Salivary toxicity from PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceuticals: What we have learned and where we are going.

Clinical trials of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeted radiopharmaceuticals have shown encouraging results. Some agents, like lutetium-177 [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 ([177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617), are already approved for late line treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Projections are for continued growth of this treatment modality; [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 is being studied both in earlier stages of disease and in combination with other anti-cancer therapies. Further, the drug development pipeline is deep with variations of PSMA-targeting radionuclides, including higher energy alpha particles conjugated to PSMA-honing vectors. It is safe to assume that an increasing number of patients will be exposed to PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceuticals during the course of their cancer treatment. In this setting, it is important to better understand and mitigate the most commonly encountered toxicities. One particularly vexing side effect is xerostomia. In this review, we discuss the scope of the problem, inventories to better characterize and monitor this troublesome side effect, and approaches to preserve salivary function and effectively palliate symptoms. This article aims to serve as a useful reference for prescribers of PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceuticals, while also commenting on areas of missing data and opportunities for future research.

Lutetium-177 Labelled Anti-PSMA Monoclonal Antibody (Lu-TLX591) Therapy for Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Treatment Toxicity and Outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Whilst prostate cancer is the fourth most common cancer globally, effective therapies for patients with advanced disease are lacking. In recent years, interest in using theranostic agents to treat castrate-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and metastatic prostate cancer has emerged. Lu-TLX591 monoclonal antibody is a potential agent of significance; however, to date, reports on its toxicity and efficacy have been limited to small clinical trials in heavily pretreated patients. This retrospective study describes the real-world toxicity and efficacy profile of Lu-TLX591. METHODS: Eighteen patients received Lu-TLX591 at two private oncology centres in Australia. Patients were eligible if they had CRPC or metastatic prostate cancer and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-avid disease confirmed by PSMA-positron emission tomography (PET). Patients received two cycles of Lu-TLX591 monoclonal antibody (177 Lu-DOTA-rosopatamab) each dosed from 1.01-2.85 GBq, 14 days apart. Patient side effects, blood test results and radiology reports were recorded on the patient's electronic medical record (eMR). RESULTS: Prominent side effects included fatigue (55.6%), anorexia (16.7%), nausea (11.1%), and transfusion reactions (11.1%). All-grade haematological toxicities included lymphopenia (61.1%), anaemia (22.2%), leukopenia (27.8%), neutropenia (27.8%), and thrombocytopenia (27.8%). Grade 4 toxicity included lymphopenia (6.7%) and thrombocytopenia (6.7%). Patients' prostate-specific antigen (PSA) responses were as follows; ≥ 30% PSA decline (27.8%), ≥ 50% PSA decline (11.4%) and any PSA decline (38.9%). Follow-up radiology revealed 54.5% stable disease, 45.4% disease progression and 9.1% disease regression. CONCLUSION: Lu-TLX591 was safely administered at acceptable toxicity and its efficacy reflects previous clinical trials. Larger studies are required and are underway (NCT04786847; NCT05146973; NCT04876651) to determine Lu-TLX591 effectiveness amongst different prostate cancer populations and compare its efficacy against peptide-based radiopharmaceutical agents.

A multicentric, single arm, open-label, phase I/II study evaluating PSMA targeted radionuclide therapy in adult patients with metastatic clear cell renal cancer (PRadR).

