Safety and efficacy of the human neutrophil elastase inhibitor BAY 85-8501 for the treatment of non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: A randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: There are only limited treatment options for patients with non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (non-CF BE). Human neutrophil elastase (HNE) is a mediator of tissue destruction in non-CF BE. BAY 85-8501, a selective and reversible HNE inhibitor, could represent a new treatment option for this disease. METHODS: This was a phase 2a, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, parallel-group study. The primary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of 1 mg BAY 85-8501 once daily (OD) for 28 days compared with placebo in patients with non-CF BE. Secondary objectives were to investigate the effects of 4 weeks of treatment with BAY 85-8501 on health-related quality of life, pulmonary function, and inflammatory and tissue damage biomarkers in sputum, blood and/or urine, and to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of BAY 85-8501. RESULTS: Overall, 94 patients (mean age, 66 years; 53% male) were randomized (n = 47 per group), and 82 completed the study (BAY 85-8501, n = 37; placebo, n = 45). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 31 patients (66%) taking BAY 85-8501 and in 36 patients (77%) taking placebo, and were mostly mild or moderate. The serious TEAEs (BAY 85-8501, n = 3; placebo, n = 1) were not considered to be study-drug related. There were no changes in pulmonary function parameters from baseline to end of treatment, and health-related quality of life did not improve in any group. HNE activity in blood after zymosan challenge decreased significantly with BAY 85-8501 treatment (P = 0.0250 versus placebo). There were no significant differences in other biomarkers between treatment groups, with the exception of a small increase in interleukin-8 levels in sputum in the BAY 85-8501 group. Trough plasma concentrations of BAY 85-8501 plateaued after 2 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: 1 mg BAY 85-8501 OD had a favourable safety and tolerability profile when administered for 28 days to patients with non-CF BE. Further studies with a longer treatment duration are needed to evaluate the potential clinical efficacy in this study population.

Study on Perioperative Administration of a Neutrophil Elastase Inhibitor for Interstitial Pneumonias.

BACKGROUND: Although acute exacerbation of idiopathic interstitial pneumonias (IIPs) is a lethal complication after pulmonary resection for lung cancer with IIPs, there are no established methods to prevent its occurrence. This prospective randomized study was conducted to evaluate whether perioperative administration of the neutrophil elastase inhibitor sivelestat prevents acute exacerbation after surgery. METHODS: The IIP patients with suspected lung cancers were randomly assigned to two groups before surgery: in group A (n = 65), sivelestat was perioperatively administered for 5 days; in group B (n = 65), no medications were administered. The primary endpoint was the frequency of acute exacerbation of IIPs. The secondary endpoints were perioperative changes in the lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein, sialylated carbohydrate antigen, surfactant protein D and surfactant protein A values, and the safety of preoperative administration of sivelestat. Multivariate analyses were performed using a logistic regression model to identify the factors that predicted acute exacerbation. RESULTS: Acute exacerbation developed in 2 patients in group A and 1 patient in group B (p = 0.559). Administration of sivelestat did not contribute to decreasing the acute exacerbation as well as short- and long-term mortality. The differences were not statistically significant in perioperative lactate dehydrogenase, C-reactive protein, sialylated carbohydrate antigen, and surfactant protein D and A levels. No subjective adverse events were observed. A preoperative partial pressure oxygen level of less than 70 mm Hg was the only predictive factor identified in the logistic analysis (p = 0.019, hazard ratio 19.2). CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative administration of neutrophil elastase inhibitor appeared to be safe; however, it could not prevent the development of acute exacerbation after surgery in lung cancer patients with IIPs.

Phase II study of a neutrophil elastase inhibitor (AZD9668) in patients with bronchiectasis.

UNLABELLED: Neutrophil elastase (NE) activity is increased in bronchiectasis and may play a role in this condition. We wished to determine the effect of AZD9668, a selective oral inhibitor of NE. Efficacy and safety of AZD9668 60 mg twice daily over 4 weeks were evaluated in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, Phase II, signal-searching study in patients with bronchiectasis. Outcome measures included: waking and post-waking sputum neutrophil counts; lung function tests; 24-h sputum weight; BronkoTest(®) diary card data; St George's Respiratory Questionnaire for COPD patients (SGRQ-C); sputum NE activity; inflammatory biomarker levels; desmosine levels; adverse events, safety haematology and biochemistry. AZD9668 levels in plasma and sputum were measured to confirm exposure. Thirty-eight patients were randomised: 16 to placebo and 22 to AZD9668. There was no change in sputum neutrophils with AZD9668. Forced expiratory volume in 1 s improved by 100 mL in the AZD9668 group compared with placebo (p = 0.006). Significant changes (defined a priori as p < 0.1) in favour of AZD9668 were also seen in slow vital capacity, plasma interleukin-8, and post-waking sputum interleukin-6 and Regulated on Activation, Normal T-cell Expressed and Secreted levels. Non-significant changes in favour of AZD9668 were seen in other lung function tests, sputum weight and the SGRQ-C. AZD9668 was well tolerated. In this small signal-searching study, 4 weeks' treatment with AZD9668 improved lung function in patients with bronchiectasis and there were trends for reductions in sputum inflammatory biomarkers. Larger studies of longer duration would be needed to confirm the potential benefits of this agent in bronchiectasis. REGISTRATION: NCT00769119.

Reevaluation of the efficacy and safety of the neutrophil elastase inhibitor, Sivelestat, for the treatment of acute lung injury associated with systemic inflammatory response syndrome; a phase IV study.

INTRODUCTION: Sivelestat, a neutrophil elastase inhibitor, has been approved in Japan for the treatment of patients with acute lung injury (ALI) associated with systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS). The Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) has ordered to conduct a postmarket clinical study in order to reevaluate the efficacy and safety of Sivelestat in actual clinical settings in Japan. METHODS: According to the PMDA's order, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of Sivelestat in Japanese patients with ALI associated with SIRS using ventilator-free days (VFD) as the primary endpoint. The surrogate endpoints are ventilator-weaning rate, ICU discharge rate, and 180-day survival rate. Study design was an open-label, non-randomized, multi-center clinical trial. Sivelestat was intravenously administered at 0.2 mg/kg/h continuously for a maximum of 14 days. Sivelestat group and control group were compared by adjusting the outcome values using an inverse probability of treatment weighted method based on the propensity scores. RESULTS: Four hundred and four Sivelestat group patients and 177 control group patients were enrolled. The adjusted mean number of VFD was 15.7 and 12.1 in the Sivelestat group and control group, respectively (P = 0.0022). Both the adjusted ventilator-weaning rate and ICU discharge rate were significantly higher in the Sivelestat group than in the control group (P = 0.0028 and P = 0.019, respectively). The adjusted 180-day survival rate was significantly higher in the Sivelestat group than in the control group (71.8 percent vs. 56.3 percent). CONCLUSIONS: Sivelestat contributed to early weaning from the mechanical ventilation, while showing no negative effect on the long-term outcomes of ALI associated with SIRS. The results of this study suggest the clinical usefulness of Sivelestat in this patient population.