical regions. This (hypo)thesis is supported, albeit indirectly, by the fact that: a recent regional check for possible contamination of sartans in a particular geographical region was not indicative of the presence of any nitrosamines/NDSRIs. But this fact is indicative of several extremely important things: 1) contamination is not ubiquitous, its genesis is heterogeneous; 2) contamination could be completely avoided at production level in certain geographical regions; 3) ˝controlled contamination˝ or carelessness of a heterogeneous nature should be excluded by the relevant regulators. Regular inspection and certification of medicinal products in relevant geographical regions to exclude contamination with nitrosamines/NDSRIs would be the surest method to protect public health globally. The initial parameters of the restrictive processes for the availability of nitrosamines in medicines have been established by the most powerful regulator globally in the face of the FDA, with the hope being that manufacturers will find a short-term solution to the problem. We report another patient who simultaneously developed 2 cutaneous tumors under potentially/actually nitrosamine contaminated drugs such as: beta blockers- atenolol, calcium antagonists- nifedipine/amlodipine, sartans- valsartan and antiarrhythmics- propafenone. One of the tumors was localized in the upper lip area (keratoacanthoma) and the other in the right shoulder area (basal cell carcinoma). Successful surgical treatment of the tumors was performed in the form of upper lip advancement rotation flap and elliptical excision of the second lesion. The evolution/growth rate of the tumors in relation to the potential mutagens/carcinogens heterogeneous in their potency contained in the drugs is commented.

Antiarrhythmic drugs for pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and sex differences: Insights from the CANT II Study.

BACKGROUND: Data on sex differences in terms of action of antiarrhythmic agents (AADs) are limited. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical profile of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), and efficacy and safety of AADs used for pharmacological cardioversion (PCV) of AF. METHODS: This research was a sub-analysis of the retrospective multicenter Cardioversion with ANTazoline II (CANT) registry, which comprised 1365 patients with short-duration AF referred for urgent PCV with the use of AAD. Patients were categorized according to and compared in terms of clinical parameters and PCV outcomes. The primary endpoint was return of sinus rhythm within 12 hours after drug infusion, and the composite safety endpoint involved bradycardia <45 bpm, hypotension, syncope, or death. RESULTS: The sex distribution of patients qualified for PCV was even (men, n = 725; 53.1%). Females were older and more symptomatic and had higher CHA2DS2-VASc scores, higher prevalence of tachyarrhythmia, and higher use of chronic anticoagulation. The overall efficacy (71.4% vs. 70.1%; P = 0.59) and safety (5.2% vs. 4.6%; P = 0.60) of PCV was comparable in men and women. Amiodarone (68.3% vs. 65.9%; P = 0.66) and antazoline (77.1% vs. 80.0%; P = 0.19) had similar efficacy in men and women, but propafenone had a lower rate of rhythm conversion in men (64.7% vs. 79.3%; P = 0.046). None of the assessed AADs differed in terms of safety profile in both sexes. CONCLUSION: Female patients with AF have different clinical profiles but similar efficacy and safety of AADs as compared to male participants. Propafenone has significantly lower efficacy in men, which requires further investigation.

Medical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation and flutter with class IC antiarrhythmic drugs in young patients with and without congenital heart disease.

INTRODUCTION: The use of flecainide and propafenone for medical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial flutter/intra-atrial reentrant tachycardia (IART) is well-described in adults without congenital heart disease (CHD). Data are sparse regarding their use for the same purpose in adults with CHD and in adolescent patients with anatomically normal hearts and we sought to describe the use of class IC drugs in this population and identify factors associated with decreased likelihood of success. METHODS: Single center retrospective cohort study of patients who received oral flecainide or propafenone for medical cardioversion of AF or IART from 2000 to 2022. The unit of analysis was each episode of AF/IART. We performed a time-to-sinus rhythm analysis using a Cox proportional hazards model clustering on the patient to identify factors associated with increased likelihood of success. RESULTS: We identified 45 episodes involving 41 patients. As only episodes of AF were successfully cardioverted with medical therapy, episodes of IART were excluded from our analyses. Use of flecainide was the only factor associated with increased likelihood of success. There was a statistically insignificant trend toward decreased likelihood of success in patients with CHD. CONCLUSIONS: Flecainide was more effective than propafenone. We did not detect a difference in rate of conversion to sinus rhythm between patients with and without CHD and were likely underpowered to do so, however, there was a trend toward decreased likelihood of success in patients with CHD. That said, medical therapy was effective in >50% of patients with CHD with AF.