BACKGROUND: Despite advancements in managing metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma (mccRCC) through antiangiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors and immunotherapy, there remains a demand for novel treatments for patients experiencing progression despite the use of these medications. There is currently no established standard treatment for patients receiving third therapy line. Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) whose high expression has been demonstrated in metastatic aggressive prostate adenocarcinoma is also highly expressed in neovessels of various solid tumors including renal cell carcinoma (RCC): 86% of clear cell RCC, 61% of chromophobe RCC, and 28% of papillary RCC. Therefore, PSMA may be a target expressed in metastatic ccRCC for radionuclide therapy using PSMA ligands radiolabeled with Lutetium-177 (PRLT). 177Lu-PSMA delivers ß-particle radiation to PSMA-expressing cells and the surrounding microenvironment with demonstrated efficacy in metastatic prostate cancer. METHODS: This is a multicenter phase I/II study designed to assess the tolerability and effectiveness of 177Lu-PSMA-1 in individuals with PSMA-positive metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), identified through 68Ga-PSMA PET, conducted in France (PRadR). 48 patients will be treated with 4 cycles of 7.4 GBq of 177Lu-PSMA-1 every 6 weeks. The primary objective is to evaluate the safety of 177Lu-PSMA-1 (phase I) and the efficacy of 177Lu-PSMA-1 in mccRCC patients (phase II). Primary endpoints are incidence of Severe Toxicities (ST) occurring during the first cycle (i.e. 6 first weeks) and disease Control Rate after 24 weeks of treatment (DCR24w) as per RECIST V1.1. Secondary objective is to further document the clinical activity of 177Lu-PSMA-1 in mccRCC patients (duration of response (DoR), best overall response rate (BORR), progression fee survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). DISCUSSION: Our prospective study may lead to new potential indications for the use of 177Lu-PSMA-1 in mccRCC patients and should confirm the efficacy and safety of this radionuclide therapy with limited adverse events. The use of 177Lu-PSMA-1may lead to increase disease control, objective response rate and the quality of life in mccRCC patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06059014.

Long-term Nephrotoxicity after PRRT: Myth or Reality.

Rationale: The kidneys are commonly considered as the potential dose-limiting organ for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT), making the risk of nephrotoxicity a primary concern. This retrospective analysis with prospective documentation and long-term follow-up aims to assess the risk of nephrotoxicity after PRRT in a large cohort of patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) treated at our institution over the past 18 years. Methods: A total of 1361 NEN patients treated with 1-10 cycles of 177Lu-DOTA-TOC/-NOC/-TATE, 90Y-DOTA-TOC/-NOC/-TATE, DUO-PRRT (sequential administration of 90Y- and 177Lu-), or TANDEM-PRRT (combination of 90Y- and 177Lu- on the same day concomitantly) were included in this analysis. All parameters were prospectively documented in a structured database comprising over 250 items per patient and retrospectively analyzed. Kidney function, including serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, cGFR, and electrolytes, was evaluated before each PRRT cycle and during follow-up. Restaging was regularly performed at 6-month intervals until death. Treatment-related adverse events were graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE v.5.0). Results: Between 2000 and 2018, a total of 5409 cycles of PRRT were administered to 1361 NEN patients. Follow-up after complete treatment was available for 1281 patients receiving 4709 cycles of PRRT, with a median follow-up time of 69.2 months (interquartile range, 32.8-110.5 months) and a maximum follow-up time of 175 months. Baseline creatinine levels were normal in 1039/1281 (81.1%) subjects, while grade 1 (G1) renal insufficiency was present in 221/1281 (17.3%) prior to PRRT. G2 was present in 19/1281 (1.5%), and G3 in 2/1281 (0.2%). After treatment, the proportion of G3/G4 grade patients only increased from 0.2% to 0.7%. Mean creatinine levels increased from a baseline of 0.90 ± 0.30 to 1.01 ± 0.57 mg/L (80.0 ± 26.7 to 89.4 ± 50.8 µmol/L) after treatment. In our main analysis cohort of 1244 patients (4576 cycles), 200 patients experienced an increase in CTCAE creatinine grade. Age, number of treatment cycles, type of radionuclides, and length of follow-up time were the main factors affecting CTCAE creatinine grading after treatment. When comparing the subgroups treated with different radionuclides, the risk of nephrotoxicity after 90Y treatment alone and the 90Y/177Lu combination group was higher than after 177Lu treatment alone. In the 90Y treatment subgroup, the two significant risk factors for an increased CTCAE creatinine grade were identified to be age (≥60) and a long follow-up time. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis with prospective documentation in a large cohort of 1281 NEN patients receiving 4709 cycles of PRRT co-administered with renal protection, treated through the individualized approach at a single institution over 18 years, did not reveal any evidence of long-term PRRT-related renal toxicity. The results of our study suggest that with the use of proper renal protection, nephrotoxicity due to PRRT is more likely a myth than a reality.

Bone-modifying agents are protective for symptomatic skeletal events in Radium-223 treatment.

