Yolk Sac Differentiation in Endometrial Carcinoma: Incidence and Clinicopathologic Features of Somatically Derived Yolk Sac Tumors Versus Carcinomas With Nonspecific Immunoexpression of Yolk Sac Markers.

Endometrial somatically derived yolk sac tumors are characterized by yolk sac morphology with AFP, SALL-4, and/or Glypican-3 immunoexpression. Yolk sac marker expression, however, is not limited to tumors with overt yolk sac histology. Three hundred consecutive endometrial malignancies were assessed for immunomarkers of yolk sac differentiation. Of these, 9% expressed ≥1 yolk sac marker, including 29% of high-grade tumors. Only 3 (1%) met morphologic criteria for yolk sac differentiation; these were originally diagnosed as serous, high-grade NOS, and dedifferentiated carcinoma. Two were MMR-intact and comprised exclusively of yolk sac elements, while the dedifferentiated case was MMR deficient and had a background low-grade endometrioid carcinoma; this case also showed BRG1 loss. All 3 were INI1 intact. Nonspecific yolk sac marker expression was seen in 14 carcinosarcomas, 4 endometrioid, 2 serous, 1 clear cell, 1 dedifferentiated, 1 mixed serous/clear cell, and 1 mesonephric-like carcinoma. INI1 was intact in all cases; one showed BRG1 loss. Twenty were MMR-intact, and 4 were MMR deficient. All MMR-deficient cases with yolk sac marker expression, both with and without true yolk sac morphology, had no evidence of residual disease on follow-up, whereas 82% of MMR-intact cases developed recurrent/metastatic disease. In summary, endometrial somatically derived yolk sac tumors were rare but under-recognized. While AFP immunostaining was specific for this diagnosis, Glypican-3 and SALL-4 expression was seen in a variety of other high-grade carcinomas. INI1 loss was not associated with yolk sac morphology or immunomarker expression in the endometrium, and BRG1 loss was rare. All patients with MMR-deficient carcinomas with yolk sac immunoexpression +/- morphology were disease-free on follow-up, whereas the majority of MMR-intact cancers showed aggressive disease.

SMARCB1 deficient sinonasal carcinoma: An emerging entity with a diagnostic challenge.

SMARCB1 deficient sinonasal carcinomas are rare neoplasms, classified under sinonasal undifferentiated carcinomas by the fourth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of head and neck tumors. It is characterized immunohistochemically by loss of SMARCB1(INI1) expression. We are reporting the case of a 63-year-old man who was evaluated for nasal stuffiness of 3 months duration in another hospital where a radiological evaluation showed a polypoidal soft tissue lesion in the right maxillary sinus extending to the right nasal cavity and spheno-ethmoidal sinus. He underwent excision biopsy which was reported as non- keratinizing nasopharyngeal carcinoma. He was referred to our center with residual disease in spheno-ethmoidal recess for which radiotherapy was given. After completion of radiotherapy, the primary site had no residual disease, but while on follow-up he developed left sided neck nodes within 4 months of completion of treatment. Excision of the lesion was done and histopathological and immunohistochemical analysis revealed it to be metastasis from SMARCB1 deficient sinonasal carcinoma and not nasopharyngeal carcinoma as diagnosed from the other center. This case is being reported to highlight the diagnostic challenge associated with this rare entity.

SMARCB1(INI1)-deficient sinonasal adenocarcinoma: Report of a case previously diagnosed as high-grade non-intestinal-type sinonasal adenocarcinoma.

SMARCB1(INI1)-deficient sinonasal carcinoma is a recently recognized entity with wide histomorphologic spectrum. The classification of sinonasal adenocarcinoma (SNAC) is complex and yet to be redefined, especially the category of high-grade non-intestinal-type SNAC. Recently SMARCB1(INI1)-deficient SNACs with an unique oncocytoid/rhabdoid cytomorphology and variable degrees of glandular formation have been reported. Here we described a rare case of SMARCB1(INI1)-deficient SNAC composed of mainly oncocytoid/rhabdoid cells with mixed solid and cribriform patterns. This case was originally diagnosed as non-intestinal-type SNAC and was reclassified due to complete loss expression of SMARCB1(INI1) by immunohistochemistry (IHC). The SMARCB1(INI1) stain provides a valuable tool for identification of this specific type of SNAC. We compared this case with other SNACs diagnosed in our department and reviewed relevant literature for this specific type of SNAC.