Propafenone versus amiodarone for supraventricular arrhythmias in septic shock: a randomised controlled trial.

PURPOSE: Acute onset supraventricular arrhythmias can contribute to haemodynamic compromise in septic shock. Both amiodarone and propafenone are available interventions, but their clinical effects have not yet been directly compared. METHODS: In this two-centre, prospective controlled parallel group double blind trial we recruited 209 septic shock patients with new-onset arrhythmia and a left ventricular ejection fraction above 35%. The patients were randomised in a 1:1 ratio to receive either intravenous propafenone (70 mg bolus followed by 400-840 mg/24 h) or amiodarone (300 mg bolus followed by 600-1800 mg/24 h). The primary outcomes were the proportion of patients who had sinus rhythm 24 h after the start of the infusion, time to restoration of the first sinus rhythm and the proportion of patients with arrhythmia recurrence. RESULTS: Out of 209 randomized patients, 200 (96%) received the study drug. After 24 h, 77 (72.8%) and 71 (67.3%) were in sinus rhythm (p = 0.4), restored after a median of 3.7 h (95% CI 2.3-6.8) and 7.3 h (95% CI 5-11), p = 0.02, with propafenone and amiodarone, respectively. The arrhythmia recurred in 54 (52%) patients treated with propafenone and in 80 (76%) with amiodarone, p < 0.001. Patients with a dilated left atrium had better rhythm control with amiodarone (6.4 h (95% CI 3.5; 14.1) until cardioversion vs 18 h (95% CI 2.8; 24.7) in propafenone, p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Propafenone does not provide better rhythm control at 24 h yet offers faster cardioversion with fewer arrhythmia recurrences than with amiodarone, especially in patients with a non-dilated left atrium. No differences between propafenone and amiodarone on the prespecified short- and long-term outcomes were observed.

Pharmacological cardioversion of atrial fibrillation: practical considerations.

The choice between rhythm and rate control strategy represents one of the most intriguing dilemmas in the management of atrial fibrillation (AF). Although the advantage of rhythm over rate control in terms of outcome has not been unequivocally proven, the initial management of patients with symptomatic episodes of AF frequently involves early cardioversion. As electrical cardioversion (EC) is challenging in terms of fasting status and involvement of an anesthesiologic team, pharmacological cardioversion (PC) is usually selected as the first step toward rhythm conversion. Qualification criteria for PC or EC are similar and should comprise assessment of hemodynamic status, estimation of arrhythmic episode duration, evaluation of anticoagulation regimen, exclusion of other supraventricular arrhythmias, and assessment of the chance of rhythm conversion and persistence of sinus rhythm. Finally, the choice of adequate antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) depends on the presence of structural heart disease (SHD) and local experience. In patients without any SHD, complications occur rarely, hence traditional (propafenone, flecainide) or nonclassical Vaughan-Williams class I (antazoline) or class III (vernakalant, ibutilide, or dofetilide) drugs are preferred. The presence of SHD consistent with any left ventricular hypertrophy, heart failure, myocardial ischemia, or valvular heart disease limits the choice of AAD to amiodarone. Given the risk of ventricular proarrhythmia of AAD, safety should always prevail over the enticing possibility of rhythm conversion. The present review aims to provide a comprehensible summary of proper qualification for PC, selection of suitable AAD, and state­of­the­art periprocedural management of patients with recent­onset AF.

Idiopathic premature ventricular complexes treatment: Comparison of flecainide, propafenone, and sotalol.