INTRODUCTION: Radium-223 (Ra-223) dichloride therapy increases overall survival and delays time to the first symptomatic skeletal event (SSE) in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) and bone metastases. Bone-modifying agents (BMA) reduce SSE in patients with bone metastasis, but there is little information on their use with Ra-223. This study aimed to investigate the effect of BMA on SSE in patients with bone metastatic CRPC treated with Ra-223 in real-world practice. METHODS: We included 73 patients treated with Ra-223 from 10 institutions in Japan. Time to the first SSE was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups using the log-rank test. We used univariate analysis to ascertain the association between variables and SSE. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 12.7 months (interquartile range, 7-21.7), 12 (16.4%) patients presented SSE. Age and BMA use were different between men with and without SSE. The 1-year SSE-free survival rate from Ra-223 treatment initiation was 82.4% (95% CI, 69.4%-90.2%). BMA use was associated with favorable SSE-free survival (hazard risk, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.061-0.85; p = 0.027). Two (4.7%) and seven (23.3%) patients presented symptomatic pathological bone fracture in groups with and without BMA use, respectively (p = 0.017). CONCLUSION: This study stresses the importance of BMA use in patients with CRPC and bone metastases in Ra-223 treatment.

Phase I evaluation of CycloSam® (Sm-153-DOTMP) bone seeking radiopharmaceutical in dogs with spontaneous appendicular osteosarcoma.

153 Sm-DOTMP (CycloSam® ) is a newly-patented radiopharmaceutical for bone tumor treatment. DOTMP (1,4,7,10-tetraazacyclododecane-1,4,7,10-tetramethylene-phosphonate) is a macrocyclic chelating agent with superior binding properties to 153 Sm when compared with EDTMP (Quadramet™, used for palliative treatment of bone cancer). CycloSam® was administered at 1 mCi/kg (37 MBq/kg) in a prospective pilot study to seven dogs with bone cancer resulting in no myelosuppression. Then, 13 dogs were enrolled in a prospective clinical trial study using traditional 3+3 dose escalation and starting at 1.5 mCi/kg. Baseline evaluation included hematologic and biochemical testing, diagnosis confirmation, thoracic and limb radiographs, technetium-99 m-HDP bone scintigraphy, and 18 F-FDG PET scan (SUVmax). Toxicity (primary endpoint) was assessed through weekly blood counts and adverse events. Dogs received 1.5 mCi/kg (n = 4), 1.75 mCi/kg (n = 6), and 2 mCi/kg (n = 3) of 153 Sm-DOTMP. Dose-limiting neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were seen at 2 mCi/kg. No dose-limiting nonhematologic toxicities occurred. Efficacy (secondary endpoint) was assessed by objective lameness measurement (body-mounted inertial sensors), owner quality-of-life (QoL) questionnaire, and repeat PET scan. Objective lameness measurement improved in four dogs (53%-60% decrease) was equivocal in three dogs, and worsened in four dogs (66%-115% increase); two dogs were not evaluable. Repeat 18 F-FDG PET scan results varied and change in lameness did not consistently correlate with SUVmax changes. QoL score worsened (n = 5) or was improved/stable (n = 7). Carboplatin chemotherapy (300 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks ×4) started 4 weeks after 153 Sm-DOTMP injection. No dog died of chemotherapy-related complications. All dogs completed study monitoring. The recommended dose for CycloSam® in dogs is 1.75 mCi/kg, which resulted in some pain control with minimal toxicity and was safely combined with chemotherapy.

Alpha radiation from polymetallic nodules and potential health risks from deep-sea mining.

In search for critical elements, polymetallic nodules at the deep abyssal seafloor are targeted for mining operations. Nodules efficiently scavenge and retain several naturally occurring uranium-series radioisotopes, which predominantly emit alpha radiation during decay. Here, we present new data on the activity concentrations of thorium-230, radium-226, and protactinium-231, as well as on the release of radon-222 in and from nodules from the NE Pacific Ocean. In line with abundantly published data from historic studies, we demonstrate that the activity concentrations for several alpha emitters are often higher than 5 Bq g-1 at the surface of the nodules. These observed values can exceed current exemption levels by up to a factor of 1000, and even entire nodules commonly exceed these limits. Exemption levels are in place for naturally occurring radioactive materials (NORM) such as ores and slags, to protect the public and to ensure occupational health and radiation safety. In this context, we discuss three ways of radiation exposure from nodules, including the inhalation or ingestion of nodule fines, the inhalation of radon gas in enclosed spaces and the potential concentration of some radioisotopes during nodule processing. Seen in this light, inappropriate handling of polymetallic nodules poses serious health risks.