Poorly differentiated chordoma showing loss of SMARCB1/INI1: Clinicopathological and radiological spectrum of nine cases, including uncommon features of a relatively under-recognized entity.

Poorly differentiated chordoma is a newly recognized entity in the recent World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of soft tissue and bone. Slightly over 60 such cases have been documented. Herein, we present a clinicopathological profile, including radiological features, of nine cases, which occurred in five males and four females, with age varying from 1 to 29 years (median = 43), in the cervical spine (n = 2), skull base (n = 2), clivus (n = 2), thoracic spine (n = 1) lumbar spine (n = 1) and coccyx (n = 1) Average tumor size was 4.8 cm. None of the 6-referral cases was diagnosed as a poorly differentiated chordoma at the referring laboratory. Histopathologically, all cases displayed a cellular tumor comprising polygonal cells (n = 9) displaying moderate to marked nuclear pleomorphism with prominent nucleoli (n = 7), eosinophilic (n = 9) to vacuolated cytoplasm (n = 7), rhabdoid morphology (n = 4), interspersed mitotic figures (n = 5), focal necrosis (n = 6) and inflammatory cells (n = 9). A single tumor displayed areas resembling classic chordoma, transitioning into poorly differentiated areas. There were multinucleate giant cells and physaliphorous cells in two tumors, each, respectively. Immunohistochemically, tumor cells were positive for AE1/AE3 (7/7), EMA (7/7), cytokeratin (CK) MNF116 (1/1), OSCAR (1/1), brachyury (9/9, diffusely), S100P (4/7, mostly focally), and glypican 3(2/4). SMARCB1/INI1 was completely lost in all nine tumors. A single case tested by FISH showed homozygous deletion of the SMARCB1 gene. Therapeutically (n = 7), all patients were treated with surgical resection (invariably incomplete) (n = 5), followed by adjuvant radiation therapy (n = 4) and chemotherapy (n = 4). While a single patient partially responded to treatment and another patient is alive with no evidence of disease after 23 years, three patients died of disease, six, eight, and 11 months post-diagnosis, despite adjuvant treatments. A single patient presented with a metastatic lung nodule, while another developed widespread metastasis. Poorly differentiated chordomas display a spectrum of features, are associated with a lower index of suspicion for a diagnosis, and display aggressive outcomes. Critical analysis of radiological and histopathological features, including necessary immunostains (brachyury and SMARCB1/INI1), is necessary for their timely diagnosis. These tumors show loss of SMARCB1/INI1 immunostaining and homozygous deletion of INI1/SMARCB1 gene.

The clinicopathological significance of SWI/SNF alterations in gastric cancer is associated with the molecular subtypes.