BACKGROUND: Beta-blockers (BB) or dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are still the first choices in the treatment of idiopathic premature ventricular complexes (PVCs), with low-modest efficacy. Antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) of Ic class are moderate to highly efficient but the evidence on their benefits is still limited. AIM: To compare effectiveness and safety of flecainide, propafenone, and sotalol in the treatment of symptomatic idiopathic PVCs. METHODS: Our single-center retrospective study analyzed 104 consecutive patients with 130 medication episodes of frequent idiopathic PVCs treated with AADs flecainide, propafenone (Ic class) or sotalol (III class). The primary outcome was complete/near complete reduction of PVCs after medication episode (PVCs burden reduction >99%), and the secondary outcome was significant PVC burden reduction (≥80%). RESULTS: The complete/near complete PVCs burden reduction occurred in 31% and was significant in 43% of treated patients. A reduction of PVC burden for >99% was achieved in 56% of patients on flecainide, in 11% of patients on propafenone (p = .002), and in 21% of patients receiving sotalol (p = .031). There was no difference between propafenone and sotalol (p = .174). A reduction of PVC burden for ≥80% was achieved in 64% of patients on flecainide, in 30% of patients on propafenone (p = .009), and 33% of patients on sotalol (p = .020). There was no difference between propafenone and sotalol (p = .661). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of AADs class Ic and III in the treatment of idiopathic PVCs was modest. Flecainide was the most effective AAD in the achievement of complete/near complete or significant PVC burden reduction, compared to propafenone and sotalol.

Early initiation of anti-relapse antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and flutter after pharmacological cardioversion with refralon.

Aim      Evaluating the efficacy and safety of early administration of antirecurrence antiarrhythmic therapy (AAT) following restoration of sinus rhythm (SR) with refralon.Aim      Evaluating the efficacy and safety of early administration of antirecurrence antiarrhythmic therapy (AAT) following restoration of sinus rhythm (SR) with refralon.Material and methods  The study included 247 patients with atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL) (142 men) who underwent pharmacological cardioversion (PCV) with refralon. A 4-step schedule of drug administration was used (successive intravenous infusions at doses of 5, 5, 10, and 10 µg/kg; maximum total dose was 30 µg/kg). Patients who recovered SR and had no contraindications were prescribed antirecurrence AAT in the early (≤24 h; n=101) or delayed (≥24 h; n=95) period. Lappaconitine hydrobromide, propafenone, and sotalol were administered orally as the antirecurrence therapy. The decision on the time of initiating ATT and the choice of the drug and its dose was taken by the attending physician individually. The safety criteria included a prolonged PQ interval >200 ms; second- or third-degree atrioventricular block; QRS complex duration >120 ms; QT prolongation >500 ms; and heartbeat pauses >3 s. The efficacy criteria included the absence of sustained recurrence of AF/AFL after initiation of AAT and the duration of hospitalization after PCV. Patients were followed up during the study until they were discharged from the hospital.Results SR was recovered in 229 (92.7 %) patients. In the group of early AAT initiation, a PQ duration >200 ms was observed in 8 (7.9 %) patients, whereas in the group of delayed AAT initiation, in 7 patients (7.4 %; p=1.000). A wide QRS complex >120 ms was recorded in 1 (1.1 %) patient of the delayed AAT initiation group and in none of the patients of the early AAT initiation group (p=0.485). Ventricular arrhythmogenic effects and QT prolongation >500 ms were not detected in any patient. Numbers of early AF recurrence did not differ in the groups of early and delayed AAT initiation: 6 (5.9 %) vs. 5 (5.3 %), respectively (p=1.000). Median duration of hospitalization after PCV was 4 days in the group of early AAT initiation and 5 days in the group of delayed AAT initiation (р=0.009).Conclusion      Early initiation of the refralon AAT does not increase the risk of drug adverse effects and reduces the duration of stay in the hospital.

Clinical and economic outcomes associated with use of anti-arrhythmic drugs versus ablation in atrial fibrillation.