Radiation protection aspects for alpha therapies.

The use of alpha emitting radiotherapeutics is increasing, with further growth expected due to a number of clinical trials currently running involving new alpha emitters. However, literature concerning radiation safety aspects of alpha emitting radionuclides is limited and most of the available literature concerns 223Ra. In general, the occupational exposure from alpha emitting radionuclides is expected to be low, as are doses to the public from external exposure. However, care must be taken to avoid skin contamination, inhalation, and ingestion. Not all alpha emitting radionuclides are identical, they often have very different associated decay chains and emissions. The decay chains and the manufacturing process should be carefully examined to identify any long-lived progeny or impurities. These may have an impact on the radiation safety processes required to limit occupational exposure and for waste management. Doses to the public must also be assessed, either arising directly from exposure to patients treated with radiotherapeutics, or via waste streams. Risk assessments should be in place when starting a new service covering all aspects of the preparation and administration, as well as any foreseeable incidents such as skin contamination or patient death, and the appropriate steps to take in these instances. It is imperative that with the increase in the use of alpha emitting radiotherapeutics more literature is published on radiation safety aspects, especially for new alpha emitting radiotherapeutics which often have very different characteristics than the currently established ones.

Clinical Best Practices for Radiation Safety During Lutetium-177 Therapy.

IMPORTANCE: 177 Lu therapy as part of theranostic treatment for cancer is expanding but it can be a challenge for sites with limited radiation protection staff to implement the radiation safety program required for therapeutic nuclear medicine. OBJECTIVE: To increase the adoption of 177 Lu therapy, especially in smaller centers and clinics, by providing a collection of radiation safety best practices and operational experience. To provide a resource for radiation safety officers supporting the implementation of a 177 Lu therapy program. METHODS: A panel of 11 radiation safety professionals representing sites across Canada and the United States with experience delivering 177 Lu therapy was assembled and discussed their responses to a list of questions focused on the following radiation safety topics: facility layout and design; radiation safety program; and drug management and patient care. RESULTS: A comprehensive set of best practice guidelines for clinical radiation safety during 177 Lu therapy has been developed based on the collective operational experience of a group of radiation safety professionals. Significant findings included that 177 Lu therapy is often safely administered in unshielded rooms, that staff radiation exposure associated with 177 Lu therapy is minimal relative to other nuclear medicine programs, and that some relatively simple preparation in advance including papering of common surfaces and planning for incontinence can effectively control contamination during therapy. CONCLUSION: The guidance contained in this paper will assist radiation safety professionals in the implementation of safe, effective 177 Lu therapy programs, even at smaller sites with limited to no experience in therapeutic nuclear medicine.

[Pain reduction by radiosynoviorthesis in rheumatism-induced synovitis of the elbow : Results of a retrospective multicenter data analysis]. / Schmerzreduktion durch Radiosynoviorthese bei rheumatisch bedingter Synovialitis des Ellenbogens : Ergebnisse einer retrospektiven, multizentrischen Datenanalyse.

BACKGROUND: Radiosynoviorthesis (RSO) is a nuclear medical local treatment modality for inflammatory joint diseases. It is indicated in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in joints with persistent synovitis despite adequate pharmacotherapy. Arthritis of the elbow joint occurs in up to 2/3 of patients with RA. Intra-articular radiotherapy using the beta emitter [186Re] rhenium sulfide leads to sclerosis of the inflamed synovial membrane with subsequent pain alleviation. The clinical efficacy in cubital arthritis, however, has so far only been described in small monocentric studies. OBJECTIVE: The degree of pain alleviation by RSO was analyzed in patients with rheumatoid cubital arthritis, treated in several nuclear medical practices specialized in RSO. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The subjective pain intensity before and after RSO was documented in a total of 107 patients with rheumatic cubital arthritis using a 10-step numeric rating scale (NRS). A difference of ≥ -2 is rated as a significant improvement. Follow-up examinations were done after a mean interval of 14 months after RSO (at least 3 months, maximum 50 months). RESULTS: The mean NRS value was 7.3 ± 2.1 before RSO and 2.8 ± 2.2 after RSO. A significant pain alleviation was seen in 78.5% of all patients treated. The subgroup analysis also showed a significant improvement in the pain symptoms in all groups depending on the time interval between the RSO and the control examination. A significant pain progression was not observed. The degree of pain relief was independent of the time of follow-up. CONCLUSION: Using RSO for local treatment of rheumatoid cubital arthritis leads to a significant and long-lasting pain relief in more than ¾ of the treated patients.