The clinicopathological significance of altered SWI/SNF complex has not been well evaluated in gastric cancer (GC). We examined SMARCA2, SMARCA4, SMARCB1 and ARID1A expression by immunohistochemistry in 1224 surgically resected GCs with subtyping into Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), microsatellite instability (MSI) and non-EBV/MSI Lauren histotypes. SWI/SNF mutations were investigated using the GC dataset of the TCGA Pan-Cancer Atlas. Clinicopathological association was assessed by statistical analysis. There were 427 cases (35%) of SWI/SNF-attenuated GC, including 344 SMARCA2 (28%), 28 SMARCA4 (2%), 11 SMARCB1 (1%) and 197 ARID1A (16%) cases. Simultaneous alterations of multiple subunits were observed. Compared to SWI/SNF-retained cases, SWI/SNF-attenuated GC exhibited a significant predilection to older ages, EBV and MSI genotypes, higher lymphatic invasion and less hematogenous recurrence (P < 0.05). SWI/SNF attenuation was an independent risk factor for short overall survival (P = 0.001, hazard ratio 1.360, 95% confidence interval 1.138-1.625). The survival impact stemmed from SMARCA2-attenuated GCs in stage III and non-EBV/MSI diffuse/mixed subtypes (P = 0.019 and < 0.001, respectively). ARID1A-lost/heterogeneous GCs were more aggressive in the EBV genotype (P = 0.016). SMARCB1 or SMARCA4 loss was not restricted to rhabdoid/undifferentiated carcinoma. In the TCGA dataset, 223 of 434 GCs (52%) harbored deleterious SWI/SNF mutations, including ARID1A (27%), SMARCA2 (9%), ARID2 (9%), ARID1B (8%), PBRM1 (7%), and SMARCA4 (7%). SWI/SNF-mutated GCs displayed a favorable outcome owing to the high percentage with the MSI genotype. In conclusion, SWI/SNF-altered GCs are common and the clinicopathological significance is related to the genotype.

Dedifferentiated Chordoma: Clinicopathologic and Molecular Characteristics With Integrative Analysis.

Dedifferentiated chordoma is a rare chordoma subtype characterized by a high-grade sarcoma juxtaposed to conventional chordoma. We identified a series of dedifferentiated chordomas, reviewed clinicopathologic features, performed next-generation sequencing in select cases, and analyzed all related English-language publications. Our series included 7 men and 3 women (age 15 to 80 y [median: 54 y]; <1% of >1000 chordomas surveyed). The tumor (2.8 to 24.5 cm [median: 5.8 cm] in size) presented de novo or as recurrence (including postradiotherapy) in sacrum (n=5), skull base (n=2), lumbar spine (n=1), thoracic/mediastinum (n=1), and lung (n=1; as metastasis). Histologically, the dedifferentiated component (3% to 95% [median: 60%]) was pleomorphic-to-fibrosarcomatous, juxtaposed to conventional (n=8) or chondroid (n=2) component. By immunohistochemistry, the conventional/chondroid component consistently expressed cytokeratin and brachyury, whereas the dedifferentiated component showed loss of both. We identified a sacral conventional chordoma with INI1 loss, with one of the lung metastases showing biphasic histology with loss of cytokeratin and brachyury in the dedifferentiated component. Sequencing identified tumor suppressor mutations in 4 tumors, including TP53 mutations in the dedifferentiated component in 3 tumors. Of 7 patients with follow-up, 6 developed metastases; 4 died at 15 to 99 months (median: 24 mo) after dedifferentiated chordoma diagnosis. Collectively, of 87 dedifferentiated chordoma patients described in 1913-2020 (including 10 herein), the median overall survival was 20 months. In summary, dedifferentiated chordoma involves diverse sites and presents de novo, postradiotherapy, or as recurrence/metastasis months-to-years after initial diagnosis. The dedifferentiated component shows loss of brachyury and cytokeratin staining and harbors recurrent TP53 mutations, implicating tumor suppressor dysregulation in chordoma dedifferentiation.

The SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex status in renal cell carcinomas with sarcomatoid or rhabdoid features.