Aim: To evaluate the clinical and economic impact of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) compared with ablation both as individual treatments and as combination therapy without/with considering the order of treatment among patients with atrial fibrillation (AFib). Materials & methods: A budget impact model over a one-year time horizon was developed to assess the economic impact of AADs (amiodarone, dofetilide, dronedarone, flecainide, propafenone, sotalol, and as a group) versus ablation across three scenarios: direct comparisons of individual treatments, non-temporal combinations, and temporal combinations. The economic analysis was conducted in accordance with CHEERS guidance as per current model objectives. Results are reported as costs per patient per year (PPPY). The impact of individual parameters was evaluated using one-way sensitivity analysis (OWSA). Results: In direct comparisons, ablation had the highest annual medication/procedure cost ($29,432), followed by dofetilide ($7661), dronedarone ($6451), sotalol ($4552), propafenone ($3044), flecainide ($2563), and amiodarone ($2538). Flecainide had the highest costs for long-term clinical outcomes ($22,964), followed by dofetilide ($17,462), sotalol ($15,030), amiodarone ($12,450), dronedarone ($10,424), propafenone ($7678) and ablation ($9948). In the non-temporal scenario, total costs incurred for AADs (group) + ablation ($17,278) were lower compared with ablation alone ($39,380). In the temporal scenario, AADs (group) before ablation resulted in PPPY cost savings of ($22,858) compared with AADs (group) after ablation ($19,958). Key factors in OWSA were ablation costs, the proportion of patients having reablation, and withdrawal due to adverse events. Conclusion: Utilization of AADs as individual treatment or in combination with ablation demonstrated comparable clinical benefits along with costs savings in patients with AFib.

Drug repurposing of propafenone to discover novel anti-tumor agents by impairing homologous recombination to delay DNA damage recovery of rare disease conjunctival melanoma.

Conjunctival melanoma (CM), a rare and fatal malignant ocular tumor, lacks proper diagnostic biomarkers and therapy. Herein, we revealed the novel application of propafenone, an FDA-approved antiarrhythmic medication, which was identified effective in inhibiting CM cells viability and homologous recombination pathway. Detailed structure-activity relationships generated D34 as one of the most promising derivatives, which strongly suppressed the proliferation, viability, and migration of CM cells at submicromolar concentrations. Mechanically, D34 had the potential to increase γ-H2AX nuclear foci and aggravated DNA damage by suppressing homologous recombination pathway and its factors, particularly the complex of MRE11-RAD50-NBS1. D34 bound to human recombinant MRE11 protein and inhibited its endonuclease activity. Moreover, D34 dihydrochloride significantly suppressed tumor growth in the CRMM1 NCG xenograft model without obvious toxicity. Our finding shows that propafenone derivatives modulating the MRE11-RAD50-NBS1 complex will most likely provide an approach for CM targeted therapy, especially for improving chemo- and radio-sensitivity for CM patients.

Cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation concomitantly treated with antiarrhythmic drugs and non-vitamin k antagonist oral anticoagulants.

AIMS: Limited data compared antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs) with concomitant non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation patients, hence the aim of the study. METHODS AND RESULTS: National health insurance database were retrieved during 2012-17 for study. We excluded patients not taking AADs, bradycardia, heart block, heart failure admission, mitral stenosis, prosthetic valve, incomplete demographic data, and follow-up <3 months. Outcomes were compared in Protocol 1, dronedarone vs. non-dronedarone; Protocol 2, dronedarone vs. amiodarone; and Protocol 3, dronedarone vs. propafenone. Outcomes were acute myocardial infarction (AMI), ischaemic stroke/systemic embolism, intracranial haemorrhage (ICH), major bleeding, cardiovascular death, all-cause mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) (including AMI, ischaemic stroke, and cardiovascular death). In Protocol 1, 2298 dronedarone users and 6984 non-dronedarone users (amiodarone = 4844; propafenone = 1914; flecainide = 75; sotalol = 61) were analysed. Dronedarone was associated with lower ICH (HR = 0.61, 95% CI = 0.38-0.99, P = 0.0436), cardiovascular death (HR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.16-0.37, P < 0.0001), all-cause mortality (HR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.27-0.42, P < 0.0001), and MACE (HR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.45-0.70, P < 0.0001). In Protocol 2, 2231 dronedarone users and 6693 amiodarone users were analysed. Dronedarone was associated with significantly lower ICH (HR = 0.53, 95%=CI 0.33-0.84, P = 0.0078), cardiovascular death (HR = 0.20, 95% CI = 0.13-0.31, P < 0.0001), all-cause mortality (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.22-0.34, P < 0.0001), and MACE (HR = 0.53, 95% CI = 0.43-0.66, P < 0.0001), compared with amiodarone. In Protocol 3, 812 dronedarone users and 2436 propafenone users were analysed. There were no differences between two drugs for primary and secondary outcomes. CONCLUSION: The use of dronedarone with NOACs was associated with cardiovascular benefits in an Asian population, compared with non-dronedarone AADs and amiodarone.