Phase 1 Study of No-Carrier Added 177Lu-DOTATATE (SNU-KB-01) in Patients with Somatostatin Receptor-Positive Neuroendocrine Tumors: The First Clinical Trial of Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy in Korea.

PURPOSE: To provide a wider choice of treatment opportunities for patients with neuroendocrine tumor (NET) in Korea, we have conducted a phase 1, open-label, single-arm, dose-escalation study of SNU-KB-01, a no-carrier added (NCA) 177Lu-labeled DOTATATE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven patients with inoperable, progressive, metastatic, or locally advanced, somatostatin receptor-positive NET with Ki67 index ≤ 20% were enrolled according to the rolling six design. The study consisted of two cohorts to receive 4 cycles of SNU-KB-01 every 8 weeks for the first dose of 5.55 GBq (n=3) and 7.40 GBq (n=4). We assessed the incidence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and adverse event, absorbed dose of kidneys and bone marrow, and objective tumor response. RESULTS: Seven patients completed 4 cycles (21.3-30.1 GBq total dose) of SNU-KB-01. The mean absorbed doses to kidneys and bone marrow were 0.500 mGy/MBq and 0.053 mGy/MBq, respectively, and the total body effective dose was 0.115 mSv/MBq. No DLT was observed and the maximum tolerated dose was 7.40 GBq/cycle. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred in one patient, but no other grade 3 or 4 major hematologic or renal toxicity was observed. The best objective response to SNU-KB-01 was partial response. Overall response rate was 42.9% and disease control rate was 85.7%. CONCLUSION: Treatment with 4 cycles of SNU-KB-01 was well tolerated and resulted in control of disease in most of the patients. Our results indicate SNU-KB-01, an NCA 177Lu-labeled DOTATATE, as a potentially safe and efficacious treatment option for NET patients in Korea.

Dietary exposure of radionuclides and heavy metals in adult residents in a high background natural radiation area using duplicate diet method.

Intake of radionuclides and heavy metals through food consumption is one of the important pathways for long-term health considerations. In this paper, the dietary exposure to radionuclides (210Pb, 210Po, 226Ra, 228Ra, 40K, 137Cs and 129I) and heavy metals (As, Hg, Pb, Cd and U) of adult residents in the high background natural radiation area (HBNRA) in Yangjiang, China, was comprehensively assessed using duplicate diet method. The estimated effective dose received by the inhabitants in HBNRA from ingestion of radionuclides was 0.33 mSv/y, and the associated lifetime cancer risk was 1.1 × 10-3. Both the dose and cancer risk to humans were at the acceptable range, and showed no difference between the HBNRA and the control area. With respect to heavy metals, the estimated daily intake of heavy metals (DIM) values for As, Hg, Pb, Cd and U in HBNRA were 0.47, 0.03, 15.0, 0.26 and 0.04 µg/kg bw/d, respectively, and the corresponding target hazard quotient (THQ) were 1.58, 0.09, 3.7, 2.56, 0.18. The DIM and THQ of Cd and U in HBNRA were similar to the control area, but the DIM and THQ of Pb were much higher than the corresponding values of 0.39 and 0.03 in the control area. The hazard index (HI) value of heavy metals in HBNRA was almost twice that of the control area. This suggests that the inhabitants in the HBNRA may have a health risk associated with the heavy metals.

New Drug for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Pluvicto (lutetium Lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan) has been approved for the treatment of adult patients with prostate-specific membrane antigen-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who have received androgen receptor pathway inhibition and taxane-based chemotherapy.

Lutetium-177 DOTATATE: A Practical Review.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a heterogeneous group of tumors that originate in endocrine tissues throughout the body. Though most are indolent, clinical outcomes vary greatly based on histologic differentiation and grade. Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy has emerged as a promising treatment for patients with locally advanced and/or metastatic disease refractory to standard of care treatment. The phase III NETTER-1 trial found that [177Lu] Lu-DOTA-[Tyr3]-octreotate improved disease-free survival versus octreotide alone for somatostatin receptor-positive gastroenteropancreatic NETs and had a favorable toxicity profile, leading to Food and Drug Administration approval. [177Lu] Lu-DOTA-[Tyr3]-octreotate is an important new treatment that expands the role of radiation in the treatment of NETs. Several important trials are ongoing to better elucidate the role of this treatment.