The presence of sarcomatoid or rhabdoid features (which are associated with advanced disease and poor prognosis) is rarely observed in the subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex, which is composed of evolutionarily conserved core subunits including SMARCB1/INI1 (SMARCB1), SMARCA4/BRG1 (SMARCA4), SMARCC1/BAF155 (SMARCC1), and SMARCC2/BAF170 (SMARCC2), can be regarded as the prototype of an epigenetic regulator of gene expression that is involved in tumor suppression. We analyzed the histological, immunohistochemical, and clinicopathological status in 72 cases of RCC with sarcomatoid or rhabdoid features, focusing on the expression status of the subunits of SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex proteins. Cases with lost or reduced expression were defined as showing aberrant expression. The frequency of aberrant SMARCA4 immunoexpression of a sarcomatoid or rhabdoid component in clear cell RCC (ccRCC) (47/50, 94%) was significantly higher than that in non-ccRCC (4/9, 44%) (p < 0.001). In ccRCC without sarcomatoid or rhabdoid features, aberrant SMARCA4 immunoexpression was observed in 33 of 48 (67%) cases. Immunoreactivities for SMARCB1, SMARCA2, and SMARCC2 were retained in almost all subtypes of RCC. The patients with aberrant SMARCA4 expression in RCC with sarcomatoid or rhabdoid features achieved shorter progression-free survival compared with the patients with retained SMARCA4 expression (all subtypes of RCC, p = 0.0212; ccRCC, p = 0.0265). These results suggest that in ccRCC, aberrant SMARCA4 expression is one of the adverse prognostic factors or a high-grade malignant transforming factor. The evaluation of SMARCA4 immunoexpression may be a useful diagnostic tool to help distinguish ccRCC from non-ccRCC.

Switch/sucrose nonfermenting nucleosome complex-deficient colorectal carcinomas have distinct clinicopathologic features.

The switch/sucrose nonfermenting (SWI/SNF) nucleosome complex consists of several proteins that are involved in cellular proliferation and tumor suppression. The aim of this study was to correlate immunohistochemical expression of four SWI/SNF complex subunits, SMARCA2, SMARCB1, SMARCA4, and ARID1A, with clinicopathologic and molecular features and patient survival in 338 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma using a tissue microarray approach. Twenty-three (7%) colorectal adenocarcinomas demonstrated deficient SWI/SNF expression: 7 had SMARCA2 deficiency, 12 had ARID1A deficiency, and 4 had both SMARCA2 and ARID1A deficiency. No cases were SMARCB1 or SMARCA4 deficient. Twelve (52%) SWI/SNF complex-deficient tumors demonstrated mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency (p = 0.02), 6 (26%) showed medullary differentiation (p = 0.001), and 9 were negative for CDX2 expression (p < 0.001). Among the MMR-deficient SWI/SNF complex-deficient tumors, 8 were sporadic MLH1 deficient, and 4 were seen in patients with Lynch syndrome. Compared with tumors with ARID1A deficiency alone, SMARCA2-deficient tumors were less likely to exhibit MMR deficiency (27% vs. 75%, p = 0.04), medullary differentiation (0% vs. 50%, p = 0.01), and mucinous differentiation (0% vs. 42%, p = 0.04). Conventional gland-forming histology was more often identified in SMARCA2-deficient tumors (11/11, 100%) than in tumors with ARID1A deficiency alone (4/12, 33%) (p = 0.001). There was no difference in KRAS mutation, BRAF mutation, stage, disease-specific survival, or disease-free survival for patients stratified by SWI/SNF expression (all with p > 0.05). In conclusion, SMARCA2-deficient and ARID1A-deficient colorectal carcinomas had distinctly different clinicopathologic features, with ARID1A-deficient tumors exhibiting medullary and mucinous differentiation and MMR deficiency and SMARCA2-deficient tumors demonstrating conventional gland-forming histologic growth with less frequent MMR deficiency.

A Nonchordomatous-looking Chordoma: When INI-1 and Radiology Came to the Rescue!!!

SMARCB1/integrase interactor (INI)-1 is one of the core subunit proteins of the ATP-dependent SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex and acts as a tumor suppressor. INI-1 loss can be easily assessed using immunohistochemistry and is an important diagnostic clue for a histopathologist. Chordoma is a malignant tumor commonly occurring in the sacrococcygeal spine of adults and is characterized by nuclear expression of brachyury. Poorly differentiated chordoma, a morphologically and molecularly distinct entity, also shows nuclear brachyury positivity along with INI-1 loss. It usually occurs in children and has a predilection to involve the base of the skull. We describe a case of a poorly differentiated chordoma in a 5-year-old girl and discuss its unusual histomorphologic and immunohistochemical features.