Flecainide in clinical practice.

Flecainide, similar to encainide and propafenone, is IC class antiarrhythmic, inhibiting Nav1.5 sodium channels in heart muscle cells and modulates cardiac conduction. Despite its over 40-year presence in clinical practice, strong evidence and well-known safety profile, flecainide distribution in Europe has not always been equal. In Poland, the drug has been available in pharmacies only since October this year, and previously it had to be imported on request. Flecainide can be used successfully in both the acute and chronic treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. The main indication for flecainide is the treatment of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardias, including atrial fibrillation, atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia, atrioventricular re-entrant tachycardia and ventricular arrhythmias in patients without structural heart disease. Beyond that, it may be used in some supraventricular tachycardia in children and for sustained fetal tachycardia. Many studies indicate its efficacy comparable to or better than previously used drugs such as propafenone and amiodarone, depending on the indication. This review aims to highlight the most important clinical uses of flecainide in the light of the latest scientific evidence and to provide an overview of the practical aspects of treatment, including indications, off-label use, contraindications, areas of use, monitoring of treatment and most common complications, taking into account special populations: children and pregnant women.

An open-label randomized noninferior study of generic name and brand name of propafenone for rhythm control in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Propafenone is a class IC antiarrhythmic agent that is commonly used as the first-line therapy for patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) in Taiwan. This study compared the efficacy and safety of generic (Rhynorm) and brand name (Rytmonorm) propafenone for rhythm control of paroxysmal AF in Taiwan. METHODS: This was an open-label randomized multicenter noninferior study conducted in Taiwan. We enrolled 76 patients with AF. To investigate the efficacy of propafenone, we used a wearable electrocardiogram (ECG) event recorder to evaluate the daily burden of AF episodes in patients for 24 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the frequency of AF with clinical significance, which was indicated by AF duration ≥30 seconds. The safety endpoints included proarrhythmic or hemodynamic adverse events. RESULT: To analyze the efficacy and safety of these agents, 71 patients (five patients with screen failure) were randomized to two groups, specifically a Rhynorm group (n = 37) and a Rytmonorm group (n = 34), for 24 weeks of the treatment period. The baseline patient characteristics were comparable between the groups. However, the Rhynorm group was older (65.4 ± 8.40 vs 59.8 ± 10.8 years; p = 0.02). The primary efficacy endpoint at week 24 decreased by 4.76% ± 18.5% (from 24.3% ± 33.9% to 19.0% ± 28.7%; p = 0.13) in the Rhynorm group and by 3.27% ± 15.2% (from 16.9% ± 26.4% to 13.6% ± 19.2%; p = 0.22) in the Rytmonorm group, with an intergroup difference of 1.5% ± 17.0%; p = 0.71. This finding indicates that Rhynorm is not inferior to Rytmonorm ( p = 0.023 for noninferiority). The safety profile of the agents was comparable between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Our results verified that Rhynorm was noninferior to Rytmonorm in terms of efficacy and safety for treating paroxysmal AF in Taiwan ( ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03674658).