Predictors and Real-World Use of Prostate-Specific Radioligand Therapy: PSMA and Beyond.

PSMA is a transmembrane protein that is markedly overexpressed in prostate cancer, making it an excellent target for imaging and treating patients with prostate cancer. Several small molecule inhibitors and antibodies of PSMA have been radiolabeled for use as therapeutic agents and are currently under clinical investigation. PSMA-based radionuclide therapy is a promising therapeutic option for men with metastatic prostate cancer. The phase II TheraP study demonstrated superior efficacy, lower side effects, and improved patient-reported outcomes compared with cabazitaxel. The phase III VISION study demonstrated that radionuclide therapy with ß-emitter 177Lu-PSMA-617 can prolong survival and improve quality of life when offered in addition to standard-of-care therapy in men with PSMA-positive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer whose disease had progressed with conventional treatments. Nevertheless, up to 30% of patients have inherent resistance to PSMA-based radionuclide therapy, and acquired resistance is inevitable. Hence, strategies to increase the efficacy of PSMA-based radionuclide therapy have been under clinical investigation. These include better patient selection; increased radiation damage delivery via dosimetry-based administered dose or use of α-emitters instead of ß-emitters; or using combinatorial approaches to overcome radioresistance mechanisms (innate or acquired), such as with novel hormonal agents, PARP inhibitors, or immunotherapy.

Evaluation of Liver and Renal Toxicity in Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy for Somatostatin Receptor Expressing Tumors: A 2-Year Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) with radiolabeled somatostatin receptor (SSR) analogs is now an established systemic treatment for neuroendocrine tumors (NET). However, more short- and long-term data about renal and hepatotoxicity is needed. Here we present our experience in this clinical scenario. METHODS: Eighty-six patients with progressive SSR-expressing malignancies underwent PRRT with Lu-177 Dotatate and were followed up for up to 2 years. Laboratory tests were done 1 week before each cycle and every 2 months at follow-up. Hepatic and renal toxicity was determined based on NCI CTCAE V5.0. RESULTS: 55/86 (64%) patients completed all 4 cycles of PRRT; 18/86 (20.9%) are currently being treated; 13/86 (15.1%) had to discontinue PRRT: 4/13 (31%) due to hematologic toxicity, 9/13 (69%) due to non-PRRT-related comorbidities. Out of the patients who finished treatment, only transient grade 2 toxicities were observed during PRRT: hypoalbuminemia in 5.5% (3/55), and renal toxicity (serum creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate) in 1.8% (1/55). No grade 3 or 4 liver and renal toxicity occurred. Patients presenting with impaired liver or renal function prior to PRRT, either improved or had stable findings. No deterioration was observed. CONCLUSION: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy does not have a negative impact on liver and renal function, even in patients with pre-existing impaired parameters. No grade 3 or 4 hepatic or renal toxicity was identified. Only transient grade 2 hypoalbuminemia in 5.5% and nephrotoxicity in 1.8% of patients were seen during PRRT.

Long-term survival and toxicity in patients with neuroendocrine tumors treated with 177 Lu-octreotate peptide radionuclide therapy.

BACKGROUND: Peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) has shown favorable results in neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Long-term safety and efficacy data for 177 Lu-octreotate PRRT, particularly in combination with chemotherapy, is lacking. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective review of the long-term toxicity and survival outcomes of 104 patients with advanced NETs treated on 4 phase 2 clinical trials with Lutetium-177-octreotate (177 Lu-octreotate) PRRT, mostly in combination with chemotherapy. Median follow-up was 68 months, which represents the longest follow-up study of 177 Lu-octreotate PRRT for NETs to date. RESULTS: Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 37 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 71 months. Five- and 10-year OS were 62% and 29%, and 5- and 10-year PFS were 36% and 21%, respectively, demonstrating 177 Lu-octreotate can provide durable responses. PRRT was well tolerated with 1.9% of patients developing chronic renal impairment and 1% of patients developing long-term thrombocytopenia. Interestingly, there was a relatively high rate of myelodysplasia (MDS)/leukemia (6.7%), possibly attributable to the longer follow-up (with all except 1 case occurring more than 4 years after PRRT treatment) or to the addition of concurrent chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Lutetium-177-Octreotate PRRT remains an efficacious and well tolerated treatment in long-term follow-up. For clinicians deciding on the timing of PRRT for individual patients, the 6.7% long-term risk of MDS/leukemia needs to be balanced against the 21% PFS at 10 years.