Update on selected advances in the immunohistochemical and molecular genetic analysis of soft tissue tumors.

Although traditional morphological evaluation remains the cornerstone for the diagnosis of soft tissue tumors, ancillary diagnostic modalities such as immunohistochemistry and molecular genetic analysis are of ever-increasing importance in this field. New insights into the molecular pathogenesis of soft tissue tumors, often obtained from high-throughput sequencing technologies, has enabled significant progress in the characterization and biologic stratification of mesenchymal neoplasms, expanding the spectrum of immunohistochemical tests (often aimed towards recently discovered genetic events) and molecular genetic assays (most often fluorescence in situ hybridization and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction). This review discusses selected novel molecular and immunohistochemical assays with diagnostic applicability in mesenchymal neoplasms, with emphasis on diagnosis, refinement of tumor classification, and treatment stratification.

Recurrent SMARCB1 Inactivation in Epithelioid Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors.

Epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors (EMPNST) are characterized by diffuse S-100 and SOX10 positivity, frequent immunohistochemical loss of SMARCB1 expression (70%), and rare association with neurofibromatosis type 1. Some cases arise in a preexisting epithelioid schwannoma (ESCW), which also show SMARCB1 loss in 40% of cases. To date, little is known about the genomic landscape of this distinctive variant of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor. The aim of this study was to use targeted next-generation sequencing to identify recurrent genomic aberrations in EMPNST and a subset of ESCW, including the basis of SMARCB1 loss. Sixteen EMPNSTs (13 SMARCB1-lost, 3 SMARCB1-retained) and 5 ESCWs with SMARCB1 loss were selected for the cohort. Sequencing identified SMARCB1 gene inactivation in 12/16 (75%) EMPNST and all 5 (100%) ESCW through homozygous deletion (N=8), nonsense (N=7), frameshift (N=2), or splice site (N=2) mutations; 2 EMPNSTs harbored 2 concurrent mutations each. SMARCB1 immunohistochemistry status and SMARCB1 alterations were concordant in 20/21 of the sequenced tumors. Additional genetic alterations in a subset of EMPNST included inactivation of CDKN2A and gain of chromosome 2q. Among SMARCB1-wild-type EMPNSTs there were single cases each with NF1 and NF2 mutations. No cases had SUZ12 or EED mutations. In summary, we identified recurrent SMARCB1 alterations in EMPNST (and all 5 SMARCB1-negative ESCWs tested), supporting loss of SMARCB1 tumor suppressor function as a key oncogenic event. SMARCB1-retained EMPNSTs lack SMARCB1 mutations and harbor different driver events.

SMARCB1 (INI1)-deficient sinonasal carcinoma: a series of 13 cases with assessment of histologic patterns.

A significant proportion of sinonasal malignancies comprise poorly differentiated/undifferentiated carcinomas that defy accurate histologic classification and behave aggressively. Recent years have seen a refinement of this spectrum by inclusion of novel entities harboring specific genetic alterations, including SMARCB1 (INI1)-deficient sinonasal carcinoma (SDSC), characterized by inactivating alterations in SMARCB1 gene, as demonstrated by loss of INI1 immunoexpression. Cyclin D1 is a cell-cycle regulatory protein downstream of INI1. Loss of INI1 leads to derepression of cyclin D1 transcription, suggesting its role as a putative therapeutic target. However, cyclin D1 expression has not been assessed in SDSCs. We retrieved all sinonasal carcinomas, including sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma, undifferentiated carcinoma, poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma, and adenocarcinoma. Histopathologic features were reviewed. INI1 immunohistochemistry was performed. Cyclin D1 was performed in cases showing INI1 loss. Loss of INI1 staining was seen in 13 cases (5.8%), including 11 males and 2 females (age range, 11-65 years). Original diagnoses included SDSC (3/13), sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma (3/13), adenocarcinoma (3/13), poorly differentiated squamous cell carcinoma (2/13), and poorly differentiated carcinoma (2/13). Tumors were predominantly basaloid in 6 cases and plasmacytoid/rhabdoid in 5 cases. We identified 2 cases having oncocytoid cells arranged in a gland-like pattern. Significant cyclin D1 immunoexpression was absent. SDSC is a rare, emerging entity that resembles a poorly differentiated carcinoma. Histomorphologic spectrum of these tumors is evolving. In addition to basaloid and plasmacytoid/rhabdoid cells, oncocytoid/adenocarcinoma-like pattern can also be seen in SDSC and predicts INI1 loss. These histologic patterns can further be subjected to INI1 immunohistochemistry for correct diagnosis.