Mutant PPM1D- and TP53-Driven Hematopoiesis Populates the Hematopoietic Compartment in Response to Peptide Receptor Radionuclide Therapy.

PURPOSE: Hematologic toxic effects of peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) can be permanent. Patients with underlying clonal hematopoiesis (CH) may be more inclined to develop hematologic toxicity after PRRT. However, this association remains understudied. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We evaluated pre- and post-PRRT blood samples of patients with neuroendocrine tumors. After initial screening, 13 cases of interest were selected. Serial blood samples were obtained on 4 of 13 patients. Genomic DNA was analyzed using a 100-gene panel. A variant allele frequency cutoff of 1% was used to call CH. RESULT: Sixty-two percent of patients had CH at baseline. Persistent cytopenias were noted in 64% (7 of 11) of the patients. Serial sample analysis demonstrated that PRRT exposure resulted in clonal expansion of mutant DNA damage response genes (TP53, CHEK2, and PPM1D) and accompanying cytopenias in 75% (3 of 4) of the patients. One patient who had a normal baseline hemogram and developed persistent cytopenias after PRRT exposure showed expansion of mutant PPM1D (variant allele frequency increased to 20% after exposure from < 1% at baseline). In the other two patients, expansion of mutant TP53, CHEK2, and PPM1D clones was also noted along with cytopenia development. CONCLUSION: The shifts in hematopoietic clonal dynamics in our study were accompanied by emergence and persistence of cytopenias. These cytopenias likely represent premalignant state, as PPM1D-, CHEK2-, and TP53-mutant clones by themselves carry a high risk for transformation to therapy-related myeloid neoplasms. Future studies should consider CH screening and longitudinal monitoring as a key risk mitigation strategy for patients with neuroendocrine tumors receiving PRRT.

Potential improvements in brain dose estimates for internal emitters.

BACKGROUND: Element-specific biokinetic models are used to reconstruct doses to systemic tissues from internal emitters. Typically, a systemic model for a radionuclide explicitly depicts only its dominant repositories. Remaining tissues and fluids are aggregated into a pool called Other tissue in which the radionuclide is assumed to be uniformly distributed. In the systemic biokinetic models used in radiation protection, the brain usually is addressed as an implicit mass fraction of Other tissue rather than an explicitly depicted repository. Due to increasing interest in radiation effects on the brain, efforts are underway to improve brain dosimetry for internal radiation sources. METHODS: We assessed potential improvements in brain dosimetry for internal emitters by explicitly modeling brain kinetics rather than treating the brain as a mass fraction of Other tissue. We selected 10 elements for which brain kinetics can be modeled using published biokinetic data. Injection dose coefficients were calculated for a relatively long-lived radioisotope of each element using each of two versions of the ICRP's latest systemic biokinetic model for the element, the original version and a modified version differing only in the treatment of brain. If the ICRP model contained an explicit brain pool, the modified version depicted brain instead as a mass fraction of Other tissue. If the ICRP model included brain in Other tissue, the modified version included an explicit brain pool with kinetics based on best available brain-specific data. RESULTS: The result for a given radionuclide is expressed as a ratio A:B, where A and B are the dose coefficients based on the versions of the model with and without an explicit brain pool, respectively. The following ratios A:B were obtained for the 10 radionuclides addressed here: 241Am, 0.13; 207Bi, 0.57; 234U, 0.81; 239Pu, 0.96; 203Hg (vapor), 1.4; 134Cs, 1.5; 54Mn, 1.7; 210Po, 1.7; 226Ra, 1.9; 210Pb, 3.3. These ratios indicate that a dose estimate for brain based on a biokinetic model with brain implicitly contained in Other tissue may substantially underestimate or substantially overestimate a dose estimate that reflects best available brain-specific biokinetic data. Of course, the reliability of the latter estimate depends on the quality of the underlying biokinetic data. CONCLUSIONS: Where feasible, the brain should be depicted explicitly in biokinetic models used in epidemiological studies addressing adverse effects of ionizing radiation.