SWI/SNF Chromatin-remodeling Complex Status in SMARCB1/INI1-preserved Epithelioid Sarcoma.

The SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex, which is composed of evolutionarily conserved core subunits such as SMARCB1/INI1 (INI1), SMARCA4/BRG1 (BRG1), SMARCC1/BAF155 (BAF155), and SMARCC2/BAF170 (BAF170), can be viewed as the prototype of an epigenetic regulator of gene expression that is involved in tumor suppression. Epithelioid sarcoma, which classified as a tumor of uncertain differentiation, shows an almost complete loss of INI1. However, some cases of epithelioid sarcoma have preserved INI1, and the clinicopathologic features of these cases are uncertain. To date, there has been no investigation focused on the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex in INI1-preserved epithelioid sarcoma cases. First, an investigation of INI1 immunoexpression statuses in 60 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded epithelioid sarcoma specimens (proximal type, 29 cases; conventional type, 31 cases) was performed. In the available INI1-preserved epithelioid sarcoma cases, we analyzed the BRG1, BAF155, and BAF170 protein expressions. INI1 preservation was observed in 6 of 29 (21%) proximal-type and 2 of 31 (6%) conventional-type epithelioid sarcoma cases. Six cases of INI1-preserved epithelioid sarcomas of proximal type were available for further immunohistochemical study. One proximal type showed loss of BAF170, and 2 proximal-type cases revealed loss of BRG1 with preservation of the other remaining core subunit proteins. One proximal-type case showed a mosaic pattern of BRG1 and loss of BAF155. However, in the remaining 2 proximal-type cases, all core subunit proteins were preserved. Overall, these results suggest that loss of expression of SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex proteins has an important role in tumorigenesis. The remaining 2 INI1-preserved epithelioid sarcoma cases may have had other abnormalities causing dysfunction of SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling.

Sinonasal SMARCB1 (INI1) Deficient Carcinoma With Yolk Sac Tumor Differentiation: Report of a Case and Comparison With INI1 Expression in Gonadal Germ Cell Tumors.

SMARCB1 (INI1) deficient sinonasal carcinoma is a recently recognized entity with wide histomorphologic spectrum. We present a case of this carcinoma that contained, in addition to a "common" morphology, scattered foci of yolk sac tumor differentiation. The tumor occurred in paranasal sinuses in a 44-year-old woman. Immunohistochemically, it was diffusely negative for INI1, whereas an expression of yolk sac tumor markers (α-fetoprotein, glypican-3, CDX2) was limited to the yolk sac tumor component. For comparison with the present case, we performed INI1 immunostaining on a series of 11 gonadal germ cell tumors with yolk sac tumor differentiation. All of these cases showed strong and diffuse expression of INI1, in contrast with the present sinonasal tumor. Our findings expand the morphologic spectrum of SMARCB1 (INI1) deficient sinonasal carcinoma. In addition, we show preliminarily that gonadal germ cell tumors with yolk sac tumor differentiation are not SMARCB1/INI1-deficient.

Histology and grading are important prognostic factors in synovial sarcoma.

INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of synovial sarcoma (SS) is currently based on clinical, morphological, immunohistochemical and cytogenetic data. Some of these factors such as grade and histology, specific translocations (SS18-SSX1 vs. SS18-SSX2) and the reduced expression of INI1, were proposed as prognostic variables. The aim of this study was to verify whether histological (grading and histology) and molecular (type of SSX translocation and INI1 expression) characteristics of SS influence the prognosis of the disease. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 196 patients affected by SS of the extremities treated at our Institution (Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy). All cases were histologically revised and tumor grade was assessed according to the FNLCC system. Tissue specimens were retrospectively evaluated to check for SS18-SSX fusion type and INI1 expression. RESULTS: Most SS were monophasic, 28% were biphasic. Eighty tumors (41%) were grade 3. Sixty percent harbored SSX1 translocation, 40% SSX2; 51% maintained the expression of INI1. Sarcoma specific survival (OS) was 56.6% at 5 years and 46.9% at 10 years. Prognosis was worse in those patients monophasic SS (p = 0.011) as in those with a grade 3 tumors (p = 0.083). No correlation was found neither between SSX fusion type nor INI1 expression and survival. LR-free survival was 78.9% at 5 years and 75.9% at 10 years. A higher LR rate was observed in tumors with SSX2 translocation and (p = 0.049) in grade 3 SS (0 = 0.028). DISCUSSION: Our data confirm that not all cases of SS present the same severe outcome. High-risk patients identified on the basis of these parameters may qualify for an aggressive treatment approach.

Clinicopathologic features and immunohistochemical spectrum of 11 cases of epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, including INI1/SMARCB1 results and BRAF V600E analysis.

Epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) is a rare, relatively less chemosensitive sarcoma. We report clinicopathologic features of 11 epithelioid MPNSTs, including rare forms, along with INI1 immunostaining and BRAF V600E mutation results. BRAF V600E mutation was tested by Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technique. Eleven tumors occurred in six men and five women (M:F ratio = 0.85:1) within an age range of 5-73 years (average = 44), mostly in lower limbs (five), followed by upper limbs (four). Tumor size (n = 6), varied from 3.1 to 15 cm (average = 8.3). Histopathologically, most tumors were multilobular, characterized by epithelioid to round-shaped, malignant cells, along with spindle cells (three cases), "rhabdoid-like" cells (seven cases) and pleomorphic giant cells (single case). By immunohistochemistry, tumor cells were positive for S100 protein (11/11) (100%), EMA (3/7) (42.8%), pan CK(2/7) (28.5%), and HMB45 (1/11) (9%), while these were negative for Melan A (0/11) and INI1 (3/11), including a single tumor, displaying HMB45 positivity. BRAF V600E mutation was positive in 1/8 cases, that lacked melanocytic marker expression. All patients (n = 5) were treated by surgical resection. During follow-up (n = 8, median duration = 23 months), four patients developed tumor recurrences and four developed metastasis, mostly to lymph nodes (3). Finally, four patients were alive with disease, two were alive with no evidence of disease, and two patients died of disease. Epithelioid MPNSTs have a diverse histopathologic spectrum. Loss of INI1 is useful, including in identifying rare forms of epithelioid MPNST, displaying melanocytic differentiation. Most tumors are treated by surgical resection. Loss of INI1 and the presence of BRAF V600E mutation in some cases raises future possibility of exploring targeted therapy in those, rare epithelioid MPNSTs.

Ossifying fibromyxoid tumor: a study of 6 cases of atypical and malignant variants.

Ossifying fibromyxoid tumors (OFMT) of soft parts are rare, slow-growing tumors that have potential for local recurrence and may metastasize. While OFMT originally was considered benign, several cases of malignant OFMT have been documented. There is no universally accepted risk stratification, although this study emphasizes the importance of utilizing histology, immunohistochemistry and FISH in establishing the diagnosis. Herein, we describe six cases of atypical and malignant OFMT with differences in morphologic features, 5 of which display the proposed morphological criteria for malignancy. The patients were mostly male (M=5, F=1) with an age range of 33-69 years. The tumors arose from the extremities (3 cases), the shoulder (1 case), the head and neck area (1 case), and the paraspinal area (1 case). One tumor had high grade and overtly sarcomatous changes, while another invaded the underlying clavicle. Two cases showed cytological atypia and necrosis. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) detected rearrangement of the PHF1 gene in 5 cases. All cases were positive for EAAT4 and actin by immunohistochemistry, while negative for desmin. Three tumors were immunoreactive for S100 protein. INI-1 immunohistochemical staining was conserved in all but 2 cases in which a mosaic loss of expression was noted. All but two patients are currently alive and free of disease.

Loss of expression of SMARCA4 (BRG1), SMARCA2 (BRM) and SMARCB1 (INI1) in undifferentiated carcinoma of the endometrium is not uncommon and is not always associated with rhabdoid morphology.

AIM: Abnormalities of SMARCB1 (INI1), which encodes a member of the SWI/SNF pathway, are found in neoplasms with rhabdoid morphology, such as malignant rhabdoid tumour of the kidney and atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumour of the central nervous system. SMARCA4 (BRG1), which encodes another member of the SWI/SNF pathway, and which is mutated in almost all small-cell carcinomas of the ovary, hypercalcaemic type, has been investigated in endometrial carcinomas, and mutations with resultant loss of immunohistochemical staining have been demonstrated in some endometrial undifferentiated carcinomas/dedifferentiated carcinomas. The aim of this study was to evaluate immunohistochemical expression of SMARCA4, SMARCB1 and SMARCA2 in a cohort of undifferentiated endometrial carcinomas, and to correlate expression of these markers with rhabdoid morphology and clinical outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty undifferentiated endometrial carcinomas (18 pure and 22 dedifferentiated carcinomas) were stained with SMARCA4 (n = 40), SMARCB1 (n = 27), and SMARCA2 (n = 37). SMARCA4 expression was intact in 26 of 40 (65%) cases, lost in 13 of 40 (32.5%) cases, and unassessable in one case (2.5%). SMARCB1 expression was intact in 26 of 27 (96%) cases and lost in one of 27 (4%) cases. SMARCA2 expression was intact in 23 of 37 (62%) cases, lost in 10 of 37 (27%) cases, and unassessable in four cases. SMARCA2 expression showed corresponding loss in nine of the 13 (69%) SMARCA4-deficient cases. Rhabdoid morphology was present in three of 13 (23%) SMARCA4-deficient cases, in two of 10 (20%) SMARCA2-deficient cases, in four of 26 (15%) SMARCA4-intact cases, and in four of 23 (17%) SMARCA2-intact cases. There was no correlation between SMARCA4 or SMARCA2 expression and clinical outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrated that almost one-third of endometrial undifferentiated carcinomas show loss of SMARCA4 and SMARCA2 expression, and that a subset show rhabdoid morphology. The majority of the SMARCA4-deficient cases show concomitant loss of SMARCA2 expression. There is no correlation between SMARCA4 or SMARCA2 expression and outcome. Our results confirm that the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodelling complex is involved in the pathogenesis of endometrial undifferentiated carcinomas.

Primary epithelioid sarcoma of the kidney and adrenal gland: report of 2 cases with immunohistochemical and molecular cytogenetic studies.

Epithelioid sarcoma (ES) is a malignant mesenchymal neoplasm with some morphologic or immunophenotypic evidence of epithelial differentiation. The "classic" subtype occurs in younger patients, often in distal extremities as compared with the "proximal" type. Tumors of the proximal type primarily arising in solid organs are rare with only few case reports in the literature. We report 2 cases of primary ES in the kidney of a 27-year-old woman and the adrenal gland of a 73-year-old man. Clinical examination and imaging, including computed tomography and positron-emission tomography, did not reveal tumor elsewhere in both cases. Histologic features were those of ES, proximal type with epithelioid/rhabdoid phenotype. Immunohistochemical study in both cases showed strong, diffuse expression of epithelial markers, CD34, and CD31. Nuclear expression of SMARCB1 protein was lost, but fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis was negative for SMARCB1 deletion. We believe that these are the first reports of primary kidney and adrenal gland ES.